Anterior gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Background: Although laparoscopic repair of type 3 paraesophageal hernias is safe and results in symptomatic relief, recent data have questioned the anatomic integrity of the laparoscopic approach. The reports document an asymptomatic recurrence rate as high as 42% with radiologic follow-up evaluation for type 3 paraesophageal hernias repaired laparoscopically. This disturbingly high recurrence rate has prompted the addition of an anterior gastropexy to our standard laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Methods: A prospective series of 28 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of large type 3 hiatal hernias between July 2000 and January 2002 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation by one surgeon. All the patients underwent reduction of the hernia, sac excision, crural repair, antireflux procedure, and anterior gastropexy. They all had a video esophagram 24 h after surgery, then at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits and annually thereafter. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed with a standard questionnaire at each follow-up visit. Results: In this study, 21 women and 7 men with a mean age of 67 years (range, 35–82 years) underwent successful laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. The mean operative time was 146 min (range, 101–186 min), and the average blood loss was 71 ml (range, 10–200 ml). One intraoperative complication occurred: A small esophageal mucosal tear occurred during esophageal dissection and was repaired laparoscopically. At 24 h, upper gastrointestinal examination identified no leaks. At this writing, all the patients have undergone video esophagram at a 3-month follow-up visit. All were asymptomatic and all examinations were normal. Of the 28 patients, 27 have undergone follow-up assessment at 6 months. At this writing, all the patients have undergone video esophagram at 3, 6, and 12 months follow up visits. All were asymptomatic and all examinations were normal. Ten patients have completed 2 year follow up barium swallows with no recurrences. Conclusions: With up to 2 years of follow-up evaluation, the addition of an anterior gastropexy to the laparoscopic repair of type 3 hiatal hernias resulted in no recurrences. These encouraging results necessitate further follow-up evaluation to document the long-term effects of anterior gastropexy in reducing postoperative recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias.     

Laparoscopic management of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia

Background: Large paraesophageal hernias (POHs) predominantly occur in the elderly population. Early repair is recommended to avoid the risks associated with gastric volvulus. Methods: Data were collected prospectively during an 8-year period. Laparoscopic repair of POHs initially included circumcision of the sac and mesh hiatal repair. Sac excision and suture hiatal repair were later adopted. A fundoplication was also included, initially as a selective procedure. Results: Fifty-three patients with large POHs were treated by one surgeon. All had attempted laparoscopic repair, with four conversions to an open procedure. Symptomatic hernia recurrence occurred in five patients (9%). The 21 patients who had sac excision, hiatal repair, and fundoplication have remained free of symptomatic recurrence. The postoperative morbidity rate was 13%, with one death. Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of large POHs remains feasible. We advocate complete sac excision, hiatal repair, fundoplication, and gastropexy to prevent early recurrence.     

Prosthetic mesh repair of large and recurrent diaphragmatic hernias

Background Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernias (PEH) is associated with significant recurrence rates. Use of prosthetic mesh to complete tension-free repair of the hiatus has been suggested to decrease the recurrence rate. Methods Fifty-nine patients with large (n = 44) or recurrent (n = 15) PEH were operated on via the laparoscopic approach with the use of prosthetic mesh. Patients were followed with office visits and phone interviews. All patients were referred for barium studies. Data analysis included all patients, including conversions, on an intention-to-treat basis. Results Followup was completed in 56 (95%) patients. Mean followup time was 28.4 months. Forty patients (74%) had significant relief of all symptoms. Barium studies were performed in 45 patients (80.3%), including all symptomatic patients. Fifteen patients (33%) had a small sliding hernia, six (13.3%) had recurrent PEH, and four (8.8%) had narrowing of the gastroesophageal junction. Most patients with small hiatal hernias were symptomatic (60%). All responded to medical treatment. Conclusions Laparoscopic repair of large PEH with reinforcement mesh is feasible and safe with excellent short-term results. Long-term followup shows a low PEH recurrence requiring reoperation, but a significant number of patients develop symptomatic recurrent small hiatal hernias that can be managed nonoperatively. Presented at the 14th European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons International Congress, 13–16 September 2006, Berlin, Germany     

Long-Term Results (6–10 Years) of Laparoscopic Fundoplication

Most papers report excellent results of laparoscopic fundoplication but with relatively short follow-up. Only few studies have a follow-up longer than 5 years. We prospectively collected data of 399 consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or large paraesophageal/mixed hiatal hernia who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication between January 1992 and June 2005. Preoperative workup included symptoms questionnaire, videoesophagogram, upper endoscopy, manometry, and pH-metry. Postoperative clinical/functional studies were performed at 1, 6, 12 months, and thereafter every other year. Patients were divided into four groups: GERD with nonerosive esophagitis, erosive esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus, and large paraesophageal/mixed hiatal hernia. Surgical failures were considered as follows: (1) recurrence of GERD symptoms or abnormal 24-h pH monitoring; (2) recurrence of endoscopic esophagitis; (3) recurrence of hiatal hernia/slipped fundoplication on endoscopy/barium swallow; (4) postoperative onset of dysphagia; (5) postoperative onset of gas bloating. One hundred and forty-five patients (87 M:58 F) were operated between January 1992 and June 1999: 80 nonerosive esophagitis, 29 erosive esophagitis, 17 Barrett’s esophagus, and 19 large paraesophageal/mixed hiatal hernias. At a median follow-up of 97 months, the success rate was 74% for surgery only and 86% for primary surgery and ‘complementary’ treatments (21 patients: 13 redo surgery and eight endoscopic dilations). Dysphagia and recurrence of reflux were the most frequent causes of failure for nonerosive esophagitis patients; recurrence of hernia was prevalent among patients with large paraesophageal/mixed hiatal hernia. Gas bloating (causing failure) was reported by nonerosive esophagitis patients only. At last follow-up, 115 patients were off ‘proton-pump inhibitors’; 30 were still on medications (eight for causes unrelated to GERD). Conclusion confirms that laparoscopic fundoplication provides effective, long-term treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Hernia recurrence and dysphagia are its weak points.     

Clinical and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Background: Unlike sliding hiatal hernias, paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEH) present a risk of catastrophic complications and should be repaired. To assess laparoscopic repair of PEH, we prospectively evaluated the outcome of 38 consecutive patients with type II (20 patients) or III (18 patients) PEH treated laparoscopically. Methods: With the use of 5 or 6 ports, laparoscopic PEH reduction and repair was attempted. One patient (3%) was converted to an open procedure. In the first 12 patients, the hiatus was closed using varying techniques including the placement of prothestic mesh in 6 patients, and the hernia sac was not routinely excised. In the next 25 patients, the hernia sac always was excised and the hiatus routinely sutured posteriorly to the esophagus. Twenty-nine patients also underwent either a Nissen (n= 27) or Toupet (n= 2) fundoplication, which is now performed routinely. Sutured anterior gastropexy was performed selectively in 10 of the first 20 patients, then routinely, using T-fasteners in the last 17 patients. Barium swallow studies were performed on all patients at 3 to 5 months postoperatively. Results: Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) age was 67 ± 2 year (range, 39–92 years; 11 men, 27 women), and the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score was 2.5 ± 0.1. The operating time was 195 ± 10 min: 244 ± 15 min in the first 12 patients and 170 ± 11 min in the last 25 patients (p < 0.001). There were three (8%) intraoperation complications, which were treated without sequelae, and four (11%) grade II postoperation morbidities. Median discharge was 3 days, and return to full activity was 14 days. Two patients (5%) died of cardiovascular disease after discharge. Barium swallow revealed 2/35 (6%) PEH recurrences (1 reoperated), 3 (9%) intrathoracic wraps, and 3 (9%) small sliding hiatal hernias. At follow-up of 1 year or more, 6/28 (21%) patients noted mild symptoms of reflux or bloating, but only 1 patient (4%) required medication for these symptoms. Conclusions: Laparoscopic PEH repair offers a reasonable alternative to traditional surgery, especially for high-risk patients. Rapid recovery is achieved with acceptable morbidity and early outcome. Barium x-rays revealed hiatal abnormalities in a significant fraction of patients, many of whom were asymptomatic. Longer follow-up will be required to determine the ideal strategy for management of these patients. Received: 4 April 1998/Accepted: 9 December 1998     

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia

Large paraesophageal hernias are generally repaired by reduction of the stomach into the abdomen, sac excision, crural closure, and gastropexy or fundoplication. After gaining experience performing laparoscopic repair of sliding hiatal hernias and Nissen fundoplication we combined laparoscopic access with traditional surgical technique in treating patients with complex paraesophageal hernias.Ten adults, six males and four females, with type III paraesophageal hernias underwent laparoscopic repair between February 1993 and April 1994. The average age of the patients was 60.4 years (range 38–81). Using five ports (three 10 mm and two 5 mm), the stomach was reduced into the abdomen, the hernia sac was resected, and the defect was closed with pledgeted horizontal mattress sutures. In addition, nine patients had a Nissen fundoplication performed and one patient had a diaphragmatic gastropexy.The procedure was completed laparoscopically in all ten cases and the median operating time was 282 min (range 165–430). Two complications occurred, an intraoperative gastric laceration, and a postoperative mediastinal seroma. All patients were discharged on the 2nd or 3rd postoperative day. Eight of nine patients were asymptomatic at last follow-up (mean 8.9 months postop). One patient has mild dysphagia and heartburn from partial migration of the fundoplication into the chest. One patient died 3 months postoperatively of unrelated causes. Paraesophageal hernia can be reduced and repaired safely with laparoscopic access using standard surgical techniques.Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastro-intestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 18–19 April 1994     

Critical evaluation of a novel DualMesh repair for large hiatal hernias

Background  The use of mesh for laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias may reduce recurrence rates in comparison to primary suture repair. However, there is a potential risk of mesh-related oesophageal complications due to prosthesis erosion. The aim of this study was to critically evaluate a novel mesh (DualMesh) repair of hiatal hernias with particular reference to intraluminal erosion. Method  Medical records of 19 patients who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with DualMesh reinforcement of the crural closure were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. Quality of life and symptom analysis was performed using quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaires pre- and postoperatively after 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Barium studies were performed on patients pre-operatively and two years postoperatively to assess hernia recurrence. After 2 years, oesophagogastric endoscopy was performed to assess signs of erosion. Results  Mean patient age was 70.5 years (range 49–85 years). Two years after hiatal hernia repair, there was significant improvement in quality-of-life scores (QOLRAD: p < 0.001). Follow-up barium studies performed at 31.3 months (range 29–40 months) after surgery showed moderate recurrent hernias (>4 cm) in 1/14 patients (7%). Endoscopies performed at 34.4 months (range 28–41 months) after surgery did not show any signs of prosthetic erosion. Conclusion  Laparoscopic reinforcement of primary hiatal closure with DualMesh leads to a durable repair in patients with large hiatal hernias. Long-term endoscopic follow-up did not show any signs of mesh erosion after prosthetic reinforcement of the crural repair.     

Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia with polytetrafluoroethylene

Background: Several studies have shown that large hiatal hernias are associated with a high recurrence rate. Despite the problem of recurrence, the technique of hiatal herniorrhaphy has not changed appreciably since its inception. In this 3-year study we have evaluated laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in individuals with a hernia defect greater than 8 cm in diameter. Methods: A series of 35 patients with sliding or paraesophageal hiatal hernias was prospectively randomized to hiatal hernia repair with (n= 17) or without (n= 18) polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). All patients had an endoscopic and radiographic diagnosis of large hiatal hernia. Both repairs were performed by using interrupted stitches to approximate the crurae. In the group randomized to repair with prosthesis, PTFE mesh with a 3-cm ``keyhole' was positioned around the gastroesophageal junction with the esophagus through the keyhole. The PTFE was stapled to the diaphragm and crura with a hernia stapler. Results: Patients were followed with EGD and esophagogram at 3 months postoperatively, and with esophagogram every 6 months thereafter. Individuals with PTFE had a longer operation time, but the 2-day hospital stay was the same in both groups. The cost of the repair was $1050 ± $135 more in the group with the prosthesis. There were two complications (1 pneumonia, 1 urinary retention) in the group repaired with PTFE and one complication (pneumothorax) in the group without prosthesis. The group without PTFE was notable for three (16.7%) recurrences within the first 6 months of surgery. Conclusion: On the basis of these preliminary results it appears that repair with PTFE may confer an advantage, with lower rates of recurrence in patients with large hiatal hernia defects. Received: 1 May 1998/Accepted: 22 December 1998     

Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia

Background: Laparoscopic hernia repair excites controversy because its benefits are debatable and critics claim it is attended by serious complications. The one group of patients in whom benefits may outweigh the perceived disadvantages are those with bilateral or recurrent inguinal hernias. Method: One hundred twenty patients with bilateral or recurrent hernias were randomized to either laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or open mesh repair. Patients completed a well-being questionnaire prior to and following surgery together with a visual analog pain score. Patients were followed up clinically at 1 and 3 months and thereafter by their general practitioner. Results: Age and sex distribution was similar in the two groups. Laparoscopic TAPP hernia was quicker (40 vs 55 min; p < 0.001), less painful (visual analog pain score, 2.8 vs 4.3; p = 0.003) and allowed earlier return to work (11 vs 42 days; p < 0.001) compared to open mesh repair. Conclusion: This trial demonstrates that laparoscopic hernia repair via the TAPP route offers significant benefit to patients undergoing bilateral or recurrent inguinal hernia repair.     

Laparoscopic repair of parahiatal hernias with mesh: a retrospective study

Background  Parahiatal hernias are very rare and distinct entities, the diagnosis of which is never made clinically. Laparoscopic repair has been reported in the literature. We present our experiences with the laparoscopic repair of this uncommon type of hernia. Patients and methods  In our institute, we retrospectively identified a total of eight patients with parahiatal hernias from 1999 to 2007, of which four had primary and four had secondary defects. Laparoscopic crural repair was performed for all of the patients, fundoplication wherever indicated and meshplasty in the cases with large defects. Gastropexy was performed for the patient with volvulus. Results  The male:female ratio was 5:3, with a mean age of 46 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.3 kg/m². The mean size of the defects was 18 cm². The mean blood loss during surgery was 50 ml, the mean operative time was 103.5 min and the mean hospital stay was 4 days. One patient had the recurrence of symptoms 1 month after surgery. There were no conversions, recurrences or mortality. Discussion  Primary parahiatal hernias occur as a result of a congenital weakness and secondary defects follow hiatal surgery. The use of a mesh is advisable for large defects and defects of primary type. Secondary hernias following fundoplication do not need a redo fundoplication, but require an adequate crural repair with mesh. Laparoscopic repair of these uncommon hernias is safe, effective and provides all of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.     

Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: An 11-year experience

Incisional hernias develop in 2%–20% of laparotomy incisions, necessitating approximately 90,000 ventral hernia repairs per year. Although a common general surgical problem, a "best" method for repair has yet to be identified, as evidenced by documented recurrence rates of 25%–52% with primary open repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ventral and incisional herniorrhaphy. From February 1991 through November 2002, a total of 384 patients were treated by laparoscopic technique for primary and recurrent umbilical hernias, ventral incisional hernias, and spigelian hernias. The technique was essentially the same for each procedure and involved lysis of adhesions, reduction of hernia contents, closure of the defect, and 3–5 cm circumferential mesh coverage of all hernias. Of the 384 patients in our study group, there were 212 females and 172 males with a mean age of 58.3 years (range 27–100 years). Ninety-six percent of the hernia repairs were completed laparoscopically. Mean operating time was 68 min (range 14–405 min), and estimated average blood loss was 25 mL (range 10–200 mL). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.9 days and ranged from same-day discharge to 36 days. The overall postoperative complication rate was 10.1%. There have been 11 recurrences (2.9%) during a mean follow-up time of 47.1 months (range 1–141 months). Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair, based on the Rives-Stoppa technique, is a safe, feasible, and effective alternative to open techniques. More long-term follow-up is still required to further evaluate the true effectiveness of this operation.     

Preliminary study of hiatal hernia repair using polyglycolic acid: trimethylene carbonate mesh

Background:

Repairing large hiatal hernias using mesh has been shown to reduce recurrence. Drawbacks to mesh include added time to place and secure the prosthesis as well as complications such as esophageal erosion. We used a laparoscopic technique for repair of hiatal hernias (HH) >5cm, incorporating primary crural repair with onlay fixation of a synthetic polyglycolicacid:trimethylene carbonate (PGA:TMC) absorbable tissue reinforcement. The purpose of this report is to present short-term follow-up data.

Methods:

Patients with hiatal hernia types I-III and defects >5cm were included. Primary closure of the hernia defect was performed using interrupted nonpledgeted sutures, followed by PGA:TMC mesh onlay fixed with absorbable tacks. A fundoplication was then performed. Evaluation of patients was carried out at routine follow-up visits. Outcomes measured were symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or other symptoms suspicious for recurrence. Patients exhibiting these complaints underwent further evaluation including radiographic imaging and endoscopy.

Results:

Follow-up data were analyzed on 11 patients. Two patients were male; 9 were female. The mean age was 60 years. The mean length of follow-up was 13 months. There were no complications related to the mesh. One patient suffered from respiratory failure, one from gas bloat syndrome, and another had a superficial port-site infection. One patient developed a recurrent hiatal hernia.

Conclusions:

In this small series, laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias >5cm with onlay fixation of PGA:TMC tissue reinforcement has short-term outcomes with a reasonably low recurrence rate. However, due to the preliminary and nonrandomized nature of the data, no strong comparison can be made with other types of mesh repairs. Additional data collection is warranted.     

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using an anatomically contoured three-dimensional mesh

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair frequently is performed with mechanical fixation of a flat polypropylene mesh. Mechanical fixation is associated with pain syndromes, and mesh migration may occur without fixation of flat prostheses. An anatomically contoured mesh (3D Max; Davol, Cranston, RI, USA) using no or minimal fixation would avoid these problems. Methods: A retrospective case study reviewed 212 transabdominal preperitoneal herniaplasties with 11 × 16-cm 3D Max mesh in 146 patients. Fixation with three helical tacks at the most was used early or with very large defects. Results: Fixation was used in 19% of the cases, but only for 1 of the last 98 patients. As reported, 94% of the patients returned to normal activities by 3 weeks, 97% returned to unrestricted sports by 6 weeks, and 92% complete recovery from surgery by 9 weeks. Fixation or bilateral repair did not alter recovery. Four patients had minor pain or numbness. Symptomatic recurrence was 0%. One asymptomatic indirect recurrence was noted on examination, during a mean follow-up period of 23 months, yielding a 0.55% hernia rate and a 0.42% patient-year recurrence risk. Conclusions: An anatomically contoured mesh for transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair often requires no fixation, with minimal risk of neuropathy and less than a 0.5% patient-year recurrence rate. Recovery is excellent even with bilateral repair or some fixation. Financial support for this study was provided by Davol, Inc., Cranst, USA     

Combined treatment of symptomatic massive paraesophageal hernia in the morbidly obese

Introduction:

Repair of large paraesophageal hernias by itself is associated with high failure rates in the morbidly obese. A surgical approach addressing both giant paraesophageal hernia and morbid obesity has, to our knowledge, not been explored in the surgical literature.

Methods:

A retrospective review of a bariatric surgery database identified patients who underwent simultaneous repair of large type 3 paraesophageal hernias with primary crus closure and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Operative time, intraoperative and 30-day morbidity, weight loss, resolution of comorbid conditions and use of anti-reflux medication were outcome measures. Integrity of crural closure was studied with a barium swallow.

Results:

Three patients with a mean body mass index of 46kg/m² and mean age of 46 years underwent repair of a large paraesophageal hernia, primary crus closure, and RYGB. Mean operative time was 241 minutes and length of stay was 4 days. There was no intraoperative or 30-day morbidity. One patient required endoscopic balloon dilatation of the gastrojejunostomy. At 12 months, all patients were asymptomatic with excellent weight loss and resolution of comorbidities. Contrast studies showed no recurrence of the hiatal hernia.

Conclusion:

Simultaneous laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernias in the morbidly obese is safe and effective.     

Simultaneous laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese

BackgroundMorbid obesity is associated with increased rates of hiatal and paraesophageal hernias. Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gaining popularity as the procedure of choice for morbid obesity, there is little data regarding the management of paraesophageal hernias found intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of a combined sleeve gastrectomy and paraesophageal hernia repair in morbidly obese patients.MethodsFrom May 2011 to February 2013, 23 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with the repair of a paraesophageal hernia. Only 4 patients had a large hiatal hernia documented preoperatively on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The body mass index (BMI), operative time, length of stay, and complications were evaluated.ResultsThe average operative time was 165 minutes (115–240 minutes) and length of stay was 2.83 days (2–6 days). All patients were female except for one, with an average age of 53.4 years and a BMI of 41.9 kg/m². There were no complications during the procedures. Mean follow-up was 6.16 months (1–19 months), and mean excess weight loss was 39%. The average cost of admission for a combined procedure ($10,056), was slightly higher than a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ($8905) or laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair ($8954) done separately.ConclusionsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with a paraesophageal hernia repair is well-tolerated and feasible in morbidly obese patients. Surgeons should be aware that preoperative EGD is not effective at diagnosing large hiatal or paraesophageal hernias. Surgeons with the skill set to repair paraesophageal hernias should do a combined procedure because it is well-tolerated, feasible, and can reduce the cost of multiple hospital admissions.     

Surgical repair of recurrent hiatal hernia

The surgical management results of recurrent hiatal hernia repair are unknown in the laparoscopic era. The experience of the senior authors (CJF) and (SKM) is reported herein. From 1993 to 2004, 52 patients underwent re-operative hiatal hernia surgery at our center. Preoperative symptoms were heartburn, chest pain, dysphagia, regurgitation and pulmonary manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients had preoperative evaluation by upper endoscopy, pH-monitoring, esophagogram and manometry to assess the mechanism of failure. Pre- and postoperative symptoms were assessed utilizing a standardized questionnaire. Patients underwent laparoscopic repair (n=18), open laparotomy (n=6) and transthoracic surgery (n=28). Ninety-five percent follow-up was achieved with a mean follow-up of 34 months. Thirty-seven percent of patients encountered para-operative complications one of them died due to respiratory insufficiency. Five patients experienced a re-recurrent hernia. The symptom resolution was 65% for dysphagia, 68% for heartburn, 95% for chest pain and 79% for regurgitation. The overall patient satisfaction was 6.94 on a scale of 1–10. There was no significant difference in patient outcome when comparing the operative approaches or disease process. Surgical repair of recurrent hiatal hernias is safe and effective. Laparoscopic surgery is an appropriate alternative approach for recurrent hiatal hernia repair in selected patients.     

Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation

Background: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia (LRPEH) is a feasible and effective technique. There have been some recent concerns regarding possible high recurrence rates following laparoscopic repair. Methods: We reviewed our experience with LRPEH from 5/1996 to 8/2002. Large paraesophageal hernia (PEH) was defined by the presence of more than one-third of the stomach in the thoracic cavity. Principles of repair included reduction of the hernia, excision of the sac, approximation of the crura, and fundoplication. Pre- and postoperative symptoms were evaluated utilizing visual analogue scores (VAS) on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were followed with VAS and barium esophagram studies. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Students t-test. Results: A total of 166 patients with a mean age of 68 years underwent LRPEH. PEH were type II (n = 43), type III (n = 104), and type IV (n = 19). Mean operative time was 160 min. Fundoplications were Nissen (127), Toupet (23), Dor (1), and Nissen-Collis (1). Fourteen patients underwent a gastropexy. One patient required early reoperation to repair an esophageal leak. Mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. At 24 months postoperatively there was statistically significant improvement in the mean symptom scores: heartburn from 6.8 to 0.5, regurgitation from 5.9 to 0.3, dysphagia from 4.0 to 0.5, chest pain from 3.7 to 0.3. Radiographic surveillance was obtained in 120 patients (72%) at a mean of 15 months postoperatively. Six patients (5%) had radiographic evidence of a recurrent paraesophageal hernia (two required surgery), 24 patients (20%) had a sliding hernia (two required surgery), and four patients (3.3%) had wrap failure (all four required surgery). Reoperation was required in 10 patients (6%); two for symptomatic recurrent PEH (1.2%), four for recurrent reflux symptoms (2.4%), and four for dysphagia (2.4%). Patients with abnormal postoperative barium esophagram studies who did not require reoperation have remained asymptomatic at a mean follow up of 14 months. Conclusion: LPEHR is a safe and effective treatment for PEH. Postoperative radiographic abnormalities, such as a small sliding hernia, are often seen. The clinical importance of these findings is questionable, since only a small percentage of patients require reoperation. True PEH recurrences are uncommon and frequently asymptomatic. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Los Angeles, CA, USA, March 2003     

Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia with teres ligament: midterm follow-up

Background Although laparoscopic repair of large, mostly paraesophageal hiatal hernias is widely applied, there is a great concern regarding the higher recurrence rate associated with this procedure. In order to reduce this high recurrence rate, several techniques have been developed, mostly applying a mesh prosthesis for hiatal reinforcement. Methods We have recently introduced a new laparoscopic technique in which the hiatal closure is reinforced with the teres ligament. To date 26 patients have been entered into this ongoing prospective study. After the operation patients were called back on a regular basis for symptom evaluation and barium swallow. All 26 patients agreed to undergo barium swallow, with a mean follow-up of 35 months. Results The mean operative time was 115 min. Perioperative morbidity was 11.5%, and conversion to an open procedure was performed in six cases. No mortality was registered. Anatomic recurrence, investigated by barium swallows was observed in four patients (15.3%). Of those four, only one (3.85%) had a symptomatic recurrent paraesophageal hernia; the other three had asymptomtic sliding hernias. In three of the four patients with anatomic recurrence, the diameter of the hiatal hernia was greater than 9 cm at the original operation, and the fourth patient underwent reoperation for recurrent hiatal hernia. No symptomatic recurrence was found in patients with diameter of hiatal hernia between 6 and 9 cm. Conclusions Laparoscopic reinforcement of the hiatal closure with the ligamentum teres is safe and effective treatment for large hiatal hernias. However, it appears that patients with extremely large hiatal hernias are at greater risk of recurrence, and therefore large hernias are not suitable for this new technique.     

The laparoscopic reoperation of failed Heller myotomy

Background: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia has a 10–20% failure rate and may require reoperation to control persistent, or recurrent symptoms of dysphagia. We report our experience with laparoscopic reoperation for failed Heller myotomy. Methods: Between 1996 and 2001, 5 patients underwent reoperative laparoscopic Heller myotomy. The mean age was 39 years. The presenting symptoms were persistent dysphagia (n = 3), recurrent dysphagia (n = 1), and weight loss (n = 1). The mean duration between 1st surgery and recurrence of symptoms was 2 months and the mean duration between surgeries was 27.5 months. All operations were completed laparoscopically. Results: There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Incomplete gastric myotomy was the cause of all 5 primary surgical failures. The mean hospital stay was 2 days. Mean follow-up was 12.8 months. Results were excellent in 2 patients who reported no dysphagia postoperatively (dysphagia grade 0) and good in 3 patients (60%) who all reported improvement in swallowing (dysphagia grade I–II). Conclusion: Laparoscopic reoperation for failed Heller myotomy is feasible with encouraging preliminary results.     

Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications

Background Little grade A medical evidence exists to support the use of prosthetic material for hiatal closure. Therefore, the authors compiled and analyzed all the available literature to determine whether the use of prosthetic mesh in hiatoplasty for routine laparoscopic fundoplications (LF) or for the repair of large (>5 cm) paraesophageal hernias (PEH) would decrease recurrence. Methods A literature search was performed using an inclusive list of relevant search terms via Medline/PubMed to identify papers (n = 19) describing the use of prosthetic material to repair the crura of patients undergoing laparoscopic PEH reduction, LF, or both. Results Case series (n = 5), retrospective reviews (n = 6), and prospective randomized (n = 4) and nonrandomized (n = 4) trials were identified. Laparoscopic procedures (n = 1,368) were performed for PEH, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), hiatal hernia, or a combination of the three. Group A (n = 729) had primary suture repair of the crura, and group B (n = 639) had repair with either interposition of mesh to close the hiatus or onlay of prosthetic material after hiatal or crural closure. The use of mesh was associated with fewer recurrences than primary suture repair in both the LF and PEH groups. The mean follow-up period did not differ between the groups (20.7 months for group A vs. 19.2 months for group B). None of the papers cited any instance of prosthetic erosion into the gastrointestinal tract. Conclusions The current data tend to support the use of prosthetic materials for hiatal repair in both routine LF and the repair of large PEHs. Longer and more stringent follow-up evaluation is necessary to delineate better the safety profile of mesh hiatoplasty. Future randomized trials are needed to confirm that mesh repair is superior to simple crural closure.