Comparison of survival after mitral valve replacement with biologic and mechanical valves in 1139 patients

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare 10-year survival in patients after mitral valve replacement with biologic or mechanical valve prostheses. METHODS: Retrospective survival analysis was performed on data from 1139 consecutive patients older than 18 years of age undergoing mitral valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards (n = 495; Baxter Healthcare Corp, Irvine, Calif) or St Jude Medical (n = 644; St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn) prostheses. RESULTS: The 10-year survival was not statistically different between the patients receiving Carpentier-Edwards valves and those receiving St Jude Medical valves (P =.16). Adjusted survival estimates at 2, 5, and 10 years were 82% +/- 2% (95% confidence intervals, 79%-85%), 69% +/- 2% (95% confidence intervals, 64%-73%), and 42% +/- 3% (95% confidence intervals, 37%-48%), respectively, for the Carpentier-Edwards group and 83% +/- 2% (95% confidence intervals, 80%-86%), 72% +/- 2% (95% confidence intervals, 69%-76%), and 51% +/- 3% (95% confidence intervals, 45%-58%), respectively, for the St Jude Medical group. Predictors of worse survival after mitral valve replacement are older age, lower ejection fraction, presence of class IV congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, renal disease, smoking history, hypertension, concurrent other valve surgery, and redo heart surgery. CONCLUSION: Choice of biologic or mechanical prosthesis does not significantly affect long-term patient survival after mitral valve replacement.     

Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare outcomes with tissue and St Jude Medical mechanical valves over a 20-year period. METHODS: Valve-related events and overall survival were analyzed in 2533 patients 18 years of age or older undergoing initial aortic, mitral, or combined aortic and mitral (double) valve replacement with a tissue valve (Hancock, Carpentier-Edwards porcine, or Carpentier-Edwards pericardial) or a St Jude Medical mechanical valve. Total follow-up was 13,390 patient-years. There were 666 St Jude Medical aortic valve replacements, 723 tissue aortic valve replacements, 513 St Jude Medical mitral valve replacements, 402 tissue mitral valve replacements, 161 St Jude Medical double valve replacements, and 68 tissue double valve replacements. The mean age was 68 +/- 13.3 years (St Jude Medical valve, 64.5 +/- 12.9; tissue valve, 72.0 +/- 12.6). RESULTS: There were no overall differences in survival between tissue and mechanical valves. Multivariable analysis indicated that the type of valve did not affect survival. Analysis by age less than 65 years or 65 years or older and presence or absence of coronary disease revealed similar long-term survival in all subgroups. The risk of hemorrhage was lower in patients receiving tissue aortic valve replacements but was not significantly different in patients receiving mitral valve or double valve replacements. Thromboembolism rates were similar for tissue and mechanical valve recipients. However, reoperation rates were significantly higher in patients receiving both aortic and mitral tissue valves. The reoperation hazard increased progressively with time both in patients receiving aortic and in those receiving mitral tissue valves. Overall valve complications were initially higher with mechanical aortic valves but not with mechanical mitral valves. However, valve complication rates later crossed over, with higher rates in tissue valve recipients after 7 years in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement and 10 years in those undergoing aortic valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue and mechanical valve recipients have similar survival over 20 years of follow-up. The primary tradeoff is an increased risk of hemorrhage in patients receiving mechanical aortic valve replacements and an increased risk of late reoperation in all patients receiving tissue valve replacements. The risk of tissue valve reoperation increases progressively with time.     

Impact of small prosthetic valve size on operative mortality in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: does gender matter?

OBJECTIVE: Ideal management of the elderly patient with a small aortic root remains controversial. This retrospective analysis was performed to determine whether small prosthetic valve size is related to outcome in patients 70 years of age or older undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. METHODS: Between December 1991 and July 1998, 366 patients 70 years of age or older (median age 77 years, range 73-81 years, 49% male) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass grafting with standard Carpentier-Edwards bovine pericardial valves (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Edwards Division, Santa Ana, Calif) (n = 277; 76%) or St Jude Medical mechanical valves (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn) (n = 89; 24%). Propensity scoring and multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the risks associated with implantation of 19-mm valves. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 16.7% (17/102) in patients who received 19-mm valves and 3% (8/264) among those receiving >/=21-mm valves (P /=21-mm valves was 6.4 (95% CI 2.7, 15.4; P 相似文献   

A retrospective comparative study of aortic valve replacement with St. Jude medical and medtronic-hall prostheses: a 20-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term clinical outcome of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical and Medtronic-Hall mechanical prostheses. DESIGN: From June 1978 to June 1982, 43 Medtronic-Hall and 48 St. Jude Medical mechanical valves were implanted in 90 consecutive patients with aortic valve disease, and their clinical outcome was retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: At 20 years in the St. Jude Medical group and in the Medtronic-Hall group the actuarial rates of overall survival were 50 and 49% (p = NS), of cardiovascular survival 66 and 63% (p = NS), of valve-related survival 95 and 91% (p = NS), of freedom from major valve-related complications 83 and 45% (p = 0.005), from major cerebrovascular events 93 and 71% (p =0.06), from valve thrombosis 97 and 89% (p = NS), from aortic valve reoperation 93 and 88% (p = NS), from major bleeding 96 and 82% (p = 0.04), and from endocarditis 93 and 82% (p = NS), respectively. The linearized rate of overall major aortic valve prosthesis-related complications was 3.47%/year in the Medtronic-Hall valve group and 1.53%/year in the St. Jude Medical valve group (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that the type of prosthesis was predictive of freedom from valve-related complications (p = 0.01; 2.849; C.I. 95%: 1.246-6.516). CONCLUSION: The aortic St. Jude Medical mechanical valve seems to be associated with a slightly lower rate of long-term valve-related morbidity than the aortic Medtronic-Hall mechanical valve. Because of the small patient population and the retrospective nature of the study, the choice between these two prostheses should not be made only on the basis of these findings. However, these results suggest a reappraisal for further comparative studies with such an extended follow-up.     

Baseline Platelet Aggregation and Major Receptor Expression Predict Subsequent Activity Following Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Objective - To compare the long-term clinical outcome of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical and Medtronic-Hall mechanical prostheses. Design - From June 1978 to June 1982, 43 Medtronic-Hall and 48 St. Jude Medical mechanical valves were implanted in 90 consecutive patients with aortic valve disease, and their clinical outcome was retrospectively assessed. Results - At 20 years in the St. Jude Medical group and in the Medtronic-Hall group the actuarial rates of overall survival were 50 and 49% ( p = NS), of cardiovascular survival 66 and 63% ( p = NS), of valve-related survival 95 and 91% ( p = NS), of freedom from major valve-related complications 83 and 45% ( p = 0.005), from major cerebrovascular events 93 and 71% ( p = 0.06), from valve thrombosis 97 and 89% ( p = NS), from aortic valve reoperation 93 and 88% ( p = NS), from major bleeding 96 and 82% ( p = 0.04), and from endocarditis 93 and 82% ( p = NS), respectively. The linearized rate of overall major aortic valve prosthesis-related complications was 3.47%/year in the Medtronic-Hall valve group and 1.53%/year in the St. Jude Medical valve group ( p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that the type of prosthesis was predictive of freedom from valve-related complications ( p = 0.01; 2.849; C.I. 95%: 1.246-6.516). Conclusion - The aortic St. Jude Medical mechanical valve seems to be associated with a slightly lower rate of longterm valve-related morbidity than the aortic Medtronic-Hall mechanical valve. Because of the small patient population and the retrospective nature of the study, the choice between these two prostheses should not be made only on the basis of these findings. However, these results suggest a reappraisal for further comparative studies with such an extended follow-up.     

Comparison of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount™ and St. Jude Medical Epic™ Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement—A Retrospective Echocardiographic Short-Term Study

Abstract   Objective: Stented biological prostheses show different performance related to their design and ultrastructure. Therefore, we compared the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount™ (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) and the St. Jude Medical Epic™ (SJM Epic™; St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) prostheses with respect to their hemodynamic features. Methods: Eighty-six patients underwent aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis (50 patients), aortic regurgitation (seven patients), or mixed lesion (29 patients) with these randomly assigned bioprostheses (Perimount™: 39 patients; SJM Epic™: 47 patients). Following informed consent, patients were examined postoperatively (mean 9.7 ± 4 months after surgery) with a detailed echocardiographic study, quality of life was determined by a standardized questionnaire. Results: Comparing the indexed effective orifice area (0.77 cm²/m² vs. 0.64 cm²/m²; p = 0.019), the mean pressure gradient (11.15 mmHg vs. 14.80 mmHg; p = 0.004) and the stroke-work loss (6.95% vs. 8.49%; p = 0.025), the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount™ demonstrated significantly better hemodynamic features than the SJM Epic™ prosthesis. These effects were more pronounced in the smaller prosthetic sizes. Conclusion: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount™ prosthesis was less obstructive than the SJM Epic™ in echocardiographic controls. Patient-prosthesis mismatch as determined by indexed effective orifice area showed no impact on functional recovery.     

Hemodynamic and hemolytic features of the St. Jude Medical valve prostheses

We performed valvular replacement in 86 cases (108 valves, 43 males, 43 females) from July 1978 to July 1981 with St. Jude Medical valves which utilize two discs made of pyrolytic carbon and employ a bileaflet central opening system. Ages ranged from 13 to 68 years (average 42.3). For all cases in this study, we performed anti-coagulant therapy. The incidence of thromboembolic complication was zero. With regard to postoperative clinical evaluation on valve function and chronic hemolysis, we compared the cases of St. Jude Medical valves with those of Starr-Edwards (S.E.) valves (aortic: Model 2320, mitral: Model 6400), Carpentier-Edwards (C.E.) valves and cases of open mitral commissurotomy. As for valve function such as left atrioventricular diastolic pressure gradient, mitral effective orifice area both at rest and on exercise, the St. Jude Medical valve yielded best results. Next was the C.E. and third was the S.E. The results of the St. Jude Medical valve group and those of the open mitral commissurotomy group were equivalent. In comparison with ball type cardiac valve prostheses and bioprostheses, the St. Jude Medical valve has excellent hemodynamic characteristic. Concerning hemolysis, the St. Jude Medical was below only the C.E., however the degree of hemolysis was so low that the St. Jude Medical valve holds great promise as central flow mechanical valve prostheses.     

Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: an interim report.

OBJECTIVE: This is a midterm report of a study comparing the clinical performance of CarboMedics and St Jude Medical heart valve prostheses through a projected 10-year period. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1996, a total of 485 patients undergoing mechanical valve replacement were prospectively randomly assigned to receive either CarboMedics (n = 234) or St Jude Medical (n = 251) prostheses for aortic (n = 288), mitral (n = 160), or double (n = 37) valve replacements and were followed up annually. RESULTS: Baseline and operative characteristics were similar between the two groups with respect to major demographic characteristics, preoperative clinical status, and operative data. Mean follow-up was 50 +/- 22 months for the CarboMedics group (97% complete) and 47 +/- 20 months for the St Jude Medical group (96% complete), yielding a total of 1959 patient-years. The 30-day mortality, and 5-year actuarial survival, and linearized survival were 6.0%, 82.4% +/- 2.6%, and 4.3% per patient-year in the CarboMedics group and 4.4%, 79.9% +/- 2.8%, and 4.7% per patient-year in the St Jude Medical group (log-rank P =.7). Freedom at 5 years from valve-related mortality, major thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and other nonstructural valve dysfunction was, respectively, 96.7% +/- 1.4% (0.7% per patient-year), 90.9% +/- 2.1% (2.2% per patient-year), 87.3% +/- 2.5% (3.6% per patient-year), and 96.1% +/- 1.4% (0.7% per patient-year) in the CarboMedics group and 95.9% +/- 1.5% (1.0% per patient-year), 92.5% +/- 1.8% (2.0% per patient-year), 82.6% +/- 2.8% (4.3% per patient-year), and 96.0% +/- 1.3% (0.6% per patient-year) in the St Jude Medical group, with no overall intergroup differences. No statistically significant intergroup differences in international normalized ratio values were detected during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows no significant differences in the early and midterm clinical outcomes between patients who received CarboMedics valve prostheses and those who received St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses. Choices with respect to valve type can be based on considerations other than patient outcome.     

Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative?

The controversy surrounding the choice of a prosthesis for valve replacement in the elderly patient prompted me to review the performance of mechanical (Medtronic Hall [Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.] and St. Jude Medical [St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.]) valves implanted in 213 patients 65 years and older (mean 70.4 years) from 1980 to 1985. There were 63 mitral, 131 aortic, and 19 double (aortic and mitral) valve replacements. Most patients undergoing aortic valve replacement had stenotic lesions, but half of the patients in the mitral valve replacement group had regurgitation with or without stenosis. Early mortality rates for mitral, aortic, and double valve replacement were 4.8%, 6.1%, and 21.1%, respectively (p less than 0.01). The mortality rate for patients 65 to 74 years old was 6.5% and that for those older than 75 years was 9.1%. The cumulative follow-up for the survivors was 850 patient-years. The late mortality rate was 8.1% per patient-year but was valve-related in only 1.3% per patient-year. Noncardiac causes accounted for 43.5% of the late deaths. The late mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who had regurgitant lesions than in those who had stenotic or mixed disease. It was also higher in the older patients (10.3% per patient-year) than in the younger group (7.6% per patient-year; p less than 0.05). Reoperation was required in only six patients (0.7% per patient-year). Thrombotic obstruction of the prosthesis and systemic thromboembolism occurred at linearized rates of 0.6% per patient-year and 2.5% per patient year, respectively, and significant anticoagulant-related hemorrhage at a rate of 0.6% per patient-year. With the exception of late mortality, the incidence of all late complications was similar to that of patients younger than 65 years operated on during the same period. Actuarially, global survival (58% +/- 4%) and freedom from reoperation (95% +/- 2%), from thrombotic obstruction (96% +/- 1%), from thromboembolism (92% +/- 2%), from all valve-related mortality and morbidity (82% +/- 3%), and from valve failure (93% +/- 2%) were also similar to those of the younger patients. Mechanical prostheses perform well in elderly patients. I could not confirm an increase in thromboembolic or hemorrhagic episodes, and the respective mortality and morbidity indexes were similar to those observed in younger patients.     

Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: Small-sized prostheses for aortic valve replacement may result in residual left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Aim of the study was to verify whether implantation of 19-mm versus 21-mm St. Jude Medical standard prostheses (St. Jude Medical, Inc, St. Paul, MN) influences long-term clinical outcome. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with 19 mm (group 1, 53 patients) or 21-mm St. Jude Medical standard prostheses (group 2, 176 patients) were included in the study. Mean follow-up of current survivors was 10+/-4 years. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 7.5% in group 1 and 8.5% in group 2. At discharge, an important patient-prosthesis mismatch (effective orifice area index < or = 0.60 cm2/m2) was present in 18% of group 1 versus 5% in group 2 (p = 0.004). Among patients with body surface area less than 1.70 m2, such mismatch was present in 15% of group 1 versus 2% of group 2 (p = 0.008). At last follow-up New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (p < 0.001), left ventricular mass reduction (p = 0.02), mean (p = 0.002) and peak transprosthetic gradients (p < 0.001), and effective orifice area index (p = 0.005) were significantly better in group 2. Freedom from sudden death (92%+/-5% vs 99%+/-1%, p = 0.01), valve-related death (84%+/-6% vs 90%+/-5%, p = 0.02), and cardiac events (56%+/-13% vs 86%+/-4%, p = 0.008), were significantly lower in group 1. Effective orifice area index was an independent predictor of late cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term results after aortic valve replacement with small-sized St. Jude Medical standard prostheses are satisfactory, 19-mm valve recipients show a high prevalence of important patient-prosthesis mismatch with less evident functional improvement and higher rate of cardiac events, suggesting a very cautious use of this prosthesis.     

The choice of anticoagulation in pediatric patients with the St. Jude Medical valve prostheses

Between February 1982 and January 1984 27 St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prostheses were implanted in 24 children ranging in age from 5 to 20 years (mean 12.38 years). There were 10 isolated aortic valve replacements, 14 isolated mitral valve replacements and one triple valve replacement (aortic, mitral and tricuspid). There was one operative and four late deaths. All patients were maintained on Aspirin and Dipyridamole from the early postoperative period. There were six documented thromboembolic events occurring in five patients. There were 0.68 thromboembolic events per patient year in the aortic valve group and 0.19 events in the mitral valve group. Because of the significant incidence of thromboembolic events in our patients, we now recommend universal anticoagulation with Coumadin in all pediatric age patients in whom the St. Jude Medical prosthesis is implanted.     

Valve replacement in the right side of the heart in children: long-term follow-up

Twenty-five patients (16 male, 9 female) underwent right-sided valve replacement (10 pulmonary valve replacement, 14 tricuspid valve replacement, 3 tricuspid plus pulmonary valve replacement, and 2 replacements of a single atrioventricular valve) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center from June 1977 to December 1986. Twenty-one patients (84%) are long-term survivors with 2,035 months follow-up (range, 41 to 143 months; mean, 96.9 months). Twenty-three Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthetic valves, one Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthetic valve, and nine St. Jude Medical valves were inserted. Follow-up of 17 patients with a Carpentier-Edwards valve ranged from 5 years 9 months to 11 years 9 months (mean, 8 years 11 months). To date there has been one reoperation after 3 years 4 months in this group. One patient who received an Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthesis required re-replacement at 20 months after operation. Three of 4 patients who received St. Jude mechanical valves and are long-term survivors have required replacement after 36 to 56 months. We conclude that the Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthetic valve is a viable option in the right side of the heart in the young age group when annular size is adequate to accommodate an appropriate bioprosthesis.     

Standard versus hemodynamic plus 19-mm St Jude Medical aortic valves

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed our experience with aortic valve replacement using 19-mm St Jude Medical prostheses (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn) in 119 patients, among which 68 (group A) had a Standard model and 51 (group B) had a Hemodynamic Plus model. METHODS: Comparison between the 2 models included analysis of early and late mortality and all valve-related complications. Postoperative echocardiography was performed to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of both prosthetic models. Laboratory tests were performed to evaluate the amount of red blood cell damage caused by the transprosthetic turbulent flow. RESULTS: Average body surface area was 1.66 +/- 0.14 m(2) in group A and 1.65 +/- 0.16 m(2) in group B (P =.72). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of preoperative variables (sex, cardiac rhythm, body surface area, preoperative gradients, and New York Heart Association class). Five-year follow-up was 100% complete. Although group A patients had significantly higher postoperative peak and mean gradients (P =.0001) and a lower effective orifice area (P =.0001), no statistical differences were found in terms of late (5-year) survival (P =.6) and postoperative complications (P =.09). Moreover, postoperative left ventricular mass was found to be similar in the 2 groups (P =.18). Hematologic evaluation did not show any significant difference between the 2 groups as to incidence of hemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement with 19-mm aortic prostheses in patients with a body surface area of less than 1.7 m(2) allows good results. Although Hemodynamic Plus models have better hemodynamic results, no significant difference was found in terms of clinical results and clinical hemolysis.     

Bivalvular mechanical mitral-aortic valve replacement in 254 patients: long-term results--a 22-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: We have retrospectively studied 254 patients who underwent a bivalvular mechanical mitral-aortic replacement in the cardiovascular and thoracic surgery unit of Nantes from 1979 to 1989. The follow-up was 22 years (1979 to 2001). The last patient was operated on 12 years before the end of the follow-up. METHODS: All mitral prostheses were St. Jude Medical (SJM) bileaflet valves, and the aortic prostheses were 124 monodisc Bj?rk-Shiley valves, 3 Sorin prostheses, and 127 St. Jude Medical bileaflet prostheses. The mean age was 56.8 +/- 8.5 years with a sex ratio equal to 1. Rheumatism as the etiology predominated with 79.5%. Ninety-seven percent of the patients were followed for a total of 2,779 patient-years and a mean of 11.7 years. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 7.08%. Freedom from overall mortality and valve-related mortality at 22 years were 45.7% +/- 3.6% and 73.1% +/- 3%, respectively. The linearized rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events were 1.07% and 0.9% per patient-year, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed age (p < 0.002), sex (p < 0.01), and degenerative etiology (p = 0.04) as independent factors of late mortality, and age, sex, degenerative disease, and tricuspid pathology were related to valve-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows good results after mechanical mitral-aortic replacement in terms of survival rate and quality of life in surviving patients, and outlines the factors influencing long-term results as compared with isolated mitral valve replacement.     

Clinical performance of St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses: a randomized comparative study

Newer and improved models of mechanical prostheses are regularly added to surgeons' armamentarium. This study was designed to compare the clinical performance of two of the most used current models of mechanical prostheses. From August 1983 through July 1985, 182 white patients were prospectively randomized to implantation of the St. Jude Medical (95 patients) or Medtronic-Hall (87 patients) prostheses. There were 84 mitral, 85 aortic, and 13 double (mitral and aortic) valve replacements. There were no differences between the two groups with regard to sex distribution, age, functional class, emergency operation, and site of implantation. Early mortality was 3.2% for patients with the St. Jude valve and 5.7% for those with the Medtronic-Hall (p = NS). The survivors were followed for 3 to 5 years (mean, 4.2 +/- 0.6 years; cumulative follow-up, 559 patient-years). Late mortality was 7.1%/patient-year for the St. Jude group and 3.2%/patient-year for the Medtronic-Hall group (p less than 0.05). However, the valve-related mortality was equal (1.4%/patient-year) for both groups. Noncardiac causes accounted for most of the difference between the St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall groups (2.5%/patient-year and 0.4%/patient-year, respectively). There were no cases of thrombotic obstruction, whereas serious systemic thromboembolism occurred at the rate of 1.8%/patient-year (5 episodes) for the St. Jude group and 2.5%/patient-year (7 episodes) for the Medtronic-Hall group (p = not significant); there were another nine episodes of systemic embolism that left no sequelae. Three patients (St. Jude, 2; Medtronic-Hall, 1), all of whom had aortic valve replacement, required reoperation (0.5%/patient-year) because of prosthetic endocarditis, with two deaths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mitral and mitro-aortic valve replacement with Sorin Bicarbon valves compared with St. Jude Medical valves

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the clinical results of two bileaflet mechanical valves: the St. Jude Medical (SJM) and the Sorin Bicarbon (Sorin Bicarbon) used either in single mitral valve replacement (MVR) or in double, aortic and mitral, valve replacement (DVR). METHODS: Between September 1990 and November 1995, 217 patients received either a St. Jude Medical (n=134) or a Sorin Bicarbon (n=86): 136 mitral valve replacement with 83 St. Jude Medical and 53 Sorin Bicarbon and 84 double valve replacement with 51 St. Jude Medical and 33 Sorin Bicarbon. There was no difference between both St. Jude Medical and Sorin Bicarbon cohorts in respect of mitral valve physiopathology, etiology of valve disease, associated lesions, echocardiographic and hemodynamic data. The only significant preoperative difference was the age of patients within the double valve replacement group and the size of implanted valves within the mitral valve replacement group. Follow-up was 100% complete with a mean of 39+/-18 months, ranging between 6 and 68 months. The total follow-up was 657 patient-years (pt-y): 396 pt-y in the mitral valve replacement group and 274 pt-y in the double valve replacement group. RESULTS: Hospital mortality (St. Jude Medical: 2.2%; Sorin Bicarbon: 6.9%) and late mortality (St. Jude Medical: 8.4%; Sorin Bicarbon: 6.3%) were not significantly different. Ten deaths were considered valve-related (St. Jude Medical 6, Sorin Bicarbon 4). The estimated 4-yr overall survival, including hospital mortality, was for St. Jude Medical--mitral valve replacement: 89+/-4% and St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 93+/-4%, and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 87+/-5% and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 91+/-5%. The linearized incidence (% per pt-y) of valve-related complications was 6.39 in the St. Jude Medical cohort and 9.2 in the Sorin Bicarbon cohort. The linearized incidence (% pt-y) of the prevalent complication, valve thromboembolism and bleeding, was for St. Jude Medical-mitral valve replacement: 3.41, St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 3.16 and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 2.17 and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 3.67. The differences between each group of an estimated 4-yr freedom from combined thromboembolism and bleeding were not significant (St. Jude Medical--mitral valve replacement: 90+/-4%, St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 84+/-6%, and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 94+/-3% and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 75+/-17%). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical non-randomized study, there was no evidence of any significant difference between St. Jude Medical and Sorin Bicarbon valves over a 4-yr follow-up.     

Twenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis

BACKGROUND: We have prospectively followed all adult St Jude Medical mechanical valve recipients at the Medical University of South Carolina since the initial implant in January 1979 and now present our 20-year experience. METHODS: We prospectively followed 837 valve recipients (aortic valve replacement; n = 478; mitral valve replacement; n = 359) from January 1979 to December 2000 at 12-month intervals. RESULTS: Ages ranged from 19 to 84 years. Follow-up averaged (mean +/- standard deviation) 7 +/- 5 years (98% complete). Patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV in 77% (aortic valve replacement) and 89% (mitral valve replacement) preoperatively. A 19-mm valve was implanted in 15.5% of aortic valve replacement patients. Coronary bypass was required in 31% of aortic valve replacements and 20% of mitral valve replacements. Operative mortality was 17/478 (3.6%) in aortic valve replacement and 19/359 (5.3%) in mitral valve replacement, and multivariable predictors were 19-mm valve size, 3 or more coronary bypass grafts, and New York Heart Association class IV for aortic valve replacement and New York Heart Association class IV and age for mitral valve replacement. Actuarial survivorship at 10 and 20 years was 57% +/- 3% and 26% +/- 5% for aortic valve replacement and 61% +/- 3% and 39% +/- 4% for mitral valve replacement. Multivariable predictors of late death were African-American ethnicity, New York Heart Association class III or IV, coronary bypass, and age for aortic valve replacement and New York Heart Association class III or IV, coronary bypass, and age for mitral valve replacement. For aortic valve replacement, effective orifice area was univariately (P =.002) but not multivariately (P =.378) predictive of late death. Structural valve deterioration was not observed. For aortic valve replacement, actuarial freedom (at 10 and 20 years) from reoperation was 93% +/- 1% and 90% +/- 2%; thromboembolism, 82% +/- 3% and 68% +/- 8%; bleeding events, 77% +/- 3% and 66% +/- 6%; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 94% +/- 1% and 94% +/- 1%; valve-related mortality, 94% +/- 2% and 86% +/- 4%; and valve-related mortality or morbidity, 58% +/- 3% and 32% +/- 8%. For mitral valve replacement, actuarial freedom (at 10 and 20 years) from reoperation was 96% +/- 1% and 90% +/- 3%; thromboembolism, 77% +/- 3% and 59% +/- 7%; bleeding events, 86% +/- 2% and 65% +/- 8%; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 98% +/- 1% and 96% +/- 2%; valve-related mortality, 89% +/- 0.2% and 74% +/- 8%; and valve-related mortality or morbidity, 63% +/- 3% and 29% +/- 7%. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 decades of observation with close follow-up, the St Jude Medical mechanical valve continues to be a reliable prosthesis.     

Simultaneous implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic and mitral prostheses

Since January 1980, 92 consecutive patients received St. Jude Medical aortic and mitral prostheses simultaneously. Mean age was 57.6 years (standard deviation 12.4); 14 were 70 years or older. Twenty-three had a previous cardiac operation and 22 had additional procedures performed at the time of double valve replacement. Before the operation 62% of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III and 29% were in class IV or required emergency operation. There were six (6.5%) deaths within 30 days. None of the hospital deaths were valve related; all occurred in patients who had additional risk concerns. Follow-up is 100% complete and ranges from 2 to 80 months, totaling 242 patient-years (mean 33.8 months). All except four hospital survivors reached class I or II and 40 patients (47%) remain asymptomatic. The actuarial survival rates are 82% at 1 year, 70% at 3 years, and 60% at 5 years. Causes of late death include heart failure (10), sudden, unexplained death (five), reoperation for coronary artery disease (one), noncardiac (four), and valve related (five). The linearized rate of fatal valve-related events is 2.1% pt-yr. A total of 22 valve-related complications (including five fatal) occurred is 18 patients, for a linearized rate or incidence of 9.1%/pt-yr. Eleven thromboembolic episodes (rate 4.6%/pt-yr) occurred in nine patients; three of these (1.2%/pt-yr) were fatal. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications represented 64% of all valve-related complications. Four patients had six episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis (incidence 2.5%/pt-yr), of which one (incidence 0.4%/pt-yr) was fatal. Paravalvular leak contributed to the fifth valve-related death. At 5 years, 83% of patients were free of thromboembolic complications; 94% were free of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage; and 71% were free of all valve-related complications. There are few comparable data for patients who have had simultaneous replacement of aortic and mitral valves with other mechanical prostheses. The total incidence of valve-related complications for patients with bioprostheses ranges between 3.9%/pt-yr and 10.4%/pt-yr and is similar to the 9.1%/pt-yr observed in the present series. The type of valve-related complication (thromboemboli and bleeding versus valve deterioration) is the principal difference between St. Jude Medical and bioprosthetic valves in patients who require simultaneous replacement of aortic and mitral valves.     

Replacement of the aortic valve in patients under 50 years of age: long-term follow-up of the St. Jude Medical prosthesis

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement in the young adult (aged 18 to 50 years) is a choice between a mechanical prosthesis with attendant lifelong anticoagulation or biological prostheses of varying types that may have limited life expectancy in this age group. METHODS: The Cardiac Surgical Research Foundation database was accessed to determine long-term outcomes in patients having aortic valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical Valve. This database has been privately maintained since the world's first St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve implant in 1977. Patients were contacted by questionnaire or by telephone if the survey was not returned. Follow-up was 93% complete. RESULTS: From October 1977 through October 1997, 271 patients less than 50 years of age had isolated aortic valve replacement. Follow-up was 1957 patient years. Thirty-day operative mortality was 1.1% with 18 late deaths, 4 of which were valve related. Ninety percent of survivor INR responses indicated a frequency of monthly INR checks or less. Valve-related events including percent per patient year and mortality related to these events included thromboembolism, 6 episodes (0.3% per patient year, no deaths); anticoagulant-related bleeding, 6 events (0.3% per patient year, 2 deaths); paravalvular leak, 6 events (0.3% per patient year, 2 deaths); valve thrombosis, 2 events (0.1% per patient year, no deaths); and endocarditis, 3 events (0.15% per patient year, no deaths). There was no incidence of structural valve failure. CONCLUSIONS: The SJM valve has a long record of excellent performance with durability lasting more than 20 years. The incidence of untoward events is low and death over time due to valve-related complications is low (4 of 271). The SJM valve has become our valve of choice for younger patients.     

Valve replacement in children: guidelines for selection of prosthesis and timing of surgical intervention

One hundred fifty-nine patients ranging from 3 months to 18 years old (mean, 8.1 +/- 3.7 years) underwent 162 primary valve implantations. A porcine valve was used in 104 patients, a St. Jude Medical valve in 40, and a Bj?rk-Shiley valve in 18. The valve replaced was the aortic in 25 patients, the mitral (systemic atrioventricular [AV] valve) in 43, the pulmonary in 71, and the tricuspid (pulmonary AV valve) in 23. Hospital mortality was 6%. Patients with a Bj?rk-Shiley valve received warfarin sodium anticoagulation, and those with a St. Jude Medical valve were given salicylates and dipyridamole. Follow-up is available on all patients 0.6 to 12 years postoperatively (mean, 6.3 +/- 2.6 years). New York Heart Association Functional Class improved in 62% and remained unchanged in 38% of the patients. Thromboembolic complications occurred in only 8 (57%) of 14 patients with a St. Jude Medical valve in the right (pulmonary) side and in 3 (12%) of 26 with the valve in the left (systemic) side of the circulation. Bacterial endocarditis developed in 3 patients, all with porcine valves. Early valve replacement, less than 2 years after detection of hemodynamic deterioration, resulted in improvement in the ventricular ejection fraction in 25 of 29 patients (from 81 +/- 14% to 90 +/- 12% of normal; p less than 0.05). In contrast, the ejection fraction remained abnormal in all 22 patients with delayed valve insertion (more than 2 years) (81 +/- 16% of normal preoperatively and 80 +/- 10% of normal following operation; p = not significant).