Die Hakendachschale in der Revision schwieriger gelockerter Hüftprothesenpfannen

The long-term results of acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a reinforcement ring with hook were evaluated. The study included 57 cases of surgery dating back 10 years or more. Of a total of 54 patients (57 operated hips), 18 patients (19 hips) died during the 10-year period and 2 patients (2 hips) were completely lost to follow-up. At the time of the revision surgery, the mean age of the remaining 34 patients (36 hips) was 62.5 years (range: 47-80). A THA revision was done in 25 cases and an acetabular revision only in 11 cases. The most common acetabular defect was a combined segmental and cavitary defect (n = 19), and in three cases there was pelvic discontinuity. Autologous or homologous cancellous bone grafts were used to fill acetabular cavities in 17 hip joints. Structured bone grafts, predominantly homologous bone, were used in ten cases for acetabular reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 11.4 years (range: 10-14.5) three hip joints (8%) had undergone further revision. The revisions were done for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in two cases and a septic loosening of both components in one case. Three further cases (8%) revealed signs of acetabular loosening. Two of these three patients were symptomatic but refused further revision surgery. In the 33 unrevised hip joints, a good or excellent clinical result with a d'Aubingé score of more than 14 points was found in 30 cases (92%). Osseous acetabular reconstruction with the use of a reinforcement ring leads to favorable results compared to other techniques. In the authors' opinion, this technique is preferable to those using oversized cups without osseous reconstruction of the acetabulum.     

Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note

BACKGROUND: Revision of an acetabular component that has failed after a total hip arthroplasty in which a bulk femoral head autogenous graft or allograft was used as a structural graft for acetabular reconstruction is an uncommon but complex and challenging procedure. We previously reported the results for seventy hips at an average of 16.5 years after a total hip arthroplasty in which an acetabular reconstruction had been performed with a femoral head graft. In the present study, we evaluated a subset of nine hips from that series that had a subsequent revision of the acetabular component without cement. The purpose of the current study was to assess the usefulness of the bone graft in this revision. METHODS: The nine patients (nine hips) were followed clinically and radiographically for an average of seventy-six months (range, sixty-one to 114 months) after the index revision. In six hips the autogenous femoral head graft previously had been bolted to the lateral side of the ilium, and in one hip the femoral head allograft had been affixed in this manner. In the two remaining hips, the allograft had been placed within the acetabulum. The hips were classified according to the extent of acetabular bone loss, with use of criteria described previously. Three hips had stage-I bone loss; four, stage-II; and two, stage-IIB. A porous-coated hemispherical acetabular component was inserted without cement and fixed with screws in each hip. At least 70 percent of the porous coating was in contact with viable bone. RESULTS: At the time of the latest follow-up after the index revision, all nine acetabular components were functioning well without loosening or osteolysis and none had been revised. The average Harris hip score was 77 points (range, 61 to 98 points) compared with 49 points (range, 27 to 96 points) preoperatively. One hip had had revision of the femoral stem, and another had had exchange of the acetabular liner because of recurrent dislocations. There was no additional resorption of the residual bulk graft that was in contact with the metal shell in any hip. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series of complex acetabular revisions, the healed bulk graft provided valuable additional bone stock for the support of an acetabular component that was inserted without cement. Insertion of the acetabular component into the available bone, which consisted in major part of host bone and in minor part of united revascularized bulk graft, resulted in a well functioning hip after an intermediate duration of follow-up. In all except two hips, the enlarged bone stock allowed insertion of a larger acetabular component than had been used previously.     

THA翻修术中髋臼骨缺损的处理策略

目的探讨全髋关节置换术（THA）翻修术中髋臼骨缺损重建的方法及疗效。方法回顾1999年6月至2007年5月,在THA翻修术中处理的髋臼骨缺损112例（117髋）。根据Saleh KJ的改良分型法,Ⅰ型缺损14髋、Ⅱ型缺损26髋、Ⅲ型缺损47髋、Ⅵ型缺损16髋、Ⅴ型缺损14髋。分别采用大直径非骨水泥假体臼、非骨水泥假体臼＋松质颗粒植骨、骨水泥假体臼＋Cage＋松质颗粒植骨和骨水泥假体臼＋定制型假体＋松质颗粒植骨,对不同类型骨缺损进行修复。术后定期随访,采用Harris方法评估髋关节功能,根据X线片判断假体是否有松动,移植骨是否愈合。结果随访时间平均45（13～118）个月。除4髋因脱位或假体周围骨折进行再翻修外,其余效果良好。术后Harris评分平均86.2分,较术前平均改善40.6分。X线片无假体松动下沉,可见移植骨-宿主骨交界处有连续性小梁骨通过。结论在THA翻修术中,大部分髋臼骨缺损可使用较大型号非骨水泥假体或加松质颗粒植骨进行修复;对于影响假体稳定性的较大缺损,使用骨水泥假体臼＋Cage＋松质颗粒植骨的方法可获得良好效果;定制型假体在处理严重髋臼骨缺损中有具独特优势,有良好的临床应用前景。     

髋臼加强环联合同种异体骨植骨重建髋臼在髋关节翻修中的应用

目的总结髋臼加强环(Cage)联合同种异体骨植骨重建髋臼在髋关节翻修术中的应用及疗效。方法 2006年2月-2010年8月,对14例(14髋)行人工全髋关节翻修术的重度髋臼骨缺损患者采用Cage联合同种异体骨植骨重建髋臼。男6例,女8例;年龄45～76岁,平均59.2岁。初次置换至此次翻修术时间为5～12年,平均7.2年。翻修原因:感染8例,骨溶解及假体松动6例。术前髋关节功能Harris评分为(37.7±5.3)分。髋臼骨缺损按照美国骨科医师协会(AAOS)分型标准:Ⅲ型8例,Ⅳ型6例。结果术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无坐骨神经损伤、下肢深静脉血栓形成等并发症发生。患者均获随访,随访时间14～62个月,平均44个月。患者疼痛症状均明显缓解或消失。末次随访时髋关节Harris评分为(89.7±3.2)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(t=—44.40,P=0.04)。X线片示髋臼假体均无松动,植骨未见明显吸收,并逐渐与宿主骨融合。结论在髋关节翻修时,采用Cage联合同种异体骨植骨能有效修复髋臼骨缺损并重建髋臼,近期疗效满意,远期疗效尚需进一步随访观察。     

应用非骨水泥髋臼或金属髋臼支架行髋关节翻修术的临床研究

目的 评估非骨水泥髋臼及金属髋臼支架加植骨修复髋臼骨缺损的效果.方法 我院自2001年9月至2008年9月应用髋臼翻修支架行髋关节翻修术22例(24髋).其中Lima非骨水泥人工翻修髋臼2例(2髋),Kerboull 支架2例(2髋),GAP 髋臼翻修支架18例(20髋).男性6例(6髋),女性16例(18髋).平均年龄62岁(34～79岁).感染性松动2例(2髋),无菌松动20例(22髋).平均随访时间48个月(18～84个月),对其进行临床和影像学评估.Harris评分术前平均为56分(44～75分).结果 末次随访时22例患者Harris评分平均为89分(78～94分).优良率为95.5%(21/22).三种髋臼翻修支架的外展角满意,髋臼旋转中心基本得到了重建.髋臼翻修支架及其聚氯乙烯臼无明显移位,假体周围无透亮线,髋臼植骨愈合良好.结论 应用非骨水泥髋臼或髋臼支架修复髋臼侧巨大骨缺损,重建了髋臼正常旋转中心、提供了翻修假体的初期稳定性、避免了所植骨在血管化时期的过度机械负重,是翻修髋臼巨大骨缺损的可靠方法.     

Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Extra-large uncemented components provide several advantages for acetabular revision, but limited information is available on the results of their use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, at a minimum of five years, the results associated with the use of an extra-large uncemented porous-coated component for acetabular revision in the presence of bone loss. METHODS: Eighty-nine extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components were used for revision after aseptic failure of a total hip arthroplasty in forty-six men and forty-three women (mean age at revision, fifty-nine years; range, thirty to eighty-three years). The revision implant (a Harris-Galante-I or II cup fixed with screws) had an outside diameter of > or = 66 mm in men and > or = 62 mm in women. Seventy-nine patients had a segmental or combined segmental and cavitary acetabular bone deficiency before the revision. Particulate bone graft was used in fifty-four hips and bulk bone graft, in nine. RESULTS: One patient died with the acetabular component intact and two patients were lost to follow-up within five years after the operation. At the time of the last follow--up, four acetabular components had been removed or revised again (two for aseptic loosening). All of the remaining patients were followed clinically for at least five years (mean, 7.2 years; range, 5.0 to 11.3 years). In the hips that were not revised again, only two sockets had definite radiographic evidence of loosening. All four of the sockets that loosened were in hips that had had combined cavitary and segmental bone loss preoperatively. In the hips that were not revised again, the mean modified Harris hip score increased from 56 points preoperatively to 83 points at the time of the most recent follow-up. The most frequent complication, dislocation of the hip, occurred in eleven patients. The probability of survival of the acetabular component at eight years was 93% (95% confidence interval, 85% to 100%) with removal for any reason as the end point, 98% (95% confidence interval, 92% to 100%) with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point, and 95% (95% confidence interval, 88% to 100%) with radiographic evidence of loosening or revision for aseptic loosening as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that extra-large uncemented components used for acetabular revision in the presence of bone loss perform very well and have a low rate of aseptic loosening at the time of intermediate-term follow-up.     

The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty

We report 5-year minimum results of cementless over-sized cups used in revision hip arthroplasty, with significant associated bone defects. Forty-three porous-coated jumbo cups were used to treat acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty in 42 patients with a mean age of 63 (range, 25-86). Morsellized allograft only was used in 27 hips, and bulk allograft was used in 8 cases. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and 5 died after a mean 7 years' follow-up, with retention of their prostheses. In the remaining 36 cases, the mean follow-up was 10 years (range, 6-14 years). Two acetabular components were revised for aseptic loosening and graft resorption. Two cases were complicated by dislocation. A satisfactory 92% Kaplan Meier shell survival rate was seen at 14 years.     

Long-term results of bulk femoral head autograft in cementless THA for developmental hip dysplasia

We evaluated the fate of bulk femoral head autograft in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) for developmental hip dysplasia. Of 87 hips (80 patients) studied, 37 hips (32 patients) were available for follow-up at a mean of 18.5 years (range, 15-24 years) postoperatively. The mean age of these 32 patients at the index procedure was 53.8 years (range, 40-65 years). The initial diagnosis was osteoarthritis in all 32 patients. The degree of acetabular dysplasia according to Crowe classification was type I in 18 hips (48.6%), type II in 14 (37.8%), type III in 5 (13.5%). The mean percentage of horizontal coverage of the acetabular components with graft bone was 34% (range, 25%-45%). Trabecular bridging across the graft-host interface was seen at a mean of 4 months (range, 2-6 months) postoperatively. Trabecular reorientation of the grafted bone was seen in all hips at a mean of 27 months (range, 12-36 months) postoperatively. There was no evidence of collapse and bony resorption of the grafted bone in the weight-bearing portion. Acetabular component fixation was stable in all hips at final follow-up. Of the 37 hips (32 patients), 2 acetabular components required revision: 1 for a late postoperative deep infection and 1 for dissociation of the polyethylene liner. The survival rate was 94.5% (95% confidence interval, 91.3-96.5) for the acetabular component at 18.5 years of follow-up. This study found that bulk femoral head autograft in cementless THA for developmental hip dysplasia produces excellent long-term results.     

颗粒骨打压植骨结合多孔非骨水泥臼杯在AAOSⅢ型髋臼大面积骨缺损翻修中的应用

背景：颗粒骨打压植骨是修复髋臼骨缺损的重要方法,对大面积髋臼骨缺损采用打压植骨结合非骨水泥臼杯重建仍然存在争议。目的：探讨同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨结合多孔非骨水泥臼杯髋臼重建术修复AAOSⅢ型髋臼大面积骨缺损的方法及近期疗效。方法：随访2005年6月至2010年4月收治的28例（28髋）AA0SⅢ型髋臼大面积骨缺损患者。男18例,女10例,年龄34-74岁,平均53．8岁。髋关节置换术后感染醐翻修9例,骨溶解及髋臼假体松动翻修19例。本组AAOSⅢ型髋臼骨缺损面积大,术中见髋臼骨缺损超过髋臼关节面的50％。全部采用同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨结合多孔非骨水泥臼杯髋臼重建术。术后定期随访,观察臼杯有无松动、植入骨与宿主骨整合情况,髋关节功能评分采用Harris评分。结果：28例均获得随访,术后随访时间为13-70个月,平均43个月。Harris评分由术前32-48分,平均41分,提高至末次随访时86-95分,平均90分。28例髋臼假体均固定牢固无松动征象,植入骨逐渐与宿主骨整合,无感染及坐骨神经损伤。结论：在获得臼杯初始稳定固定的情况下,大面积颗粒骨打压植骨（臼杯与宿主骨接触面积〈50％）结合多孔非骨水泥臼杯髋臼重建术修复AAOSⅢ型髋臼大面积骨缺损近期疗效较好,远期疗效尚待进一步随访。     

Cementless total hip arthroplasty using an autograft of the femoral head for marked acetabular dysplasia: case series

PURPOSE: To assess the short-term outcome of cementless total hip arthroplasty involving an autograft of the femoral head in Japanese patients. METHODS: Cementless total hip arthroplasty with autogenous bone block grafting was performed on 18 hips in 15 patients with marked acetabular dysplasia. The resected femoral head was used as a graft for the superior-lateral region of the true acetabulum. Clinical outcome was correlated with the placement of the acetabular component, as revealed in radiographs. RESULTS: The 13 women and 2 men had a mean age of 60.2 years (range, 37.0-73.0 years) at primary surgery and a mean follow-up duration of 3.3 years (range, 2.0-5.3 years). According to the classification of Crowe, 4 hips were in group I, 3 were in group II, one in group III, and 10 in group IV. The mean Harris Hip Score preoperatively was 45.7 (range, 19-69) and that at follow-up was 82.5 (range, 44-100). All 15 cases showed a good clinical outcome. There were no major intra-operative complications in this series. The grafted bones united in all patients. Two patients need surgical revision because the lateral insertion of the acetabular component resulted in loosening of it. CONCLUSION: Medial insertion of the acetabular component provides satisfactory short-term outcomes. Lateral insertion of the acetabular component during total hip arthroplasty should be avoided in patients with marked acetabular dysplasia.     

全髋关节翻修术中髋臼骨缺损的重建

目的探讨全髋关节置换术（THA）后，翻修术中髋臼骨缺损重建的方法及疗效。方法对81例（84髋）在THA翻修术中处理的髋臼骨缺损患者进行回顾性分析，根据AAOS分型法，Ⅰ型7髋，Ⅱ型56髋，Ⅲ型17髋，Ⅳ型4髋。分别采用大直径非骨水泥假体臼、非骨水泥假体臼＋松质颗粒植骨、骨水泥假体臼＋Cage＋松质颗粒植骨和骨水泥假体臼＋定制型假体＋松质颗粒植骨等方法，对不同类型骨缺损的患者进行修复。术后定期随访，采用Harris方法评估髋关节功能，根据X线片判断假体是否有松动，移植骨是否愈合。结果对本组患者进行术后随访，平均随访45个月（13～118个月）。术后Harris评分平均86．2分，较术前平均改善40．6分。2髋因脱位需进行再翻修，其余效果良好，X线片无假体松动下沉，可见移植骨一宿主骨交界处有连续性小梁骨通过。结论在THA翻修术中，大部分髋臼骨缺损可使用较大型号非骨水泥假体或加松质颗粒植骨进行修复；对于影响假体稳定性的较大缺损，使用骨水泥假体臼＋Cage＋松质颗粒植骨的方法可获得良好效果；定制型假体在处理严重髋臼骨缺损中有独特优势，具有良好的临床应用前景。     

Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is an ever-increasing number of failed hip arthroplasties associated with massive deficiency of acetabular bone stock consisting of a segmental or cavitary defect. This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term results after use of morselized cryopreserved allogeneic bone graft and an antiprotrusio cage to treat such a deficiency. METHODS: From January 1, 1988, to January 1, 1994, forty-one patients (forty-one hips) with an acetabular defect classified as type IIl or IV according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons system were operated on with use of a Burch-Schneider ring and morselized cryopreserved allogeneic cancellous bone graft. Thirty-eight patients (thirty-eight hips) were available for clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations at an average of 7.3 years (range, 4.2 to 9.4 years) after surgery. RESULTS: All measured clinical parameters had improved significantly by the time of the follow-up examination (p < 0.0001). Radiographs confirmed that none of the thirty-eight hips had any measurable migration or displacement of the acetabular component and that osseous consolidation occurred only within the grafted area in all patients. CONCLUSION: Acetabular reconstruction with use of morselized cryopreserved allogeneic cancellous bone graft and the Burch-Schneider ring can be highly successful in managing massive acetabular deficiencies in revision hip arthroplasty.     

Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a 10- to 17-year follow-up study

During the period 1979 through 1986, 69 acetabular reconstructions in 63 patients were performed with the use of autologous morcellized bone-grafts because of acetabular bone stock loss. Nine cases (10 hips) were lost to follow-up. Eleven patients (12 hips) died <10 years after surgery; none had a revision. The results for the remaining 43 patients (47 hips) were reviewed at an average interval of 12.3 years (range, 10-17 years). No preoperative Harris hip score was available. The average Harris hip score at follow-up was 88 (range, 60-100). Radiographically, all grafts united. One hip developed a deep infection. Three other hips (6%) were revised because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. An additional 3 acetabular components were considered radiographic failures. Excluding the infected case, the overall survival rate of these acetabular reconstructions with a revision as endpoint was 94% at an average follow-up of 12.3 years. Reconstruction of acetabular bone stock loss with autologous morcellized bone-grafts is an attractive technique with a good potential for long-term success.     

The use of bilobed porous-coated acetabular components without structural bone graft for type III acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up

A prospective analysis was undertaken of 11 hips (in 11 patients) that underwent revision acetabuloplasties with bilobed, porous-coated, acetabular implants without the use of structural bone graft for type III acetabular defects. The average patient age was 66.3 years, with an average follow-up of 38 months (range, 24-49 months). No acetabular components required or are pending revision surgery. Average pain and hip scores improved from 8 and 36 preoperatively to 42 and 89 postoperatively, respectively. Average leg-length differences decreased from 34 mm preoperatively to 7 mm postoperatively. The use of bilobed acetabular components without structural bone graft is a feasible alternative for reconstructing type III acetabular defects, and can provide good short-term clinical results, while reconstructing the hip center and maximizing host-implant contact.     

Porous-Coated Cementless Acetabular Components Without Bulk Bone Graft in Revision Surgery

We previously reported the average 9.3-year (range, 5-13 years) results of 74 patients (83 hips) with porous-coated acetabular components that were placed without bulk bone graft at revision surgery. Since the previous report, 7 patients (7 hips) died before the minimum follow-up of 10 years, and 1 patient (1 hip) was lost to follow-up. We now report the average 15.6-year (range, 10-20 years) results for 66 patients (75 hips). Three additional acetabular components were removed or revised again: 2 for infection and 1 for dislodgement of the polyethylene liner from the metal shell. Overall, 7 (7%) components required removal or repeat revision. No shell was revised for aseptic loosening, and none was categorized as loose during the entire follow-up period.     

Bone graft incorporation after revision hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, seventy eight revisions using bone allografts with or without metal reinforcements

Purpose

The aim of the study was to assess bone graft incorporation after revision hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We report an acetabular reconstruction using impacted, morselized, frozen, radiation sterilized bone allografts in 71 patients suffering from RA. There were sixty-six women and five men at a mean age of 57.5 years. Reconstruction was performed in 78 revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) for aseptic loosening of acetabular component. The mean follow-up was five years and four months. In 38 cases, a revision was done with use of reinforcement devices.

Results

In four revised hips (10 %) without reinforcement implants, resorption of the allografts was noticed. All Mueller rings and 50 % of unscrews cages (Link, Howmedica) were revised because of aseptic loosening and bone graft resorption. In all of 17 hips with the Burch-Schneider cage, no measurable migration or bone allografts resorption occurred. There were no major general complications.

Conclusions

Acetabular reconstruction with use of morselized, frozen, radiation sterilized bone allografts and the Burch-Schneider cage can be highly successful in managing massive deficiency of acetabular bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty in RA patients.     

异体骨移植在髋关节翻修术中应用的1O年随访

目的探讨异体骨移植在髋关节翻修术中应用的长期效果。方法自1997年6月至2000年12月,共进行15例15髋髋关节翻修术,得到随访13例13髋,男9例9髋,女4例4髋;左侧8髋,右侧5髋;平均年龄53岁（45-65岁）;初次置换术后至翻修时间4年8个月-11年9个月（平均9年2个月）;骨缺损情况：髋臼和股骨缺损均按AAOS分类,髋臼缺损Ⅰ型6髋,Ⅱ型5髋,Ⅲ型2髋;股骨缺损Ⅰ型5髋,Ⅱ型4髋,Ⅲ型3髋,无明显缺损1髋。手术采用髋关节后外侧切口,髋臼侧用髋臼锉打磨修整,将异体骨粒植入骨缺损区,打压塑形;2髋安放加大的生物型髋臼假体,11髋安上钛网杯或加强臼杯,螺钉固定后行骨水泥固定臼假体。股骨侧,假体应长于原假体的长度;尽可能保存股骨结构,以颗粒骨填入髓腔以获得重建;如缺损严重采用1-3块异体骨块放置于缺损区,骨块应长于缺损区2-3cm。术后1周,3个月,6个月,12个月,以后每年一次摄X片观察假体的变化。结果本组13例13髋随访时间10-12.5年（平均11年5个月）。Harris评分由翻修前43分（41-47分）提高至87分（85-89分）。影像学,2髋股骨柄假体术后两年出现垂直移位,1髋10mm,另1髋20mm,以后没有继续发展,11年后假体仍然稳定,无松动;宿主骨与颗粒骨的骨整合血管化,术后6个月出现并不断进行至2年左右完成,但宿主骨与块状骨的整合血管化时间要在5年以上,有5例在术后8年仍可辩认出骨块;2例在术后10年,1例在术后12年仍可清晰地辩认出部份骨块,而其余骨块己完全整合血管化。结论在髋关节翻修术中,应用同种异体骨修复骨缺损,为假体提供可靠的、充分的支撑,已成为必要的技术手段。骨的改建过程,视乎个体的特性,宿主骨的保有量,植入骨的多少等条件而定,一般在术后1-2年,部份患者超过10年。     

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old

BACKGROUND: Acetabular bone deficiency can present a challenge during total hip arthroplasty, especially in young patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary and revision acetabular reconstruction with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup in young patients who had preexisting acetabular bone deficiency. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive acetabular reconstructions were performed in thirty-seven patients who were younger than fifty years old (average, 37.2 years old). The impaction bone-grafting technique was used for twenty-three primary and nineteen revision acetabular reconstructions. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-one hips) were available for review after a minimum duration of follow-up of fifteen years. Clinical and radiographic results were assessed, and survivorship analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Eight hips were revised at a mean of twelve years (range, three to twenty-one years) after a primary reconstruction (four hips) or revision reconstruction (four hips). The revision was performed because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in four hips and because of culture-proven septic loosening in two. Two additional cups (both in hips that had had a revision reconstruction) were revised, during revision of the femoral stem, because of wear (one hip) or because of persistent intraoperative instability (one hip). Twenty-eight hips (in twenty-five patients) had retention of the acetabular component for a minimum of fifteen years. The mean Harris hip score for that group was 89 points. Twenty-six of these twenty-eight hips had no or slight pain. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a twenty-year survival rate of 80% (95% confidence interval, 67% to 94%) with acetabular revision for any reason as the end point and of 91% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 100%) with acetabular revision because of aseptic loosening as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique that is associated with good long-term results in young patients with acetabular bone-stock defects.     

病灶清除植骨保留髋臼假体的翻修术治疗假体周围局灶性骨溶解

目的 探讨病灶清除植骨保留髋臼假体的翻修术治疗全髋关节置换(total hip arthroplasty,THA)术后稳定固定的髋臼假体周围局灶性骨溶解的疗效.方法 2006年3月至2009年3月,THA术后髋臼假体稳定固定的假体周围局灶性骨溶解患者23例(23髋),男13例,女10例;年龄39～54岁,平均46.6岁.23例均为非骨水泥髋臼.初次THA至诊断髋臼假体周围骨溶解的时间为4.6～7.4年,平均5.5年.术前HarTis髋关节评分74分.手术经腹股沟入路,行髂骨内板开窗,清除髋臼骨溶解病灶、同种异体颗粒骨植骨;经后外侧人路更换聚乙烯内衬、股骨头假体,保留髋臼假体.翻修术后1、3、6、12个月及之后每年随访1次,以髋关节Harris评分评价临床疗效,摄X线片、CT扫描观察植骨区愈合、新发骨溶解病灶及假体移位情况.结果 16例获得随访,随访时间8～38个月,平均28个月.末次随访时Harris髋关节评分86～100分,平均93.8分.16例植骨区成骨均良好,12例植骨区完全被周围骨爬行替代,髋臼假体固定好,无髋臼假体松动及移位,无新发髋臼假体周围骨溶解,无异位骨化、脱位、深静脉血栓形成及感染等并发症.结论 清除病灶植骨、保留髋臼假体、更换聚乙烯内衬和股骨头假体的翻修术可有效减少聚乙烯磨损颗粒产生,避免骨溶解病灶进展导致的假体松动,近期随访结果良好.     

同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨联合不同类型假体在严重髋臼骨缺损翻修中的应用

目的探讨对严重髋臼骨缺损患者采用同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨联合骨水泥型或非骨水泥型假体翻修的早中期疗效。方法回顾分析2011年2月-2018年5月采用同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨联合假体翻修治疗的42例(44髋)严重髋臼骨缺损患者临床资料,其中采用骨水泥型臼杯24例(24髋)、非骨水泥型臼杯18例(20髋)。男17例,女25例;年龄22~84岁,平均62.8岁。初次人工全髋关节置换术距该次翻修术时间为2.5~12.0年,平均8.3年。翻修原因:假体无菌性松动31例(32髋),假体周围感染11例(12髋)。按照髋臼骨缺损Paprosky分型标准:ⅢA型28例(29髋),ⅢB型14例(15髋)。术前髋关节Harris评分为(22.25±10.31)分。髋关节旋转中心高度为(3.67±0.63)cm,双下肢长度差值为(3.41±0.64)cm。结果手术时间为130~245 min,平均186 min。术中出血量600~2400 mL,平均840 mL。术后引流量250~1450 mL,平均556 mL。术后1例出现切口浅表感染,其余患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合。患者均获随访,随访时间6~87个月,平均48.6个月。末次随访时Harris评分为(85.85±9.31)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(t=18.563,P=0.000)。影像学复查显示同种异体骨与宿主骨逐步融合,未见明显骨吸收。末次随访时,髋关节旋转中心高度为(1.01±0.21)cm,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(t=17.549,P=0.000);双下肢长度差值为(0.62±0.51)cm,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(t=14.211,P=0.000)。与术前相比,末次随访骨水泥组、非骨水泥组Harris评分明显提高,髋关节旋转中心高度下降且均在Ranawat三角内,双下肢长度差值亦减小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组髋关节旋转中心高度比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.095,P=0.042),Harris评分及双下肢长度差值比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于PaproskyⅢ型髋臼骨缺损患者,根据缺损程度选择同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨联合骨水泥型或非骨水泥型假体翻修,均可有效重建髋关节,并获得较好的早中期疗效。