The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of biphasic defibrillation waveforms and conventional monophasic defibrillation waveforms on the success of initial defibrillation, postresuscitation myocardial function and duration of survival after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: We have recently demonstrated that the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction was closely related to the magnitude of the electrical energy of the delivered defibrillation shock. In the present study, the effects of fixed 150-J low-energy biphasic waveform shocks were compared with conventional monophasic waveform shocks after prolonged VF. METHODS: Twenty anesthetized, mechanically ventilated domestic pigs were investigated. VF was induced with an AC current delivered to the right ventricular endocardium. After either 4 or 7 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation (VF), the animals were randomized for attempted defibrillation with up to three 150-J biphasic waveform shocks or conventional sequence of 200-, 300- or 360-J monophasic waveform shocks. If VF was not reversed, a 1-min interval of precordial compression preceded a second sequence of up to three shocks. The protocol was repeated until spontaneous circulation was restored or for a total of 15 min. RESULTS: Monophasic waveform defibrillation after 4 or 7 min of untreated VF resuscitated eight of 10 pigs. All 10 pigs treated with biphasic waveform defibrillation were successfully resuscitated. Transesophageal echo-Doppler, arterial pressure and heart rate measurements demonstrated significantly less impairment of cardiovascular function after biphasic defibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-energy biphasic waveform shocks were as effective as conventional higher energy monophasic waveform shocks for restoration of spontaneous circulation after 4 and 7 min of untreated VF. Significantly better postresuscitation myocardial function was observed after biphasic waveform defibrillation.     

Early Out-of-Hospital Experience with an Impedance-Compensating Low-Energy Biphasic Waveform Automatic External Defibrillator

Impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic truncated exponential(BTE) waveforms are effective in transthoracic defibrillation ofshort-duration ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, the BTE waveform hasnot been examined in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with patients inprolonged VF often associated with myocardial ischemia. The objective ofthis study was to evaluate the BTE waveform automatic externaldefibrillator (AED) in the out-of-hospital setting with long-duration VF.AEDs incorporating a 150-J BTE waveform were placed in 12 police squad carsand 4 paramedic-staffed advanced life support ambulances. AEDs were appliedto arrested patients by first-arriving personnel, whether police orparamedics. Data were obtained from PC Data Cards within the AED.Defibrillation was defined as at least transient termination of VF. Tenpatients, 64 ± 14 years, were treated for VF with BTE shocks.Another 8 patients were in nonshockable rhythms and the AEDs,appropriately, did not advise a shock. Five of the 10 VF arrests werewitnessed with a 911 call-to-shock time of 6.6 ± 1.7 minutes. VFdetection and defibrillation occurred in all 10 patients. Spontaneouscirculation was restored in 3 of 5 witnessed arrest patients and 1 survivedto discharge home. Fifty-one VF episodes were converted with 62 shocks. Presenting VF amplitude and rate were 0.43 ± 0.22 (0.13-0.86) mV and232 ± 62 (122-353) beats/min, respectively, and defibrillation wasachieved with the first shock in 7 of 10 patients. Including transientconversions, defibrillation occurred in 42 of 51 VF episodes (82%)with one BTE shock. Shock impedance was 85 ± 10 (39-138) ohms.Delivered energy and peak voltage were 152 ± 2 J and 1754 ±4 V, respectively. The average number of shocks per VF episode was 1.2± 0.5 (1-3). More than one shock was needed in only 9 episodes; nonerequired >3 shocks to defibrillate. Impedance-compensating low-energyBTE waveforms terminated VF in OHCA patients with a conversion rateexceeding that of higher energy monophasic waveforms. VF was terminated inall patients, including those with high impedance.     

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.

AIMS: It is well established in transthoracic ventricular defibrillation that biphasic truncated waveform shocks are associated with superior defibrillation efficacy when compared with damped sine wave monophasic waveform shocks. The aim of this study was to explore whether biphasic waveform shocks were superior to monophasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in whom cardioversion of AF was indicated were randomized in this prospective study, to transthoracic cardioversion with either monophasic damped sine waveform shocks or biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks. In the group randomized to monophasic waveform shocks (27 patients), a first shock of 150 J was delivered, followed (if necessary) by a 360 J shock. In the biphasic waveform group (30 patients), the first shock had an energy of 150 J and (if necessary) a second 150 J was delivered. All shocks were delivered in the anterolateral chest pad position. Sinus rhythm was restored in 16 patients (51%) with the first monophasic shock and in 27 patients (86%) with the first biphasic shock. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.02). After the second shock, sinus rhythm was obtained in a total of 24 patients (88%) with monophasic shocks and in 28 patients (93%) with biphasic shocks. No complication was observed in either group and cardiac enzymes (CK, CKmb, troponin I, myoglobin) did not show any significant changes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that at the same energy level of 150 J, biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks are superior to monophasic damped sine waveform shocks cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.     

Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks

BACKGROUND: Biphasic rectilinear shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks for transthoracic atrial defibrillation and for ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiological testing.We undertook the present study to compare the efficacy of 100 J rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks with 150 J monophasic damped sine waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation of true ventricular fibrillation during defibrillation threshold testing (DFT).The second aim of the study was to analyse the influence of patch positions on the efficacy of defibrillation. METHODS: 50 episodes of 14 patients (age ranging from 37 to 82 years) who underwent DFT testing were randomised for back-up shocks with either a sequence of 100 and 200 J biphasic waveform, or a sequence of 150 and 360 J conventional monophasic shocks. A binary search protocol was used at implantation and before hospital discharge. Patients were also randomised to an anteroposterior position versus a right-anterior-apical position. A crossover was performed between implantation and pre-hospital discharge for biphasic versus monophasic sequence as well as for the 2 different positions. RESULTS: After failed internal shocks, 27 episodes were treated with biphasic, and 23 with monophasic shocks.The first attempt by the external device did not terminate II episodes (2 biphasic, 9 monophasic).The first shock efficacy was significantly greater with biphasic than with monophasic shocks (p < 0.02).The overall success rate was 93% with biphasic shocks and 64% with monophasic shocks. In multivariate regression analysis including patch position, arrhythmia duration, type of waveform, testing order and session, only waveform was associated with successful defibrillation (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: For transthoracic defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation, low-energy rectilinear biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks.The position of the defibrillation shock pads has no influence on the biphasic shock efficacy, but anteroposterior pad position is more effective using monophasic shocks.     

A comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of biphasic defibrillation waveforms and conventional monophasic defibrillation waveforms on the success of initial defibrillation, postresuscitation myocardial function, and duration of survival after prolonged duration of untreated ventricular fibrillation (VF), including the effects of epinephrine. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, animal study. SETTING: Animal laboratory and university-affiliated research and educational institute. PARTICIPANTS: Domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: VF was induced in 20 anesthetized domestic pigs receiving mechanical ventilation. After 10 min of untreated VF, the animals were randomized. Defibrillation was attempted with up to three 150-J biphasic waveform shocks or a conventional sequence of 200-J, 300-J, and 360-J monophasic waveform shocks. When reversal of VF was unsuccessful, precordial compression was performed for 1 min, with or without administration of epinephrine. The protocol was repeated until spontaneous circulation was restored or for a maximum of 15 min. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: No significant differences in the success of initial resuscitation or in the duration of survival were observed. However, significantly less impairment of myocardial function followed biphasic shocks. Administration of epinephrine reduced the total electrical energy required for successful resuscitation with both biphasic and monophasic waveform shocks. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-energy biphasic waveform shocks were as effective as conventional higher-energy monophasic waveform shocks for restoration of spontaneous circulation after 10 min of untreated VF. Significantly better postresuscitation myocardial function was observed after biphasic waveform defibrillation. Administration of epinephrine after prolonged cardiac arrest decreased the total energy required for successful resuscitation.     

The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of biphasic truncated exponential waveform design on survival and post-resuscitation myocardial function after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: Biphasic waveforms are more effective than monophasic waveforms for successful defibrillation, but optimization of energy and current levels to minimize post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction has been largely unexplored. We examined a low-capacitance waveform typical of low-energy application (low-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEL]; 100 microF, < or =200 J) and a high-capacitance waveform typical of high-energy application (high-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEH]; 200 microF, > or =200 J). METHODS: Four groups of anesthetized 40- to 45-kg pigs were investigated. After 7 min of electrically induced VF, a 15-min resuscitation attempt was made using sequences of up to three defibrillation shocks followed by 1 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Animals were randomized to BTEL at 150 J or 200 J or to BTEH at 200 J or 360 J. RESULTS: Resuscitation was unsuccessful in three of the five animals treated with BTEH at 200 J. All other attempts were successful. Significant therapy effects were observed for survival (p = 0.035), left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), stroke volume (p < 0.001), fractional area change (p < 0.001), cardiac output (p = 0.044), and mean aortic pressure (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic outcomes were negatively associated with energy and average current but positively associated with peak current. Peak current was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum survival and minimum myocardial dysfunction were observed with the low-capacitance 150-J waveform, which delivered higher peak current while minimizing energy and average current.     

The Effects of Ventricular Fibrillation Duration and a Preceding Unsuccessful Shock on the Probability of Defibrillation Success Using Biphasic Waveforms in Pigs

Influence of VF Duration on Defibrillation Efficacy. introduction: While the defibrillation threshold has been reported to increase with ventricular fibrillation (VF) duration for monophasic waveforms, the effect of VF duration for biphasic waveforms is unknown. Methods and Results: The ED 50 requirements (the 50% probability of defibrillation success) for an endocardial lead system, which included a subcutaneous array, were determined by logistic regression using a recursive up-down algorithm for a biphasic waveform ((6/6 msec). The study was performed in two parts, each with eight pigs. In part 1, ED 50 was compared for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF and for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF following a failed first shock at 10 seconds. Energy at ED 50 decreased from 6.5 ± 0.9, J for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF to 4.9 ± 0.8, J (P < 0.01) for shocks delivered after 20 seconds. To determine if improved second shock efficacy was a result of preconditioning by the failed first shock or a function of VF duration, part 2 of the study compared defibrillation efficacy between shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF with shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF with and without a failed first shock at 10 seconds. Mean energy at ED 50 decreased from 10.1 ± 2.4, J for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF to 7.9 ± 2.4 J (P < 0.01) and 7.5 ± 3.2 J (P < 0.01) for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF with and without a failed first shock, respectively. The mean energy at KD 50 for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VK with and without a failed first shock was not significantly different (P = 0.53). A strong linear correlation for energy at ED 50 was found between shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF and shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF following a failed first shock (r = 0.95, P < 0.01). Conclusion: (1) As opposed to monophasic shocks, ED 50 is significantly lower for biphasic shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF compared with shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF in pigs. (2) An unsuccessful biphasic shock in pigs does not affect the defibrillation efficacy for a subsequent shock. (3) ED 50 for a biphasic shock delivered after 20 seconds of VK is linearly related to ED 50 for a shock delivered after 10 seconds of VK.     

Biphasic waveform external defibrillation thresholds for spontaneous ventricular fibrillation secondary to acute ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine if the defibrillation threshold (DFT) after spontaneous ventricular fibrillation (VF) secondary to acute ischemia differs from the DFT for electrically induced VF in the absence of ischemia in anesthetized, closed-chest dogs and pigs. BACKGROUND: The efficacy of external defibrillators has been tested mainly in animals and humans using E-VF, yet external defibrillators are often used in patients to halt S-VF. METHODS: Protocol 1: biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform shocks were delivered through electrodes placed in an anterior-anterior (A-A) position (left and right lateral thorax) in nine dogs. After measuring the E-VF DFT, acute ischemia was induced with an angioplasty balloon in either the left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery, and the S-VF DFT was determined. Protocol 2: in a group of 12 pigs, the E-VF DFT and S-VF DFT were determined for electrodes in the A-A position and in the anterior-posterior position (A-P). Protocol 3: the E-VF DFT was determined in seven pigs. Then up to three shocks 1.5x the E-VF DFT were delivered to S-VF. If defibrillation did not occur, a step-up protocol was used until defibrillation occurred. RESULTS: Protocol 1: the DFT for E-VF was 65 +/- 28 J (mean +/- SD) compared with 226 +/- 97 J for S-VF, p < 0.05. Protocol 2: the DFT was 152 +/- 58 J for E-VF and 315 +/- 123 J for S-VF for A-A electrodes. The DFT was 100 +/- 43 J for E-VF and 206 +/- 114 J for S-VF for A-P electrodes. Protocol 3: 11/37 shocks of strength 1.5x E-VF DFT (182 +/- 40 J) stopped the arrhythmia. The episodes of S-VF not halted by these shocks required energy levels of up to 400 J for defibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: External defibrillation of S-VF induced by acute ischemia requires significantly more energy than VF induced by 60-Hz current in the absence of ischemia. A safety margin >1.5x the DFT for electrically induced VF may be necessary in BTE external defibrillators to defibrillate S-VF.     

双相电震致心律失常性的降低及其与高效除颤的关系

双相电震比单相电震除颤更有效，但其机制未明。除颤的易损性上限（ＵＬＶ）假说认为一个无效电震是由于它再次诱发了心室颤动（ＶＦ），因此研究ＶＦ诱发的机制可能有助于理解除颤的机制。单、双相电震以电震强度（ＳＳ）与偶联间期（ＣＩ）及波形随机结合的方式施加于Ｌａｎｇｅｎｄｏｒｆ灌流的兔离体心脏上，比较心脏对单、双相电震的ＶＦ易损性。结果心脏对双相电震的反应有如下几点不同于其对单相电震的反应：①易损区（ＡＯＶ）小（８．９±４．２个区域单位ｖｓ１３．９±６．０个区域单位，Ｐ＜０．０５）。②易损区与非心律失常反应区之间的过渡区窄（１４．７±４．８个区域单位ｖｓ２９．９±６．４个区域单位，Ｐ＜０．００１）。③双相电震将整个ＡＯＶ向更长的ＣＩ移动（左边界右移了１１．０±８．８ｍｓ，右边界右移了６．０±５．２ｍｓ，Ｐ均＜０．０１）。这种双相电震致心律失常性的降低可有助进一步解释双相电震除颤阈值降低的现象。     

Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads.

Bidirectional shocks using 2 current pathways have been used in endocardial lead systems for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, but the optimal shock waveform for endocardial defibrillation is unknown. The clinical efficacy and electrical characteristics of bidirectional monophasic and biphasic shocks for endocardial cardioversion-defibrillation of fast monomorphic or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF) were evaluated. Thirty-three patients (mean age 60 +/- 12 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 34 +/- 13%) were studied. Defibrillation catheter electrodes were located in the right ventricular apex and superior vena cava/right atrial junction. A triple-electrode configuration including the 2 catheter electrodes and a left thoracic patch was used to deliver bidirectional shocks from the right ventricular cathode to an atrial anode (pathway 1) and the thoracic patch (pathway 2). The shock waveforms examined were sequential and simultaneous monophasic, and simultaneous biphasic. The efficacy of 580 V (20 J) shocks for fast monomorphic VT were comparable for the 3 waveforms (73% for sequential monophasic, 73% for simultaneous monophasic, and 100% for simultaneous biphasic). However, for polymorphic VT and VF, 580 V sequential monophasic shocks had a significantly lower efficacy (25%) than did simultaneous monophasic (75%; p = 0.01) or biphasic (89%; p less than 0.001) shocks. Single-shock defibrillation thresholds with simultaneous biphasic shocks were significantly lower (9 +/- 5 J) than were those with simultaneous monophasic shocks (15 +/- 4 J; p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Better outcome after pediatric defibrillation dosage than adult dosage in a swine model of pediatric ventricular fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare outcome after adult defibrillation dosing versus pediatric dosing in a piglet model of prolonged prehospital ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: Weight-based 2 to 4 J/kg monophasic defibrillation dosing is recommended for children in VF, but impractical for automated external defibrillator (AED) use. Present AEDs can only provide adult shock doses or newly developed attenuated adult doses intended for children. A single escalating energy sequence (50/75/86 J) of attenuated adult-dose biphasic shocks (pediatric dosing) is at least as effective as escalating monophasic weight-based dosing for prolonged VF in piglets, but this approach has not been compared to standard adult biphasic dosing. METHODS: Following 7 min of untreated VF, piglets weighing 13 to 26 kg (19 +/- 1 kg) received either biphasic 50/75/86 J (pediatric dose) or biphasic 200/300/360 J (adult dose) therapies during simulated prehospital life support. RESULTS: Return of spontaneous circulation was attained in 15 of 16 pediatric-dose piglets and 14 of 16 adult-dose piglets. Four hours postresuscitation, pediatric dosing resulted in fewer elevations of cardiac troponin T (0 of 12 piglets vs. 6 of 11 piglets, p = 0.005) and less depression of left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.05). Most importantly, more piglets survived to 24 h with good neurologic scores after pediatric shocks than adult shocks (13 of 16 piglets vs. 4 of 16 piglets, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, pediatric shocks resulted in superior outcome compared with adult shocks. These data suggest that adult defibrillation dosing may be harmful to pediatric patients with VF and support the use of attenuating electrodes with adult biphasic AEDs to defibrillate children.     

Pacing following shocks stronger than the defibrillation threshold: impact on defibrillation outcome

INTRODUCTION: A recent study of shocks near defibrillation threshold (DFT) strength demonstrated that at least three rapid cycles always occur after failed shocks but not after successful shocks, suggesting that the number and rapidity of postshock cycles are important in determining defibrillation success. To test this hypothesis, rapid pacing was performed following a shock stronger than the DFT that by itself did not induce rapid cycles and ventricular fibrillation (VF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Epicardial activation was mapped in six pigs using a 504-electrode sock. The DFT was determined by an up/down protocol with S1 shocks (right ventricle-superior vena cava, biphasic). Ten shocks that were 100 to 200 V above the DFT (aDFT) were delivered after 10 seconds of VF to confirm they always defibrillated. Then, S2, S3, etc., pacing at 5 to 10 times diastolic threshold was performed from the left ventricular apex after aDFT shocks during VF. First, the postshock interval after aDFT shocks was scanned with an S2 stimulus to find the shortest S1-S2 coupling interval (CI) that captured. This was repeated for S3, S4, etc., until VF was induced. To induce VF after aDFT shocks, three pacing stimuli (S2, S3, S4) with progressively shorter CIs were always required; S2 or S2,S3 never induced VF. For the S2-S4 cycles, the intercycle interval was shorter (P < 0.01), and the wavefront conduction time was longer (P < 0.01) for episodes in which VF was induced (n = 57) than for episodes in which it was not (n = 60). Following the S4 cycle that induced VF, two types of spontaneous activation patterns appeared: focal (88%) and reentrant (12%). CONCLUSION: VF induction after aDFT shocks always required at least three rapid successive paced-induced cycles. Thus, the number and rapidity of the first several postshock cycles rather than just the first postshock cycle may be determining factors for defibrillation outcome.     

Termination of spiral waves with biphasic shocks: role of virtual electrode polarization

INTRODUCTION: This simulation study seeks to extend the virtual electrode polarization (VEP) theory for defibrillation to explain the success and failure of biphasic shocks. The goals of the study are to (1) provide insight into why optimal biphasic shocks have a lower voltage defibrillation threshold than monophasic shocks, (2) examine the mechanisms of biphasic shock failure and to determine whether they differ from those of monophasic shocks, and (3) study how the timing of biphasic shock delivery to a spiral wave affects voltage defibrillation threshold. METHODS AND RESULTS: A spiral wave is initiated in a bidomain representation of a 2-cm x 2-cm sheet of ventricular myocardium. The model incorporates nonuniform fiber curvature, membrane kinetics suitable for high-strength shocks, and electroporation. A spatially uniform extracellular field is delivered by line electrodes. The shock establishes VEP that dictates the postshock activity in the tissue. Our results demonstrate that the second phase of biphasic shocks leaves the tissue with substantially smaller postshock excitable gap, thus eliminating the majority of the substrate for reinitiation of reentrant activity. Further, the occurrence of break excitations for weaker biphasic shocks indicates that the mechanisms for biphasic shock failure are more complex than for monophasic shocks. Biphasic voltage defibrillation thresholds range from 8 to 16 V/cm, depending on the position of the spiral wave. An increase in the amount of preshock excitable gap leads to an increase in voltage defibrillation threshold. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the importance of VEP and its interaction with preshock activity in the success and failure of biphasic defibrillation shocks.     

Biphasic versus monophasic cardioversion in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation:

Biphasic versus Monophasic Cardioversion. INTRODUCTION: Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using monophasic transthoracic shocks occasionally is ineffective. Biphasic cardioversion requires less energy than monophasic cardioversion, but its efficacy in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation is unknown. Thus, we compared the efficacy of cardioversion using biphasic versus monophasic waveform shocks in patients with atrial fibrillation previously refractory to monophasic cardioversion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with prior failed monophasic cardioversion were randomized to either a 360-J monophasic damped sinusoidal shock or biphasic truncated exponential shocks at 150 J, followed by 200 J and then 360 J, if necessary. If either waveform failed, patients were crossed over to the other waveform. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients achieving sinus rhythm following initial randomized therapy. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression examined independent predictors of shock success, including patient age, sex, left atrial diameter, body mass index, drug therapy, and waveform. Twenty-eight patients were randomized to the biphasic shocks and 28 to the monophasic shocks. Sinus rhythm was restored in 61% of patients with biphasic versus 18% with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001). Seventy-eight percent success was achieved in patients who crossed over to the biphasic shock after failing monophasic cardioversion, whereas only 33% were successfully cardioverted with a monophasic shock after crossover from biphasic shock (P = 0.02). Overall, 69% of patients who received a biphasic shock at any point in the protocol were cardioverted successfully, compared to 21% with the monophasic shock (P < 0.0001). The type of shock was the strongest predictor of shock success (P = 0.0001) in multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSION: An ascending sequence of 150-, 200-, and 360-J transthoracic biphasic cardioversion shocks are successful more often than a single 360-J monophasic shock. Thus, biphasic shocks should be the recommended configuration of choice for all cardioversions.     

Immediate countershock versus cardiopulmonary resuscitation before countershock in a 5-minute swine model of ventricular fibrillation arrest

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Prior laboratory and clinical studies demonstrate that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preceding countershock of prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) increases the likelihood of successful cardiac resuscitation. The lower limit of VF duration at which time preshock CPR provides no benefit has not been specifically studied. The purpose of this study was to compare countershock and cardiac resuscitation outcome between immediate countershock of VF of 5-minute duration and CPR without drug therapy before countershock in a swine model. METHODS: VF was induced in anesthetized and instrumented swine. After 5 minutes of VF, animals received 1 of 2 treatments. Animals in group 1, a "historical" control group (n=20), received immediate countershock followed by CPR and repeated shocks if needed. Group 2 animals (n=11) received CPR for 90 seconds preceding countershock, then continued CPR and repeated countershock if necessary. Drugs were not administered to either group, and resuscitation efforts were discontinued if a perfusing rhythm was not restored within 10 minutes of the first countershock. First shock success rate (defined as termination of VF), the number of shocks required to terminate VF, and the cardiac resuscitation rate were compared between groups. RESULTS: The first shock terminated VF in 13 of 20 group 1 animals and 2 of 11 group 2 animals (P =.023). All but 1 animal in group 1 developed pulseless electrical activity after countershock. All but 1 animal in group 1 were eventually successfully resuscitated with CPR and repeated shocks if necessary. Four group 2 animals could not be resuscitated (P =.042). CONCLUSION: Although effective in improving outcome of prolonged VF, CPR preceding countershock of VF of 5-minute duration does not improve the response to the first shock, decrease the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity, or the rate of return of circulation. In this study, CPR preceding countershock resulted in a significantly lower cardiac resuscitation rate.     

Prospective, randomized comparison of two biphasic waveforms for the efficacy and safety of transthoracic biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in commercially available biphasic waveforms. BACKGROUND: Although the superiority of biphasic over monophasic waveforms for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is established, the relative efficacy of available biphasic waveforms is less clear. METHODS: We compared the effectiveness of a biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a biphasic rectilinear (BR) waveform for external cardioversion of AF. Patients (N = 188) with AF were randomized to receive transthoracic BR shocks (50, 75, 100, 120, 150, 200 J) or BTE shocks (50, 70, 100, 125, 150, 200, 300, 360 J). Shock strength was escalated until success or maximum energy dose was achieved. If maximum shock strength failed, patients received the maximum shock of the opposite waveform. Analysis included 141 patients (71 BR, 70 BTE; mean age 66.5 +/- 13.7. Forty-seven randomized patients were excluded because of flutter on precardioversion ECG upon blinded review (n = 25), presence of intracardiac thrombus (n = 7), or protocol deviation (n = 15). Groups were similar with regard to clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. RESULTS: The success rate was similar for the two waveforms (93% BR vs 97 BTE, P = .44), although cumulative selected and delivered energy was less in the BTE group. Only AF duration was significantly different between successful and unsuccessful patients. No significant complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic waveforms were very effective in transthoracic cardioversion of AF, and complication rates were low. No significant difference in efficacy was observed between BR and BTE waveforms. Impedance was not an important determinant of success for either biphasic waveform.     

Reentry site during fibrillation induction in relation to defibrillation efficacy for different shock waveforms

INTRODUCTION: Unsuccessful defibrillation shocks may reinitiate fibrillation by causing postshock reentry. METHODS AND RESULTS: To better understand why some waveforms are more efficacious for defibrillation, reentry was induced in six dogs with 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-msec monophasic and 1/1- (both phases 1 msec) 2/2-, 4/4-, and 8/8-msec biphasic shocks. Reentry was initiated by 141+/-15 V shocks delivered from a defibrillator with a 150-microF capacitance during the vulnerable period of paced rhythm (183+/-12 msec after the last pacing stimulus). The shock potential gradient field was orthogonal to the dispersion of refractoriness. Activation was mapped with 121 electrodes covering 4 x 4 cm of the right ventricular epicardium, and potential gradient and degree of recovery of excitability were estimated at the sites of reentry. Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were estimated by an up-down protocol for the same nine waveforms in eight dogs internally and in nine other dogs externally. DFT voltages for the different waveforms were positively correlated with the magnitude of shock potential gradient and negatively correlated with the recovery interval at the site at which reentry was induced by the waveform during paced rhythm for both internal (DFT = 1719 + 64.5VV - 11.1RI; R2 = 0.93) and external defibrillation (DFT = 3445 + 150VV - 22RI; R2 = 0.93). CONCLUSION: The defibrillation waveforms with the lowest DFTs were those that induced reentry at sites of low shock potential gradient, indicating efficacious stimulation of myocardium. Additionally, the site of reentry induced by waveforms with the lowest DFTs was in myocardium that was more highly recovered just before the shock, perhaps because this high degree of recovery seldom occurs during defibrillation due to the rapid activation rate during fibrillation.     

Low-Energy Impedance-Compensating Biphasic Waveforms Terminate Ventricular Fibrillation at High Rates in Victims of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation. Introduction : New automatic external defibrillators (AEDs), which are smaller, lighter, easier to use, and less costly make the goal of widespread AED deployment and early defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest feasible. The objective of this study was to observe the performance of a low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveform in the out-of-hospital setting on 100 consecutive victims of sudden cardiac arrest.
Methods and Results : AEDs incorporating a 150-J impedance-compensating biphasic waveform were used by 12 EMS systems. Data were obtained from the AED PC card reporting system. Defibrillation was defined as conversion to an organized rhythm or to asystole. Endpoints included: defibrillation efficacy for ventricular fibrillation (VE); restoration of an organized rhythm at the time of patient transfer to an advanced life support (ALS) team or to the emergency department (ED); and time from AED power-on to first defibrillation. The AED correctly identified 44 of 100 patients presenting in VE as requiring a shock (100% sensitivity) and 56 of 100 patients not in VF as not requiring a shock (100% specificity). The time from 911 call to first shock delivery averaged 8.1 ± 3.0 minutes. A single 150-J biphasic shock defibrillated the initial VE episode in 39 of 44 (89%) patients. The average time from power-on to first defibrillation was 25 ± 17 seconds. At patient transfer to ALS or ED care, an organized rhythm was present in 34 of 44 (77%) patients presenting with VF. Asystole was present in 7 (16%) and VE in 3 (7%).
Conclusions : Low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveforms terminate long-duration VE at high rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Use of this waveform allows AED device characteristics consistent with widespread AED deployment and early defibrillation.     

Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms

A reduction in the shock strength required for defibrillation would allow use of a smaller automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and would reduce the possibility of myocardial damage by the shock. Most internal defibrillation electrodes require 5 to 25 J for successful defibrillation in human beings and in dogs. In an attempt to lower the shock strength needed for defibrillation, we designed two large titanium defibrillation patch electrodes that were contoured to fit over the right and left ventricles of the dog heart, covering areas of approximately 33 and 39 cm2, respectively. In six anesthetized open-chest dogs, the electrodes were secured directly to the epicardium and ventricular fibrillation was induced by 60 Hz alternating current. Truncated exponential monophasic and biphasic shocks were given 10 sec later and defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were determined. The DFT was 159 +/- 48 V, 3.2 +/- 1.9 J (mean +/- SD) for 10 msec monophasic shocks and 106 +/- 22 V, 1.3 +/- 0.4 J, for biphasic shocks with both phase durations equal to 5 msec (5-5 msec). The experiment was repeated in another six dogs in which the electrodes were secured to the pericardium. The mean DFT was not significantly higher than that for the electrodes on the epicardium: 165 +/- 27 V, 3.1 +/- 1.2 J for 10 msec monophasic shocks and 116 +/- 19 V, 1.6 +/- 0.5 J for 5-5 msec biphasic shocks. Low DFTs were also obtained with biphasic shocks in which the duration of the first phase was longer than that of the second.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Delayed afterdepolarization inhibitor: a potential pharmacologic intervention to improve defibrillation efficacy

INTRODUCTION: Electrical and optical mapping studies of defibrillation have demonstrated that following shocks of strength near the defibrillation threshold (DFT), the first several postshock cycles always arise focally. No immediate postshock reentry was observed. Delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) have been suggested as a possible cause of this rapid repetitive postshock activity. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that DFT is decreased by application of a DAD inhibitor. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six pigs (30-35 kg) were studied. First, control DFT was determined using a three-reversal up/down protocol. Each shock (RV-SVC, biphasic, 6/4 msec) was delivered after 10 seconds of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Then, flunarizine (a DAD inhibitor) was injected intravenously (2 mg/kg bolus and 4 mg/kg/hour maintenance) and the DFT was again determined. A third DFT was determined 50 minutes after drug infusion was terminated to allow the drug to wash out. DFT after flunarizine application (520 +/- 90 V, 14 +/- 3 J) was significantly lower than control DFT (663 +/- 133 V, 23 +/- 4 J). After the drug washed out, DFT (653 +/- 107 V, 22 +/- 4 J) returned to the control DFT value (P = 0.6). Flunarizine reduced the DFT approximately 22% by leading-edge voltage and approximately 40% by energy. CONCLUSION: Flunarizine, a DAD inhibitor, significantly improved defibrillation efficacy. This finding suggests that DADs could be the source of the rapid repetitive focal activation cycles arising after failed near-DFT shocks before degeneration back into VF. Future studies are needed to investigate the cause of the earliest postshock activation and to determine if the DADs are responsible.