The use of forearm free fillet flap in traumatic upper extremity amputations

Background: Complete traumatic upper extremity avulsions are an infrequent but devastating injury. These injuries are usually the result of massive blunt trauma to the upper limb. Intact issue from amputated or nonsalvageable limbs may be transferred for reconstruction of complex defects resulting from trauma when the indications for replantation are not met. This strategy allows preservation of stump length or coverage of exposed joints, and provides free flap harvest for reconstruction without additional donor‐site morbidity. Methods: A retrospective review at São João Hospital was performed on seven patients who had undergone immediate reconstruction with forearm free fillet flaps between 1992 and 2007. Results: There were six men and one woman, with patient age ranging from 17 to 74 years (mean, 41 years). Amputation sites were at the humeral neck (n = 1), at the humeral shaft (n = 5), and below the elbow (n = 1). The area of the forearm free fillet flap skin paddle was 352.14 ± 145.48 cm (mean ± SD). The two major complications were the flap loss and the patient death on postoperative day 3 in other case. The postoperative course in the remaining five cases was uneventful with good healing of the wounds. Minor complications included two small residual defects treated by split‐thickness skin grafting and one wound infection requiring drainage and revision. Conclusions: The forearm free fillet flap harvested from the amputated limb provides reliable and robust tissue for reconstruction of large defects of the residual limb without additional donor‐site morbidity. Microsurgical free fillet flap transfer to amputation sites is valuable for achieving wound closure, improving stump durability, and maximizing function via preservation of length. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2009.     

Emergency free flaps to the upper extremity

Thirty-one emergency free flaps were applied to the upper extremities of patients who ranged in age from 16 to 57 years. The size of the skin defects ranged from 13 to 540 square centimeters, with an average of 145 square centimeters. A variety of flaps were used, including 14 lateral arm, seven groin, five latissimus, three first web space of the foot, one scapular and one medial arm. In patients with small defects, the operative time ranged from 3 to 9 hours, with an average of 4 hours and 54 minutes. The hospital stay was never longer than 4 days. In patients with medium size defects, the operating time ranged from 3 to 18 hours, with an average of 7 hours and 45 minutes. The hospital stay averaged 7.4 days. In large defects in which extensive reconstruction was undertaken before flap application, the operative time ranged from 3 to 20 hours, with an average of 11 hours and 54 minutes. The average hospital stay was 11.8 days. Twenty-nine of the 31 flaps survived in their entirety (93.5%). In one of the successful flaps (3.2%), exploration was required after the patient left the operating room. Severe infection occurred in only one case, that being one of the two flap failures. Twenty-seven of the 31 patients returned to work, 18 of them to their original employment.     

Immediate amputation stump coverage with forearm free flaps from the same limb

When the traumatic amputation level or the degree of damage to the arm or forearm does not justify reimplantation of the severed part there may be sufficient undamaged skin to be used as a free flap to resurface the arm or the stump. Stump length or the elbow joint may thus be preserved and more durable skin cover for the fitting of a prosthesis may be obtained. A "spare-parts" forearm free flap may be raised on the radial or ulnar vessels or both. Three cases are reported.     

Finger pulp reconstruction with free flaps from the upper extremity

Although never exceeding a few square centimeters, finger pulp defects are reconstructive challenges due to their special requirements and lack of neighboring tissue reserve. Local flaps are the common choice in the management of this injury. However, the development of microsurgery and clinical practice have greatly boosted the application of different free flaps for finger pulp reconstruction with excellent results, especially when local flaps are unsuitable or impossible for the coverage of large pulp defects. These flaps are all located in the same operation field and can be performed under one tourniquet; therefore, they are more convenient with better patients' compliance in clinical setting. Nonetheless, there is still no consensus about which type of these flaps should be preferred among various finger pulp reconstructive options. In this article, we attempt to review articles describing finger pulp reconstruction using free flaps from the upper extremity from the literature. We summarize the clinical applications of these free flaps and detail their advantages and drawbacks, respectively. The algorithm of flap selection for finger pulp reconstruction based on our experience and literature review is also discussed.     

Cross-arm replantation for traumatic bilateral upper extremity amputations: a case report

A 40-year-old woman had her right extremity avulsed at the proximal upper arm level and the wrist and hand of her left extremity irretrievably injured in a traffic accident. The right distal forearm was surgically amputated and replanted onto the stump of the left distal forearm. New strategy for nerve repair was applied and the function recovery of the cross-replanted hand was favorable. We thought that cross-extremity replantation was indicated when the patient suffered from bilateral total or subtotal amputation at different levels and orthotopic replantation was impossible.     

Characterisation and outcomes of upper extremity amputations

Background

The purpose of this study is to characterise the injuries, outcomes, and disabling conditions of the isolated, combat-related upper extremity amputees in comparison to the isolated lower extremity amputees and the general amputee population.

Methods

A retrospective study of all major extremity amputations sustained by the US military service members from 1 October 2001 to 30 July 2011 was conducted. Data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application, and the Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Offices were queried in order to obtain injury characteristics, demographic information, treatment characteristics, and disability outcome data.

Results

A total of 1315 service members who sustained 1631 amputations were identified; of these, 173 service members were identified as sustaining an isolated upper extremity amputation. Isolated upper extremity and isolated lower extremity amputees had similar Injury Severity Scores (21 vs. 20). There were significantly more non-battle-related upper extremity amputees than the analysed general amputation population (39% vs. 14%). Isolated upper extremity amputees had significantly greater combined disability rating (82.9% vs. 62.3%) and were more likely to receive a disability rating >80% (69% vs. 53%). No upper extremity amputees were found fit for duty; only 12 (8.3%) were allowed continuation on active duty; and significantly more upper extremity amputees were permanently retired than lower extremity amputees (82% vs. 74%). The most common non-upper extremity amputation-related disabling condition was post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (17%). Upper extremity amputees were significantly more likely to have disability from PTSD, 13% vs. 8%, and loss of nerve function, 11% vs. 6%, than the general amputee population.

Discussion/conclusion

Upper extremity amputees account for 14% of all amputees during the Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom conflicts. These amputees have significant disability and are unable to return to duty. Much of this disability is from their amputation; however, other conditions greatly contribute to their morbidity.     

Preservation of lower extremity amputation length using muscle perforator free flaps.

Coverage of any lower extremity amputation stump must be durable to resist external forces, well contoured, and thin enough for proper shoewear or prothesis fitting. Preservation of bone length to maximise the ability to ambulate is also of paramount importance. If local soft tissues are inadequate to fulfil these prerequisites, consideration of a microsurgical tissue transfer is a reasonable option, especially to cover bone or save a major joint. Muscle perforator free flaps, as shown in this series of eight patients using four different donor sites, are a versatile alternative for the necessary soft tissue augmentation. Multiple choices are available and often even from the involved lower extremity to minimise further morbidity. The vascular pedicles of this genré of flaps are relatively exceedingly long and of respectable calibre to facilitate reaching an appropriate recipient site. They can be sensate if desired. Of course, muscle function is by definition preserved. Complications are minimal and usually related to the reason for the amputation in the first place.     

Forearm arterial loop as an expedient source for inflow to upper extremity free flaps

Challenging wounds of the upper extremity requiring free tissue transfers are relatively infrequent. As a direct consequence, methods to access recipient vessels or acceptable alternatives may not be as familiar as in the lower extremity. In rare circumstances, creation of an arterial loop by elevation of a portion of either major forearm artery provides an easily accessible, pristine source of inflow for a planned free flap matching vessels of comparable caliber. Such a maneuver may also be important to ensure preservation of optimal hand function by avoiding any dissection in the vicinity of essential musculotendinous and neurovascular structures that might reside within or adjacent to the zone of injury. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Indications and selection of free flaps for soft tissue coverage of the upper extremity

The advantages of free flap coverage of the upper extremity following trauma or tumor resection have been acknowledged by several authors. Most importantly, these benefits include the ability to provide early coverage with composite reconstruction of all damaged or missing tissues and early mobilization to restore function. The purpose of this article is to review the indications and options for selection of free flaps for soft tissue coverage of the upper extremity.     

Free fillet flap application to cover forequarter or traumatic amputation of an upper extremity: A case report

Reusing tissue of amputated or unsalvageable limbs to reconstruct soft tissue defects is one aspect of the “spare parts concept.” Using a free fillet flap in such situations enables the successful formation of a proximal stump with the length needed to cover a large defect from forequarter amputation without risking additional donor‐site morbidity. The use of free fillet flaps for reconstruction after forequarter and traumatic upper extremity amputations is illustrated here in a case report. A 41‐year old patient required a forequarter amputation to resect a desmoid tumor, resulting in an extensive soft‐tissue defect of the upper extremity. A free fillet flap of the amputated arm and an additional local epaulette flap were used to reconstruct the defect. At 9 months after the procedure, a satisfactory result with a very well healed flap was attained. Free fillet flaps can be used successfully for reconstruction of large upper extremity defects, without risking additional donor‐site morbidity. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:700–704, 2016.     

Reconstruction of traumatic and non-traumatic lower extremity defects with local or free flaps

European Surgery - Despite continuous surgical advances, reconstruction of complex lower extremity wounds remains challenging. The indication of local flaps or microsurgical free tissue transfer...     

Use of pedicled radial forearm flaps for covering of extensive soft tissue defects in the upper extremity]

Results of treatment of 13 patients with extensive defects of soft tissues in the upper extremities treated with pedicled radial forearm flaps are presented (11 fascio-cutaneous flaps and 2 adiposo-cutaneous). The group included 5 females and 8 males aged 9-85 years (mean age: 37 years). The defects followed trauma in 12 cases and in one case it was the result of oncological resection. The flap was used as a primary procedure in 4 cases after amputation of the finger or degloving of the hand. The flap appeared very useful in delayed reconstructions in older patients with extensive defects of soft tissues and bones, especially in the elbow region. Complete survival of all flaps with very good late results were obtained. Donor sites were covered with skin grafts and healed correctly in 11 patients. In two patients healing of the donor site prolonged in time for over 6 weeks. No other complications were observed using this method.     

Management of the upper extremity in traumatic tetraplegia

The management of the upper extremity in traumatic tetraplegia is complex and extremely important for the rehabilitation of the patient. The evolution of present management is reviewed. The evaluation and classification of the tetraplegic patient is discussed with general recommendations for treatment.     

游离髂骨皮瓣在前臂复杂性外伤中的应用

我们自1999年以来，急症采用以旋髂深动脉为蒂的髂骨皮瓣修复此类创伤9例，取得良好效果，现介绍如下。