Implanted cardioverters-defibrillators in the treatment of arrhythmias and prevention of sudden death

AIM: To present 15-year experience in use of implantable cardioverters-defibrillators (ICD) in patients with life threatening arrhythmias and a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 151 patients (116 males and 35 females aged 12-75 years) with life threatening arrhythmias and ICD were studied. RESULTS: There were neither complications nor lethality. Electrocardiotherapy was performed in 89 (58.9%) patients 4.5 +/- 9.4 months, on the average, after ICD implantation. Attacks of ventricular tachycardia (VT) were arrested by antitachycardia stimulation (974 episodes, 37.5 +/- 92.5 per patient, on the average). Effective cardioversion in VT was observed in 63 (41.7%) cases. Episodes of rapid ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation were stopped by defibrillation shocks in 28 (18.5%) patients. Additional surgical interventions were made in 3 patients because of electrodes dislocation, in 1--because of electrode brakage and in 1--suppuration of the bed. Fifteen patients (9%) died during follow-up because of cardiac failure (n = 13), cancer (n = 1), unknown cause (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Clinical application of ICD is not only treatment of arrhythmia and prevention of SCD but it is also a method of diagnosis, collection and accumulation of information about the disease course.     

Intraoperative Mapping is Not Necessary for VT Surgery

Surgical ablation of ventricular tachycardia is generally guided by the results of pre- and intraoperative cardiac mapping. However, in certain situations intraoperative cardiac mapping may not be possible and, therefore, surgery has to be based on information obtained preoperatively. This raises the question whether intraoperative mapping is necessary for the success of this approach. We describe our experience with encircling endocar-dial cryoablation for ischemic VT and examine the contribution of intraoperative mapping for this procedure. Thirty-three patients with inducibie VT refractory to medical therapy and a well defined anatomic scar were considered for surgery. All patients underwent baseline electrophysiology study and intraoperative mapping was attempted during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. In 14 patients, VT was inducibie intraoperatively (Group 1) and surgical ablation was guided by this information, whereasin 19patients, VT could not be mapped for various reasons (Group 2). Reasons for failure to obtain intraoperative map included noninducibility (3), nonsustained VT (8), polymorphic VT (4), VF (3), and incessant VT with hemodynamic collapse and cardiac arrest (1). The two groups did not differ with respect to age, location of myocardial infarction, or preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction. The operative procedures were similarin the twogroups with respect to aortic cross clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, number of cryoablation lesions, concomitant revascularization, aneurysmectomy, and ICD implantation. Encircling endocardial cryoablation was performed in 32 patients and one patient underwent partial right ventricular free wall disconnection (RV infarct). Thirteen patients underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (5 in Group 1 and 8 in group 2). One patient had prophylactic ICD patches (Group 1). The mean LVEF pre- and postoperatively were similar in the two groups. One patient died postoperatively. Three patients had recurrent VT perioperatively: one patient was treated with amiodarone and two had an ICD implantation. During long-term follow-up (mean 5 years), survival was similar in the two groups. Conclusions: Encircling endocardial cryoablation for ventricular tachycardia is a useful surgical technique in selected patients. Preoperative cardiac mapping is useful in defining a surgical plan, but intraoperative mapping is not crucial to the success of encircling endocardial cryoablation.     

Effects of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Ventricular Arrhythmias: Results with Electrophysiological Testing and Long-Term Follow-Up

Myocardial revascularization was performed in 56 patients with coronary artery disease who presented with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 39) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 17). There were 46 men and 10 women, aged 65 ± 10 years. Three vessel (n = 42) or left main disease (n = 4) was present in 82%. Left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 36%± 11%. Electrophysioiogical studies were performed preoperatively in all patients; 50 (89%) had inducible ventricular arrhythmias. Sustained monomorphic VT was induced in 40 patients (cycle length 284 ± 61 msec). Reproducible symptomatic nonsustained VT was induced in four patients and ventricular fibrillation in six patients, while six patients had no inducible arrhythmia. Preoperatively the patients with inducible VT failed 3.3 ± 1.2 drug trials during electrophysiological studies. In addition to coronary bypass, 22 patients also received an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), 26 patients received prophylactic ICD patches, and 1 patient had resection of a false aneurysm. There were no perioperative deaths. Postoperative electrophysiological studies were performed in all 56 surgical survivors. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia could not be induced in the six patients who had no inducible VT preoperatively and in 13 of 40 (33%) with preoperatively inducible sustained VT or in 19 of 50 (38%) patients with any previously inducible ventricular arrhythmia, thus a totaJ of 25 patients (45%) had no inducible VT postoperatively. Of the remaining, 11 patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs alone, 11 had already received an ICD (combined with drugs in 7), and another 9 received the ICD postoperatively (combined with drugs in 4). At a mean foJJow-up of 28 ± 21 months there were 11 deaths (20%): 2 sudden, 5 nonsudden cardiac, and 4 noncardiac deaths. There were 16 nonfatal VT recurrences (29%): 14 among patients with persistently inducible arrhythmias, and onJy 2 among those with no inducible arrhythmia postoperatively (P = 0.004); 13 occurred in patients with an ICD (P = 0.01). Thus among these patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias who underwent revascuJarization, 45% had no inducible arrhythmia postoperatively with 33% of those with preoperatively inducible sustained VT apparently rendered noninducible by revascularization, while the majority (70%) remained free of major arrhythmic events during long-term follow-up. We conclude that myocardial revascularization alone can result in no ventricular arrhythmia induction in selected patients with VT inducible prior to surgery. Long-term follow-up of such patients indicates a low sudden death and arrhythmia recurrence rate. Furthermore, in patients with persistently inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary revascuJarization, the sudden death rate is low despite a high frequency of nonfatal arrhythmia recurrence when antiarrhythmic medications are guided by programmed stimulation or an ICD is used.     

Characteristics and relevance of clustering ventricular arrhythmias in defibrillator recipients

INTRODUCTION: Studies of recurrent ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) have been limited to "electrical storms," where recurrent arrhythmias necessitate repeated external cardioversions or defibrillations. Patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may also suffer frequently recurrent arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to analyze the temporal pattern and the clinical relevance of clustering ventricular arrhythmias in ICD recipients. METHODS: The incidence and the type of arrhythmias were determined by reviewing stored electrograms. VT/VF clusters were defined as the occurrence of three or more adequate and successful ICD interventions within 2 weeks. Two hundred and fourteen consecutive ICD recipients were followed during an average of 3.3 +/- 2.2 years (698 patient-years). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (24%) suffered 98 VT/VF clusters 21 +/- 22 months after ICD implantation, 93% of these clusters consisting of recurrent regular VT. Monomorphic VT as index event leading to ICD implantation was the only factor predicting VT/VF clusters. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the combined end-point of death or heart transplantation showed a 5-year event-free survival of 67% versus 87% in patients with and without clusters, respectively (P = 0.026). Adjusted hazard ratios for death or heart transplantation in the group with arrhythmia clusters was 3.5 (95% confidence interval 1.5-7.9 P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: VT/VF clusters are frequent late after ICD implantation particularly in patients who had VT as index-event. As arrhythmias and recurrent ICD interventions are responsible for an important morbidity, there is a possible role for a prophylactic intervention. Furthermore, VT/VF clusters are an independent marker of increased risk of death or need for heart transplantation.     

The impact of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II in a university hospital--do all patients with myocardial infarction and reduced left ventricular function need an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and severely compromised left ventricular ejection fraction are at high risk to die from sudden cardiac death. The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator implantation Trial II (MADIT II) shows a significant benefit of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy compared to standard treatment alone in this selected group of patients. The objective of the present study was to investigate the number of patients who will fulfil the MADIT II criteria and are candidates for prophylactic ICD implantation. METHODS AND MATERIAL: From January to December 2001 a total of 2653 patients underwent coronary angiography at our institution due to angina pectoris, positive exercise stress testing, pathological SPECT myocardial perfusion images, suspected dilated cardiomyopathy or ventricular arrhythmias. According to the MADIT II inclusion criteria patients with significant coronary artery disease (diameter stenosis > 50%), ejection fraction < 0.31% and previous myocardial infarction were included. Exclusion criteria were acute coronary syndromes, patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias or an existing indication for ICD therapy, and patients with coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty within the past or following three months. RESULTS: Out of 2653 patients 185 (7%) had an ejection fraction less than 0.31, 149 (5.6%) showed significant coronary artery stenosis and 70 (2.6%) patients fulfilled the MADIT II criteria. The mean age of these patients was 68 +/- 9 years, the left ventricular ejection fraction 24 +/- 6. In 37 patients an ICD system was implanted according to the existing guidelines. 70 patients met the MADIT II inclusion criteria, resulting in an increase of 189% of ICD implantations per year. CONCLUSION: 2.6% out of 2653 patients who were referred to coronary angiography fulfilled the criteria of MADIT II. The expanding indication for ICD therapy will result in an annual increase of 70 (189%) prophylactic ICD implantations in our study population.     

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Chagas' Disease: Are They Different from Patients with Coronary Disease?

Chagas' disease is a parasitic affliction, endemic to certain regions of South America, which may lead to a chronic dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Ten Chagasic patients were compared to 18 coronary patients undergoing transvenous ICD implantation for ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), or aborted cardiac arrest. Indications for ICD implantation were either drug intolerance or refractoriness, or no inducible tachyarrhythmia at EPS. There were no statistically significant differences between the Chagas and coronary artery disease groups with respect to age (60.2 vs 62.6 yrs], NYHA Class II (50% vs 62%), ejection fraction (31.1% vs 29.7%), and incidence of cardiac arrest (20% vs 33%), respectively. The following ICD implant and long-term follow-up variables were compared between the two groups: pacing threshold (0.94 V vs 0.95V), defibrillation threshold (19.5 J vs 19.6 J), number of VT episodes (414 vs 435), number of spontaneous VT terminations (86 vs 187), percent efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (93.9% vs 92.1 %), and total number of shocks (112 vs 145). These differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that patients with Chagas' disease, compared with coronary artery disease patients, have similar clinical characteristics leading to ICD implantation. Furthermore, no differences were found with respect to ICD and long-term follow-up characteristics between the two groups.     

Efficacy of metoprolol and sotalol in the prevention of recurrences of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

ICDs provide protection against sudden cardiac death in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Nevertheless, most ICD recipients receive adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy to reduce the number of recurrent episodes and ICD discharges. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of metoprolol and d,l-sotalol in preventing VT/VF recurrences in patients with an ICD in a prospective, randomized trial. One hundred patients (83 men, 17 women; mean age 59 years, SD +/- 11 years) were randomized to receive metoprolol or sotalol after implantation of an ICD. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, underlying cardiac disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA class assessment and clinical arrhythmia. The median follow-up was 728 days (25th percentile: 530 days, 75th percentile: 943 days) in the metoprolol group and 727 days (25th percentile: 472 days, 75th percentile: 1,223 days) in the sotalol group (P = 0.52). Thirty-three patients treated with metoprolol and 30 patients receiving sotalol had at least one episode during the follow-up. Event-free survival curves were generated for the two treatment arms using the Kaplan-Meier method and showed no significant difference (P = 0.68). Eight patients treated with metoprolol and six patients treated with sotalol died during follow-up. Total mortality was not significantly different between the two study groups (P = 0.43). Metoprolol is as efficacious as sotalol in preventing VT/VF recurrences in patients with an ICD.     

主动脉球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死所致的心源性休克和心脏破裂中的应用

目的 对采用主动脉内球囊反搏（IABP）治疗的心源性休克和心脏破裂病人的住院死亡情况进行回顾性分析。方法 对心源性休克和心脏破裂的28例病人，均安装IABP，其中20例进行了冠状动脉造影。13例接受了冠状动脉成形术（PTCA），冠脉旁路移植术（CABG）或心脏外科手术。结果 1例因急诊血管成形失败而行急诊CABG成功，11例急诊血管成形（直接PTCA）开通了梗死相关动脉（IRA），12例（42.9%)存活，16例死亡（57.1%)；11例因休克死亡；4例心脏破裂因没有手术干扰的时机死亡；1例游离壁破裂因心肌坏死面积过大死于手术台上；还有1例病人在出院7d后死于室颤，在所有无心脏破裂的心源性休克病人中，与接受PTCA和CABG的病人相比，未接受PTCA和CABG的病人的死亡率较高（81.8%vs16.7%)。所有心脏破裂的病人无一存活，死亡率100%。结论 使用IABP对于急性心肌梗死（AMI）所致的心源性休克有显著的效果。但仅使用IABP结合常规治疗而不开通IRA并不能提高这些病人的生存率。心脏破裂的病人若不能及时修补缺损，使用IABP仅能延长病人的存活时间。不能改善病人的生存率。     

Subxiphoid Approach for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients with Previous Coronary Bypass Surgery

From February 1988 until August 1991, 28 patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) received implantable Cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy via a subxiphoid approach. Only one patient required conversion to a median sternotomy incision. The mean defibrillation threshold was 11.9 ± 4.4 J. The mean R wave was 8.2 ± 3.7 mV. One perioperative death occurred due to heart failure (mortality rate 1/28 [3.50%]). No patient required reexploration for bleeding. The subxiphoid method for ICD electrode implantation is safe and reliable in patients with prior CABG surgery.     

Time to First Shock in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Patients with Chagas Cardiomyopathy

The time to first ICD shock has been extensively studied in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there are no published data on ICD shocks in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy (ChC). The occurrence of the first appropriate ICD shock during the first 6 months of follow-up in 20 patients with ChC (group 1) and 35 CAD patients (group 2) was analyzed retrospectively. All patients had received a third-generation pectoral ICD for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF). Indications for ICD implantation were refractoriness to drug therapy or noninducibility of VT/VF at EPS in cardiac arrest survivors. Results: The mean age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and sex in groups I and II were 57.4 ± 7 years versus 64 ± 9 (P < 0.01), 30.9%± 10% versus 32.9%± 10% (P = NS), and 10 men versus 31 women (P < 0.005), respectively. Six months after ICD implantation, 85% (17/20) group I patients received appropriate ICD shocks versus 51 % (18/35) in group 2, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.02, RR: 1.65, OR: 5.35). Conclusions: The incidence of appropriate ICD shocks within the first 6 months postimplantation was significantly higher in ChC patients than in CAD patients. ChC patients were younger and more often women than CAD patients.     

Incidence and Characteristics of Appropriate and Inappropriate Therapies in Recipients of ICD Implanted for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

Background: We evaluated the number of appropriate and inappropriate therapies for ventricular tachyarrhythmias and trigger mechanisms in 55 MADIT II (MII)-like (group 1) and 86 SCD-HeFT-like (group 2) patients.
Methods and Results: We analyzed 399 appropriate episodes in 31 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) implanted according to the MII trial indications, and 502 appropriate episodes in 47 patients matching the SCD-HeFT trial criteria (mean follow-up in both groups = 33 ± 19 months). In group 1, 39 treated episodes were inappropriate (9% of all episodes), while in group 2, 76 episodes were treated inappropriately (15% of all episodes). At least one episode of inappropriate ICD therapy was recorded in 18% of patients in group 1 (n = 10) and in 22% of patients in group 2 (n = 19).
Conclusions: Our study supports the implantation of ICD as primary prevention in patients who are at risk of sudden cardiac death, although the proportion of inappropriate ICD interventions remains high.     

Results of Electrophysiological Testing and Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients Sustaining Cardiac Arrest Only While Receiving Type IA Antiarrhythmic Agents

Therapeutic management of patients sustaining a cardiac arrest while receiving antiarrhythmic agents can be difficult since the role of the drug in possibly facilitating the arrhythmia is often difficult to define. To determine if the response to programmed stimulation could give insight into which patients may have experienced a drug-induced cardiac arrest, we studied 29 patients (61 +/- 9 years) with no prior history of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) who suffered a cardiac arrest only while receiving type Ia antiarrhythmic agents. Patients with documented myocardial infarction, acute ischemia, electrolyte abnormalities, or torsade de pointes were excluded from the study. Twenty-four patients had coronary artery disease with prior myocardial infarction (ejection fraction 28% +/- 9%) and five patients had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction 31% +/- 6%). During baseline electrophysiological testing, 19 patients (66%) had inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias: uniform VT, n = 14 (group I), polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation, n = 5 (group II). Ten patients (group III) had no inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias. To determine if rechallenge with a type Ia agent could facilitate induction of a sustained ventricular arrhythmia in group III, eight patients underwent ten electrophysiological studies during therapy with either procainamide or quinidine. Only two patients developed sustained VT in response to programmed stimulation. Patients in groups I and II received therapy guided by electrophysiological testing, including antiarrhythmic agents alone (n = 8), subendocardial resection (n = 4), or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (n = 7). Patients in group III received antiarrhythmic agents empirically (n = 3), or for treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias (n = 2) or nonsustained VT (n = 1). In addition, four patients in group III received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. During a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 27 months (range: 1 day-84 months) 13 patients died suddenly or received a defibrillator shock preceded by syncope or presyncope: group I: n = 5; group II: n = 2; group III: n = 6. In conclusion: (1) most patients sustaining a cardiac arrest only in the presence of type Ia antiarrhythmic agents have inducible sustained VT in the absence of antiarrhythmic agents, and (2) the risk of recurrent VT persists in patients without inducible sustained arrhythmias in the drug-free state, regardless of whether they manifest inducible arrhythmias after rechallenge with a type Ia agent.     

Significance of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Their Prevention by Low-Dose Sotalol: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND: The single most frequent complication after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is the occurrence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias leading to a prolonged hospital stay. Although several drugs have been used to treat these arrhythmias, effective prevention was only possible with beta-blocking drugs in selected patients. It was, therefore, the aim of the present study to evaluate the significance of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in presence of today's cardioprotective management in a broad spectrum of patients and to assess the possible preventive effect and safety of low-dose sotalol after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 220 consecutive patients referred for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to 80 mg sotalol twice daily (n = 110) or matching placebo (n = 110) for 3 months with the first dose given 2 hours before surgery. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Low-dose sotalol reduced the rate of supraventricular arrhythmias from 43% (placebo) to 25% (sotalol, P <.01), which was atrial fibrillation in 83%, flutter in 7%, and other supraventricular arrhythmias in 10%. Only 7% of all arrhythmias were observed after day 9. Hospital stay was 11 +/- 4 days in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias versus 9 +/- 2 days (P <.001) in patients without. On the fourth postoperative day, heart rate was lower in the sotalol group (75 +/- 12 versus 86 +/- 14 beats per min; P <.0001), but QTc was not significantly prolonged (sotalol, 0.44 +/- 0.03; placebo, 0.43 +/- 0.03; P, ns). Study medication had to be discontinued due to side effects in 6.4% of sotalol and 3.6% of placebo patients (P, ns), but relevant side effects occurred only in two sotalol patients late after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that without antiarrhythmic therapy the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is high (43%) and that supraventricular arrhythmias were associated with a prolonged hospital stay (+/-2 days). Prophylactic treatment with low-dose sotalol reduced the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias significantly (by 40%), thereby reducing overall hospital stay in treated patients. Because more than 90% of all supraventricular arrhythmic episodes occurred within 10 days after surgery and considering the small proarrhythmic effect of sotalol late after surgery, prophylactic treatment with sotalol may be recommended for the first 10 postoperative days to safely reduce supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Outcomes and in-hospital treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation by early defibrillation

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the in-hospital treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and underlying structural heart disease in patients who survive ventricular fibrillation (VF) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a region with a high survival rate after hospital discharge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all patients presenting in Olmsted County, Minnesota, who had experienced OHCA between November 1990 and December 2000 and who underwent defibrillation of VF by an emergency medical service system. RESULTS: Of 200 patients who experienced VF arrest, 138 (69%) survived to hospital admission (7 died in the emergency department before admission), and 79 (40%) were discharged. Of patients who were discharged, 37 (47%) had a reversible cause of the arrest (perimyocardial infarction) and received treatment of the primary process. The other 42 patients who were discharged had ischemic coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=25), nonischemic CHD (n=10), or idiopathic VF (n=7). Four of the patients with CHD but no left ventricular dysfunction were treated with coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention alone. A total of 52 patients (66%) were candidates for electrophysiologic testing. Of these patients, 48 (92%) underwent electrophysiologic testing; of these patients, 10 received amiodarone alone, and 35 received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (of whom 3 also received amiodarone). Patients who did not receive ICD therapy typically presented before 1998 with CHD and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention only. Of 79 patients who were discharged, 14 (18%) with an ICD have received subsequent shocks. Nineteen (24%) of 79 patients have died, 5 of a primary cardiac etiology (including 2 with repeated OHCA). CONCLUSIONS: The VF OHCA survival rate is high in the setting of rapid defibrillation, with 40% of patients being discharged from the hospital. By the end of the 10-year study, more patients were receiving antiarrhythmic therapy, in particular ICD implantation, after hospital admission. Overall, the long-term survival in patients with VF OHCA is favorable.     

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major healthcare problem worldwide. The majority of SCD events occur in patients with clinically recognized heart disease and most episodes result from ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy prevents SCD in specific patient populations. Significant progress in the design and technology has been made since the Food and Drug Administration first approved the ICD in 1985. First-generation ICDs were large, were implanted in the abdomen, required a thoracotomy for placing epicardial defibrillation patches, and were nonprogrammable. Contemporary ICDs have been substantially downsized, are implanted via a transvenous approach, and are multiprogrammable. Device implantation has been simplified to be similar to that of a permanent pacemaker. In addition to treating life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, ICDs now treat bradyarrhythmias, atrial arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure. The purpose of this article is to describe the evidence supporting the use of ICD therapy and to explain the current devices used in clinical practice.     

Efficacy of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients Presenting with Cardiac Arrest

The efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) incorporated into implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) was assessed in 29 consecutive survivors of cardiac arrest, not attributable to acute myocardial infarction, ischemia, or drug and electrolyte effects. The cohort included 25 men and 4 women with a mean age of 65 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 29%. Seventeen patients had coronary artery disease, 11 had nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, and 1 had long QT syndrome. Programmed stimulation yielded monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 17 patients, polymorphic VT in 6, and no inducible VT in 6. During a mean follow-up of 22 months, a total of 91 episodes of monomorphic VT occurred, 73 of which were successfully pace terminated (83%). Monomorphic VT amenable to pace termination recurred only in the group that had this arrhythmia inducible. The recurrent arrhythmias in the 12 patients having either no inducible VT or polymorphic VT were all rapid VTs, having a cycle length < 220 ms; and therefore, not amenable to pace termination. These results suggest that ATP incorporated into ICDs is useful in survivors of cardiac arrest and may significantly reduce the number of shocks that these patients would otherwise receive. Programmed stimulation may also help to define those patients who would receive the maximum benefit from ATP.     

The clinical challenge of preventing sudden cardiac death immediately after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Unfortunately, of all patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (MI), usually in the form of ST-elevation MI, 25–35% will die of sudden cardiac death (SCD) before receiving medical attention, most often from ventricular fibrillation. For patients who reach the hospital, prognosis is considerably better and has improved over the years. Reperfusion therapy, best attained with primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared to thrombolysis, has made a big difference in reducing the risk of SCD early and late after ST-elevation MI. In-hospital SCD due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias is manageable, with either preventive measures or drugs or electrical cardioversion. There is general agreement for secondary prevention of SCD post-MI with implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) when malignant ventricular arrhythmias occur late (>48 h) after an MI, and are not due to reversible or correctable causes. The major challenge remains that of primary prevention, that is, how to prevent SCD during the first 1–3 months after ST-elevation MI for patients who have low left ventricular ejection fraction and are not candidates for an ICD according to current guidelines, due to the results of two studies, which did not show any benefits of early (<40 days after an MI) ICD implantation. Two recent documents may provide direction as to how to bridge the gap for this early post-MI period. Both recommend an electrophysiology study to guide implantation of an ICD, at least for those developing syncope or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, who have an inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia at the electrophysiology study. An ICD is also recommended for patients with indication for a permanent pacemaker due to bradyarrhythmias, who also meet primary prevention criteria for SCD.     

Cardiac troponin I: its contribution to the diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction and various complications of cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE: To study the value of assaying cardiac troponin I (cTnI) for the early diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) and various complications of cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A prospective observational clinical study. SETTING: Biochemical laboratory, anesthesia, and cardiac surgery department of H?pital Broussais. PATIENTS: Two hundred and sixty consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valvular surgery under extracorporeal circulation. Per-operative and postoperative follow-up consisted of electrocardiogram, echocardiography (mainly by the transesophageal approach), and serial determinations of biochemical markers such as creatinine kinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) and cTnI. PMI, new ST segment changes, and ventricular arrhythmias were considered postoperative adverse cardiac outcome. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CTnI was measured before cardiopulmonary bypass (T0) and 12 and 24 hrs after (T12, T24). CK-MB was measured on arrival in the intensive care unit and on the first postoperative day (D1). Patients were divided into three groups according to the type of surgery: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), valvular surgery (VS), or both procedures. The plasma CK-MB and cTnI concentrations were high in all patients after extracorporeal circulation because of aortic clamping or cardioplegia. The CK-MB and cTnI values were higher in the VS group than in the CABG group. Values peaked at T12 and fell by T24, except when PMI occurred. Eight patients developed a PMI. Patients with PMI had significantly higher cTnI levels at T12 and T24, and higher CK-MB values at D1 than patients without PMI. Cutoff values of cTnI for diagnosing PMI were >19 microg/L at T12 with 100% sensitivity and 73% specificity, and >36 microg/L at T24, with 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Lower cTnI values were highly suggestive of the absence of PMI after CABG and/or VS. Other complications such as ST segment changes, ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac failure were indicated by high cTnI levels at T12 and T24. Myocardial protective measures were associated with a nonsignificant increase in cTnI values. CONCLUSIONS: CTnI is more sensitive and specific than CK-MB for diagnosing PMI and other forms of heart failure after cardiac surgery.     

Underutilization of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Systolic Dysfunction

Background: Evaluation of the need for prophylactic internal cardiac defibrillators among patients with ischemic cardiomyopathies should be deferred until at least 3 months after revascularization procedures to allow adequate time for recovery of ventricular function. Methods: Among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the proportion of patients who are risk stratified postoperatively with reassessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unknown. Results: One hundred and six patients with LVSD (LVEF < 40%) who underwent CABG during 2004–2006 and survived 3 months post CABG were evaluated. Follow‐up was assessed by chart review and telephone contact. LVEF was not reassessed in 24% (25/106) of the population, none of whom underwent internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Of those with LVEF reassessed, persistent LVSD was present in 20/81 (25%), 12 of whom were referred for prophylactic ICD placement. Conclusion: One‐fourth of patients with LVSD who undergo CABG do not have LVEF reassessed postoperatively which may lead to underutilization of ICDs. (PACE 2010; 33:727–733)     

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias and Ischemic Heart Disease

In patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and myocardial ischemia due to multivessel coronary artery disease, it remains unclear whether revascularization is enough to control the arrhythmias or whether additional implantation of a defibrillator is indicated. We therefore reviewed our clinical strategy of performing both bypass surgery and implantation of a defibrillator in patients with syncopal ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation and significant multivessel coronary artery disease. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 18 patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias, significant multivessel coronary artery disease, and signs of myocardial ischemia who underwent both bypass surgery and defibrillator implantation. Data on these patients were compared to data from 232 other defibrillator patients with respect to baseline clinical variables, cardiac events, and mortality during follow-up. Except for underlying pathology, no other important differences in baseline characteristics were noted between the study patients and the other defibrillator patients. The cumulative occurrence of shocks during follow-up was comparable in both groups (66% vs 67%). The cumulative survival from all-cause mortality was 94% in the study patients and 78% in the others (P = NS). Pre- and postoperative electrophysiological testing was not useful to predict arrhythmia recurrences. In this population of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and ischemia due to multivessel coronary artery disease, bypass surgery alone would not have prevented recurrences of arrhythmias. An excellent survival and a high incidence of shocks after both bypass surgery and defibrillator implantation were observed.