动脉持续灌注化疗与静脉全身化疗治疗中晚期胰腺癌的疗效分析

Objective: To compare the curative effectiveness of continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy and systemic venous chemotherapy in treating patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, and to evaluate the value of selective continu-ous transarterial infusion chemotherapy in treating advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Of the 51 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil, 25 patients were treated with selective con-tinuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy, 26 were treated with systemic venous chemotherapy, and curative effective-ness was analyzed retrospectively. Curative effectiveness included tumor volume, clinical benefit response (CBR), acute and subacute toxic reactions of antitumor drugs, survival rate and median survival time. Results: The objective effective rate in transarterial group was 32.0% versus 23.1% in systemic group without any significant difference (P = 0.475). Clinical benefit rates in transarterial group and systemic group were 80.0% and 50.0% respectively (P = 0.025). The 6-, 9-and 12-month accumulated survival rates and median survival time in transarterial group were higher than those of the systemic group (P = 0.002), the differences were statistically significant. However, the adverse reactions between the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Compared with systemic chemotherapy, continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil could improve clinical benefit rate and survival time of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, it is safe and reliable, and the adverse reactions is less.     

经动脉灌注健择化疗联合三维适形放射治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的临床研究

Objective： To evaluate the clinical effect of transarterial infusion chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus three dimensional conformal radiotherapy on patients with local advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods： Fifty-one patients with local advanced pancreatic cancer from June 2002 to February 2004 were enrolled, twenty-four patients of combined group were treated with transarterial infusion chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus three dimensional conformal radiotherapy, while twenty-seven patients of control group were treated only with transarterial infusion chemotherapy of gemcitabine. Results： There were significant statistical differences between two groups in clinical benefit response （91.7% versus 74.1%, P 〈 0.01） and overall remission rate （70.8% versus 33.3%, P 〈 0.01）. The 6-month survival rate, 12-month survival rate and 24-month survival rate of combined group were 83.3%, 62.5% and 37.5% respectively, while that of control group were 55.6%, 33.3% and 11.1% respectively. This showed significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion： Transarterial infusion chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus three dimensional conformal radiotherapy may be better than single transarterial infusion chemotherapy of gemcitabine in improving survival rates and elongating survival time of patients with local advanced pancreatic cancer.     

HCPT联合L-OHP方案治疗进展期结直肠癌的近期临床疗效

Objective： Although 5-fluarouracil-based chemotherapy has become a standard regimen for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, the efficacy, as second line therapy, is not high. It is necessary to find a new regimen as a substitute for these patients. The study was to evaluate the short-time effects and toxicity of combination of HCPT plus L-OHP regimen in treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Methods： Forty-seven patients with pathological evidence of advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled and were treated with HCPT plus L-OHP regimen for 86 cycles. All patients were treated with L-OHP 130 mg/m^2 day 1 and HCPT 6 mg/m^2day 1-4, the chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks as a cycle. The Short-time efficats and side effects were evaluated after 2 cycles for each patient. Results： 38 cases can be evaluated to short-time effects and achieved the overall response rate （CR＋PR） was 36.8%. KPS improved in 20 cases （52.6%）. In the total 86 cycles, the leucopenia occurred in 59 cycles （68.6%）,18 cycles （30.5%） in grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ and the diarrhea occurred in 48 cycles （55.8%）, 18 cycles （37.5%） in grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ. Conclusion： A satisfied response rate was obtained in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated by HCPT plus L-OHP regimen, especially who were the failure of first-line chemotherapy with 5-FU. The limited-dose toxicity was leucopenia and diarrhea.     

Intraarterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced or recurrent penile squamous cell carcinoma

The prognosis of locally advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma （SCC） of the penis after conventional treatment is dismal. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of intraarterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin on locally advanced or recurrent SCC of the penis. Between April 1999 and May 2011, we treated 5 patients with locally advanced penile SCC and 7 patients with recurrent disease with intraarterial chemotherapy. The response rate and toxicity data were analyzed, and survival rates were calculated. After 2 to 6 cycles of intraarterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin, 1 patients with Iocoregionally advanced disease achieved a complete response, and 4 achieved partial response. Of the 7 patients with recurrent disease, 2 achieved complete response, 3 achieved partial response, 3 had stable disease, and 1 developed progressive disease. An objective tumor response was therefore achieved in 10 of the 12 patients. The median overall survival for the patients was 24 months （range, 10-50 months）. Three out of 10 patients who responded were long-term survivors after intraarterial chemotherapy. Intraarterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin may be effective and potentially curative in Iocoregionally advanced or recurrent penile SCC. The contribution of this therapy in the primary management of advanced or recurrent penile SCC shouJd be prospectively investigated.     

周剂量紫杉醇联合替吉奥治疗晚期胃癌(英文)

Objective:There remains no standard first-line chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination regimen with weekly paclitaxel and S-1 as a first-line chemotherapy for AGC. Methods:Forty-six patients with AGC were included in this study. Paclitaxel was administered weekly at a dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, S-1 was administered orally twice daily at 80 mg/m2/day for 2 weeks. The regimen was repeated every four weeks. Results:The results showed that the overall response rate was 45.7%, with 3 patients achieved complete response and 18 patients had a partial response, the disease control rate was 76.1%. The median progress free survival was 7.2 months 95% confidence interval (CI):6.3-8.1 months and the median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI:10.6-12.6 months) after treatment with paclitaxel and S-1. Neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (54.3%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 8 patients (17.4%), gastrointestinal reactions were the most common non-hematologic toxicities, while severe gastrointestinal toxicities were uncommon. Conclusion:The regimen of weekly paclitaxel and S-1 demonstrated activity and acceptable toxicity for AGC as a first-line chemotherapy.     

CLINICAL EFFICACY OF VINORELBINE PLUS CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

A clinical study of the efficacy of vinorelbine plus cisplatin regimen in the management of advanced NSCLC was performed in 35 patients. Five of the 35 patients failed to finish one cycle of chemotherapy with this regimen because of severe and intractable leukopenia or rapid progress of the disease. Tumor response and toxicity were evaluated in the remaining 30 cases. Results showed that, with this regimen, the objective response rate (CR PR) was 46.7%. The most common toxicity was leukopenia; other side effects included alopecia, gastrointestinal reactions, slight and transient renal and hepatic impairment and peripheral neuropathy. It suggested that vinorelbine plus cisplatin is a safe and effective regimen in the management of advanced NSCLC.     

EPOCH方案治疗老年人外周T细胞淋巴瘤的临床研究

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of EPOCH regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Methods Twenty-eight elderly patients with pathologically diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma were treated with EPOCH regimen, including 96-hour continuous infusion of etoposide 50 mg/m2, epirubincin 12 mg/m2 and vincristin 0.4 mg/m2 on daysl through 4,cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 given as intravenous bolus on day 5 and prednisone 60 mg/m2 administered orally on daysl through 5. The EPOCH regimen was repeated very 21 days. Clinical efficacy and safety profiles of EPOCH regimen was systemically reviewed and analysed. Results All the 28 patients received a total of 85 cycles of EPOCH regimen. The median cycles was two courses. Fifteen patients achieved complete response, while five cases obtaining partial response. The overall response rate was 71.4 %. The median survival time was 20 months. In newly diagnosed patients, complete response rate (CR) as well as partial response (PR) and overall response rate (OR) reached 64.7 %, 23.5 % and 88.2 %, respectively, which was significantly higher than that in refractory cases, whose CR, PR and OR were 36.4 %, 9.1% and 45.5 %(λ 2 = 5.99, P ＜0.05). In addition, the median survivalduration of newly diagnosed patients was longer than that of refractory cases, whose median survival time was 24 and 13 months, respectively. The major adverse events was myelosuppression with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 53.6 % and 50.0 % cases.Non-hematologic toxicities were moderate and uncommon. The frequency of adverse effects in de novo patients showed little difference in comparison with that in refractory ones (P＞0.05). Conclusion EPOCH regimen was an effective and well tolerated therapeutic schedule for elderly patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.     

EPOCH方案治疗老年人外周T细胞淋巴瘤的临床研究

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of EPOCH regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Methods Twenty-eight elderly patients with pathologically diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma were treated with EPOCH regimen, including 96-hour continuous infusion of etoposide 50 mg/m2, epirubincin 12 mg/m2 and vincristin 0.4 mg/m2 on daysl through 4,cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 given as intravenous bolus on day 5 and prednisone 60 mg/m2 administered orally on daysl through 5. The EPOCH regimen was repeated very 21 days. Clinical efficacy and safety profiles of EPOCH regimen was systemically reviewed and analysed. Results All the 28 patients received a total of 85 cycles of EPOCH regimen. The median cycles was two courses. Fifteen patients achieved complete response, while five cases obtaining partial response. The overall response rate was 71.4 %. The median survival time was 20 months. In newly diagnosed patients, complete response rate (CR) as well as partial response (PR) and overall response rate (OR) reached 64.7 %, 23.5 % and 88.2 %, respectively, which was significantly higher than that in refractory cases, whose CR, PR and OR were 36.4 %, 9.1% and 45.5 %(λ 2 = 5.99, P ＜0.05). In addition, the median survivalduration of newly diagnosed patients was longer than that of refractory cases, whose median survival time was 24 and 13 months, respectively. The major adverse events was myelosuppression with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 53.6 % and 50.0 % cases.Non-hematologic toxicities were moderate and uncommon. The frequency of adverse effects in de novo patients showed little difference in comparison with that in refractory ones (P＞0.05). Conclusion EPOCH regimen was an effective and well tolerated therapeutic schedule for elderly patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.     

The clinical observation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer with DX regimen

The recent clinical curative effect and adverse events of docetaxel and capecitabine （DX） of neo- adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer was discussed. Methods： The data of 72 cases of neoadjuvant chemotherapy （DX） in locally advanced breast cancer after 4 cycles were retrospectively analyzed. Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 by infusion 1 h on dl, capecitabine 2000 mg/m^2 by oral for twice daily on d1-14, 21 days was a cycle. Results： All 72 patients were assessed for efficacy and adverse events. The total effective rate was 80.5% （58/72）, including pathological complete response （pCR） was 7 （9.7%）, clinical complete remission （cCR） was 15（20.8%）, clinical partial response （PR） was 43 （59.7%）, stable disease （SD） was 8 （11.1%） and progressive disease （PD） was 6 （8.3%）. The main adverse events were gastrointestinal reactions and bone marrow suppression. The 3 to 4 degrees of adverse reactions including granulocytopenia in 7 patients （20.6%）, hand-foot syndrome in 6 patients （15.2%）. Conclusion： The DX regimen provide a favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with locally advanced breast cancer for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

Efficacy and safety evaluation of icotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of icotinib hydrochloride in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A total of 89 patients with stage ⅢB or IV NSCLC received icotinib at a dose of 125 mg administered 3 times a day. Icotinib treatment was continued until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Results: A total of 89 patients were assessable. In patients treated with icotinib, the overall response rate (RR) was 36.0% (32/89), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.7% (62/89). RR and DCR were significantly improved in patients with adenocarcinoma versus non-adenocarcinoma (P<0.05). The symptom improvement rate was 57.3% (51/89), and the main symptoms improved were cough, pain, chest distress, dyspnea, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The main toxic effects were rash [30/89 (33.7%)] and diarrhea [15/89 (16.9%)]. The level of toxicity was typically low. Conclusions: The use of icotinib hydrochloride in the treatment of advanced NSCLC is efficacious and safe, and its toxic effects are tolerable.     

吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胰腺癌的临床观察

为观察吉西他滨（GEM）联合奥沙利铂（OXA）治疗晚期胰腺癌的有效性和安全性。对30例晚期胰腺癌患者,应用GEM1000mg/m2,静脉滴入30min,d1、d8;OXA100mg/m2,静脉滴入2h,d1,21d重复。至少接受2个周期的化疗。结果30例均可评价疗效,客观有效率20.00%,临床受益疗效分别为疼痛缓解率53.33%（16/30）,行为状态改善率45.33%（13/30）,体质量状态改善率36.33%（10/30）。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、外周神经毒性及胃肠道反应,无治疗相关性死亡。初步研究结果显示,GEM联合OXA组成的GEMOX方案治疗晚期胰腺癌近期有效率较高,毒性较低,值得临床推广应用。     

吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胰腺癌

目的:观察吉西他滨(GEM)联合奥沙利铂(OXA)组成的GEMOX方案治疗国人晚期胰腺癌的有效性和安全性。方法:晚期胰腺癌22例,应用GEM1000mg/m2静滴30min,d1,d8;OXA100mg/m2静滴2h,d1,d8,21天重复。至少接受2个周期的化疗,按照WHO标准进行评价。结果:22例均可评价疗效,客观有效率18·18%,临床受益疗效分别为疼痛缓解率54·55%,行为状态改善率45·45%,体重状态改善率36·33%。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、外周神经毒性及胃肠道反应,无治疗相关性死亡。结论:吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂组成的GEMOX方案治疗国人晚期胰腺癌近期有效率较高,毒性较低,值得临床推广应用。     

吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胰腺癌患者的疗效

背景与目的:吉西他滨是目前治疗晚期胰腺癌的最有效的药物之一,初步的研究显示,与奥沙利铂联合(GEMOX)的疗效优于吉西他滨单药,但国内使用GEMOX方案治疗胰腺癌的研究报道并不多.本研究目的是观察GEMOX方案治疗晚期胰腺癌患者的有效率、生存期和毒副反应,为临床治疗提供指导.方法:本研究为单中心、回顾性临床分析.选择32例未接受过化疗的初治Ⅲ～Ⅳ期胰腺癌患者,所有患者均至少接受2个周期的GEMOX方案(吉西他滨1000 mg/m2,静脉滴入,d1、d8;奥沙利铂85～130 mg/m2,静脉滴入,d1;每21 d重复)化疗.结果:28例患者可评价疗效,8例部分缓解(partial remission,PR),8例病情稳定(stable disease,SD),12例病情进展(progressive disease,PD),4例不能评估(not assessable,NA),总有效率为25.0%,临床获益率46.9%(15例),中位无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)为4.7个月,中位生存期8.6个月,1年生存率为32.6%.骨髓抑制的总发生率为70.9%,其中Ⅲ、Ⅳ度的发生率为32.3%(白细胞下降的发生率为19.4%,血红蛋白下降的发生率为12.9%,血小板下降的发生率为22.6%).恶心、呕吐和腹泻的发生率为56.2%,其中Ⅲ度呕吐2例.肝功能异常的总发生率为25.0%,全部为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度.外周神经毒性发生率为43.8%,全部为Ⅰ度.无化疗相关的死亡.结论:GEMOX方案是治疗晚期胰腺癌的有效方案,总体临床耐受性良好,其主要的不良反应为骨髓抑制.     

健择联合奥沙利铂双周方案治疗胰腺癌作用探讨

目的：比较健择联合奥沙利铂双周化疗方案和健择单药每周方案治疗胰腺癌的疗效及不良反应方法：选择我科2003年11月至2005年1月胰腺癌患者30例．采用健择联合奥沙利铂双周化疗方案（设为A组：健择1000mg／m^2d1，奥沙利铂100mg／m^2d2，每隔14天进行1个周期）进行治疗；随机选择同时期使用健择单药方案（设为B组：健择1000mg／m^2单药，每周1次，连续3周，随后休息1周为1个周期）化疗的胰腺癌患者30例做对照,比较两方案治疗胰腺癌的疗效和不良反应的差异。结果：A组PR3例，SD21例，PD6例，1年生存率为16.7％（5／30）B组PR1例，SD14例，PD15例，1年生存率为10.0％（3／30）。化疗的主要不良反应包括：恶心、呕吐，骨髓抑制和外周神经毒性。结论：健择加奥沙利铂双周化疗方案在抑制肿瘤发展、延长生存期方面略优于传统健择单药方案，而两者不良反应大体相当，推荐临床使用。     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II study

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) are active as first-line therapy against advanced pancreatic cancer. This study aims to evaluate the activity and tolerability of this combination in patients refractory to standard gemcitabine (GEM). A total of 33 patients (median age of 57) were included with locally advanced and metastatic evaluable diseases, who had progressed during or following GEM therapy. The GEMOX regimen consisted of 1000 mg m(-2) of GEM at a 100-min infusion on day 1, followed on day 2 by 100 mg m(-2) of oxaliplatin at a 2-h infusion; a cycle that was given every 2 weeks. All patients received at least one cycle of GEMOX (median 5; range 1-29). Response by 31 evaluable patients was as follows: PR: 7/31(22.6%), s.d. > or = 8 weeks: 11/31(35.5%), s.d. < 8 weeks: 1/31(3.2%), PD: 12/31(38.7%). Median duration of response and TTP were 4.5 and 4.2 months, respectively. Median survival was 6 months (range 0.5-21). Clinical benefit response was observed in 17/31 patients (54.8%). Grade III/IV non-neurologic toxicities occurred in 12/33 patients (36.3%), and grade I, II, and III neuropathy in 17(51%), 3(9%), and 4(12%) patients, respectively. GEMOX is a well-tolerated, active regimen that may provide a benefit to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after progression following standard gemcitabine treatment.     

GEMOX对比GX方案一线治疗晚期转移性胆系肿瘤的临床观察

目的观察吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂方案（GEMOX组）或希罗达（GX组）方案一线治疗晚期转移性胆系肿瘤（BTCs）的有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析经病理及影像学检查确诊为原发性胆系肿瘤Ⅳ期的61例患者。其中,GEMOX方案为一线治疗的31例,GX方案为一线治疗的30例。GEMOX组：吉西他滨1 000 mg/m2静脉滴注d1、8,奥沙利铂 100 mg/m²静脉滴注d2。GX组：吉西他滨1 000 mg/m2静脉滴注d1、8;希罗达片1 250 mg/ m² ,口服 2次/日 d1~14。两方案均21天为一周期。至少完成2周期化疗的患者进行疗效、不良反应评价,并分析生存情况。结果GEMOX组完全缓解（CR）2例、部分缓解（PR）6例、稳定（SD）15例,有效率（RR）为25.8％,疾病控制率（DCR）74.2%,中位疾病进展时间（mTTP）6.5月,中位总生存期（mOS）12月;GX方案组CR 1例、PR 5例、SD 16例,RR 20.0％,DCR 73.3%,mTTP为 6月,mOS 为10月。两组的RR、DCR、mTTP、mOS差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。两组Ⅲ度白细胞减少分别为6.5% vs. 6.7%,Ⅲ度血小板减少分别为6.5% vs. 3.3%,两组比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。而外周神经炎以GEMOX组显著,手足综合征仅见于GX组。结论GEMOX和GX方案均可作为一线治疗晚期转移性BTCs的推荐方案,两组不良反应均较轻,耐受性好,具体实施应根据患者个体耐受情况及药物毒性进行选择。     

Continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-Fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Purpose: Pancreatic carcinoma is one of the most malignant tumors of the alimentary system, with relativelyhigh incidence rates. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of two regimens for advancedpancreatic carcinoma: continuous transarterial infusion versus systemic venous chemotherapy with gemcitabineand 5-fluorouracil. Methods: Of the 48 patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma receiving chemotherapy withgemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil, 24 received the selective transarterial infusion, and 24 the systemic chemotherapy.For the continuous transarterial infusion group (experimental group), all patients received gemcitabine 1000mg/m2,given by 30-minute transarterial infusion, on day 1 of a 4-week cycle for 2 cycles, and a dose of 600 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil was infused on days 1~5 of a 4-week cycle for 2 cycles. For the systemic venous group (controlgroup), gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil were infused through a peripheral vein, a dose of 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabinebeing administrated over 30 min on days 1 and 8 of a 4-week cycle for 2 cycles, and a dose of 600 mg/m25-fluorouracil was infused on days 1~5 of a 4-week cycle for 2 cycles. The effectiveness and safety were evaluatedafter 2 cyclesaccording to WHO criteria. Results:The objective effective rate in transarterial group was 33.3%versus 25% in the systemic group, the difference not being significant (P=0.626). Clinical benefit rates(CBR) inthe transarterial and systemic groups were 83.3% and 58.3%, respectively (P=0.014). The means and mediansfor survival time in transarterial group were higher than those of the systemic group (P < 0.005). at the sametime, the adverse effects did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Continuoustransarterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil could improve clinical benefit rate andsurvival time of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma, compared with systemic venous chemotherapy.Since adverse effects were limited in the transarterial group, the regimen of continuous transarterial infusionchemotherapy can be used more extensively in clinical practice. A CT and MRI conventional sequence can beused for efficacy evaluation after chemotherapy in pancreatic carcinoma.     

沙利度胺联合GEMOX方案治疗中晚期肝癌的临床观察

目的观察沙利度胺联合吉西他滨及奥沙利铂（GEMOX方案）治疗原发性肝癌的有效性和安全性。方法对15例中晚期肝癌患者行沙利度胺（400 mg/天）,吉西他滨（1 000 mg/m2,第1,8天）及奥沙利铂（130 mg/m2,第1天）方案联合化疗2,1天为1个周期。以RECIST标准评价疗效,以NCI标准评价不良反应。结果 15例患者均可评价客观疗效及不良反应。其总有效率（RR）为40.0%（6/15）,疾病控制率（DCR）为73.3%（11/15）。中位疾病进展时间（TTP）5.5个月。治疗后KPS评分明显改善。结论沙利度胺联合吉西他滨及奥沙利铂治疗原发性肝癌安全有效,耐受性良好。     

晚期胰腺癌常用一线化疗方案真实世界临床疗效观察

目的:比较白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨(AG)、白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合替吉奥(AS)、吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂(GEMOX)、吉西他滨联合替吉奥(GS)方案在真实世界一线治疗晚期胰腺癌的有效性及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2021年6月于我院诊治的165例晚期胰腺癌患者的病例资料,根据化疗方案不同分为四组：AG组(n=40)、AS组(n=31)、GEMOX组(n=31)、GS组(n=63),按照实体肿瘤临床疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1版本评估临床疗效和常见不良事件评价标准(CTCAE)5.0版本评估患者的不良反应,主要研究终点为总生存期(overall survival, OS)和无进展生存期(progression-free survival, PFS),次要研究终点为客观缓解率(objective response rate, ORR)和疾病控制率(disease control rate, DCR)以及治疗相关不良反应,采用Cox风险比例模型分析影响患者预后的因素。结果:165例患者的中位OS时间为10.5个月,中位PFS时间为6.0个月,AG、AS、GEMOX、...     

动脉灌注结合全身静脉化疗治疗中晚期胰腺癌的临床观察

目的:观察动脉灌注结合全身静脉化疗治疗中晚期胰腺癌的疗效。方法:对12例中晚期胰腺癌患者选择性给予腹腔干动脉和/或肠系膜上动脉灌注吉西他滨和5-氟尿嘧啶,第8天再给予吉西他滨全身静脉化疗。3周为1个治疗周期,完成两个周期后复查CT评价疗效,观察临床受益反应、有效率、生存期及毒副反应。结果:全组患者临床受益率66.7%,有效率(CR PR)16.7%,中位生存时间6.7个月,6个月及9个月累积生存率分别为59.4%、29.6%。毒副反应多为Ⅰ°～Ⅱ°均能耐受。结论:动脉灌注结合全身静脉化疗治疗中晚期胰腺癌可获得较好的疗效,提高生存质量,毒副反应较小,值得临床推广应用。