腹腔镜直肠悬吊术治疗复发性直肠脱垂13例报告

目的探讨腹腔镜直肠悬吊术治疗复发性直肠脱垂的疗效。方法对13例复发性直肠脱垂行腹腔镜直肠悬吊,重建盆底,肛门环缩治疗。结果 13例腹腔镜直肠悬吊手术均获成功。手术时间2～4h,平均2.5h。术中无大出血、副损伤,术后无肠瘘、感染等并发症。术后住院3～6d,平均4d。13例随访6～24个月,平均13个月,无腹泻、便秘及排便不畅,排便控制功能正常,均无复发。结论对复发性直肠脱垂行腹腔镜手术,可针对性地消除复发因素,疗效确切,手术安全可靠,并发症少。     

腹腔镜直肠悬吊术在完全性直肠脱垂中的个体化应用及体会

目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的术式选择及临床疗效.方法:回顾分析2015年6月至2019年12月为16例完全性直肠脱垂患者行腹腔镜直肠悬吊术及联合其他术式治疗的临床资料,其中5例单纯行腹腔镜直肠悬吊术,6例行腹腔镜直肠悬吊+冗长结肠切除术,3例行腹腔镜直肠悬吊+吻合器痔上黏膜环切术,2例行腹腔镜直肠悬吊+冗长...     

腹腔镜辅助直肠及乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠悬吊固定术治疗完全性直肠脱垂

目的:探讨腹腔镜辅助直肠及乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠悬吊固定术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的临床效果。方法:回顾分析2012年1月至2014年1月为23例完全直肠脱垂患者行腹腔镜辅助直肠、乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠悬吊固定术的临床资料。结果:手术均顺利完成,无一例中转开腹。手术时间105~165 min,平均(132.6±14.2)min;术中出血量20~50 ml,平均(34.5±12.4)ml。术后2例发生尿潴留,余均恢复顺利,无吻合口漏、肠梗阻等严重并发症发生。术后24 h疼痛评分2~5分,平均(3.32±0.85)分;排气时间1~4 d,平均(2.43±0.90)d;住院6~10 d,平均(7.8±2.45)d。术后肛管直肠测压肛门内外括约肌静息状态及力排状态下压力均明显降低。随访12~36个月,无一例复发,患者排便功能良好,无尿潴留、性功能障碍等并发症发生。结论:腹腔镜辅助直肠、乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠悬吊固定术治疗完全性直肠脱垂安全、有效,具有患者创伤小、康复快、外观好等优点,可明显改善患者的临床症状,值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜直肠悬吊固定术治疗直肠重度脱垂

目的探讨腹腔镜直肠悬吊固定术治疗直肠脱垂的临床应用价值。方法1998年3月至2007年2月,对4例完全性直肠脱垂患者进行了腹腔镜直肠悬吊固定术。1例采用缝合固定法,将直肠后壁分离、提高,用丝线缝闭直肠前陷凹,并将直肠后壁悬吊固定于骶骨岬前筋膜上,再将乙状结肠缝合固定在左侧腰大肌筋膜。3例采用网片固定法,将直肠游离到肛提肌水平,用1张6cm×9cm的T字型聚丙烯网片置于直肠后方,网片下缘在肛提肌水平环绕直肠,在直肠前方用丝线缝合网片和直肠浆肌层,再将网片上端在直肠后用疝修补钉夹固定于骶骨岬前筋膜,缝合关闭盆底腹膜。再将乙状结肠缝合固定在左侧腰大肌筋膜。结果4例患者手术均顺利,无中转开腹者。手术时间92.5(80-100)min,出血量6.5(5～10)ml。无并发症发生。术后尿失禁和肛门失禁的症状缓解,术后随访2个月至3年均未见复发与便秘出现。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔镜直肠悬吊固定术创伤小、恢复快和安全有效。     

腹腔镜下直肠乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠悬吊固定术治疗成人完全性直肠脱垂的疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜下直肠乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠悬吊固定术治疗成人完全性直肠脱垂的疗效。方法对2010年5月至2013年5月期间笔者所在医院科室收治的32例成人完全性直肠脱垂患者行腹腔镜下直肠乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠悬吊固定术,总结手术疗效。结果32例患者的手术过程均顺利,无一例中转开腹手术。平均手术时间为114．7min（95～167min）,平均术中出血量为80mL（55～150mL）,术后平均住院时间为9．8d（6～14d）,均全部治愈出院。术后32例患者获访3个月～4年（平均25．6个月）,均无脱垂症状,肛门功能恢复良好,无术后并发症及复发。结论腹腔镜下直肠乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠悬吊固定术治疗成人完全性直肠脱垂的疗效良好,具有创伤小、恢复快、复发率低等优点,是一种具有较高临床应用价值的术式。     

功能性直肠悬吊术：改良Orr‘s直肠悬吊术治疗直肠内脱垂

本文报道３１例经排粪造影诊断的直肠内脱垂行经腹改良Ｏｒｒ＇ｓ直肠悬吊术的结果，其中１６例合并会阴下降综合征，３例合并有内容物的盆底疝，３例结肠通过延迟。２０例附加乙状结肠切除、３例附加结肠次全切除、２２例附加子宫前倾位固定、８例附加直肠前突修补术。     

功能性直肠悬吊术─—改良Orr’s直肠悬吊术治疗直肠内脱垂

本文报道３１例经排粪造影诊断的直肠内脱垂行经腹改良Ｏｒｒ’ｓ直肠悬吊术的结果，其中１６例合并会阴下降综合征，３例合并有内容物的盆底疝，３例全结肠通过延迟。２０例附加乙状结肠切除、３例附加结肠次全切除、２２例附加子宫前倾位固定、８例附加直肠前突修补术。术后平均随访２．５年。治愈２５例（８１％），好转４例（１３％），无效２例（６％）。作者认为应个体化地设计手术方案，并提出功能性直肠悬吊术：即术中不作广泛的解剖，适当双侧或单侧直肠悬吊，避免“矫枉过正”，同时处理其他功能解剖异常。本文讨论了该术式的指征和有关排便功能的问题。     

涤纶布用于直肠悬吊术治疗直肠脱垂38例报告

目的探讨涤纶布用于直肠悬吊术治疗直肠脱垂的临床疗效。方法对采用涤纶布条行直肠骶骨悬吊术治疗直肠脱垂38例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果术后除2例切13感染．1例并发尿潴留外．其余35例无任何并发症发生。38例患者均治愈出院，平均住院时间12d。本组病例均获随访．随访时间1～9年．随访期间无一例复发，均能进行日常体力劳动。结论用涤纶布条行直肠悬吊术治疗直肠脱垂，疗效确切．操作简便，创伤小．值得临床推广。     

腹腔镜经腹膜外子宫悬吊术治疗子宫脱垂效果观察

目的观察腹腔镜腹膜外子宫悬吊术治疗子宫脱垂的效果。方法随机将2017-03—2018-01间唐河县人民医院收治的72例子宫脱垂患者分为2组,各36例。对照组行经阴道全子宫切除术,观察组行腹膜外子宫悬吊术。结果观察组治疗总有效率、住院指标、术后PISQ-12评分及并发症发生率均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜经腹膜外子宫悬吊术治疗子宫脱垂,可有效降低术中出血量,缩短手术时间,降低并发症发生率,促进患者术后康复。     

腹壁自体筋膜盆底悬吊术与腹腔镜下子宫颈悬吊术治疗盆底器官脱垂的疗效观察

目的:探讨腹壁自体筋膜盆底悬吊术与腹腔镜下子宫颈悬吊术治疗盆底器官脱垂的临床应用价值及对生活质量的影响。方法:将60例盆底器官脱垂患者随机分为观察组与对照组,每组30例,观察组行腹壁自体筋膜盆底悬吊术,对照组行腹腔镜下子宫颈悬吊术,应用盆腔器官脱垂定量分度法评估手术效果。术后6个月采用盆底功能障碍问卷短表对患者生活质量进行调查,采用盆腔器官脱垂尿失禁性功能问卷对患者性生活质量进行调查。结果:观察组手术时间[(72.32±8.34)min]、术中出血量[(57.43±8.52)ml]、尿管留置时间[(3.23±0.54)d]、术后住院时间[(7.32±0.69)d]均多于对照组[(53.34±6.88)min、(45.65±7.43)ml、(2.39±0.87)d、(6.27±0.75)d],差异有统计学意义(P0.01),术后两组Aa、Ba、C、D、Ap、Bp等指示点位置术后均较术前明显上升,其中观察组上升水平明显高于对照组,更接近解剖学位置(P0.01),盆底功能障碍问卷、排便功能障碍问卷及泌尿功能障碍问卷评分观察组明显低于对照组,盆腔器官脱垂尿失禁性功能问卷中情感、生理、总分等观察组均高于对照组(P0.05)。结论:腹壁自体筋膜盆底悬吊术与腹腔镜下子宫颈悬吊术在治疗盆底器官脱垂中均具有良好的临床治疗效果,其中腹壁自体筋膜盆底悬吊术治疗盆底器官脱垂恢复盆底器官解剖更理想,对患者术后生活质量影响较小。     

Outcome of Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Complete Rectal Prolapse in Patients Older than 70 Years Versus Younger Patients

Purpose To evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse in patients above 70 years of age, compared with that in younger patients.Methods Between October 1997 and September 2001, 14 consecutive patients with complete rectal prolapse underwent laparoscopic rectopexy. Nine patients were aged 70 years or older, and five were aged under 70 years. All of the patients were ambulant and well enough to tolerate surgery under general anesthesia. Each patient was monitored pre- and postoperatively, for fecal incontinence, constipation, recurrent prolapse, morbidity, and mortality.Results The median follow-up period was 34.5 (range 5–54) months. No significant differences were noted in the hospitalization, incidence of complications, recurrence rate, and functional outcome.Conclusion The outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy in elderly patients is similar to that in younger patients. Therefore, advanced age alone should not be a contraindication to laparoscopic rectopexy.     

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Total Rectal Prolapse

Purpose Total rectal prolapse is a devastating disorder causing constipation and anal incontinence. We compared open and laparoscopic surgical approaches in a limited series.Methods The subjects of this study were 23 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures (LP group) and 17 patients who underwent open procedures (OP group) for rectal prolapse. We assessed the preoperative colonic transit time, postoperative pain scoring, pre- and postoperative anal functions, and changes in constipation and related symptoms.Results The median operation time was 140.8min for the LP group and 113.1min for the OP group (P = 0.037). The median postoperative hospital stay was 4.8 days after the LPs and 9.6 days after the OPs (P = 0.001). Less analgesia was needed in the early postoperative period after the LPs (P = 0.007). While more than 70% improvement in continence was seen in the patients who underwent OPs, it was about 85% in those who underwent LPs. Improvement in constipation and related symptoms were similar in both groups. More than 30% of patients still suffered from hard stools and other symptoms of constipation. The colonic transit times were reduced in about 50% of patients who had suffered constipation in both groups. There was no incidence of recurrence in the median follow-up period.Conclusion Although transabdominal rectopexy has been performed conventionally for rectal prolapse for many years, laparoscopic rectopexy and laparoscopic resection rectopexy are associated with lower morbidity and less postoperative pain. We eliminated the total prolapse and cured incontinence in almost all patients, with a short hospital stay.     

Laparoscopic Management of Rectal Prolapse

Rectal prolapse can be a disabling condition for those affected. Treatment has historically been by transanal or abdominal approaches, with transanal approaches tending to have lower morbidity, and abdominal approaches having lower recurrence rates. With the advent of laparoscopy, many of the numerous described abdominal operations have been reported with a minimally invasive approach. Although few randomized data exist, laparoscopic operations appear to provide equal rectal fixation to open surgery, with less morbidity. Coexistent symtoms such as fecal incontinence and constipation must be evaluated before surgery, so that the operation can be tailored to the needs of the individual patient. Patients with severe constipation are often offered a concomitant sigmoid resection, although this does increase the potential for complications. Patients with incontinence, diarrhea, or otherwise normal function can be offered a rectopexy without resection. This study was presented at the ASCRS/SSAT symposium on minimally invasive management of rectal diseases, DDW, Los Angeles, May 2006     

直肠三间隙注射治疗小儿直肠脱垂146例

为了探索治疗小儿直肠脱垂的有效方法，采用5％明矾注射液，按3个部位分别注入骨盆直肠间隙或直肠后深间隙，术后配合换药休息。结果显示，平均住院10d（3～18d），未出现肛管直肠狭窄，随访1～10年，无复发，有效率100％。结果表明，以5％明矾注射液行直肠三间隙注射治疗小儿直肠脱垂，疗效显著，无明显并发症和后遗症。     

Laparoscopic rectopexy

Abdominal rectopexy has been advocated as the treatment of choice for complete rectal prolapse. Recurrence rates are low raging from 0–12% and fecal continence has been documented to improve in 3–75% of patients. As most patients are elderly and not always fit enough to undergo abdominal procedure, various perineal approaches have been advocated. Depending on the type and extent of the operation, these procedures have a recurrence of up to 38%. Laparoscopic rectopexy represents the latest development in the evolution of surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. This technique aims to combine the good functional outcome of the open abdominal procedure with the low postoperative morbidity of minimal invasive surgery. We present a laparosocpic rectopexy on 72-year-old lady with a 10-year history of fecal incontinence and mucosal rectal prolapse. Electronic supplementary material is available for this article at Presented at the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Annual Meeting, Dallas, April 28, 2006     

Laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of persisting rectal prolapse in children

Background The repair of choice for persistent rectal prolapse (PRP) in children is disputed. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSRP) is effective in adults, but its usefulness in pediatric PRP is unknown. We compared LSRP with posterosagittal rectopexy (PSRP). Methods Sixteen children, with a median age of 6.5 years (range, 0.8–16.8) and duration of symptoms of 2.8 years (range, 0.5–10.2), underwent surgery for PRP. Eight (1991–2000) had PSRP, and eight (2002–2005) had LSRP. Three patients with LSRP were healthy; the others had mental retardation and epilepsy (n = 1), cerebral palsy (n = 1), Aspeger’s syndrome (n = 1), meningomyelocele (n = 1), and bladder extrophy (n = 1). Preoperative cologram (n = 6), sigmoideoscopy (n = 3), and anorectal manometry (n = 2) were normal in patients with LSRP. In LSRP, the rectum was mobilized and sutured to the sacral periosteum. Results Median operation time for LSRP was 80 min (range, 62–90) and for PSRP 40 min (range, 25–70) (p < 0.05); median hospital time was 6 days (range, 3–8) for LSRP and 6 days (range, 3–9) for PSRP (not significant). Six patients with LSRP had a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 4–24). None have had recurrences, and two patients (33%) require laxatives. Of the patients with PSRP, two (25%) had recurrence and underwent abdominal rectopexy with sigmoid resection. Conclusion Medium-term results indicate that LSPR is effective in pediatric PRP. Constipation is the only postoperative problem in a significant proportion of patients.     

Laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness anorectal prolapse in children: an effective outpatient procedure

Background/Purpose

Our approach to full-thickness anorectal prolapse has transitioned to laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSRP). The purpose of this study was to describe the indications, technique, and postoperative outcomes for LSRP.

Methods

Rectopexy was performed using 3 or 4 laparoscopic ports. Redundant rectum was retracted from the pelvis, and the posterior rectal wall was secured to the sacral promontory using 3 permanent sutures.

Results

Nineteen children (7 girls) underwent LSRP from March 2003 to January 2008. Mean age was 6.2 ± 3.6 years. Three patients had prior perineal operations: 2 sacrococcygeal teratoma resections and 1 pull-through for Hirschsprung disease. One patient had cystic fibrosis, and another had Prader-Willi syndrome. The remaining children had either chronic constipation or idiopathic prolapse. All patients were treated preoperatively with laxatives. Two patients received antegrade continent enemas. Length of stay was 1 ± 0.8 days, with only the first 5 patients admitted to the hospital. The patient with Prader-Willi syndrome had a full-thickness recurrence (5%) owing to obsessive-compulsive behavior. Partial mucosal prolapse occurred in 2 patients. There were no other complications.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic suture rectopexy is an effective minimally invasive method to treat full-thickness rectal prolapse in children from various etiologies. It can be performed as an outpatient procedure with minimal morbidity and low recurrence rate (5%).     

Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients

Background We report the results of patients treated from January 2000 to June 2004 for full-thickness rectal prolapse with trans-abdominal surgery in Helsinki. Methods Sixty-five of 75 patients were treated laparoscopically, with a 6% conversion rate. Ten patients were operated on openly. Half of the patients were scored as American Society for Anesthesiologists III or IV. Results The operation time was similar in the laparoscopic and the open rectopexy procedures (p = 0.15), whereas laparoscopic resection rectopexy was more time-consuming compared to the open procedure (p = 0.007). Intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic surgery was minimal in comparison to open surgery (p = 0.006). Patients treated laparoscopically had a shorter median hospital stay than those treated with an open procedure (rectopexy, 3 and 7 days, respectively; resection rectopexy, 4 and 7.5 days, respectively) (p < 0.00001). There was no mortality and minor morbidity. During follow-up, there were two prolapse recurrences. All surgical techniques improved fecal continence considerably. Eighty-four percent of rectopexy patients and 92% of resection rectopexy patients considered the surgical outcome to be excellent or good. Conclusions Both rectopexy and resection rectopexy cure prolapse with good results and can be performed safely in older and debilitated patients. The laparoscopic approach enables a shortened hospital stay and is well tolerated in elderly patients.     

Ⅱ～Ⅲ度直肠脱垂的消痔灵注射疗效分析

目的：探讨Ⅱ～Ⅲ度直肠脱垂的注射疗法的疗效。方法：收集1990．12～2003．12的Ⅱ～Ⅲ度直肠脱垂行消痔灵注射68例疗效资料，术后随访3～10年。结果：有效率94％，且无严重并发症和后遗症。结论：消痔灵注射术对直肠脱垂是一种痛苦小、恢复快、易于推广的治疗方法。