Subtle gastric abnormalities in a canine model: detection with low-dose imaging with storage phosphors and its equivalence to conventional radiography

The authors compared low-dose (32% of standard exposure) storage phosphor digital imaging (system resolution: 0.2-mm pixels, 10 bits) with isovoltage 75-kVp conventional radiography (standard exposure) in the detection of subtle simulated gastric abnormalities by using air contrast barium studies. Subtle simulated abnormalities (3-7-mm polyps, 4-15-mm ulcer craters, 4-11-mm-diameter edema, and 11-12-mm linear ulcers) were produced in resected canine stomachs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of 1,800 observations by six readers indicated that the digital images with and without high-frequency edge enhancement were equivalent to conventional radiographs (mean receiver operating characteristic areas [+/- standard deviation]: 0.76 +/- 0.06, 0.78 +/- 0.04, and 0.77 +/- 0.04, respectively). The accuracy of the diagnosis was equivalent for all three modalities. The following mean accuracies of negative and positive responses, respectively, for unenhanced digital, edge-enhanced digital, and conventional images were determined: 0.71 +/- 0.05 and 0.41 +/- 0.07, 0.71 +/- 0.04 and 0.51 +/- 0.09, and 0.68 +/- 0.04 and 0.43 +/- 0.05. It was concluded that low-dose storage phosphor air-contrast barium studies were equivalent to conventional radiography in the detection of subtle gastric abnormalities.     

Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices

OBJECTIVES: To compare the number of radiographs taken in general dental practices equipped with digital radiography vs conventional film-based radiography and to determine the reasons for any difference in numbers. METHODS: In a mail survey, 473 questionnaires were sent to Dutch General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) using digital radiography and 105 questionnaires were sent to GDPs using film. The questionnaire concerned the number of intraoral radiographs taken in the dental practice, as well as possible reasons to take more or fewer radiographs after conversion to digital radiography. RESULTS: The response rate was 73%. Users of a phosphor plate system on average take 42.8 radiographs per week and solid-state system users take 48.4 radiographs, whereas film users take on average only 32.5 radiographs per week. The need for more certainty about the planned or ongoing treatment as well as better diagnostics were the most important reasons for taking more radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that GDPs using a system for digital radiography are more inclined to take radiographs than dentists taking conventional radiographs. Although digital intraoral radiography requires 50-80% less radiation per exposure than film, it is likely that the effective dose reduction after converting from conventional to digital radiography is less than 25% owing to the greater numbers of radiographs taken.     

Prospective study of digital radiographs versus conventional screen films in Small Bowel Follow-Through examination

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare subjective radiological quality, radiation dose and effect on workflow using digital radiography (DR) vs. conventional screen film (SF) radiography in the Small Bowel Follow-Through (SBFT) examination. METHODS: Five attending and four resident radiologists compared hard-copy images from 11 SBFT examinations, for which every patient had a defined pair of SF and DR images taken 20-30min apart. SF and DR were performed with equivalent exposure data. Overall image quality, intestinal mucosa definition and bone visualization were graded on a 5-point scale, with 5 being the highest value. Thus, 11 patients had three criteria judged by nine observers in two modalities for a total of 594 observations of image quality. The radiation doses and effect on workflow were also compared. Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean scores on DR and SF for overall image quality, intestinal mucosa definition and bone visualization were 4.49 vs. 3.17, 4.38 vs. 3.4, and 4.5 vs. 2.4, respectively (p<0.001 in all cases). The average radiation dose with DR was 0.93+/-0.54 cGy, and -1.58+/-0.63 cGy with SF (p=0.016), reflecting a 41% dose reduction. Production of a DR image by technicians took 3.5+/-1.3min vs. 5.5+/-1.5min for SF (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Subjective image quality of hard-copy digital radiographs of the small bowel through examination is superior to images obtained with conventional radiographs, with an associated reduction of 41% in radiation dose and increased efficiency.     

"Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications

We studied the detectability of mineralized and non-mineralized simulated pulmonary nodules with dual energy digital radiography. "Soft tissue" and "bone" images (pixel size = 0.2 mm, 10 bits deep) were obtained with subtraction image processing after a single simultaneous exposure (100 kVp, 8 mAs, 17 mR skin exposure dose) of two storage phosphors with an interleaved 0.9 mm copper wafer. Three classes of paraffin-based nodules (0.5 to 3.0 cm) of varying mineral concentration (0, 120 and 190 mg/cm3 K2HPO4) were randomly positioned on the chest wall of two healthy volunteers to simulate calcified and non-calcified nodules. The average receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area of six readers (n = 2880 observations) showed that digital "bone" images (ROC area: 0.77 +/- 0.03) were significantly better (P less than 0.04) than conventional radiographs (OC Film, Lanex medium screens, 141 kVp, 19 mR skin exposure dose) (ROC area: 0.71 +/- 0.05) in detecting calcification in nodules. The unsubtracted digital images of lower kilovoltage were not superior to the 141 kVp conventional radiographs in a subgroup of two readers (ROC area: 0.73 +/- 0.02). Digital "soft tissue" images were equivalent to conventional chest radiographs in detecting soft tissue pulmonary nodules (ROC areas: 0.92 +/- 0.04 and 0.92 +/- 0.05, respectively.     

Metastatic calcification of the heart and lungs in end-stage renal disease: detection and quantification by dual-energy digital chest radiography

Metastatic calcification of the lung and heart can cause severe cardiopulmonary compromise and death. Although it is found in most end-stage renal disease patients at autopsy, it is only rarely detected during life. Using a prototype dual-energy digital chest radiographic unit, we measured calcium content (mg/cm2) over the lung and heart in 32 hemodialysis patients. Pulmonary calcium content was significantly greater in these patients than in sex-matched control subjects (men, 230 +/- 43 [mean +/- standard error] vs 166 +/- 7, p less than .05; women, 168 +/- 19 vs 110 +/- 7.5, p less than .001). Abnormal values were detected by dual-energy radiography in 44% of patients (vs 9% of patients studied by conventional radiography). Cardiac calcium content was also significantly greater in the hemodialysis patients than in the control subjects (259 +/- 14 vs 184 +/- 8, p less than .05). Metastatic calcification was significantly correlated with elevated phosphate and calcium-phosphate product levels. Patients with significantly elevated pulmonary calcium content had evidence of restrictive lung disease by functional testing. There was an inverse correlation between elevated cardiac calcium content and ejection fraction. We conclude that dual-energy digital radiography allows premortem diagnosis of metastatic visceral calcification and is more sensitive than current techniques.     

FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with that of conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy in patients suspected of having infection in their total hip replacements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with painful total hip replacements and possible septic prosthetic loosening were examined with FDG PET, conventional radiography, and three-phase bone scintigraphy. PET, radiographic, and scintigraphic images were each evaluated by two independent observers in a blinded fashion. For 32 of 35 patients, serial conventional radiographs were available. Results of microbiologic examinations of surgical specimens represented the standard of reference in 26 patients, and results of joint aspiration plus clinical follow-up of at least 6 months represented the standard of reference in the remaining nine patients. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver variability (kappa) values were calculated. The imaging modalities were compared in terms of diagnostic confidence by using the sign test. RESULTS: Nine patients had septic and 21 patients had aseptic loosening. In five patients, neither loosening nor infection was confirmed. For diagnosing infection with FDG PET, conventional radiography, and bone scintigraphy, respectively, sensitivity values for reader 1 and reader 2 were 33% and 22%, 89% and 78%, and 56% and 44%, while specificity values were 81% and 85%, 50% and 65%, and 88% and 92% and accuracy values were 69% for both readers, 60% and 69%, and 80% for both readers. PET was significantly more specific (P =.035) but less sensitive (P =.016) than conventional radiography for the diagnosis of infection. CONCLUSION: In a study population of patients suspected of having infected total hip replacements, FDG PET performed similarly to three-phase bone scintigraphy. FDG PET was more specific but less sensitive than conventional radiography for the diagnosis of infection.     

Detection of small bone lesions with digital radiography using storage phosphors

To date, the skeletal imaging capabilities of digital radiography with storage phosphors have been poorly investigated, and the diagnostic accuracy of this technique has not been thoroughly assessed. To evaluate the performance of storage phosphor digital radiography we compared 66 conventional and 66 digital radiographs of small abnormalities of the extremities (fractures, erosions, calcifications). Conventional images were obtained with a low-speed screen-film system while digital ones were acquired with high-resolution (5 lp/mm max) phosphors and laser-printed on a 8" x 10" film. Two experienced radiologists defined the gold standard (389 abnormalities) and four radiologists scored the findings (1,556 observations) on a five-point discrete scale. ROC analysis indicated film and storage radiography to be equally effective in the overall detection of abnormalities. No difference was found in the individual performances of the four readers, in the site subclasses (wrist, hand), and in the specific detection of fractures and erosions. Digital radiography proved to be superior to conventional radiography in the detection of calcifications in all sites and particularly in the wrist (p less than 0.05). Storage phosphor radiography may replace conventional radiography of the extremities without causing any significant decrease in diagnostic accuracy.     

Detection of thoracolumbar vertebral body destruction with lateral spine radiography. Part I: Investigation in cadavers

Despite few and inconclusive studies, radiography is generally believed to be insensitive for detection of osteolytic lesions of the spine. A more detailed investigation was undertaken to study the detectability of laboratory-produced osteolytic lesions in cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebral bodies using conventional lateral radiographs. The radiographs were presented to four radiologists in two sessions over a two month period. In the first session, the films were arranged in a composite of five vertebral bodies, T11 to L3 all from the same spine, in which one contained a lesion and the other four were normal. In the second session, each vertebral body film was presented individually. Area (Az) under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to measure the performances of readers. Observer detection was similar in the two formats with Az ranging from 0.67 +/- 0.05 to 0.79 +/- 0.04 for the composite film arrangement and 0.57 +/- 0.08 to 0.85 +/- 0.10 for the films of individual vertebral bodies. Lesions were grouped into three relative size categories: 18% to 25%, 26% to 40%, and 41% to 60% of transverse vertebral body diameter. The mean increase in ROC area between the small and large lesions was 0.29 (P less than 0.04) for the composite films and 0.16 (P less than 0.05) for the individual films. In the composite study, all readers showed significant (P less than 0.05) increases in lesion detection in spines reflecting large increases (P less than 0.01) in bone mineral content.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography

Fine linear structures represent a severe test of the minimum spatial resolution that is needed for digital chest imaging. We studied the comparative observer performance of storage phosphor digital imaging (1760 X 2140 pixel matrix, 10 bits deep), and conventional radiography (Lanex medium screen, Ortho C film) in the detection of simulated fine pulmonary lines superimposed on the normal chest when exposure factors were identical (20mR skin entrance dose at 141 kVp). Receiver operating characteristics analysis of 2160 observations by six readers found that high frequency edge-enhanced digital images (ROC area: 0.78 +/- 0.06) performed better than unenhanced digital images (ROC area: 0.70 +/- 0.07) (P less than 0.01 for paired t-test), and that edge enhanced digital images performed on a par with conventional radiography (ROC area: 0.78 +/- 0.09). We conclude that for the detection of fine linear structures, storage phosphor digital images can perform on a par with higher resolution conventional chest radiographs when a high frequency edge-enhancement algorithm is employed.     

Mediastinal abnormalities: detection with storage phosphor digital radiography

Conventional film radiography (FR) and six postprocessing algorithms of isodose storage phosphor digital radiography (SR) (0.2-mm X 10-bit pixel matrix) were compared in the evaluation of 40 mediastinal and 30 pulmonary lesions in 60 patients who underwent computed tomography of the chest. The six SR algorithms varied among each other in only one image parameter. One algorithm approximated conventional image characteristics. The other five algorithms were designed to optimize imaging of the mediastinum and tested the effects of gray-scale reversal, adjustment of optical density, a linear instead of a sigmoid gradation curve, and moderate edge enhancement of high and medium spatial frequencies. Performance was evaluated by calculating the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) of 5,040 observations by six readers. Post-processing with high-frequency edge enhancement and density optimization for the mediastinum significantly improved performance of SR over FR in the detection of mediastinal lesions (Az = .80 +/- .02 vs .73 +/- .01, respectively). Gray-scale reversal significantly decreased performance (Az = .64 +/- .03). All SR algorithms that were postprocessed to optimize imaging of the mediastinum were significantly inferior to FR in the detection of pulmonary lesions.     

Screening for tracheobronchial diseases with digital storage phosphor radiography]

Digital storage phosphor radiography (FCR: Fuji computed radiography) has a wide dynamic range and unique postprocessing capabilities. This study was designed to test whether chest imaging with FCR and its image processing would increase the accuracy of and confidence in the diagnosis of tracheobronchial abnormalities. In a phantom study, the performance of digital images having the appearance of a conventional chest radiograph was compared with that of a conventional system in detecting simulated tracheobronchial nodules. The digital images of lower kilovoltage (ROC area = 0.647 +/- 0.035) were equivalent to the conventional radiographs (ROC area = 0.620 +/- 0.028). On the other hand, nodule detectability was significantly improved in the digital images of higher kilovoltage (ROC area = 0.826 +/- 0.020). The author also compared the impact of five postprocessing algorithms (standard image, wide latitude image, enhanced image, reversed image, and subtraction image). ROC analysis indicated that the default standard image (ROC area = 0.826 +/- 0.020) was as good as an image with a linear rather than a sigmoid gradation curve (ROC area = 0.843 +/- 0.020), an image with strong enhancement of high frequencies (ROC area = 0.804 +/- 0.020), and an image with reversed gray scale polarity (ROC area = 0.775 +/- 0.015). Therefore these specific algorithms had no effect on the detection of tracheobronchial nodules. However, digital subtraction soft tissue images (ROC area = 0.961 +/- 0.030) were significantly better than the control images. Clinical study also indicated that subtraction images improve diagnostic accuracy in tracheobronchial diseases.     

A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications

The detectability of malignant tumor-derived microcalcifications with conventional mammography was compared to that with digital images (2000 X 2510 pixels by 10 bits) derived from a storage phosphor-based digital radiography system capable of 5 line pair/mm resolution at identical exposure factors (30 kVp, 250 mAs, 65 cm film-focus distance). Microcalcifications (50-800 microns in diameter) were randomly superimposed on a preserved human breast specimen. ROC analysis based on 480 observations made by four readers indicated that the ability to detect the calcifications with digital images (ROC area = 0.871 +/- 0.066) was equivalent to conventional mammography (ROC area = 0.866 +/- 0.075) despite lower spatial resolution. With digital mammography, 62% of all clusters were correctly localized, but only 23.6% of the individual calcifications were counted. With conventional mammography 61% of all clusters were correctly localized, but significantly more of the individual calcifications (31.5%) were counted.     

Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging

To investigate radiologists' performance at interpreting digital radiographic images, we compared the detectability of pneumothoraces on computed radiographic chest images with 0.2-mm pixel size (2.5 Ip/mm) with their detectability on matched conventional screen-film images (5 Ip/mm). Eight radiologists reviewed 50 computed and 50 screen-film chest radiographs from 25 patients with pneumothoraces and 25 patients with other (or no) abnormalities. Four of the readers who best detected pneumothoraces on screen-film examinations performed worse when interpreting computed radiographic studies; the other four readers detected pneumothoraces similarly with both techniques. No relationship was found between the size of a pneumothorax and its likelihood of detection by either technique. These results raise concerns about implementing computed radiography for comprehensive chest imaging.     

Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography

Objective

To compare the radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort, and financial break-even of a standard digital radiography and a biplanar low-dose X-ray system.

Materials and methods

A standard digital radiography system (Ysio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) was compared with a biplanar X-ray unit (EOS, EOS imaging, Paris, France) consisting of two X-ray tubes and slot-scanning detectors, arranged at an angle of 90° allowing simultaneous vertical biplanar linear scanning in the upright patient position. We compared data of standing full-length lower limb radiographs and whole spine radiographs of both X-ray systems.

Results

Dose–area product was significantly lower for radiographs of the biplanar X-ray system than for the standard digital radiography system (e.g. whole spine radiographs; standard digital radiography system: 392.2?±?231.7 cGy*cm² versus biplanar X-ray system: 158.4?±?103.8 cGy*cm²). The mean examination time was significantly shorter for biplanar radiographs compared with standard digital radiographs (e.g. whole spine radiographs: 449 s vs 248 s). Patients’ comfort regarding noise was significantly higher for the standard digital radiography system. The financial break-even point was 2,602 radiographs/year for the standard digital radiography system compared with 4,077 radiographs/year for the biplanar X-ray unit.

Conclusion

The biplanar X-ray unit reduces radiation exposure and increases subjective noise exposure to patients. The biplanar X-ray unit demands a higher number of examinations per year for the financial break-even point, despite the lower labour cost per examination due to the shorter examination time.     

Screening for asbestos-related pleural disease with digital storage phosphor radiography

Digital storage phosphor radiography (SR) has a wide dynamic range and unique postprocessing capabilities that may improve the performance of screening studies for asbestos-related pleural disease compared with conventional film radiography (FR). In a group of 32 asbestos-exposed and nine control subjects with established pleural data, we compared the screening performance of FR and SR obtained with a single isoexposure, dual-energy technique (system resolution 0.2 mm, 10 bits). Performance was evaluated for 7320 observations by eight readers using a paired t test (P less than .02 with Bonferroni correction) of averaged receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) areas (Az +/- standard error). We found that SR alone and SR supplemented by dual-energy soft-tissue and calcium images (SRde) were superior to FR in the overall detection of pleural abnormalities (Az = 0.90 +/- 0.01, 0.90 +/- 0.01, and 0.88 +/- 0.01, respectively). In the specific detection of pleural calcification, SRde was superior to FR (Az = 0.91 +/- 0.01 and 0.87 +/- 0.01, respectively; P less than 0.01). Analysis of variance indicated that SRde most closely reproduced an established pleural score based on the International Labor Organization (ILO) classification of the pneumoconioses (P less than 0.05, Scheffé's multiple comparison test). We conclude that isodose SR performs at least as well as FR in screening for asbestos-related pleural disease. SR supplemented by dual-energy images might improve the specific detection of pleural calcifications compared with FR.     

Photostimulable phosphor digital radiography of the extremities: diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional radiography

A direct comparison was made between digital and conventional radiographs to assess the relative accuracy of a photostimulable phosphor digital imaging system in detecting and localizing minor trauma in the extremities. Matched sets of images were obtained on 103 patients who came to the emergency department for radiographs of the hand, wrist, foot, or ankle. One set was obtained with a conventional screen/film system. The other set was obtained with photostimulable phosphor digital cassettes. The two sets of images of each patient were independently interpreted by three radiologists in a blinded fashion. The findings of each of these three readers were compared with the consensus opinion of two different radiologists. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for each of the three readers, areas under the curves were calculated, and true-positive fractions were determined at false-positive fractions of 0.1. Although no significant differences in the areas under the ROC curves for the two imaging systems were detected, conventional radiography showed a slight advantage. However, when true-positive fractions for fracture detection were compared at false-positive fractions of 0.1 a statistically significant difference was shown, with conventional screen/film radiography being more sensitive. This study raises questions about the use of currently available photostimulable phosphor systems for imaging trauma of the extremities and suggests that those systems should not be used exclusively.     

Image processing in digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic efficacy.

The usefulness of digital image processing of chest radiographs was evaluated in a clinical study. In 54 patients, chest radiographs in the posteroanterior projection were obtained by both 14 inch digital image intensifier equipment and the conventional screen-film technique. The digital radiographs (512 x 512 image format) viewed on a 625 line monitor were processed in three different ways: (1) standard display; (2) digital edge enhancement for the standard display; and (3) inverse intensity display. The radiographs were interpreted independently by three radiologists. The diagnoses were confirmed by CT, follow-up radiographs and clinical records. Chest abnormalities of the films analyzed included 21 primary lung tumors, 44 pulmonary nodules, 16 cases with mediastinal disease and 17 cases with pneumonia/atelectasis. Interstitial lung disease, pleural plaques, and pulmonary emphysema were found in 30, 18 and 19 cases, respectively. The sensitivity of conventional radiography when averaged overall findings was better than that of the digital techniques (P less than 0.001). The differences in diagnostic accuracy measured by sensitivity and specificity between the three digital display modes were small. Standard image display showed better sensitivity for pulmonary nodules (0.74 vs 0.66; P less than 0.05) but poorer specificity for pulmonary emphysema (0.85 vs. 0.93; P less than 0.05) compared with inverse intensity display. We conclude that when using 512 x 512 image format, the routine use of digital edge enhancement and tone reversal at digital chest radiographs is not warranted.     

Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare human observer performance in a contrast-detail test by using postprocessed hard-copy images from a digital chest radiography system and conventional screen-film radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The digital radiography system is based on a large-area flat-panel x-ray detector with a structured cesium iodide scintillator layer and an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor array for image readout. Images of a contrast-detail phantom were acquired at two exposure levels by using two standard thoracic screen-film systems and the digital system at matched dose. By using images of the phantom processed with standard chest image postprocessing techniques, a four-alternative forced-choice observer perception study was performed, and the number of detectable test signals (disk-shaped objects 0.3-4.0 mm in diameter) was determined for each image type. RESULTS: On average, observers detected more test signals on digital images than on screen-film radiographs at all diameters up to 2.0 mm and an equivalent number at larger diameters. Test signals with lower inherent subject contrast were detected more readily on digital images than on screen-film images, even when x-ray exposure levels for the digital system were reduced by 20%. CONCLUSION: Observer performance in a contrast-detail detection task can be improved by using images acquired with the flat-panel digital chest radiography system as compared with those acquired with state-of-the-art screen-film combinations.     

Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography

The potential for improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography (SER) was evaluated by means of observer performance testing during the interpretation of posteroanterior conventional radiographs and SER images of an anthropomorphic chest phantom with simulated nodules. A test set of 200 conventional and 200 SER radiographs of phantoms containing either one nodule or none was interpreted by four radiologists attempting to detect a nodule and indicate a confidence value. Their ability to detect nodules positioned over the lung was slightly improved with SER compared with conventional radiography (sensitivity, .56 vs .70); for nodules over the mediastinum or diaphragmatic areas, it was much improved (sensitivity, .29 vs .64). The results were also analyzed with receiver-operating characteristic methods, which revealed a significant improvement in lesion detect-ability over the thicker body parts with SER images. The capability of equalized chest radiographs to provide improved lesion detectability suggests that SER may set a new standard for film-based chest radiography and have a large clinical application.     

Segmentation of cardiac cine MR images of left and right ventricles: interactive semiautomated methods and manual contouring by two readers with different education and experience

PURPOSE: To test interactive semiautomated methods (ISAM) vs. manual contouring (MC) in segmenting cardiac cine MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Short-axis images of 10 consecutive patients (1.5-81.5 years of age) were evaluated by a trained radiologist (R1) and a low-trained engineer (R2). Each of them performed four independent reading sessions: two using ISAM and two using MC. Left ventricle (LV) myocardial mass (LVMM), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and right ventricle (RV) ejection fraction (RVEF) were obtained. Bland-Altman analysis and Wilcoxon test were used. RESULTS: The bias +/- 2 standard deviations (SD) of ISAM vs. MC for LVMM (g) was -5.7 +/- 13.4 (R1) and -5.5 +/- 26.3 (R2); for LVEF (%) it was -1.4 +/- 13.0 and -2.9 +/- and 6.8; for RVEF (%) it was 2.6 +/- 17.0 and 1.0 +/- 16.7. Considering both readers/methods, intraobserver bias +/- 2 SD ranged from 0.3 +/- 25.3 to -6.8 +/- 23.0, from 0.2 +/- 8.0 to -4.4 +/- 15.8, and from -0.0 +/- 26.4 to -4.6 +/- 27.8, respectively. Interobserver bias +/- 2 SD was -25.9 +/- 46.0 (ISAM) and 26.1 +/- 36.4 (MC), -1.4 +/- 8.6 (ISAM) and 0.1 +/- 17.9 (MC), and 0.7 +/- 23.3 and 2.3 +/- 29.8, respectively. Larger SDs were systematically found for RVEF vs. LVEF. Segmentation times: five minutes for LV with ISAM (both readers); for LV with MC, six (R1) vs. nine minutes (R2) (P < 0.001); five to six minutes for RV (both methods /readers). R2 significantly reduced LV segmentation times from nine (MC) to five minutes (ISAM) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A highly reproducible LV segmentation was performed in a short time by R1. The advantage of ISAM vs. MC for LV segmentation was a time saving only for R2. For RVEF, a lower reproducibility was observed for both methods and readers.