Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate a three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography sequence using standard MR gradients in detecting renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients referred for angiography for suspected renal artery stenosis underwent both conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MR angiography. MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T scanner with standard gradients. A fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo sequence was used with the following parameters: TR/TE, 10.3/1.9; flip angle, 45 degrees; field of view, 36 x 32 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; one excitation; volume thickness, 70 mm; and partitions, 28. Gadolinium was administered IV as a dynamic bolus of 30-40 ml. Conventional and MR angiographic images were interpreted by two radiologists in consensus. RESULTS: DSA revealed 87 renal arteries, of which 79 were in 35 patients with native kidneys and eight arteries were in seven patients with transplanted kidneys. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography showed 85 (98%) of 87 renal arteries. Seventeen patients had 20 significant (>50% stenosis) renal artery stenoses and five patients had five occluded renal arteries revealed by DSA. MR angiography revealed 85 renal arteries (98%), 20 stenoses (100%), and five occlusions (100%). Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography led to one false-positive interpretation for renal artery stenosis and no false-negative interpretations. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR angiography for renal artery stenosis were 100%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MR angiography pulse sequence we used was an effective and reliable technique for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. The sequence can be performed on widely available MR equipment that does not require fast gradient hardware.     

Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR angiography is primarily and increasingly used to assess intracranial arterial stenoocclusion. However, MR angiography can cause overestimation of stenosis. Although CT angiography is accurate, it has limitations. Our purpose was to determine whether the accuracy of combined MR angiography and CT angiography is equal to that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in measuring stenosis and detecting major intracranial arterial occlusion. METHODS: CT angiography and intraarterial DSA were prospectively performed in 18 patients with suspected intracranial stenoocclusive disease, as revealed with MR angiography. Before DSA, two reviewers independently assessed MR intracranial angiograms. Subsequently, they assessed CT angiograms with MR angiograms. Results were compared with DSA results. The degree of stenoocclusion was categorized; stenosis of 50% or more indicated stenoocclusive disease. After the blinded study, two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the angiographic findings. RESULTS: Stenoocclusive disease was identified in 18 of 198 intracranial arteries at DSA. MR angiography had a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 91%, and an accuracy of 91% for the identification of stenosis of 50% or more; the addition of CT angiography yielded values of 100%, 99%, and 99%, respectively. Stenotic grades with combined CT angiography and MR angiography agreed with those of DSA in 98% of cases. In the retrospective study, CT angiography did not always correctly delineate arterial lumina with circumferential calcification and cavernous portions of the internal carotid artery. CONCLUSION: In this investigation, the evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive diseases in major intracranial arteries, the accuracy of combined MR angiography and CT angiography is equal to that of DSA in most cases.     

Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare dynamic three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the detection of ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with carotid stenosis of more than 50% at sonography prospectively underwent both MR angiography and DSA. The overall quality of each DSA and MR angiographic study was analyzed. For each craniocervical vessel (brachiocephalic, common carotid, subclavian, and vertebral arteries) (n = 231), ostial stenosis was graded as follows: normal, mild (<50%), moderate to severe (>50%), or occlusion. MR angiographic and DSA results were compared by means of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Rs). RESULTS: The overall diagnostic quality of MR angiography was excellent or adequate. Three studies were inadequate because of a poor signal-to-noise ratio (13 of 231 arteries) or a coverage error (five of 231 arteries). Findings at MR angiography and DSA agreed on the degree of stenosis (Rs = 0.82, P <.001). No cases of stenosis of more than 50% were missed at MR angiography. However, some discrepancies were noted between vertebral arteries and the other craniocervical vessels. The sensitivity and specificity for stenosis of more than 50% in other craniocervical vessels were 100% and 98%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for stenosis of more than 50% in the vertebral arteries were 100% and 85%, respectively. Findings at MR angiography tended to result in overestimation of the degree of ostial stenosis, especially in vertebral arteries (10 [15%] of 66 arteries). CONCLUSION: MR angiography is useful to rule out ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels. MR angiography is an adequate diagnostic tool for ostial stenosis, except in the vertebral artery.     

Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the reference standard for assessing carotid arteries, it is uncomfortable for patients and has a small risk of disabling stroke and death. These problems have fueled the use of spiral CT angiography and MR angiography. We prospectively compared elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography with conventional DSA for detecting carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Eighty carotid arteries (in 40 symptomatic patients) were assessed. Elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiographic data were reconstructed with maximum intensity projection and multiplanar reconstruction techniques. All patients had been referred for DSA evaluation on the basis of findings at Doppler sonography, which served as a screening method (degree of stenosis > or = 70% or inconclusive results). Degree of carotid stenosis estimated by using the three modalities was compared. RESULTS: Significant correlation with DSA was found for stenosis degree for both elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiography; however, the correlation coefficient was higher for MR than for CT angiography (r = 0.98 vs r = 0.86). Underestimation of stenoses of 70-99% occurred in one case with elliptic centric MR angiography (a 70% stenosis was underestimated as 65%) and in nine cases with spiral CT angiography, in comparison to DSA findings. Overestimation occurred in two cases with MR angiography (stenoses of 65-67% were overestimated as 70-75%). With CT, overestimation occurred in seven cases; a stenosis of 60% in one case was overestimated as 70%. Both techniques confirmed the three cases of carotid occlusion. With elliptic centric MR angiography, carotid stenoses of 70% or greater were detected with high sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 95.2%; likelihood ratio (LR) for a positive test result, 20.4; and ratio of LR(+) to LR(-), -0.3. With spiral CT angiography, sensitivity, specificity, LR(+), and LR(+):LR(-) were 74.3%, 97.6%, 31.2, and 0.3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more accurate than spiral CT angiography to adequately evaluate carotid stenosis. Furthermore, elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography appears to be adequate to replace conventional DSA in most patients examined.     

Distal lower extremity imaging: prospective comparison of 2-dimensional time of flight, 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and 3-dimensional bolus chase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 2-dimensional time of flight, the 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and the 3-dimensional 3-station bolus chase contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing distal station atherosclerosis. METHODS: Two-dimensional time of flight, 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography, and 3-dimensional bolus chase contrast-enhanced MR angiography were performed from the knees to the metatarsal heads of 40 patients. Blinded to the patients' identity, 2 readers independently reviewed the 3 sequences in random order; differences were resolved by consensus. Anterior tibial, peroneal, and posterior tibial arterial lengths to the talar dome were scored as follows: 1, greater than 50% of the length of a normal artery; 2, less than 50%; and 3, total occlusion. Stenoses were scored as follows: 1, less than 50%; and 2, greater than 50%. The pedal vessels (dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial, and plantar pedal arch arteries) were scored as follows: 1, less than 50% stenosis; and 2, greater than 50% stenosis. The reference standard was a combined interpretation of all 3 sequences by both readers in consensus. RESULTS: For the 240 calf segments scored for length, concordance with reference assessment was poorer for the time of flight than for either the bolus chase or time-resolved angiography (P = 0.0021 and P = 0.0082, respectively), and the latter two were statistically indistinguishable. For stenosis grading of the 461 calf and pedal segments, the time-resolved and bolus chase methods were superior to the time of flight (P = <0.0001 and P = 0.0041, respectively), and the contrast-enhanced methods were statistically indistinguishable. CONCLUSIONS: Both contrast-enhanced time-resolved and bolus chase MR angiography are superior to the time of flight in diagnosing distal station peripheral vascular disease.     

Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: The danger of limb loss as a consequence of acute occlusion of infrapopliteal bypasses underscores the requirement for careful patient follow-up. The objective of this study was to determine the agreement and accuracy of contrast material-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and duplex ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of failing bypass grafts. In cases of discrepancy, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) served as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR angiography was performed in 24 consecutive patients with 26 femorotibial or femoropedal bypass grafts. Each revascularized limb was divided into five segments--(i) native arteries proximal to the graft; (ii) proximal anastomosis; (iii) graft course; (iv) distal anastomosis; and (v) native arteries distal to the graft-resulting in 130 vascular segments. Three readers evaluated all MR angiograms for image quality and the presence of failing grafts. The degree of stenosis was compared to the findings of duplex US, and in case of discrepancy, to DSA findings. Two separate analyses were performed with use of DSA only and a combined diagnostic endpoint as the reference standard. RESULTS: Image quality was rated excellent or intermediate in 119 of 130 vascular segments (92%). Venous overlay was encountered in 26 of 130 segments (20%). In only two segments was evaluation of the outflow region not feasible. One hundred seventeen of 130 vascular segments were available for quantitative analysis. In 109 of 117 segments (93%), MR angiography and duplex US showed concordant findings. In the eight discordant segments in seven patients, duplex US overlooked four high-grade stenoses that were correctly identified by MR angiography and confirmed by DSA. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in these cases. In no case did MR angiography miss an area of stenosis of sufficient severity to require treatment. Total accuracy for duplex US ranged from 0.90 to 0.97 depending on the reference standard used, whereas MR angiography was completely accurate (1.00) regardless of the standard definition. CONCLUSION: Our data strongly suggest that the accuracy of MR angiography for identifying failing grafts in the infrapopliteal circulation is equal to that of duplex US and superior to that of duplex US in cases of complex revascularization. MR angiography should be included in routine follow-up of patients undergoing infrapopliteal bypass surgery.     

Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since 1996, several preliminary studies have shown the usefulness of contrast material-enhanced MR angiography for imaging supraaortic vessels. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: A blinded comparison of first-pass contrast-enhanced MR angiography with conventional DSA was performed in 120 patients (240 arteries). MR angiography was performed with a 1.5-T magnet with gradient overdrive equipment, by using a coronal radiofrequency-spoiled 3D fast low-angle-shot sequence after the intravenous injection of gadodiamide. The guidelines of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial for measuring stenosis of the internal carotid artery were applied on maximum intensity projection (MIP) images and conventional catheter angiograms. RESULTS: Grading of stenoses on MR angiograms agreed with grading of stenoses on DSA images in 89% of arteries. In the severe stenosis group (70-99%), agreement was 93%. All internal carotid occlusions (n = 28) and seven of nine pseudo-occlusions were accurately detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. The correlation between MR angiography and DSA for determination of minimal, moderate, and severe stenoses and occlusion was statistically significant (r = 0.91, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation with a large number of patients confirms that contrast-enhanced MR angiography could become a diagnostic alternative to DSA in the treatment of patients with carotid artery disease.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries including pedal vessels at 1.0 T: feasibility study with dedicated peripheral angiography coil

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine feasibility of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the peripheral arteries from distal aorta to pedal arteries with a 1.0-T system and a dedicated phased-array coil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with peripheral arteriosclerotic occlusive disease underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography with an automatic moving-table technique. In addition, lower-leg and pedal arteries were examined without table movement (hybrid technique). Two radiologists independently reviewed MR angiograms to assess image quality and grade stenosis in 13 segments per leg. Each was blinded to patients' clinical data. Twenty-five of the patients also underwent conventional angiography. Stenosis grade at conventional angiography was assessed by two radiologists in consensus. Interobserver variability for stenosis grade at MR angiography was calculated with Cohen kappa test. Specificity and sensitivity of MR angiography in detection of stenosis of more than 50% and occlusion were calculated for both observers. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. RESULTS: In 14 of the 27 patients, hybrid technique was superior to moving-table technique because there was less venous overlap (11 patients), fewer motion artifacts (one patient), or both (two patients). In nine patients, there was no difference between techniques; in four patients, moving-table technique was superior. Stenosis grade was analyzed in 698 segments with MR angiography and in 638 segments with both conventional and MR angiography. Kappa analysis of interobserver agreement with MR angiography yielded a score of 0.84. For the 638 segments evaluated with both conventional and MR angiography, observers 1 and 2 assigned same grade of stenosis with both modalities in 558 and 555 segments, respectively. Sensitivity for stenoses greater than 50% and occlusion was 94.4% and 91.1% for observers 1 and 2, respectively, and specificity was 90.6% and 91.3%. More distal runoff vessels were shown with MR angiography in seven cases and with conventional angiography in two cases. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels with a 1.0-T system and dedicated peripheral angiography coil is feasible, and in some cases, it provides additional information compared with conventional angiography.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) is a proven diagnostic tool in evaluation of the carotid arteries; however, few studies have addressed its accuracy in the vertebrobasilar system. The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CE MRA compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for detection of vertebrobasilar disease. METHODS: Forty patients with suspected atherosclerotic disease of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations underwent CE MRA on a 1.5 T MR imaging scanner by use of a coronal 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence after intravenous injection of gadolinium diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid. All patients had correlative DSA within a 1-month period. CE MRA images were randomized and then independently assessed by 2 observers who were blinded to the DSA results. DSA examinations were analyzed in a similar manner. Each observer was asked to report the presence or absence of clinically significant stenosis (>50%), occlusion, fistula, aneurysm, and dissection. The MRA findings were then correlated with DSA. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MRA for detection of disease in the entire carotid and vertebrobasilar systems were 90% and 97%, respectively; for the carotid system alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively; and for the vertebrobasilar system they were 88% and 98% respectively. The overall interobserver reliability was 98% (kappa = 0.92). CONCLUSION: CE MRA is accurate at detecting disease not only in the carotid vessels, but also in the vertebrobasilar circulation, and has the potential to provide a comprehensive and noninvasive evaluation of the head and neck arteries in a single study.     

Peripheral vascular disease: combined 3D bolus chase and dynamic 2D MR angiography compared with x-ray angiography for treatment planning

PURPOSE: To compare combined three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with x-ray angiography for planning treatment of peripheral vascular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiologists retrospectively reviewed the pretreatment x-ray angiographic and MR angiographic studies obtained in 30 consecutive patients: 15 patients (15 limbs) evaluated for limb salvage and 15 patients (20 limbs) evaluated because of claudication. MR angiography included acquisition of 2D contrast-enhanced MR digital subtraction angiograms of the area from the adductor canal to the feet and 3D spoiled gradient-recalled-echo bolus chase MR angiograms obtained in three stations from the aorta to the middle portion of the calf. Each reader reviewed the x-ray and MR angiograms to determine the inflow and outflow segments for a hypothetical bypass graft placement. RESULTS: The three readers selected identical segments for inflow at MR angiography and x-ray angiography in 32, 32, and 35 of the 35 limbs evaluated (mean percentages of agreement [95% CI ]: 91% [77%, 98%], 91% [77%, 98%], and 95% [90%, 100%], respectively). The readers selected identical segments for outflow in 32, 32, and 34 of the 35 limbs evaluated (mean percentages of agreement [95% CI]: 91% [77%, 98%], 91% [77%, 98%], and 97% [85%, 100%], respectively). CONCLUSION: Preliminary data support the combining of 2D MR digital subtraction angiography with 3D bolus chase MR angiography to extend the utility of 3D MR angiography in treatment planning to include patients being evaluated for limb salvage, as well as those being evaluated for claudication.     

三维对比剂增强MR血管成像对颈部动脉病变的诊断价值

目的　分析三维对比剂增强MR血管成像 (3DCE MRA)显示的颈部动脉常见病变 ;与DSA比较 ,明确 3DCE MRA诊断颈部动脉病变的价值。方法　对 741例超声多普勒怀疑颈部动脉疾病的患者进行 3DCE MRA成像 ,并根据其病变表现总结分类。 2 0 6例病人同时行DSA检查 ,将颈部动脉分为颈总、颈内、颈外、锁骨下及椎动脉 5个部位 ,由 2位放射学专家独立评估DSA及 3DCE MRA血管资料。结果　 3 6 7%病例 (2 72 / 741)显示无异常。 63 2 9% (469/ 741)显示颈部动脉有病变 ,共计 82 7段 ,其中动脉粥样斑块占 3 4 2 2 % (2 83段 ) ,动脉狭窄占 3 4 46% (2 85段 ) ,动脉闭塞占 3 3 8% (2 8段 ) ,动脉发育纤细占 14 87% (12 3段 ) ;动脉开口变异占 3 87% (3 2段 ) ,动脉扭曲占 3 63 % (3 0段 ) ,动脉瘤占 0 72 % (6段 ) ,动脉夹层占 1 2 1% (10段 ) ,肿瘤包绕或推压动脉占 1 45% (12段 ) ,术后复查占2 18% (18段 )。对 2 0 6例的 412段血管与DSA比较 ,3DCE MRA在颈总动脉、颈内动脉及椎动脉的阳性检出率差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 1) ,主要是对动脉粥样斑块 (2 56段与 2 83段 )和动脉狭窄 (2 58段与 2 85段 )存在一定的高估。但对 412段血管整个样本 ,两种方法在同一部位诊断各种血管病变差异无显著性意义 (P >0 0     

Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with that of conventional angiography for imaging the lower extremity vasculature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients who were evaluated for possible surgical intervention underwent conventional angiography (ie, digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ie, time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics [TRICKS]). Two independent, blinded readers evaluated vessel stenosis and occlusion at DSA and MR angiographic image readings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. The Cohen kappa test was performed to examine interreader variability. RESULTS: At pooled readings, contrast-enhanced MR angiography had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 98% for detection of occlusion. For detection of significant stenosis (at least one > or = 50% stenosis), sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 91%, respectively. Interreader agreement was high for detection of both occlusion (kappa = 0.76) and significant stenosis (kappa = 0.68). Sensitivity increased as MR angiographic technical parameters were optimized. When improvements resulting from coil type and injection protocol were considered, the sensitivity and specificity of TRICKS MR angiography were 89% and 97%, respectively, for occlusion detection and 87% and 90%, respectively, for significant stenosis detection. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced TRICKS MR angiography is a feasible and minimally invasive means of acquiring angiograms of the peripheral vasculature with high sensitivity and specificity.     

Critical limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA

PURPOSE: To compare a hybrid magnetic resonance (MR) angiography protocol with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with critical limb ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board, and written consent was obtained from all patients. Pretreatment DSA and hybrid MR angiography were performed in 19 consecutive patients (15 men, four women; mean age, 69.8 years; range, 44-86 years). Hybrid MR angiography included submillimeter dual-phase three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in lower calf and foot, and four-station bolus-chase MR angiography in pelvis, thigh, and upper calf. Three readers identified the target lesion and inflow and outflow segments and determined treatment (bypass graft placement, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, conservative management, amputation). Results of interobserver and intermethod comparisons were expressed as percentage of agreement and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: On hybrid MR angiograms, no substantial venous overlay was present and image quality was excellent or adequate in 18 (95%) of 19 limbs. Readers 1, 2, and 3 selected the identical target lesion on the DSA image and the MR angiogram in 18, 17, and 18 of 18 comparable limbs, respectively. Mean percentage of agreement for readers 1 and 3 was 100% (95% CI: 81%, 100%) and for reader 2 was 94% (95% CI: 73%, 100%). Agreement of all three readers was superior with use of MR angiography for determination of inflow segments (13 [72%] of 18 limbs) and outflow segments (17 [94%] of 18 limbs), compared with agreement with use of DSA (13 [68%] of 19 inflow segments, 10 [53%] of 19 outflow segments). Agreement in therapy decisions was higher with DSA (15 [79%] of 19) than with MR angiography (11 [61%] of 18). CONCLUSION: Preliminary data strongly support the combination of submillimeter dual-phase MR angiography in lower calf and foot with four-station bolus-chase MR angiography to extend the utility of MR angiography to patients with critical limb ischemia.     

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in a time-resolved technique compared with digital subtraction angiography (x-ray DSA) in patients with suspected stenoses of the internal carotid artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent selective x-ray DSA involving a total of 84 carotid arteries. CE-MRA was performed in a time-resolved technique with a fast gradient-echo sequence on a 1.5 T MR scanner: TR 3.8 milliseconds, TE 1.49 milliseconds. Four consecutive measurements, each a duration of 10 seconds, were performed with omission of measuring bolus transit time. Four independent radiologists scored the degree of stenosis. The interobserver variability was calculated for CE-MRA and x-ray DSA. RESULTS: In the 43 cases, at least one MRA measurement showed arterial contrast without venous degradation. Compared with x-ray DSA the mean sensitivity and specificity for grading stenosis > or = 70% were 98% and 86%, respectively. The interobserver agreement was substantial with no significant difference between CE-MRA (kappa value 0.794) and x-ray DSA (kappa value 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: The short acquisition time of a fast CE-MRA sequence allows a selective visualization of the internal carotid arteries without degradation from venous enhancement. It is a reliable method with a good interobserver agreement.     

64层螺旋CT血管成像对下肢动脉系统疾病的应用价值

目的:探讨64层螺旋CT血管成像术在下肢动脉疾病中的应用价值及技术优势。方法:对21例疑有下肢动脉疾病患者行64层螺旋CT增强扫描,扫描范围从肾动脉水平达足底。薄层重建横断面图像传入Wizard工作站,进行血管三维重建。其中21例结合常规血管造影评价64层螺旋CT血管成像术(CTA)的准确性。结果:在441个动脉节段中,435个节段在CTA与DSA均可以显示,在DSA图像上,狭窄闭塞的节段共130个(轻度狭窄16段,中度狭窄12段,重度狭窄22段,闭塞80段),最大密度投影(MIP)显示中度以上狭窄的敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为:99.1%、99.7%、99.5%。结论:64层CT血管成像是一种高度准确、非侵袭性的成像技术,在评估下肢动脉疾病方面与常规血管造影结果无明显差别,是下肢动脉疾病较好的影像学检查手段。     

High-spatial-resolution 3D balanced turbo field-echo technique for MR angiography of the renal arteries: initial experience

PURPOSE: To compare a multislab balanced turbo field-echo magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic technique, without the use of a contrast agent, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for imaging of the renal arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five randomly selected patients (eight women and 17 men; age range, 27-88 years; mean age, 72 years) suspected of having renal artery stenosis underwent both DSA and balanced turbo field-echo MR angiography. A consensus result was obtained among three radiologists in evaluation of main renal arteries on balanced turbo field-echo images and DSA images. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the balanced turbo field-echo technique were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for depiction of hemodynamically significant stenosis. Cohen kappa analysis was used to assess agreement between the two imaging methods in grading of stenoses and depiction of significant stenosis. Accessory renal arteries also were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty main renal arteries and 11 accessory arteries were fully depicted with DSA. DSA depicted 11 stenotic lesions in the main renal arteries. In comparison, balanced turbo field-echo MR angiography enabled visualization of 46 of 50 main renal arteries to their first branching points and depicted 10 of 11 accessory arteries. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of this technique for depiction of significant stenosis were 100% (four of four), 98% (41 of 42), 100% (41 of 41), and 80% (four of five), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.988. kappa was 0.782 for grading of stenoses and 0.877 for depiction of significant stenosis. CONCLUSION: Multislab balanced turbo field-echo imaging has potential as an MR angiography technique for depiction of normal and diseased renal arteries.     

下肢动脉闭塞性病变的64层CT血管造影与DSA的对照研究

目的对照DSA,研究64层螺旋CT血管造影(CTA)对下肢动脉闭塞性病变诊断的临床应用价值。方法对31例下肢动脉闭塞性病变患者行64层螺旋CTA检查,检查后2周内行DSA。CT数据重建采用最大密度投影、容积重建及多平面重建技术。DSA采用步进跟踪造影技术或分段DSA进行下肢血管检查,将CTA与DSA结果比较。结果在216个动脉节段中,2种检查方法狭窄程度显示一致的有157个,被CTA高估13个,低估6个。CTA对下肢动脉狭窄程度≥50%诊断的灵敏度为98.21%,特异度96.15%,准确率97.22%,阳性预测值96.49%,阴性预测值98.04%。结论64层CT血管造影是下肢动脉闭塞性病变评估的可靠方法,可为制订介入治疗方案提供准确的参考依据。     

Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for identifying and evaluating arteries of the distal calf and foot in diabetic patients with severe arterial occlusive disease who will undergo distal bypass surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four feet of 24 consecutive patients with diabetes and limb-threatening lower extremity ischemia were prospectively imaged using an ultrafast three-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence on a 1.5-T MR scanner. All patients also underwent DSA of the diseased extremity within 5 days. Images were interpreted in a randomized manner by two observers in conference. Each lower extremity was divided into seven potential arterial segments. Image analysis included the detection of patent, stenosed, or occluded vessel segments. A vascular surgeon formulated treatment plans on the basis of findings from DSA and then formulated treatment plans on the basis of findings from both DSA and MR angiography. RESULTS: MR angiography was significantly better than DSA in revealing peripheral runoff vessels (p < 0.001). In nine (38%) of the 24 patients, MR angiography showed patent pedal vessels suitable for distal bypass grafting that were not revealed by DSA. Because of the results of MR angiography, treatment plans changed in seven of the nine patients in whom patent vessels were subsequently used as target vessels for distal pedal bypass grafts. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography is superior to DSA in revealing patent vessel segments of the foot in diabetic patients with severe arterial occlusive disease. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography should be part of the diagnostic algorithm for patients in whom pedal bypass grafting is a therapeutic option.     

Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading

PURPOSE: To compare three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and rotational angiography for depiction of stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had Ethics Committee approval, and each patient gave written informed consent. Forty-nine patients (18 women, mean age, 67.2 years +/- 9.1 [+/- standard deviation], and 31 men, mean age, 63.1 years +/- 8.0) with symptomatic stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) diagnosed at duplex ultrasonography underwent transverse 3D TOF MR angiography with sliding interleaved kY acquisition and coronal contrast-enhanced MR angiography, followed by DSA and rotational angiography within 48 hours. MR angiography was performed at 1.5-T with a cervical coil. Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms were obtained after a bolus injection of 20 mL of gadobenate dimeglumine. Maximum ICA stenosis on maximum intensity projection and source images was quantified according to NASCET criteria. Correlations for 3D TOF MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were determined by means of cross tabulation, and accuracy for detection and grading of stenoses were calculated. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and McNemar test, all at significance of P < .05. RESULTS: Ninety-eight ICAs were evaluated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography, and 97 were evaluated at 3D TOF MR angiography. Correlations for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 3D TOF MR angiography, and DSA relative to rotational angiography were r2 = 0.9332, r2 = 0.9048, and r2 = 0.9255, respectively. Lower correlation (r2 = 0.8593) was noted for contrast-enhanced MR angiography and DSA. Respective sensitivity and specificity for detection of hemodynamically relevant stenosis relative to rotational angiography were 100% and 90% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 95.5% and 87.2% for 3D TOF MR angiography, and 88.6% and 100% for DSA. Four of 31 severe stenoses were underestimated at DSA, and three were underestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Three severe stenoses were underestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and one was misclassified as occluded. Of 13 moderate (50%-69%) stenoses, one was overestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, two were underestimated and three overestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and two were underestimated at DSA. CONCLUSION: DSA results in an underestimation of ICA stenosis compared with rotational angiography. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography correlates best with rotational angiography.     

Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine, for both digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, the accuracy of subjective visual impression (SVI) in the evaluation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, with objective caliper measurements serving as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethics committee approval and written informed patient consent were obtained. A total of 142 symptomatic patients (41 women, 101 men; mean age, 70 years; age range, 44-89 years) suspected of having ICA stenosis on the basis of Doppler ultrasonographic findings underwent both DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. With each modality, three independent neuroradiologists who were blinded to other test results first visually estimated and subsequently objectively measured stenoses. Diagnostic accuracy and percentage misclassification for correct categorization of 70%-99% stenosis were calculated for SVI, with objective measurements serving as the reference standard. Interobserver variability was determined with kappa statistics. RESULTS: After exclusion of arteries that were unsuitable for measurement, 180 vessels remained for analysis with DSA and 159 vessels remained for analysis with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. With respect to 70%-99% stenosis, SVI was associated with average misclassification of 8.9% for DSA (8.9%, 7.8%, and 10.0% for readers A, B, and C, respectively) and of 11.7% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography (11.3%, 8.8%, and 15.1% for readers A, B, and C, respectively). Negative predictive values were excellent (92.3%-100%). Interobserver variability was higher for SVI (DSA, kappa = 0.62-0.71; contrast-enhanced MR angiography, kappa = 0.57-0.69) than for objective measurements (DSA, kappa = 0.75-0.80; contrast-enhanced MR angiography, kappa = 0.66-0.72). CONCLUSION: SVI alone is not recommended for evaluation of ICA stenosis with both DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. SVI may be acceptable as an initial screening tool to exclude the presence of 70%-99% stenosis, but caliper measurements are warranted to confirm the presence of such stenosis.