Necrotizing fasciitis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the defining characteristics and treatment of necrotizing fasciitis (NF), emphasizng early diagnostic indications.

QUALITY OF EVIDENCE

PubMed was searched using the terms necrotizing fasciitis and necrotizing soft tissue infections, paired with early diagnosis. Results were limited to human studies in English. Additional articles were obtained from references within articles. Evidence is levels II and III.

MAIN MESSAGE

Necrotizing fasciitis is classified according to its microbiology (polymicrobial or monomicrobial), anatomy, and depth of infection. Polymicrobial NF mostly occurs in immunocompromised individuals. Monomicrobial NF is less common and affects healthy individuals who often have a history of trauma (usually minor). Patients with NF can present with symptoms of sepsis, systemic toxicity, or evidence of skin inflammation, with pain that is disproportional to the degree of inflammation. However, these are also present in less serious conditions. Hyperacute cases present with sepsis and quickly progress to multiorgan failure, while subacute cases remain indolent, with festering soft-tissue infection. Because the condition is rare with minimal specific signs, it is often misdiagnosed. If NF is suspected, histology of tissue specimens is necessary. Laboratory and radiologic tests can be useful in deciding which patients require surgical consultation. Once NF is diagnosed, next steps include early wound debridement, excision of nonviable tissue, and wide spectrum cover with intravenous antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Necrotizing fasciitis is an uncommon disease that results in gross morbidity and mortality if not treated in its early stages. At onset, however, it is difficult to differentiate from other superficial skin conditions such as cellulitis. Family physicians must have a high level of suspicion and low threshold for surgical referral when confronted with cases of pain, fever, and erythema.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration across clinically important subgroups of patients with severe sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapy, a recombinant human activated protein C, across clinically relevant subpopulations in a randomized, phase 3, placebo-controlled study of patients with severe sepsis (recombinant human activated protein C worldwide evaluation in severe sepsis [PROWESS]). DESIGN: Univariate and multivariable analysis of prospectively defined subgroups from the PROWESS study. SETTING: A total of 164 medical centers in 11 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 1,690 patients with severe sepsis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We report observed 28-day mortality rates for drotrecogin alfa (activated) and placebo patients for subgroups prospectively defined by demographic data, surgical status, type and site of infection, and clinical and biochemical measures of disease severity. We performed subgroup analyses to explore the consistency of the mortality benefit observed in the overall population and performed tests for both quantitative and qualitative interactions. To examine the magnitude of the treatment benefit with drotrecogin alfa (activated) across the underlying predicted risk of mortality spectrum, we used stepwise logistic regression on PROWESS placebo patients to generate a predicted risk of mortality model that simultaneously included many clinical and biochemical markers of mortality risk. Because drotrecogin alfa (activated) has anticoagulant properties, we also present analyses of bleeding and thrombotic events. Actual mortality rates were lower with drotrecogin alfa (activated) compared with placebo for nearly all prospectively defined subgroups. Both univariate and multivariable regression analyses showed a consistent relative risk reduction in 28-day mortality rates for drotrecogin alfa (activated). Larger absolute risk reductions were found with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with a higher baseline predicted risk of mortality, and actual mortality rates were lower with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in all subgroups defined by disease severity measures where a > or = 20% placebo mortality was observed. Although discriminatory power was limited by few observed events, the increased absolute risk of experiencing a serious bleeding event with treatment did not seem to vary according to the baseline predicted risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) to patients with severe sepsis was associated with a significant survival benefit that tended to increase with higher baseline likelihood of death. Current data suggest that the increased risk of bleeding does not vary according to likelihood of death.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in an infant with gram-negative septic shock

The authors observed the effect of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in a case of pediatric severe sepsis. A 4-month-old male infant with Serratia marcescens septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and consumptive coagulopathy was admitted. The safety and efficacy of drotrecogin alfa (activated) has not yet been established for patients younger than 18 years of age. This is the first published report of the use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in an infant with severe sepsis. Within 6 hours of starting therapy, there was a significant improvement in hemodynamics, which was not maintained after the drotrecogin alfa (activated) infusion was temporarily discontinued. No significant bleeding complications occurred during the infusion. A brain MRI on day 22 after drotrecogin alfa (activated) infusion showed bilateral small occipital hemorrhages. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in this infant was temporally related to significant improvement. It is unknown whether the MRI brain lesions are related to severe sepsis with disseminated intravascular coagulation or drotrecogin alfa (activated) infusion. The authors believe that drotrecogin alfa (activated) should be considered in select children with life-threatening severe sepsis.     

New and emerging therapies for sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To review the recent advances related to the pathophysiology of sepsis and the rationale for recombinant human-activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa) and other antisepsis agents currently in Phase III trials. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE (1990-December 2001) search was performed to identify pertinent literature on the pathophysiology of sepsis and treatment strategies. The search was supplemented with AdisInsight (Adis International) using the search terms sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock combined with agents in Phase II or higher clinical development. Abstracts presented at infectious diseases and critical care meetings were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical efficacy studies were selected for drotrecogin alfa and other Phase III investigational agents. DATA SYNTHESIS: Our current understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis underscores the contribution of increased coagulation and diminished fibrinolytic activity working in conjunction with an excessive and dysregulated inflammatory response. The loss of homeostatic balance among these systems results in a systemic inflammatory response with generalized coagulopathy, microvascular thrombosis, and, ultimately, acute organ failure and death. As a result of these advances, several compounds are now in various phases of development. A recombinant human form of endogenous activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for severe sepsis in adults who have a high risk of death. It possesses anticoagulant, profibrinolytic, and antiinflammatory properties. Other compounds currently in Phase III trials include tissue-factor pathway inhibitor, tumor-necrosis factor antibody fragment, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, antithrombin III, and pyridoxylated hemoglobin polyoxyethylene. CONCLUSIONS: With the recent approval of drotrecogin alfa, there is renewed optimism that we can effectively reduce sepsis-associated mortality.     

The puzzle of sepsis: fitting the pieces of the inflammatory response with treatment

Sepsis is a complex syndrome characterized by simultaneous activation of inflammation and coagulation in response to microbial insult. These events manifest as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)/sepsis symptoms through release of proinflammatory cytokines, procoagulants, and adhesion molecules from immune cells and/or damaged endothelium.Conventional treatments have focused on source control, antimicrobials, vasopressors, and fluid resuscitation; however, a new treatment paradigm exists: that of treating the host response to infection with adjunct therapies including early goal directed therapy, drotrecogin alfa (activated), and immunonutrition. The multimechanistic drotrecogin alfa (activated) has been shown to reduce mortality in the severely septic patient when combined with traditional treatment. Therapies targeting improved oxygen and blood flow and reduction of apoptosis and free radicals are under investigation. Early sepsis diagnosis through detection of pro calcitonin, C reactive protein, sublingual CO2, and genetic factors may be beneficial. Ultimately, intervention timing may be the most important factor in reducing severe sepsis mortality.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis from the global open-label trial ENHANCE: further evidence for survival and safety and implications for early treatment

OBJECTIVE: To provide further evidence for the efficacy and safety of drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis. DESIGN: Single-arm, open-label, trial of drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis patients. Enrollment began in March 2001 and day-28 follow-up completed in January 2003. SETTING: ENHANCE took place in 25 countries at 361 sites. PATIENTS: Patients with known or suspected infection, three or four systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, and one or more sepsis-induced organ dysfunctions. Of 2,434 adults entered, 2,378 received drotrecogin alfa (activated), and of these, 2,375 completed the protocol. INTERVENTIONS: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) was infused at a dose of 24 mug/kg/hr for 96 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 28-day all-cause mortality approximated that observed in PROWESS (25.3% vs. 24.7%). Although patients in ENHANCE had increased serious bleeding rates compared with patients in the drotrecogin alfa (activated) arm of PROWESS (during infusion, 3.6% vs. 2.4%; postinfusion, 3.2% vs. 1.2%; 28-day, 6.5% vs. 3.5%), increased postinfusion bleeding suggested a higher background bleeding rate. Intracranial hemorrhage was more common in ENHANCE than PROWESS (during infusion, 0.6% vs. 0.2%; 28-day, 1.5% vs. 0.2%). The incidence of fatal intracranial hemorrhage was the same during infusion (0.2%) and higher at 28 days (0.5% vs. 0.2%). ENHANCE patients treated within 0-24 hrs from their first sepsis-induced organ dysfunction had lower observed mortality rate than those treated after 24 hrs (22.9% vs. 27.4%, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: ENHANCE provides supportive evidence for the favorable benefit/risk ratio observed in PROWESS and suggests that more effective use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) might be obtained by initiating therapy earlier.     

Necrotizing fasciitis due to acute perforated appendicitis: case report

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies. Accurate diagnosis is often hindered due to various presentations that differ from the typical signs of appendicitis, especially the position of the appendix. A delay in treatment increases the likelihood of complications such as perforation, which is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality rates. We herein present the case of a 76-year-old woman presenting with necrotizing fasciitis of the abdominal wall and right flank regions due to a perforated appendix. Such complication is extremely rare but life-threatening. It may be confused with cellulitis, causing a delay in aggressive treatment. This case represents an unusual complication of a common disease. Also, acute appendicitis or intra-abdominal pathologies should be taken into consideration in determining the cause of necrotizing fasciitis presenting over abdominal, flank, or perineal regions.     

Necrotizing fasciitis due to appendicitis.

Necrotizing fasciitis, although rare, is one of the more serious, life-threatening complications of missed acute appendicitis. Patients who are predisposed to developing necrotizing fasciitis, regardless of the cause, are typically immunocompromised. We present a case of a 49-year-old immunocompetent female whose diagnosis of acute appendicitis was missed and who subsequently developed necrotizing fasciitis of the abdominal wall and flank. She recovered 1 month after admission due to aggressive surgical and medical therapy.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of severe sepsis

Severe sepsis is a common and frequently fatal condition. Evidence showing a link between the coagulation system and the inflammatory response to sepsis led to the development of drotrecogin alfa (activated) as an agent in the treatment of severe sepsis. Recent studies have shown that the mode of action is actually more complex than initially thought. This recombinant form of the natural anticoagulant, activated protein C, has been demonstrated to reduce mortality in a large randomized controlled, Phase III study involving 1690 patients, even though the results of this and subsequent studies and the licensing of drotrecogin alfa (activated) have generated considerable debate. Administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding and its use is contraindicated in patients with a high risk of bleeding or recent hemorrhagic events.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of severe sepsis

Severe sepsis is a common and frequently fatal condition. Evidence showing a link between the coagulation system and the inflammatory response to sepsis led to the development of drotrecogin alfa (activated) as an agent in the treatment of severe sepsis. Recent studies have shown that the mode of action is actually more complex than initially thought. This recombinant form of the natural anticoagulant, activated protein C, has been demonsrated to reduce mortality in a large randomized controlled, Phase III study involving 1690 patients, even though the results of this and subsequent studies and the licensing of drotrecogin alfa (activated) have generated considerable debate. Administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding and its use is contraindicated in patients with a high risk of bleeding or recent hemorrhagic events.     

Adoption and de-adoption of drotrecogin alfa for severe sepsis in the United States

PurposeDrotrecogin alfa was a landmark drug for treatment of severe sepsis, yet little is known about how it was adopted and de-adopted during its 10-year period of availability.MethodsWe used hospitalization data on fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries from 2002 to 2011 to characterize trends in the use of drotrecogin alfa in the United States.ResultsDrotrecogin alfa use peaked at 5.87 per 1000 severe sepsis hospitalizations in 2003 and then steadily declined to 0.94 administrations per 1000 severe sepsis hospitalizations in 2010. Large teaching hospitals were more likely to use drotrecogin alfa than small, nonteaching hospitals. The addition of “add-on payments” to hospitals for using drotrecogin alfa in 2002 was associated with significantly increased use (P < .0001), and the withdrawal of those payments in 2004 was associated significantly decreased use (P < .0001). Neither the publication of international sepsis guidelines with favorable drotrecogin alfa recommendations (in 2004 and 2008) nor the publication of a clinical trial focused on drotrecogin alfa (in 2005) were associated with consistent changes use (P > .05).ConclusionsDrotrecogin alfa use declined over time, with marked changes in use associated with drug-specific financial incentives but not the publication of clinical practice guidelines or clinical trials.     

ADDRESS (ADministration of DRotrecogin alfa [activated] in Early stage Severe Sepsis) long-term follow-up: one-year safety and efficacy evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that drotrecogin alfa (activated) has an acceptable safety profile 1 yr from randomization. DESIGN: One-year follow-up of patients participating in a placebo-controlled clinical study of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in severe sepsis patients at low risk of death (the ADDRESS study). SETTING: The study was conducted at 516 hospitals in 34 countries. PATIENTS: The study included 2,640 patients. INTERVENTIONS: One-year follow-up was performed as an addendum to the placebo-controlled ADDRESS study. Treatment groups were compared using the chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier estimates. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Survival status at 1 yr was obtained for 90% of patients enrolled in the study (n = 2,376). The difference in mortality rate between drotrecogin alfa (activated) and placebo patients was numerically smaller at 1 yr (34.2% and 34.0%, respectively, p = .94) than at 28 days (18.5% and 17.0%, respectively, p = .34). In the subgroups defined by organ dysfunction class (single or multiple) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (<25 or >or=25), the differences in mortality rate between treatment groups at 1 yr were consistent with those observed at 28 days; no significant differences in mortality rates between treatment groups were observed. No additional serious adverse events were reported during the period between hospital discharge and 1 yr. CONCLUSIONS: No increased risk of death or evidence of harm at 1 yr was associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration in patients with severe sepsis at lower risk of death.     

Cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of severe sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapy, which was recently shown to reduce mortality in severe sepsis. DESIGN: Estimates of effectiveness and resource use were based on data collected prospectively as part of a multicenter international trial. Estimates of hospital costs were based on a subset of the patients treated in the United States (33% of all enrolled patients). Lifetime projections were modeled from published sources and tested in sensitivity analyses. Analyses were conducted from the United States societal perspective, limited to healthcare costs, and using a 3% annual discount rate. SETTING: A total of 164 medical institutions in 11 countries. PATIENTS: Adults > or = 18 yrs of age with severe sepsis INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive a 96-hr intravenous infusion of drotrecogin alfa (activated) at 24 microg/kg/hr (n = 850) or placebo (n = 840). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Base Case: incremental short-term (days 1-28) healthcare costs per day-28 survivor; Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine Reference Case: incremental lifetime healthcare costs per quality-adjusted life-year. Over the first 28 days (short-term Base Case), drotrecogin alfa (activated) increased the costs of care by $9,800 and survival by 0.061 lives saved per treated patient. Thus, drotrecogin alfa (activated) cost $160,000 per life saved (with 84.7% probability that ratio is <$250,000 per life saved). Projected to lifetime (lifetime Reference Case), drotrecogin alfa (activated) increased the costs of care by $16,000 and quality-adjusted survival by 0.33 quality-adjusted life-years per treated patient. Thus, drotrecogin alfa (activated) cost $48,800 per quality-adjusted life-year (with 82% probability that ratio is <$100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year). Estimates were generally robust to sensitivity analyses, although cost-effectiveness deteriorated to >$100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year if survivors lived <4.6 yrs on average. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) cost $27,400 per quality-adjusted life-year when limited to patients with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score > or = 25 and was cost-ineffective when limited to patients with a score <25. CONCLUSIONS: Drotrecogin alfa has a cost-effectiveness profile similar to that of many well-accepted healthcare strategies and below commonly quoted thresholds.     

Effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) on organ dysfunction in the PROWESS trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess morbidity in patients with severe sepsis managed with and without drotrecogin alfa (activated). DESIGN: Analysis of secondary end points in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial (PROWESS). SETTING: A total of 164 medical institutions in 11 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 1,690 consecutive adult patients with severe sepsis. INTERVENTIONS: A 96-hr infusion of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (human recombinant activated protein C) or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores for cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hematologic, and hepatic organ systems were measured for 28 days. Mean cardiovascular SOFA scores were significantly lower for patients treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) compared with placebo patients over this time period (p = .022). Drotrecogin alfa (activated)-treated patients also showed significantly faster resolution of cardiovascular (p = .009) and respiratory (p = .009) dysfunction and significantly slower onset of hematologic organ dysfunction (p = .041) compared with placebo patients for days 1 to 7. No significant differences in morbidity were observed between treatment groups among 28-day survivors. CONCLUSION: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) demonstrated significant improvements in organ function compared with placebo in a large phase 3 clinical trial that has shown a mortality benefit in patients with severe sepsis.     

Effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in human endotoxemia

In a phase III clinical trial, drotrecogin alfa (activated) was shown to improve survival and promote faster improvement of cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis. To further examine mechanisms involved in the action of this drug, a healthy human endotoxin model was used. Healthy volunteers (eight per group) received drotrecogin alfa (activated) or placebo intravenously for 8 h in a randomized, double-blind, controlled manner. After 2 h of study drug infusion, endotoxin (2 ng/kg) was infused and measurement of physiologic responses and biomarkers continued for 24 h. Consistent with results from severe sepsis clinical trials, drotrecogin alfa (activated) improved mean arterial pressure during the period of infusion after endotoxin exposure. In contrast to severe sepsis clinical trials using drotrecogin alfa (activated) but similar to another human endotoxin study, no significant antithrombotic, profibrinolytic, or anti-inflammatory effects were observed. These results suggest a novel role for drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the human endotoxin model.     

The Relationship Between Fluid Accumulation in Ultrasonography and the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients with Necrotizing Fasciitis

Necrotizing fasciitis is a severe soft-tissue infection with a high mortality rate. There is little literature on the relationship between the ultrasonographic finding of fluid accumulation along the deep fascia and the diagnosis and prognosis of necrotizing fasciitis. This retrospective study showed that when fluid accumulation was present along the deep fascia, patients with clinically suspected necrotizing fasciitis had a higher probability of having necrotizing fasciitis. The ultrasonographic finding of fluid accumulation with a cutoff point of more than 2 mm of depth had the best accuracy (72.7%) for diagnosing necrotizing fasciitis. In regard to the prognosis of necrotizing fasciitis, when fluid accumulation was present along the deep fascia, patients with necrotizing fasciitis had a longer length of hospital stay and were at risk of amputation or mortality. Ultrasonography is a point-of-care imaging tool that facilitates the diagnosis and prognosis of necrotizing fasciitis.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in sepsis: initial experience with patient selection, cost, and clinical outcomes

During a 1-year period, the authors examined clinical experience with drotrecogin alfa, activated for sepsis in a 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit. Drotrecogin alfa, activated was administered 46 times to 44 patients (3% of all intensive care unit admissions). Eighty-six percent of patients were on vasopressors; 95% were mechanically ventilated. Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 22.0 at admission and 21.9 during the 24 hours before drug administration. The 28-day all-cause mortality was 36.4% and hospital mortality was 43.2%, trending higher (P = .10) than in the PROWESS study, which can be attributed to clinical use in patients who would not have met PROWESS study inclusion criteria. Failure to complete a 96-hour infusion of drotrecogin alfa, activated and transfer from another hospital or nursing home before treatment were associated with poor outcome. Total cost of hospital care, including mean drotrecogin alfa, activated drug cost of 7,312 US dollars, exceeded reimbursement by a mean of 18,227 US dollars.     

Recombinant human activated protein C for use in severe sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of drotrecogin alfa (recombinant human activated protein C) in the treatment of sepsis. DATA SOURCES: Literature was identified through a MEDLINE search (1966-January 2002), the product manufacturer, and the Food and Drug Administration. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: All relevant information identified from the data sources was evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Drotrecogin alfa reduces coagulation and inflammation in septic patients. A large placebo-controlled clinical trial (n = 1690) of drotrecogin alfa in severely septic patients demonstrated a reduction in mortality (24.7% vs. 30.8%; p = 0.005), with increased bleeding risks (24.9% vs. 17.7%; p <0.001). Patients with more severe sepsis appeared to gain the most benefit. The complete clinical and economic impact of this agent requires further analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Drotrecogin alfa offers a significant advance in the treatment of severe sepsis. Judicious use in appropriate patients is necessary to control cost and maximize clinical benefits.     

The clinical evaluation committee in a large multicenter phase 3 trial of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis (PROWESS): role, methodology, and results

OBJECTIVE: In the multinational PROWESS trial, drotrecogin alfa (activated) significantly reduced mortality rate in patients with severe sepsis compared with placebo. The use of large multiple-center trials can potentially complicate interpretation of results in severe sepsis populations because of variability in medical attitudes and practices and the frequency of confounding events such as protocol violations. The objective of this study was to perform a blinded, critical, integrated review of data from the 1,690 severe sepsis patients from 164 medical centers enrolled in the PROWESS trial using a Clinical Evaluation Committee. DESIGN: Blinded, critical, integrated review of data. SETTING: Participating sites. PATIENTS: The 1,690 severe sepsis patients from 164 medical centers enrolled in the PROWESS trial. INTERVENTIONS: We performed analyses of the optimal cohort, defined as patients who had full compliance with the protocol, had evidence of an infection, and received adequate anti-infective therapy. We also performed other analyses, including significant underlying disorders, life support measures, and causes of death. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The optimal cohort of 81.4% of the intention-to-treat population [drotrecogin alfa (activated), n = 695; placebo, n = 680] had similar baseline severity of illness between the two groups, a similar pharmacodynamic effect, and a relative risk of death estimate consistent with that observed in the overall PROWESS trial (0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.99 vs. 0.806, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.94). A beneficial effect of drotrecogin alfa (activated) similarly was observed in patients with significant underlying disorders (0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.93) who were more severely ill and had a higher percentage of patients forgoing life-sustaining therapy. In contrast with the original investigator determinations, a benefit associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in urinary tract infection adjudicated by the Clinical Evaluation Committee was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The survival benefit associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) use was consistent with the results of the overall trial regardless of whether patients met criteria of the optimal cohort or had a significant underlying disorder.     

Fournier's gangrene after missed acute perforated appendicitis: A case report

Fournier''s gangrene (FG) is a rare progressive necrotizing fasciitis (NF) with high mortality rate. This case report describes a young patient with FG with no known history of disease or invasive therapeutic interventions.