Aprotinin protects platelets against the initial effect of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Remarkable improvement in hemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass has been achieved by treatment with the proteinase inhibitor aprotinin, but the mechanism is still unclear. The present study is designed to elucidate the importance of platelet adhesive (glycoprotein Ib) or aggregatory (glycoprotein IIbIIIa) receptors on this hemostatic function in cardiopulmonary bypass and its improvement by aprotinin treatment. To determine whether the first pass of blood through the circuit or a continuous proteolytic attack is the main cause of platelet damage, we gave two different dose regimens of aprotinin treatment to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Part I of the study consisted of a double-blind trial on 60 patients. Patients received placebo or aprotinin infusion (total 6.10(6) KIU) before and during bypass. A consecutive group of 22 matching patients received one single bolus of aprotinin in the pump prime (2.10(6) KIU). Blood samples were collected before and during operation to assess the effect of bypass and aprotinin on platelets and the activation of the various proteases in relation to hemostasis expressed in blood loss and blood requirements. The adhesive platelet membrane Ib glycoproteins were decreased by 50% in the untreated patients within 5 minutes of cardiopulmonary bypass and remained low during bypass, whereas glycoprotein Ib did not decrease in either group of aprotinin-treated patients. The platelet membrane IIbIIIa glycoproteins did not significantly change during bypass in either group, but fibrinogen binding to these receptors improved significantly in the 6.10(6) KIU aprotinin-treated group at the end of bypass as compared with initial values. The high continuous dose of 6.10(6) KIU aprotinin inhibited the clotting and kallikrein/kinin system throughout the operation; the pump prime dose of 2.10(6) KIU inhibited these systems only initially. Although the fibrinolytic activity was effectively inhibited in both aprotinin groups, fibrinolytic activity became apparent only at the end phase of bypass in the placebo group. However, improved hemostasis was observed intraoperatively from the start of bypass and resulted in a 40% lower blood loss intraoperatively and postoperatively and consequently a 40% lower total blood requirement in the aprotinin-treated patients than in the untreated patients. Our results therefore demonstrate that the improved hemostasis during and after bypass in patients treated with aprotinin has specifically to be attributed to a preserved adhesive capacity of platelets that was affected in the first pass of blood through the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.     

Effects of minimal dose aprotinin on blood loss and fibrinolytic system-complement activation in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

BACKGROUND: To determine whether 500,000 KIU aprotinin is effective to reduce blood loss in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to evaluate the effects of this regimen on hematologic parameters. METHODS: Forty-four patients scheduled for primary CABG were randomly assigned to the aprotinin (n = 24) or control group (n = 20). In aprotinin group, aprotinin was administered in two equal doses (before skin incision and added to the pump prime). Ventilation time, intensive care unit stay, mediastinal tube drainage, hospitalization, transfusion requirements, and postoperative morbidities and mortality were noted. Hematologic markers of fibrinolytic activity and complement activation were also measured pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Although less mediastinal drainage occurred in aprotinin group, the difference was not statistically significant. Other postoperative variables like transfusion requirements, morbidities, and mortality were also found to be similar between groups. Among hematologic parameters, only postoperative levels of alpha2-antiplasmin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 were significantly higher in aprotinin group. CONCLUSIONS: Although plasmin inhibitors begin to rise at this very low aprotinin dosage, it is not advisable to use this aprotinin regimen in CABG patients.     

Plasma concentrations of nitric oxide products and cognitive dysfunction following coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prospective longitudinal studies now indicate that cognitive dysfunction following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is both common and persistent. This dysfunction is due in part to the inflammatory response and cerebral ischaemia-reperfusion, with nitric oxide (NO) as an important mediator of both. We hypothesized that a clinically significant association exists between plasma concentrations of nitrate/nitrite (NO3-/NO2-) and cognitive dysfunction after CABG. METHODS: Cognitive assessment was performed on 36 adult patients the day before CABG, on the fourth postoperative day and 3 months postoperatively. Patient spouses (n = 10) were also studied. RESULTS: A new cognitive deficit was present in 22/36 (62%) 4 days postoperatively and in 16/35 (49%) of patients, 3 months postoperatively. Patients who had cognitive dysfunction 3 months postoperatively were more likely to have cognitive dysfunction and increased plasma NO3-/NO2- concentrations compared to the non-deficit group preoperatively (22.6 (9.2) vs. 27.6 (8.4)) (P = 0.002). Plasma NOx (NO3- plus NO2-) concentrations were greater in patients with cognitive dysfunction 3 months postoperatively, 2 h (24.2 (6.3) vs. 19.1 (5.2)) (P = 0.002), and 12 h postoperatively (24.8 (7.6) vs. 18.8 (5.6)) (P = 0.001). There was, however, a time course similarity in NOx elevations for both deficit and non-deficit groups. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative plasma NOx concentrations do not serve as an effective biomarker of cognitive deficit after CABG.     

Aprotinin reduces blood loss in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Effects of aprotinin in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery have not yet been described. This study analyses hemostasiologic changes and potential benefit in OPCAB patients treated with aprotinin. METHODS: In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study 47 patients undergoing OPCAB surgery were investigated. Patients received either aprotinin (2 x 10(6) KIU loading dose and 0.5 x 10(6) KIU/h during surgery, n=22) or saline solution (control, n=25). Activated clotting time was adjusted to a target of 250 s intraoperatively. Blood samples were taken up to 18h postoperatively: complete hematologic and hemostasiologic parameters including fibrinopeptide A (FPA) and D-dimer in a subgroup of 31 patients were analyzed. Blood loss, blood transfusion and other clinical data were collected. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable demographic and intraoperative variables. Forty-one (87%) patients of the whole study group received aspirin within 7 days prior to surgery. Number of grafts per patient were comparable (2.9+/-1.0 [mean+/-SD] in the aprotinin group and 2.8+/-1.2 in control, P=0.83). Blood loss during the first 18 h in intensive care unit was significantly reduced in patients treated with aprotinin (median [25th-75th percentiles]: 500 [395-755] ml vs. 930 [800-1170] ml, P<0.001). Postoperatively only two patients (10%) in the aprotinin group received packed red blood cells, whereas eight (35%) in the control group (P=0.07). Perioperatively FPA levels reflecting thrombin generation were elevated in both groups. The increase in D-dimer levels after surgery was significantly inhibited in the aprotinin group (P<0.001). Early clinical outcome was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin significantly reduces blood loss in patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. Inhibition of enhanced fibrinolysis can be observed. FPA generation during and after OPCAB surgery seems not to be influenced by aprotinin.     

Reduction of myocardial reperfusion injury by aprotinin after regional ischemia and cardioplegic arrest

BACKGROUND: Surgical coronary revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia has been associated with reperfusion injury. The serine protease inhibitor aprotinin has been suggested to reduce reperfusion injury, yet a clinically relevant study examining regional ischemia under conditions of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia has not been performed. METHODS: Pigs were subjected to 30 minutes of regional myocardial ischemia by distal left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion, followed by 60 minutes of cardiopulmonary bypass with 45 minutes of cardioplegic arrest and 90 minutes of post-cardiopulmonary bypass reperfusion. The treatment group (n = 6) was administered aprotinin systemically (40,000 kallikrein-inhibiting units [KIU]/kg intravenous loading dose, 40,000 KIU/kg pump prime, and 10,000 KIU x kg(-1) x h(-1) intravenous continuous infusion). Control animals (n = 6) received crystalloid solution. Global and regional myocardial functions were analyzed by the left ventricular+dP/dt and the percentage segment shortening, respectively. Left ventricular infarct size was measured by tetrazolium staining. Tissue myeloperoxidase activity was measured. Myocardial sections were immunohistochemically stained for nitrotyrosine. Coronary microvessel function was studied by videomicroscopy. RESULTS: Myocardial infarct size was decreased with aprotinin treatment (27.0% +/- 3.5% vs 45.3% +/- 3.0%, aprotinin vs control; P <.05). Myocardium from the ischemic territory showed diminished nitrotyrosine staining in aprotinin-treated animals versus controls, and this was significant by grade (1.3 +/- 0.2 vs 3.2 +/- 0.2, aprotinin vs control; P <.01). In the aprotinin group, coronary microvessel relaxation improved most in response to the endothelium-dependent agonist adenosine diphosphate (44.7% +/- 3.2% vs 19.7% +/- 1.7%, aprotinin vs control; P <.01). No significant improvements in myocardial function were observed with aprotinin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin reduces reperfusion injury after regional ischemia and cardioplegic arrest. Protease inhibition may represent a molecular strategy to prevent postoperative myocardial injury after surgical revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Influence of high-dose aprotinin treatment on blood loss and coagulation patterns in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.

Intraoperative administration of the proteinase inhibitor aprotinin causes reduction in blood loss and homologous blood requirement in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To ascertain the blood-saving effect of aprotinin and to obtain further information about the mode of action, 40 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization were randomly assigned to receive either aprotinin or placebo treatment. Aprotinin was given as a bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU) before surgery followed by a continuous infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h during surgery. Additionally, 2 x 10(6) KIU were added to the pump prime. Strict criteria were used to obtain a homogeneous patient selection. Total blood loss was reduced from 1,431 +/- 760 ml in the control group to 738 +/- 411 ml in the aprotinin group (P less than 0.05) and the homologous blood requirement from 838 +/- 963 ml to 163 +/- 308 ml (P less than 0.05). In the control group, 2.3 +/- 2.2 U of homologous blood or blood products were given, and in the aprotinin group, 0.63 +/- 0.96 U were given (P less than 0.05). Twenty-five percent of patients in the control group and 63% in the aprotinin group did not receive banked blood or homologous blood products. The activated clotting time as an indicator of inhibition of the contact phase of coagulation was significantly increased before heparinization in the aprotinin group (141 +/- 13 s vs. 122 +/- 25 s) and remained significantly increased until heparin was neutralized after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

High-dose aprotinin modulates the balance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses during coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE: To rule out the effect of high-dose aprotinin in respect to the balance of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators induced by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: University-affiliated cardiac center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. INTERVENTIONS: In group A patients (n = 10), high-dose aprotinin was administered (2 x 106 KIU pre-CPB, 2 x 10(6) KIU in prime, 500,000 KIU/hr during CPB). In group C patients (n = 10), placebo was used instead. Proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-6, anti-inflammatory IL-1-receptor antagonist, and clinical parameters were measured 8 times perioperatively. The values are presented as mean +/- SEM. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four hours after CPB, IL-6 concentration reached the maximum value, being significantly lower in group A patients as compared with group C patients (615 +/- 62 pg/mL v 1,409 +/- 253 pg/mL; p = 0.019). On the first postoperative day, the concentration of IL-6 in group A patients remained lower (219 +/- 24 pg/mL v 526 +/- 123 pg/mL; p = 0.015). In contrast, IL-1-receptor antagonist concentration was higher in group A patients as compared with group C patients after CPB (13,857 +/- 4,264 pg/mL v 5,675 +/- 1,832 pg/mL; p = 0.03). Total postoperative blood loss was lower in group A patients as compared with group C patients (648 +/- 64 mL v 1,284 +/- 183 mL; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose aprotinin treatment reduced the inflammatory reaction and postoperative blood loss. The anti-inflammatory reaction was significantly enhanced in these patients, which suggests that the physiologic reaction of the organism to reduce the deleterious effects from CPB is more pronounced by using high-dose aprotinin.     

Platelet protection by aprotinin in cardiopulmonary bypass: electron microscopic study.

To evaluate the functional integrity of platelets in patients administered the proteinase inhibitor aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass, 20 patients undergoing a complicated and prolonged open heart operation were studied. They were randomized to receive either a high dose of aprotinin (total dose, 6 to 7 x 10(6) KIU) before and during cardiopulmonary bypass (10 patients) or a placebo (10 patients). Blood samples were collected preoperatively, at the termination of bypass, and 90 minutes thereafter to assess platelet count and aggregation on extracellular matrix, which was studied by scanning electron microscopy. On a scale of 1 to 4, mean preoperative platelet aggregation grades were similar in both groups (3.5 +/- 0.5). Postoperatively, at the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass and 90 minutes thereafter, all 10 patients treated with aprotinin revealed normal, unchanged platelet aggregation (grade, 3.5 +/- 0.5), whereas all placebo-treated patients showed severely disturbed aggregation (grade, 1.4 +/- 0.5) (p less than 0.001). The platelet count was similar in both groups before and after operation (preoperatively, 182 +/- 75 x 10(9)/L and 146 +/- 30 x 10(9)/L, and postoperatively, 87 +/- 13 x 10(9)/L and 80 +/- 27 x 10(9)/L for the aprotinin and placebo groups, respectively). Total 24-hour postoperative bleeding and blood requirement were significantly lower in the aprotinin group (371 +/- 84 mL and 2 +/- 0.7 units, respectively) compared with the placebo group (608 +/- 28 mL and 3.4 +/- 1.3 units, respectively) (p less than 0.01). These results demonstrate that improved postoperative hemostasis is directly related to the complete preservation of platelet function achieved by the protective properties of aprotinin.     

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of an Ultra-Low-Dose Aprotinin Regimen in Reoperative and/or Complex Cardiac Operations

A bstract Background and aim of the study : High-dose aprotinin is an effective but costly method to reduce transfusions after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Very low doses of aprotinin have been shown to be effective in primary cardiac surgery, but not in patients undergoing procedures associated with the greatest usage of allogeneic blood products after CPB. We evaluated the efficacy of ultra-low-dose aprotinin in this patient population. Methods : Aprotinin 1 million KIU or placebo was added to the priming solution of the CPB circuit of 52 patients undergoing a reoperation and/or a complex surgical procedure. Dryness of operative field, hemoglobin concentrations, coagulation parameters, chest drainage, and transfusion requirements were compared. Results : Total chest drainage was not different between groups, but fewer patients in the aprotinin group required additional protamine postoperatively (35% vs 69% for controls, p = 0.03) and fewer received fresh frozen plasma (FFP; 19% vs 46% for controls, p = 0.04). Red cell transfusion was smaller in the aprotinin group compared to placebo (median 4 and 2 units, respectively, p = 0.04). Transfusion of FFP, platelets, cryoprecipitates was not different between groups. Total number of units transfused tended to be reduced in the aprotinin group compared to control (median 2 and 7 units, respectively, p = 0.06). Conclusions : Prophylactic administration of ultra-low-dose aprotinin reduced transfusions in patients undergoing repeat operations or complex procedures. Aprotinin could be used in a more economical manner, even in this patient population at high-risk of receiving allogeneic blood products.     

大剂量抑肽酶对体外循环心内直视手术病人心肌的保护作用

目的：观察体外循环（ＣＰＢ）心内直视手术中使用大剂量抑肽酶对心肌保护的影响。方法：１２０例心脏瓣膜置换手术病人,随机分成两组：Ａ组（抑肽酶组,ｎ＝６０）,Ｂ组（对照组,ｎ＝６０）,ＡＢ两组均在主动脉阻断后行冷晶体停跳,至开放关作末次温血灌注。     

Reduced need for vasopressors in patients receiving aprotinin during orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Graft reperfusion in orthotopic liver transplantation is often associated with significant hemodynamic changes, including decreased systemic vascular resistance and arterial blood pressure. Vasopressive drugs are often required to maintain adequate perfusion pressure during the early postreperfusion period. The exact mechanism of this postreperfusion syndrome is unknown, but release of bradykinin, a potent vasodilatator, via the kallikrein system may play a role. Aprotinin is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of serine proteases such as kallikrein and therefore may ameliorate the postreperfusion syndrome and reduce the need for vasopressors. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared hemodynamic variables (systemic vascular resistance, cardiac index, arterial blood pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure) and the requirement of epinephrine during transplantation in 67 patients who received either high-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU] at induction, continuous infusion of 1 x 10(6) KIU/h, 1 x 10(6) KIU before reperfusion; n = 24), regular-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) KIU at induction, continuous infusion of 0.5 x 10(6) KIU/h; n = 21), or placebo (n = 22). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar for all three groups. Erythrocyte transfusion requirement was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with both aprotinin-treated groups. No major differences in hemodynamic variables were found between the three groups. The total amount of epinephrine (median, range) used during transplantation, however, was significantly lower in patients who received aprotinin (high dose, 20, 0-170 microg; regular dose, 30, 0-140 microg), compared with patients who received placebo (70, 0-2,970 microg; P = 0.0017). This difference was largely attributable to differences in the early postreperfusion period. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of aprotinin ameliorates the postreperfusion syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation, as reflected by a significant reduction in vasopressor requirements.     

小剂量胺碘酮预防冠状动脉旁路移植术后心房纤颤

目的 评价小剂量胺碘酮对冠状动脉旁路移植术后心房纤颤的预防效果、耐受性和安全性。方法 对1998至1999年235例冠状动脉旁路移植术后病人进行回顾性研究分析，其中对照组155例予常规药物，试验组80例合用小剂量胺碘酮。结果 常规药物治疗组21．93％出现心房纤颤，而小剂量胺碘酮预防用药组10％出现心房纤颤(P=0．024)。小剂量胺碘酮致心律失常3例，无甲状腺及肺部并发症发生。结论 预防应用小剂量胺碘酮能明显降低术后心室率，减少心房纤颤发生率，延迟发作，缩短持续时间，促进心房纤颤转复，同时改善心功能。小剂量胺碘酮毒副作用低于大剂量胺碘酮，尤其适用于缺血性心脏病合并心肌梗死及左心功能不全者。     

Ultra-low dose aprotinin decreases transfusion requirements and is cost effective in coronary operations

BACKGROUND: The recommended dose of aprotinin has been shown to reduce blood loss and need for blood transfusions, but the cost precludes its routine use. This study was designed to determine whether a less expensive, ultra-low dose of aprotinin is effective when used in coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery. METHODS: Patients (n = 202) were randomized to receive either placebo or aprotinin, 0.5 million KIU before incision and 0.5 million KIU during initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. Differences in quantity of blood transfused were analyzed. Further groups were analyzed to account for the effect of aspirin. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine risk factors for transfusion. Direct costs of blood products and aprotinin were tabulated for each group. RESULTS: There was an important reduction in the proportion of patients transfused, and number of blood units transfused when aprotinin was given before coronary artery bypass grafting. These differences were even more important in patients on aspirin preoperatively. Independent predictors for increased number of transfusions were aspirin continued before operation, smaller body surface area, and the use of placebo instead of ultra-low dose aprotinin. There was no difference in morbidity between treatment groups. There was a reduction in direct costs associated with the use of aprotinin. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the routine use of aprotinin 1 million KIU in coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery to reduce cost and transfusion requirements.     

Low-dose aprotinin is ineffective to treat excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled clinical experience at our institution suggested that low-dose aprotinin could control excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of low-dose aprotinin in the treatment of hemorrhage after cardiac surgery. METHODS: One hundred seventy-one patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB were included. Forty-four patients (26%) bled significantly in the intensive care unit (>100 mL/h) and received either aprotinin (200,000 KIU bolus + 100,000 KIU/h for 8 hours) or placebo in addition to our standard management of excessive bleeding. RESULTS: Median bleeding before study drug administration was not different between aprotinin (200 mL) and placebo (212.5 mL) groups. Bleeding decreased significantly with time and similarly in both groups. Ninety-five percent of patients required transfusions in both groups. Median blood products transfused were 13 and 8 units per patient in the aprotinin and placebo groups respectively (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Routine administration of low-dose aprotinin as part of the treatment protocol to control hemorrhage after CPB does not reduce bleeding or transfusion requirements and, therefore, cannot be recommended.     

Reduction of postoperative blood loss and donor blood use in heart surgery with aprotinin: experience with various dosages]

The effect of high dose aprotinin was evaluated in a prospective study on 100 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Special attention was made on postoperative blood loss and transfusions of bank blood postoperatively. In the first part of the study, after induction of anesthesia, a loading dose of 2,000,000 kallikrein-inhibiting-unit (KIU) = 280 mg aprotinin was given intravenously over a 30-min period. Immediately afterward, a continuous infusion of 500,000 KIU/h was started and maintained until skin closure. Another 2,000,000 KIU was added to the priming volume of the heart-lung machine. A control group of 50 patients was randomized with similar indication for surgery and past cardiac history. The total loss from the thoracic drains was significantly reduced in the aprotinin group as compared with the loss in the control group (490 +/- 265 ml versus 1045 +/- 380 ml). In a separate group of risk patients (redo-operations, infective endocarditis) the total blood loss was even more significant reduced in the aprotinin group (690 +/- 195 ml versus 1585 +/- 290 ml). Patients of the aprotinin group received markedly less bank blood postoperatively (350 +/- 100 ml versus 900 +/- 240 ml without aprotinin). Part II of the study (36 patients) consisted of lower dosage (2,000,000 KIU intravenously during induction of anesthesia only or 2,000,000 KIU in the priming volume of the heart-lung machine only). Patients who received aprotinin in the heart-lung machine only showed no significant difference regarding blood loss and blood requirement to patients with high dose aprotinin. It appears possible that aprotinin reduces the activation of the coagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass and preserves platelet function without affecting platelet consumption during the extracorporeal circulation. The results of our study demonstrate that high dose aprotinin markedly reduces blood loss as well as homologous blood requirement in the early postoperative course of cardiosurgical patients. Similar effects due to reduced aprotinin dose have been observed in patients receiving aprotinin in the extracorporeal circulation only.     

The effect of aprotinin on risk of acute renal failure requiring dialysis after on-pump cardiac surgery

The use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery to reduce perioperative bleeding and transfusion is controversial. We assessed the effect of aprotinin on the risk of acute renal failure in 423 patients who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2006. Of these 423 patients, 318 (75.2%) received aprotinin (median dose=3.0 million KIU, standard deviation=2.8 million KIU; interquartile range: 2 million KIU to 4 million KIU). Aprotinin was more likely to be used in patients who did not cease aspirin before surgery, in urgent or emergency surgery, who had impaired left ventricular function, a longer period of bypass and aortic cross-clamp time, and with both coronary artery bypass graft and valvular surgery performed. The overall incidence of acute renal failure requiring dialysis was 2.8%. The use of aprotinin was not associated with a reduction in transfusion nor an increased risk of renal failure requiring dialysis, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular accident or mortality in the univarate analyses. In the multivariate analysis, only preoperative serum creatinine concentration (odds ratio [OR] 1.06 per 10 micromol/l increment in creatinine, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.14, P=0.029) and urgency of the surgery (urgent vs. scheduled surgery: OR 12.8, CI: 2.3 to 70.8, P=0.004; emergency vs. scheduled surgery: OR 23.1, CI: 3.0 to 180.2, P=0.003) were significantly associated with an increased risk of acute renal failure requiring dialysis. The use of low-dose aprotinin did not significantly reduce perioperative transfusion requirements and was not a significant risk factor for acute renal failure requiring dialysis in our patients.     

High-dose aprotinin in cardiac surgery: three years' experience in 1,784 patients.

The effect of the proteinase-inhibitor aprotinin on blood loss and homologous blood requirement in cardiac surgery was investigated. In a prospective study, 902 adult patients were treated with high-dose aprotinin (total greater than 5 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units [KIU]; group A), while 882 patients without aprotinin administration served as the controls (group C). Both groups were operated on between January 1987 and October 1989, and included patients with primary coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 525 group C, n = 560 group A), valve replacement (n = 292 group C, n = 264 group A), or combined procedures (n = 65 group C, n = 78 group A), as well as cardiac reoperations (n = 91 group C, n = 110 group A). The average blood loss 36 hours postoperatively in the aprotinin group was 679 +/- 419 mL, compared with 1,038 +/- 671 mL in the control group (P less than 0.05). Total homologous blood requirement was also significantly less in group A (942 +/- 1,630 mL) compared with group C (1,999 +/- 2,283 mL) (P less than 0.05), a reduction of 53%. Serum creatinine concentrations did not show intergroup differences on the first postoperative day (group A, 1.2 +/- 0.7; group C, 1.3 +/- 0.5 mg/dL) or on discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, impairment of renal function as a consequence of aprotinin treatment was not observed. Three patients developed signs of mild circulatory depression after injection of aprotinin, which responded promptly to vasopressor therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

High-dose aprotinin in cardiac surgery: is high-dose high enough? An analysis of 8281 cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin

In this retrospective analysis we tested the hypothesis that aprotinin doses of more than 6 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibiting units (KIU) per patient may be more effective in reducing bleeding compared with the high-dose regimen of 5-6 x 10(6) KIU aprotinin. The aprotinin doses administered for 8281 adult cardiac surgical patients were correlated to body weight and time of operation and calculated in KIU per kg body weight and minute of operation. Linear and logistic regression models were designed to detect potential associations between dose and postoperative bleeding, transfusion, and other covariates. The 6-h chest tube drainage in the lowest quartile dosing group was 447 +/- 319 mL (mean +/- sd) compared with 360 +/- 290 mL in the highest quartile dosing group (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion was reduced from 55% to 47% comparing the lowest with the highest dosing group (P < 0.01). Aprotinin dose was also an independent predictor for rethoracotomy for surgical hemostasis (1.9% in the highest quartile to 2.4% in the lowest dosing quartile; P < 0.01). The risk of renal failure requiring dialysis (2.3% in the highest dosing group vs 3.3% in the lowest dosing group; P < 0.01) or impairment of renal function (creatinine increase of >or=2 mg/dL postoperatively, 6.4% in the highest dosing group vs 10.0% in the lowest dosing group; P < 0.01) was lower with higher doses of aprotinin. Thus, there was no association between aprotinin dose and renal function. Our results support the hypothesis that a more individualized aprotinin regimen with potentially higher doses may optimize the effectiveness of aprotinin therapy in cardiac surgery.     

Does aprotinin influence the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in patients?

OBJECTIVES: Aprotinin has been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties, but its effects on the inflammatory reaction to cardiopulmonary bypass remain controversial. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the influence of aprotinin on various blood markers of inflammation during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Sixty male patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. The patients were randomized into 3 groups: a placebo group, a second group receiving 2,000,000 KIU of aprotinin followed by an infusion of 500,000 KIU/h and 2,000,000 KIU in the pump prime, and a third group receiving half this dosage. Measurements of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, interleukin 10, endotoxin, histamine, complement factors, prekallikrein, and prostaglandin D(2) were obtained at baseline, 30 minutes after study drug loading, 10 minutes after the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass, before the end of bypass, 4 hours after bypass, and on the first and second postoperative days. RESULTS: Aprotinin had no significant effect on any of these parameters. As expected, aprotinin reduced early blood loss in both treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that aprotinin at doses currently used to reduce blood loss has no significant influence on the systemic inflammatory response during moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in human subjects, as assessed by the mediators measured in this study.     

Antifibrinolytic therapy and perioperative blood loss in cancer patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin has been reported to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients having major orthopedic operations. Data on whether epsilon amino-caproic acid (EACA) is effective in this population are sparse. METHODS: Sixty-nine adults with malignancy scheduled for either pelvic, extremity or spine surgery during general anesthesia entered this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and received either intravenous aprotinin (n = 23), bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU), followed by an infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h, or EACA (n = 22), bolus of 150 mg/kg, followed by a 15 mg/kg/h infusion or saline placebo (n = 24) during surgery. Our goal was to determine whether prophylactic EACA or aprotinin therapy would reduce perioperative blood loss (intraoperative + first 48h) >30% when compared to placebo. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 52 +/- 17 yr. The groups did not differ in age, duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss or number of packed erythrocyte units transfused. When compared to the placebo group, the two treated groups had a significantly lower D-Dimer level immediately after surgery, P < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, we were unable to find a clinical benefit to using aprotinin or EACA to reduce perioperative blood loss or transfusion requirements during major orthopedic surgery in cancer patients.