Richards钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折体会

本院自１９９６年７月至２０００年１０月，共收治股骨粗隆间骨折病人４２例，其中１７例实行Richands钉手术治疗，效果满意。现报告如下。临床资料１．一般资料：本组１７例中，男１０例，女７例；年龄３２～７６岁，平均年龄５３．５岁。致伤原因：骑车跌伤２例，行走中不慎跌倒８例，被车撞跌４例，高处坠落伤３例。按Evan＇s分型方法，Ⅰ型１例，Ⅱ型３例，Ⅲ型９例，Ⅳ型４例。受伤到手术时间为２小时～６天。住院时间１０～２１天，平均１４．２天。入院时已有并发症１例，重要器官功能不全１例。２．治疗方法：入院后即行患肢股骨髁…     

Richard钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折54例

1　临床资料1.1　一般资料　本组男 47例 ,女 7例。年龄 2 5～ 86岁 ,其中5 0～ 86岁 3 4例 (占 63 % ) ,平均年龄 5 4岁。左侧 2 6例 ,右侧2 8例。损伤原因 :跌伤 2 8例 ,坠落伤 2 0例 ,车祸伤 6例。按Ｔｒｏｎｚｏ和Ｅｖａｎｓ分类法 ,Ⅰ型 3例 ,Ⅱ型 12例 ,Ⅲ型 2 3例 ,Ⅳ型 10例 ,Ⅴ型 6例。术前并存心血管病 11例 ,脑血管病 3例 ,糖尿病 4例。外伤至手术时间 2～ 12ｄ ,平均 4ｄ。1.2　手术方法　一般患者术前皮牵引 ,对有内科并存症患者估计术前准备时间较长者行胫骨结节牵引 ,请内科、麻醉科会诊协助治疗 ,全面评价病情 ,估计能耐受…     

Gamma钉内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的体会

目的探讨高龄股骨粗隆间骨折,Gamma钉内固定治疗的临床效果。方法总结分析我院2005年至2008年使用Gamma钉内固定治疗65岁以上高龄股骨粗隆间骨折31例病例资料。结果除1例术后第4天死亡外,其他30例均获得4—32个月随访,平均18个月,骨折愈合29例,占93．8％（29／31）,内固定失败髋内翻1例,占3．2％。结论Gamma钉内固定是治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的有效方法。     

Gamma钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折12例报告

我科自 2 0 0 0年 8月至 2 0 0 1年 1月应用 Gam ma钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折及粗隆部多发性骨折共 12例 ,效果十分满意 ,报告如下。临床资料一、一般资料　男性 9例 ,女性 3例 ,年龄在 46～ 92岁。平均 72岁 ,直接暴力 4例 ,间接暴力 8例。骨折按 Evan′s分类 , 型 8例 , 型 2例 , a型 1例 , b型 1例。随访时间最长 8个月 ,最短 2个月 ,平均 4.5个月 ,平均住院天数 2 3.6 d。术后下地负重平均为术后 12 .5 d。术后 X线复查 ,均已证实骨折愈合或多量骨痂形成。二、手术方法　手术采用气管插管全麻或连续硬膜外麻醉 ,患者仰卧在骨科手术床上 ,…     

股骨近端髓内钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折

目的探讨股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效及其相关问题。方法回顾性分析采用股骨近端髓内钉治疗的21例股骨粗隆间骨折患者的术后骨折愈合及并发症情况。结果所有病例均得到随访，随访时间平均为10个月，骨折全部愈合，功能恢复按黄公怡标准，优7例，良11例，可3例，优良率85．7％。结论PFN具有内固定牢固、应力分散、防旋转功能强、手术操作简单等优点，是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的理想方法之一。     

股骨粗隆间骨折内固定的体会

股骨粗隆间骨折内固定的体会吴景华，吴岳嵩，霍华春，唐道峰股骨粗隆间骨折，是中老年人常见的骨伤之一，由于中老年人大粗隆部位骨质疏松，常因外伤或跌倒时大粗隆部着地发生骨折。自１９９１年以来，我们根据不同类型的骨折，选用不同的固定器材，其愈后随访结果加以比...     

股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折

目的探讨应用股骨近端防旋髓内钉（proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNa）治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法 2008年5月至2010年9月,应用PFNA治疗25例老年股骨粗隆间骨折,其中男10例,女15例;年龄70～102岁,平均78岁：左侧11例,右侧14例。根据Evans分型,Ⅰ型3例,Ⅱ型5例,Ⅲ型9例,Ⅳ型6例,V型2例;均为闭合性骨折。手术均采用C型臂引导下对骨折端进行闭合复位,PFNA内固定。术后观察骨折愈合与功能恢复情况。结果所有病例均获得随访,随访时间9～22个月,平均14个月。骨折均全部骨性愈合,愈合时间3～4个月,平均3.5个月。无一例发生髋内翻畸形、螺旋刀片切割股骨头及断钉现象。按Harris髋关节功能评分标准,优14例,良8例,可3例,优良率为92%。结论 PFNA能治疗除股骨髓腔畸形、闭塞外的绝大多数股骨粗隆间骨折,PFNA操作简单,微创、失血少、内固定可靠,对合并有严重骨质疏松的患者,更具优势。     

运用Gamma钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间及粗隆下骨折

目的 探讨Gamma钉治疗股骨粗隆间及粗隆下骨折的临床疗效.方法 对87例股骨粗隆间及粗隆下骨折行Gamma钉内固定治疗,并观察其术后疗效.结果 本组随访1～2.5年.复查X线片显示骨折均牢固愈合,无骨不连、内固定松动、脱出或再骨折,无拉力螺钉切出股骨头及主钉远端股骨干骨折.结论 Gamma钉经准确复位和坚强内固定,可...     

实验性股骨粗隆间骨折Gamma钉内固定的生物力学比较

股骨粗隆间骨折治疗方法有很多种,但无论非手术治疗还是手术治疗都存在着卧床时间长,并发症多等问题。八十年代末期,国外开始使用Gamma钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折,经不断改进,应用日益广泛。临床和生物力学研究表明,Gamma钉是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折较为理想的方法。我所自1993年来在国外原钉基础上对该钉大小,形状以及瞄准装置加以改进,形成了改良型Gamma钉,并成功应用于临床。本研究旨在对改良型Gamma钉(GN)和以前应用较多的国产麦氏鹅头钉(MNP),经矩4枚斯氏针(MSP)进行生物力学比较分析。1 材料与方法1.1 实验标本 防腐尸体股骨4对,取自福尔马林固定的解剖尸体,用来作Gamma钉和经矩4枚斯氏针的生物力学比较分析。     

Unstable Ankle Fracture Fixation Using Locked Fibular Intramedullary Nail in High-Risk Patients

Open reduction internal fixation is the gold standard for unstable ankle fracture fixation; however, complications in patients with multiple medical comorbidities are common. Intramedullary nail fixation of the fibula can help to mitigate these difficulties. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent fixation for unstable ankle fracture between January 2015 and March 2016 at our level I trauma center. Comorbidities in the patient sample included were one or several of diabetes, renal disease, hypertension, advanced age with osteoporosis, hemorrhagic blisters, and alcoholism. The primary outcomes studied were wound complications, infections, and hardware failure or failure of fixation. Eighteen patients with a mean age of 61 years underwent fibular intramedullary nail fixation, all of whom were considered at high risk for postoperative complications. Patients presented with Weber B or C fracture patterns. All patients had syndesmotic fixation through the nail by one or two 3.5-mm tricortical screws. A medial malleolus was added if needed for stability. The average follow-up time was 291.1 (range 9 to 14 months) days. The prescribed range of time to weightbearing was 2 to 6 weeks. All patients maintained reduction of the fracture and had no wound complications. No syndesmotic screws broke postoperatively, although most patients to failed comply with the postoperative non-weightbearing restrictions. Intramedullary nailing of the fibula with syndesmotic intranail fixation is minimally invasive, quick, and provides adequate fixation strength. It offers a viable treatment option for patients at high risk for complications or who are suspected to have difficulty with follow-up or compliance.     

股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折

目的探讨应用股骨近端抗旋髓内钉（proximal femoral nail anti-rotation，PFNA）治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法应用PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折22例。结果经3～12个月随访，平均9个月．骨折全部获得愈合。根据Harris髋关节评分，优14例，良7例，差1例．优良率95．5％。结论PFNA治疗股骨粗降间骨折具有创伤小、固定牢靠、防旋转、防切割等优点，是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折理想的内固定物，值得推广。     

改良Gamma髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折

目的探讨使用改良Gamma髓内钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效、手术要点和注意事项。方法对2002年6月～2004年5月使用改良Gamma髓内钉固定治疗87例股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效进行回顾性分析。手术采用闭合穿钉,小切口复位。结果本组中81例随访6～18个月,优76例,良5例,优良率100％。股骨粗隆间骨折平均愈合时间约11周,骨折愈合率达到100％,无髋内翻等严重并发症。结论改良Gamma髓内钉是目前治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的一种有效的新方法。     

小切口复位逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折

目的探讨小切口复位逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折的临床效果。方法2003年7月至2006年12月，对24例股骨远端骨折患者的手术治疗进行回顾性分析。按股骨远端骨折AO／ASIF分型，A型16例～型8例，治疗采用小切口复位逆行交锁髓内钉内固定。结果本组病例随访时间6～24个月（平均17．4个月），平均愈合时间为4．6个月，无术后感染，1例远端锁钉断裂，经制动后愈合。按Neer等膝关节评分标准进行评价，优15例，良6例，优良率87．5％。结论小切口复位逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折，手术操作简单，固定可靠，对软组织破坏少，骨折愈合率明显提高，用于治疗股骨远端复杂骨折手术效果好。     

Richard钉和加压螺纹钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折

目的　总结分析老年股骨转子间骨折采用Richard钉和加压螺纹钉冶疗的疗效。方法　对老年股骨转子间骨折病人 4 6例 ,男 2 1例 ,女 2 5例 ,年龄 6 0～ 92岁。按照Evans分型 :Ⅰ型 12例、Ⅱ型 18例、Ⅲ型 10例、Ⅳ型 6例。分别观察行Richard钉和加压螺纹钉内固定术后肢体功能恢复情况。结果　术前住院 3～ 10d。随访 6～ 18个月 ,全部达骨折愈合。无住院期间死亡病例 ,骨折内固定良好 ,未见髋关节畸形和内固定失效。髋关节功能恢复满意。结论　只要术前准备充分 ,采取有效措施治疗内科并存症 ,老年股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗能够取得满意疗效。     

PFNA治疗老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折

目的总结PFNA治疗老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折的临床效果。方法采用PFNA治疗老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折17例。结果所有患者均获随访,平均24(6～54)周,骨折均愈合,愈合平均时间14(8～22)周。未见患肢短缩内翻、旋转畸形或内固定螺旋刀片切割,无感染等并发症。髋关节功能按Sanders评分标准[1]评价:优15例,良2例。结论PFNA治疗老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折具有操作简单、创伤小、稳定性好、并发症少等优点。     

Comparison of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with Plate and Titanium Elastic Intramedullary Nail in Treating Pediatric Humeral Fracture

ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic efficacy of titanium elastic intramedullary nail (TEN) and open reduction and internal fixation with plate (ORIF) in the treatment of humeral fracture in children.MethodsA retrospective study was carried out in a total of 69 patients who were admitted to the hospital from January 2013 to December 2018. These patients, including 41 males and 28 females, were aged from 6 to 12 years old with a median of 8 years. These patients were diagnosed with humeral fracture and underwent the surgery of ORIF (n = 22) or TEN (n = 47). The intraoperative bleeding, operation time, length of stay (LOS), and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups. The therapeutic effect was assessed by the shoulder range of motion, the elbow range of motion, the UCLA shoulder function score, and the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) 6 months after the surgery.ResultsThe intraoperative bleeding (97.20 ± 27.83 mL vs 185.60 ± 37.50 mL, P < 0.05), the operation time (53.70 ± 11.87 min vs 73.50 ± 13.33 min, P < 0.05), and the fracture healing time (9.30 ± 4.23 weeks vs 13.45 ± 3.67 weeks, P < 0.05) in the TEN group was significantly decreased than those in the ORIF group. There was no significant difference in the LOS between the two groups. The length of follow‐up is 3 and 6 months. The shoulder range of motion (110.88° ± 15.82° vs 98.37° ± 16.22° at 3 months and 162.88° ± 17.29° vs 117.65° ± 19.38° at 6 months, both P < 0.05), the elbow range of motion (105.23° ± 2.81° vs 87.12° ± 4.73° at 3 months and 137.47° ± 4.82° vs 109.67° ± 5.83° at 6 months, both P < 0.05), and the UCLA shoulder function score (28.58 ± 4.74 vs 21.64 ± 7.23 at 3 months and 33.05 ± 3.27 vs 25.78 ± 3.87 at 6 months, both P < 0.05), and the MEPS (80.76 ± 3.53 vs 65.33 ± 9.43 at 3 months and 97.48 ± 1.23 vs 88.22 ± 3.65 at 6 months, both P < 0.05) in the TEN group were greater than those in the ORIF group. In the TEN group, complications occurred in three of 47 cases (6.38%), including one case (2.13%) of bone nonunion and two cases (4.25%) of irritation response around the nail. In the ORIF group, complications occurred in four of 22 cases (18.18%), including one case (4.55%) of delayed healing, one case (4.55%) of deep infection, and two cases (9.08%) of radial nerve injury. The complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionTEN can be a good technique for the treatment of humeral fracture in children, with the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding, shorter operative time, quicker healing, and better recovery of shoulder range of motion and elbow range of motion.     

GAMMA钉在粗隆间骨折的临床应用

自1993年开始到现在,作者用Gamma钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折28例.在本组28例中有20例随访在3个月以上,均见骨痂生长或骨愈合,无患肢短缩、内外旋转和骨不连表现.作者认为治疗成功的关键是骨折的解剖复位、断端的加压及远端的自锁钉固定.如果达此目的,即能收到坚强而稳定内固定效果,术后能早期进行功能练习.作者认为Gamma钉内固定技术对老年人股骨粗隆间骨折是一种行之有效的方法.与其他方法比较,此内固定物更接近人体生物力学,而且手术后能早期离床康复练习,减少床上并发症.但是对有严重骨质疏松的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者,需要慎重考虑应用此内固定技术.     

解剖型锁定钢板治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折

目的总结解剖型锁定钢板治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的方法及疗效。方法22例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者,均采用切开复位解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗。结果22例平均随访13(7~24)个月,骨折全部愈合,无螺钉退出及切割股骨头,无明显髋内翻畸形。疗效评价:优16例,良6例,优良率100%。结论解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折,创伤小,固定可靠,符合生物力学要求,并发症少,能早期活动和负重,进而改善髋关节功能,临床效果良好。