Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit

BACKGROUND: Effective laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy usually mandates the use of an intraperitoneal prosthetic. Visceral adhesions and changes in textile characteristics of prosthetics may complicate repairs, especially long-term. The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion formation, tissue ingrowth, and textile characteristics one year after intra-abdominal placement of the commonly used prosthetic meshes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty (4 x 4 cm) meshes were sutured using absorbable suture to an intact peritoneum in 20 New Zealand white rabbits. The study groups included: polypropylene (PP) [Marlex; C.R. Bard Inc, Cranston, NJ], expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) [DualMesh; WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ], ePTFE and PP (ePTFE/PP) [Composix, C.R. Bard Inc], reduced weight PP and oxidized regenerated cellulose (rPP/C) [Proceed; Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ]. The meshes were explanted after one year. Adhesions were scored as a percentage of explanted biomaterials' affected surface area. Prosthetic shrinkage was calculated. The strength of incorporation and mesh compliance were evaluated using differential variable reluctance transducers. Mesh ingrowth was measured as the load necessary to distract the mesh/tissue complex. Mesh compliance was calculated as the change in linear displacement of the sensors due to applied load. The groups were compared using Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: ePTFE had significantly less adhesions (0%) than both ePTFE/PP (40%) and PP (80%) groups (P < 0.001). The mean area of adhesions for the rPP/C (10%) and the ePTFE/PP (14%) groups was less than that for the PP group (40%) (P = 0.02). Prosthetic shrinkage was greatest in the ePTFE (32%) group than in any other group (P = 0.001). There were no differences in mesh incorporation between the groups. At explantation, mesh compliance in the ePTFE group was superior to other meshes (P < 0.0001). The rPP/C mesh induced the smallest change in the compliance of the tissue adjacent to the mesh (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic materials demonstrate a wide variety of characteristics. Although exposed PP formed the most adhesions, up to 40% of the other PP-based meshes formed adhesions despite protective barriers. The ePTFE mesh did not induce adhesions and was the most compliant, however, this prosthetic's contraction was greatest. Reduced weight polypropylene (rPP/C) mesh induced the smallest change in the adjacent tissue pliability/compliance. Understanding of the long-term effects of various prosthetic materials is important to ensure an adequate hernia repair while minimizing postoperative morbidity and patient discomfort.     

Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: Influence of pore size and surface area

Background. Polypropylene is a material widely used in surgery. Because of its association with formation of enterocutaneous fistulae and adhesions, direct contact between mesh and intestine is avoided. The following study was designed to investigate the adhesive potential of different polypropylene meshes when placed in direct contact with intestine. Material and methods. In an established experimental model, a total of 45 chinchilla rabbits underwent laparoscopic placement of meshes with different pore size (Group I: monofilament PP 0.6 mm, Group II: monofilament PP 2.5 mm, Group III: multifilament PP 4.0 mm) with the Intra-Peritoneal-Onlay-Mesh Technique (IPOM). The degree of adhesion formation was measured after 7, 21, and 90 days, evaluated by an adhesion score, quantified by computer-assisted planimetry, followed by histological and morphometric investigation of the perifilamental granuloma formation. Results. The heavyweight, small porous polypropylene meshes (PP 0.6) showed significantly stronger adhesion formation at all intervals of investigation compared with the lightweight meshes with a pore size >2.5 mm. Between the two different lightweight mesh variations, there was no significant difference. Granuloma formation was lowest in large-pore-size monofilament meshes (PP 2.5). Conclusion. The IPOM rabbit model is suitable for investigation of biomaterials in the intra-abdominal position. Our results show that the adhesive potential is significantly influenced by the pore size. However, the extent of the foreign-body reaction seems also to be influenced by the filament structure, respectively, the surface area, favouring monofilament material.     

Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh

BACKGROUND: The development of intra-abdominal adhesions, bowel obstruction, and enterocutaneous fistulas are potentially severe complications related to the intraperitoneal placement of prosthetic biomaterials. The purpose of this study was to determine the natural history of adhesion formation to polypropylene mesh and two types of polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh when placed intraperitoneally in a rabbit model that simulates laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty New Zealand white rabbits were used for this study. A 10-cm midline incision was performed for intra-abdominal access and a 2 cm x 2 cm piece of mesh (n = 60) was sewn to an intact peritoneum on each side of the midline. Two types of ePTFE mesh (Dual Mesh and modified Dual Mesh, W.L. Gore & Assoc., Flagstaff, AZ) and polypropylene mesh were compared. The rate of adhesion formation was evaluated by direct visualization using microlaparoscopy (2-mm endoscope/trocar) at 7 days, 3 weeks, 9 weeks, and 16 weeks after mesh implantation. Adhesions to the prosthetic mesh were scored for extent (%) using the Modified Diamond Scale (0 = 0%, 1 50%). At necropsy the mesh was excised en bloc with the anterior abdominal wall for histological evaluation of mesothelial layer growth. RESULTS: The mean adhesion score for the polypropylene mesh was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than Dual Mesh at 9 weeks and 16 weeks and modified Dual Mesh at 7 days, 9 weeks, and 16 weeks. Fifty-five percent (n = 11) of the polypropylene mesh had adhesions to small intestine or omentum at necropsy compared to 30% (n = 6) of the Dual Mesh and 20% (n = 4) of the modified Dual Mesh. There was a significantly greater percentage (P < 0.003) of ePTFE mesh mesothelialized at explant (modified Dual Mesh 44.2%; Dual Mesh 55.8%) compared to the polypropylene mesh (12.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Serial microlaparoscopic evaluation of intraperitoneally implanted polypropylene mesh and ePTFE mesh in a rabbit model revealed a progression of adhesions to polypropylene mesh over a 16 week period. The pore size of mesh is critical in the development and maintenance of abdominal adhesions and tissue ingrowth. The macroporous polypropylene mesh promoted adhesion formation, while the microporous nature of the visceral side of the ePTFE served as a barrier to adhesions.     

Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model

Background

The intraperitoneal application of surgical mesh remains a controversial issue because of possible complications, especially adhesion and fistula formation. This study aimed to assess the potential of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh for intraabdominal implantation.

Methods

Twenty-eight 5?×?5?cm samples of knitted macroporous PTFE mesh and light-weight polypropylene mesh (LW-PP) were implanted intraperitoneally in 14 New Zealand white rabbits in a randomized manner and fixed using eight polypropylene stitches. After 90?days, the adhesion formation, adhesion score, shrinkage, strength of fixation to the abdominal wall, and histologic biocompatibility were assessed.

Results

No intraoperative or anesthesia-related complications or mesh infection were recorded. The average area covered by adhesions was 4.7?±?7.2% for the PTFE and 36.4?±?36.1% for the LW-PP. The median adhesion score was 0 for the PTFE and 8 for the LW-PP. Shrinkage was 36.9?±?12.9% for the PTFE mesh and 12.6?±?8.72% for the LW-PP. The mesh-to-abdominal wall fixation strength was almost the same for both materials (PTFE 3.6?±?1.9 vs. LW-PP 3.6?±?2.9). The inflammatory cell count was almost the same for the two groups, with no statistically significant difference. The width of the inner granuloma was equal (PTFE 10.5?±?0.9 vs. LW-PP 11.1?±?0.9). The outer granuloma was reduced significantly in the PTFE group (PTFE 23.0?±?2.1 vs. LW-PP 33.6?±?7.9). One of the animals in the PTFE group died on postoperative day 12 because of ileus. The reason was an adhesion of the small intestine to the polypropylene fixation stitch, which caused small intestine strangulation.

Conclusions

The knitted PTFE mesh induces fewer intraperitoneal adhesions of lower density than the light-weight polypropylene mesh. The strength of the knitted PTFE mesh fixation to the abdominal wall is comparable with that of the light-weight polypropylene mesh, but the shrinkage is greater. The biocompatibility of the knitted PTFE mesh is comparable with that of the light-weight polypropylene implant.     

不同材质补片固定大鼠膈肌后的炎症反应、粘连及补片皱缩情况对比研究

背景与目的：食管裂孔疝是外科常见病症，临床上多采用补片以无张力修补的方式进行治疗。食管裂孔疝的补片修补中补片的选择及其应用效果方面的实验数据仍相对缺乏。因此，本研究通过在大鼠食道裂孔处膈肌组织上分别固定聚丙烯补片和复合补片，比较两种材质补片对周围组织的影响，以及自身皱缩情况，为临床食管裂孔疝补片的选择提供参考。方法：雄性SD大鼠在分离胃部与肝脏相连接组织显露胃食道裂孔后，分别用单丝缝线将轻量聚丙烯补片（聚丙烯补片组）或复合补片（复合补片组）固定于食道裂孔处膈肌组织，或不进行补片固定（假手术组）。分别在术后7、15、30 d时记录每组每只大鼠的体质量和饮食量。观察30 d后处死大鼠，分析补片皱缩程度、粘连强度以及膈肌组织的病理学变化。结果：各组大鼠手术前后的体质量及每天进食量均无明显的变化（均P>0.05）。复合补片组膈肌组织与补片的粘连范围及粘连程度分值均明显低于聚丙烯补片组（均P<0.05）；两组补片均出现皱缩，但复合补片组术后补片面积明显大于聚丙烯补片组，皱缩率明显低于聚丙烯补片组（均P<0.05）；与假手术组比较，聚丙烯补片组和复合补片组膈肌组织出现局部肌纤维萎...     

Evaluation of adhesion formation and host tissue response to intra-abdominal polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and composite prosthetic mesh

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to measure the extent of adhesion formation to ePTFE mesh (DualMesh, W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ) and two composite prosthetic materials, ePTFE and polypropylene (Bard Composix, C.R. Bard, Inc, Murray Hill, NJ) and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose and polypropylene (Sepramesh, Genzyme Corp, Cambridge, MA) after their intra-abdominal placement on an intact peritoneum, simulating laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, and to evaluate host tissue response to the prosthetic biomaterials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through a midline laparotomy, a 2 x 2 cm piece of mesh (n = 60) was sewn to an intact peritoneum on each side of a midline incision in 30 New Zealand white rabbits. Mesh adhesions were scored using a modified Diamond scale (0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 >50%) at 1, 3, 9, and 16 weeks by serial microlaparoscopy (2 mm). All laparoscopic evaluations were videotaped for blinded scoring by three surgeons. Host tissue response was graded (1-4) for inflammation, tissue ingrowth, and mesothelialization. The predominant cell type (polymorphonuclear leukocytes versus foreign body giant cell) was recorded. Statistical differences (P value <0.05*) were measured using a two-tailed t test and Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The mean adhesion score was significantly (P < 0.001) less for ePTFE mesh at 1, 3, 9, and 16 weeks compared with the two composite prosthetic materials. There were no differences in the mean adhesion scores between the two biosurgical composite meshes at any of the time intervals. There were no differences in the mean score for inflammation, tissue ingrowth and mesothelialization between any of the prosthetic biomaterials. The predominant cell type on all histological evaluations was polymorphonuclear leukocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Placing ePTFE mesh (DualMesh) intra-abdominal against an intact peritoneum results in significantly fewer adhesions than the composite prosthetic meshes during a 4-month follow-up. The host tissue response is equivalent for the three prosthetic biomaterials. The long-term consequences of increased adhesion formation to the composite meshes and the ultimate biocompatibility of the nonabsorbable and absorbable barriers on the polypropylene mesh are to be determined.     

Comparison of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal mesh after laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the New Zealand White rabbit

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of early adhesiolysis on long-term adhesion formation after the intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene (PP) mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh in a rabbit model. Through a small midline laparotomy a 2 x 2-cm piece of mesh (n = 80) was sewn to an intact peritoneum on each side of a midline incision in 40 New Zealand White rabbits. Two types of ePTFE mesh [Dual Mesh (Dual) and modified Dual Mesh (C-Type), W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ] and PP mesh (Marlex, C.R. Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) were compared. In 10 rabbits (n = 20) a laparoscopic adhesiolysis (LapA) was performed at one week. Mesh adhesions were scored using a modified Diamond scale (0, 0%; 1, 1-25%; 2, 26-50%; and 3, > 50%) at 1, 3, 9, and 16 weeks by serial microlaparoscopic (2 mm) examinations. After recording the final adhesion score at 16 weeks the prosthetic biomaterials were excised en bloc with the anterior abdominal wall for histologic evaluation of mesothelial layer growth (%) on the visceral surface of the mesh. Statistical differences (P value < 0.05) were measured by chi-square and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. There were no statistical differences in mean adhesion scores at adhesiolysis at 7 days. The mean adhesion scores in the groups undergoing laparoscopic adhesiolysis was statistically less (P < 0.05) for PP and both ePTFE meshes at 3-, 9-, and 16-week intervals compared with those not undergoing adhesiolysis. The percentage of mesothelialization on the visceral surface of the mesh was not statistically different between the adhesiolysis and control groups for any of the prosthetic biomaterials. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis at one week minimizes subsequent adhesion formation to PP and ePTFE mesh over a 4-month follow-up. Adhesion formation within the first 7 days after mesh implantation appears to determine the long-term adhesion score. Eliminating adhesions to mesh by mechanical or other means during this critical time may control adhesions to the mesh and subsequent mesh-related complications.     

Composite prostheses for the repair of abdominal wall defects: effect of the structure of the adhesion barrier component

The component of a composite prosthesis, which makes contact with the visceral peritoneum, can be reabsorbable or non-reabsorbable, and laminar or reticular. This study was designed to determine whether the composition of this second, barrier component could improve its behavior at this interface. Abdominal wall defects in rabbits were repaired using a polypropylene prosthesis (PP), or the composites Sepramesh (PP+h) or Vicryl (PP+v). Fourteen days after surgery, the implants were evaluated by light and scanning electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry. Prosthetic areas occupied by adhesions (PP: 71.08±5.09, PP+h: 18.55±4.96, P+v: 69.69±16.81%), neoperitoneal thickness (PP: 256.17±21.68, PP+h: 83.11±19.63, PP+v:213.72±35.90 μm) and macrophage counts (PP: 8.73±1.16, PP+h: 27.33±4.13, PP+v: 31.24±3.08%) showed significant differences (P<0.05). The tested biomaterials induced an optimal recipient tissue infiltration. Least adhesion formation was observed on the PP+h implants. This suggests that the second component, although reabsorbable, should be smooth in structure.     

Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair

Background: Supplementary polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) monofilaments were added to a lightweight pure monofilament polypropylene mesh (PP mesh) to improve intraoperative handling (PP+M mesh). This study was designed to evaluate the influence of this additional supplementation on the biocompatibility in a rodent animal model. Methods: Two mesh materials, a composite mesh (PP+M) and the pure polypropylene variant (PP), were compared after subcutaneous implantation in a standardized rat model. Histological analysis of the inflammatory response was performed after 28, 56 and 84 days of implantation. Material absorption, inflammatory tissue reaction, fibrosis and granuloma formation were investigated, as well as the percentage of proliferating and apoptotic cells at the interface. Results: Both mesh materials showed a slight foreign body reaction involving mainly macrophages and foreign body giant cells. Total absorption of the Monocryl filaments of the PP+M mesh occurred between 56 and 84 days of implantation. Both the inflammatory and the fibrotic reaction were decreased (n.s.) in the PP+M mesh group compared to the pure PP mesh. Whereas the percentage of proliferating cells showed no significant difference, the rate of apoptotic cells was significantly decreased in the PP+M mesh group over the whole implantation period. Conclusion: Compared to the pure polypropylene mesh, our data confirm that the use of a polypropylene mesh supplemented with absorbable Monocryl filaments is feasible without additional short-term mesh-related complications in the experimental model or negative side effects on biocompatibility.     

Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair requires an intraperitoneal prosthetic; however, these materials are not without consequences. We evaluated host reaction to intraperitoneal placement of various prosthetics and the functional outcomes in an animal model. Mesh (n = 15 per mesh type) was implanted on intact peritoneum in New Zealand white rabbits. The mesh types included ePTFE (DualMesh), ePTFE and polypropylene (Composix), polypropylene and oxidized regenerated cellulose (Proceed), and polypropylene (Marlex). Adhesion formation was evaluated at 1, 4, 8, and 16 weeks using 2-mm mini-laparoscopy. Adhesion area, adhesion tenacity, prosthetic shrinkage, and compliance were evaluated after mesh explantation at 16 weeks. DualMesh had significantly less adhesions than Proceed, Composix, or Marlex at 1, 4, 8, and 16 weeks (P < 0.0001). Marlex had significantly more adhesions than other meshes at each time point (P < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in adhesions between Proceed and Composix meshes. After mesh explantation, the mean area of adhesions for Proceed (4.6%) was less than for Marlex (21.7%; P = 0.001). The adhesions to Marlex were statistically more tenacious than the DualMesh and Composix groups. Overall prosthetic shrinkage was statistically greater for DualMesh (34.7%) than for the remaining mesh types (P < 0.01). Mesh compliance was similar between the groups. Prosthetic materials demonstrate a wide variety of characteristics when placed inside the abdomen. Marlex formed more adhesions with greater tenacity than the other mesh types. DualMesh resulted in minimal adhesions, but it shrank more than the other mesh types. Each prosthetic generates a varied host reaction. Better understanding of these reactions can allow a suitable prosthetic to be chosen for a given patient in clinical practice.     

Relationship Between Tissue Ingrowth and Mesh Contraction

Contraction is a well-documented phenomenon occurring within two months of mesh implantation. Its etiology is unknown, but it is suggested to occur as a result of inadequate tissue ingrowth into the mesh and has been associated with hernia recurrence. In continuation of our previous studies, we compared tissue ingrowth characteristics of large patches of polyester (PE) and heavyweight polypropylene (PP) and their effect on mesh contraction. The materials used were eight PE and eight PP meshes measuring 10 × 10 cm². After random assignment to the implantation sites, the meshes were fixed to the abdominal wall fascia of swine using interrupted polypropylene sutures. A necropsy was performed three months after surgery for evaluation of mesh contraction/shrinkage. Using a tensiometer, tissue ingrowth was assessed by measuring the force necessary to detach the mesh from the fascia. Histologic analysis included inflammatory and fibroblastic reactions, scored on a 0–4 point scale. One swine developed a severe wound infection that involved two PP meshes and was therefore excluded from the study. The mean area covered by the PE meshes (87 ± 7 cm²) was significantly larger than the area covered by the PP meshes (67 ± 14 cm²) (p = 0.006). Tissue ingrowth force of the PE meshes (194 ± 37 N) had a trend toward being higher than that of the PP meshes (159 ± 43 N), although it did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in histologic inflammatory and fibroblastic reactions between mesh types. There was a significant correlation between tissue ingrowth force and mesh size (p = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.05–0.84). Our results confirm those from previous studies in that mesh materials undergo significant contraction after suture fixation to the fascia. PE resulted in less contraction than polypropylene. A strong integration of the mesh into the tissue helps prevent this phenomenon, which is evidenced by a significant correlation between tissue ingrowth force and mesh size. Presented at the Southeastern Surgical Congress 2004 Meeting, Atlanta, GA, January 31–February 3, 2004 This study was sponsored by Promethian Surgical Devices, Boston, MA, USA.     

Peritoneal effects of prosthetic meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects: monitoring adhesions by sequential laparoscopy

BACKGROUND: The prosthetic materials currently used to repair abdominal wall defects sometimes have to be placed in contact with the visceral peritoneum. This interface is often a site of complications such as intestinal obstruction or fistulas due to adhesions. The aim of this study was to follow the process of adhesion formation in several prosthetic materials by sequential laparoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Defects (7 x 5 cm) were created in the abdominal wall of 30 New Zealand White rabbits and repaired using Surgipro polypropylene mesh (PP), Ultrapro monocryl-prolene mesh (UP), Dual Mesh expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), Composix (PP-ePTFE), Parietex Composite (polyester with collagen-polyethylene glycol-glycerol coating [PO-gl]), or PL-PU99 (PP-polyurethane) patches fixed to the edges of the defect by running polypropylene suture. Adhesions to the implants were laparoscopically determined at 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery. RESULTS: Percentage adhesion scores were significantly lower for ePTFE, PP-ePTFE, PO-gl, and PP-PU, compared to PP or UP. No differences were observed in adhesion scores recorded at 3, 7, and 14 days postimplant. Reticular prostheses were infiltrated by disorganized scar tissue with fibers concentric to the mesh filaments. In contrast, ePTFE implants were encapsulated by organized tissue, with fibers running parallel to the surface of biomaterial. All three composites achieved good recipient tissue integration and a homogeneous, organized, and well-vascularized neoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: At 14 days postimplant, laminar prostheses and composites showed similar results in terms of adhesion formation and integration within host tissue. Our findings suggest that both the composite prostheses and the laminar ePTFE performed very well in terms of reduced adhesion formation at the peritoneal interface.     

Comparison of Long-Term Biocompability of PVDF and PP Meshes

ABSTRACT

Background: Abdominal hernia repair is the most frequently performed operation in surgery. Mesh repair in hernia surgery has become an integral component. Although meshes made of PVDF are already in clinical use, so far no data of long-term biocompability are available. Methods: In this study a PVDF mesh was compared to a polypropylene mesh with regard to its long-term biocompatibility. A total of 28 rats were randomized to two groups. Mesh material was implanted subcutaneously; animals were euthanized seven days and six months postoperatively. The quantity of inflammatory tissue response was characterized by measuring the diameter of the foreign body granuloma. Furthermore quality of cellular immune response (T-lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils), and inflammation (COX-2) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Furthermore the collagen type I/III ratio was determined. Results: Macrophages, T-lymphocytes, neutrophiles, and COX-2 declined significantly up to six months postoperatively in comparison to day 7 for both PVDF and PP meshes, and in both groups the collagen ratio increased significantly in the course of time. PVDF meshes showed a foreign body granuloma size significantly reduced compared to PP (7 days: 20 ± 2 μm vs. 27 ± 2 μm; 6 months 15 ± 2 μm vs. 22 ± 3 μm; p < .001). However no significant differences were found analyzing cellular response six months postoperatively. Conclusions: Our current data suggest that even in the long-term course after six months and despite a higher effective surface of the PVDF samples it showed a smaller foreign body granuloma than with PP whereas the cellular response was similar.     

Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model

Intraperitoneal placement of prosthetic mesh causes adhesion formation after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. A prosthesis that prevents or reduces adhesion formation is desirable. In this study, 21 pigs were randomized to receive laparoscopic placement of plain polypropylene mesh (PPM), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), or polypropylene coated on one side with a bioresorbable adhesion barrier (PPM/HA/CMC). The animals were sacrificed after 28 days and evaluated for adhesion formation. Mean area of adhesion formation was 14% (SD±15) in the PPM/HA/CMC group, 40% (SD±17) in the PPM group, and 41% (SD±39) in the ePTFE group. The difference between PPM/HA/CMC and PPM was significant (P=0.013). A new visceral layer of mesothelium was present in seven out of seven PPM/HA/CMC cases, six out of seven PPM cases, and two out of seven ePTFE cases. Thus, laparoscopic placement of PPM/HA/CMC reduces adhesion formation compared to other mesh types used for laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs.This work was presented as an oral presentation at the American Hernia Society Meeting, Tucson, Ariz. USA in May, 2002.This study was funded by a grant from Genzyme, Corp., Cambridge, Mass. USA     

Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh

Background  The potential for shrinkage of intraperitoneally implanted meshes for laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia (LRVIH) remains a concern. Numerous experimental studies on this issue reported very inconsistent results. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh has the unique property of being revealed by computed tomography (CT). We therefore conducted an analysis of CT findings in patients who had previously undergone LRVIH with an ePTFE mesh (DualMesh, WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) in order to evaluate the shrinkage of implanted meshes. Patients and methods  Of 656 LRVIH patients with DualMesh, all patients who subsequently underwent CT scanning were identified and only those with precisely known transverse diameter of implanted mesh and with CT scans made more than 3 months postoperatively were selected (n = 40). Two radiologists who were blinded to the size of the implanted mesh measured in consensus the maximal transverse diameter of the meshes by using the AquariusNET program (TeraRecon Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA). Mesh shrinkage was defined as the relative loss of transverse diameter as compared with the original transverse diameter of the mesh. Results  The mean time from LRVIH to CT scan was 17.9 months (range 3–59 months). The mean shrinkage of the mesh was 7.5% (range 0–23.7%). For 11 patients (28%) there was no shrinkage at all. Shrinkage of 1–10% was found in 16 patients (40%), of 10–20% in 10 patients (25%), and of 20–24% in 3 patients (7.5%). No correlation was found regarding the elapsed time between LRVIH and CT, and shrinkage. There were two recurrences, one possibly related to shrinkage. Conclusion  Our observations indicate that shrinkage of DualMesh is remarkably lower than has been reported in experimental studies (8–51%). This study is the first to address the problem of shrinkage after intraperitoneal implantation of synthetic mesh in a clinical material.     

Experimental study of inflammatory response and collagen morphometry with different types of meshes

Purpose

To compare an inflammation score and collagen morphometry after incisional hernia repair with four different meshes at two time points.

Methods

Four types of mesh were used to repair an abdominal wall incisional defect in Wistar rats: high-density polypropylene (HW/PP); low-density polypropylene (LW/PP); polypropylene mesh encapsulated with polydioxanone coated with oxidized cellulose (PP/CE); and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). An inflammation score based on histological analysis and collagen morphometry was performed after 7 and 28 days after operation (POD).

Results

Compared to LW/PP group at 7 POD, HW/PP group had lower (p = 0.014) and PP/CE group had higher inflammation scores (p = 0.001). At 28 POD, higher scores were seen in all the other groups compared to the LW/PP group (HW/PP, p = 0.046; PP/CE, p < 0.001; ePTFE, p = 0.027). Comparing groups individually at 7 and 28 PODs, all demonstrated lower inflammation score values at 28 POD (HW/PP, p < 0.001; LW/PP, p < 0.001; PP/CE, p = 0.002; ePTFE, p = 0.001). At 7 POD, higher amounts of collagen were detected in ePTFE compared to HW/PP (p < 0.001) and LW/PP (p = 0.004) and in PPCE group compared to HW/PP (p = 0.022). At 28 POD, no statistically significant difference was found. Comparing groups individually at 7 and 28 PODs, HW/PP and LW/PP showed larger amounts of collagen at the 28th POD, without any statistically significant differences for the PP/CE and ePTFE groups.

Conclusions

Inflammation scores decreased in all groups at 28 POD. Collagen deposition was higher for non-composite meshes at 28 POD.

     

A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh

Background The ideal mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is not yet identified.Methods We laparoscopically placed polypropylene (PPM), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), and polyester with antiadhesive collagen layer (PCO) in eight pigs using sutures and tacks for fixation. After 28-day survival, we compared adhesion formation, fibrous ingrowth, and shrinkage among the types of mesh.Results Mean area of adhesions to PCO (8.25%) was less than that to ePTFE (57.14%, p < 0.001) or PPM (79.38%, p < 0.001). Adhesions peel strength was less for PCO (2.3 N) than for PPM (16.1 N, p < 0.001) or ePTFE (8.8 N, p = 0.02). Peel strength of mesh from the abdominal wall was less for ePTFE (1.3 N/cm of mesh width) than for PCO (2.8 N/cm, p = 0.001) or PPM (2.1 N/cm, p = 0.05). ePTFE area (94.4 cm²) was less than that for PCO (118.6 cm², p < 0.001) or PPM (140.7 cm², p < 0.02).Conclusion PCO had fewer and less severe adhesions than ePTFE or PPM while facilitating excellent ingrowth of the adjacent parietal tissue.     

Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair

Purpose  

To evaluate the biocompatibility of heavyweight polypropylene (HWPP), lightweight polypropylene (LWPP), and monofilament knit polytetrafluoroethylene (mkPTFE) mesh by comparing biomechanics and histologic response at 1, 3, and 5 months in a porcine model of incisional hernia repair.     

Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Five Different Prosthetic Materials Used in Hernioplasty

This experimental study was designed to assess and to compare intra-abdominal adhesions following the use of five commercially available prosthetic mesh grafts in the repair if abdominal wall defects. Sixty Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10). A 2 × 1 cm defect at abdominal wall was created and defects were closed either primarily or with one of the following prosthetic mesh grafts: monofilament polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-coated polypropylene, polypropylene/polyglactin 910 composite, or resorbable hydrophilic collagen-coated multifiber polyester. The severity of adhesions was graded, tensile strengths of adhesions were measured, and histopathological grades of inflammation and fibrosis were evaluated. Polypropylene mesh resulted in more adhesion formation in comparison to primary repair and other grafts used in this study, except polypropylene/polyglactin 910 composite mesh. In addition, the highest tensile strength of omental adhesions was detected in the polypropylene group (χ² = 26.249; p =. 0001). Polyester composite mesh caused the least adhesion formation among the groups. Sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-coated polypropylene and polyester composite meshes revealed the highest fibrosis scores (χ² = 50.776; p =. 0001). The highest inflammatory activity was detected in the polytetrafluoroethylene mesh group (χ² = 16.564; p =. 005). Thus, sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-coated polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene meshes following polyester composite mesh were the minimal adhesion-forming grafts in this study. Disadvantages of the polytetrafluoroethylene mesh were lower fibrotic activity and higher inflammatory reaction to the graft.