Recipient-donor race mismatch for African American liver transplant patients with chronic hepatitis C

African American (AA) recipient-donor race mismatch has been associated with graft loss and mortality, but studies of an association between race mismatch and hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease severity are lacking. HCV-infected adults from 4 US centers who underwent liver transplantation for the first time (n = 1093) were followed for a median of 3.05 years to determine the rates of advanced HCV disease (bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis) and graft failure; 11% of the patients were AA. The unadjusted cumulative rate of advanced fibrosis was higher in AAs than non-AAs (56% and 40% at 4 years, respectively, (P < 0.01), and 59% and 56% for AA recipient-donor-matched patients and AA recipient-donor-mismatched patients, respectively (P = 0.89). In adjusted models, both AA recipient race [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.06-2.03, P = 0.02] and AA recipient-donor mismatch (versus match; HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.03-2.12, P = 0.03) were significant predictors of advanced fibrosis; other independent predictors were donor age (HR = 1.21, P < 0.01) and cytomegalovirus infection (HR = 1.55, P < 0.01). The 4-year unadjusted cumulative rates for HCV-associated graft loss were 10% and 17% for non-AAs and AAs, respectively (P < 0.01), and 0% and 21% for AA recipient-donor-matched patients and AA recipient-donor-mismatched patients, respectively (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, AA recipient-donor-mismatched patients had a 62% higher rate of graft loss than non-AA recipients (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.14-2.29, P < 0.01), and AA recipient-donor-matched patients had a 76% lower rate of graft loss/mortality (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.06-0.97, P = 0.05). In conclusion, AA recipient-donor-mismatched patients who are infected with HCV are at high risk for advanced HCV disease and HCV-related graft loss and constitute a patient group that will benefit from new therapeutic strategies for preventing graft loss.     

Use of hepatitis C virus-positive grafts in liver transplantation: a single-centre experience

AIM: Our goal was to evaluate the outcome of HCV(+) recipients after liver transplantation (LT) using HCV(+) donors and the interaction between donor and recipient viral strain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 21 LT performed between 1998 and 2004 using livers from HCV(+) donors in HCV(+) recipients. Two hundred thirty-seven patients with HCV cirrhosis who underwent LT with livers from HCV(-) donors were the control group. Ishak score (IS) was evaluated for all HCV(+) grafts. The considered variables included donor age, hepatic enzymes, intensive care unit stay, HCV genotype, ischemia time, recipient age, UNOS status, Child score, HCV genotype (before and 6 months after LT) and IS (after LT). We analyzed patient, graft, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: HCV(+) donors were significantly older than HCV(-) donors. The cumulative 5-year patient and graft survivals and disease free intervals were not different between groups. IS grading was more than 2/18 in two cases; the only graft with a staging score over 2/6 was retransplanted for early nonfunction. In two cases, different HCV genotypes were matched and donor strain took over the recipient strain. In one patient, donor genotyping 2a-2c took over recipient genotyping 1b and 9 months after LT recurrent hepatitis was documented, but antiviral therapy cleared HCV. CONCLUSIONS: Livers from HCV(+) donors can safely be used in HCV(+) recipients. Hepatic biopsy must always be performed; livers with bridging fibrosis should not be used. The takeover of one strain by another may change the prognosis of the patient if the predominant strain is more sensitive to antiviral therapy.     

Impact of donor age and year of transplantation on graft and patient survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has become the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT). Graft and patient survival are adversely affected by recurrent infection of the graft. Recent publications have described an inferior outcome for recently transplanted HCV patients and have highlighted the impact of advancing donor age on severity of recurrent HCV. The donor age at which a measurable impact on graft and patient outcome can be observed has not clearly been defined. In addition, the impact of donor age on graft and patient survival for non-HCV patients needs to be examined. METHODS: We have examined a large European liver transplant database to define the impact of transplantation date and donor age on graft and patient survival for HCV patients (n = 4,736) and the impact for a comparison group of transplanted alcoholic liver disease patients (ALD, n = 5,406). RESULTS: For the entire cohorts, graft and patient survival of HCV patients was inferior to ALD patients. Since 1987, there has been a steady and ongoing improvement in the outcome of transplanted ALD patients, an improvement not observed for HCV patients. Every year since 1989, there has been an increase in liver donor age. Graft and patient survival for both ALD and HCV cohorts was adversely affected by advancing donor age. Comparison of graft and patient survival for HCV and ALD cohorts was made according to donor age (donor age subgrouped <20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60 and >60 years of age). For donors younger than 40 years of age, HCV and ALD recipient graft and patient survival are not significantly different. For donors older than 40, HCV recipient graft survival is inferior to ALD graft survival, an inferiority that increases for each advancing decade of donor age. For donors older than 50 years, HCV recipient patient survival is inferior to ALD patient survival, an inferiority that increases when the donor age is greater than 60 years. CONCLUSION: The results of liver transplantation for European HCV patients is inferior to a comparison group of ALD patients, and have not improved during the past 15 years. Liver donor age has increased significantly during that period. Advancing donor age has an adverse influence on graft and patient survival for ALD and HCV patients, but a significantly greater impact is observed for HCV patients when the donor is older than 40 years.     

Liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis: improved survival in recent years and increased severity of recurrent disease in female recipients: results of a long term retrospective study.

In recent years, a worsening outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive recipients and a faster progression of recurrent disease to overt cirrhosis has been reported. Our aims were to 1) assess patient survival and development of severe recurrent disease (Ishak fibrosis score > 3) in different transplant years; and 2) model the effects of pre- and post-liver transplantation (LT) variables on the severity of recurrent disease. A multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted on 502 consecutive HCV-positive transplant recipients between January 1990 and December 2002. Protocol liver biopsies were obtained at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 yr post-LT in almost 90% of the patients. All 502 patients were included in the overall survival analysis, while only the 354 patients with a follow-up longer than 1 yr were considered for the analysis of predictors of disease progression. The overall Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 78.7%, 66.3%, and 58.6%, at 12, 60, and 120 months, respectively, and a trend for a better patient survival over the years emerged from all 3 centers. The cumulative probability of developing HCV-related recurrent severe fibrosis (Ishak score 4-6) in the cohort of 354 patients who survived at least 1 yr remained unchanged over the years. Multivariate analysis indicated that older donors (P = 0.0001) and female gender of recipient (P = 0.02) were the 2 major risk factors for the development of severe recurrent disease, while the adoption of antilymphocytic preparations was associated with a less aggressive course (P = 0.03). Two of these prognostic factors, donor age and recipient gender, are easily available before LT and their combination showed an important synergy, such that a female recipient not only had a much higher probability of severe recurrent disease than a male recipient but her risk increased with the increasing age of the donor, reaching almost 100% when the age of the donor was 60 or older. In conclusion, a trend for a better patient survival was observed in more recent years but the cumulative probability of developing severe recurrent disease remained unchanged. The combination of a female recipient receiving an older graft emerged as a strong risk factor for a severe recurrence.     

Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts.

Studies have suggested that the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive (HCV+) donor allografts has no impact on survival. However, no studies have examined the effect that HCV+ donor histology has upon recipient and graft survival. We evaluated the clinical outcome and impact of histological features in HCV patients transplanted using HCV+ livers. We reviewed all patients transplanted for HCV at our institution from 1988 to 2004; 39 received HCV+ allografts and 580 received HCV-negative (HCV-) allografts. Survival curves compared graft and patient survival. Each HCV+ allograft was stringently matched to a control of HCV- graft recipients. No significant difference in survival was noted between recipients of HCV+ livers and controls. Patients receiving HCV+ allografts from older donors (age > or =50 yr) had higher rates of graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.74) and death rates (hazard ratio, 2.63) compared to HCV- allograft recipients receiving similarly-aged older donor livers. Matched case-control analysis revealed that recipients of HCV+ allografts had more severe fibrosis post-liver transplantation than recipients of HCV- livers (P = 0.008). More advanced fibrosis was observed in HCV+ grafts from older donors compared to HCV+ grafts from younger donors (P = 0.012). In conclusion, recipients of HCV+ grafts from older donors have higher rates of death and graft failure, and develop more extensive fibrosis than HCV- graft recipients from older donors. Recipients of HCV+ grafts, regardless of donor age, develop more advanced liver fibrosis than recipients of HCV- grafts.     

One-year protocol liver biopsy can stratify fibrosis progression in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C infection.

Determinants of progression to cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have been well described in the immunocompetent population but remain poorly defined in liver transplant (LT) recipients. This cohort study determines the factors contributing to the development of fibrosis and its rate of progression in the allograft. Predictive factors analyzed include: demographics, host and donor factors, surgery-related variables (cold and warm ischemia time), rejection episodes, cytomegalovirus infection (CMV), and immunosuppression. Over 12 years, 842 adult LTs were performed at our institution; 358 for the indication of HCV. A total of 264 patients underwent protocol liver biopsies at month 4 and yearly after LT. Using the modified Knodell system of Ishak for staging fibrosis, the median fibrosis progression rate was .8 units/year (P < .001). Rapid fibrosis progression (> .8 units/year) was best identified by liver histology performed at 1 year. Donor age > 55 years was associated with rapid fibrosis progression and development of cirrhosis (P < .001). In contrast, donor age < 35 years was associated with slower progression of fibrosis (P = .003). Risk factors for graft loss due to recurrent HCV included recipient age > 35 years (P = .01), donor age > 55 years (P = .005), and use of female donor allografts (P = .03). In conclusion, fibrosis progression in HCV-infected LT recipients occurs at a rate of .8 units/year. Increased donor age has a major impact on disease progression, graft failure, and patient survival. A liver biopsy performed at 1 year posttransplant can help identify those patients more likely to develop progressive disease and may allow better targeting of antiviral therapy.     

Impact of Donor Age on the Results of Liver Transplantation in Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Recipients

Objective

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-cirrhosis is the most frequent indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) among adults in most European and American transplant centers. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of donor age on graft survival among HCV-positive cirrhotic transplant patients.

Materials and Methods

We performed an observational, retrospective study between March 1997 and December 2004, analyzing 340 liver transplantations. The patients were divided into 4 groups, considering whether the HCV infection was the indication for OLT and whether the age of the donor was older or younger than 48 years: group 1 (HCV, <48 years); group 2 (HCV, >48 years); group 3 (non-HCV, <48 years); and group 4 (non-HCV, >48 years).

Results

A univariate analysis showed that posttransplantation graft survival was clearly influenced by recipient HCV serologic status (P = .018). However, no graft survival differences were found when the analysis variable was age (>48 or <48 years). When both variables were studied, a positive HCV serology did not modify graft survival when the donor age was <48 years (P = .32), but had a statistically significant negative impact when the age was >48 years (P = .02).

Conclusions

The use of older donors for HCV recipients resulted in worse graft and patient survivals in our study. This difference in survival was not present in non-HCV recipients or when grafts for HCV recipients were procured from younger donors. Donor age <30 years was a protective factor for graft survival among HCV recipients.     

Improving Outcomes of Liver Retransplantation: An Analysis of Trends and the Impact of Hepatitis C Infection

Retransplantation (RT) in Hepatitis C (HCV) patients remains controversial. Aims: To study trends in RT and evaluate the impact of HCV status in the context of a comprehensive recipient and donor risk assessment. The UNOS database between 1994 and October 2005 was utilized to analyze 46  982 LT and RT. Graft and patient survival along with patient and donor characteristics were compared for 2283 RT performed in HCV and non-HCV patients during 1994–1997, 1998–2001 and 2002–October 2005. Overall HCV prevalence at RT increased from 36% in the initial period to 40.6% after 2002. In our study group, 1-year patient and graft survival post-RT improved over the same time intervals from 65.0% to 70.7% and 54.87% to 65.8%, respectively. HCV was only associated with decreased patient and graft survival with a retransplant (LT-RT) interval (RI) >90 days. Independent predictors of mortality for RT with RI >90 days were patient age, MELD score >25, RI <1 year, warm ischemia time ≥75 min and donor age ≥60 (significant for HCV patients only). Outcomes of RT are improving, but can be optimized by weighing recipient factors, anticipation of operative factors and donor selection.     

Optimizing Outcome of Recurrent Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4 After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Moving Forward by Looking Back

Purpose

Recurrence of HCV after LDLT is almost universal. Different factors affect response to treatment. Few data are available regarding outcome of recurrent HCV genotype 4. The purpose of this study is to improve outcome of recurrent HCV genotype 4 after LDLT.

Methods

An IRB approved chart review of 243 patients transplanted for ESLD, HCV genotype 4 over 4 years were reviewed. Protocol liver biopsies were taken 6 months after transplant. Patients received pegylated interferon and ribavirin in case of histological recurrence. Five patients had FCH were excluded.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were included. Sustained Virological Response (SVR) was achieved in 29 (78.3%). Patients with Metavir fibrosis stage (F0) and (F1) had SVR in 5/5 (100%) and 20/24 (83.3%). Two patients with F1 had to stop treatment because of thrombocytopenia and 2 were non responders. Three out of 6 patients (50%) with (F2) had SVR, 2 were non responders and one had to discontinue treatment because of severe depression. One of 2 patients (50%) with F3 had SVR and the other patient decompensated within 4 months before treatment and died.

Conclusion

Protocol biopsies allow early detection of inflammatory changes in the graft before fibrosis occurs. Early treatment of recurrent HCV genotype 4 after LDLT results in better response.     

The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Fibrosis Progression in Patients Transplanted for Hepatitis C

Despite the recognition of numerous factors for aggressive hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) our understanding of this phenomenon is incomplete. We tested the hypothesis that diabetes mellitus (DM) was implicated. One hundred sixty-three patients undergoing primary LT for HCV from 1990 to 2004 were evaluated and biopsies were scored according to the modified Ishak score. Severe recurrence of HCV was defined as a fibrosis score > or = 4 within 6 years of LT. Risk factors assessed included recipient, donor and transplant variables. Fifty-four patients (33.1%) had a fibrosis score > or = 4 at the end of the study period. Factors associated with progression to severe fibrosis was donor age (p = 0.008) especially donor age >55 (p = 0.038, HR 2.43), pre-LT DM (p = 0.039, HR 2.68) and DM post-LT (p = 0.004, HR 3.28). The combination of receiving a liver from a donor older than 55 years and having DM post-LT was associated with an 8.38-fold risk of progression to severe fibrosis (p = 0.000124) when compared to patients not diabetic post-LT who received livers from donors aged <55 years. These data indicate that diabetic status is one of the more important variables determining the severity of HCV recurrence and is synergistic with donor age. This observation may provide an additional management opportunity to modify the impact of HCV recurrence.     

Outcome of living donor liver transplantation for Egyptian patients with hepatitis C (genotype 4)-related cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) represents a challenging issue due to universal viral recurrence and invasion into the graft, although the incidence of histological recurrence, risk factors, and survival rates are still controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recurrence of HCV was studied in 38 of 53 adult patients who underwent LDLT. RESULTS: Recipient and graft survivals were 86.6% at the end of the follow-up which was comparable to literature reports for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Clinical HCV recurrence was observed in 10/38 patients (26.3%). Four patients developed mild fibrosis with a mean fibrosis score of 0.6 and mean grade of histological activity index (HAI) of 7.1. None of the recipients developed allograft cirrhosis during the mean follow-up period of 16 +/- 8.18 months (range, 4-35 months). Estimated and actual graft volumes were negatively correlated with the incidence and early clinical HCV recurrence. None of the other risk factors were significantly correlated with clinical HCV recurrence: gender, donor and recipient ages, pretransplantation Child-Pugh or model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, pre- and postoperative viremia, immunosuppressive drugs, pulse steroid therapy, and preoperative anti-HBc status. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative patient and graft survival rates for HCV (genotype 4)-related cirrhosis were more or less comparable to DDLT reported in the literature. Clinical HCV recurrence after LDLT in our study was low. Small graft volume was a significant risk factor for HCV recurrence. A longer follow-up and a larger number of patients are required to clarify these issues.     

Histologic recurrence of chronic hepatitis C virus in patients after living donor and deceased donor liver transplantation.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurs in nearly all patients after liver transplantation. This recurrence is associated with progressive fibrosis and graft loss. It remains unclear whether the natural course of HCV recurrence is altered in patients who undergo living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We conducted a prospective, controlled trial using protocol liver biopsies to evaluate the histologic outcome of recurrent HCV in 23 patients who underwent LDLT and 53 patients who underwent transplantation with a deceased donor liver (DDLT) during the same period of time. Patients who did not survive at least 6 months after transplantation or who had hepatocellular carcinoma or any other coexistent liver disease were excluded from analysis. All patients underwent protocol liver biopsy at 6 months and at 12 months and at yearly intervals thereafter. The mean age, sex, racial distribution, and serum HCV RNA and the percentage of patients with genotype 1 were similar in the 2 groups of patients. The model for end-stage liver disease score at the time of transplantation was slightly lower in patients who underwent LDLT, but this difference was not significant. The distribution of immunosuppression agents used, the mean doses of calcineurin agents, the use of mycophenolate mofetil, and the dose and tapering schedule for prednisone were similar in both groups of patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 40 months. No significant difference in either graft or patient survival or the percentage of patients who developed acute rejection was noted in the 2 groups of patients. At 48 months, graft and patient survival were 82% and 82% and 75% and 79% for patients who underwent DDLT and LDLT, respectively. The degree of hepatic inflammation increased stepwise over 3 years but was not significantly different in the 2 patient groups. In contrast, the mean fibrosis score and the percentage of patients with fibrosis increased stepwise after DDLT but appeared to plateau 12 months after LDLT. At 36 months, fibrosis was present in 78% of DDLT patients, and mean fibrosis score was 1.9, compared with 59% with fibrosis and a mean score of.9 after LDLT. In conclusion, these data strongly suggest that fibrosis progression from recurrent HCV is not more severe in patients after LDLT.     

A 7-gene signature of the recipient predicts the progression of fibrosis after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus infection

Fibrosis recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a universal event and strongly determines a patient's prognosis. The recipient risk factors for fibrosis recurrence are still poorly defined. Here we assess a genetic risk score as a predictor of fibrosis after LT. The cirrhosis risk score (CRS), which comprises allele variants in 7 genes (adaptor-related protein complex 3 S2, aquaporin 2, antizyme inhibitor 1, degenerative spermatocyte homolog 1 lipid desaturase, syntaxin binding protein 5-like, toll-like receptor 4, and transient receptor potential cation channel M5), was calculated for 137 patients who underwent LT for HCV infection and experienced HCV reinfection of the graft. The patients were stratified into 3 CRS categories: <0.5, 0.5 to 0.7, and >0.7. All patients underwent protocol biopsy after LT (median follow-up = 5 years), and liver fibrosis was assessed according to the Desmet and Scheuer score. The data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses. The results showed that the highest CRS category was strongly associated with the presence of F2 or F3 fibrosis in protocol biopsy samples 1, 3, and 5 years after LT (P = 0.006, P = 0.001, and P = 0.02, respectively). Overall, 75.0% of the patients with a CRS > 0.7 developed at least F2 fibrosis, whereas 51.5% developed F3 fibrosis during follow-up. The predictive value of the CRS for fibrosis progression was independent of known clinical risk factors, including the age of the donor, the sex of the recipient, and the occurrence of acute rejection. A Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed the prognostic value of the CRS with respect to the recurrence of severe liver fibrosis in HCV-infected patients after LT (log rank = 6.23, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the genetic signature of the recipient predicts the likelihood of severe liver fibrosis in the graft after HCV recurrence. The CRS might help with early clinical decision making (eg, the selection of patients for antiviral therapy after LT).     

Effect of Donor Ethnicity on Kidney Survival in Different Recipient Pairs: An Analysis of the OPTN/UNOS Database

Background

Previous multivariate analysis performed between April 1, 1994, and December 31, 2000 from the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database has shown that kidneys from black donors were associated with lower graft survival. We compared graft and patient survival of different kidney donor-to-recipient ethnic combinations to see if this result still holds on a recent cohort of US kidney transplants.

Methods

We included 72,495 recipients of deceased and living donor kidney alone transplants from 2001 to 2005. A multivariate Cox regression method was used to analyze the effect of donor–recipient ethnicity on graft and patient survival within 5 years of transplant, and to adjust for the effect of other donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics. Results are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with the 95% confidence limit (CL) and P values.

Results

Adjusted HRs of donor–recipient patient survival were: white to white (1); and white to black (1.22; P = .001). Graft survival HRs were black to black (1.40; P <.001); black to white (1.35; P <.001); black to Hispanic (0.87; P = .18); and black to Asian (0.69; P =.05).

Summary

Black donor kidneys are associated with significantly lower graft survival when transplanted into whites or blacks and are only associated with lower patient survival when these kidneys are transplanted into white recipients. The graft and patient survival rates for Asian and Latino/Hispanic recipients, however, were not affected by donor ethnicity. This analysis underscores the need for research to better understand the reasons for these disparities and how to improve the posttransplant graft survival rates of black kidney recipients.     

Survival and Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence After Liver Transplantation in HIV- and Hepatitis C Virus-Coinfected Patients: Experience in a Single Center

Introduction

Posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence has been shown to negatively impact graft and patient survivals. It has been suggested that HCV recurrence among HIV- and HCV-coinfected transplant recipients is even more aggressive.

Objective

To compare the histological severity and survival of posttransplant HCV recurrence between HIV- and HCV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients.

Patients and methods

Among 72 adult patients who underwent primary liver transplantation at our institution for HCV-related cirrhosis between October 2001 and April 2007. We excluded one coinfected patient who died on postoperative day 5 leaving 12 HIV- and HCV-coinfected patients for comparison with 59 monoinfected patients. When listed, all coinfected patients fulfilled the criteria of the Spanish Consensus Document for transplantation in HIV patients. Immunosuppression did not differ between the two groups: all were treated with tacrolimus + steroids (slow tapering). Aggressive HCV recurrence was defined as cholestatic hepatitis and/or a fibrosis grade ≥2 during the first posttransplant year.

Results

Coinfected patients were younger than monoinfected patients: 45 ± 6 years vs 55 ± 9 years (P = .0008). There were no differences in Child score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, donor age, graft steatosis, ischemia time, HCV pretransplant viral load or genotype between the groups. Significant rejection episodes were also equally distributed (25% vs 14%; P = .38). Seven coinfected patients and 29 monoinfected patients developed aggressive HCV recurrences (58% vs 49%; P = .75). Median follow-up was 924 days. Global survival at 3 years was 80%. Survivals at 1, 2, and 3 years were 83%, 75%, 62% in the coinfected vs 98%, 89%, 84% in the monoinfected patients, respectively (log-rank test = 0.09).

Conclusions

The severity of histological recurrence was similar among HIV- and HCV-coinfected and monoinfected HCV liver recipients in the first posttransplant year. Mortality attributed to recurrent HCV was similar in the groups. There were no short-term (3-year) differences in survival between the two groups of patients.     

Outcomes of liver transplantation in simultaneously hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus RNA positive recipients: the deleterious effect of donor hepatitis B core antibody positivity

Background

Recent data from Italian studies have shown excellent results of liver transplantation (LT) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients with grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)—positive donors, whereas such grafts in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients have displayed poorer outcomes. We investigated the results of LT with HBcAb-positive grafts in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfections.

Methods

From August 1999 to December 2009, we performed 27 adult primary LTs from deceased heart-beating donors into recipients showing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)- and HCV-RNA-positivity simultaneously: 12 patients received a graft from an HBsAg-negative HBcAb-positive donor (core+D group) and 15 from an HBcAb-negative donor (core−D group). Immunosuppression included a calcineurin inhibitor, antimetabolite and steroids which were suspended at 6 months. Anti-HBV prophylaxis was always perfomed with anti-HBs immunoglobulins and nucleos(t)idic analogues.

Results

The groups were similar regarding variables of donor, recipient, donor-recipient match, LT procedure, and acute rejection treatment. Median follow-up for surviving grafts was 67 months (range, 16-141). Among all patients, HCV-RNA remained positive after LT. The prevalence of histologically proven recurrent HCV hepatitis was similar in the 2 groups: 83% core+D vs 73% core−D. No recurrent HBV hepatitis occurred during the follow-up. Graft survival at 5 years was significantly lower in the core+D group (core+D 48% vs core−D 87%; P = .018), in which a significantly higher prevalence of graft loss was caused by HCV recurrence (core+D 5/12, 42% vs core−D 1/15, 7%; P = .03). All of the 5 core+D patients who lost their grafts due to HCV recurrence did not receive anti-HCV therapy (4 owing to an aggressive disease and 1 because of patient refusal).

Conclusions

Outcomes of LT in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfection are adversely affected by donor HBcAb positivity, an effect that is mainly mediated by the dismal course of HCV recurrence after LT.     

Factors differentially correlated with the outcome of liver transplantation in hcv+ and HCV- recipients

BACKGROUND: Survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is significantly poorer than for liver transplants performed for other causes of chronic liver disease. The factors responsible for the inferior outcome in HCV+ recipients, and whether they differ from factors associated with survival in HCV- recipients, are unknown. METHODS: The UNOS database was analyzed to identify factors associated with outcome in HCV+ and HCV- recipients. Kaplan-Meier graft and patient survival and Cox proportional hazards analysis were conducted on 13,026 liver transplants to identify the variables that were differentially associated with outcome survival in HCV- and HCV+ recipients. RESULTS: Of the 13,026 recipients, 7386 (56.7%) were HCV- and 5640 were HCV+. In HCV- and HCV+ recipient populations, five-year patient survival rates were 83.5% vs. 74.6% (P<0.00001) and five-year graft survival rates 80.6% vs. 69.9% (P<0.00001), respectively. In a multivariate regression model, donor age and recipient creatinine were observed to be significant covariates in both groups, while donor race, cold ischemia time (CIT), female to male transplants, and recipient albumin were independent predictors of survival of HCV- recipients. In the HCV+ cohort, recipient race, warm ischemia time (WIT), and diabetes also independently predicted graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: A number of parameters are differentially correlated with outcome in HCV- and HCV+ recipients of orthotopic liver transplantation. These findings may not only have practical implications in the selection and management of liver transplant patients, but also may shed new insight into the biology of HCV infection posttransplant.     

Risk Factors for Development of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and Progressive Impairment of Glucose Metabolism After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) has a negative impact on graft and patient survivals. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, high body mass index, increased donor and recipient ages, and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) type have been identified as risk factors for the development of NODM. We aimed to elucidate the risk factors for the development of NODM and those for progressive glucose intolerance in adult living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients.

Methods

We collected data from 188 primary liver transplant recipients (age > 16 years) who underwent LDLT from June 1991 to December 2011 at Hiroshima University Hospital. Risk factors for NODM and progressive impairment of glucose metabolism in pre-transplantation diabetes mellitus (DM) recipients were examined.

Results

Pre-transplantation DM was diagnosed in 32 recipients (19.3%). The overall incidence of NODM was 6.0% (8/134 recipients). Multivariate analysis revealed that old recipient age (≥55 years) is a unique predictive risk factor for developing NODM. The incident of pre-transplantation DM was significantly higher in recipients with HCV infection than in those without HCV. A high pre-transplantation triglyceride level was an independent risk factor for progressive impairment of glucose tolerance among 32 LDLT recipients with pre-transplantation DM. All of the NODM patients were being treated with tacrolimus at the time of diagnosis. Switching the CNI from tacrolimus to cyclosporine allowed one-half of the patients (4/8) to withdraw from insulin-dependent therapy. NODM and post-transplantation glucose intolerance had no negative impact on patient and graft outcomes.

Conclusions

Older age of the recipient (≥55 years) was a significant risk factor for NODM. Hypertriglyceridemia in the recipients with DM is an independent risk factor for post-transplantation progressive impairment of glucose metabolism. NODM had no negative impact on outcomes in the LDLT recipients.     

Spontaneous Clearance of HCV in HIV-Hepatitis C Virus Coinfected Liver Transplant Patients: Prospective Study

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance is an independent predictive factor for long-term survival in HIV-HCV liver transplantation patients. After 46 months of antiviral therapy it is achieved in up to 80% of cases. Little is known, however, about spontaneous viral clearance. We performed prospective study of HIV-HCV coinfected liver transplant patients.

Methods

Between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2011, we analyzed the parameters from among HIV-HCV coinfected liver transplant patients of donor and recipient ages, transplant cause, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, donor and recipient serology, transplant date, viral load before and after transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy, HCV recurrence, HCV viral clearance (spontaneous and duration), retransplant cause, and viral load before and after retransplant, as well as survival.

Results

The seven transplanted HIV-HCV coinfected patients had most commonly HCV-related hepatocarcinoma (n = 5, 71.42%). Three subjects (42.85%) developed HCV recurrences. Two patients (28.57%) were retransplanted, both due to HCV recurrence with one of them developing a spontaneous clearance of HCV (14.28%). This patient showed a preoperative HIV viral load < 50 copies IU/mL, CD4+ count 486/μL, HCV-RNA 2564 IU copies/mL, Anti-HBc+, and MELD 30. The donor was an 81-year-old female who was Anti-HBc+. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and prednisone. One month after transplantation, the patient developed an acute cellular rejection episode with progression of liver disease secondary to the HCV recurrence (56.5 × 105 copies IU/mL). He started antiviral treatment (α-interferon and ribavirin), but due to side effects and interactions with the antiretrovirals, they were stopped after four doses. The viral load decreased spontaneously and progressively until it became negative at 146 days after transplantation; he was retransplanted and HCV-RNA has continued to be negative after 772 days.

Conclusion

Spontaneous clearance of HCV among HIV-HCV coinfected liver transplant patients is possible. Despite no treatment, one patient still has no detectable HCV viral load after retransplantation.     

Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence Occurs Earlier in Patients Receiving Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplant Grafts Compared With Those Receiving Donation After Brainstem Death Grafts

Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis remains the commonest indication for liver transplantation worldwide, yet few studies have investigated the impact of donation after circulatory death (DCD) graft use on HCV recurrence and patient outcomes. DCD grafts have augmented the limited donor organ pool and reduced wait-list mortality, although concerns regarding graft longevity and patient outcome persist.