Pioglitazone: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Pioglitazone is an antihyperglycaemic agent that, in the presence of insulin resistance, increases hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and increasing peripheral and splanchnic glucose uptake. Pioglitazone is generally well tolerated, weight gain and oedema are the most common emergent adverse events, and there are no known drug interactions between pioglitazone and other drugs. In clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone as monotherapy, or in combination with metformin, repaglinide, insulin or a sulphonylurea, induced both long- and short-term improvements in glycaemic control and serum lipid profiles. Pioglitazone was also effective in reducing some measures of cardiovascular risk and arteriosclerosis. Pioglitazone thus offers an effective treatment option for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Rosiglitazone : a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Rosiglitazone (Avandia) is an antihyperglycaemic agent of the thiazolidinedione class that improves glycaemic control (as indicated by glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c] and fasting plasma glucose [FPG] levels) primarily by increasing hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, and in addition may help to preserve pancreatic beta-cell function. In general, rosiglitazone as monotherapy or in combination with other antihyperglycaemic agents, including metformin or sulfonylureas, improves glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and may slow disease progression associated with pancreatic beta-cell function decline. Rosiglitazone is generally well tolerated; however, additional long-term and comparative studies are required to further evaluate the effects of rosiglitazone on bone and the potential cardiovascular risk of the drug, including the risk relative to pioglitazone. Thus, in light of recent cardiovascular safety concerns and the need for further long-term data to clarify the potential risk of rosiglitazone in this regard, it would be prudent to use rosiglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes on a case-by-case basis, taking into account individual patient cardiovascular risk factors.     

Vildagliptin: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Vildagliptin (Galvus?, Jalra?, Xiliarx?) is an orally administered dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, vildagliptin 50?mg twice daily is indicated for use in combination with metformin or a thiazolidinedione, and vildagliptin 50?mg once daily is indicated for use in combination with a sulfonylurea. A fixed-dose combination of vildagliptin/metformin (Eucreas?, Icandra?, Zomarist?) is also available. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties. The efficacy of monotherapy or combination therapy with oral vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes has been examined in randomized, double-blind, multicentre trials. Monotherapy with vildagliptin 50?mg once or twice daily reduced glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to a significantly greater extent than placebo, according to the results of 12- to 52-week trials in patients with type 2 diabetes. In terms of the reduction from baseline in HbA(1c) seen in active comparator trials of 12-104 weeks' duration, the noninferiority of vildagliptin 50?mg twice daily was established versus acarbose or rosiglitazone, the noninferiority of vildagliptin 100?mg once daily (an off-label dosage) versus metformin was established in elderly patients and vildagliptin 50?mg twice daily was more effective than voglibose; however, the noninferiority of vildagliptin 50?mg twice daily versus metformin or gliclazide was not established in two other trials. Combination therapy with vildagliptin 50?mg twice daily plus metformin improved HbA(1c) to a significantly greater extent than monotherapy with metformin and/or vildagliptin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes whose disease was inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy or who were treatment naive, according to the results of 12- or 24-week trials. In addition, vildagliptin 50?mg twice daily plus metformin demonstrated noninferiority to pioglitazone plus metformin, glimepiride plus metformin or gliclazide plus metformin in terms of the change from baseline in HbA(1c) after 24 or 52 weeks' therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. The addition of vildagliptin 50?mg twice daily to pioglitazone or vildagliptin 50?mg once daily to glimepiride improved HbA(1c) to a significantly greater extent than a thiazolidinedione or glimepiride alone in patients with type 2 diabetes whose disease was inadequately controlled, according to the results of 24-week trials. Oral vildagliptin 50?mg once or twice daily was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes. In particular, vildagliptin was associated with a low risk of hypoglycaemia and was weight neutral. Increases in transaminase levels were sometimes observed with a vildagliptin dosage of 100?mg once daily in clinical trials, and liver function should be monitored in patients receiving vildagliptin. However, meta-analyses of clinical trial data suggested that vildagliptin 50?mg once or twice daily was not associated with an increased risk of hepatic adverse events, transaminase elevations ≥3?×?the upper limit of normal, pancreatitis, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, infections or skin-related toxicity. In conclusion, vildagliptin is an important option for use in combination with metformin, a sulfonylurea or a thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes who require combination therapy.     

Repaglinide: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Oral repaglinide (GlucoNorm?; NovoNorm?; Prandin?; Surepost?) is a rapid-acting insulin secretagogue that lowers postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions by targeting early-phase insulin release, with reductions in PPG considered to be important in reducing long-term cardiovascular complications of diabetes mellitus. Repaglinide, a carbamoylbenzoic acid derivative, is chemically related to the meglitinide class of insulin secretagogues, but unrelated to the sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues. Meglitinides, including repaglinide, have a distinct binding site at the β-cell membrane, which differs from that of sulfonylureas, and corresponds to greater insulinotropic effects with repaglinide than with glibenclamide and/or glimepiride and a more rapid onset of action in in vitro and in vivo studies. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral repaglinide in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and provides an overview of its pharmacological properties. In well designed clinical trials of up to 52 weeks' duration and in the clinical practice setting, recommended dosages of repaglinide (0.5-4?mg three times daily up to 30?minutes prior to a meal) provided effective glycaemic control and were generally well tolerated in treatment-naive or -experienced adult patients with type 2 diabetes, including elderly patients and those with renal impairment. Furthermore, as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antihyperglycaemic drugs, repaglinide was at least as effective as other oral antihyperglycaemic drugs at improving or maintaining glycaemic control, with a tolerability profile that was generally similar to that of sulfonylurea drugs and nateglinide. Thus, repaglinide remains an effective option for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Repaglinide (Prandin), NovoNorm, GlucoNorm, an oral insulin secretagogue, was the first meglitinide analogue to become available for use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The drug lowers postprandial glucose excursions by targeting early-phase insulin release, an effect thought to be important in reducing long-term cardiovascular complications of diabetes. Repaglinide provided similar overall glycaemic control to that achieved with glibenclamide (glyburide), as assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and fasting blood glucose levels, and was generally well tolerated in well designed clinical trials. Its rapid onset and relatively short duration of action allow for flexible meal schedules. Two modelled US cost-effectiveness analyses projected lifetime costs and outcomes for a hypothetical cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Both analyses projected long-term complications using data on HbA(1c) level changes from short-term clinical trials. Repaglinide plus rosiglitazone was dominant over rosiglitazone in one analysis, and repaglinide plus metformin was dominant over nateglinide plus metformin in the other. A similar Canadian analysis showed a favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (相似文献   

Repaglinide: a review of its therapeutic use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Repaglinide, a carbamoylmethyl benzoic acid derivative, is the first of a new class of oral antidiabetic agents designed to normalise postprandial glucose excursions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Like the sulphonylureas, repaglinide reduces blood glucose by stimulating insulin release from pancreatic beta-cells, but differs from these and other antidiabetic agents in its structure, binding profile, duration of action and mode of excretion. In clinical trials of up to 1-year's duration, repaglinide maintained or improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In comparative, 1-year, double-blind, randomised trials (n = 256 to 544), patients receiving repaglinide (0.5 to 4mg before 3 daily meals) achieved similar glycaemic control to that in patients receiving glibenclamide (glyburide) < or = 15 mg/day and greater control than patients receiving glipizide < or = 15 mg/day. Changes from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin and fasting blood glucose levels were similar between patients receiving repaglinide and glibenclamide in all studies; however, repaglinide was slightly better than glibenclamide in reducing postprandial blood glucose in I short term study (n = 192). Patients can vary their meal timetable with repaglinide: the glucose-lowering efficacy of repaglinide was similar for patients consuming 2, 3 or 4 meals a day. Repaglinide showed additive effects when used in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents including metformin, troglitazone, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, and intermediate-acting insulin (NPH) given at bedtime. In 1-year trials, the most common adverse events reported in repaglinide recipients (n = 1,228) were hypoglycaemia (16%), upper respiratory tract infection (10%), rhinitis (7%), bronchitis (6%) and headache (9%). The overall incidence of hypoglycaemia was similar to that recorded in patients receiving glibenclamide, glipizide or gliclazide (n = 597) [18%]; however, the incidence of serious hypoglycaemia appears to be slightly higher in sulphonylurea recipients. Unlike glibenclamide, the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients receiving repaglinide was not increased when a meal was missed in 1 trial. In conclusion, repaglinide is a useful addition to the other currently available treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Preprandial repaglinide has displayed antihyperglycaemic efficacy at least equal to that of various sulphonylureas and is associated with a reduced risk of serious hypoglycaemia. It is well tolerated in a wide range of patients, including the elderly, even if a meal is missed. Furthermore, glycaemic control is improved when repaglinide is used in combination with metformin. Thus, repaglinide should be considered for use in any patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose blood glucose cannot be controlled by diet or exercise alone, or as an adjunct in patients whose glucose levels are inadequately controlled on metformin alone.     

Exenatide once weekly in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction: Exenatide once weekly (EQW) is an injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that is pending approval at present by regulatory authorities for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its glucose-reducing and weight-loss properties, together with minimal hypoglycemia and a once-weekly dosing schedule, make it a potentially attractive treatment option for overweight type 2 diabetics.

Areas covered: A literature search using PubMed resulted in a search for all published clinical trials with EQW, entitled the DURATION trials, which are reviewed in this paper. Efficacy and safety data are compared with other available antidiabetes agents. Molecular structure, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and mechanism of action are also reviewed.

Expert opinion: EQW is a potentially attractive medication for overweight type 2 diabetics with efficacy in both glycemic control and weight loss, as well as minimal hypoglycemia. Owing to its route of administration and expected cost compared with generic metformin, it will probably have a role as add-on therapy rather than monotherapy. Additional studies are ongoing to compare its efficacy against liraglutide.     

Liraglutide: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Liraglutide (Victoza?) is a subcutaneously administered glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist produced by recombinant DNA technology and used as an adjunct to diet and exercise in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of liraglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes, and provides a summary of its pharmacological properties. Recently published pharmacoeconomic studies of liraglutide are also reviewed. Administered subcutaneously, liraglutide (usually 1.2 or 1.8?mg once daily) generally produced greater improvements in glycaemic control than active comparators or placebo when administered as monotherapy or in combination with one or two oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) to adults with type 2 diabetes in numerous randomized, controlled phase III trials. These included six trials in the LEAD trial programme that was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liraglutide across a continuum of antihyperglycaemic management for patients with type 2 diabetes. Liraglutide was generally well tolerated, with a low risk of hypoglycaemia evident, in the phase III trials. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal and included nausea and diarrhoea; most events were mild to moderate in severity and decreased in incidence over time. In conclusion, liraglutide has an important place in the management of adults with type 2 diabetes across a continuum of care. As well as providing effective glycaemic control, liraglutide improves pancreatic β-cell function and leads to bodyweight loss, thereby addressing some of the unmet needs of patients treated with traditional OADs.     

Alogliptin: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Alogliptin (Nesina?) is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor that is approved in Japan for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that is inadequately controlled by diet and exercise alone or by diet plus treatment with an α-glucosidase inhibitor. Alogliptin plus diet and exercise is also approved in Japan for use in combination with a thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes. In several large (n >250), double-blind, multinational trials of up to 26 weeks' duration, oral alogliptin as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antihyperglycaemic agents (metformin, glibenclamide or pioglitazone) or insulin therapy improved glycaemic control and was generally well tolerated in adult patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes, including elderly patients. Significant improvements in glycaemic control were evident from as early as 1 week in terms of improvements in mean fasting plasma glucose levels and from 4 weeks onwards for improvements in mean glycosylated haemoglobin levels. In general, the incidence of hypoglycaemia was similar to that seen in placebo groups and alogliptin treatment had neutral effects on bodyweight and lipid parameters. The long-term safety of alogliptin therapy remains to be established in clinical studies and with clinical experience. A planned clinical trial evaluating long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome and other planned or ongoing short-term trials will help to more definitively determine the position of alogliptin therapy in relation to other available antihyperglycaemic therapies. In the meantime, alogliptin is a promising new option for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, including elderly patients.     

Linagliptin: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Linagliptin (Trajenta?, Tradjenta?, Trazenta?, Trayenta?) is an oral, highly selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and is the first agent of its class to be eliminated predominantly via a nonrenal route. Linagliptin is indicated for once-daily use for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and a twice-daily fixed-dose combination of linagliptin/metformin (Jentadueto?) is also available. In this article, the pharmacological, clinical efficacy and tolerability data relevant to the use of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes are reviewed. The efficacy of oral linagliptin in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes has been investigated in several double-blind, multicentre trials. Following 12-24 weeks of treatment, improvements in glycaemic control parameters, including glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c); primary endpoint in all trials), were seen with linagliptin relative to placebo when used as monotherapy, initial combination therapy (with metformin or pioglitazone) or add-on therapy to other oral antihyperglycaemia agents (metformin and/or a sulfonylurea) or basal insulin (with or without metformin and/or pioglitazone). In terms of lowering HbA(1c), linagliptin was more effective than voglibose in a 26-week monotherapy trial and noninferior to glimepiride when used as add-on therapy to metformin in a 104-week study. Additional trials and subgroup analyses of pooled data suggest that linagliptin improves glycaemic control regardless of factors such as age, duration of type 2 diabetes, ethnicity and renal function, and as linagliptin is eliminated primarily via a nonrenal route, it can be used without dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment of any degree. Oral linagliptin was generally well tolerated and was associated with a low likelihood of hypoglycaemia (except when used in combination with a sulfonylurea) and had little effect on bodyweight. Further long-term and comparative efficacy and tolerability data are required to help position linagliptin more definitively with respect to other antihyperglycaemia agents. However, clinical data currently available indicate that linagliptin is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for use in patients with type 2 diabetes, including those with renal impairment for whom other antihyperglycaemia agents require dosage adjustment or are not suitable.     

Rosiglitazone: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Rosiglitazone, a thiazolidinedione with a different side chain from those of troglitazone and pioglitazone, reduces plasma glucose levels and glucose production and increases glucose clearance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin sensitivity, pancreatic beta-cell function and surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk factors are significantly improved by rosiglitazone. Double-blind trials of 8 to 26 weeks of rosiglitazone 4 or 8 mg/day monotherapy indicate significant decreases in fasting plasma glucose (-2 to -3 mmol/L with 8 mg/day) and glycosylated haemoglobin levels [HbA(1c); -0.6 to -0.7% (-0.8 to -1.1% in drug-naive patients) with 8 mg/day]. Significant decreases in hyperglycaemic markers occurred when rosiglitazone was combined with metformin (HbA(1c) -0.8 to -1.0%), a sulphonylurea (-1.4%) or insulin (-1.2%) for 26 weeks versus little change with active comparator monotherapy. Efficacy was maintained in trials of < or = 2 years, and was also apparent in various ethnic subgroups, elderly patients, and both obese and nonobese patients. Rosiglitazone is currently not indicated in combination with injected insulin. It should be administered in conjunction with diet and exercise regimens. Rosiglitazone is generally well tolerated. Despite rare individual reports of liver function abnormalities in rosiglitazone recipients, the incidence of these in clinical trials (< or = 2 years' duration) was similar to that in placebo and active comparator groups. Fluid retention associated with rosiglitazone may be the cause of the increased incidence of anaemia in clinical trials, and also means that patients should be monitored for signs of heart failure during therapy. Although bodyweight is increased overall with rosiglitazone therapy, increases are in subcutaneous, not visceral, fat; hepatic fat is decreased. The pharmacokinetic profile of rosiglitazone is not substantially altered by age or renal impairment, nor are there important drug interactions. Rosiglitazone is not indicated in patients with active liver disease or increased liver enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: Oral rosiglitazone 4 or 8 mg/day provides significant antihyperglycaemic efficacy and is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihyperglycaemic agents, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who do not have active liver disease. Long-term data are required before conclusions can be drawn about the clinical significance of positive changes to surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease risk and improvements to pancreatic beta-cell function. Rosiglitazone significantly improves insulin sensitivity and, as such, is a welcome addition to the treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Troglitazone: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Troglitazone is the first of a new group of oral antidiabetic drugs, the thiazolidinediones, and is indicated for the treatment of patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Troglitazone acts by enhancing the effects of insulin at peripheral target sites and, unlike the sulphonylurea drugs, is not associated with hypoglycaemia when administered as monotherapy. Clinical trials with troglitazone (usually 200 to 600 mg/day) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus consistently showed marked improvement in glycaemic control, as well as reductions in fasting serum insulin, C-peptide and triglyceride levels. Comparative studies with either glibenclamide (glyburide) or metformin indicated similar glycaemic control with troglitazone or these agents. Serum insulin levels were lower with troglitazone than with glibenclamide. Clinical trials of up to approximately 2 years' duration showed that glycaemic control is maintained with troglitazone on a long term basis. In general, troglitazone is well tolerated by the majority of patients. However, discontinuation of troglitazone because of elevated liver enzyme levels occurs in approximately 2% of patients receiving the drug, and frequent monitoring of liver enzymes is required (e.g. at least 11 times during the first year of therapy). Among patients who started troglitazone therapy in 1998 (after the incorporation of a boxed warning and increased monitoring requirements in the product labelling), the estimated risk of liver-related death is approximately 1 in 100,000. CONCLUSIONS: Troglitazone improves the ability of target cells to respond to insulin. The drug has been shown to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus when used as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin, and its efficacy is similar to that of glibenclamide or metformin. Although troglitazone is generally well tolerated, close monitoring of liver enzyme function is required to minimise the rare occurrence of serious hepatic dysfunction. Drug acquisition and liver function monitoring costs, as well as potential adverse effects, are important factors that may ultimately determine the precise place of troglitazone in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nevertheless, as the first member of a new class of oral antidiabetic agents, the thiazolidinediones, troglitazone offers an effective treatment option in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus through its action of improving insulin sensitivity.     

Vildagliptin: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Vildagliptin (Galvus) is an antihyperglycaemic agent that selectively inhibits the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) enzyme. Such inhibition prevents the degradation of the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). This results in improved glycaemic control as determined by glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, and, in addition, an enhancement of pancreatic alpha- and beta-cell function. Vildagliptin is indicated in the EU and elsewhere in the world for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in combination with metformin, a sulfonylurea or a thiazolidinedione in patients with inadequate glycaemic control following monotherapy. Vildagliptin is also available as a fixed-dose formulation with metformin (Eucreas).Oral vildagliptin in combination with metformin, a sulfonylurea or a thiazolidinedione improved glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and appeared to slow the progression of beta-cell degeneration in trials of 24-52 weeks' duration. In trials in patients with diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin, vildagliptin provided an additional reduction of HbA(1c) levels of 1.1% and was shown to be as effective as pioglitazone as add-on therapy in a noninferiority trial. Vildagliptin had a low risk of hypoglycaemia, was weight-neutral overall and was generally well tolerated. Further investigation is required to accurately position vildagliptin relative to other, well established antidiabetic agents. However, the addition of vildagliptin expands the range of treatment options available, and as such, offers further potential for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes that is inadequately controlled with monotherapy.     

Exenatide: a review of its use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (as an adjunct to metformin and/or a sulfonylurea)

Exenatide (Byetta) is a novel, synthetic, incretin mimetic, glucoregulatory peptide approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have inadequate glycaemic control despite receiving treatment with maximum tolerated doses of metformin and/or a sulfonylurea. In randomised, controlled, phase III trials and post hoc completer analyses in this patient population, the addition of subcutaneous exenatide twice daily significantly improved glycaemic control and was associated with progressive and significant bodyweight reduction from baseline for up to 2 years. The overall intensity of glycaemic control with exenatide was similar to that achieved with once-daily insulin glargine or twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart. Exenatide was generally well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and gastrointestinal in nature. The overall rate of hypoglycaemia was similar to rates observed with placebo (when administered with metformin) and insulin comparators (when administered with metformin and a sulfonylurea). The addition of exenatide to therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea provided significant improvements in treatment satisfaction and patients' health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). The drug was also cost effective compared with pioglitazone, glibenclamide (glyburide), insulin glargine (all in combination with metformin and/or a sulfonylurea) and metformin alone. Overall, adjunctive therapy with exenatide is a valuable therapeutic option in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring moderate improvements in glycaemic control despite treatment with metformin and/or a sulfonylurea.     

Miglitol: a review of its therapeutic potential in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Miglitol, the first pseudomonosaccharide alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, smooths postprandial peak plasma glucose levels and thus improves glycaemic control, which is reflected in a reduced glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level. This oral antihyperglycaemic agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Miglitol is generally well tolerated and, unlike the sulphonylurea agents, is not associated with bodyweight gain or hypoglycaemia when administered as monotherapy. The drug is systemically absorbed but is not metabolised and is rapidly excreted via the kidneys. Clinical trials with miglitol (usually 50 or 100 mg 3 times daily) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus consistently demonstrated a significant improvement in glycaemic control for periods of 6 to 12 months. There were also marked reductions in postprandial serum insulin levels, although miglitol generally had no effect on fasting insulin levels. In comparative studies miglitol had similar efficacy to acarbose, but at lower therapeutic doses (50 and 100 mg 3 times daily, respectively). In addition, although sulphonylurea agents provided superior reductions in HbA1c levels, miglitol provided similar or superior reductions in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels. In combination with other oral antidiabetic agents or insulin, miglitol improved glycaemic control in patients in whom metabolic control was suboptimal despite dietary and pharmacological intervention. Most adverse events associated with miglitol treatment involve disturbances of the gastrointestinal tract (most common effects are flatulence, abdominal pain and diarrhoea). These symptoms are usually dose dependent, mild to moderate in severity, occur at the onset of treatment, decline with time and resolve promptly on discontinuation of the drug or with dosage adjustment. As monotherapy, miglitol is not associated with hypoglycaemia, but concomitant use with other oral antidiabetic agents may necessitate dosage adjustment of the other agents. Miglitol had no significant effects on renal, cardiovascular, respiratory or haematological parameters in long term studies. No dosage adjustments are required in elderly patients, in those with hepatic impairment or in those with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. Conclusions: In long term, well designed trials miglitol reduces fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels, thus improving glycaemic control, which is reflected in a reduced HbA1c level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Most adverse events associated with miglitol involve disturbances of the gastrointestinal tract. This agent is a useful first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus insufficiently controlled by diet alone and as second-line or as adjuvant therapy in those insufficiently controlled with diet and sulphonylurea agents. Miglitol may prove particularly beneficial in elderly patients and those with hepatic impairment or mild to moderate renal impairment, in whom other oral antidiabetic agents are contraindicated or need to be used with caution.     

Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Insulin aspart, a rapid-acting human insulin analogue, provides more rapid absorption than regular human insulin after subcutaneous administration. In most randomised, nonblind clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, insulin aspart administered immediately before meals resulted in significantly lower mean glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c ) (HbA(1c)) levels than regular human insulin (usually administered 30 minutes before a meal). Insulin aspart also significantly improved postprandial glycaemic control compared with regular human insulin. The efficacy of insulin aspart was similar to that of insulin lispro when administered to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus via continuous subcutaneous infusion in a randomised, nonblind trial. Preliminary data from randomised, nonblind trials suggest insulin aspart had a trend towards lower HbA(1c) levels compared with regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biphasic insulin aspart [30% soluble (rapid-acting) and 70% protamine-bound insulin aspart (BIAsp30)] generally provided significantly better postprandial glucose control than a similar mixture of biphasic regular human insulin (BHI30) in a randomised, nonblind trial in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the long-term efficacy of BIAsp30 was similar to that of BHI30 after 2 years in a randomised, nonblind trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus reported greater treatment satisfaction with insulin aspart or BIAsp30 than with regular human insulin or BHI30. The overall incidence of hypoglycaemia with insulin aspart was lower than, or similar to, that of regular human insulin. Moreover, insulin aspart tended to be associated with a lower occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and severe hypoglycaemic events than regular human insulin. CONCLUSION: The standard preparation of insulin aspart has the potential to better mimic the physiological response to meals than regular human insulin. Insulin aspart when combined with a suitable basal insulin improved overall glycaemic control and led to a similar or lower number of hypoglycaemic episodes compared with a similar regular human insulin regimen. Insulin aspart was generally as effective and well tolerated as insulin lispro when administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion in a single comparative trial. The efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart has been documented in a small number of trials. Both insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart provide for flexible and convenient administration. Insulin aspart is now well established as an effective and convenient means of providing glycaemic control which offers clinical and practical advantages over regular human insulin.     

Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus

Insulin aspart (NovoRapid, NovoLog) is a short-acting insulin analogue, which has a faster onset and shorter duration of action than regular human insulin. Insulin aspart administered immediately before meals provided significantly greater improvements in glycosylated haemoglobin and better postprandial glycaemic control than regular human insulin administered 30 minutes before meals, when used in a basal-bolus regimen with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, in randomised, nonblind studies in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin aspart provided similar glycaemic control to regular human insulin, administered in a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin. Small studies suggest that the use of insulin aspart in combination with oral hypoglycaemic agents may be beneficial. Insulin aspart, administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) provided better glycaemic control than insulin aspart multiple daily injection regimens in patients with type 1 (but not type 2) diabetes, and had similar efficacy to CSII with insulin lispro or regular human insulin in type 1 diabetes. Limited studies show insulin aspart to be effective in children, adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Insulin aspart had a tolerability profile similar to that of regular human insulin in clinical trials. The incidence of major or nocturnal hypoglycaemic events reported in patients receiving insulin aspart was lower than that of regular human insulin in several studies.In conclusion, insulin aspart, administered immediately before meals in a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin, provided better long-term glycaemic control than regular human insulin administered 30 minutes before meals in patients with type 1 diabetes, and was as effective as regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. A significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia was seen in several trials. Insulin aspart CSII provided better glycaemic control than insulin aspart multiple daily subcutaneous injection (MDI) in patients with type 1 (but not type 2) diabetes and had similar efficacy to CSII with insulin lispro or regular human insulin in type 1 diabetes. Insulin aspart is an effective and well tolerated alternative to regular human insulin and insulin lispro for the maintenance of glycaemic control in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes.     

Insulin detemir: a review of its use in the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Insulin detemir (Levemir) is a soluble long-acting human insulin analogue acylated with a 14-carbon fatty acid. The fatty acid modification allows insulin detemir to reversibly bind to albumin, thereby providing slow absorption and a prolonged and consistent metabolic effect of up to 24 hours in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin detemir has a more predictable, protracted and consistent effect on blood glucose than neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, with less intrapatient variability in glycaemic control, compared with NPH insulin or insulin glargine. Insulin detemir, administered once or twice daily, is at least as effective as NPH insulin in maintaining overall glycaemic control, with a similar or lower risk of hypoglycaemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycaemia, compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Insulin detemir also provides the added clinical benefit of no appreciable bodyweight gain in patients with type 1 diabetes and less bodyweight gain than NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Insulin detemir is, therefore, a promising new option for basal insulin therapy in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes.     

Fenofibrate: a review of its use in primary dyslipidaemia, the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative indicated for use in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia, mixed dyslipidaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia in adults who have not responded to nonpharmacological measures. Its lipid-modifying effects are mediated by activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. Fenofibrate also has nonlipid (i.e. pleiotropic) effects (e.g. it reduces fibrinogen, C-reactive protein and uric acid levels and improves flow-mediated dilatation). Fenofibrate improves lipid levels (in particular triglyceride [TG] and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C] levels) in patients with primary dyslipidaemia. Its lipid-lowering profile means that fenofibrate is particularly well suited for use in atherogenic dyslipidaemia (characterised by high TG levels, low HDL-C levels and small, dense low-density lipoprotein [LDL] particles), which is commonly seen in patients with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indeed, fenofibrate improves the components of atherogenic dyslipidaemia in patients with these conditions, including a shift from small, dense LDL particles to larger, more buoyant LDL particles. Greater improvements in lipid levels are seen when fenofibrate is administered in combination with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) or in combination with ezetimibe, compared with monotherapy with these agents. In the DAIS study, fenofibrate significantly slowed the angiographic progression of focal coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. In terms of clinical outcomes, although no significant reduction in the risk of coronary events was seen with fenofibrate in the FIELD trial in patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment was associated with a significantly reduced risk of total cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, primarily through the prevention of non-fatal myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation. Subgroup analyses revealed significant reductions in total CVD events and coronary heart disease events in patients with no previous CVD, suggesting a potential role for primary prevention with fenofibrate in patients with early type 2 diabetes. Improvements were also seen in microvascular outcomes with fenofibrate in the FIELD trial. Fenofibrate is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and when administered in combination with a statin. Combination therapy with fenofibrate plus a statin appears to be associated with a low risk of rhabdomyolysis; no cases of rhabdomyolysis were reported in patients receiving such therapy in the FIELD trial. Thus, fenofibrate is a valuable lipid-lowering agent, particularly in patients with atherogenic dyslipidaemia.