How to perform posterior wall isolation in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation has become standard of care in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Although there have been significant advances in our understanding and technology, a substantial proportion of patients have ongoing AF requiring repeat procedures. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of AF ablation; however, it is less effective in patients with persistent as opposed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) is commonly performed as an adjunct to PVI in patients with persistent AF with nonrandomized studies showing improved outcomes. Anatomical considerations and detailed outline of the various approaches and techniques to performing PWI are detailed, and advantages and pitfalls to assist the clinical electrophysiologist successfully and safely complete PWI are described.     

Our approach to persistent atrial fibrillation in the setting of pulmonary vein isolation

In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) despite durable pulmonary vein isolation, there are a variety of approaches to further ablation. Here we summarize our strategy in this population. In brief, our approach is to isolate the posterior wall, ablate the coronary sinus musculature and left lateral ridge, complete a lateral mitral line, and achieve cavotricuspid isthmus block. Subsequently, we target organized atrial flutters and if AF persists, we ablate areas of long, fractionated electrograms within scarred regions. We administer isuprel in patients with a presentation consistent with triggered atrial fibrillation (low scar burden, paroxysms of AF).     

Approach to ablative management of patient with persistent atrial fibrillation and enduring pulmonary vein isolation

Enduring isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) is becoming increasingly common in patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. We describe our approach to ablation strategy in a patient with enduring isolation of PV and briefly discuss the role of non‐PV triggers.     

Left atrial flutter after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation

We report an arrhythmic complication in two patients in whom a procedure directed at isolating one or two pulmonary veins had been performed. The complication was related to pulmonary vein disconnection scars after ablation. Both patients developed new clinical tachycardia (atypical atrial flutter) secondary to a reentrant phenomena in the vicinity of a previously ablated pulmonary vein.     

Is pulmonary vein isolation enough for persistent atrial fibrillation?

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well‐established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, studies report suboptimal outcomes in persistent AF. Adjuvant ablation targeting the substrate outside the pulmonary veins has been proposed to improve the success rates of the procedure. In this review, we summarize the current evidence regarding additional ablation over PVI in persistent AF. We describe the different approaches for adjuvant ablation, outcomes, and future perspectives.     

Persistent atrial fibrillation; It is time to regroup

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the only proven ablation strategy for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, when AF recurs despite durable PVI in a subgroup of patients with persistent AF, there is no scientifically proven ablation strategy to pursue. Here, we summarized how we approach persistent AF at Johns Hopkins Hospital.     

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation initiated by pulmonary vein ectopic beats

Ectopic beats from the pulmonary veins (PVs) have been demonstrated to initiate atrial fibrillation (AF). This article describes the conceptual approach to mapping, interpretation of different electrograms, and ablation of AF initiated by PV ectopic beats.     

Prevalence of asymptomatic recurrences of atrial fibrillation after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation

INTRODUCTION: The long-term efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been based on patient-reported symptoms suggestive of AF. However, asymptomatic recurrences of AF may remain undetected. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic recurrences of AF after an apparently successful catheter ablation procedure for AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 244 consecutive patients (mean age 53 +/- 11 years) who underwent a pulmonary vein isolation procedure for symptomatic paroxysmal AF and who reported no symptoms of recurrent AF at > or =6 months after the procedure, 60 patients with a history of > or =1 episode of AF per week were asked to participate in this study. Preablation, these patients had experienced 19 +/- 13 episodes of AF per month. The patients were provided with a patient-activated transtelephonic event recorder for 30 days, a mean of 642 +/- 195 days after the ablation procedure, and were asked to record and transmit recordings on a daily basis and whenever they felt palpitations. Seven patients (12%) felt palpitations during the study, although they had not experienced symptoms previously. Each of these 7 patients had an episode of AF documented with the event monitor during symptoms. In these 7 patients, the mean number of episodes per month decreased from 19 +/- 14 preablation to 3 +/- 1 postablation (P < 0.001). Among the 53 asymptomatic patients, an episode of AF was captured in 1 (2%) patient during the study period. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic recurrences of AF after an apparently successful catheter ablation procedure for symptomatic paroxysmal AF are infrequent.     

Substrate modification by pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial linear ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: its impact on complex-fractionated atrial electrograms

PV and Linear Ablation for CFAEs . Introduction: Linear ablations in the left atrium (LA), in addition to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, have been demonstrated to be an effective ablation strategy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). This study investigated the impact of LA linear ablation on the complex‐fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) of PsAF patients. Methods and Results: A total of 40 consecutive PsAF patients (age: 54 ± 10 years, 39 males) who underwent catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. Linear ablation of both roofline between the right and left superior PVs and the mitral isthmus line joining from the mitral annulus to the left inferior PV were performed following PV isolation during AF. High‐density automated CFAE mapping was performed using the NAVX, and maps were obtained 3 times during the procedure (prior to ablation, after PV isolation, and after linear ablations) and were compared. PsAF was terminated by ablation in 13 of 40 patients. The mean total LA surface area and baseline CFAEs area were 120.8 ± 23.6 and 88.0 ± 23.5 cm² (74.2%), respectively. After PV isolation and linear ablations in the LA, the area of CFAEs area was reduced to 71.6 ± 22.6 cm² (58.7%) (P < 0.001) and 44.9 ± 23.0 cm² (39.2%) (P < 0.001), respectively. The LA linear ablations resulted in a significant reduction of the CFAEs area percentage in the region remote from ablation sites (from 56.3 ± 20.6 cm² (59.6%) to 40.4 ± 16.5 cm² (42.9%), P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Both PV isolation and LA linear ablations diminished the CFAEs in PsAF patients, suggesting substrate modification by PV and linear ablations. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 962‐970, September 2012)     

Predictors of recurrence following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using an irrigated-tip ablation catheter

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to identify predictors of recurrence after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and to report the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of AF using an irrigated-tip ablation catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-five consecutive patients (51 men [68%]; age 54 +/- 13 years) with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal (42 patients), persistent (21 patients), or permanent (12 patients) AF underwent catheter ablation of AF using an irrigated-tip ablation catheter and a standard ablation strategy, which involved electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins (PVs) and creation of a cavotricuspid linear lesion. At 10.5 +/- 7.5 months of follow-up following a single (n = 75) or redo ablation procedure (n = 11), 39 (52%) of the 75 patients were free of AF, 10 were improved (13%), and 26 had experienced no benefit from the ablation procedure (35%). Seventy-six percent of patients with paroxysmal AF were free from recurrent AF. The most significant complications were two episodes of pericardial tamponade, mitral valve injury in one patient, two strokes, and complete but asymptomatic PV stenosis in one patient. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression analysis identified the presence of persistent AF, permanent AF, and age >50 years prior to the ablation are the only independent predictors of AF recurrence after the first PV isolation procedure. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of AF using a strategy involving isolation of all PVs and creation of a linear lesion in the cavotricuspid isthmus using cooled radiofrequency energy is associated with moderate efficacy and an important risk for complications. The best results of this procedure are achieved in the subset of patients who are younger than 50 years and have only paroxysmal AF.     

Mechanical esophageal displacement during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Esophageal Deviation in AF Ablation. Objective: To determine the feasibility and safety of esophageal displacement during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, to prevent thermal injury. Background: Patients undergoing AF ablation are at risk of esophageal thermal injury, which ranges from superficial ulceration, to gastroparesis, to the rare but catastrophic atrioesophageal fistula. A common approach to avoid damage is luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring; however, (1) temperature rises mandate interruptions in energy delivery that interrupt workflow and potentially decrease procedural efficacy, and (2) esophageal fistulas have been reported even with LET monitoring. Methods: A cohort of 20 consecutive patients undergoing radiofrequency (RF) (16 patients) or laser balloon (4 patients) ablation of AF under general anesthesia. After barium instillation, the esophagus was deviated using an endotracheal stylet placed within a thoracic chest tube. LET monitoring was used during catheter ablation. Upper GI endoscopy was performed prior to discharge. Results: At the pulmonary vein level, leftward deviation measured 2.8 ± 1.6 cm (range: 0.4–5.7) and rightward deviation 2.8 ± 1.8 cm (range: 0.5–4.9). The temperature rose to >38.5 °C in 3/20 (15%) patients. In these 3 patients, there was an average of 2 applications/patient that recorded temperatures >38.5 °C. No patient had a temperature rise > 40 °C. Endoscopy revealed no esophageal ulceration from thermal injury in 18/19 (95%) patients; the sole patient with a thermally mediated ulceration had an unusual esophageal diverticulum fully across the posterior left atrium. Twelve patients (63%) exhibited trauma related to instrumentation with no clinical sequelae. Conclusions: Mechanical esophageal deviation is feasible and allows for uninterrupted energy delivery along the posterior wall during catheter ablation of AF. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 147‐154, February 2012)     

Increased resting heart rate following radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

AIM: Sinus tachycardia has been observed following radiofrequency(RF) catheter ablation for various kinds of supraventriculartachycardia. This study is aimed at determining the occurrenceof changes in sinus-rhythm heart rate (HR) after pulmonary vein(PV) isolation in patients with paroxysmal/persistent atrialfibrillation (AF), prospectively. METHODS: Patients with a history of AF underwent segmental or circumferentialisolation of the PVs. A total of 62 consecutive patients, meanage 55 10, was included. Clinical evaluation was performedbefore and one, three, six, nine, and 12 months following theprocedure. RESULTS: Following PV isolation, the mean HR significantly increasedfrom 58 10 bpm at baseline to 67 12 bpm at one month, 71 13 bpm at three months, 69 12 bpm at six months, 69 13at nine months, and 70 13 at 12 months follow-up. The ablationsuccess significantly correlated with the increase in HR atone month follow-up. In three patients the mean HR increased> 25 bpm resulting in symptoms necessitating therapy withrate-controlling drugs. CONCLUSION: PV isolation in patients with AF may result in increased HR,which positively correlated with the ablation success. Thischange does not seem to resolve spontaneously after a follow-upof 12 months. Approximately 5% of patients may develop symptomsdue to an increased HR, necessitating treatment with rate-controllingdrugs.     

Double multielectrode mapping catheters facilitate radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation originating from pulmonary veins

INTRODUCTION: Several reports have demonstrated that focal atrial fibrillation (AF) may arise from pulmonary veins (PVs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of using double multielectrode mapping catheters in ablation of focal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two patients (30 men, 12 women, age 65+/-14 years) with frequent attacks of paroxysmal AF were referred for catheter ablation. After atrial transseptal procedure, two long sheaths were put into the left atrium. Two decapolar catheters were put into the right superior PV (RSPV) and left superior PV (LSPV), or inferior PVs if necessary, guided by pulmonary venography. All the patients had spontaneous initiation of AF either during baseline (2 patients), after isoproterenol infusion (8 patients) or high-dose adenosine (2 patients), after short duration burst pacing under isoproterenol (14 patients), or after cardioversion of pacing-induced AF (16 patients). The trigger points of AF were from the LSPV (12 patients), RSPV (8 patients), and both superior PVs (19 patients). The trigger points from PVs (total 61 points) were 18 (30%) in the ostium of PVs and 43 inside the PVs (9 to 40 mm). After 6+/-3 applications of radiofrequency energy, 57 of 61 triggers were completely eliminated, and the other 4 triggers were partially eliminated. During a follow-up period of 8+/-2 months, 37 patients (88%) were free of symptomatic AF without any antiarrhythmic drugs. Twenty patients received a transesophageal echocardiogram, and 19 showed small atrial septal defects (2.8+/-1.2 mm) with trivial shunt. Fifteen defects closed spontaneously 1 month later. CONCLUSION: The technique using double multielectrode mapping catheters is a relatively safe and highly effective method for mapping and ablation of focal AF originating from PVs.