Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine provides an estimation of the bone mineral content (BMC) corrected by the projected area of the spine and expressed in g/cm². This two-dimensional estimate of the bone mineral density (BMD) is influenced by the skeletal size, assessed by the subject's height. In order to obtain an estimate of the volumetric BMD, we measured BMC with a new DXA device (Sophos L-XRA) equipped with 24 detectors and a rotating arm, thus allowing scanning of the lumbar spine in both an anteroposterior (AP) projection and a lateral (LAT) projection with the patient in a supine position. Comparison between the results obtained on the third (L3) and fourth (L4) lumbar vertebrae with automatic or manual analysis showed that the best precision was obtained with the lateral measurement of L3 alone with an automatic soft tissue baseline determination. Results were expressed in g/cm² and in g/cm³ (by dividing the g/cm² value by the width (AP area divided by the height of the vertebra) of L3), and were compared with those obtained by conventional AP scanning of L2–4 (g/cm²). The in vivo precision error evaluated by triplicate measurements on 10 controls was 17 mg/cm² (1.96%) and 5.2 mg/cm³ (2.31%) for LAT L3 as compared with 13 mg/cm² (1.15%) for AP L2–4. Volumetric BMD (g/cm³) measurement, assessed in vitro on a calibrated hydroxyapatite phantom, and the absolute values obtained in normal women were similar to those obtained by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). In 39 healthy adults (27±4 years) BMD expressed in g/cm² was correlated with height (r=0.36 for AP L2–4 andr=0.39 for LAT L3;p<0.05 for both) but not with LAT L3 BMD expressed in g/cm³ (r=0.02; NS). The age-related bone loss between 30 and 80 years of age, derived from the normal values for 101 healthy women (age range 19–73 years) was 36% for AP L2–4, 52% for LAT L3 (g/cm²) and 60% for LAT L3 (g/cm³). In a group of 22 women with untreated postmenopausal vertebral osteoporosis (one or more non-traumatic vertebral crush fractures) the mean decrease in BMD, expressed as a percentage of the age-adjusted normal value, was more pronounced (p<0.001) for LAT L3 BMD (–21% in g/cm²,Z-score –1.08; –22% in g/cm³,Z-score –0.94) than for AP L2–4 BMD (–9%,Z-score –0.66). We conclude that: 1) BMD measurement restricted to the vertebral body of L3 can be achieved with a low precision error with this new DXA device; 2) it allows an estimate of the volumetric density (g/cm³) which does not seem to be influenced by skeletal size; 3) lateral BMD appears to be more sensitive than conventional AP scanning for assessing age-related bone loss and should be useful in the investigation of trabecular osteoporosis.     

A Comparative Study of Computed Digital Absorptiometry and Conventional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Postmenopausal Women

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether computed digital absorptiometry (CDA) of the hand might be a useful screening technique for identifying patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and to compare the results of CDA with those of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. We studied 230 postmenopausal women (mean age 58.4 ± 7.9 years). For CDA, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with an AccuDEXA Schick densitometer in the third middle phalanx of the nondominant hand. For DXA, BMD of the lumbar spine and upper femur was assessed using a DXA Hologic QDR-1000 densitometer. We did a comparative analysis (ANOVA) and linear correlation tests. Sensitivity and specificity of CDA and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the diagnosis of osteoporosis were calculated. The mean BMD with CDA was 0.445 ± 0.084 (T-score: −1.27 ± 1.29). The mean BMD (g/cm²) with DXA at the lumbar spine was 0.877 ± 0.166 (T-score: −1.52 ± 1.59) and 0.708 ± 0.127 at the femoral neck (T-score: −1.12 ± 1.25). BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck correlated positively with CDA of the hand (r= 0.66 and r= 0.65 respectively, p<0.001). When using as cut-off a T-score of −2.5, according to WHO criteria, 76 women (33%) had osteoporosis of the lumbar spine and/or femoral neck with DXA and 42 (18%) with CDA (p<0.001). The kappa score for osteoporosis was 0.33 for CDA versus spinal DXA and 0.35 for CDA versus femoral DXA. With the cut-off level used, sensitivity and specificity of CDA in detecting osteoporosis at the lumbar spine were 0.39 and 0.90, respectively; sensitivity and specificity of CDA in identifying osteoporosis at the femoral neck were 0.58 and 0.87, respectively. The positive predictive value of CDA for osteoporosis was 69% and the negative predictive value was 75%. The area under the ROC curve for osteoporosis was 0.822 ± 0.028. We conclude that: (a) CDA assessment has a moderate correlation with BMD measured by DXA at the lumbar spine and femoral neck; (b) CDA has a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of osteoporosis compared with spinal and femoral DXA; and (c) predictive values for osteoporosis at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck are acceptable. Received: September 2000 / Accepted: January 2001     

Quantitative Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Spinal Osteoporosis Following Spinal Cord Injury

Disuse osteoporosis occurs in the lower extremities of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, spinal osteoporosis is not usually observed in these patients. We investigated lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in SCI patients using single energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Our study population consisted of 64 patients with long-standing SCI. Spine BMD (g/cm³) was assessed by QCT at four vertebrae ranging from T11 to L4 with single midvertebral CT slices 1 cm thick parallel to the vertebral end-plates. Confounding variables affecting normal trabecular bone pattern, such as compression fractures, surgical hardware or fat replacement, were excluded. For a subset of 29 patients, DXA values of the spine and femoral neck were also measured, and QCT and DXA Z-scores were compared On the average, the 64 SCI patients had Z-scores 2.0 ± 1.2 below those of age-matched controls. In the subset of 29 patients with both QCT and DXA measurements, the QCT and DXA Z-scores were 2.4 ± 1.1 below and 1.3 ± 2.3 above the mean, respectively (p<0.0001). Our results indicate that QCT reveals osteoporosis of the spine after SCI, in contrast to DXA. We postulate that QCT is more valuable for evaluating spinal osteoporosis following SCI than DXA and thus recommend QCT for spinal BMD studies in SCI. Received: 20 December 1999 / Accepted: 17 April 2000     

A comparison of spinal quantitative computed tomography with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in European women with vertebral and nonvertebral fractures

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was compared to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured in the lumbar spine of 508 European women defined as normal without fracture (NoF), or osteoporotic (OP), with either vertebral fracture (VF), or peripheral fracture (PF). The correlations between QCT and DXA BMD measurements were significantly different in normal and in osteoporotic patients, indicating that the two exams do not measure the same bone aspects. According to ROC curves results, QCT Z-scores separate OP from NoF with better sensitivity than all other measurements. A threshold to differentiate OP from NoF was chosen at Z-score=−1 for DXA-BMD and −1.5 for QCT-BMD. VF patients showed a highly significant decrease in BMD by DXA or QCT. PF patients revealed measurements lower than those of normal subjects but greater than those of VF, calling into question the idea of a diffuse osteoporosis causing nonvertebral fractures that is measurable by spinal DXA or QCT. DXA is weakly dependent upon age, and T-score or Z-score are equivalent for evaluating osteoporosis. QCT depends greatly upon age, and Z-score appears to be more efficient.     

Early postmenopausal diminution of forearm and spinal bone mineral density: A cross-sectional study

Diminution of bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine and forearm was studied cross-sectionally in 363 women who were 6 months to 10 years postmenopausal. BMD was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic QDR-2000) in the lumbar spine, in both the supine lateral (LAT) and anteroposterior (AP) projections, and in the distal third of the forearm. The postmenopausal diminution of BMD was best described by an exponential fit. The initial rate of postmenopausal diminution of BMD was highest in the most trabecular sites (LAT>AP> forearm), but 10-year diminution was similar at all sites (12%–13%, corresponding to about 1.0–1.5 SD), and extrapolation suggested reverse order of the rates of diminution thereafter (forearm>AP>LAT). When bone mineral content of the entire L3 vertebra (tBMC) was measured in vivo, AP tBMC could account for only 67% of the variation in LAT tBMC, compared withr ²=0.997 in vitro. This observation suggests an accuracy problem in vivo in one of the spine measurement methods. We conclude that the initial rate of BMD diminution after the menopause seems to be highest in the spine, especially when measured laterally, but that this rate levels off within the first decade. The lower precision error of a forearm measurement (0.8% v 1.6 for AP and 3.1 for LAT) therefore implies that this method may require a shorter observation period than spine measurements for the detection of bone loss 5–10 years after menopause. Long-term longitudinal spine and forearm measurements are, however, needed to confirm these conclusions.     

A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: A comparison with posteroanterior spine,hip and total-body DXA

We report a study to assess whether supine lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the lumbar spine provide better data for monitoring response to treatment than alternative measurement sites such as the posteroanterior (PA) spine, hip and total body. The study population was 152 women enrolled in a placebo-controlled clinical trial of cyclical etidronate therapy. All subjects were 1–10 years after the menopause with bone mineral density (BMD) between 0 and –2 SD of age-matched normal women. Paired PA and lateral spine, left hip and total-body DXA scans were performed at baseline, 1 year and 2 years on a Hologic QDR-2000. One hundred and thirty-one subjects completed the study. Mean percentage change from baseline at 2 years in the treated (n=61) and control (n=70) groups was calculated for vertebral body, width-adjusted (WA) vertebral body, mid-vertebral body and WA mid-vertebral body BMD measurements on the lateral scans and compared with the percentage changes in PA spine, femoral neck, trochanter, Ward's triangle and total-body BMD. The long-term precision for each BMD measurement site was obtained by linear regression analysis in subjects taking placebo. Overall treatment effect, defined as the difference in the percentage change in BMD in the two treatment groups at 2 years, was divided by long-term precision to give an index of the ability of each site to monitor response to treatment. Results (and standard errors) normalized to the ratio of treatment effect/precision for PA spine BMD were as follows: PA spine, 1.00; vertebral body, 0.89 (0.14); WA vertebral body, 0.78 (0.14); mid-vertebral body, 0.65 (0.14); WA mid-vertebral body, 0.60 (0.13); femoral neck, 0.35 (0.15); trochanter, 0.45 (0.15); Ward's triangle, 0.59 (0.22); total body, 0.52 (0.19). Although treatment effect was larger for lateral than for PA spine BMD, this advantage was offset by the greater precision errors. PA spine BMD remains the optimum measurement for longitudinal studies in recently postmenopausal women.     

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: A cross-sectional study of 717 finnish volunteers

The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 717 healthy women aged 20–70 years. The maximal mean BMD was found at the age of 35–39 years in the spine and at the age of 20–24 in the femoral neck and Ward's triangle. No significant change in lumbar BMD was found from the age of 20 to 39 years. The spinal BMD values were relatively stable from age 20 to 39 years, whereas a linear decrease in BMD in the femoral neck and Ward's triangle was already apparent in the youngest age group (20–24 years). The major fall in BMD in all sites was related to the menopause. The overall decreases in BMD from the peak values to those at age 65–70 years were 20.4%, 19.0% and 32.6% in the lumbar spine, femoral neck and Ward's triangle, respectively. The correlation of trochanteric BMD with age was poor. BMD was positively correlated with weight in all measurement sites. Nulliparity was found to be a risk factor for osteoporosis. The present study confirmed that the menopause has a significant effect not only on spinal BMD but also on femoral BMD. Lumbar BMD was lower and BMDs in the proximal femur were higher in Finnish women than in white American women. This emphasizes the importance of national reference values for BMD measurements.     

Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT

Major alterations in body composition, such as with obesity and weight loss, have complex effects on the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). The effects of altered body fat on quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements are unknown. We scanned a spine phantom by DXA and QCT before and after surrounding with sequential fat layers (up to 12 kg). In addition, we measured lumbar spine and proximal femur BMD by DXA and trabecular spine BMD by QCT in 13 adult volunteers before and after a simulated 7.5 kg increase in body fat. With the spine phantom, DXA BMD increased linearly with sequential fat layering at the normal (p < 0.01) and osteopenic (p < 0.01) levels, but QCT BMD did not change significantly. In humans, fat layering significantly reduced DXA spine BMD values (mean ± SD: ?2.2 ± 3.7%, p = 0.05) and increased the variability of measurements. In contrast, fat layering increased QCT spine BMD in humans (mean ± SD: 1.5 ± 2.5%, p = 0.05). Fat layering did not change mean DXA BMD of the femoral neck or total hip in humans significantly, but measurements became less precise. Associations between baseline and fat‐simulation scans were stronger for QCT of the spine (r² = 0.97) than for DXA of the spine (r² = 0.87), total hip (r² = 0.80), or femoral neck (r² = 0.75). Bland‐Altman plots revealed that fat‐associated errors were greater for DXA spine and hip BMD than for QCT trabecular spine BMD. Fat layering introduces error and decreases the reproducibility of DXA spine and hip BMD measurements in human volunteers. Although overlying fat also affects QCT BMD measurements, the error is smaller and more uniform than with DXA BMD. Caution must be used when interpreting BMD changes in humans whose body composition is changing. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of the Phalanges, Lumbar Spine, Hip, and Forearm for Assessment of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women

The objective of this study was to compare peripheral bone mineral density (BMD) of the phalanges with BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and forearm and to determine the clinical value of measuring a single peripheral site (phalanges) in identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry using the accuDEXA((R)) (ADXA-finger) (Schick, New York, NY) and the QDR-4500 (DXA-lumbar spine, hip, forearm) (Hologic, Waltham, MA). Correlation coefficients between ADXA and DXA of the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck and one third radial site ranged from 0.53 to 0.73. The sensitivity of an ADXA T-score of -2.5 in identifying patients with a DXA T-score of < or = -2.5 at the femoral neck was 35%. An ADXA T-score cut point of -1.0 improved the sensitivity of ADXA in identifying patients with a femoral neck T-score of < or = -2.5 (85%), but the specificity declined from 88 to 49%. There was substantial discordance in the diagnosis of osteoporosis when a single site was measured, regardless of technique. Within the limitations of single-site measurements, BMD measured by ADXA has adequate sensitivity to identify women with low BMD at the femoral neck, if an appropriate T-score criterion is used.     

An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry

Dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) is a well-established procedure for measuring bone mineral density (BMD). Recently, dual-energy X-ray absorptiomery (DXA) has become available, which has the ability to measure BMD both regionally and in the total body (TB). We have evaluated the in vivo and in vitro precision of a DXA instrument and compared it with a DPA instrument with similar software characteristics.The short-term precision of BMD measurements using DXA was assessed in 65 postmenopausal women who had duplicate scans performed, with repositioning between scans. Precision was 0.9% in the lumbar spine and 1.4% in the femoral neck.The midterm precision of DXA was compared with DPA by scanning 10 volunteers a mean of four times over 24 weeks, on both instruments. The precision of the bone mineral content (BMC) and area measurements was significantly better (P<0.05) with DXA than with DPA. Long-term in vitro precision was assessed by scanning an aluminium spine phantom over 42 weeks, and a cadaveric sample over 52 weeks, on both instruments. Precision was similar using the aluminium phantom, but was significantly improved (P<0.001) when using DXA for scanning the cadaveric sample.Highly significant correlations (allP<0.001) of BMD, BMC and area measurements were observed when 70 volunteers were scanned on both instruments. However, there was a systematic difference in BMD values between the instruments. The precision of TB composition measurements assessed in 16 volunteers, over a 16-week period, were TB BMD 0.65%, TB lean tissue 1.47%, and TB fat tissue 2.73%. The correlation between weight measured by electronic scales and TB mass as measured by DXA, which was assessed in 70 volunteers, was excellent (r=0.99,p<0.001).We conclude that DXA offers improvements in measuring BMD over DPA in terms of faster scanning times and improved resolution, resulting in better precision, with the additional advantage of the ability to measure TB composition with high precision.     

Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: A comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography

We compared quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with respect to their ability to discriminate subjects with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. In 240 post-menopausal women (mean age 63.7±6.9 years) lateral spine radiographs (T4-L4) were reviewed for the presence of vertebral fracture. Using a semiquantitative technique to grade the severity of vertebral deformities, we classified fractures as mild, moderate or severe (grade 1 to 3, respectively). Postero-anterior DXA (PA-DXA) and lateral DXA (L-DXA) measurements (L2–4) as well as QCT measurements of the lumbar spine (T12-L3 or L1–14) were obtained in all women. Seventy-two women were diagnosed with at least one fracture, and of these 40 were graded as mild. Comparing normal women with fractured women, we found the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves to be greatest for QCT (0.81), followed by L-DXA (0.72) and PA-DXA (0.65). The differences among all three techniques were significant. Comparing the normal women with women having only mild fractures, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.79, 0.73 and 0.63 for QCT, L-DXA and PA-DXA, respectively. Significant differences existed between QCT and PA-DXA as well as between L-DXA and PA-DXA. Logistic regression analysis also revealed the highest age-adjusted odds ratios for QCT (3.67; 2.25–5.97) while L-DXA and PA-DXA showed substantially lower odds ratios (2.00; 1.39–2.87, and 1.54; 1.11–2.15, respectively). We conclude that low bone density as measured by QCT, PA-DXA or L-DXA is significantly associated with the prevalence of vertebral fractures. Of the methods studied, QCT of trabecular bone offered the best discriminatory capability. L-DXA proved to be superior to PA-DXA in its diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in women with mild fracture. Mild vertebral fractures are associated with decreased spinal bone density and may be regarded as osteoporotic deformities.     

Determination of age-specific bone mineral density and comparison of diagnosis and prevalence of primary osteoporosis in Chinese women based on both Chinese and World Health Organization criteria

The aim of this study was to determine age-specific bone mineral density (BMD) at various skeletal regions in a native Chinese reference population, and to explore the differences in the diagnosis of primary osteoporosis and estimated prevalence of osteoporosis based on both Chinese criteria (BMD of subjects, 25% lower than the peak BMD) and WHO criteria (BMD of subjects, 2.5 SD [T-score –2.5] lower than the young adult mean [YAM]). There were 3406 subjects in our female reference population, ranging in age from 10 to 90 years. A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) fan-beam bone densitometer (Hologic QDR 4500A) was used to measure the BMD in subjects at the posteroanterior (PA) spine (L1–L4), supine lateral spine (L2–L4 including areal BMD [aBMD] and volumetric BMD [vBMD]), hip (including femoral neck and total hip), and radius + ulna ultradistal (R + UUD) of the forearm. Cross-sectional data analysis in stratified 5-year age intervals revealed that the peak BMD (PBMD) at various skeletal regions occurred within the age range of 30–44 years, with PBMD at the lateral spine and femoral neck occurring at 30–34 years, posteroanterior spine and total hip at 35–39 years, and ultradistal forearm at 35–44 years. The reference values of BMD (PBMD) calculated using Chinese criteria for the diagnosis of primary osteoporosis were significantly higher than the young adult mean (YAM) using WHO criteria for all skeletal regions except for the total hip, at a range of 0.9%–3.8% higher. The BMD cutoff values using Chinese criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 3.7%–10.9% higher than those using WHO criteria for various skeletal regions. The prevalence rate of primary osteoporosis according to Chinese criteria in subjects ranging from 50 to 90 years was 41.5% at the PA spine, 53.9% at the lateral spine, 34.2% at the femoral neck, 30.7% for total hip, and 51.4% at R + UUD; while according to WHO criteria, this rate was 32.1% at the PA spine, 34.9% at the lateral spine, 16.3% at the femoral neck, 18.9% for total hip, and 45.2% at R + UUD. The prevalence of primary osteoporosis according to both criteria varied with the age and skeletal region of the subjects. The prevalence of primary osteoporosis using Chinese criteria, compared with WHO criteria was 31% higher at the lumbar spine, 109% higher at the femoral neck, and 14% higher at the ultradistal forearm. In conclusion, PBMD occurs in the age range of 30–44 years in native Chinese females. The BMD reference values, BMD cutoff values, and prevalence of primary osteoporosis determined by Chinese criteria are all higher than those determined by the WHO criteria; thus, the application of Chinese criteria may overestimate the number of patients with primary osteoporosis.     

Osteoporosis assessment by whole body region vs. site-specific DXA

The ability of regional data from whole body scans to provide an accurate assessment of site-specific BMD, osteoporosis prevalence and fracture risk has not been fully explored. To address these issues, we measured total body (TBBD) and site-specific BMD in an age-stratified population sample of 351 women (21–93 years) and 348 men (22–90 years). We found an excellent correlation between AP lumbar spine and total body lumbar spine subregion BMD (r ²=0.92), but weaker ones for total hip compared to pelvis region (r ²=0.72) or between total wrist and left arm subregion from the whole body scan (r ²=0.83). The error in estimating site-specific BMD from total body regions ranged from 4.3% (lumbar spine) to 11.2% (femoral neck) in women and from 4.9 to 11.1%, respectively, in men. Site-specific versus regional measurements at the lumbar spine and total hip/pelvis provided comparable overall estimates of osteoporosis prevalence, but disagreed on the status of individuals; measurements at whole body regions underestimated osteoporosis as assessed at the femoral neck or total wrist. All measurements were associated with a history of various fractures [age adjusted odds ratios (OR), 1.3 to 2.1 in women and 1.2 to 1.5 in men] and were generally interchangeable, but femoral neck BMD provided the best estimate of osteoporotic fracture risk in women (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7–5.0). Although there are strong correlations between BMD from dedicated scans of the hip, spine and distal forearm and corresponding regions on the whole body scan, the measurements provide somewhat different estimates of osteoporosis prevalence and fracture risk.     

The effects of standardization and reference values on patient classification for spine and femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

The effect of two methods for standardizing dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements on patient classification by theT-score has been determined for a group of over 2000 patients. The methods proposed by the International DXA Standardization Committee and the European Community's COMAC-BME group were used in conjunction with young reference data from the major DXA manufacturers, the COMAC-BME group and the third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). The two standardization techniques produced dissimilar classifications as measured by the kappa statistic (=0.34–0.90), especially for the femoral neck, with up to 24.3% of patients reclassified from osteopenic to normal and 18.6% reclassified from osteoporotic to osteopenic when the standardization method was changed. Considering the effects of both reference data and standardization techniques together, there was a wide variation of patient classification, with the number of patients classified as osteoporotic varying from 9.6% to 21.1% for the postero-anterior spine L2–4 region and from 2.3% to 27.6% for the femoral neck. The agreement between different classifications ranged widely, from very poor to excellent (=0.02–0.98). The creation of standardized reference data must be an important priority in order to harmonize patient management using standardized BMD measurements. The choice of standardization technique, however, must be addressed in light of the results presented here.     

Spinal and Femoral DXA for the Assessment of Spinal Osteoporosis

The objective was to determine the diagnostic sensitivity of spinal and femoral dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to study whether a combination of both sites may enhance discriminatory capability in regard to the presence of vertebral fractures. Spinal and femoral DXA were obtained in 324 postmenopausal women, of whom 90 had at least one vertebral fracture. Age-adjusted logistic regression analyses, ROC analyses, and sensitivity-specificity statistics were used to assess the discriminatory ability of spinal and femoral bone density (BMD) alone and in combination. The age-adjusted odds ratios per standard deviation decrease in BMD (OR) for spinal and femoral measurements were comparable (Ward's triangle: OR = 1.62; femoral neck: OR = 1.51; total hip: OR = 1.47; spine: OR = 1.34). Combining spinal and femoral bone density measurements did not improve diagnostic sensitivity of DXA considerably as compared to using BMD of a single site and adjusting the ``fracture threshold.' The conclusion drawn is that spinal and femoral BMD measurements using DXA have a comparable diagnostic sensitivity for vertebral fracture discrimination. Different individuals at risk for osteoporosis may be identified using both methods. The clinical usefulness of a combination of two bone density measurements needs further study in a prospective setting. Received: 7 January 1997 / Accepted: 5 June 1997     

Which vertebrae should be assessed using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine

The purpose of this study was to determine precision and diagnostic capability of bone mineral density measurements using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine in supine position. Duplicate postero-anterior (PA) and lateral DXA measurements were performed in 60 women. Precision errors of the single vertebral levels using lateral DXA ranged from 3.3% to 4.9%. The combination of all levels improved the precision errors to 2.0%. Paired PA and lateral DXA measurements (Hologic QDR 2000) including the vertebral levels L2 to L4 were performed in 331 postmenopausal women. In 42 women an overlap of L4 by the pelvis was suspected on the lateral DXA images. Vertebral fractures were assessed as a fracture/non-fracture dichotomy. L4 and combinations of vertebrae including L4 showed the best discriminatory capabilities with respect to vertebral fractures in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses,t-tests andZ-scores, with smaller variability of the results when multiple vertebral levels were used. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.662 and 0.639 for lateral and PA measurements of L2 to L4, respectively when all women were included. Excluding the women with pelvic overlap on lateral DXA scans improved the ROC area for lateral scans to 0.686 while that for PA scans remained almost constant (0.641). The differences between PA and lateral measurements were not statistically significant. In 162 women of our study cohort an additional quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurement of the vertebral levels L2 to L4 was performed and overlapping bony structures at the three levels were studied. Overlapping bony structures were found on QCT slices in 96.9% at the L2 level and in 31.5% at the L3 level. At the L4 level an overlap was found in 5.6% of the women in addition to 31 women in whom L4 overlap had been suspected on DXA images. In total, the level L4 was overlapped in 24.7% of the women. Lateral DXA measurements of the lumbar spine with the patient in supine position are meaningful for diagnosis and follow-up of osteopenia. The inclusion of a maximum number of vertebrae, i.e. L2 to L4 (if L4 is not overlapped by pelvic bone), improves precision and diagnostic capability of the method.     

Prevalence of osteoporosis using bone mineral measurements at the calcaneus by dual X-ray and laser (DXL)

Using manufacturers reference data the prevalence of osteoporosis using a T-score threshold of –2.5 for heel measurements by DXL technology was compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements at the femoral neck, spine and forearm. The prevalence of osteoporosis for women aged 50 years or older was 28% for DXL measurements of the heel bone and 30, 22 and 32% for DXA measurements of the lumbar spine, femoral neck and forearm respectively. Bone mineral density (BMD) was also measured by DXL in the heel bone and by DXA in spine and femoral neck in 251 women (mean age 62±14.5 years) when attending an osteoporosis clinic. The sensitivity and specificity for osteoporosis and osteopenia for the DXL measurements were calculated assuming a low T-score at the spine or femoral neck as the criterion for a correct diagnosis. The sensitivity was found to be 80% for osteoporosis and 82% for osteopenia and the specificity was 82% for osteoporosis and 89% for osteopenia. We conclude that DXL measurement at the heel bone, using a T-score threshold of –2.5 for classification of osteoporosis, is in concordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of osteoporosis.     

A Comparison Study of the Reference Curves of Bone Mineral Density at Different Skeletal Sites in Native Chinese,Japanese, and American Caucasian Women

To understand the differences among reference curves for bone mineral density (BMD) for Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women, we measured the BMD at the anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spine (L1–L4), lateral lumbar spine (L2–L4), hip (including the femoral neck, trochanter, intertrochanter, Wards triangle, and total hip), and ultradistal forearm by the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a total of 2728 healthy Chinese women, aged 5–96 years. Documented BMD data for Japanese women and device manufacturers BMD new reference databases (including the NHANES III dataset) for American Caucasian women were also used in this study. The cubic regression model was found to fit best in analyzing the age-associated variations of BMD at various sites in Chinese women, i.e., the equations had the largest coefficient of determination (R ²). At the AP/Lat spine, trochanter, intertrochanter, and Wards triangle, BMD reference curves for Chinese women were lower than those for Japanese or Caucasian women, while at the femoral neck, total hip, and ultradistal forearm, the reference curves for Chinese women were higher than those for Japanese women, with overlaps and crossing of the curves for some age spans in comparing the Chinese and Caucasian women. There were significant differences in the peak BMD (PBMD) at various sites among the Chinese, Japanese, and Caucasian women (P = 0.000). The PBMDs for Chinese women at the lumbar spine and various sites of the hip were 5.7% ± 2.1% (mean ± SD, range, 2.7–7.9%) lower than those for Japanese women and 5.1% ± 2.7% (range, 0.5–7.2%) lower than those for Caucasian women; however, the PBMDs for Chinese women were 26.2% higher than those for Japanese women and 10% higher than those for Caucasian women at the ultradistal forearm. After the PBMD, average T-scores of Chinese women for losses at the AP lumbar spine with increasing age were nearly identical to those for Japanese women, but both were greater than those for Caucasian women. The average T-scores for BMD loss at various sites in Chinese women were higher than those for both Japanese and Caucasian women except at the femoral neck, where the T-scores of Chinese women were exceeded by those of both Japanese and Caucasian women. Estimated from the T-score curve of BMD loss, the age of osteoporosis occurrence at the femoral neck in Chinese women was about 10 years later than that in Japanese or Caucasian women; at the AP spine, Chinese women were similar to Japanese women; at the other sites, the age for occurrence of osteoporosis in Chinese women was about 5–15 years earlier than that in either Japanese or Caucasian women. There are differences in prevalence or odds ratio (OR) of osteoporosis at the same skeletal region for Chinese, Japanese, and Caucasian women aged 50 years or at different skeletal regions in women of the same race. The prevalences of osteoporosis at various regions of the hip in Chinese women are 10.1–19.8% and ORs are 22.0–32.3, of which prevalence at the femoral neck is the lowest (10.1%); the prevalences of osteoporosis in Japanese women are 11.6–16.8% and ORs are 21.1–26.3, of which prevalence at the femoral neck is the lowest (11.6%); and the prevalences of osteoporosis in Caucasian women are 13.0–20.0% and ORs are 19.4–48.9, of which prevalence at the femoral neck is the highest (20%). In conclusion, racial differences in BMD reference curves, prevalences, and risks of osteoporosis at various skeletal sites exist among native Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women.     

Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

The DMS Lexxos is the first cone-beam dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) system capable of performing bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the spine and hip. By using a two-dimensional (2-D) detector array rather than the linear array used with conventional fan-beam DXA systems, image acquisition time on Lexxos is only 1.5 s. However, the need to correct for the large signal from scattered radiation reaching the detector is a potential source of error in cone-beam DXA. The aim of this clinical evaluation of the Lexxos bone densitometer was to investigate the relative accuracy of cone-beam BMD measurements compared with conventional DXA by performing an in vivo cross-calibration study with an established fan-beam system, the Hologic QDR-4500. Spine (L1–L4) and hip BMD measurements were performed in 135 patients (111 women, 24 men) referred for a bone densitometry examination. Duplicate Lexxos measurements were performed in 27 female patients to evaluate precision. On average, Lexxos spine and femoral neck BMD measurements were 2% lower than those on the QDR-4500, whereas total hip BMD was 5% higher. Larger differences were found for the trochanter and Wards triangle regions. For all sites, Lexxos BMD measurements showed a strong linear relationship with those measured on the QDR-4500 with correlation coefficients in the range r = 0.95 to 0.97 for the clinically important spine, femoral neck, and total hip regions. The root mean standard error (RMSE) between Lexxos and QDR-4500 BMDs ranged from 0.037 g/cm² for the femoral neck to 0.060 g/cm² for the spine, whereas Lexxos precision was 1.3% for total hip, 2.0% for femoral neck, and 2.3% for spine BMD. Although for the hip BMD sites the RMSE and precision of Lexxos measurements were similar to studies of pencil-beam and fan-beam DXA systems, the results for the spine were poorer than expected. The findings of this study suggest that Lexxos corrects accurately for the effects of scattered radiation at the detector, but that the precision of spine BMD measurements may be limited by involuntary patient movement between the high and low energy X-ray exposures.     

Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro

Bone mineral measurements with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were compared with chemical analysis (ChA) to determine (1) the accuracy and (2) the influence of bone marrow fat. Total bone mass of 19 human femoral necks in vitro was determined with QCT and DXA before and after defatting. ChA consisted of defatting and decalcification of the femoral neck samples for determination of bone mineral mass (BmM) and amount of fat. The mean BmM was 4.49 g. Mean fat percentage was 37.2% (23.3%–48.5%). QCT, DXA and ChA before and after defatting were all highly correlated (r>0.96,p<0.0001). Before defatting the QCT values were on average 0.35 g less than BmM and the DXA values were on average 0.65 g less than BmM. After defatting, all bone mass values increased; QCT values were on average 0.30 g more than BmM and DXA values were 0.29 g less than BmM. It is concluded that bone mineral measurements of the femoral neck with QCT and DXA are highly correlated with the chemically determined bone mineral mass and that both techniques are influenced by the femoral fat content.