准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术后的再治疗

目的 评价准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术（ｐｈｏｔｏｒｅｆｒａｃｔｉｖｅ ｋｅｒａｔｅｃｔｏｍｙ,ＰＲＫ）术后因屈光回退,欠矫出现的残留近视及严重角膜上皮下雾状混沌（ｈａｚｅ）而再次手术治疗的疗效及安全性。方法 采用准分子激光仪对－１．００～－１６．５０Ｄ的近视眼及近视散光患者进行治疗。ＰＲＫ术后３５例（５１只眼）患者出现残留近视及严重ｈａｚｅ。结合ＰＲＫ手术及准分子激光治疗性角膜切削术（ｐｈｏｔｏｐ     

准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术矫治高度近视准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术后屈光回退的临床观察

目的评价准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术（LASIK）矫治高度近视准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术（PRK）后屈光回退的疗效。方法回顾性临床研究。对PRK术后2年以上、屈光回退且屈光度稳定的患者8例14眼行LASIK,对LASIK术后术眼进行评价。患眼PRK术前屈光度为-6.25～-12.50 D,PRK术后屈光度为-1.50～-6.25 D。随访观察LASIK矫正1年后术眼的裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力、屈光度、上皮下雾状混浊（haze）形成和角膜厚度的变化。结果所有患眼术后主观症状较轻。LASIK术后1年平均球镜度数为（-0.62±0.94）D。LASIK术后0.5≤裸眼视力〈0.8者4眼,≥0.8者9眼,1眼（7.1%）最佳矫正视力下降2行。4眼术后出现不同程度的haze,包括2级haze 3眼、3级haze 1眼。应用氟米龙滴眼液1个月后,haze及屈光回退减轻;术后1年,1级haze 2眼,2级haze 2眼,3级haze 1眼。LASIK术前角膜厚度为（467±38）μm,术后为（422±21）μm。结论高度近视PRK术后屈光回退行LASIK矫治是一种可行的方法,但少数患者术后可出现haze,仍需治疗。     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual myopia after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopic regression and undercorrection after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: The Eye Institute, Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Fifty eyes of 32 patients were treated by LASIK for residual myopia following primary PRK. The mean spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was -2.92 diopters (D) +/- 1.57 (SD) (range -0.75 to -7.88 D). The mean refractive cylinder was 0.96 +/- 0.74 D (range 0 to 3.50 D). For analysis, the eyes were divided into 2 groups: those with 0 or low corneal haze (Group 1) and those with severe corneal haze (Group 2). In Group 1, the SEQ was -1.99 +/- 0.79 D (range -0.75 to -3.75 D) and in Group 2, -3.77 +/- 1.62 D (range -0.75 to -7.90 D). The procedure was performed using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Summit Apex Plus laser. The mean interval between PRK and LASIK was 25 months (range 9 to 59 months). The following parameters were studied before and after LASIK retreatment: SEQ, mean refractive cylinder, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Complications after LASIK retreatment were evaluated. RESULTS: Six months after LASIK, the mean SEQ in all eyes was -0.65 +/- 0.86 D (range +1.50 to -3.35 D); 70.0% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and the UCVA was 6/12 or better in 72.5%. The mean SEQ in Group 1 was -0.22 +/- 0.55 D (range -0.88 to -1.50 D) and in Group 2, -0.97+/- 0.92 D (range 0.12 to -3.25 D); the UCVA was 6/12 or better in 94.0% of eyes in Group 1 and in 56.0% in Group 2. No statistically significant between-group difference was found in lines of Snellen acuity lost or gained at 6 months. No eye lost more than 1 line of BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis appears to be a safe, effective, and predictable procedure for treating eyes with 0 or low haze with residual myopia after PRK. It is less predictable in eyes with severe haze.     

Prophylactic mitomycin C to inhibit corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy for residual myopia following radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% in inhibiting haze formation after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for residual myopia following radial keratotomy (RK). METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized, noncomparative interventional case series was conducted of 22 eyes (14 patients) with residual myopia after RK performed at a single institution. All eyes were treated with PRK and a single intraoperative topical application of MMC 0.02% solution for 2 minutes using a soaked cellulose sponge placed over the ablated area. Refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and slit-lamp evidence of cotneal opacity (haze) were evaluated over 12 months. RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively, 3 eyes showed grade 1 haze, and 2 eyes showed grade 0.5 haze. Twelve months postoperatively, 2 (9%) eyes had UCVA > or = 20/20. No eye before and 17 (77%) eyes after treatment had UCVA > or = 20/40, and no eye before and 9 eyes (40.9%) after treatment had UCVA > or = 20/25. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was > or = 20/40 in all (100%) eyes and 21 (95%) eyes before and after treatment, respectively, and > or = 20/25 in 12 (54.5%) eyes before and after treatment. One (4.5%) eye lost 1 line of BSCVA. Mean spherical equivalent refraction achieved was -0.18 diopters (D) (range: -0.75 to +0.50 D) compared to -2.72 D (range: -1.50 to -4.00 D) before treatment. Twelve months after treatment, 19 (85.5%) eyes had a refractive outcome within +/- 0.50 D. CONCLUSIONS: A single intraoperative application of MMC 0.02% for 2 minutes appears to be effective in preventing subepithelial haze after PRK for residual myopia in patients with undercorrection or regression following RK.     

Eight-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

PURPOSE: We evaluated 8-year results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia in terms of stability and late complications. METHODS: Ninety-two myopic eyes of 55 patients were treated with a single-step method using an Aesculap-Meditec MEL 60 excimer laser with a 5.0-mm ablation zone. Treated eyes were divided into three groups according to preoperative refraction: low myopes (< or = -6.00 D), medium myopes (-6.10 to -10.00 D), and high myopes (>-10.00 D). RESULTS: Change in myopic regression stabilized in all myopia groups within 12 months, although a small myopic shift occurred up to 8 years after PRK. Mean change in refraction between 2 and 8 years was -0.42 +/- 0.48 D for low myopes, -0.37 +/- 0.34 D for medium myopes, and -0.41 +/- 0.50 D for high myopes. The percentage of eyes within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia 8 years after PRK was 78.3% in the low myopia group, 68.8% in the medium myopia group, and 57.1% in the high myopia group. One eye lost 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to irregular astigmatism. In 13.0% of eyes, a residual trace corneal haze was observed, which had no effect on visual acuity. Apart from the loss of 2 lines of BSCVA in one eye, there were no other late complications during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The mean change in refraction between 2 and 8 years was less than -0.50 D, regardless of preoperative refraction, and may be attributed to natural age-related refractive change. The appearance of residual corneal haze after 8 years correlated with the amount of myopic correction. PRK was a safe and stable surgical procedure in this group of patients.     

Retreatment after PRK for low and medium myopia. Results and study of contrast sensitivity

PURPOSE: To examine the results of retreatment with eximer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on refraction, visual acuity, haze, and contrast sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy was performed in 18 patients, once for one eye and twice for the other eye due to undercorrection or regression. Outcome was compared between the two eyes. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity was above 20/40 in 94.4% of the retreated eyes. There was no statistical difference between the two eyes for haze and contrast sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Retreatment with laser photorefractive keratectomy is a safe procedure and should be performed when regression or undercorrection occurs after the first laser excimer treatment.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement after photorefractive keratectomy

OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting residual myopia after primary photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: A retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Thirty-six consecutive eyes of 30 patients underwent LASIK after primary PRK. A Multiscan Schwind excimer laser was used for LASIK enhancement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, refraction, videokeratography, and complications were determined before and after LASIK retreatment. Follow-up was at least 12 months. RESULTS: Before LASIK, 11.11% of eyes showed a UCVA of 20/40 or better. This increased to 94.44% 12 months after LASIK. A UCVA of 20/25 or better was achieved in 0% before and in 72.22% after retreatment. Refraction +/-0.5 diopters (spherical equivalent) represented 0% of eyes before and 77.78% of eyes after enhancement. Before LASIK, two eyes had significant haze. Haze remained in these two eyes and appeared in another eye. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis proved to be safe and effective for treating residual myopia after PRK. Care must be taken when considering LASIK retreatment in patients with significant haze after primary PRK.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for residual myopia after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correcting residual myopia and myopic astigmatism after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. SETTING: Refractive Surgery and Cornea Unit, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: Thirty consecutive eyes (30 patients) had PRK for residual myopia after cataract surgery. Surface PRK with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser was used in all patients. Follow-up was 1 year. RESULTS: Before PRK, no eye had an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better. Twelve months after PRK, 16 eyes (53.33%) had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. After PRK, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved 1 line or more in 14 eyes (46.66%) over the preoperative values, and 15 eyes (50.00%) had the same BCVA as before PRK. Mean pre-PRK refraction of -5.00 diopters (D) +/- 2.50 (SD) decreased significantly to -0.25 +/- 0.50 D at 12 months (P < .001). At 12 months, the spherical equivalent was within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia in 27 eyes (90.00%). No vision-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Photorefractive keratectomy was an effective, predictable, and safe procedure for correcting residual myopia and myopic astigmatism after cataract surgery.     

Apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar after retreatment in hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To report a complication, apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar, that can occur after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) retreatment. SETTING: Istanbul University Eye Research Center, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: Twelve eyes of 6 patients with apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar were retrospectively studied. Mean age of the 5 men and 1 woman was 30.2 years +/- 5.4 (SD). All eyes had hyperopic PRK retreatment for regression 9.5 +/- 1.44 months after primary hyperopic PRK. Mean spherical equivalent refraction of the residual hyperopia before retreatment was +4.67 +/- 0.81 diopters (D). All patients had a corneal haze grade of less than 1+. Hyperopic PRK retreatment was performed with a 193 nm excimer laser (Chiron Technolas Keracor 116). RESULTS: Apical nodular subepithelial corneal scars developed within the first month of hyperopic PRK retreatment and progressed until the third month in 12 eyes of 6 patients. The lesion was round and symmetrical in both eyes, smaller than 2.0 mm, and centrally located. During the mean 40.66 +/- 2.46 month follow-up, the lesion did not change in size or density. Mean spherical equivalent refraction after retreatment was 2.88 +/- 0.88 D (range +1.50 to +4.00 D) at 1 month and +4.36 +/- 1.83 D at last follow-up. Refraction was unmeasurable in 3 eyes. Five eyes lost 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and 7 eyes, 2 or more lines. The surface regularity indexes were higher than 2.00 in all the eyes. CONCLUSION: Hyperopic PRK retreatment may cause the sight-threatening complication of apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar. This complication behaves unlike corneal haze and does not resolve spontaneously over time.     

Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment after LASIK

PURPOSE: To study the results of late photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in corneas originally subjected to LASIK. METHODS: Seven eyes of seven patients who had LASIK for myopia were retreated with PRK at least 2 years after LASIK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, and haze were evaluated before and after LASIK and after retreatment by PRK. RESULTS: Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment improved BSCVA in six (86%) of seven eyes, and one (14%) eye showed no changes. None of the eyes lost lines of BSCVA. Five of seven eyes developed mild haze, which disappeared before the last postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment performed at least 2 years after LASIK can improve visual acuity. We hypothesize that LASIK-induced corneal nerve damage disturbs corneal wound healing by increasing the tendency for development of haze.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for residual myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment on eyes with residual myopia with or without astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK retreatment was performed on 35 eyes of 23 patients for correction of residual myopia, with or without astigmatism, with a mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -2.17+/-0.82 D (range, -1.00 to -3.87 D) and mean refractive astigmatism of -0.55+/-0.61 D (range, 0 to -1.75 D). Retreatment was performed 3 to 18 months after primary LASIK (mean, 5.1+/-2.6 mo). The corneal flap of the previous LASIK was lifted and laser ablation was performed using the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. Follow-up was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: At 1 year after retreatment, manifest spherical equivalent refraction was reduced to a mean -0.23+/-0.28 D (range, 0 to -0.87 D), and refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean -0.16+/-0.25 D (range, 0 to -0.75 D). Thirty-two eyes (91.5%) had a manifest spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia, and 33 eyes (94.3%) had 0 to 0.50 D of refractive astigmatism. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 11 eyes (31.4%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye after retreatment. There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK retreatment was effective for correction of residual myopia or astigmatism after primary LASIK. Refractive results were predictable with good stability after 3 months. Lifting the flap during LASIK retreatment was relatively easy to perform and did not result in visual morbidity in eyes treated from 3 up to 18 months after primary LASIK.     

Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of superficial laser ablation on the flap as a treatment for residual ametropia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Private practice refractive surgery center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 18 eyes of 15 patients who had alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment for residual ametropia after LASIK. All patients who had retreatment on the flap between June 2004 and June 2005 were included in the study. Retreatments were performed by wavefront-guided excimer laser surface ablation using the Visx Star S4 laser. Outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), subjective refraction, and biomicroscopy at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative visits. RESULTS: The preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.63 diopter (D) +/- 0.87 (SD) (range -2.00 to +1.38 D). The mean amount of ablated cornea was 21.3 +/- 7.4 microm. At 3 months, the mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 1.5 lines (range 0.40 to 1.25), yielding an efficacy index of 0.87. At 6 months, the mean UCVA increased to 0.98 +/- 0.8 line (range 0.63 to 1.25) and the efficacy index, to 1.03. At 12 months, 6 eyes were lost to follow-up. The mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 2.2 lines (range 0.20 to 1.25), with an efficacy index of 0.87. The mean BSCVA was 0.98 +/- 0.9 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 3 months and 1.05 +/- 0.6 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 6 months, yielding a safety index of 1.03 and 1.11, respectively. At 12 months, the mean BSCVA was 0.95 +/- 1.0 line (range 0.63 to 1.25), with a safety index of 1.0. At 6 months, no eye had lost lines of BSCVA, 11 eyes had no change, and 7 eyes gained 1 line. At 12 months, 2 eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA, 8 eyes had no change, and 2 eyes gained 1 line. The mean SE refraction was +0.10 +/- 0.27 D (range -0.25 to +0.63 D) at 3 months, +0.06 +/- 0.37 D (range -0.50 to +1.13 D) at 6 months, and +0.15 +/- 0.39 D (range -0.50 to +0.88 D) at 12 months. On biomicroscopic examination, 1 eye had prolonged grade 1 haze that disappeared before 6 months. Two eyes of 1 patient who had hyperopic retreatment developed late-onset haze 8 months postoperatively. Eyes with microstriae in the flap before retreatment showed significant improvement after retreatment. There were no sight-threatening complications. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided LASEK or alcohol-assisted PRK retreatment on the surface of a LASIK flap was safe and effective in correcting small amounts of residual myopia.     

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后屈光度数欠矫及回退再手术探讨

目的　探讨再次手术治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术 (laserinsitukeratomileusis,LASIK)后屈光度数欠矫和回退的疗效。方法　将 1996年 3月至 1999年 7月在我院近视激光治疗中心行再次LASIK(re LASIK ,RLASIK)矫治残余近视度数患者 6 3例 (88只眼 ) ,按首次LASIK(firstLASIK ,FLASIK)术前等值球镜屈光度数分为Ⅰ组 4 1只眼 (≤ 10 0 0D)和Ⅱ组 4 7只眼 (>10 0 0D) ,分析导致再手术的因素 ;观察RLASIK术后屈光度数、裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力及手术并发症情况 ,统计术后屈光度数 <± 1 0 0D的发生率。术后随访时间 >1年。结果　在行RLASIK者中 ,FLASIK术前屈光度数>10 0 0D者超过 5 0 0 % ,同时行散光矫正术者占 73 9%。RLASIK术后Ⅰ组无屈光度数欠矫和回退现象 ,Ⅱ组存在屈光度数欠矫现象。RLASIK术后 1年 ,屈光度数 <± 1 0 0D者Ⅰ组为 6 8 3% ,Ⅱ组为5 1 1% ;全部病例RLASIK术后不同时间裸眼视力≥ 0 5者均超过 90 0 % ,最佳矫正视力较RLASIK术前下降 >2行者 8只眼 (9 0 % )。RLASIK术后Ⅱ组 3只眼 (3 4 % )发生圆锥角膜。结论　导致LASIK术后再手术的危险因素为高度近视、合并散光、个体反应差别。对于FLASIK术前屈光度数≤ 10 0 0D者 ,RLASIK的安全性、有效性、预测性及准确性均较为理想 ;对于F     

LASIK in myopic patients with dermatological keloids

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive out come of LASIK in myopic patients with a known history of dermatological keloid scar. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 10 eyes of 5 white patients with a known history of dermatological keloids. All patients had low to moderate myopia with no corneal or limbal keloid. All underwent uneventful bilateral LASIK. Postoperatively, visual outcomes, refractive outcomes, and complications were evaluated. Minimum 1-year follow-up was indicated for all patients in this study. RESULTS: Mean preoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/320 and 1 year postoperative 20/20. Mean preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 20/25 and 1 year postoperative was 20/20. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -5.00 +/- 2.6 diopters (D) and +0.1 +/- 0.2 D 1 year postoperative. The safety index was 1.02 and the efficacy index was 1.02. None of the included in this study underwent retreatment for correction of residual error or regression up to 1 year postoperatively. No sight-threatening complications were reported. No patient reported postoperative haze, severe dry eye syndrome, or flap-related problems. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK is a safe, effective, and predictable technique for correcting low and moderate myopia in patients with dermatological keloids.     

Comparison of two procedures: photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE: A prospective study was conducted to compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of low to moderate myopia. METHODS: Forty-five patients with a manifest refraction (PRK, -4.54 +/- 0.80; LASIK, -4.82 +/- 1.10) from -1.50 to -6.00 diopters (D) were treated and followed-up for 6 months. In each case, 1 eye received PRK and the other LASIK. The first eye treated, and the surgical method used in the first eye, were randomized. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal haze, and topographic analysis of ablation decentration were examined. RESULTS: The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 35 PRK eyes (77.8%) and 28 LASIK eyes (62.2%) at 6 months (P =.107). At 6 months, 28 eyes (62.2%) that received PRK showed a spherical equivalent of within +/-0.5 D as compared with 24 eyes (53.4%) that received LASIK (P =.393). The amount of ablation decentration was 0.37 +/- 0.25 mm in PRK eyes and 0.49 +/- 0.38 mm in LASIK eyes at 3 months (P =.36). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, PRK and LASIK were found to be similarly effective and predictive of correction in low to moderate myopia. PRK has the advantage of less ablation decentration and is safer than LASIK, so we recommend PRK for eyes with low to moderate myopia.     

Five-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

PURPOSE: To analyze long-term results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective study included 15 eyes of 8 patients who were examined annually for 5 years after PRK. The Nidek EC-5000 laser with an ablation zone of 5.0 mm was used. Evaluations included spherical equivalent manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal haze, and corneal astigmatism calculated by Fourier analysis of videokeratography data. RESULTS: A tendency toward myopic regression was most evident within the first postoperative year, with manifest refraction changing from +0.80 +/- 1.62 D at 1 week to -0.45 +/- 0.70 D at 1 year postoperatively (P = .007). Regression continued after the second postoperative year. There was a statistically significant difference between manifest refraction at 2 years (-0.36 +/- 0.75 D) and 5 years (-1.11 +/- 1.12 D) (P = .002). Postoperative UCVA stabilized from 3 months up to 3 years, but slightly deteriorated at 4 years and thereafter due to the myopic refractive shift. BSCVA remained stable throughout the 5-year follow-up period. Several eyes developed mild corneal haze after surgery, but haze was minimal in the majority of patients by 1 year and continued to fade over time. The asymmetry component of the cornea significantly increased after surgery, with all postoperative values significantly higher than before PRK (P < .05). Higher order irregularity increased after surgery, with a statistically significant difference between preoperative and 1 year postoperative (P < .05), but values after 2 years were not different from preoperative baseline. CONCLUSION: Fifteen eyes with a baseline refraction of -3.00 to -9.00 D had PRK with the Nidek EC-5000 laser and a 5-mm-diameter ablation zone. Myopic regression occurred in the first year, with continued mild regression of approximately -0.75 D between 2 and 5 years. Nevertheless, the results show the procedure was relatively safe and effective in this group.     

Evaluation of photorefractive keratectomy retreatments after regressed myopic laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancements in eyes previously treated by myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) showing an undercorrection due to either a refractive regression or a primary undercorrection, when an in-the-bed enhancement was not advisable because of residual stromal thickness limitations. DESIGN: Noncomparative, prospective, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen eyes of 17 patients previously treated by LASIK for a spherical equivalent (SE) correction of -8.125 to -12.50 diopters (D; mean, -9.45 +/- 1.01 D), that after a follow-up of 6 to 14 months ended up with a refraction of -1.50 to -3.75 D (SE; mean, -2.48 +/- 0.74 D). Intended flap thickness was 160 microm for all eyes. In all cases, the residual stromal bed under the flap was considered too thin (255-305 microm) to allow an in-the-bed enhancement without exceeding an assumed safety thickness limit (250 microm). INTERVENTION: Eyes were treated by PRK at least 6 months after LASIK. The PRK ablation parameters (diameter, attempted correction) were selected to avoid theoretical flap perforation. The deepest ablation was 60 microm, for a -3.75-D correction. We used a Bausch & Lomb 217 C excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Refraction, uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp evidence of corneal opacity or other visible complications, and corneal topography. RESULTS: Although the initial postoperative period was characterized by very satisfactory refractive results (mean SE error at 1 month, -0.04 +/- 0.37 D; range, +0.75 to -0.625 D), during follow-up, a dense haze (grade 3 and 4) developed in 14 eyes (82.3%) that induced a further myopic regression (SE, -1.725 to -5.50 D; mean, -3.11 D) and BCVA loss (two to six lines). These 14 eyes underwent a further surgical treatment to remove the severe haze at 3 to 10 months after PRK. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we strongly advise against PRK as a possible option to correct eyes previously treated by myopic LASIK that resulted in an undercorrection.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate hyperopia with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: This prospective comparative single-surgeon study included 216 eyes of 108 patients with hyperopia who received PRK in 1 eye and LASEK in the contralateral eye. The mean patient age was 38.3 years (range 25 to 58 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction was +3.67 diopters (D) +/- 1.15 (SD) (range +2.00 to +5.00 D), and astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. In each patient, PRK was performed in 1 eye (Group A) and LASEK was performed in the other eye (Group B) using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, manifest and cycloplegic refractions, refractive stability and predictability, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were examined and statistically analyzed. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 1 week, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 58% of PRK eyes and 85% of LASEK eyes (P =.037); at 2 years, it was 20/40 or better in 81% and 91%, respectively (P =.076). At 2 years, the UCVA for near was N8 or better in 73% of PRK eyes and 89% of LASEK eyes (P =.064). No patient lost 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 in PRK eyes and 1.08 in LASEK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 6 months in LASEK eyes and at 12 months in PRK eyes. The mean SE cycloplegic refraction decreased from +3.58 D (PRK eyes) and +3.76 D (LASEK eyes) at baseline to +0.74 D and +0.32 D, respectively, at 2 years; in 57% and 78% of eyes, respectively, the refraction was within +/-0.50 D of the targeted refraction. Peripheral corneal haze scores at 3 to 9 months and pain scores at 1 to 3 days were significantly lower in the LASEK group than in the PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for hyperopia up to +5.00 D provided good visual and refractive results. It significantly reduced postoperative pain, grade of peripheral ring-shaped corneal haze, and regression of hyperopia. Hyperopic LASEK provided quicker visual recovery and achieved better efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability than hyperopic PRK.     

Phototherapeutic keratectomy with mitomycin C for corneal haze following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) with single application of mitomycin C for patients with severe corneal haze following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for high myopia. METHODS: Eight eyes of seven patients were treated with PTK and intraoperative topical application of mitomycin C (0.02%) for severe corneal haze (grade 3) following PRK for myopia. RESULTS: All patients' visual performance improved significantly. Mean preoperative visual acuity (20/200 for both UCVA and BSCVA) improved significantly to 20/33 (0.6) and 20/30 (0.7) for UCVA and BSCVA, respectively. Six eyes (85.7%) had improved UCVA to 20/40 or better and gained five or more lines of UCVA. The corneal haze score decreased from grade 3 initially (for all eyes prior to PTK and mitomycin C) to a final mean haze score of 0.3 (range 0 to 0.5). Mean final spherical equivalent refraction achieved was -1.30 +/- 1.60 D (range -3.75 to +1.25 D). One eye gained only three lines of visual acuity due to regression and residual haze. No adverse effects related to the use of mitomycin C were recorded. CONCLUSION: PTK with a single intraoperative application of mitomycin C was safe and effective in reducing corneal haze and improving visual acuity in patients with severe corneal haze following PRK.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for post-penetrating keratoplasty myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. SETTING: Gazi University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy was performed in 16 eyes of 16 patients with postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism who were unable to wear glasses due to anisometropia and were contact lens intolerant. They were examined for uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and corneal transplant integrity before and after surgery. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after PRK was 26.0 months +/- 15.7 (SD) (range 12 to 63 months). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of -4.47 +/- 1.39 diopters (D) was -3.39 +/- 1.84 D (P >.05) at the last postoperative visit and the mean preoperative cylinder of -5.62 +/- 2.88 D was -3.23 +/- 1.70 D (P <.05); refractive regression correlated with the amount of ablation performed. The BSCVA decreased in 3 eyes (18.8%), and the UCVA decreased in 2 (12.5%). Six eyes (37.5%) had grade 2 to 3 haze, which resolved spontaneously in 4 eyes within a relatively long time but caused a decrease in BSCVA in 2 (12.5%). Two of the eyes (12.5%) had a rejection episode after PRK and were successfully treated with topical steroids. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy to correct postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism appears to be less effective and less predictable than PRK for naturally occurring myopia and astigmatism. Corneal haze and refractive regression are more prevalent, and patient satisfaction is not good.