首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy with continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in a monthly regimen is one of the standard treatments for advanced gastric carcinoma. This study evaluated the new LV5FU2-P regimen, designed to improve efficacy and tolerance of the 5-FU plus cisplatin combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinoma were prospectively included in the study. They were treated every 14 days with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2 plus folinic acid 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 2, plus bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 and 2, plus continuous 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day as a 22-h i.v. infusion on days 1 and 2. Ten patients received a simplified regimen (folinic acid 40 mg/m(2) day 1 + bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) day 1 + continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2). RESULTS: All the patients were assessable for response and 42 for toxicity. One patient achieved a complete response and 15 a partial response, for an overall response rate of 37.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1% to 52.3%]. The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.4-10.9) and the overall survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 10.1-16.4). There were no treatment-related deaths. Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most common severe toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: LV5FU2-P is an active and well tolerated regimen in the treatment of advanced gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinomas. It warrants evaluation comparatively with other active regimens.  相似文献   

2.
BACKGROUND: Although combination therapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin for the treatment of gastric cancer has been reported, no consistent regimen has been established. Our aim was to determine the optimal treatment schedule of this therapy, for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy consisting of intermittent 5-FU and low-dose cisplatin in 26 patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. The treatment cycle consisted of intravenous cisplatin at 3.3 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days. 5-FU was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion at 300-500 mg/body every other day (days 1, 3, 5) for 4 weeks. RESULTS: The partial response rate was 34.6%. The median survival duration was 12.8 months and the one-year survival was 53.1%. There were a few adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that this mode of combination therapy led to a fairly favorable outcome for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.  相似文献   

3.
 目的 评价以紫杉醇(TAX)联合顺铂(DDP)、亚叶酸钙(CF)、5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)持续滴注治疗晚期胃癌的疗效。方法 39例均为经病理学证实的胃癌患者,接受以TAX为主的联合化疗:TAX 135 mg/m2,静脉滴注3 h,第1天;DDP 30 mg/m2+生理盐水500 ml,静脉滴注,第2 ~ 4天;CF 200 mg/m2 +5 %葡萄糖注射液250 ml,静脉滴注2 h,第2 ~ 3天;5-Fu 400 mg/m2静脉推注10 min,再接5-Fu 2 g/m2用输液泵连续滴注48 h,21 d为1周期。所有患者至少接受2个周期治疗。结果 39例患者中除1例因过敏反应停药外,其余38例CR3例,占7.8 %,总有效率55.2 %。主要毒副反应为骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐、腹泻、口腔黏膜炎、脱发和关节肌肉痛,但均可耐受。结论 TAX、DDP联合CF+5-Fu持续静脉滴注治疗晚期胃癌有较好的临床治疗效果,毒性可以耐受。  相似文献   

4.
Four categories of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with different regimens of chemotherapy: (1) PF cisplatin 100 mg/m2/day+5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2/day intravenous infusion (100 hrs); (2) carboplatin (AUC5)+5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2/day intravenous infusion (2 hrs), days 1-3; (3) DCF, and (4) bevacizumab+PF.  相似文献   

5.
We performed combination chemotherapy adapted to chronotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, mitomycin C and cisplatin in 11 patients with gastric cancer and 7 with colorectal cancer. Treatment consisted of a 5-day course of continuous arterial or intravenous infusion of 5-FU (500 mg/body/day), arterial or intravenous infusion of leucovorin (20 mg/body/day) at 6:00 p.m. on days 1-5, arterial or intravenous infusion of mitomycin C (2 mg/body) at 9:00 a. m. on day 5, and arterial or intravenous infusion of cisplatin (20-80 mg/body) at 6:00 p.m. on day 5. The effective rate against gastric cancer was 73%; however, the effective rate against colorectal cancer was 29%. During and after this therapy, there was only a little appetite loss, nausea and stomatitis.  相似文献   

6.
PURPOSE: Resistance to topoisomerase (TOP) 1 and 2 inhibitors is a potentially important reason for treatment failure, and may be related, in part, to a down-regulation of the specific TOP target. Investigators in our laboratories previously noted such a down-regulation of the target, along with a reciprocal up-regulation of the alternate TOP. Therefore, sequencing TOP inhibitors may provide a means for overcoming resistance to the TOP I and II inhibitors. Furthermore, point mutations in TOP I, which confer resistance to TOP I inhibitors, were associated with collateral sensitivity to cisplatin. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A dose escalating Phase I trial of topotecan (at doses of 0.75 to 1.0 mg/m(2)/day) on days 1 to 3 with etoposide (70-80 mg/m(2)/day) and cisplatin (20-25 mg/m(2)/day) on days 8 to 10. The timing of the drug sequence was based on the prior Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of camptothecin and etoposide, and the level of the TOP targets in peripheral blood monocytes. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (7 males and 8 females) received 40 courses of therapy across three dose levels. The median age was 56 (range, 39-77), and the median performance status was 1 (range, 0-2). The diagnoses included: non-small cell lung cancer (7), head and neck cancer (2), cancer of unknown primary (2), and 1 each of ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, gastric cancer, and renal cancer. Level 1 (topotecan 1.0 mg/m(2)/day; etoposide 80 mg/m(2)/day; and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2)/day) produced severe and prolonged febrile neutropenia in the first patient treated, and the subsequent patients were then entered onto a reduced dose level (cohort 2: topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2)/day; etoposide 70 mg/m(2)/day; and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day). Three of 6 patients on cohort 2 experienced grade IV neutropenia >5 days, and a decision was then made to add filgrastim at 5 micro g/kg rather than additionally reduce the dosages (cohort 3). Eight patients were then treated on cohort 3, and 1 of the 8 patients experienced a grade 4 neutropenia. Thus, cohort level three was considered the recommended dose for Phase II studies. Twelve of the 15 patients had disease assessable for response to therapy. Seven achieved stable disease for >/==" BORDER="0">2 months, whereas 5 showed continued progression of their disease. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that sequencing TOP 1 and 2 inhibitors is feasible, and topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2)/day days 1-3; etoposide 70 mg/m(2)/day days 8-10; and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day days 8-10 with filgrastim at 5 micro g/kg is an appropriate dose and schedule to test the concept of modulating TOP levels by sequencing the administration of the respective TOP inhibitors.  相似文献   

7.
周剂量多西紫杉醇联合顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期胃癌   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
  目的 观察周剂量多西紫杉醇联合顺铂(DDP)、5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和毒副作用。方法 晚期胃癌患者28例,给予多西紫杉醇35 mg/m2,静脉滴注1 h,第1、8、15天;DDP 75 mg/m2,均分第1 ~ 3天静脉滴注,5-Fu 500 mg/m2,24 h中心静脉置泵持续滴注,第1 ~ 5天,28 d为1个周期。化疗2 ~ 6个周期后按WHO实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)评定疗效,按WHO标准评价不良反应。结果 全组28例均可评价疗效,其中完全缓解(CR)2例,部分缓解(PR)13例,稳定(SD)7例,近期客观有效率53.4 %,中位疾病进展时间(TTP)为8.7个月,中位生存期(MS)为11.8个月,1年生存率为47.8 %。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应。但Ⅲ ~ Ⅳ度发生率较低。结论 周剂量多西紫杉醇联合DDP和5-Fu治疗晚期胃癌疗效较好,患者毒副作用轻,耐受性好,值得进一步推广使用。  相似文献   

8.
Fifty-six patients with measurable or evaluable advanced gastric cancer were treated with cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 in continuous infusion of 24 hours, and 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2/day (by continuous 5-day infusion) every 4 weeks. Three patients were found ineligible for the study. A response rate of 41% (22/53) was obtained (95% confidence interval: 28%-54%), with a median duration of remission of 10.2 months and an overall median survival time of 10.6 months. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were mild. Nausea and vomiting were common, and 23.5% of the patients had grade 3 stomatitis. Peripheral neuropathy and renal insufficiency increased with the number of cycles, representing the cumulative dose-limiting toxicity. This study indicates that the combination of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is synergistic or at least has additive antitumor activity. We think that this association of 2 drugs should be considered for further phase III clinical trials.  相似文献   

9.
Oh WK  Manola J  Richie JP  Loughlin KR  Kantoff PW 《Cancer》1999,86(7):1329-1334
BACKGROUND: The current treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma generates high response rates but is associated with poor overall survival. The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a new combination of active drugs in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with muscle invasive or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were enrolled. Fifteen patients (63%) had metastatic disease whereas 9 patients had T2-T4 disease. Three patients were unevaluable for response because of significant toxicity. Patients were treated every 28 days with methotrexate, 60 mg/m(2), intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1; cisplatin, 25 mg/m(2)/day, by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 2-6; 5-flurouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2)/day by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 3-6; and leucovorin, 500 mg/m(2)/day, by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 2-6. Dosage in subsequent cycles was adjusted according to toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 81 months (range, 53-97+ months). The overall response rate (complete response + partial response) for all 24 patients was 63% (95% confidence interval, 41-81%). The median survival was 65 months in the patients with muscle invasive disease and 17 months in the patients with metastatic disease. The duration of response in patients with metastatic disease was 6 months (range, 4-19 months). Toxicity was significant, with 82% of patients experiencing Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 63% experiencing Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. However, only three patients developed febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal and neurologic toxicity was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin represents an active regimen in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma with a moderate toxicity profile. As new drugs are found to treat urothelial carcinoma, further studies will be needed to evaluate the role of traditional agents such as 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in new combination chemotherapeutic regimens.  相似文献   

10.
Lee JH  Choi SJ  Lee JH  Lee YS  Seol M  Ryu SG  Jang S  Park CJ  Chi HS  Lee JS  Kim WK  Lee KH 《Leukemia research》2006,30(2):204-210
For refractory and early relapsed AML, this prospective phase II clinical trial evaluated a salvage chemotherapy regimen, which was consisted of continuous infusion intermediate-dose cytarabine (1g/m(2)/day, 24h i.v. infusion x 5), mitoxantrone (12 mg/m(2)/day x 3), and etoposide (150 mg/m(2)/day x 3). We treated 33 patients and 17 (51.5%) achieved CR with a median duration of 117 days. Median overall survival was 219 days. Our results suggest that continuous infusion intermediate-dose cytarabine, together with mitoxantrone and etoposide, may induce CR in a significant proportion of patients with refractory or early relapsed AML, although remission duration was short.  相似文献   

11.
BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin shows preclinical activity in many cancer cell lines that are resistant to cisplatin, and also has synergism with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of a combined oxaliplatin, 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) continuous infusion regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer who progressed during or after treatment with 5-FU and platinum compounds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with advanced gastric cancer, whose disease progressed while receiving, or after discontinuing, chemotherapy with a 5-FU and platinum regimen, were enrolled in this study. Treatment comprised oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 1) as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2 on day 1), and 48-h infusion of 5-FU 2.4-3.0 g/m2 concurrently with LV 150 mg/m2. Cycles were repeated at 2-week intervals. RESULTS: Of the 23 evaluable patients, there were six partial responses (response rate 26%). All responding patients were among those who entered into this trial immediately after failure of previous chemotherapy with 5-FU and cisplatin. The median time to progression was 4.3 months and the median overall survival was 7.3 months. The most common hematologic toxicity was grade 1-2 anemia in 39 cycles (39%). No grade 4 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia were observed. The most common non-hematologic toxicity was nausea/vomiting (33%). Peripheral neuropathy of grade 1 or 2 was noted (27%), but there was no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study of oxaliplatin, 5-FU and LV continuous infusion showed activity in previously platinum-treated patients with advanced gastric cancer, with acceptable toxicities.  相似文献   

12.
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to verify the efficacy and safety of "docetaxel + 5-fluorouracil + cisplatin" 3-day combination chemotherapy as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable gastric cancer. METHODS: Between January and November 2002, we enrolled 43 patients [males 31; median age 55 years (range 24-74)] with inoperable gastric cancer who had not been seen previously in Seoul National University Hospital. The regimen used was docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 3, and 5-fluorouracil 1200 mg/m(2) over 10 h on days 1-3, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 168 cycles were administered. Mean cycle number per patient was 3.9. The administered dose intensity of docetaxel was 21.23 mg/m(2)/week, 5-FU 1092.14 mg/m(2)/week and cisplatin 23.82 mg/m(2)/week, which corresponded to 91.1, 91.0 and 89.5% of planned doses. Of the 43 patients, response evaluation was possible in 40 and, of these patients, 17 (42.5%) achieved a partial response, 13 (32.5%) stable disease, and 10 patients (25%) showed progressive disease. The median time to progression was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6-6.6 months]. Median overall survival was 9.0 months. (95% CI 4.8-13.2 months). Leukopenia occurred during 21.4% of cycles (36 of 168 cycles); 14.3% grade 1, 5.3% grade 2 and 1.8% grade 3. Anemia occurred in 16.7% (28 of 168 cycles); 11.3% grade 1, 4.8% grade 2 and 0.6% grade 3. Thrombocytopenia was not observed. Diarrhea, stomatitis and hypersensitivity occurred in 4.7% (two out of 43 patients), respectively. Neutropenic fever occurred in two patients (4.7%) and myalgia in three (7.0%). CONCLUSION: "Docetaxel + 5-fluorouracil + cisplatin" 3-day combination chemotherapy is an active and tolerable regimen as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable gastric cancer.  相似文献   

13.
We report a case of complete disappearance of multiple lung metastases and mediastinal lymphnode metastasis by intravenous administration of 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin (FP) after operation for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A 54-year-old male was diagnosed with HCC associated with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. He also had a single lung metastasis at the time of diagnosis. After hepatic resection for HCC, the metastatic tumor progressed and became multiple lesions with mediastinal lymphnode involvements. Low-dose FP therapy was performed. Then, 250 mg/m(2)/day of 5-fluorouracil was given intravenously for 5 days weekly by continuous infusion and 10 mg/m(2)/day of cisplatin by intravenous infusion. Both lung metastases and mediastinal lymphnode metastasis were decreasing after six cycles of this therapy. Because of alcoholism and liver damage, chemotherapy could not be continued. But all metastatic lesions were completely disappeared ten months after this therapy. Bone marrow suppression (grade 4) was observed during the chemotherapy but resolved by interruption of treatment. Low-dose FP therapy may well be useful for patients suffering from advanced HCC with distant metastasis.  相似文献   

14.
This phase I study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. 32 patients received docetaxel at 60, 75, 85 or 100 mg/m(2) by 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed, after a 1-h interval, by 5-FU at 250, 350, 500 or 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion over 5 days every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting stomatitis defined the maximum tolerated dose at a docetaxel dose of 100 mg/m(2) with 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day. None of 5 patients treated at the previous dose level (docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) with 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day) had a dose-limiting toxicity in the first cycle, and this was, therefore, considered the recommended dose. The combination was generally well tolerated. Grade 4 neutropenia was common (29 patients; 91%), but no patient experienced febrile neutropenia of duration >3 days requiring i.v. antibiotics. An objective response was achieved by 18 patients overall (56%), and in 4 out of 5 patients treated with the determined recommended dose. No pharmacokinetic interaction between docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil was apparent. The activity of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) with 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day will be explored more extensively in phase II studies of patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy.  相似文献   

15.
To improve survival rate in advanced head and neck cancer, we scheduled 90 patients to receive low dose cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil regimen as neoadjuvant(NAC), concurrent(CC), adjuvant(AC), and second line chemotherapy (SC) setting. Our regimen consisted of cisplatin (CDDP 5 mg/m2/1 hr infusion on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-26) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU 200 mg/m2/24 hr infusion or oral administration of tegaful-uracil (UFT-E) 400 mg/body on days 1-28). The concurrent chemoradiotherapy consisted of conventional irradiation with 1.6-2.0 Gy/day on five days per week up to a total dose around 60Gy, and CDDP 3 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion over 1 hour plus 5-FU 150 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion over 24 hours per day on five days per week. For SC, 24 patients evaluable for response, 4 CR and 6 PR with RR of 42% were achieved. For NAC, 14 patients were evaluated for response, 2 CR and 7 PR were achieved. CC was indicated for locally unresectable cases. Of the 33 patients evaluable for response were 17 CR and 9 PR with RR of 79%. Dose limiting toxicities for chemotherapy were anemia and leukopenia and chemoradiotherapy was mucositis. Our treatment modality showed marginal toxicity and good response. Moreover, our regimen could be given in an outpatient setting safely so quality of life for patients was identical. We concluded that for advanced head and neck cancer, these treatment options were effective for second line and adjuvant setting. Chemoradiotherapy with this regimen also gave a impact for improving local control and survival period for locally unresectable cases.  相似文献   

16.
The purpose of this Phase II pilot study was to determine whether a dose-intensive regimen of weekly cisplatin combined with other active non-cross-resistant agents would improve the response rate and survival time of patients with extensive non-small cell lung cancer. Patients received cisplatin (50 mg/m2/wk) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 36, 43, 50, and 57 combined with mitomycin C (8 mg/m2) on days 1 and 36, vinblastine (3 mg/m2) on days 8 and 43, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (1 g/m2) by continuous infusion over 24 hours on days 15 and 50. Responding patients received consolidation therapy with cisplatin and etoposide (VP-16). Of 82 registered patients, 80 were eligible and 77 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 23% with 1 patient achieving a complete response (CR) and 17 patients achieving a partial response (PR). The median survival time was 4.6 months. The toxicity profile was not different from that described for standard-dose regimens. Although this regimen does not offer any benefit over standard-dose cisplatin regimens for patients with extensive non-small lung cancer, the weekly schedule permits a dose-intensive regimen with acceptable toxicity for tumors that may benefit from this approach.  相似文献   

17.
目的研究FEP方案治疗晚期和转移性胃癌的疗效和毒副反应。方法5-Fu500mg/m2,静滴6小时以上,第1~5天;EPI60mg/m2,第1天;DDP25~30mg/m2,第1~3天,21天为一周期,完成两周期及以上者作疗效评定。结果34例患者其中CR2例(5.9%),PR12例(35.3%),SD13例(38.2%),PD7例(20.6%),总有效率41.2%,中位缓解期7.9个月,中位生存期10.8个月,1年生存率40.3%。毒副反应以骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应及脱发为主。结论FEP方案治疗晚期和转移性胃癌有效,毒副反应可耐受。  相似文献   

18.
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an incurable disease despite significant progress in chemotherapy. We conducted a phase II clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a cisplatin, etoposide, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination in advanced metastatic and/or recurrent NSCLC. Forty patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic, measurable NSCLC were treated with cisplatin, 60 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1; etoposide, 120 mg/m2/day i.v. on days 1, 2, and 3; and 5-FU. 1,000 mg/m2/day i.v. continuous infusion on days 1 through 5. Treatment was administered in 4-week cycles. Thirty patients had distant metastases and were previously untreated, and 10 patients had recurrent disease after prior treatment with either surgery (1 patient), radiation therapy (5 patients), or both treatments (4 patients). Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response. Seven (24%) patients achieved a partial remission (PR), 18 (62%) had stable disease (SD), and 8 (14%) had progressive disease (PD). Overall median survival was 7.9 months (range, 0.4-27.4 months). Patients who achieved a PR had a median survival of 23.5 months (9.3-27.4 months). In contrast, patients with SD had a median survival of 9.9 months (2.5-25.3 months), and patients with PD had a median survival of 2.1 months (1-9.3 months). Median duration of response of 27.1 weeks (4.9-76.5 weeks) for patients with PR, and time to progression was 13.4 weeks (3.7-54.5 weeks) for patients with SD. Toxicity was primarily hematologic and gastrointestinal, and there were three deaths due to infection. The combination of cisplatin, 5-FU, and etoposide as administered in this study appears to have considerable toxicity and does not appear to be superior to other cisplatin-containing regimens used for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.  相似文献   

19.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the treatment of advanced gastric cancer is not very good. The response rate to the original etoposide--leucovorin--5-fluorouracil (ELF) treatment is 53% with tolerable side effects. Whether increasing the dose intensity by prolonging the duration of infusion with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) from 3 to 5 days for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients would enhance the efficacy but not increase side effects is still unknown. METHODS: Thirty-six advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable or evaluable diseases were scheduled to receive intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m2/day on days 2-4, LV 300 mg/m2/day intravenously and 5-FU 500 mg/m2/day intravenously on days 1-5, every 4 weeks. All patients who received at least two courses of chemotherapy were evaluated for tumor response, survival and response duration and toxicity according to the WHO criteria. RESULTS: Thirteen patients showed a response, including five with complete response (CR). The overall response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval, CI, 20-52%) in the whole group and 46% (95% CI 28-66%) in the 28 patients with measurable disease. The median progression-free interval and overall median survival time were 5 and 7 months, respectively. The most frequent toxicity was alopecia (grade I/II 56.3%). The incidence of grade III or greater myelosuppression was 5.9%. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the modified ELF by increasing the dosages of 5-FU and LV is not superior to the results of the original regimen, yet it is a relatively safe and tolerable combination regimen for advanced gastric cancer.   相似文献   

20.
This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the safety and effectiveness of different sequences of treatment with cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with unresectable advanced and post-operative recurrent gastric cancer. Patients with unresectable advanced or post-operative recurrent gastric cancer were randomly assigned by a registration center to group A or B. Group A received CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) as a continuous 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1 and 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)) as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 2-5. Group B was given 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)) as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-4, followed by CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) as a continuous 2-h intravenous infusion on day 5. Each course of chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days. A total of 74 patients were enrolled. One patient died accidentally, and 5 could not be evaluated. Response was assessable in 68 patients. The response rate was 31.3% (10/32) in group A as compared with 13.9% (5/36) in group B. Although the response rate was higher in Group A, the difference was not significant (p=0.085). The response rate in patients with diffuse type tumors was significantly lower in group B. There was no difference between the groups in response among patients with intestinal type tumors. The median overall survival was 239 and 174 days and time to progression was 175 and 140 days in group A and group B, respectively. Although there were trends toward longer survival and time to progression in group A, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. There was also no difference in the type or incidence of adverse reactions. The results of this controlled study indicate that the overall response rate was slightly but not significantly higher in patients who received CDDP before 5-FU. Among patients with diffuse type tumors, the response rate was significantly lower when 5-FU was administered before CDDP. Our results suggest that CDDP should be given before 5-FU in patients with gastric cancer when treated with a combination of CDDP and 5-FU.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号