Effects of a blocked atrial beat on the atrioventricular nodal recovery property in patients with dual nodal pathways

Dual AVN physiology can be demonstrated by a variety of maneuvers. To determine whether AVN recovery times following a blocked extrastimulus facilitate or obscure detection of dual AVN physiology, 11 patients (9-17 years) were studied with dual AVN pathways by using single and double atrial extrastimuli. With a single atrial extrastimuli, the premature atrial stimulus (A2) was coupled to basic atrial beats (A1). The fast and slow AVN recovery curves were constructed with plots of the nodal conduction time against the recovery time (A1A2,A2H2). With double atrial extrastimuli, a fixed blocked A2 beat (A2B) was followed by a scanning atrial beat (A3). The nodal recovery property post-A2B was studied by plots of A2BA3,A3H3. In all patients the recovery curve of the fast pathway post-A2B had a leftward shift when compared to that of the pre-A2B curve (i.e., the AH was shortened at the same recovery time). The window of slow pathway conduction post-A2B disappeared totally in five patients and decreased significantly in six patients (post-A2B: 26 +/- 42 ms; pre-A2B: 80 +/- 65 ms, P < 0.05). In the six patients that still had slow pathway conduction post-A2B, the slow pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was significantly less than that of pre-A2B (215 +/- 38 vs 268 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.05). The fast pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was also diminished significantly (235 +/- 62 vs 357 +/- 76 ms, P < 0.0001). The authors conclude that blocked atrial beats decrease the visibility of the slow pathway conduction.     

Use of Double Ventricular Extrastimulation to Determine the Preexcitation Index in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

The ability of single paced ventricular beats during tachycardia to penetrate the tachycardia circuit and reset the subsequent atrial depolarization (atrial preexcitation), enabling calculation of the "preexcitation index," can be helpful in analyzing supraventricular tachycardias, However, the ventricular refractory period often prevents ventricular capture of beats with the necessary prematurity to demonstrate atrial preexcitation, particularly in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We hypothesized that the use of double premature stimuli could overcome this limitation. In 25 consecutive patients with either AVNRT or atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) we attempted to demonstrate atrial preexcitation with single and double ventricular extrastimuli. Whereas atrial preexcitation with a single extrastimulus could only be achieved in 3 of 11 patients with AVNRT, all but 1 patient demonstrated atrial preexcitation with the use of double ventricular extrastimuli. On the other hand, in all but 1 patient with AVRT, atrial preexcitation could be achieved with single and double extrastimuli. A formula was derived for obtaining a preexcitation index with double extrastimuli and shown to correspond closely with the preexcitation index obtained with a single extrastimulus in the 16 patients in whom atrial preexcitation could be achieved with single and double extrastimuli. Thus, this technique significantly enhances the ability to achieve atrial preexcitation and to calculate the preexcitation index in patients with AVNRT, and thus may be useful in deciphering tachycardia mechanism in some patients, as well as being a useful technique in studying the electrophysiological properties of the antegrade and retrograde limbs of AVNRT.     

Relation of age and sex to atrial electrophysiological properties in patients with no history of atrial fibrillation

Although atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia, especially in elderly men, little is known about age related changes in atrial electrophysiological properties or gender differences. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of aging on vulnerability to atrial fibrillation and assessed gender differences in those age related changes. An electrophysiological study was performed on 73 patients with no history of atrial fibrillation, structural heart disease, or conditions with potential effects on cardiac hemodynamic or electrophysiological function, including 25 women (mean age 49 +/- 18 years; range 12-84 years). The following atrial excitability parameters were assessed: spontaneous or paced (A1) and extrastimulated (A2) atrial electrogram widths, percent maximum atrial fragmentation (A2/A1 x 100), effective refractory period, wavelength index (effective refractory period/A2), and inducibility of atrial fibrillation. There were no significant differences in percent maximum atrial fragmentation (143 +/- 28 vs 142 +/- 35%), effective refractory period (241 +/- 39 vs 238 +/- 50 ms), wavelength index (2.9 +/- 0.8 vs 3.1 +/- 0.9), induction of atrial fibrillation (10 [21%] vs 7 [28%]), or age (50 +/- 17 vs 49 +/- 20 years) between men and women. Age was not statistically different between those patients with and without induction of atrial fibrillation in men (48 +/- 14 vs 50 +/- 18 years) and women (48 +/- 18 vs 49 +/- 21 years). Percent maximum atrial fragmentation and effective refractory period were directly correlated with age in men (r = 0.35, P = 0.01; r = 0.46, P < 0.001, respectively) and women (r = 0.42, P = 0.04; r = 0.45, P = 0.02, respectively), though wavelength index did not correlate with age in men (r = -0.04) or women (r = -0.04) with no history of atrial fibrillation. Considering these findings, the authors conclude that the mechanism triggering atrial fibrillation may be different between older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation, because younger patients who have no marked substrate for atrial fibrillation may need many trigger beats to induce atrial fibrillation.     

Electrophysiological properties of the left atrium evaluated by coronary sinus pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation

Repetitive atrial firing (RAF), marked fragmentation of atrial activity (FAA), and interatrial conduction delay (CD) have been shown to be electrophysiological features of the atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Moreover, it has been observed that atrial extrastimuli are more likely to induce AF when delivered from the right atrial appendage (RAA) than from the distal coronary sinus (CSd). We examined the electrophysiological properties of the atrial muscle by CS and RAA stimulation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Patients were divided into two groups: group I, consisting of 18 patients with clinical paroxysmal AF; and group II, consisting of 22 patients with various cardiac arrhythmias in which the substrate does not exist in the atrium. In group I, the following values of electrophysiological parameters of the atrium indicated that AF was more likely to be induced during RAA pacing than CSd pacing: atrial effective refractory period (RAA vs CSd: 201 +/- 28 ms vs 240 +/- 35 ms, P < 0.001), RAF zone (16 +/- 25 ms vs 0 +/- 0 ms, P < 0.03), FAA zone (38 +/- 37 ms vs 5 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.01), maximum interatrial conduction time (144 +/- 19 ms vs 93 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.0001) and CD zone (53 +/- 21 ms vs 9 +/- 18 ms, P < 0.0001). The values of the electrophysiological parameters of the atrium evaluated by CSd pacing in group I patients were not significantly different from those in group II patients. In conclusion, when coronary sinus stimulation is performed, electrophysiological properties of the atrium in patients with AF show a significant decrease in atrial vulnerability compared to stimulation from RAA and also show similar values to those in patients without AF. It might be suggested that the left posterior or posterolateral atrium is electrophysiologically stable even in patients with paroxysmal AF.     

Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome concomitant with asymptomatic Brugada syndrome

A 29-year-old man was referred for electrophysiological testing and radiofrequency ablation because of repeated episodes of palpitation over 2 years. A 12-lead electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm showed manifest Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and during palpitation showed narrow QRS tachycardia at a rate of 213 beats/min. Following successful radiofrequency ablation of the left anterolateral accessory pathway, sustained atrial fibrillation was induced by atrial extrastimulation. Cibenzoline (2 mg/kg body weight) was injected to terminate atrial fibrillation. ST-T segment elevation in the right precordial leads was observed following cibenzoline administration. Ventricular fibrillation was reproducibly induced by ventricular extrastimuli (S1: 600 ms, S2: 220 ms, S3: 210 ms).     

Electrophysiologic characteristics of atria in patients without heart disease

BACKGROUND: The significance of atrial fibrillation or tachycardia (AF) induction remains debatable. Some believe that the presence of heart disease (HD) increases the sensitivity and decreases the specificity of programmed atrial stimulation (PAS). There are few data in patients without HD. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of PAS in asymptomatic patients without HD and in those with documented spontaneous AF, but without HD, to know the diagnosis value of the technique. METHODS: A total of 4,900 PAS were consecutively performed. The control group (I, N=67) was defined by the absence of preexcitation syndrome, dizziness/syncope, hypertension, history of tachycardia, or other documented HD together with a normal 2D echocardiogram and 24-hour Holter monitoring. They were compared to a group (II) of 54 patients with documented paroxysmal AF and without HD. PAS used one and two extrastimuli, delivered during sinus rhythm and two drive rates (600, 400 ms). Atrial-effective refractory periods (ARP), their adaptation to cycle length, and conduction times were noted. AF induction was defined as the induction of AF lasting more than 1 minute. RESULTS: Group I patients (1.4% of 4,900) were younger than group II (51 +/- 17 vs 65 +/- 11 years, P < 0.001). A single extrastimulus never induced sustained AF in group I, but did so in 11 group II patients (20%); sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 15 group I patients (22%) and in 31 group II patients (57%) (P < 0.001). There were no ARP and conduction time differences in group I patients with and without inducible AF, but there was a longer sinus cycle length in patients with inducible AF (977 +/- 164 vs 838 +/- 141 ms, P < 0.02). There were no electrophysiological differences in group II patients with and without inducible AF. No group I patient developed spontaneous AF (follow-up 4 +/- 2 years). The sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was 20% and the specificity 100%; the sensitivity of PAS with two extrastimuli was 57% and the specificity 78%. CONCLUSION: Sustained AF was not induced by one extrastimulus in control patients without symptoms, nor heart disease, but sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 22% of these patients. The induction of a sustained AF by two extrastimuli should be interpreted cautiously, particularly in patients with a relative sinus bradycardia. However, the sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was very low and two extrastimuli were required in patients with spontaneous AF to induce the tachycardia. Other electrophysiological parameters were not useful to differentiate patients with and without inducible AF.     

Changes in Ventricular Effective Refractory Periods After Two Extrastimuli and Ventricular Electrical Instability

Using programmed stimulation with one and three extrastimuli delivered in the right ventricular apex, we compared the effective refractory period (ERP) during sinus rhythm (ERP-SR) and during the third extrastimulus (EHP-S₃) in patients without ventricular tachycardias (control group, n = 87) and in patients with documented ventricular tachycardia (VT group, n = 76). The protocol was not completed to determine ERP-S₃ in one patient in the control group and in 15 patients in the VT group. We observed a significantly greater change (i.e., shortening) in ERP after two extrastimuli in the VT group compared with patients without VT (ΔERP = 45 ± 20 msec in the control group and 70 ± 16 msec in the VT group, P < 0.001), This electrophysiological phenomenon, along with conduction delay, may play an important role in VT induction.     

Observations on the Initiation of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia by Programmed Stimulation

We analyzed the initiation of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) by programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in 50 consecutive patients who had clinical VT or aborted sudden cardiac death with remote myocardial infarction. In 25 of 50 patients, the first induced QRS complex of VT was morphologically identical to the succeeding QRS complexes of VT (type I). In 25 other patients, the first VT beat had a different morphology (type II). Type I had a significantly longer VT cycle length than type II (333 +/- 65 msec and 293 +/- 66 msec, P = 0.036). Type II VT initiation required more aggressive stimulation protocol than type I (type I: type II; number of extrastimulus required for induction 2.5 +/- 0.9 : 3.0 +/- 0.6, P = 0.026; shortest extrastimuli coupling interval 244 +/- 28 msec : 220 +/- 23 msec, P = 0.002). The interval between the last extrastimulus and the onset of the first VT beat was 408 +/- 88 msec in type I and 336 +/- 75 msec in type II (P = 0.004). Furthermore, there was good correlation between the VT cycle length and the interval from last extrastimulus to the onset of nonpaced beat in type I but not in type II.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mechanism and Clinical Significance of Atrial Repetitive Responses in Man

We have studied the electrophysiological correlates of atrial repetitive responses, induced by single extrastimuli, in a group of 25 patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies for a variety of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. The incidence of repetitive responses was not related to a previous history of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Repetitive responses were observed only when the extrastimulus elicited a significant intra-atrial conduction delay, as measured from the extrastimulus artifact, to two or three points in the atria. This condition was fulfilled only when the basic atrial rhythm was paced, and it was also facilitated by increasing atrial rate, which shortened the atrial effective refractory period. Atrial pacing thus seemed to facilitate the production of atrial repetitive responses by both promoting intra-atrial conduction delays during extrastimulation, and by shortening the atrial refractory period. Alrial repetitive responses are probably a nonspecific phenomenon, unrelated to a tendency towards atrial tachyarrhythmias; their mechanism is probably local re-entry, related to slow conduction of impulses during incomplete repoiarization, and under favorable conditions they may precipitate atrial flutter or fibrillation in predisposed patients.     

QT interval dispersion in ventricular beats: a noninvasive marker of susceptibility to sustained ventricular arrhythmias

Increased QT dispersion (QTd) calculated from sinus beats has been shown to identify patients prone to sustained VT. However, predictive accuracy of this parameter is limited. Electrophysiological properties of the myocardium may be altered by a premature ventricular beats, which is a well-established trigger for sustained VT. Therefore, the author hypothesised that QTd in spontaneous or paced ventricular beats may improve identification of patients with inducible sustained VT. In 28 consecutive patients (men, mean age 61 +/- 13 years) who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation, the values of QTd calculated in sinus and ventricular beats were compared between inducible and noninducible patients. The mean QTd values obtained using three different methods differed significantly, QTd in paced ventricular beats being the highest, QTd in spontaneous ventricular beats was intermediate, and QTd in sinus beats was the lowest (83.9 +/- 30 vs 63.0 +/- 29 ms vs 53.9 +/- 27 ms, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.004, respectively). In 13 (46%) patients sustained VT was induced. QTd values were significantly higher in inducible than noninducible patients (QTd sinus beats: 67.5 +/- 31 vs 42.1 +/- 11 ms, P = 0.02; QTd spontaneous ventricular beats: 79.3 +/- 35 vs 46.7 +/- 13 ms, P = 0.008, and QTd-paced ventricular beats: 104.8 +/- 32 vs 65.9 +/- 9 ms, P = 0.0009). The receiver operator characteristic curves showed that at a sensitivity level of 100%, the highest specificity for identification of inducible patients had QTd measured in paced ventricular beats (87%) followed by QTd in spontaneous ventricular beats (45%), and QTd in sinus beats (40%). In conclusion, (1) QTd in ventricular beats is greater than in sinus beats, and (2) QTd calculated from paced ventricular beats identifies patients with inducible sustained VT better than QTd measured during sinus rhythm.     

The Response of Regular Re-entrant Supraventricular Tachycardia to Right Heart Stimulation

The study was designed to assess the effect of various forms of right atrial or ventricular stimulation on the termination of re-entrant "supraventricular" tachycardias. Standard electrophysiological techniques were used in 81 patients to study 86 stable tachycardias. All tachycardias were initiated by single or double atrial or ventricular premature stimuli or incremental atrial pacing. Eight groups of tachycardia circuit were defined in terms of the anterograde and retrograde pathways. Termination of each tachycardia was studied by atrial underdrive, ventricular underdrive, rapid atrial stimulation and single or double atrial and ventricular premature extrastimuli. Intranodal re-entrant tachycardias formed 33% of the total and WPW tachycardias as a whole formed 55% of the total number of arrhythmias. The remainder were comprised of atrial tachycardia (5%), tachycardias in association with a partial AV nodal bypass (3%) and pre-excited tachycardias (5%). A single atrial extrastimulus was most effective where the circuit involved the right atrium. Atrial underdrive was consistently less successful than a single atrial extrastimulus in all groups. Rapid atrial pacing was effective in all groups, but caused transient atrial flutter or fibrillation in a proportion of each group except one. Ventricular underdrive stimulation was most effective in those groups where the right ventricle was involved in the circuit, but tended to be less effective than programmed single or double ventricular extrastimuli. Pacemakers designed to deliver appropriately timed single or double extrastimuli may offer an important alternative to other pacing modalities.     

Influence of age on atrial fibrillation inducibility

The prevalence of AF is known to increase in the elderly. Some electrophysiological changes were reported in these patients, but the effects of age on AF inducibility and other electrophysiological signs associated with atrial vulnerability are unknown. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of age on atrial vulnerability and AF induction. The study consisted of 734 patients (age 16-85 years, mean 61 +/- 15 years) without spontaneous AF who were admitted for electrophysiological study. Study was indicated for dizziness or ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Programmed atrial stimulation was systematically performed. One and two extrastimuli were delivered in sinus rhythm and atrial driven rhythms (600, 400 ms). Univariate and multivariate analysis of several clinical and electrophysiological data were performed. AF inducibility, defined as the induction of an AF lasting > 1 minute, was paradoxically and significantly decreased in elderly (> 70 years) patients compared to younger patients (< 70 years) (P < 0.01). AF inducibility was present in 40% of 62 patients < 40 years, 39% of 99 patients age 40-50 years, 37% of 130 patients age 50-60 years, 38% of 222 patients age 60-70 years, and only 28% of 221 patients > 70 years. There was no significant correlation with the sex, the presence of dizziness, the presence or not of an underlying heart disease, the left ventricular ejection fraction, and the presence of salvos of atrial premature beats on 24-hour Holter monitoring. There was a significant correlation with a longer atrial effective refractory period in the elderly (226 +/- 41 ms) than in younger patients (208 +/- 31 ms) (P < 0.001). Other electrophysiological parameters of atrial vulnerability did not change significantly. Increased atrial refractory period and age >70 years were independent factors of decreased AF inducibility. Programmed atrial stimulation should be interpreted cautiously before the age of 70 years. AF induction is facilitated by the presence of a short atrial refractory period in these patients. Surprisingly, AF inducibility decreases in patients > 70 years because their atrial refractory period increases. Therefore, increased AF prevalence in these patients should be explained by nonelectrophysiological causes.     

The different electrophysiological characteristics in children with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome between those with and without atrial fibrillation

Atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) is known to be the most common supraventricular tachycardias in childhood. Because AF with rapid ventricular response may degenerate to ventricular fibrillation through conduction of accessory pathways (APs), it can be potentially life-threatening in some pediatric patients with WPW syndrome. However, information about WPW syndrome children associated with AF is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in pediatric patients with WPW syndrome and AF. From July 1992 to February 2002, 51 pediatric patients with manifest WPW syndrome and documented AVRT underwent electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation. In these patients, two (4%) were found to have several spontaneous episodes of AF recognized on 12-lead standard ECG or 24-hour Holter monitoring. Eleven (22%) patients had AF induced by rapid atrial pacing during the baseline procedure of electrophysiological study. The children with manifest WPW syndrome were divided into two groups: those with AF (group 1; n = 11) consisted of seven male and four female children (mean age 15 +/- 3 years, range 10-18), and those without AF (group 2; n = 40) consisted of 22 boys and 18 girls (mean age 16 +/- 3 years, range 7-18). The study excluded a patient who had Ebstein's anomaly associated with moderate tricuspid regurgitation and right atrial enlargement. The onset and duration of symptoms were not significantly different between the two groups. Comparing the electrophysiological characteristics, the atrial effective refractory period (ERP) was shorter in WPW syndrome children with AF (170 +/- 36 vs 190 +/- 38 ms, P = 0.041). This study demonstrated that the pediatric WPW syndrome patients with AF had different electrophysiological characteristics from those without AF.     

The Asymptomatic Patient with the Wolff-Parkinson-White Electrocardiogram

Sudden death can be the first manifestation of the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. The underlying mechanism being atrial fibrillation with a very high ventricular rate, because of a short anterograde refractory period of the accessory atrioventricular pathway (AP), deteriorating into ventricular fibrillation. Information on the anterograde refractory period of the AP is therefore important to recognize asymptomatic people with the WPW ECG at risk for dying suddenly. Several noninvasive tests are available to identify the low risk patient. Decision making when to interrupt the AP in asymptomatic WPW patients not at low risk requires an invasive study to document the electrophysiological properties of the AP and to determine its exact location.     

Comparison of Isoproterenol and Exercise Tests in Asymptomatic Subjects with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

In order to evaluate the effects of increases of sympathetic tone in ventricular response during atrial fibrillation and in the relationship between the accessory pathway effective refractory period (ERP) and ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation, 20 male subjects, aged 19 +/- 6 years, were studied electrophysiologically in basal conditions, after isoproterenol infusion (2-4 micrograms/min) and during submaximal bicycle exercise test, at a constant workload equal to that which increases the sinus rate to the same extent (140 beats/min) induced by isoproterenol infusion. Accessory pathway ERP was evaluated at the same driven rate (150 beats/min) in both instances. In the control study as during both tests atrial fibrillation paroxysms were induced by burst stimulation. In control conditions the rate increase from 100 to 150 beats/min induced a reduction of accessory pathway ERP from 266 +/- 27 msec to 244 +/- 22 msec (P less than 0.005). At the same driven rate of 150 beats/min, isoproterenol infusion and exercise test induced a more marked shortening of accessory pathway ERP to 211 +/- 28 msec (P less than 0.005) and to 214 +/- 29 msec (P less than 0.005), respectively. Atrial fibrillation paroxysms lasting more than 10 seconds were induced in 20/20 cases in the control study, in 15/20 during isoproterenol infusion and in 13/19 cases during exercise test. The shortest cycle length during atrial fibrillation was reduced from a basal value of 253 +/- 72 msec to 204 +/- 27 msec (P less than 0.05) during isoproterenol infusion and to 236 +/- 32 msec (NS) during exercise test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The electrophysiological characteristics in patients with ventricular stimulation inducible fast-slow form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. METHODS: The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%). RESULTS: Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.     

The effects of aging on AV nodal recovery properties

The purpose of this study was to assess the changes of AV nodal recovery properties with aging. Although in children and young adults it was found that there were age dependent changes in their AV nodal recovery properties, in the older population this information was not available. In 92 subjects (aged 16-92 years) without AV nodal disease or dual AV nodal pathway physiology, their AV nodal recovery curves were studied by delivering premature atrial extrastimuli coupled to basic atrial beats during cardiac electrophysiological study. Data were analyzed using linear regression and curve-fitting techniques. Patients were grouped by age, group I < 40 years (n = 33), group II 40-59 years (n = 26), and group III > 60 years (n = 33). The results showed that the AV nodal recovery curve did not change significantly in the aging process except that the AV nodal effective refractory period had a positive correlation with increasing age. The latter was significantly increased in group III when compared to group I or group II. For this parameter, when patients whose AV nodal refractory period was limited by the atrial refractory period were excluded, there was still a statistically significant increase in group III compared to group II (P < 0.05): group I (n = 27): 202+/-42 ms; group II (n = 17): 197+/-26 ms; and group III (n = 17): 224+/-46 ms. The results suggest that the AV nodal recovery curve remains unchanged once it reaches adulthood, with the exception that the nodal effective refractory period becomes slightly longer after age 60.     

Dependency on Atrial Electrophysiological Properties of Appearance of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome: Evidence from Atrial Vulnerability Before and After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation and Surgical Cryoablation

The pathogenesis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and the effects of elimination of accessory pathways on the appearance of atrial fibrillation are still controversial. Fifty-four patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome were classified into three groups: a No AFgroup (n = 24), patients without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; an RF-AF Group (n =12), patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation whose accessory pathways were eliminated using radiofrequency catheter ablation; and a Cryo-AF Group (n = 18), patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation whose accessory pathways were eliminated with surgical Cryoablation. The electrophysiological characteristics of each group were evaluated prior to and following the elimination of their accessory pathways. As indices of atrial vulnerability, the presence of fragmented atrial activity and repetitive atrial firing zones were assessed. Deducibility of atrial fibrillation was significantly reduced following ablation of accessory pathways in the Cryo-AF group (83.3%-5.6%, P < 0.0001), while it was unchanged in the RF-AF group (83.3%-75%). In preablation studies, the effective refractory periods of the atrium in the RF-AF group and the Cryo-AF group were significantly shorter compared with the No AF group (204 ± 18 ms, 197 ± 16 ms vs 246 ± 44 ms, respectively, P < 0.0001). Following ablation, the effective refractory period for patients in the Cryo-AF group was significantly prolonged compared with before ablation (197 ± 16 ms to 232 ± 24 ms, P < 0.0001). As a result of this prolongation of the effective refractory period of the atrium, the fragmented atrial activity and repetitive atrial response zones narrowed following ablation in the Cryo-AF group, but not in the RF-AF group. Therefore, the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome may depend on the refractory period of the atrium rather than on the presence of accessory pathways.     

Transesophageal Measurement of Left Atrial Refractoriness

During electrophysiological evaluation of supraventricular arrhythmias the transesophageal (TEEP) approach may be the first step but is limited in information available. One difficulty is in measuring left atrial refractoriness as left atrial capture is seldom defectable either on ECG or via an esophageal lead. The problem may be eliminated and left atrial refractoriness measured via the esophagus, utilizing two or three extrastimuli to scan diastole to determine whether the atrial refractory period has been entered by the first extrastimulus. Measurement of left atrial and/or atrioventricular node or accessory pathway refractoriness then becomes possible.     

The effect of ibutilide on retrograde accessory pathway conduction

Ibutilide is a compound with Class III effects marketed for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. The Class III effect is primarily mediated by blockade of the rapid component of the cardiac delayed rectifier of potassium current, Ikr. Ibutilide was used in three patients with concealed accessory pathways during electrophysiological evaluation for ablation of symptomatic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia. Each pathway (mid-septal, left posterior, and left lateral) exhibited a mean retrograde effective refractory period of 240 +/- 20 ms. Each patient had atrioventricular reentry tachycardia that consistently degenerated to recurrent sustained atrial fibrillation. One to two milligrams of intravenous ibutilide converted atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and maintained sinus rhythm throughout the procedure. Retrograde accessory pathway conduction was unchanged. Maintenance of sinus rhythm allowed for successful mapping and catheter ablation of the concealed accessory pathways. No direct current cardioversion was needed. In these patients, ibutilide was effective in converting and controlling atrial fibrillation induced by atrioventricular reentry tachycardia without masking retrograde pathway conduction. Antegrade accessory pathway conduction could not be assessed in this study.