Anorectal manometry in children with chronic functional constipation

BACKGROUND: The anorectal manometry is a very utilized and well recognized examination in children with chronic functional constipation. The major manometric findings in these children are: anal hypotonia, anal hypertonia, paradoxal contraction of the external anal sphincter, decreased ability of internal anal sphincter to relax during rectal distension and alterations in rectal contractility, sensibility and compliance. AIMS: To evaluate the anal basal pressure and the relaxation reflex before and after standard treatment for a better understanding of the physiopathologic mechanisms involved in pediatric chronic functional constipation. METHODS: Anorectal manometry was performed before treatment on 20 children with chronic functional constipation aged 4 to 12 years and the results were compared to those obtained after standard treatment, with a good outcome. RESULTS: There was a reduction in anal basal pressure after treatment, but no differences were detected between the anorectal manometries performed before and after treatment in terms of amplitude and duration of relaxation, residual pressure, latency time, or descent and ascent angle. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the anal basal pressure decreased in children recovering from chronic functional constipation, but the standard treatment did not provide all the conditions necessary for the relaxation reflex of constipated children to return to the values described in normal children.     

Anorectal manometry in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis

Anorectal function was measured in 11 patients with active medically intractable ulcerative colitis, seven patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis, and 18 healthy subjects. The anal resting pressure, squeeze pressure, and ability to defecate a balloon were similar in all groups. Significantly lower rectal distention volumes were required for rectal sensation, critical volume, and to induce rectal contractility in patients with active disease compared to controls or patients with quiescent disease. Rectal compliance was significantly reduced in patients with active and quiescent disease. The increased rectal sensitivity and contractility in patients with active colitis appear to be related to active mucosal inflammation and ulceration. Episodes of mucosal inflammation may be responsible for chronic changes in the rectal wall resulting in fibrosis and decreased compliance in patients with quiescent disease. The frequency and urgency of defecation and the fecal incontinence may be due to a hypersensitive, hyperactive, and poorly compliant rectum.     

Anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome

This prospective study was undertaken to compare the utility of anorectal manometry (ARM) with that of anal electromyography (EMG) and cinedefecography (CD) in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS). One hundred sixteen consecutive patients with a history of chronic constipation were prospectively assessed. These 35 males and 81 females were of a mean age of 60 years, ranging from 18 to 84 years. The incidences of PPS were 63 percent for ARM, 38 percent for EMG, and 36 percent for CD. The correlations of PPS were suboptimal: ARM and EMG, 70 percent; and ARM and CD, 61 percent. A two-tiered system for the manometric classification of PPS was developed. First, the evacuation pressure curve pattern was classified as a normal relaxed downward (Type A; n=43), a nonrelaxed flat or equivocal (Type B; n=36), and a paradoxical upward (Type C; n=37). PPS was noted with increasing incidence within curve types (21 percent in Type A, 64 percent in Type B, and 95 percent in Type C). Second, an evacuation index (EI = evacuation pressure/squeeze pressure) was defined: Group I (El<0; n=43), Group II (0EI<0.25; n=24), Group III (0.25EI<0.5; n=27), and Group IV (EI0.5; n=18). The finding of PPS also correlated with the EI group: 21 percent in Group I, 67 percent in Group II, 74 percent in Group III, and 100 percent in Group IV. This subdivision of curve types and EI groups may provide a role in the diagnosis of PPS.Dr. Ger was a visiting colorectal surgeon from the Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical Centre and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.     

Anorectal manometry in patients with chronic constipation: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Constipation is a common complaint, but its clinical presentation varies with each individual. The aim of this study was to evaluate anorectal physiology in a prospective group of patients with chronic constipation. METHODOLOGY: A total of 24 consecutive patients with constipation underwent solid-state anorectal manometry. Fifteen healthy controls were also studied. The anorectal parameters included resting and squeeze sphincter pressure, sensory thresholds in response to balloon distension, compliance of rectum, and rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR). RESULTS: The rectal sensitivity for urge and pain did not differ between the groups, but the threshold volume for first sensation was higher in patients with constipation (p < 0.05). There was no group difference in the volume threshold for RAIR. However, the prevalence of impaired RAIR was higher in constipated patients. Anal pressure was lower in patients for maximal squeeze (p < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the anal sphincter length and resting pressure in patients (r = 0.51, p = 0.03) and healthy controls (r = 0.72, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Constipated patients are characterized by impaired rectal sensitivity and decreased anal sphincter contractile pressure. Anorectal manometry is helpful for diagnosing anorectal dysfunction in patients with chronic constipation.     

Anorectal manometry and defecography in the diagnosis of fecal incontinence.

We carried out anorectal manometry and defecography prospectively in 43 consecutive patients with fecal incontinence. A subgroup of 17 patients with severe incontinence was identified radiologically by a short and incompletely closed anal canal. In these patients, the anal resting pressure was significantly lower than in the rest of the group (34.9 +/- 11.4 mm Hg versus 60.0 +/- 25.7 mm Hg, respectively; p less than 0.01). The anorectal angle did not change in 24 patients during squeezing, indicating a dysfunction of the puborectalis muscle. Manometric data did not differ between this subgroup and patients with a more acute anorectal angle during voluntary sphincter contraction. This indicates that the anal pressures recorded manometrically do not reflect the function of a muscular component that is important in the maintenance of fecal continence. We conclude that anorectal manometry and defecography are complementary diagnostic tools in the investigation of patients with fecal incontinence.     

Anorectal manometry under anesthesia in the investigation of children with chronic constipation

Anorectal manometry under anesthesia was performed in 18 children, 15 of whom had long histories of constipation and had been on regular regimens of laxatives and enemas with no success. In these 15 patients, Hirschsprung's disease had not been demonstrated by barium enema. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with ketamine (intravenously or intramuscularly) in 16 patients, while halothane was used in the other two. It was found that anesthesia did not affect the events that are usually documented during anorectal manometry in the awake patient. In patients with a history of constipation, after mamometry, a rectal suction biopsy was taken, followed by a therapeutic anal stretch. Results of biopsies confirmed the manometric findings in all patients. Results of the present study demonstrate that ketamine may be used to anesthetize young patients suffering from chronic constipation for the purpose of performing anorectal manometry and taking a rectal suction biopsy (to exclude Hirschsprung's disease), followed by a therapeutic anal stretch. This work, the results of which are presented in this paper, was carried out at the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London, England.     

Anorectal manometry in irritable bowel syndrome: differences between diarrhoea and constipation predominant subjects.

Anorectal manometry with balloon distension was performed on 28 patients with diarrhoea predominant irritable bowel syndrome, 27 patients with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome and 30 normal controls. In the diarrhoea predominant group balloon volumes required to perceive the sensations of gas, stool, urgency of defecation and discomfort were significantly lower than in controls or constipation predominant patients (p less than 0.001). Diarrhoea predominant patients also had a significantly lower rectal compliance than controls or constipation predominant patients (p less than 0.03) but showed no difference in motor activity induced by distension. When the constipation predominant patients were compared with controls the only significant difference that emerged was in the volume at which discomfort was perceived. No significant differences between constipated subjects and controls were found in the distension induced motor activity. Symptom severity and psychological parameters were also recorded and the diarrhoea predominant patients were found to be more anxious than those with constipation (p = 0.04). It proved possible (by comparison with the control group) to identify three abnormal rectal subtypes in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. These were a sensitive rectum (low sensation thresholds, normal or low rectal pressure), a stiff rectum (normal or low sensation thresholds, high pressure) and an insensitive rectum (high sensation thresholds, normal or high pressure) and their distribution varied considerably depending on bowel habit. Some form of rectal abnormality was identified in 75% of diarrhoea predominant patients compared with 30% of constipation predominant subjects (p = 0.002). A sensitive rectum was a particular feature of diarrhoea predominant patients being observed in 57% of patients compared with only 7% of the constipated group (p less than 0.001).     

慢性功能性便秘肛直肠压力检测及EMG生物反馈训练疗效的研究

目的探讨慢性功能性便秘(CFC)患者肛直肠压力及肌电(EMG)活动特点,同时观察生物反馈训练系统对CFC患者的疗效及对上述指标的影响.方法用BIOLAB动力学参数监测系统(液态式),多道胃肠功能检查仪对144例CFC患者检测,并用OrionPC/12mEMG生物反馈治疗仪进行肌电评估和训练,20例健康者作对照.结果与健康对照组相比,CFC患者肛管静息压稍下降(P＞0.01)、最大缩榨压明显降低(P＜0.01),直肠感知阈和最大耐受量均显著增高(P＜0.01);EMG评估CFC患者盆底肌与腹前斜肌有矛盾运动100%,其运动幅值盆底肌静息状态下升高(P＜0.01)和腹前斜肌降低(P＜0.01);OrionPC/12mEMG生物反馈训练治疗后可显著改善CF C患者上述异常改变(P＜0.01),生物反馈治疗CFC患者临床症状改善,总有效率为84.03%,增加疗程的频次、缩短治疗间隔以及辅助家庭训练等可以提高疗效和降低复发率(P＜0.01).结论CFC患者存在肛门直肠动力、感知觉及肌电活动异常,OrionPC/12mEMG生物反馈系统可以改善上述异常表现,对84.03%的CFC患者具有良好的疗效,较长时间的强化训练可望提高近期疗效,辅助家庭训练可降低复发率.     

High-resolution manometry

Recently, high-resolution oesophageal manometry was added to the armamentarium of researchers and gastroenterologists. Current studies suggest that the yield of high-resolution oesophageal manometry is higher than that of conventional pull-through manometry and is at least comparable to that of sleeve sensor manometry. Probably the most important advantage of solid-state high-resolution manometry is that it makes oesophageal manometry faster and easier to perform. Topographic plotting of high-resolution manometry signals facilitates their interpretation. It is concluded that high-resolution manometry is a promising technique for the evaluation of oesophageal motor function. Further studies will have to determine whether high-resolution manometry is superior to conventional manometry in the diagnostic work-up of patients with oesophageal symptoms.     

Pleural manometry

The goals of therapeutic thoracentesis are to remove the maximum amount of pleural fluid to improve dyspnea and to facilitate the diagnostic evaluation of large pleural effusions. Pleural manometry may be useful for immediately detecting an unexpandable lung, which may coexist when any pleural fluid accumulates. Pleural manometry may improve patient safety when removing large amounts of pleural fluid. The basics of pleural space mechanics are discussed as they apply to the normal pleural space and to pleural effusion associated with expandable and unexpandable lung. This article also discusses the instrumentation required to perform bedside manometry, how manometry may decrease the risk of re-expansion pulmonary edema when large amounts of fluid are removed, and the diagnostic capabilities of manometry.     

Antroduodenal manometry

We performed fasting and postprandial recordings of antroduodenal manometry in 21 normal volunteers, 13 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and gastrointestinal symptoms, and 11 patients with the irritable bowel syndrome. None of the patients or volunteers had previously undergone an intestinal intubation study. Recordings could not be obtained from four of the diabetic patients due to failure to intubate the pylorus. Catheter migration led to incomplete antral data in a further 21% of all recordings. Due to the wide variations demonstrated by the normal volunteers, parameters of either the migrating motor complex (MMC) or the fed response could not differentiate between either of the patient groups and/or the controls. Similarly, while abnormal patterns of either fasting or postprandial motility were common in the diabetic patients, manometry had a sensitivity of only 67% in comparison to the less invasive radionuclide gastric emptying study. Furthermore, manometry failed to identify any diagnostic abnormality in irritable bowel patients; in particular, the incidence of clustered contractions was similar in all three groups. We conclude that short duration antroduodenal manometry is of limited diagnostic usefulness due to the difficulties in pyloric intubation in the presence of a dilated stomach and the intrinsic variability in normal motor patterns, perhaps excerbated by the stressful effects of the procedure itself in tube-naive subjects.Presented, in part, at the Midwest Student Medical Research Forum, Omaha, Nebraska February 1990 and at the American Gastroenterological Association, May 1991, and has appeared in abstract form Clin Res 1990; 38905A and Gastroenterology 1991; 100A484.     

Esophageal manometry

Esophageal manometric study has gained tremendous popularity over the past decade. However, the contribution of this diagnostic technology has not been critically evaluated. The purpose of this report is, therefore, to determine how frequently esophageal manometry alters the clinical diagnosis and treatment and to assess the cost of new information. The patients reviewed in this report consisted of 363 consecutive referrals. Each completed a questionnaire, had an esophagogram, and underwent an esophageal manometric study for the evaluation of dysphagia, heartburn, and/or chest pain of unexplained etiology. To determine the clinical contribution of manometry, diagnoses before and after the study were compared. On the basis of symptoms and radiologic data, specific clinical entities were diagnosed in 36 patients. Manometric study did not confirm the diagnosis of achalasia in four of the 27 patients referred with this diagnosis and resulted in 19 additional specific diagnoses. Manometry changed the course of treatment in 14 cases, eight additional patients with achalasia received treatment, and four false-positive patients were spared inappropriate treatment. Moreover, two patients with simultaneous esophageal motor disorder and chest pain were spared further investigation. It is concluded that esophageal manometry altered the clinical diagnosis in 6% and changed the course of treatment in 4% of the population studied. Esophageal manometry is beneficial in patients with chest pain, dysphagia, and those in whom diagnosis of achalasia is suspected, but is of little benefit in patients with chronic heartburn. Assuming the cost per study to be $250, the cost of the study was $3945 per alteration of diagnosis and $6482 per alteration of treatment.     

Anal manometry

Conclusions and future developments Anal manometry on its own has limited value in the diagnosis and assessment of anorectal disorders. Thus, it should be performed in combination with other tests of anorectal function including defaecography, neurophysiological techniques and endosonography to obtain a broader picture of the disorder. Patients with faecal incontinence should benefit from this approach since it may help to clarify the influence of various possible causative factors leading to the adoption of the most appropriate therapeutic approach.     

Anorectal melanoma

PURPOSE: Operative management of patients with anorectal melanoma is controversial. To formulate a rational approach to patients with this disease, we reviewed our experience from 1929 to 1993. METHODS: Records of all patients treated at our center with anorectal melanoma from 1929 to the present were reviewed. Survival analyses were graphically displayed using the Kaplan-Meier productlimit method, and distributions were compared using the log-rank test. Fisher's exact test was used to compare groups with small sample sizes. RESULTS: Survival for the entire group (n = 85) was poor, 17 percent at 5 years (median, 19 months). Among the 71 patients with resectable disease, the five-year, disease-free survival distribution of patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) was more favorable than that of patients who underwent local procedures only, although this was not statistically significant (27 percentvs.5 percent, APR vs. local procedures, respectively;P=0.11). However, those who had an APR were more likely to survive long term than those who did not (P<0.05). All ten long-term survivors were women. Nine had undergone APR, and one had a wide local excision. Of the nine survivors following APR, eight had negative and one had positive mesenteric nodes. Median size of the primary tumor in survivors following APR was 2.5 cm, compared with 4.0 cm for patients who did not survive long term following APR. CONCLUSIONS: APR should be considered in patients with localized anorectal melanoma, particularly those with smaller tumors and no evidence of nodal metastases. Supported by a Richard Molin Foundation Award to Dr. Mary S. Brady.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, May 8 to 13, 1994.