Rural Health Research: Do Advanced Practice Nurses and Physician Assistants Benefit Small Rural Hospitals?

Advanced practice nurses and physician assistants have offered small, rural hospitals an alternative to scarce primary care physicians for 30 years. This paper uses survey data from 285 small rural hospitals and case studies of 36 of these hospitals to answer questions about the extent to which advanced practice nurses and physician assistants provide primary care in small, rural hospitals, the benefits that might bring to the hospitals as well as the reactions of the public. The study used survey data collected as part of an evaluation of 285 hospitals, which received a Rural Health Care Transition grant from the Health Care Financing Administration in 1993 and 1994. Most of the hospitals used the practitioners; 70 percent used nurse practitioners; 30 percent used physician assistants; and 20 percent used both. There were some negative reactions to the use of the practitioners, but, overall, there was acceptance and benefits to the hospitals in the form of reduced recruitment costs, increased revenues and increased service offerings. These practitioners are beneficial to rural hospitals, and mechanisms to encourage their acceptance should be developed and implemented.     

A Comparison of Metropolitan and Rural Medical Schools in China: Which Schools Provide Rural Physicians?

ABSTRACT: To compare the role of metropolitan and rural medical schools in the provision of rural physicians, a survey was conducted in 12 metropolitan and 10 rural medical schools. Rural medical schools enrolled fewer students (P = 0.019), and produced fewer graduates (P = 0.023) than metropolitan medical schools. Students in rural medical schools were mainly from surrounding regional cities and counties, whereas those in metropolitan schools were from cities nationwide (P < 0.001). All rural medical schools produced rural physicians; one rural school reported that of its 256 graduates, 88 (34.4%) entered rural practice. Ten of the 12 metropolitan medical schools did not produce any rural physicians, whereas the remaining two metropolitan schools registered a total of 73 graduates who selected a rural practice location. These results indicate that rural medical schools may play a key role in overcoming the shortage of physicians in rural communities in China.     

Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, 1990–2005: Case Study of a Second-Generation Rural Medical Education Program

ABSTRACT

A pipeline model has been suggested to increase the rural physician supply. This study is an institutional case report used to describe the context, development, and in-house evaluation of the University of Alabama Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, 1990–2005. This program was developed at a University of Alabama School of Medicine branch campus to target rural students at multiple levels, elementary schools through residency, and includes a minority focus. Requirements to enter the medical program include living 8 years in rural Alabama, meeting admission requirements, and affinity for rural lifestyles. Twenty-six percent of 316 high school participants, all 40 students in the minority-focused college program, and 3% of 90 medical program students were African American. The program includes (1) puppet shows in elementary schools depicting different health professions, (2) Rural Health Scholars Program for 11th-grade students, (3) Minority Rural Health Pipeline Program for college students, (4) Rural Medical Scholars Program, a 5-year track of study in rural community health and medicine, and (5) assured admission to family medicine residency. Outcomes studied in this case report included medical school performance, graduation rate, selection of family medicine specialty, and rural practice location. Medical scholars were anticipated to experience academic difficulty, select family medicine specialty, and locate in rural practice more often than peers. Compared to peers, medical scholars showed lower scores on preclinical courses and USMLE steps 1 and 2, reflective of their lower MCAT and GPA scores, but had (1) similar graduation rates (95% vs peers 84%), (2) higher family medicine selection rate (47% vs Huntsville 27% vs Tuscaloosa 12% vs Birmingham 4% [OR compared to Birmingham 22.7, 95% CI 10.5–49.4]), and (3) higher rural practice rate (67% vs peers 14% vs national group 9%) in the first RMSP classes. Based on these important outcomes being better than or equal to the traditional student cohorts, the institution concluded that the Rural Health Leaders Pipeline demonstrates successful use of the rural pipeline model.     

Rural–Urban Differences in End-of-Life Care: Implications for Practice

Most older adults with advanced illnesses express the wish to die at home. Home-based care from home health and hospice agencies makes this possible, but there are great geographic variations in utilization. Interviews and focus groups with key constituents in home health and hospice agencies across the 8-county region of Western New York State were used to explore how rural–urban location and agency type (home health or hospice) influence variations in end-of-life care. Emergent themes were: Rural-Urban Differences (geographic challenges, market forces, and programming issues) and End-of-life Care Issues (macrosocial, mezzosocial, and microsocial factors). Implications for social work practice are discussed.     

Rural physicians' attitudes toward the elderly: evidence of ageism?

Rural elderly patients receive health services primarily in the outpatient setting, with their primary care provider often serving as their only point of contact with the health care system. Little is known however about the attitudes of physicians, and more specifically attitudes of those practicing in rural locations, toward differing age groups of the elderly. The current study was undertaken to examine the perceptions and attitudes of rural Florida physicians who routinely provide care for the elderly. We utilized an existing and validated survey instrument designed to measure the perceptions and attitudes of health professionals toward 3 different cohorts of elderly people: the elderly population in general, the elderly population older than 85 years, and the nursing home population. The study provides evidence that physicians who routinely provide care for the elderly in rural Florida demonstrate ageist perceptions, especially against those older than 85 years and the nursing home population. The trends identified are important because they may directly influence the quality of care that this population receives.     

Rural health care in New Zealand: Poised for renaissance?

ABSTRACT: Despite the idyllic potential, many parts of New Zealand's rural health services have continued to struggle for want of a workforce whose retention is not threatened by demanding rosters, heavy workloads and overwhelming bureaucracy. There may now be a basis for cautious optimism that a plan to integrate recommendations and trialled initiatives from the past decade may attract sufficient government funding to see a renaissance for rural primary health care. This paper outlines the elements contributing to what may be a last hope before crisis takes over.     

The Metabolic Syndrome: Are Rural Residents at Increased Risk?

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate the differences in prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its individual components across rural‐urban populations, as well as to determine the risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome and examine how they contribute toward rural‐urban disparity. Methods: Data came from the 1999‐2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, restricting to 6,896 participants aged 20 years or more with complete information. Metabolic syndrome was defined using the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Residence was measured at the census tract level using the Rural‐Urban Commuting Area Codes. We estimated the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components by residence. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine urban‐rural differences after adjusting for sociodemographic, health, dietary, and lifestyle factors. Results: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher in rural than urban residents (39.9% vs 32.8%), among both men (39.7% vs 33.3%) and women (40.2% vs 32.3%, respectively). The age and sex adjusted OR for metabolic syndrome in rural as compared to urban residents was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.02‐1.49), which was attenuated to 1.06 (95% CI, 0.90‐1.25) after adjusting for covariates. Older age, lower physical activity, higher screen time, higher meat intake, and skipping breakfast were associated with increased odds of metabolic syndrome. Conclusion: Rural dwelling was associated with higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults in the Unites States, which can be attributed to the differences in demographic composition and obesity‐related behavioral factors between urban and rural residents.     

Educating Generalist Physicians for Rural Practice: How Are We Doing?

Although about 20 percent of Americans live in rural areas, only 9 percent of physicians practice there. Physicians consistently and preferentially settle in metropolitan, suburban and other nonrural areas. The last 20 years have seen a variety of strategies by medical education programs and by federal and state governments to promote the choice of rural practice among physicians. This comprehensive literature review was based on MEDLINE and Health STAR searches, content review of more than 125 relevant articles and review of other materials provided by members of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Working Group on Rural Health. To the extent possible, a particular focus was directed to "small rural" communities of less than 10,000 people. Significant progress has been made in arresting the downward trend in the number of physicians in these communities but 22 million people still live in health professions shortage areas. This report summarizes the successes and failures of medical education and government programs and initiatives that are intended to prepare and place more generalist physicians in rural practice. It remains clear that the educational pipeline to rural medical practice is long and complex, with many places for attrition along the way. Much is now known about how to select, train and place physicians in rural practice, but effective strategies must be as multifaceted as the barriers themselves.     

Rural sports and recreational injuries in Australia: what do we know?

Objective: It is widely recognised that individuals residing in regional or rural areas have poorer health outcomes than those from metropolitan areas. Factors associated with these poorer health outcomes include geographical isolation, population declines, limited health care provision and higher levels of inactivity compared to urban areas. The mental, social and physical health of individuals and communities in rural areas can be improved through active participation in sport and recreation activities. Unfortunately, participation in such activities can potentially lead to injury. There is a suggestion that there is an increased risk of sports injuries in rural areas due to the lack of health professionals and coaching personnel, fewer available volunteers to organise and deliver sport, and the general attitude towards injuries in rural settings. Results: There is very limited information about the number and types of injuries sustained during participation in sports activities in rural and regional settings. This is largely related to a lack of formal sporting structures and support mechanisms including research funding and trained personnel. Conclusion: A range of factors need to be implemented to improve safety for sporting and recreational participants in these areas. These include improved monitoring of injury occurrence, stronger promotion of safety initiatives and wider implementation of education strategies. What is already known: It has been speculated that there is an increased risk of injury during sport in rural areas, compared to metropolitan centres. However, there is very little information about the actual levels of sports injury risk in rural communities. What this study adds: This review of formal and informal sources has identified significant gaps in our knowledge about sports injuries in rural Australia. It is likely that this lack of information, and the injury risk, is related to a lack of formal sporting structures and support mechanisms in these areas.     

Rural and remote health research: Does the investment match the need?

Objective

To determine the percentage of research projects funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council in the period 2000–2014 that aimed specifically to deliver health benefits to Australians living in rural and remote areas and to estimate the proportion of total funding this represented in 2005–2014.

Design

This is a retrospective analysis of publicly available datasets.

Setting

National Health and Medical Research Council Rural and Remote Health Research 2000–2014.

Outcome measures

‘Australian Rural Health Research’ was defined as: research that focussed on rural or remote Australia; that related to the National Health and Medical Research Council's research categories other than Basic Science; and aimed specifically to improve the health of Australians living in rural and remote areas. Grants meeting the inclusion criteria were grouped according to the National Health and Medical Research Council's categories and potential benefit. Funding totals were aggregated and compared to the total funding and Indigenous funding for the period 2005–2014.

Results

Of the 16 651 National Health and Medical Research Council‐funded projects, 185 (1.1%) that commenced funding during the period 2000–2014 were defined as ‘Australian Rural Health Research’. The funding for Australian Rural Health Research increased from 1.0% of the total in 2005 to 2.4% in 2014. A summary of the funding according to the National Health and Medical Research Council's research categories and potential benefit is presented.

Conclusion

Addressing the health inequality experienced by rural and remote Australians is a stated aim of the Australian Government. While National Health and Medical Research Council funding for rural health research has increased over the past decade, at 2.4% by value, it appears very low given the extent of the health status and health service deficits faced by the 30% who live in rural Australia.     

IRS: where's the charity? Rural hospital manager may lose federal tax exemption

A rural hospital management company with ties to VHA may lose its federal tax exemption because, according to the Internal Revenue Service, there's nothing charitable about operating a hospital under contract. The case against the company is significant because it calls into question the tax exemptions of any not-for-profit corporation that manages or leases hospitals.