The efficacy of epinephrine or vasopressin for resuscitation during epidural anesthesia

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during epidural anesthesia is considered difficult because of diminished coronary perfusion pressure. The efficacy of epinephrine and vasopressin in this setting is unknown. Therefore, we designed this study to assess the effects of epinephrine versus vasopressin on coronary perfusion pressure in a porcine model with and without epidural anesthesia and subsequent cardiac arrest. Thirty minutes before induction of cardiac arrest, 16 pigs received epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine while another 12 pigs received only saline administration epidurally. After 1 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, followed by 3 min of basic life-support CPR, Epidural Animals and Control Animals randomly received every 5 min either epinephrine (45, 45, and 200 microg/kg) or vasopressin (0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 U/kg). During basic life-support CPR, mean +/- SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly lower after epidural bupivacaine than after epidural saline (13 +/- 1 vs 24 +/- 2 mm Hg, P < 0.05). Ninety seconds after the first drug administration, epinephrine increased coronary perfusion pressure significantly less than vasopressin in control animals without epidural block (42 +/- 2 vs 57 +/- 5 mm Hg, P < 0.05), but comparably to vasopressin after epidural block (45 +/- 4 vs 48 +/- 6 mm Hg). Defibrillation was attempted after 18 min of CPR. After return of spontaneous circulation, bradycardia required treatment in animals receiving vasopressin, especially with epidural anesthesia. Systemic acidosis was increased in animals receiving epinephrine than vasopressin, regardless of presence or absence of epidural anesthesia. We conclude that vasopressin may be a more desirable vasopressor for resuscitation during epidural block because the response to a single dose is longer lasting, and acidosis after multiple doses is less severe compared with epinephrine.     

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during severe hypothermia in pigs: does epinephrine or vasopressin increase coronary perfusion pressure?

The American Heart Association does not recommend epinephrine for management of hypothermic cardiac arrest if body core temperature is below 30 degrees C. Furthermore, the effects of vasopressin administration during hypothermic cardiac arrest are totally unknown. This study was designed to assess the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine on coronary perfusion pressure in a porcine model during hypothermic cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pigs were surface-cooled until their body core temperature was 26 degrees C. After 30 min of untreated cardiac arrest, followed by 3 min of basic life support CPR, 15 animals were randomly assigned to receive, at 5-min intervals, either vasopressin (0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 U/kg; n = 5), epinephrine (45, 45, and 200 microg/kg; n = 5), or saline placebo (n = 5). Compared with epinephrine, mean +/- SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher (P < 0.05) 90 s and 5 min after the first (35+/-4 vs 22+/-3 mm Hg and 37+/-2 vs 16+/-2 mm Hg) and the second vasopressin administration (40+/-5 vs 26+/-5 mm Hg and 36+/-5 vs 18+/-2 mm Hg, respectively). After the third drug administration, coronary perfusion pressure in the epinephrine group increased dramatically and was comparable to vasopressin. In the saline placebo group, coronary perfusion pressure was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in the vasopressin and epinephrine groups. Six animals treated with epinephrine or vasopressin had transient return of spontaneous circulation, whereas all placebo animals died (P < 0.05). During CPR in severe hypothermia, administration of both vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in significant increases in coronary perfusion pressure when compared with placebo. IMPLICATIONS: Our study was designed to assess the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine in a porcine model simulating cardiac arrest during severe hypothermia. This study demonstrates that the administration of both emergency drugs results in an increased perfusion pressure in the heart.     

A comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in a porcine model of cardiac arrest after rapid intravenous injection of bupivacaine

In a porcine model, we compared the efficacy of epinephrine, vasopressin, or the combination of epinephrine and vasopressin with that of saline placebo on the survival rate after bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest. After the administration of 5 mg/kg of a 0.5% bupivacaine solution i.v., ventilation was interrupted for 3 +/- 1 min (mean +/- SD) until asystole occurred. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated after 1 min of cardiac arrest. After 2 min of CPR, 28 animals received, every 5 min, epinephrine; vasopressin; epinephrine combined with vasopressin; or placebo i.v.. Three minutes after each drug administration, up to 3 countershocks (3, 4, and 6 J/kg) were administered; all subsequent shocks were 6 J/kg. Blood was drawn throughout the experiment for the determination of plasma bupivacaine concentration. In the vasopressin/epinephrine combination group, all pigs survived (P < 0.01 versus placebo); in the vasopressin group 5 of 7, in the epinephrine group 4 of 7, and in the placebo group none of 7 swine survived. The plasma concentration of total bupivacaine showed no significant difference among groups. In this model of bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest, CPR with a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in significantly better survival rates than in the placebo group. IMPLICATIONS: Although cardiovascular collapse occurs mostly immediately after rapid injection of a local anesthetic in the presence of anesthesiologists, resuscitation may be difficult, and the outcome is usually poor. In this model of bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in significantly better survival rates than in the placebo group.     

Treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after liver trauma: fatal effects of fluid resuscitation versus improved outcome after vasopressin

In a porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, we evaluated the effects of vasopressin versus an equal volume of saline placebo versus fluid resuscitation on hemodynamic variables and short-term survival. Twenty-one anesthetized pigs were subjected to severe liver injury. When mean arterial blood pressure was <20 mm Hg and heart rate decreased, pigs randomly received either vasopressin IV (0.4 U/kg; n = 7), an equal volume of saline placebo (n = 7), or fluid resuscitation (1000 mL each of lactated Ringer's solution and hetastarch; n = 7). Thirty minutes after intervention, surviving pigs were fluid resuscitated while bleeding was surgically controlled. Mean (+/- SEM) arterial blood pressure 5 min after the intervention was significantly (P < 0.05) higher after vasopressin than with saline placebo or fluid resuscitation (58 +/- 9 versus 7 +/- 3 versus 32 +/- 6 mm Hg, respectively). Vasopressin improved abdominal organ blood flow but did not cause further blood loss (vasopressin versus saline placebo versus fluid resuscitation 10 min after intervention, 1343 +/- 60 versus 1350 +/- 22 versus 2536 +/- 93 mL, respectively; P < 0.01). Seven of 7 vasopressin pigs survived until bleeding was controlled and 60 min thereafter, whereas 7 of 7 saline placebo and 7 of 7 fluid resuscitation pigs died (P < 0.01). We conclude that vasopressin, but not saline placebo or fluid resuscitation, significantly improves short-term survival during uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. IMPLICATIONS: Although IV fluid administration is the mainstay of nonsurgical management of trauma patients with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, the efficacy of this strategy has been discussed controversially. In this animal model of severe liver trauma with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, vasopressin, but not saline placebo or fluid resuscitation, improved short-term survival.     

The effects of repeated doses of vasopressin or epinephrine on ventricular fibrillation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation

This study evaluated ventricular fibrillation mean frequency and amplitude to predict defibrillation success in a porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) model using repeated administration of vasopressin or epinephrine. After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 3 min of CPR, 10 pigs were randomly assigned to receive either vasopressin (early vasopressin: 0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 units/kg, respectively, n = 5) or epinephrine (early epinephrine: 45, 45, and 200 microg/kg, respectively, n = 5). Another 11 animals were randomly allocated after 4 min of cardiac arrest and 8 min of CPR to receive every 5 min either vasopressin (late vasopressin: 0.4 and 0. 8 units/kg, respectively, n = 5) or epinephrine (late epinephrine: 45 and 200 microg/kg, n = 6). Ventricular fibrillation mean frequency and amplitude on defibrillation were significantly higher in the vasopressin groups than in the epinephrine groups, respectively. In vasopressin versus epinephrine animals, mean frequency immediately before defibrillation was 9.6 +/- 1.5 Hz vs 7. 0 +/- 0.7 Hz (P < 0.001), mean amplitude was 0.65 +/- 0.26 mV vs 0. 21 +/- 0.14 mV (P < 0.001, and coronary perfusion pressure was 27 +/- 9 mm Hg vs 8 +/- 4 mm Hg (P < 0.00001), respectively. In contrast to no epinephrine animals, all vasopressin animals were successfully defibrillated and survived 1 h (P < 0.05). Mean fibrillation frequency and amplitude predicted successful defibrillation and may serve as noninvasive markers to monitor continuing CPR efforts. Furthermore, vasopressin was superior to epinephrine in maintaining these variables above a threshold necessary for successful defibrillation.     

The effects of endogenous and exogenous vasopressin during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Exogenous vasopressin is a promising vasopressor when blood pressure is critically threatened, but the role of endogenous vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is unknown. We assessed the role of endogenous versus exogenous vasopressin in a porcine open chest CPR model. Seven minutes before induction of cardiac arrest, seven pigs received 10 microg/kg of a selective vasopressin V(1)-receptor-antagonist (Blocked Vasopressin group); another 12 pigs in two groups received saline administration only. After 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation followed by 3 min of basic life support CPR, six animals received 0.8 U/kg vasopressin (Exogenous Vasopressin group), whereas the blocked vasopressin group (n = 7), and the remaining six animals received saline placebo only (Endogenous Vasopressin group). Defibrillation was attempted after 14 min of CPR. During basic life support CPR, left ventricular myocardial blood flow was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in the Blocked Vasopressin group compared with the Exogenous Vasopressin group and Endogenous Vasopressin group (42 +/- 5 compared with 64 +/- 6 and 66 +/- 6 mL x min(-1) x 100g(-1)). Left ventricular myocardial blood flow was significantly decreased in the Blocked Vasopressin group versus Exogenous Vasopressin group versus Endogenous Vasopressin group 90 s and 5 min after drug administration, respectively (38 +/- 4 and 27 +/- 3 vs 145 +/- 32 and 110 +/- 12 vs 62 +/- 4 and 56 +/- 6 mL x min(-1) x 100g(-1), respectively). None of seven Blocked Vasopressin animals, six of six Exogenous Vasopressin pigs, and six of six Endogenous Vasopressin swine had return of spontaneous circulation after 14 min of cardiac arrest including 10 min of CPR (P < 0.05). In conclusion, pigs with blocked endogenous vasopressin had poor coronary perfusion pressure and left ventricular myocardial blood flow during open chest CPR, and could not be successfully resuscitated. All pigs with effective endogenous vasopressin or pigs with effective endogenous vasopressin and additional exogenous vasopressin had good left ventricular myocardial blood flow during experimental CPR, and survived the 1-h postresuscitation phase. We conclude that endogenous vasopressin is an adjunct vasopressor to epinephrine and may serve as a back-up regulator to maintain cardiocirculatory homeostasis.     

Endobronchial Vasopressin Improves Survival during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pigs

Background: Intravenous administration of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be more effective than optimal doses of epinephrine. This study evaluated the effect of endobronchial vasopressin during CPR.

Methods: After 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation and 3 min of CPR, 21 pigs were randomized to be treated with 0.8 U/kg intravenous vasopressin (n = 7), 0.8 U/kg endobronchial vasopressin (n = 9), or an endobronchial placebo of normal saline (n = 5). Defibrillation was performed 5 min after drug administration to attempt return of spontaneous circulation.

Results: All animals in the intravenous and endobronchial vasopressin group were resuscitated successfully, but only two of five animals in the placebo group were. At 2 and 5 min after drug administration, coronary perfusion pressure in the intravenous and endobronchial vasopressin group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (50 +/- 10, 34 +/- 5 vs. 16 +/- 6 mmHg, respectively; and 35 +/- 10, 39 +/- 10 vs. 19 +/- 5 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05).     

Vasopressor response in a porcine model of hypothermic cardiac arrest is improved with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the inspiratory impedance threshold valve

During normothermic cardiac arrest, a combination of active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the inspiratory threshold valve (ITV) significantly improves vital organ blood flow, but this technique has not been studied during hypothermic cardiac arrest. Accordingly, we evaluated the hemodynamic effects of ACD + ITV CPR before, and after, the administration of vasopressin in a porcine model of hypothermic cardiac arrest. Pigs were surface-cooled until their body core temperature was 26 degrees C. After 10 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, 14 animals were randomly assigned to either ACD CPR with the ITV (n = 7) or to standard (STD) CPR (n = 7). After 8 min of CPR, all animals received 0.4 U/kg vasopressin IV, and CPR was maintained for an additional 10 min in each group; defibrillation was attempted after 28 min of cardiac arrest, including 18 min of CPR. Before the administration of vasopressin, mean +/- SEM common carotid blood flow was significantly higher in the ACD + ITV group compared with STD CPR (67 +/- 13 versus 26 +/- 5 mL/min, respectively; P < 0.025). After vasopressin was given at minute 8 during CPR, mean +/- SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher in the ACD + ITV group, but did not increase in the STD group (29 +/- 3 versus 15 +/- 2 mm Hg, and 25 +/- 1 versus 14 +/- 1 mm Hg at minute 12 and 18, respectively; P < 0.001); mean +/- SEM common carotid blood flow remained higher at respective time points (33 +/- 8 versus 10 +/- 3 mL/min, and 31 +/- 7 versus 7 +/- 3 mL/min, respectively; P < 0.01). Without active rewarming, spontaneous circulation was restored and maintained for 1 h in three of seven animals in the ACD + ITV group versus none of seven animals in the STD CPR group (not significant). During hypothermic cardiac arrest, ACD CPR with the ITV improved common carotid blood flow compared with STD CPR alone. Moreover, after the administration of vasopressin, coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher during ACD + ITV CPR, but not during STD CPR. IMPLICATIONS: New strategies are needed to improve the efficiency of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in hypothermic cardiac arrest. Active compression-decompression CPR with the inspiratory threshold valve improved carotid blood flow (and coronary perfusion pressure with vasopressin) compared with standard CPR.     

Vasopressin,but not fluid resuscitation,enhances survival in a liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs

BACKGROUND: The authors compared the effects of vasopressin fluid resuscitation on survival in a liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs. METHODS: A midline laparotomy was performed on 23 domestic pigs, followed by an incision, and subsequent finger fraction across the right medial liver lobe. During hemorrhagic shock, animals were randomly assigned to receive either 0.4 U/kg vasopressin (n = 9), or fluid resuscitation (n = 7), or saline placebo (n = 7), respectively. A continuous infusion of 0.08 U x kg(-1) x min(-1) vasopressin in the vasopressin group, or normal saline was subsequently administered in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo group, respectively. After 30 min of experimental therapy, bleeding was controlled by surgical intervention, and blood transfusion and rapid fluid infusion were subsequently performed. RESULTS: Maximum mean arterial blood pressure during experimental therapy in the vasopressin-treated animals was significantly higher than in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo groups (mean +/- SD, 72 +/- 26 vs 38 +/- 16 vs 11 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively; P< 0.05). Subsequently, mean arterial blood pressure remained at approximately 40 mmHg in all vasopressin-treated animals, whereas mean arterial blood pressure in all fluid resuscitation and saline placebo pigs was close to aortic hydrostatic pressure (approximately 15 mmHg) within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy initiation. Total blood loss was significantly higher in the fluid resuscitation pigs compared with vasopressin or saline placebo after 10 min of experimental therapy (65 +/- 6 vs 42 +/- 4 vs 43 +/- 6 ml/kg, respectively; P< 0.05). Seven of seven fluid resuscitation, and seven of seven saline placebo pigs died within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy, while 8 of 9 vasopressin animals survived more than 7 days (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin, but not fluid resuscitation or saline placebo, ensured survival with full recovery in this liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs.     

Vasopressin, but Not Fluid Resuscitation, Enhances Survival in a Liver Trauma Model with Uncontrolled and Otherwise Lethal Hemorrhagic Shock in Pigs

Background: The authors compared the effects of vasopressin versus fluid resuscitation on survival in a liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs.

Methods: A midline laparotomy was performed on 23 domestic pigs, followed by an incision, and subsequent finger fraction across the right medial liver lobe. During hemorrhagic shock, animals were randomly assigned to receive either 0.4 U/kg vasopressin (n = 9), or fluid resuscitation (n = 7), or saline placebo (n = 7), respectively. A continuous infusion of 0.08 U [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 vasopressin in the vasopressin group, or normal saline was subsequently administered in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo group, respectively. After 30 min of experimental therapy, bleeding was controlled by surgical intervention, and blood transfusion and rapid fluid infusion were subsequently performed.

Results: Maximum mean arterial blood pressure during experimental therapy in the vasopressin-treated animals was significantly higher than in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo groups (mean +/- SD, 72 +/- 26 vs. 38 +/- 16 vs. 11 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively;P < 0.05). Subsequently, mean arterial blood pressure remained at approximately 40 mmHg in all vasopressin-treated animals, whereas mean arterial blood pressure in all fluid resuscitation and saline placebo pigs was close to aortic hydrostatic pressure (~15 mmHg) within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy initiation. Total blood loss was significantly higher in the fluid resuscitation pigs compared with vasopressin or saline placebo after 10 min of experimental therapy (65 +/- 6 vs. 42 +/- 4 vs. 43 +/- 6 ml/kg, respectively;P < 0.05). Seven of seven fluid resuscitation, and seven of seven saline placebo pigs died within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy, while 8 of 9 vasopressin animals survived more than 7 days (P < 0.05).     

Effect of small-dose dopamine on mesenteric blood flow and renal function in a pig model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with vasopressin

Vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone) seems a promising alternative to epinephrine for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cardiac arrest victims, mediating a pronounced blood flow shift toward vital organs. We evaluated the effects of small-dose dopamine on splanchnic blood flow and renal function after successful resuscitation with this potent vasoconstrictor in an established porcine CPR model. After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 3 min of CPR, animals received 0.4 U/kg vasopressin and were continuously infused with either dopamine 4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (n = 6), or saline placebo (n = 6). Defibrillation was performed 5 min after drug administration; all animals were observed for 6 h after return of spontaneous circulation. During the postresuscitation phase, average mean +/- SD superior mesenteric artery blood flow was significantly (P = 0.002) higher in the dopamine group compared with the placebo group (1185+/-130 vs 740+/-235 mL/min), whereas renal blood flow was comparable between groups (255+/-40 vs 250+/-85 mL/min). The median calculated glomerular filtration rate had higher values in the dopamine group (70-120 mL/min) than in the placebo group (40-70 mL/min; P = 0.1 at 0 min and P = 0.08 at 360 min). We conclude that small-dose dopamine administration may be useful in improving superior mesenteric artery blood flow and renal function after successful resuscitation with vasopressin. IMPLICATIONS: Long-term survival after cardiac arrest may be determined by the ability to ensure adequate organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and in the postresuscitation phase. In this regard, small-dose dopamine improved postresuscitation blood flow to the mesenteric bed when vasopressin was used as an alternative vasopressor in an animal model of cardiac arrest.     

Vasopressin improves survival after cardiac arrest in hypovolemic shock

Survival after hypovolemic shock and cardiac arrest is dismal with current therapies. We evaluated the potential benefits of vasopressin versus large-dose epinephrine in hemorrhagic shock and cardiac arrest on vital organ perfusion, and the likelihood of resuscitation. In 18 pigs, 35% of the estimated blood volume was withdrawn over 15 min and ventricular fibrillation was induced 5 min later. After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 4 min of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a bolus dose of either 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 7), 0.8 unit/kg vasopressin (n = 7), or saline placebo (n = 4) was administered in a blinded, randomized manner. Defibrillation was attempted 2.5 min after drug administration, and all animals were subsequently observed for 1 h without further intervention. Spontaneous circulation was restored in 7 of 7 vasopressin animals, in 6 of 7 epinephrine pigs, and in 0 of 4 placebo swine. At 5 and 30 min after return of spontaneous circulation, median (minimum and maximum) renal blood flow after epinephrine was 2 (0-31), and 2 (0-48) mL. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively; and after vasopressin 96 (12-161), and 44 (16-105) mL. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively (P: <.01 between groups). Epinephrine animals developed a profound metabolic acidosis by 15 min after return of spontaneous circulation (mean arterial pH, 7.11 +/- 0.01), and by 60 min all epinephrine-treated animals had died. The vasopressin pigs had (P: = 0.015) less acidosis (pH = 7.26+/-0. 04) at corresponding time points, and all survived > or =55 min (P: < 0. 01). In conclusion, treatment of hypovolemic cardiac arrest with vasopressin, but not with large-dose epinephrine or saline placebo, resulted in sustained vital organ perfusion, less metabolic acidosis, and prolonged survival. Based on these findings, clinical evaluation of vasopressin during hypovolemic cardiac arrest may be warranted. IMPLICATIONS: The chances of surviving cardiac arrest in hemorrhagic shock are considered dismal without adequate fluid replacement. However, treatment of hypovolemic cardiac arrest with vasopressin, but not with large-dose epinephrine or saline placebo, resulted in sustained vital organ perfusion and prolonged survival in an animal model of suspended infusion therapy.     

The effects of nifedipine on ventricular fibrillation mean frequency in a porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation

We assessed the effects of a calcium channel blocker versus saline placebo on ventricular fibrillation mean frequency and hemodynamic variables during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Before cardiac arrest, 10 animals were randomly assigned to receive either nifedipine (0.64 mg/kg; n = 5) or saline placebo (n = 5) over 10 min. Immediately after drug administration, ventricular fibrillation was induced. After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 18 min of basic life support CPR, defibrillation was attempted. Ninety seconds after the induction of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation mean frequency was significantly (P < 0.01) increased in nifedipine versus placebo pigs (mean +/- SD: 12.4 +/- 2.1 Hz versus 8 +/- 0.7 Hz). From 2 to 18.5 min after the induction of cardiac arrest, no differences in ventricular fibrillation mean frequency were detected between groups. Before defibrillation, ventricular fibrillation mean frequency was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in nifedipine versus placebo animals (9.7 +/- 1.2 Hz versus 7.1 +/- 1.3 Hz). Coronary perfusion pressure was significantly lower in the nifedipine than in the placebo group from the induction of ventricular fibrillation to 11.5 min of cardiac arrest; no animal had a return of spontaneous circulation after defibrillation. In conclusion, nifedipine, but not saline placebo, prevented a rapid decrease of ventricular fibrillation mean frequency after the induction of cardiac arrest and maintained ventricular fibrillation mean frequency at approximately 10 Hz during prolonged CPR; this was nevertheless associated with no defibrillation success. IMPLICATIONS: This study evaluates the effects of a calcium channel blocker on ventricular fibrillation mean frequency, hemodynamic variables, and resuscitability during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in pigs. Nifedipine, but not saline placebo, prevented a rapid decrease of ventricular fibrillation mean frequency after the induction of cardiac arrest and maintained ventricular fibrillation mean frequency at approximately 10 Hz during prolonged CPR but did not improve resuscitability.     

Milrinone combined with vasopressin improves cardiac index after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a pig model of myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Milrinone used for acute cardiac insufficiency could be of interest during cardiopulmonary resuscitation because of its positive inotropic effects. In this study, the combination of milrinone-vasopressin was compared with epinephrine and vasopressin, as well as with the combination of epinephrine-vasopressin, in reference to hemodynamics. METHODS: Thirty-two pigs underwent ligation of the circumflex coronary artery and induction of ventricular fibrillation lasting for 4 min. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed after randomization to one of four groups: epinephrine (30-microg/kg bolus), vasopressin (0.4-U/kg bolus), epinephrine-vasopressin (15-microg/kg epinephrine bolus, 0.2-U/kg vasopressin bolus), or milrinone-vasopressin (0.4-U/kg vasopressin bolus, 50-microg/kg milrinone bolus over 5 min and a continuous infusion of 0.4 microg.kg.min). The hemodynamic variables were measured before cardiopulmonary resuscitation as well as 4, 8, 15, and 30 min after return of spontaneous circulation. RESULTS: All animals were resuscitated successfully. The animals of the milrinone-vasopressin group displayed significantly (P<0.05) higher cardiac index values (30 min after return of spontaneous circulation: epinephrine, 65.8+/-13.2; vasopressin, 70.7+/-18.3; epinephrine-vasopressin, 69.1+/-36.2; milrinone-vasopressin, 120.7+/-34.8 ml.min.kg) without a decrease in mean arterial pressure or coronary perfusion pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vasopressin-milrinone as compared with epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation leads to an improved cardiac index without relevant decrease of mean arterial pressure or coronary perfusion pressure.     

Milrinone Combined with Vasopressin Improves Cardiac Index after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model of Myocardial Infarction

Background: Milrinone used for acute cardiac insufficiency could be of interest during cardiopulmonary resuscitation because of its positive inotropic effects. In this study, the combination of milrinone-vasopressin was compared with epinephrine and vasopressin, as well as with the combination of epinephrine-vasopressin, in reference to hemodynamics.

Methods: Thirty-two pigs underwent ligation of the circumflex coronary artery and induction of ventricular fibrillation lasting for 4 min. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed after randomization to one of four groups: epinephrine (30-[mu]g/kg bolus), vasopressin (0.4-U/kg bolus), epinephrine-vasopressin (15-[mu]g/kg epinephrine bolus, 0.2-U/kg vasopressin bolus), or milrinone-vasopressin (0.4-U/kg vasopressin bolus, 50-[mu]g/kg milrinone bolus over 5 min and a continuous infusion of 0.4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1). The hemodynamic variables were measured before cardiopulmonary resuscitation as well as 4, 8, 15, and 30 min after return of spontaneous circulation.

Results: All animals were resuscitated successfully. The animals of the milrinone-vasopressin group displayed significantly (P < 0.05) higher cardiac index values (30 min after return of spontaneous circulation: epinephrine, 65.8 +/- 13.2; vasopressin, 70.7 +/- 18.3; epinephrine-vasopressin, 69.1 +/- 36.2; milrinone-vasopressin, 120.7 +/- 34.8 ml [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] kg-1) without a decrease in mean arterial pressure or coronary perfusion pressure.     

Improving standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

To improve the efficiency of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), we evaluated the potential value of impeding respiratory gas exchange selectively during the decompression phase of standard CPR in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation. After 6 min of untreated cardiac arrest, anesthetized farm pigs weighing 30 kg were randomized to be treated with either standard CPR with a sham valve (n = 11) or standard CPR plus a functional inspiratory impedance threshold valve (ITV(TM)) (n = 11). Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) (diastolic aortic minus right atrial pressure) was the primary endpoint. Vital organ blood flow was assessed with radiolabeled microspheres after 6 min of CPR, and defibrillation was attempted 11 min after starting CPR. After 2 min of CPR, mean +/- SEM CPP was 14 +/- 2 mm Hg with the sham valve versus 20 +/- 2 mm Hg in the ITV group (P < 0.006). Significantly higher CPPs were maintained throughout the study when the ITV was used. After 6 min of CPR, mean +/- SEM left ventricular and global cerebral blood flows were 0.10 +/- 0.03 and 0.19 +/- 0.03 mL. min(-1). g(-1) in the Control group versus 0.19 +/- 0.03 and 0.26 +/- 0.03 mL. min(-1). g(-1) in the ITV group, respectively (P < 0.05). Fifteen minutes after successful defibrillation, 2 of 11 animals were alive in the Control group versus 6 of 11 in the ITV group (not significant). In conclusion, use of an inspiratory impedance valve during standard CPR resulted in a marked increase in CPP and vital organ blood flow after 6 min of cardiac arrest.     

Changes in intracranial pressure, coagulation, and neurologic outcome after resuscitation from experimental traumatic brain injury with hetastarch

BACKGROUND: In a model of traumatic brain injury (TBI), 2 protocols compared changes in intracranial pressure (ICP), coagulation, and neurologic outcome after intravenous fluid (IVF) resuscitation with either Hextend (HEX, 6% hetastarch in lactated electrolyte injection) or standard of care, crystalloid plus mannitol (MAN). METHODS: In the nonsurvivor protocol, swine (n = 28) received a fluid percussion TBI and hemorrhage (27 +/- 3 mL/kg). At 30 minutes, resuscitation began with lactated Ringer's (LR) or HEX. After 60 minutes, MAN (1 g/kg) or placebo was given plus supplemental IVF to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) > or = 70 mm Hg for 240 minutes. Swine in the survivor group (n = 15) also underwent TBI and hemorrhage, and resuscitation with HEX was compared to that of normal saline (NS)+MAN. Neurologic outcome and coagulation were evaluated for 72 hours. RESULTS: In the nonsurvivor protocol, HEX, LR+MAN, and HEX+MAN attenuated the time-related rise of ICP and prevented ICP >20 mm Hg versus LR alone (P < .05). HEX alone maintained CPP (relative to baseline) and decreased total IVF by 50% versus LR +/- MAN (P < .05). MAN had no additive effect with HEX. Coagulation, measured by thromboelastograph reaction time (R), was 11 +/- 1 and 9 +/- 1 minutes at baseline and after TBI (before randomization). At 240 minutes after HEX or LR+MAN, R was 6 +/- 1 or 7 +/- 2 minutes, which indicates a hypercoagulable state, but there was no difference between treatments. In the survivor protocol, ICP and CPP were similar with NS+MAN versus HEX, but IVF requirement was 161 +/- 20 versus 28 +/- 3 mL/kg (P < .05). Motor scores were higher on days 2 and 3 with HEX (P < .05). At 72 hours, R was 28 +/- 14 versus 26 +/- 6 minutes with NS+MAN versus HEX, which indicates a hypocoagulable state, but there was no difference between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Hextend as the sole resuscitation fluid after severe TBI reduces fluid requirement, obviates the need for mannitol, improves neurologic outcome, and has no adverse effect on the coagulation profile relative to the crystalloid plus mannitol standard of care.     

Influence of epinephrine on systemic, myocardial, and cerebral acid-base status during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), arterial pH and carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) do not reflect the marked acidosis and hypercapnia seen in venous blood samples during CPR. Epinephrine causes an increase in myocardial and cerebral blood flow during CPR, but the influence on regional venous PCO2 and pH is as yet unknown. Fourteen pigs were allocated to receive either 0.9% saline (n = 7), or 45 micrograms/kg epinephrine (n = 7) after 5 min of ventricular fibrillation and 3 min of open-chest CPR. Blood samples were obtained during CPR from the aorta, pulmonary artery, great cardiac vein, and sagittal sinus before and 90 s and 5 min after drug administration. Regional blood flow was measured with tracer microspheres. Plasma catecholamines were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography in arterial blood. PCO2 90 s after drug administration in arterial, mixed venous, myocardial venous, and cerebral venous blood were (means +/- SD) 36 +/- 8, 67 +/- 9, 74 +/- 14, and 79 +/- 19 mmHg in the control group and 35 +/- 11, 62 +/- 12, 73 +/- 10, and 71 +/- 14 mmHg in the epinephrine group. pH values 90 s after drug administration in the same blood samples were 7.29 +/- 0.11, 7.11 +/- 0.09, 7.04 +/- 0.09, and 7.07 +/- 0.10 in the control group and 7.31 +/- 0.13, 7.17 +/- 0.07, 7.08 +/- 0.08, and 7.07 +/- 0.12 in the epinephrine group. Despite a significant increase in myocardial and cerebral blood flow after epinephrine, PCO2 and pH in all blood samples were not different from those of the control group. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neither vasopressin nor amiodarone improve CPR outcome in an animal model of hypothermic cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND: Aim of this experimental animal study was to investigate the influence of vasopressin and amiodarone on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcome in a pig model of hypothermic cardiac arrest. METHODS: After surface cooling to a core temperature of 26 degrees C, ventricular fibrillation was induced in 14 12-16-week-old domestic pigs. After 15 min of untreated cardiac arrest, a manual closed chest CPR was started and pigs were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: Group 1 pigs (n = 7) received vasopressin 0.4 U kg-1 as initial drug therapy, followed by a combination vasopressin (0.4 U kg-1) and amiodarone (4 mg kg-1) as subsequent drug therapy. Subsequent drug therapy was administered in animals without permanent restoration of spontaneous circulation after a first series of electrical countershocks 10 min after drug administration. Group 2 pigs (n = 7) received saline placebo as initial drug therapy and saline placebo and amiodarone (4 mg kg-1) as subsequent drug therapy. RESULTS: Vasopressin significantly increased coronary perfusion pressure and defibrillation success (successful defibrillation in five of seven Group 1 vs. none of seven Group 2 pigs, P = 0.02). Due to refibrillation within 30-150 s, the 60-min survival rate was not improved by vasopressin. Subsequent drug therapy with amiodarone had no further effect on defibrillation success or the refibrillation rate. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this experimental animal model suggest that vasopressin and amiodarone may not be beneficial for treatment of ventricular fibrillation associated with severe hypothermia when concomitant measures at core rewarming are not applied.     

Cerebral metabolism assessed with microdialysis in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after penetrating liver trauma

In a porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, we evaluated the effects of fluid resuscitation versus arginine vasopressin (AVP) combined with hypertonic-hyperoncotic hydroxyethyl starch solution (HHS) on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and on cerebral metabolism using intracerebral microdialysis. Sixteen anesthetized pigs were subjected to uncontrolled liver bleeding until hemodynamic decompensation, followed by resuscitation using either fluid (n = 8) or AVP/HHS (n = 8). Thirty minutes after drug administration, bleeding was controlled by manual compression, and colloid and crystalloid solutions were administered in both groups. All surviving animals were observed for one hour. After hemodynamic decompensation, fluid resuscitation resulted in a smaller increase of CPP than did AVP/HHS (mean +/- sem; 24 +/- 5 vs 45 +/- 7 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Mean (+/- sem) cerebral venous partial pressure of oxygen was significantly decreased (P < 0.01) 5 min after fluid compared with 5 min after AVP/HHS administration (36 +/- 3 vs 64 +/- 4 torr). Cerebral metabolism was comparable in both groups. In conclusion, AVP/HHS proved to be superior to fluid in the initial phase of therapy with respect to CPP and cerebral oxygenation, but was comparable to fluid regarding cerebral metabolism and secondary cell damage in surviving animals.