Is the Size of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Associated with Coagulopathy?

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) volume and intraluminal thrombi were analyzed with respect to the number and function of platelets, blood cells, and coagulation factors. A group of 43 patients who underwent repair of an AAA were enrolled in this study. The maximum diameter and volume of the AAA, and the volume of intraluminal thrombi and lumen were measured by computed tomography with planimetry. The platelet count and platelet function, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, plasminogen, antithrombin 3, fibrin degradation products (FDP), D-dimer, and blood cell counts were measured. Spontaneous platelet aggregation and the FDP, and D-dimer levels were elevated; all other factors remained within the normal range. Intraluminal thrombus volume was strongly correlated with the volume and diameter of the AAA. However, no correlation was observed between the size of the AAA and coagulating factors, including the number and aggregation value of platelets. AAAs are frequently associated with a coagulating disorder. However, its size and thrombus volume are not correlated with coagulation changes. Although an intraluminal thrornbus increases along with fee enlargement of the AAA, the clinical manifestation of bleeding is rarely associated with an AAA. Therefore coagulopathy in patients with an AAA is not fully explained by its morphology.     

Are we Ignoring the Importance of Ankle Pressures in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: the ankle/brachial pressure index (ABPI) has been shown to be a reliable marker of cardiovascular risk in population studies. We investigated whether the ABPI was a useful prognostic index for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: patients entered into the U.K. Small Aneurysm Trial and Study had their ABPI measured in both legs at baseline (mean ABPI reported) and were followed up until 30 June 1998, with information about cause of death being obtained from the Office of National Statistics. This study focussed on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: a total of 1827 men and 478 women, mean age 69 years, median aneurysm diameter 4.4 cm, were followed up for a median of 5.7 years. A total of 829 deaths were reported (rate 8.1 per 100 person-years), 546 (66%) from cardiovascular causes. The all-cause mortality risk increased as the ABPI decreased, hazard ratio 1.25 per 0.2 unit decrease in ABPI (95% CI 1.17 to 1.34, p<0.001). For patients in the lowest tertile group (ABPI <0.87) there were 11.6 deaths per 100 person-years. This increased risk persisted after adjustment for age, sex, evidence of ischaemia on resting ECG and initial aneurysm diameter, adjusted hazard ratio 1.17 per 0.2 unit decrease in ABPI (95% CI 1.07 to 1.28, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: the ankle/brachial pressure index is an important prognostic indicator for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Patients with an ABPI below 0.87 (limit of lowest tertile) have the highest mortality risk and best clinical practice demands that attention is focussed on active treatment to minimise their cardiovascular risk factors.     

Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Is It Possible to Predict Survival?

The aim of the study was to determine variables that could be used to predict survival in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) and to assess the accuracy of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS) and the Acute Physiology Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II). From January 1998 to July 2006, 103 patients underwent operations for RAAA. For each patient, 44 variables were retrospectively recorded in a database. Data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate methods. In the univariate analysis significant predictors of death were hypotension (p=0.001), preexisting peripheral vascular disease (p<0.001), renal insufficiency (p=0.037), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p=0.028), level of HCO(3)(-) (p<0.001), intraperitoneal rupture (p=0.001), blood transfused (p<0.001), cardiac complications (p<0.001), and APACHE-II score (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed statistical significance for coexisting peripheral vascular disease (p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure at admission <60 mm Hg (p=0.039), APACHE-II score >18.5 (p=0.025), HCO(3)(-) <21 mg/dL (p<0.001), and intraperitoneal rupture of the aneurysm (p=0.011) as predictors of death. Results of the study suggested that different factors can be helpful in identifying those patients whose operative risk is prohibitive. APACHE-II, contrary to GAS, is an accurate system to predict postoperative death after repair for RAAA.     

What Determines and Are the Consequences of Surveillance Intensity after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair?

Follow-up examinations are advised 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and yearly thereafter by the European Collaborating Group on Stent-Graft Techniques for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EUROSTAR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the determinants and consequences of surveillance completeness. Patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between October 1996 and August 2004 and enrolled in the EUROSTAR registry were analyzed. Two groups were compared: patients who attended all scheduled visits (group A) and those who came infrequently (group B). Odds ratios and hazard rates (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined to detect which patient characteristics and complications were associated with follow-up intensity. Of the 4,433 patients, 1,538 (35%) attended all scheduled visits until the end of follow-up (group A). Analysis of patient characteristics demonstrated that intensive visitors were more often smokers, hyperlipemic, and considered unfit for open surgery or general anesthesia. Complications during follow-up, including endoleaks (24% vs. 20%), kinking (3.5% vs. 2.5%), and migration (4.9% vs. 3.5%), appeared significantly more frequently in group A. Despite intensive follow-up of this category, still a greater proportion died (12% vs. 9%, adjusted HR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8). After 84 months of follow-up, the cumulative survival rates in groups A and B were 71% and 74%, respectively (p < 0.0001). It seems that follow-up intensity was based on baseline patient characteristics. High-risk patients had, despite more intensive surveillance, still more complications after adjustment for patient, morphological, and center-specific characteristics. Further assessment is indicated to evaluate the effectiveness of different frequencies of surveillance visits.     

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair or Open Surgery for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Involvement of Both Common Iliac Arteries ?

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) involving the entire common iliac arteries requires proximal coil embolisation of both internal iliac arteries and extension of the stent graft into the external iliac arteries (type E according to the Eurostar classification). A potential complication of this treatment is pelvic ischemia. Therefore, this type of aneurysm is a relative contra-indication for EVAR.

In this case-report we describe a hybrid procedure preserving antegrade circulation in one of the internal iliac arteries in a patient with a type E aneurysm who was unfit for open surgery.