单侧输卵管切除术对体外受精-胚胎移植周期卵巢反应性和结局的影响

目的:研究单侧输卵管切除术对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)周期卵巢反应性和妊娠结局的影响。方法:以行IVF-ET单侧输卵管切除的106例不孕患者为研究组,同期双侧输卵管梗阻的患者360例为对照组,比较研究组输卵管切除后术侧和健侧超促排卵启动日卵巢的大小和窦卵泡数、hCG注射日卵巢的大小、≥12mm卵泡数和获卵数,同时比较研究组和对照组≥12mm卵泡数、获卵数、受精数、优质胚胎数以及Gn用量、用药天数、妊娠率。结果:研究组中术侧和健侧启动日卵巢的大小无显著性差异,然而超促排卵启动日窦卵泡数、hCG注射日双侧卵巢大小、≥12mm卵泡数和获卵数均有统计学差异。研究组无论是hCG注射日≥12mm卵泡数、获卵数、Gn用量、用药天数,还是受精数、优胚数和妊娠率与对照组比较,均无显著性差异。结论:单侧输卵管切除术降低同侧卵巢的反应性,但总体上不影响卵巢对Gn的反应和IVF-ET妊娠结局。     

输卵管手术对体外受精-胚胎移植患者卵巢血流及反应性的影响

目的:探讨在体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)中输卵管手术对控制性超排卵(COH)患者卵巢的血流及卵巢储备功能的影响。方法:选择因异位妊娠或输卵管阻塞粘连行一侧输卵管切除或修复整形(单侧手术组)、双侧输卵管切除或双侧输卵管修复整形(双侧手术组)以及双侧输卵管均未行手术(对照组)的输卵管性不孕患者共70例,观察其在IVF-ET控制性超排卵中卵巢的血流变化及卵巢对COH的反应。结果:①3组患者的年龄、不育年限、用药天数及用药量均无统计学差异(P>0.05),单侧手术组术侧卵巢月经d3卵巢基质血流的搏动指数(PI)、收缩期峰流速(PSV)及hCG注射日(dhCG)PI与健侧卵巢差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但术侧卵巢d3血流阻力指数(RI)、RI(dhCG)明显大于健侧卵巢,PSV(dhCG)则明显小于健侧卵巢(P<0.05)。术侧卵巢的基础窦卵泡数(AFC)、dhCG≥14mm卵泡数以及获卵数明显少于健侧卵巢(P<0.05);②3组患者在d3的PI、RI、PSV,PI(dhCG)、RI(dhCG)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但双侧手术组PSV(dhCG)明显低于对照组(P<0.05),其基础AFC、hCG注射日≥14mm卵泡数及获卵数也明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:输卵管手术会影响卵巢的血运,降低卵巢的储备功能。     

输卵管手术对控制性超排卵时卵巢反应性的影响

目的:探讨IVF-ET中不同的输卵管手术方式对控制性超排卵(COH)过程中患者卵巢反应性的影响。方法:回顾性分析长方案超排卵IVF周期临床资料,选择397例因输卵管因素不孕患者,其中手术组176例,非手术组221例;手术组患者均因输卵管妊娠或输卵管阻塞、粘连或积水行单侧或双侧输卵管切除或输卵管修复整形手术,其中单侧输卵管切除组70例(A组),双侧输卵管切除组46例(B组),单侧输卵管整形组27例(C组),双侧输卵管整形组33例(D组);非手术组均未为双侧输卵管阻塞无积水患者,作为对照组(E组)。比较各组的临床资料、卵巢对促排卵的反应性和妊娠结局。结果:B组基础FSH值显著高于E组(P<0.05),卵泡数(直径≥15mm)、获卵数显著低于E组(P<0.05)。A组术侧卵巢卵泡数(直径≥15mm)和获卵数明显少于健侧卵巢(P<0.05)。但输卵管手术不影响IVF-ET,各组的的妊娠率和种植率无统计学差异。结论:输卵管切除降低了卵巢超排卵时的反应性,手术可能影响卵巢的血供进而影响卵巢对COH的反应。     

输卵管切除术对促超排卵周期卵巢反应的影响

目的 探讨输卵管切除术对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)周期促超排卵中卵巢反应的影响。方法对我院2001年1月至2001年12月间91例因异位妊娠切除输卵管的患者(观察组)接受体外受精-胚胎移植治疗时促超排卵中卵巢反应和结局进行分析。91例因男性因素或不明原因行IVF-ET术的患者为对照组。结果两组患者的年龄、促性腺激素用量、内膜厚度、卵泡数、取卵数、胚胎移植数及妊娠率问的差异无显著性。单侧输卵管切除的患者中输卵管切除侧卵巢与对侧卵巢的卵泡数和取卵数间的差异无显著性。双侧输卵管切除术后卵巢总卵泡数和取卵数与对照组相比差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论 输卵管切除术对IVF-ET周期中卵巢反应和妊娠率无显著影响。     

不同输卵管手术方式对体外受精-胚胎移植治疗结局的影响

目的:探讨体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)中不同的输卵管手术方式对治疗结局的影响。方法:回顾性分析长方案超促排卵IVF周期378例输卵管因素不孕患者:双侧输卵管切除58例(A组);双侧输卵管造口45例(B组);双侧输卵管近端结扎+远端造口37例(C组);单侧输卵管整形42例(D组);单侧输卵管切除45例(E组);随机选取单纯双侧输卵管梗阻无积水患者151例作为对照组(F组);比较患者的一般情况、卵巢对促排卵的反应性和临床治疗结局。结果:①基础窦卵泡(bAFC)数、Gn使用总量、Gn用药时间、hCG注射日卵泡数目、获卵数及冷冻胚胎数,A组较其他手术组及对照组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);其他手术组与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。各组间受精率、优质胚胎率和移植胚胎数均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。B组妊娠率和种植率显著低于其他各组,而异位妊娠率和流产率显著高于其他各组(P<0.05)。②E组患侧(手术侧)hCG注射日卵巢体积(OVVOL)、卵泡数(直径≥15 mm)和获卵数明显少于健侧卵巢(P<0.05),而D组患侧与健侧上述指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:双侧输卵管切除术增大了促排卵Gn用量和使用天数,减少了获卵数;但不影响受精率、优质胚胎率及着床率,因而不影响IVF-ET单次临床妊娠率。单侧手术由于健侧输卵管的代偿作用对IVF治疗无明显影响。造口术再次发生输卵管积水风险升高,种植率、妊娠率下降,异位妊娠率和流产率升高。     

体外受精—胚胎移植前切除积水输卵管的意义

目的探讨体外受精-胚胎移植 (in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer,IVF-ET) 前切除积水的输卵 管的意义。方法回顾性分析因输卵管积水导致不孕而要求接受IVF-ET的32例患者,其中17例病人在 IVF-ET切除了积水的输卵管,共接受IVF-ET27个周期,为观察组;有15例病人未切除积水输卵管,共接 受IVF-ET26个周期,为对照组。比较两组病人卵巢对超排卵的反应、受精率、卵裂率、累计胚胎评分(cumula tive embryo score,CES)、胚胎种植率、临床妊娠率。结果观察组受精率、卵裂率、胚胎种植率、临床妊娠率分别 为76.9％、75.0％、11.6％、33.9％,均显著地高于对照组的69.2％、66.7％、2.3％、7.7％,P＜0.05;观察组CES 为(43.4±11.2),非常显著地高于对照组(36.6±13.1),P＜0.01;观察组和对照组的获卵数分别为(13.1±9.7) 个和(12.9±8.2)个,无显著差异。结论IVF-ET前切除积水的输卵管可改善IVF-ET的结局,并且不影响 卵巢对超排卵的反应。     

卵巢及输卵管手术对卵巢反应性的影响

目的:探讨卵巢肿瘤剔除术,输卵管手术对卵巢功能的影响。方法:以曾做卵巢肿瘤剔除术、输卵管妊娠行输卵管手术者为实验组,输卵管阻塞性不孕患者为对照组,回顾性分析两组因不孕行体外受精-胚胎移植患者的卵巢对控制性超排卵的反应。结果:实验组窦卵泡数,hCG日直径≥14mm、<14 mm的卵泡数,取卵数均明显少于对照组,促性腺激素(FSH)用量明显多于对照组;卵巢肿瘤剔除术组hCG日直径≥14 mm的卵泡数、取卵数明显少于输卵管切除术组和输卵管修补组;输卵管切除术组hCG日直径≥14 mm,<14 mm的卵泡数,取卵数均明显少于输卵管修补术组。三实验组术侧卵巢对比,卵巢肿瘤剔除术组除各项参数均明显低于输卵管切除术组及输卵管修补术组。结论:卵巢及输卵管手术均影响卵巢功能,减低卵巢储备能力,手术范围越大,损伤越大。     

超促排卵时输卵管切除对卵巢功能的影响

目的:探讨输卵管切除术对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)治疗患者卵巢功能的影响。方法:选择在本中心行输卵管切除,且手术前、后均IVF-ET治疗的46例患者,共92个治疗周期。其中单侧输卵管切除22例,双侧输卵管切除24例。记录卵巢超促排卵过程中的各项指标,比较输卵管切除前、后卵巢对超促排卵治疗的反应。结果:单侧输卵管切除患者:切除前、后的促性腺激素(Gn)用药天数、Gn用量、E2值(hCG日血清E2值)、获卵数、有效胚胎数、优质胚胎数均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。与切除前比,双侧输卵切除患者切除后Gn用药天数较长(P<0.05),Gn用量较大(P<0.05);切除前、后的E2值、获卵数、有效胚数、优质胚胎数均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:单侧输卵管切除术不影响卵巢对超促排卵治疗的反应性。双侧输卵管切除术将降低卵巢对Gn的敏感性,使Gn的用药天数和用药量增加,切除双侧输卵管需谨慎。     

输卵管手术对IVF-ET卵巢反应性及妊娠结局影响的研究

目的:探讨输卵管手术对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)过程中卵巢反应性和妊娠结局的影响。方法:接受IVF-ET治疗、符合纳入标准的650例不孕症患者共650个周期。曾因输卵管妊娠或输卵管阻塞、粘连或积水行输卵管切除术或修复整形手术的共304例,其中行输卵管切除术155例(A组),单侧输卵管切除126例(单侧输卵管切除组),双侧输卵管切除29例(双侧输卵管切除组);输卵管修复整形术149例(B组)。同期因输卵管因素不孕或单纯男方因素行IVF-ET者为对照组,346例。检测各组的性激素水平及AFC,比较卵巢反应性及妊娠结局。结果:1A组与对照组相比,低反应发生率增加(P0.05),而B组与对照组相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。2A组与对照组相比,基础促卵泡生成素(b FSH)、b FSH/黄体生成素(b LH)、雌二醇(b E2)水平均明显增高(P0.01,P0.05),B组b E2显著高于对照组(P0.01)。3A组、B组与对照组相比,促性腺激素(Gn)天数延长(P0.01,P0.05)、Gn用量均增加(P0.01),A组Gn天数长于B组(P0.05)。3组间优质胚胎率、正常受精率、临床妊娠率、种植率和流产率差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。4单侧输卵管切除患者术侧卵巢与对侧卵巢比较,术侧卵巢的窦卵泡数与获卵数均明显减少(P0.01)。5双侧输卵管切除组与单侧输卵管切除组相比,Gn天数延长,Gn用量增加(P0.01)。结论:输卵管手术会影响卵巢储备功能和卵巢反应性,影响程度与手术范围和手术损伤程度有关,但不会明显影响IVF-ET的结局。     

中药补肾调经方对体外受精-胚胎移植超排卵周期妊娠结局及骨形成蛋白(BMP)-15的影响

目的:探讨中药补肾调经方对提高IVF-ET超排卵周期所获卵和胚胎质量的作用及其机制。方法:将70例因输卵管因素行IVF-ET的患者随机分为中药+控制性超排卵(实验组,n=35)和单纯控制性超排卵组(对照组,n=35),应用Western blotting法测定取卵日成熟卵泡卵泡液中骨形成蛋白-15(bone morphogenetic protein-15,BMP-15)的含量;用RT-PCR法检测颗粒细胞中BMP-15 mRNA的表达;并比较组间的获卵数、受精率、优质胚胎率及妊娠率等。结果:实验组卵泡液中BMP-15mRNA水平及颗粒细胞中BMP-15 mRNA的表达均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);实验组的临床妊娠率(71.42%)显著高于对照组(48.57%)(P<0.05)。结论:补肾调经方可以提高IVF-ET妊娠率,其作用机制可能与调控卵泡液和颗粒细胞BMP-15水平有关。     

Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to superovulation in an in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer program

Objective: To investigate the effect of salpingectomy on the response of each ovary in patients undergoing an IVF-ET treatment cycle and to compare the results with those of patients who had not had surgery and were undergoing IVF-ET during the same period.

Design: A prospective study.

Setting: Tertiary referral academic IVF unit.

Patient(s): Twenty-nine ET cycles were evaluated in 29 patients who previously had undergone unilateral salpingectomy because of ectopic pregnancy (study group). Seventy-three patients with unexplained or male factor infertility served as controls.

Intervention(s): Ovulation induction and IVF-ET.

Main Outcome Measure(s): In the study group, mean ovarian volume, number of follicles, and number of oocytes recovered from each ovary were assessed and compared. The overall results, cycle characteristics, and pregnancy rates of the two groups were compared.

Result(s): Among the patients who had undergone salpingectomy, significantly fewer follicles developed and consequently fewer oocytes were retrieved from the ovary on the operated side (4.4 versus 8.2 follicles and 3.8 versus 6.0 oocytes). There were no differences in the total numbers of follicles and oocytes recovered from both ovaries, the cycle characteristics, or the pregnancy rates between study and control groups.

Conclusion(s): Salpingectomy has no detrimental effect on the total ovarian performance during IVF-ET treatment or on the outcome of IVF-ET. However, the ipsilateral ovary could be adversely affected. This could be detrimental in selected patients undergoing IVF-ET, in whom the second ovary already is compromised or missing.     

输卵管切除术对体外受精—胚胎移植中控制性超促排卵的影响

目的 探讨输卵管切除后对卵巢功能的影响。方法 选择因异位妊娠行一侧输卵管切除的患者手术侧卵巢与对侧卵巢及行输卵管切除的患者与双侧输卵管健全的患者,在行体外受精-胚胎移植（IVF-ET）中其卵巢对控制性超促排卵的反应。结果 输卵管切除侧卵巢尽管其体积无明显改变,但其卵泡数及所获卵子数明显少于健侧卵巢,而存留一侧输卵管患者与对照组相比,在卵巢大小,用药量、用药天数、子宫内膜厚度、卵泡数及所获卵子数上并无显著差别。结论 输卵管切除术在短期内虽然不能影响卵巢的体积。但却降低了同侧卵巢的储备功能。因此,临床上对有生育要求的异位妊娠患者,应尽可能地保留患侧输卵管,对于输卵管积水行体外的储备功能。因此,临床上对有生育要求的异位妊娠患者,应尽可能地保留患侧输卵管,对于输卵管积水行体外受精-胚胎移植者,如对侧卵巢缺如或卵巢功能低下,不宜做预防性输卵管切除术。     

Ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation in repeated IVF cycles after unilateral salpingectomy

Purpose : This study aimed to examine ovarian response to gonadotrpoin stimulation after repeated IVF treatment cycles in patients who underwent previous unilateral salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy. Methods : The study group included 26 patients who underwent unilateral salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy 1–9 years prior to starting IVF treatment. A control group of 52 patients with anatomically intact pelvis was treated during the same time period by ICSI. The two groups were matched for age, number of gonadotropin ampules, and length of stimulation. End point measurements included number of follicles, oocytes, and cleaved embryos in consecutive treatment cycles of each group. Results : There were 98 cycles in the study group and 154 cycles in the control group. The mean number of follicles, retrieved oocytes, and cleaved embryos were not different in the two groups, and no reductions in these parameters were noted up to 10 cycles of treatment. The mean number of follicles ipsilateral to the operated side was similar to the number of follicles of the contralateral ovary and was not different whether salpingectomy was by laparoscopy or laparotomy. Conclusions : Unilateral salpingectomy does not affect ipsilateral ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation even after repeated IVF treatment cycles.     

The impact of unilateral salpingectomy on antral follicle count and ovarian response in ICSI cycles: comparison of contralateral side

Objective: To determine the impact of salpingectomy on the ovarian reserve. Comparisons are made with the contralateral side in patients with unilateral salpingectomy undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

Study design: Patients under 40 with unilateral salpingectomy and without history of ovarian surgery were selected for the multicentre retrospective study. Women with bilateral salpingectomy and history of endometriosis were excluded from the study. Antral follicle count, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) parameters and number of collected oocytes were the main outcome measures of the study.

Results: A total of 56 patients were eligible for this study. The mean age of the patients was 31.6?±?4.7 years. The reasons for the salpingectomy were hydrosalpinx (39.3%, n?=?22) and ruptured ectopic pregnancy (60.7%, n?=?34). The ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 30.6%. There was no statistically significant difference between the operated and non-operated sides in antral follicle count (AFC), follicles ≥?17?mm and 10–17?mm on day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), or number of aspirated oocytes. In the subgroup analysis, AFC, number of growing follicles on day of hCG and number of collected oocytes were comparable between the ectopic pregnancy group and hydrosalpinx group.

Conclusion: The study suggests that salpingectomy is not associated with detrimental effects on AFC and ovarian response.     

Ovarian Response to Gonadotropins in Patients With Tubal Factor Infertility: Salpingectomy Versus Nonsalpingectomy

Study ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of salpingectomy on the ovarian response to gonadotropins and in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle outcomes in women with tubal factor infertility.DesignA retrospective study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3)SettingAn in vitro fertilization laboratory in a university hospital in Taiwan.PatientsWe analyzed the outcomes of 288 consecutive fresh IVF-ET cycles in 251 consecutive women with tubal factor infertility from January 2001 to December 2011. Two hundred eighty-eight cycles were divided into 2 groups comprising 103 cycles with laparoscopic salpingectomy and 185 cycles with prior bilateral tubal sterilization, laparoscopic tuboplasty, or proximal tubal occlusion as the control group.InterventionsControlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IVF-ET.Measurements and Main ResultsThe main outcome was measured by comparing the duration of stimulation, number of gonadotropin ampoules per cycle, number of follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. We observed no significant difference in any ovarian response parameter between the salpingectomy and nonsalpingectomy groups. Implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were similar. The mean numbers of follicles and oocytes retrieved ipsilateral to the operated side in the salpingectomy group were similar to the numbers of follicles and oocytes retrieved from the nonoperated ovary.ConclusionsLaparoscopic salpingectomy did not have a negative effect on the ovarian response in women with tubal factor infertility.     

Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether laparoscopic salpingectomy compromises ovarian response in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF).MethodsIn a retrospective study in Changsha, China, data from 76 women who underwent ovarian stimulation before and after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy were compared with those from 80 women who underwent 2 IVF cycles without surgical intervention between 2004 and 2009.ResultsThere were no differences in basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or estradiol (E₂); length of stimulation; or numbers of follicles, retrieved and fertilized oocytes, or high-quality embryos between the cycles before and after salpingectomy; however, initial and total doses of gonadotropins were significantly increased after surgery (P < 0.05). IVF parameters were also comparable between the 2 cycles among women without surgical intervention, except for a significant increase in initial and total doses of gonadotropins at the second cycle (P < 0.05). IVF parameters did not differ between the cycle subsequent to salpingectomy and the second cycle in women without surgical intervention. There were no significant differences between patients with unilateral and those with bilateral salpingectomy, nor between the operated and non-operated ovary in the same individual.ConclusionLaparoscopic salpingectomy had no detrimental effect on ovarian response during IVF–embryo transfer treatment.