Intra-arterial hepatic fotemustine for the treatment of liver metastases from uveal melanoma: experience in 101 patients.

BACKGROUND: Exclusive liver metastases occur in up to 40% of patients with uveal melanoma associated with a median survival of 2-7 months. Single agent response rates with commonly available chemotherapy are below 10%. We have investigated the use of fotemustine via direct intra-arterial hepatic (i.a.h.) administration in patients with uveal melanoma metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients from seven centers were treated with i.a.h. fotemustine, administered intra-arterially weekly for a 4-week induction period, and then as a maintenance treatment every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. RESULTS: A median of eight fotemustine infusions per patient were delivered (range 1-26). Catheter related complications occurred in 23% of patients; however, this required treatment discontinuation in only 10% of the patients. The overall response rate was 36% with a median overall survival of 15 months and a 2-year survival rate of 29%. LDH, time between diagnosis and treatment start and gender were significant predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Locoregional treatment with fotemustine is well tolerated and seems to improve outcome of this poor prognosis patient population. Median survival rates are among the longest reported and one-third of the patients are still alive at 2 years.     

Liver metastases from melanoma: hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy. A retrospective study

The liver is the primary site of metastases in most uveal melanoma patients. We retrospectively investigated intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) as treatment for patients with hepatic melanoma metastases.Twenty-three patients (18 with uveal melanoma) received fotemustine (14 patients, 61.9%) or carboplatin (9 patients, 31.1%) via hepatic IAC delivery. The catheter was introduced through percutaneous access to the femoral artery with drugs delivered directly to the hepatic artery, and was removed at the end of each treatment cycle. A total of 3 cycles was planned, repeated every 21 days. However, patients with a clinical response could receive more than 3 cycles, provided that the toxic effects were acceptable.IAC was well tolerated and no catheter-related complications or grade 4 toxicities were reported. Considering only uveal melanoma patients, the overall response rate and disease control rate was 16.7% and 38.9%, respectively. Median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI 3.7-10.5) and median overall survival was 21 months (95% CI 8-39).IAC is well tolerated and is a valid choice for patients with a poor prognosis since median survival rates are among the longest reported.     

Infrequent promoter methylation of the MGMT gene in liver metastases from uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma is associated with a high mortality rate once metastases occur, with over >90% of metastatic patients dying within less than 1 year from metastases to the liver. The intraarterial hepatic (iah) administration of the alkylating agent fotemustine holds some promise with response rates of 36% and median survival of 15 months. Here, we investigated whether the DNA-repair-protein MGMT may be involved in the variability of response to fotemustine and temozolomide in uveal melanoma. Epigenetic inactivation of MGMT has been demonstrated to be a predictive marker for benefit from alkylating agent therapy in glioblastoma. We found a methylated MGMT promoter in 6% of liver metastases from 34 uveal melanoma patients. The mean MGMT activity measured in liver metastases with negligible liver tissue content was significantly lower than in liver tissue (146 versus 523 fmol/mg protein, p = 0.002). Expression of the MGMT protein was detectable in 50% of 88 metastases by immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray. Expression was heterogeneous, and in accordance with MGMT activity data, usually lower than in the surrounding liver. Differential MGMT activity/expression between metastasis and liver tissue and more efficient depletion of MGMT with higher doses of alkylating agent therapy using iah delivery may provide the pharmacologic window for the higher response rate. However, these results do not support MGMT methylation status or protein expression as predictive markers for treatment outcome to iah chemotherapy with alkylating agents.     

Hepatic intra-arterial versus intravenous fotemustine in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma (EORTC 18021): a multicentric randomized trial

BackgroundIn uveal melanoma (UM) with metastatic disease limited to the liver, the effect of an intrahepatic treatment on survival is unknown. We investigated prospectively the efficacy and toxicity of hepatic intra-arterial (HIA) versus systemic (IV) fotemustine in patients with liver metastases from UM.Patients and methodsPatients were randomly assigned to receive either IV or HIA fotemustine at 100 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15 (and 22 in HIA arm only) as induction, and after a 5-week rest period every 3 weeks as maintenance. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were secondary end points.ResultsAccrual was stopped after randomization of 171 patients based on the results of a futility OS analysis. A total of 155 patients died and 16 were still alive [median follow-up 1.6 years (range 0.25–6 years)]. HIA did not improve OS (median 14.6 months) when compared with the IV arm (median 13.8 months), hazard ratio (HR) 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–1.50, log-rank P = 0.59. However, there was a significant benefit on PFS for HIA compared with IV with a median of 4.5 versus 3.5 months, respectively (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45–0.84, log-rank P = 0.002). The 1-year PFS rate was 24% in the HIA arm versus 8% in the IV arm. An improved RR was seen in the HIA (10.5%) compared with IV treatment (2.4%). In the IV arm, the most frequent grade ≥3 toxicity was thrombocytopenia (42.1%) and neutropenia (62.6%), compared with 21.2% and 28.7% in the HIA arm. The main grade ≥3 toxicity related to HIA was catheter complications (12%) and liver toxicity (4.5%) apart from two toxic deaths.ConclusionHIA treatment with fotemustine did not translate into an improved OS compared with IV treatment, despite better RR and PFS. Intrahepatic treatment should still be considered as experimental.EudraCT number and ClinicalTrials.gov identifier2004-002245-12 and NCT00110123.     

Iterative treatment with surgery and radiofrequency ablation of uveal melanoma liver metastasis: Retrospective analysis of a series of very long-term survivors

BackgroundAfter treatment of primary ocular uveal melanoma (UM), up to 50% of patients will develop metastases, mostly in the liver. Systemic treatments do not provide any overall survival benefit for these patients and surgery remains the most effective therapy for selected patients. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) alone or in combination with surgery is frequently used to spare hepatic parenchyma. When patients relapse after treatment of their first metastases, and when the liver recurrence is limited, new local liver treatment is questionable.MethodsA total of 14 patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma (LMUM) were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had a complete first liver resection and a second treatment with RFA. Overall survival, recurrence-free interval after the first and the second treatment was evaluated.ResultsTreatment of hepatic recurrence was percutaneous RFA for ten patients and per-operative RFA for four patients associated with new metastasectomy. The median time to onset of LMUMs after ocular UM treatment was 50 months, and the median time to recurrence of hepatic metastasis after the first liver treatment was 20 months. The overall survival was 70% at five years and 35% at ten years. The recurrence-free interval was 50% and 56% at two years after the first and the second treatment, respectively.ConclusionProlonged survival can be achieved by exclusive and iterative local treatment combining surgery and RFA in a small proportion of patients with a first recurrence of isolated LMUM.     

Isolated hepatic perfusion with high-dose melphalan for the treatment of uveal melanoma metastases confined to the liver

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular tumour in adults. After treatment of the primary tumour, up to 50% of patients will ultimately develop metastases. Treatment options for metastases are limited. When uveal melanoma metastases are confined to the liver, isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) could be a treatment option. Herein, we report the results of a small group of patients with uveal melanoma metastases of the liver treated with IHP. Eight patients with uveal melanoma metastases confined to the liver underwent IHP with high-dose melphalan (200 mg) for 1 h. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and tumour response was assessed according to World Health Organization criteria. The tumour response rate (complete or partial remission) was 50%. The median time to progression was 6.7 months (range, 1.7-16.9 months). The overall median survival was 9.9 months (range, 4.7-34.6 months), with a 1 year survival of 50% and a 2 year survival of 37.5%. Three patients experienced grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity which was transient within 3 months. Although only a small group of patients has been treated and evaluated so far, IHP is a treatment option for uveal melanoma metastases confined to the liver which can result in tumour responses and may lead to survival benefits in a selective group of patients.     

Metastatic melanoma to the liver: A contemporary and comprehensive review of surgical,systemic, and regional therapeutic options

Effective management of hepatic metastases from ocular and cutaneous melanoma remains a major therapeutic challenge. Treatment options include hepatic resection, hepatic intra‐arterial (HIA) chemotherapy, chemoembolization, and hepatic perfusions. Evaluating the efficacy of these interventions is limited by the retrospective nature of most of the data, although controlled phase 3 studies are starting to emerge. Studies of hepatic resection are strongly suggestive of a survival benefit following surgery in selected patients. Effective systemic agents for metastatic cutaneous melanoma are available and supported by randomized controlled phase 3 trials. In contrast, no active systemic treatment has yet been identified for metastatic ocular melanoma. HIA and intravenous delivery of fotemustine have been compared in a randomized phase 3 trial in patients with unresectable metastases from melanoma, but no differences between the 2 approaches were observed. Hepatic arterial chemoembolization appears only to be moderately effective according to uncontrolled studies; targeting patients with less liver involvement may improve outcomes. A recent phase 3 study showed a significant improvement in hepatic progression‐free survival with percutaneous hepatic perfusion compared with best alternative care in patients with metastatic melanoma; however, the overall survival analysis was confounded by crossover of control patients to active treatment. In conclusion, hepatic resection offers the possibility of long‐term survival in carefully selected patients with liver‐limited metastases from melanoma. In patients with unresectable cutaneous melanoma, effective systemic therapy is the best treatment option. For patients with unresectable ocular melanoma, regional treatments are likely to assume a greater role until effective systemic treatments are identified. Cancer 2014;120:781–789 . © 2013 American Cancer Society.     

Predictive Impact of The Inflammation-based Indices in Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases Treated with Transarterial Hepatic Chemoperfusion

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to evaluate pretreatment inflammatory markers as prognostic factors in patients with unresectable uveal melanoma liver metastases treated with transarterial hepatic chemoperfusion.Patients and methods54 patients (44% male, median age: 61 years) were retrospectively assessed. A median of 3 (range: 1–11) treatment sessions were performed with melphalan (92%) or fotemustin (8%). Inflammatory indices were calculated as follows: neutrophils/nl to lymphocytes/nl ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index ([platelets/nl × neutrophils/nl]/[lymphocytes/nl]; SII), and platelets/nl to lymphocytes/nl ratio (PLR). The cut-off for dichotomization purposes was set at the median (inflammatory indices, hepatic tumor burden) or the upper level of normal. Kaplan Meier analysis was performed for median overall survival (OS) in months, and Cox proportional hazard model for uni(UVA) and multivariate (MVA) hazard ratio (HR, 95%CI) analyses were performed.ResultsMedian OS of the study cohort was 7.7 (6.3–10.9) months. In UVA OS was prolonged for low C reactive protein (CRP) (13.5 vs. 5.2; p = 0.0005), low SII (10.8 vs. 5.6; p = 0.0005), low NLR (11.1 vs. 6.3; p = 0.0045), low aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (11.5 vs. 5.6; p = 0.015), alanine aminotransferases (ALT) (11.5 vs. 5.6; p = 0.01), and tumor burden ≦ 50% (8.2 vs. 4.8; p = 0.007). MVA confirmed low CRP (HR: 0.29, 0.11–0.7; p = 0.005), low SII (HR: 0.19, 0.11–0.7; p = 0.008), and low ALT (HR: 0.13, 0.02–0.63; p = 0.011) as independent predictors for prolonged OS. Patients with ≦ 1, 2, 3 elevated significant MVA-factors survived a median of 14.9, 7.7, and 3.9 months, respectively (p = 0.0001).ConclusionsPretreatment inflammatory markers (CRP, SII) and AST were independent prognostic survival markers in patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases treated with transarterial hepatic chemoperfusion. A combination of factors may help to identify patients potentially benefitting from treatment.Key words: uveal melanoma, liver metastases, transarterial hepatic chemoperfusion, melphalan, inflammatory markers     

Three-year follow-up of advanced melanoma patients who received ipilimumab plus fotemustine in the Italian Network for Tumor Biotherapy (NIBIT)-M1 phase II study

Long-term analysis of the NIBIT-M1 trial continues to demonstrate efficacy of the combination of ipilimumab and fotemustine in metastatic melanoma patients with or without brain metastases. The addition of fotemustine to ipilimumab does not impair its immunomodulatory activity.BackgroundIn the NIBIT-M1 study, we reported a promising activity of ipilimumab combined with fotemustine in metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with or without brain metastases. To corroborate these initial findings, we now investigated the long-term efficacy of this combination.Patients and methodsThis analysis captured the 3-year outcome of MM patients who received ipilimumab combined with fotemustine as first- or second-line treatment. Median overall survival (OS), 3-year survival rates, immune-related (ir) progression-free survival (irPFS), brain PFS, and ir duration of response (irDOR) for the entire population and for patients with brain metastases were assessed. Clinical results were correlated with circulating CD3⁺CD4⁺ICOS⁺CD45RO⁺ or CD45RA⁺ T cells, neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratios, and tumorBRAF-V600 mutational status.ResultsEighty-six MM patients, including 20 with asymptomatic brain metastases that had been pre-treated with radiotherapy in 7 subjects, were enrolled in the study. With a median follow-up of 39.9 months, median OS and 3-year survival rates were 12.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1–18.7 months] and 28.5% for the whole study population, and 12.7 months (95% CI 2.7–22.7 months) and 27.8% for patients with brain metastases, respectively. Long-term ir adverse events consisting of G1 rush and pruritus occurred in 21% of patients. The absolute increase from baseline to week 12 in ‘memory’ but not in ‘naïve’ T cells identified patients with a better survival (P = 0.002). The N/L ratio correlated with a significantly better survival at early time points.BRAF status did not correlate with clinical outcome.ConclusionsLong-term analysis of the NIBIT-M1 trial continues to demonstrate efficacy of ipilimumab combined with fotemustine in MM patients. Fotemustine does not seem to impair the immunologic activity of ipilimumab.EudraCT number2010-019356-50.CinicalTrials.govNCT01654692.     

Adjuvant intra-arterial hepatic fotemustine for high-risk uveal melanoma patients

Uveal melanoma metastases occur most commonly in the liver. Given the 50% mortality rate in patients at high risk of developing liver metastases, we tested an adjuvant intra-arterial hepatic (i.a.h.) chemotherapy with fotemustine after proton beam irradiation of the primary tumour. We treated 22 high-risk patients with adjuvant i.a.h. fotemustine. Planned treatment duration was 6 months, starting with four weekly doses of 100 mg/m(2), and after a 5-week rest, repeated every 3 weeks. The survival of this patient group was compared with that of a 3 : 1 matched control group randomly selected from our institutional database. Half of the patients experienced > or =grade 3 hepatotoxicity (one patient developing cholangitis 8 years later). Catheter-related complications occurred in 18%. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years for the fotemustine group and 8.5 years for the control group, median overall survival was 9 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-12.7] and 7.4 years (95% CI 5.4-12.7; P=0.5), respectively, with 5-year survival rates of 75 and 56%. Treatment with adjuvant i.a.h. fotemustine is feasible. However, toxicities are important. Although our data suggest a survival benefit, it was not statistically significant. Confirming such a benefit would require a large, internationally coordinated, prospective randomized trial.     

肝动脉泵生物化疗治疗进展期黑色素瘤肝转移Ⅱ期临床研究

背景与目的：黑色素瘤肝转移全身治疗效果不佳,国外研究发现肝动脉灌注化疗可显著改善疗效,本研究进一步探讨肝动脉泵为基础的生物化疗治疗肝转移的疗效及对生存期的影响。方法：选择进展期黑色素瘤肝转移患者21例,予肝动脉泵置入,行淋巴细胞删除性化疗（福莫司汀＋达卡巴嗪）,化疗后立刻进行自体细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞回输．并同时应用白介素-2、粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子治疗,28d为一周期。疗效评定采用实体瘤疗效评价标准。对21例患者的疾病控制率、不良反应发生率、无进展生存期、总生存期进行分析。结果：可评价疗效患者共17例,完全缓解1例,部分缓解1例,稳定6例．进展9例。疾病控制率47．06％（8／17）。中位无进展生存期3个月。中位生存期6个月。Ⅲ～Ⅳ级的不良反应占38．1％（8／21）。结论：对于进展期黑色素瘤肝转移患者。以肝动脉泵为基础的生物化疗可明显改善患者的疾病控制率。无进展生存期、总生存期有延长趋势,毒副作用可耐受,是一种有良好前景的治疗模式。     

The effect of perfusate buffering on toxicity and response in isolated hepatic perfusion for uveal melanoma liver metastases

Background: Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) is a treatment option for patients with liver metastases. Previous studies have found that liver toxicity is one of the limiting factors, and in an attempt to reduce the toxicity a buffering agent was added to the perfusate. The aim was to retrospectively analyse if this buffering reduced toxicity and complication rates.

Methods: A retrospective review of 52 consecutive patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases treated with IHP between 2005 and 2013. Patients were followed by daily liver function tests (LFT). Toxicity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE; United States Department of Health &; Human Services, Washington, D.C), complications according to Clavien-Dindo and response according to RECIST-criteria.

Results: Thirty-six patients were treated with a buffered perfusate and 16 patients without buffer. There was no difference in age, gender, largest tumour size or number of tumours between the groups. There was a significantly lower mean in peak ALT, AST, PK (INR) and bilirubin when comparing buffer with no-buffer. There were five major complications without a significant difference between the groups (8.3 vs. 12.5%, p?=?0.33). There was a lower complete response (CR) rate (11 vs. 44%, p?=?0.023) and a trend for shorter time to local progression (9.2 vs. 17.6 months, p?=?0.096); however, not significant in multivariate analysis. There was no difference in survival (24.2 vs. 26.0 months, p?=?0.43) between the two groups.

Conclusions: Adding buffer to the perfusate during IHP significantly reduces postoperative LFTs; however, without a reduced complication rate. Interestingly, buffering also seems to reduce the response rate; however, this did not translate into a survival difference. To address if buffering adds any clinical benefit to the patients concerning toxicity, a larger prospective trial is necessary.     

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan in uveal melanoma: A safe and effective treatment modality in an orphan disease

Background

Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) carries a poor prognosis; liver is the most frequent and often solitary site of recurrence. Available systemic treatments have not improved outcomes. Melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M‐PHP) allows selective intrahepatic delivery of high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of outcomes data of UM patients receiving M‐PHP at two institutions was performed. Tumor response and toxicity were evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03, respectively.

Results

A total of 51 patients received 134 M‐PHP procedures (median of 2 M‐PHPs). 25 (49%) achieved a partial (N = 22, 43.1%) or complete hepatic response (N = 3, 5.9%). In 17 (33.3%) additional patients, the disease stabilized for at least 3 months, for a hepatic disease control rate of 82.4%. After median follow‐up of 367 days, median overall progression free (PFS) and hepatic progression free survival (hPFS) was 8.1 and 9.1 months, respectively and median overall survival was 15.3 months. There were no treatment related fatalities. Non‐hematologic grade 3‐4 events were seen in 19 (37.5%) patients and were mainly coagulopathic (N = 8) and cardiovascular (N = 9).

Conclusions

M‐PHP results in durable intrahepatic disease control and can form the basis for an integrated multimodality treatment approach in appropriately selected UM patients.     

Metastatic uveal melanoma: is there a role for conventional chemotherapy? - A single center study based on 58 patients

Uveal melanoma metastases develop in 6.5-35% of patients, most commonly to the liver. Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) survival is poor, with 5-7 months of median survival. We reviewed retrospectively all patients with MUM diagnosed between January 1990 and December 2008 at our institution. We analyzed a total of 58 patients with a median age of 61 years (31-84 years). Median time for metastases development was 25.63 months (0.17-102.43 months). Fifty-six patients had hepatic involvement, 63.8% bilobar and 51.7% had more than or equal to five hepatic metastatic lesions. Sixteen patients (27.6%) had two or more organs involved. Six patients (10.71%) were treated with surgery, 25 patients (44.67%) received systemic chemotherapy, and 23 (41.07%) had best supportive care (BSC). The median overall survival (OS) for all the patients was 10.83 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.92-14.74]. Patients who had undergone chemotherapy presented 10.83 months (95% CI: 5.35-16.308) of median OS whereas the patients who did not undergo this treatment had an OS of 8.033 months (95% CI: 2.46-13.61). There were more patients with poor survival characteristics such as worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in the BSC group. OS was poor in treated and BSC patients. Differences in survival are more likely to be related to patient characteristics rather than to a chemotherapy effect. Patients with MUM should be included in clinical trials evaluating other options with newer agents.     

Isolated hypoxic hepatic perfusion with melphalan in patients with irresectable ocular melanoma metastases

Aim

Ocular melanoma prefers to metastasize to the liver and the liver is the sole site of metastatic disease in 80% of patients. Until now there has been no standard treatment available and these patients have a very poor prognosis (median survival 2–5 months). Isolated hepatic perfusion may be an option in patients with irresectable hepatic ocular melanoma metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate applicability, toxicity and response in this selected group of ocular melanoma patients by treatment with isolated hypoxic hepatic perfusion with retrograde outflow (IHHP) with melphalan.

Methods

From September 2002 until July 2006 eight consecutive patients were included in this study. IHHP was performed with inflow via the hepatic artery and retrograde outflow via the portal vein during 25 min with 1 mg/kg melphalan. The perfusion was followed by a complete wash-out procedure.

Results

The median total operation time was 4 h with a median blood/fluid loss of 1100 ml. No postoperative mortality was observed. Median hospital stay was 9.5 days. Toxicity was moderate: WHO grade 3 leukocytopenia in 3 patients, grade 3 hepatic toxicity in 1 patient. In 37% of patients (3/8) a partial response could be demonstrated 3 months after IHHP. Stable disease was found in 3 patients and progressive disease in 2 patients. Median time to local progression was 6 months and the median survival was 11 months.

Conclusion

Melphalan-based IHHP with retrograde outflow is a safe treatment option for patients with irresectable ocular melanoma metastases. Survival benefit seems to be comparable to classical IHHP.     

Surgical management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma: 16 years' experience at the Institut Curie

Background

Uveal melanoma is characterised by a high prevalence of liver metastases and a poor prognosis.

Aim

To review the evolving surgical management of this challenging condition at a single institution over a 16-year period.

Patients and Methods

Between January 1991 and June 2007, among 3873 patients with uveal melanoma, 798 patients had liver metastases. We undertook a detailed retrospective review of their clinical records and surgical procedures. The data was evaluated with both uni- and multivariate statistical analysis for predictive survival indicators.

Results

255 patients underwent surgical resection. The median interval between ocular tumour diagnosis and liver surgery was 68 months (range 19–81). Liver surgery was either microscopically complete (R0; n = 76), microscopically incomplete (R1; n = 22) or macroscopically incomplete (R2; n = 157). The median overall postoperative survival was 14 months, but increased to 27 months when R0 resection was possible.With multivariate analysis, four variables were found to independently correlate with prolonged survival: an interval from primary tumour diagnosis to liver metastases >24 months, comprehensiveness of surgical resection (R0), number of metastases resected (≤4) and absence of miliary disease.

Conclusions

Surgical resection, when possible, is able to almost double the survival and appears at present the optimal way of improving the prognosis in metastatic uveal melanoma. Advances in medical treatments will be required to further improve survival.     

Chemoembolization of the hepatic artery with BCNU for metastatic uveal melanoma: results of a phase II study

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults and the liver is the most common site for systemic metastases. We conducted a phase II clinical trial for patients with hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma using chemoembolization of the hepatic artery with 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) dissolved in ethiodized oil. Gelatin sponge particles were used as a transiently occlusive agent. The responses in hepatic metastases, overall survival, time to progression and side-effects related to chemoembolization were evaluated. Thirty patients were enrolled. Twenty-four patients completed at least one treatment to all targeted liver metastases and were evaluable for hepatic response. Eighteen of these 24 patients experienced regression or stabilization of hepatic metastases for at least 6 weeks (one complete response in hepatic metastases; four partial responses; 13 stable disease). One of the 13 patients with stable disease was rendered free of disease by surgical removal of metastases after chemoembolization (surgical complete response). The overall response rates (complete and partial responses) for intention-to-treat patients and for patients who were evaluable for response were 16.7 and 20.4%, respectively. The median overall survival of the entire intention-to-treat group of patients was 5.2 months (range, 0.1-27.6 months), for patients with complete or partial response in hepatic metastases 21.9 months (range, 7.4-27.6 months), for patients with stable disease 8.7 months (range, 2.9-14.4 months) and for patients with progressive disease 3.3 months (range, 1.6-5.6 months). Importantly, 13 of the 18 patients who achieved complete response, partial response or stable disease subsequently developed progression of extrahepatic metastases with control of hepatic metastases. Chemoembolization with BCNU is a useful palliative treatment for the control of hepatic metastases in uveal melanoma patients. However, progression in extrahepatic sites after stabilization of hepatic metastases requires further improvement in the therapeutic approach to this disease.     

Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with pre-treated,uveal melanoma

BackgroundPatients with advanced uveal melanoma have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Ipilimumab is approved for pre-treated adult patients with advanced melanoma. However, because previous clinical trials with ipilimumab have excluded patients with uveal melanoma, data in this patient population are limited.Patients and methodsPre-treated patients with advanced uveal melanoma received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg through an expanded access programme, every 3 weeks for four doses. Tumour assessments were conducted at baseline and after completion of treatment and patients were monitored throughout for adverse events.ResultsAmong 82 assessable patients, 4 (5%) had an immune-related objective response and 24 (29%) had immune-related stable disease lasting ≥3 months for an immune-related disease control rate of 34%. With a median follow-up of 5.6 months, median overall survival (OS) was 6.0 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months. The 1-year rates of OS and PFS were 31% and 11%, respectively. The safety profile of ipilimumab was similar to that in patients with cutaneous melanoma.ConclusionsThese data suggest ipilimumab 3 mg/kg is a feasible option in pre-treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Evidence of disease control and a 1-year survival rate of 31% indicate the need for further investigation in randomised, controlled trials to determine the optimal timing and use of ipilimumab in this patient population.     

Treatment of disseminated ocular melanoma with sequential fotemustine,interferon alpha,and interleukin 2

Malignant melanoma of the uvea is remarkable for purely haematogenous dissemination and its tendency to metastasise to the liver. Although the liver is involved in up to 95% of patients, 50% of these also develop extrahepatic metastases, most often in the lungs, bone, skin, and brain. The only effective treatments reported to date relied on hepatic arterial chemoembolisation or -perfusion. The objective of this study was to establish a therapy protocol addressing patients with both sole liver involvement and systemic disease. Forty-eight patients with metastatic ocular melanoma received fotemustine 100 mg m(-2) either as 60-min infusion into the hepatic artery or as 15-min infusion via a peripheral vein, depending on the metastatic sites involved, i.e., restriction to the liver or hepatic together with extrahepatic disease. For the first treatment cycle this infusion was repeated after one week. For all cycles, subsequent to a three week resting period, patients received an immunotherapy consisting of subcutaneous interleukin 2 and interferon alpha(2). Although objective responses were more frequent within the cohort receiving intraarterial fotemustine (21.7 vs 8%), this difference did not translate into a significant benefit in overall survival, i.e., 369 and 349 days, respectively. Of note, this overall survival is much longer than that repeatedly reported for stage IV uveal melanoma not treated with fotemustine, suggesting a therapeutic activity of this cytostatic drug even after systemic administration.     

Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma: a phase III study.

PURPOSE: To compare fotemustine and dacarbazine (DTIC) in terms of overall response rate (ORR) as primary end-point and overall survival, duration of responses, time to progression, time to occurrence of brain metastases (BM), and to assess safety and quality of life in patients with disseminated cutaneous melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received either intravenous fotemustine 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks or DTIC 250 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks (two cycles). Nonprogressive patients received a maintenance treatment every 4 weeks (fotemustine 100 mg/m2 or DTIC 250 mg/m2 for 5 days). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to fotemustine or DTIC arms. The best ORR was higher in the fotemustine arm than in the DTIC arm in the intent-to-treat population (n=229; 15.2% v 6.8%; P=.043) and in full analysis set (n=221) (15.5% v 7.2%; P=.053). Similar median durations of responses (5.8 months with fotemustine v 6.9 months with DTIC) and time to progression (1.8 v 1.9 months, respectively) were observed. In patients without BM at inclusion, the median time to BM was 22.7 months with fotemustine versus 7.2 months with DTIC (P=.059). Median survival was 7.3 months with fotemustine versus 5.6 months with DTIC (P=.067). The main toxicity was grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (51% with fotemustine v 5% with DTIC) and thrombocytopenia (43% v 6%, respectively). No significant difference was noted for quality of life between arms. CONCLUSION: ORR was higher in the fotemustine arm compared to the DTIC arm in first-line treatment of disseminated melanoma. A trend in favor of fotemustine in terms of overall survival and time to BM was evidenced.