Laser lead extraction in adult congenital heart disease

Background: In adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), lead extraction procedures are expected to parallel increasing transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator implantations. We sought to assess the safety and feasibility of laser lead extraction in ACHD.
Methods and Results: All laser lead extractions (Spectranectics, Colorado Springs, CO, USA) performed at the Montreal Heart Institute between September 2000 and August 2005 were prospectively registered. Efficacy and complications in patients with ACHD were compared to the larger cohort. Laser lead extraction was attempted on 270 leads in 175 patients. In ACHD, 23 (five atrial, 15 ventricular pacing, and three defibrillator) leads were targeted in 16 patients. Indications were: infection 44%, dysfunction 25%, upgrade 25%, and pain 6%. Patients with ACHD were younger (43.0 ± 13.5 vs 63.7 ± 14.7 years, P < 0.0001) and had a higher proportion of active fixation leads (74% vs 37%, P = 0.0013). Lead age in patients with and without ACHD was 9.0 ± 5.2 vs 7.7 ± 5.2 years (P = 0.2713). Overall, 21 of 23 leads (91%) were successfully extracted in ACHD compared with 220 of 247 leads (89%) (P = 0.7405). One major complication (6.3%) occurred in ACHD (tricuspid valve laceration) compared with five major (3.0%) and eight minor (5.0%) complications in patients without ACHD. Presence of ACHD did not modulate procedural success (OR 1.3, 95% CI [0.3, 5.8]) or complications (OR 1.0, 95% CI [0.2, 4.4]). Median procedural time was 27 minutes longer in ACHD (127 vs 100 minutes, P = 0.0595).
Conclusion: In selected patients with ACHD, laser lead extraction may be performed with a safety and efficacy profile comparable to patients without ACHD.     

Hands on: How to approach patients undergoing lead extraction

Due to the growing number of patients treated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) there is an increased need for lead management, evaluation, and extraction. While CIED lead extraction has many indications, a consistent approach to preprocedural planning should be applied in all cases, including a thorough consultation with careful review of the patient's medical and device history, as well as a discussion of informed consent and shared decision‐making with the patient and their loved ones. The use of chest X‐ray, echocardiography, and computed tomography (CT) scan can further help with risk stratification and procedural planning. Intraprocedural echocardiography (transesophageal or intracardiac) is recommended and allows early recognition of cardiothoracic injury. Establishing an extraction team with cardiology/electrophysiology, anesthesiology, and CT surgery is is crucial to a successful and safe CIED extraction practice, including immediately available surgical backup. This hands‐on review will address how to approach patients who are undergoing lead extraction, as well as several innovations in preprocedure and intraprocedural risk assessment.     

Preprocedural computed tomography before cardiac implanted electronic device lead extraction: Indication,technique, and approach to interpretation

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) frequently need to be extracted due to infection, hardware failure, and other causes. The extraction of the CIED is typically performed using percutaneous methods. While these procedures are mostly performed without incident there is a small risk of significant complications. Dedicated imaging pre‐CEID removal to include the central veins and heart with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can be utilized to evaluate the lead course and termination, the integrity of the central veins and cardiac chambers, and identify potential complications that may alter the lead extraction procedure as well as reimplantation of subsequent leads. Indications for preprocedural imaging, the technique of dedicated preprocedural lead extraction MDCT, and the approach to the interpretation of the images is discussed in this review.     

Laser-assisted lead extraction of a retained lead remnant in the femoral and iliac veins

Herein, we present a case of laser-assisted extraction of a retained lead remnant following incomplete removal of an implantable cardiac defibrillator system implanted via a left femoral approach.     

Long-term survival following transvenous lead extraction: Importance of indication and comorbidities

1. Download : Download high-res image (186KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Laser lead extraction in octo- and nonagenarians. A subgroup analysis from the GALLERY registry

Introduction

In an aging population with cardiac implantable electronic devices, an increasing number of octo- and even nonagenarians present for lead extraction procedures. Those patients are considered at increased risk for surgical procedures including lead extraction. Here, we investigated safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction in a large patient cohort of octo- and nonagenarians.

Methods and Results

A subgroup analysis of all patients aged ≥80 years (n = 499) in the German Laser Lead Extraction Registry (GALLERY) was performed. Outcomes were compared to the nonoctogenarians from the registry. Primary extraction method was Laser lead extraction, with additional use of mechanical rotational sheaths or femoral snares, if necessary. An analysis of patient- and device characteristics, as well as an assessment of predictors for adverse events via multivariate analyses was conducted. Mean patients age was 84.3 ± 3.7 years in the octogenarians group and 64.1 ± 12.4 years in the nonoctogenarians group. The median lead dwell time was 118.0 months (78; 167) and 92.0 months [60; 133], p < .001 in the octogenarians and nonoctogenarians group, respectively. Clinical procedural success rate was achieved in 97.6% of the cases in octogenarians and 97.9% in nonoctogenarians (p = .70). Overall complication rate was 4.4% in octogenarians and 4.3% in nonoctogenarians (0.91). In octogenarians procedure-related mortality was 0.8% and all-cause in-hospital mortality was 5.4%, while in nonoctogenarians, procedure related and all-cause in-hospital mortality were 0.5% and 3.1%, respectively. A body mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m², was the only statistically significant predictor for procedure-related complications in octogenarians, while systemic infection, BMI ≤20 kg/m², procedural complications and chronic kidney disease were predictors for in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions

Laser lead extraction in octo- and nonagenarians is safe and effective. BMI ≤20 kg/m² was the only statistically significant predictor for procedural complications. According to our data, advanced age should not be considered as contraindication for laser lead extraction.