Endovascular repair of late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture owing to mixed-type endoleak following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

We report the successful endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a multimorbid patient 8 months after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A 74-year-old man with a history of EVAR 8 months earlier presented with hypotension, severe back pain, and tenderness on abdominal palpation. A contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scan showed a large retroperitoneal hematoma and confirmed the diagnosis of secondary abdominal aortic rupture. Because the patient had severe comorbidities, the endovascular method was chosen for further management. Two stent grafts were placed appropriately to eliminate a type 1a and a type 3 endoleak owing to modular separation of the left iliac graft limb from the main body stent graft. An additional self-expanding stent was deployed in the solitary right renal artery to open its origin, which was partially overlapped by the proximal cuff. The patient was discharged on the tenth postoperative day and is alive and well 1 year postoperatively. This case indicates that endovascular repair is feasible not only in cases of primarily ruptured AAAs but also in secondarily ruptured AAAs after failure of EVAR.     

腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗现状

1991年,Parodi等发明人工血管内支架（stent graft,SG）并用于临床成功治愈腹主动脉瘤（abdominal aortic aneurvsm,AAA）,此后腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗（endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair,EVAR）取得迅速发展。由于EVAR避免了传统开腹手术创伤大和出血多的缺点,使高龄或伴有心、肺、肝、肾功能不全的患者获得积极治疗的机会。一般来讲,腔内治疗主要是指肾下型腹主动脉瘤。     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Around two-thirds of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are incidentaldiscoveries during the investigation of backache, hip pain orurinary tract complaints. They are much more common in men thanwomen (5:1) and account for 2% of all deaths in men aged >60yr. Open surgical repair of the aneurysm is considered as thestandard, traditional method of treatment. Surgery is recommendedwhen the AAA exceeds 55 mm in anteroposterior diameter as measuredby ultrasound scan. The risk of spontaneous rupture dependson aneurysm size, ranging from <1% per annum for AAA <55mm diameter to >17% per annum for aneurysms >60 mm diameter.Ninety per cent of AAAs are located distal to the renal arteries. Endovascular repair of an aortic aneurysm using an in-situ prostheticgraft was suggested as a technique in 1969 by Dotter, but wasonly first performed successfully by Parodi and colleagues in1990. Over the last 10 yr, the availability of endovascularstent grafts has provided an alternative treatment for patientswith AAA, especially the elderly with significant co-existingmedical conditions. Endovascular repair is much less invasive.However, it is challenging technically and requires a multidisciplinaryapproach. During endovascular surgery, an aortic stent graft is passedvia the femoral arteries through the aortic lumen to fit tightlyabove and below the AAA. The aim is to exclude the aneurysmsac from the systemic circulation, thereby decreasing or eliminatingthe risk of future rupture. The procedure is performed throughincisions in one or both groins; no laparotomy is required.However, certain anatomical considerations apply.     

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a renal transplant patient

A 65-year-old man presented with an asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm of 6 cm in transverse diameter. Five years before he received a cadaveric renal transplant. The patient also had the following risk factors and associated diseases: arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, previous myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty and stent, ileal resection secondary to Chron disease, hepatopathy, hyperlipidemia and hepato-renal cystic disease. The ASA classification was III, IV. Considering previous abdominal operations and risk factors, we decided to repair the aneurysm with a minimal aggression. The aneurysm was successfully approached by an endovascular route implanting a 22x10 bifurcated aorto-iliac endovascular prosthesis. The patient died 13 months later after being diagnosed of enterocolitis by cytomegalovirus complicated with sepsis and lung infection. We consider this less invasive modality of treatment a valid and useful alternative in this high-risk group of patients.     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is a connective tissue disorder caused by abnormal collagen synthesis. Vascular complications, including aneurysm formation and spontaneous arterial perforations, are difficult to manage surgically and result in significant operative mortality due to blood vessel fragility. We describe the first reported successful endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. We discuss the advantages endovascular surgery offers over open surgery in these patients. We believe that endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms preferentially over open repair merits consideration in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.     

ǻ���޸������Ƹ���������

应用跨肾动脉支架人工血管腔内修复术治疗腹主动脉瘤,并探讨其手术适应证,操作要点及并发症的预防。方法对２例病人采用全麻,在动态数字减影血管造影监测下用跨肾动脉支架分叉型人工血管对腹主动脉瘤进行了腔内修复术,结果手术中ＤＳＡ提示动脉瘤消失,无内漏发生。术后１周及分别随访３和９个月,螺旋ＣＴ检查提示腔内人工血管无移位扭曲,血流通畅无内漏发生,结论腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术手术创伤小,病人恢复快,跨肾动支架人工     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in women

The objective of this review is to establish the role of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in women. A step by step approach is taken looking at sex and gender differences in epidemiology, pathogenesis and natural history. We then proceed to discuss the results from the three randomized controlled trials comparing EVAR to open repair. Finally, sex-specific secondary prevention, risk factor management and medication, is discussed. Women seem to have higher mortality and more complications after EVAR. Risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension are associated with worse outcome in women compared to men. The role of EVAR in women is poorly investigated and its definite role remains to be determined. Aggressive treatment of risk factors and the optimisation of medication in women are indicated and deserve more attention in clinical practice and future research.     

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the multifocal atherosclerotic patient

One of the major problems of treating aortic aneurysms has been the multifocal nature of atherosclerotic disease. Co-existing cardiovascular disease in the majority of patients together with chronic obstructive airways disease, renal impairment and hostile abdomen in some, has resulted in 1/3 of patients presenting with aortic aneurysms being regarded as high risk and unfit for open repair. Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm therefore has much to recommend it since it avoids the need for laparatomy, cross clamping of the aorta and the obligatory blood loss associated with opening of the sac. Between May 1992 and March 2003 we have used the endovascular method to repair abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 583 patients. Successful repair was achieved in 563 patients (96%). The remaining 20 patients required primary conversion to open repair at the original operation. The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 13 of 583 (2.2%). In this paper we summarise a number of studies that we have undertaken, comparing endovascular with alternative treatment methods and comparing various types of endovascular prostheses. In addition we report the long-term outcome of endovascular AAA repair as it relates to morphological changes in the proximal neck out to 9 years from operation. We conclude that despite the continuing small incidence of device failure, endovascular is the preferred method of AAA repair in the multifocal atherosclerotic patient. This view is based on the low perioperative mortality, superior survival compared with open repair and our experience of long-term stability in the proximal neck in the majority of patients.     

腔内修复术在复杂型肾下腹主动脉瘤中的应用

目的:探讨对于复杂型肾下腹主动脉瘤(AAA)行腔内修复(EVAR)治疗的操作要点和治疗效果。方法:回顾行EVAR治疗的15例复杂型肾下AAA患者的临床资料,分析术中操作要点和临床结局。结果:手术技术成功率为100%,无中转开腹病例,1例(6.67%)术后5 d死于急性心衰。瘤颈成角过大2例患者均使用肱-股双导丝技术完成手术;髂动脉狭窄患者7例,4例利用肱-股双导丝技术及球囊扩张后置入支架,其余经球囊扩张完成操作;1例左髂动脉闭塞的患者采用对侧髂动脉进入导丝通过闭塞段完成手术;8例重度扭曲患者通过超硬导丝将扭曲段纠正后释放支架。术中无瘤体破裂、血管穿孔及医源性血管夹层等严重并发症出现。随访期间,1例患者术后2年出现腰椎结核,死于多脏器功能衰竭;内漏3例,二次手术干预1例。结论:随着经验的积累,技术的进步及支架的不断完善,EVAR治疗复杂型肾下AAA是可行、有效的。     

Endovascular versus "fast-track'' abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Recent studies have shown that endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has decreased costs, as well as decreased intensive care unit and total hospital length of stays when compared to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using a retroperitoneal exposure. The authors hypothesized that the fast-track AAA repair, which combines a retroperitoneal exposure with a patient care pathway that includes a gastric promotility agent and patient-controlled analgesia, would have no differences when compared to EVAR. Records of 58 patients who underwent AAA repair between April 14, 2000, and July 12, 2002, were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic information, length of stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, mortality, and costs were evaluated. Fifty-eight AAA repairs were performed with the EVAR (n=28) and fast-track (n=30) techniques. The EVAR group was slightly older (72 vs 68 years, p=0.04), had slightly smaller average aneurysm size (5.5 +/-0.13 vs 6.1 +/-0.17 cm, p=0.008), and had more patients designated American Society of Anesthesia class 4 (p<0.0001). Both groups were predominantly male. Otherwise there were no statistically significant differences in risk factors. Patients who underwent fast-track repair tended to have a longer operation (216 +/-7.4 vs 158 +/-6.8 minutes, p<0.0001), with a greater volume of blood (1.8 +/-0.29 vs 0.32 +/-0.24 units, p=0.0005), colloid (565 +/-89 vs 32 +/-22 cc, p<0.0001), and crystalloid transfusions (4,625 +/-252 vs 2,627 +/-170 cc, p<0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of intraoperative or postoperative complications between the 2 groups. EVAR patients resumed a regular diet earlier (0.21 +/-0.08 vs 1.8 +/-0.11 days, p<0.0001). Intensive care unit stay was shorter for EVAR (0.50 +/-0.10 vs 0.87 +/-0.10 days, p=0.01), but floor (2.1 +/-0.23 vs 2.6 +/-0.21 days, p=0.17), and total hospital lengths of stay (2.8 +/-0.32 vs 3.4 +/-0.18 days, p=0.07) were similar between the 2 groups. Total hospital cost was lower in the fast-track (10,205 dollars +/-736 dollars vs 20,640 dollars +/- 1,206 dollars, p<0.0001) leading to greater overall hospital earnings (6,141 dollars +/- 1,280 dollars vs 107 dollars +/- 1,940 dollars, p=0.01). Fast-track AAA repair is a viable alternative for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Compared to endovascular repair, the fast-track method had increased transfusions of blood and intravenous fluids and increased operating room times, but equivalent lengths of floor and total hospital stay and increased total hospital earnings.     

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in renal transplantation

Successful endovascular correction of a 12-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is described in a 76-year-old man with a functional pelvic renal transplant and 18-month follow-up. Endovascular treatment is a safe alternative to surgery for AAA correction in the elderly post-transplantation patient since it does not require flow interruption during the procedure.     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a community hospital's experience

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the first-line approach for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Outcomes outside of tertiary care settings remain unknown. The purpose of this study is to report the midterm outcomes of EVAR in a community hospital. A retrospective review of 75 elective, consecutive EVARs performed at a single nonacademic community hospital was performed. There were no conversions to open repair during or after endovascular repair. The mean follow-up was 18 months. There were no postoperative ruptures or aneurysm-related deaths. At 24 months, freedom from aneurysm-related death was 100%, freedom from secondary interventions was 91%, and freedom from endoleak was 69%. EVAR in the community setting is a safe and durable procedure, even in a medically high-risk population. Comparable outcomes can be achieved to tertiary care centers, in carefully selected patients with favorable anatomy.     

Endovascular stent-graft repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with cardiac and renal dysfunction

This case report details our experience with endovascular stent-graft repair for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a patient who was previously treated by left ventricular remodeling for dilated cardiomyopathy. Renal dysfunction with an elevated creatinine level (1.59 mg/dl) was managed by reducing the dose of contrast medium utilizing intravascular ultrasonography. Using a Zenith AAA endovascular device, the aneurysmal sac was successfully excluded and was thrombosed. Endovascular stenting is a good treatment option for abdominal aneurysm repair in patients with poor heart function and renal impairment.     

Endovascular stent-graft repair of failed endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Despite high initial technical success, the long-term durability of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) continues to be a concern. Following EVAR, patients can experience endoleaks, device migration, device fractures, or aneurysm growth that may require intervention. The purpose of this study was to review all patients treated with secondary endovascular devices at our institution for failed EVAR procedures. Over an 8-year period, 988 patients underwent EVAR, of whom 42 (4.3%) required secondary interventions involving placement of additional endovascular devices. Data regarding patient characteristics, aneurysm size, initial device type, time until failure, failure etiology, secondary interventions, and outcomes were reviewed. The mean time from initial operation until second operation was 34.1 months. Failures included type I endoleaks in 38 patients (90.5%), type III endoleaks in two patients (4.8%), and enlarging aneurysms without definite endoleaks in two patients (4.8%). The overall technical success rate for secondary repair was 92.9% (39/42). Perioperative complications occurred in nine patients (21.4%), including wound complications (n = 6), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (n = 1), foot drop (n = 1), and death (n = 1). Mean follow-up following secondary repair was 16.4 months (range 1-50). Eighty-six percent of patients treated with aortouni-iliac devices had successful repairs compared to 45% of patients treated with proximal cuffs. Ten patients (23.8%) had persistent or recurrent type I or type III endoleaks following revision. Of these, four had tertiary interventions, including two patients who had additional devices placed. Failures following EVAR occur in a small but significant number of patients. When anatomically possible, endovascular revision offers a safe means of treating these failures. Aortouni-iliac devices appear to offer a more durable repair than the proximal cuff for treatment of proximal type I endoleaks. Midterm results indicate that these patients may require additional procedures but have a low rate of aneurysm-related mortality. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to determine the durability of these endovascular revisions.