Salvage pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy

Historically, total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy has been the standard radical surgical treatment for synchronous cancer of the thoracoabdominal esophagus and pharyngolaryngeal region, and for cancer of the cervical esophagus that has invaded as far as the thoracic esophagus. Although definitive chemoradiotherapy that enables preservation of the larynx has often been the first choice of treatment for cancers involving the cervical esophagus, total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is required as a salvage therapy for cases involving failure of complete remission or locoregional recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. However, salvage esophageal surgery after definitive high‐dose chemoradiotherapy is generally associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine the short‐term outcome of salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy. From 2001 to 2014, nine patients underwent salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University. The mortality and morbidity rates were high at 22% and 89%, respectively. Four patients (44%) developed tracheal necrosis, which in two patients eventually led to lethal hemorrhage. Salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is an uncommon and highly demanding surgical procedure that should be carefully planned and conducted in selected centers of excellence. Measures must be taken to preserve the tracheal blood supply, thus avoiding fatal complications.     

Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Salvage esophagectomy is performed for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy. The clinical significance and safety of salvage surgery has not been well established. We reviewed 14 cases of salvage esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy from 1994 through 2005 and investigated complication rates and outcomes. Seven of 14 cases were completely resected with salvage surgery. Operation time and bleeding were greater in patients who experienced incomplete resection (R1/R2). Anastomosis leakage, pulmonary dysfunction and heart failure were recognized in four, two and one patients, respectively. The postoperative complications were more frequent (71.4%) in patients with incomplete resection (R1/R2) than in patients with complete resection (R0) (28.4%). Two patients with complete resection (R0) showed long-term survival. Salvage esophagectomy may be indicated when the tumor can be resected completely after definitive chemotherapy. However, all cases of T4 cancer cannot be resected completely, resulting in a high risk for complications and poor survival.     

Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and head-and-neck

Head-and-neck cancer is frequently associated with esophageal cancer. Because the operative procedures for these synchronous double cancers are too invasive, definitive chemoradiotherapy tends to be applied as an initial treatment. A salvage esophagectomy for either recurrent or residual disease after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with such double cancer has never been reported. We reviewed 21 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Among them, the treatment course of five patients who underwent a salvage esophagectomy for patients with synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and head-and-neck region was analyzed. Because head-and-neck cancer was well controlled after chemoradiotherapy in all five patients, a salvage esophagectomy was indicated for either recurrent or residual esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Anastomotic leakage developed in four patients; however, no other complications including pulmonary complications were recognized. All of them were discharged to home and three of them are still alive without any recurrence for 20–43 months. A salvage esophagectomy should be considered as a treatment option for either recurrent or residual esophageal cancer with well-controlled head-and-neck cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy when complete resection of the esophagus is expected.     

Outcomes from salvage esophagectomy post definitive chemoradiotherapy compared with resection following preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as a definitive treatment for esophageal cancer, is being used with increasing frequency and as a result, surgeons will be required to assess more patients who have residual or recurrent local malignancy. This article aimed to assess outcomes after esophagectomy following definitive CRT (dCRT) and compare any difference between them and patients who had preoperative neoadjuvant CRT (nCRT) using a similar regimen of chemotherapy. From a prospective database the details of patients who had a resection following nCRT and dCRT were analyzed. The main therapeutic difference between the groups was the dose of radiotherapy (35 vs 60 Gy) and the timing of the resection following completion of the CRT (median 4 vs 28 weeks). Fourteen patients had an esophagectomy following a dCRT and 53 had one following a nCRT. Preoperatively, the dCRT group had worse respiratory function and more ECG abnormalities. Preoperative tumor length, pathological TNM staging and R0 resection rates were the same in both groups. Post resection, the dCRT group had greater morbidity than the nCRT group, spending longer in the intensive care unit (median 48 vs 24 h), more days in hospital (median 31 vs 13) and having more severe respiratory complications (37%vs 6%). The operative mortality was higher in the dCRT group (7%vs 0%). The three-year survival was 24% after dCRT. Patients selected for salvage esophagectomy following dCRT are a major challenge in postoperative care. However, some patients survive for a reasonable period of time, making resection a worthwhile option.     

Systematic review and meta‐analysis on the significance of salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy

The therapeutic strategy to be recommended in case of recurrent or persistent squamous cell esophageal cancer after completed definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has to be documented. Salvage esophagectomy has traditionally been recognized as a viable option, but many clinicians oppose the use of surgery due to the associated excessive morbidity and mortality. ‘Second‐line’ chemoradiotherapy (CRT) without surgery may offer a treatment alternative in these difficult and demanding clinical situations. Until now, no comprehensive attempt has been carried out to compare the respective therapeutic options. A systematic literature search was performed focusing on studies comparing survival and treatment‐related mortality in patients submitted to salvage esophagectomy or second‐line CRT for recurrent or persistent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after dCRT. Hazard ratios and risk ratios were calculated to compare the effect of these therapeutic strategies on overall survival and treatment‐related mortality, respectively. Four studies containing 219 patients, with persistent or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after dCRT, were included in the meta‐analysis. The analysis revealed an overall survival benefit following salvage esophagectomy with a pooled hazard ratio for death of 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.21–0.86, P = 0.017) compared with second‐line CRT. A treatment‐related mortality of 10.3% was recorded in the 36 patients who were submitted to salvage esophagectomy, while it was impossible to perform a meta‐analysis comparing treatment‐related mortality between the groups. Salvage esophagectomy offers significant gain in long‐term survival compared with second‐line CRT, although the surgery is potentially at a price of a high treatment‐related mortality.     

Salvage or planned esophagectomy after chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer – a review

Definitive chemoradiation (without esophagectomy) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by planned esophagectomy are commonly used treatments for locally advanced esophageal cancer. These two treatment strategies have similar survival outcomes, so the value of planned esophagectomy is debated. However, persistence or recurrence of local disease is not uncommon after definitive chemoradiation. Salvage esophagectomy for isolated local failures of definitive chemoradiation is an option for selected patients. In this article we review the debate over definitive chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery, and then restate the argument in terms of salvage versus planned esophagectomy. Although both forms of esophagectomy are done in the setting of previous chemoradiation, they are different in several ways. Salvage esophagectomy appears to be a more morbid operation than planned esophagectomy. Surgeons supportive of the salvage esophagectomy strategy face the challenge of reducing its postoperative mortality.     

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy for initially resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with multiple lymph node metastasis

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was expected to improve surgical curability and prognosis for advanced esophageal cancer. However, the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy (3FL) for initially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains unclear. Since 1998, we have defined the status of metastases to five or more nodes, or nodal metastases present in all three fields as multiple lymph node metastasis, which was previously shown to be associated with poor prognosis. Between 1998 and 2002, 83 patients with initially resectable esophageal SCC were prospectively allocated into two groups, according to the clinical status of nodal metastasis. Nineteen patients clinically accompanied by multiple lymph node metastasis initially underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by curative esophagectomy with 3FL (CRT group). The other 64 patients clinically without multiple lymph node metastasis immediately received curative esophagectomy with 3FL (control group). Although the overall morbidity rate was significantly higher in the CRT group, no in-hospital death occurred in either group. Patients without pathologic multiple lymph node metastasis in the CRT group showed a significantly better disease-free survival rate than either patients pathologically with multiple lymph node metastasis in the control group or those in the CRT group. However, the differences in the overall survival rate among the groups were not significant. Thus, the significant survival benefit by neoadjuvant CRT in addition to esophagectomy with 3FL was not confirmed, although it may have been advantageous, without increase in mortality, to at least some patients who responded well to neoadjuvant CRT. Therefore, neoadjuvant CRT can be an initial treatment of choice for resectable esophageal SCC clinically with multiple lymph node metastasis. The prediction of response to CRT and the development of alternative treatment for hematogenous recurrence could achieve a further survival benefit of this trimodality treatment.     

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy in resectable stage II/III (T1-3N0, 1M0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background There are two intensive modalities for the treatment of resectable esophageal carcinoma: esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Esophagectomy with preoperative CRT was retrospectively compared with CRT alone in resectable stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Seventy-four patients with resectable stage II/III (T1-3N0, 1M0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were treated with preoperative CRT by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 700 mg/m² on days 1 to 5, nedaplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1, and concurrent radiation for a total of 30 Gy in 3 weeks. If patients decided to undergo surgery, esophagectomy from the thoracoabdominal approach was carried out 6 weeks after the completion of CRT (CRT + Surg group, n = 51). If patients decided not to undergo surgery, they were treated with one more course of CRT (CRT-alone group, n = 23). Results There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.1006), whereas the disease-free survival in the CRT + Surg group was improved compared with the CRT-alone group (P = 0.0186). In the patients with clinical stage III carcinoma or with regional lymph node metastasis, the overall survival rate was significantly improved in the CRT + Surg group compared with the CRT-alone group. The rate of local failures in the CRT + Surg group was significantly lower compared with the CRT-alone group (P = 0.0011). Conclusions Preoperative CRT followed by esophagectomy provides better local control, but does not prolong overall survival, compared with definitive CRT. However, in clinical stage III or N1, esophagectomy with preoperative CRT could contribute to the improvement of survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.     

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) after minimally invasive and open esophagectomy

Esophagectomy for esophageal malignancies remains an operation with significant potential morbidity and mortality. However, surgical outcomes continue to improve over time and focus has shifted toward not just good outcomes, but quality of life post operatively. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) focus of quality of life measures via validated patient surveys has increasingly become a significant focus. While PROs do have their limitations, they represent a glimpse into the symptomatology, quality of life, and well-being of a patient undergoing a procedure with inherent morbidity. Working to improve outcomes from the perspective of the patient is not a new concept, but has becoming increasingly relevant as surgical quality for all procedures improves. The optimal approach to esophagectomy is controversial. Minimally invasive approaches attempt to avoid laparotomy and thoracotomy with the thought of improving post-operative quality of life by mitigating complications related to those open surgical approaches. The data in favor of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy is quite strong and multiple randomized controlled trials exist in this realm supporting minimally invasive approaches with regards to quality of life outcomes and more rapid return to patient’s preoperative baseline. The data in favor of a robotic approach for esophagectomy is not quite as robust, but more studies show that these approaches mirror the benefits of the laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches without robotic assistance.     

Salvage lymphadenectomy for cervical lymph node recurrence after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

Prognosis of patients with recurrent esophageal cancer is usually unsatisfactory. We have successfully treated five patients with cervical node recurrence after esophagectomy with multimodal treatment including salvage lymphadenectomy. In order to clarify the efficacy of salvage surgery for cervical node recurrence, we have reviewed the clinical course and prognosis of these patients. From August 2004 to December 2007, 30 patients with 33 recurrent sites were treated in the Department of Surgery, Iizuka Hospital. Among these patients, there were five patients with recurrence limited within the cervical nodes. Salvage cervical lymphadenectomy was performed for all five patients. Curative resection was achieved in four patients and reduction surgery followed by planned chemoradiotherapy was performed in another patient. All stations including the suspicious node were dissected and a partial sternotomy was added for one patient whose recurrent tumor was located in the right recurrent nerve node. There was no mortality and one minor complication (subcutaneous hemorrhage) was observed. Median duration of hospital stay was 7 days. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed for all patients. Median follow‐up period was 54 months and all patients are alive without relapse of the disease. Salvage cervical lymphadenectomy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with cervical node recurrence after esophagectomy.     

Columnar metaplasia in the esophageal remnant after esophagectomy: a systematic review

Barrett's metaplasia is a well‐recognized risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. It is believed to develop in response to the injurious effects of gastroesophageal reflux. Following subtotal esophagectomy and reconstruction with a gastric conduit, many patients experience profound reflux into the remnant esophagus. Barrett's‐like epithelium has been described in these patients, and they have been identified as a potential human model in which to study the early events in the development of metaplasia. This phenomenon also raises clinical concerns about the long‐term fate of the esophageal remnant following surgery and the potential for further malignant change. This systematic review summarizes the literature on the prevalence and timing of Barrett's metaplasia occurring after esophagectomy, reviews the evidence regarding risk factors and malignant progression in such patients, and considers the implications for clinical practice.     

Adenocarcinoma developing in de novo Barrett's mucosa in the remnant esophagus after esophagectomy: clinical and molecular assessment

SUMMARY.  For many patients after subtotal esophagectomy and gastric pull-up, reflux of gastric contents to the esophageal stump is the leading clinical problem. Besides symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation, de novo formation of columnar mucosa in the esophageal remnant is a well-known and frequent phenomenon. In this context, the remnant supra-anastomotic esophagus serves as an in vivo model for the study of Barrett's carcinogenesis. We present a retrospective case analysis of a patient who developed de novo Barrett's metaplasia followed by de novo invasive carcinoma 28 months after gastric pull-up by assessing clinical and molecular parameters.     

Prevention of gastroduodenal content reflux and delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux‐en‐Y anastomosis

Reflux of gastroduodenal contents and delayed gastric emptying are the most common and serious problems after esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction. However, attempts to reduce the above symptoms, surgically as well as non‐surgically, had no or limited effect. To address this issue, we performed retrosternal gastric reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux‐en‐Y anastomosis (RY) in eight patients with thoracic esophageal cancer and compared the outcomes with control patients who underwent standard reconstruction. The procedure is simple, safe, and not associated with any postoperative complications. The pancreatic amylase concentrations in the gastric juice samples on postoperative day 2 were slightly lower in the non‐RY group than in the RY group (1884 ± 2152 vs. 25,790 ± 23,542 IU/mL, respectively, P= 0.07). Postoperative endoscopic examination showed neither reflux esophagitis nor residual gastric content in the RY group. Quality of life assessed by the Dysfunction After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery‐32 questionnaire postoperatively was significantly better in the RY group than in the non‐RY group for ‘decreased physical activity,’‘symptoms of reflux,’‘nausea and vomiting,’ and ‘pain.’ The results of this pilot study suggest that gastric reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus RY seems effective in improving both the reflux and delayed gastric emptying. The benefits of this procedure need to be further assessed in a large‐scale, randomized controlled trial.     

Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in esophageal cancer: a meta‐analysis of published studies

The aim of this meta‐analysis was to clarify whether a longer interval between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery is associated with better outcomes in esophageal cancer. nCRT followed by surgery is the most common approach for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Operations are performed within 2–8 weeks after nCRT; however, the optimal interval between nCRT and surgery for esophageal cancer is unknown. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Clinical Trials database for studies published between January 2000 and December 2014. Eligible studies were prospective or retrospective studies of esophageal cancer that assessed the effects of intervals longer or shorter than 7–8 weeks between the end of nCRT and surgery. The primary end‐points were the overall survival (OS) and pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary end‐points were anastomotic leak, R0 resection, and postoperative mortality rate. A meta‐analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) using fixed‐effect and random‐effect models, with Review Manager 5.2. The five studies that met the eligibility requirements included 1,016 patients: 520 in the shorter interval group (≤7–8 weeks) and 496 in the longer interval group (>7–8 weeks). The results of our meta‐analysis indicate that a longer interval between nCRT and surgery may be disadvantageous for 2‐year OS (OR = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–1.80, P = 0.010) and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.14–2.22, P = 0.009). The pCR, anastomotic leak rate, and postoperative morbidity were similar in the two groups. A longer interval (more than the standard 7–8 weeks) from the end of preoperative nCRT to surgery did not increase the rate of pCR in esophageal cancer, and the different intervals had similar effects on anastomotic leak rate and postoperative mortality rates. However, the longer interval between nCRT and surgery may be disadvantageous for long‐term OS. These results should be validated prospectively in a randomized trial.     

Lymph node dissection with cervical approach as a salvage surgery for locoregional failure after definitive chemoradiotherapy in a patient with recurrent esophageal carcinoma: report of a case

Salvage surgery is one important therapeutic option after locoregional failure of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal carcinoma. We have performed cervical lymph node dissection as a salvage surgery after chemoradiotherapy in a patient with recurrent esophageal carcinoma. A 54-year-old Japanese man was admitted to our hospital because of multiple lymph node metastases after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early-stage esophageal carcinoma. The patient underwent a circumferential ESD of early-stage esophageal carcinoma in another hospital. The esophageal carcinoma, measuring 75 × 60 mm in size, was a superficial spreading type located in the middle portion of the thoracic esophagus. Histology of the resected specimen revealed a moderately to poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, and the depth of invasion was limited within the mucosal layer associated with a small area being attached to the muscularis mucosae. Five months after ESD, lymph node metastases in the regions of right recurrent nerve and the left tracheobronchus were found, for which dCRT was performed. These metastatic lymph nodes disappeared in the chest CT scan images. Lymph node metastasis in the region of the right recurrent nerve then reappeared 8 months after the completion of CRT. Considering the solitary lymph node metastasis and surgical invasiveness, lymph node dissection using a cervical approach was selected as a salvage surgery. Cervical approach for the lymph node dissection in the region of right recurrent nerve may be one feasible option as a minimally invasive salvage surgery for patients with recurrent esophageal carcinoma after dCRT.     

Salvage endoscopic resection after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a Western experience

1. Download : Download high-res image (438KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Surgical site infections at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the surgical infection rate and to identify risk factors associated with surgical site infection. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of all surgical patients between January 1, 1993, and June 30, 1994. The frequency of surgical site infection per 100 surgeries was calculated. The odds ratio (OR) was estimated by using logistic regression analysis. SETTING: A 130-bed tertiary-care teaching hospital for adult patients with cancer. RESULTS: The study followed 3372 surgeries. Three hundred thirteen patients had a surgical site infection (rate per 100 surgeries: 9. 30). The risk factors associated with surgical site infection were diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-4. 91), obesity (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.14-2.7), presence of surgical drains for >5 and <16 days (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.02-3.31), and presence of surgical drains for >/=16 days (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1. 0-4.6). The bacteria most frequently isolated were Escherichia coli 38 (21.8% of the total of microorganisms found), Pseudomonas sp 22 (12.6%), Staphylococcus aureus 16 (9.2%), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 25 (13.6%). The coexistence of other nosocomial infections was greater among the cases (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1-3.1) than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical site infection rate in our hospital is slightly higher than the rates reported for general hospitals. The risk factors associated with surgical site infection are similar to those previously reported. Diabetes mellitus, obesity, and prolonged presence of a surgical drain increased the risk of infection.     

Comparison of the short‐term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via video‐assisted thoracoscopic or open surgery

For patients with esophageal cancer, radical surgical resection of the esophagus and surrounding lymph nodes is the only curative treatment option. The conventional open esophagectomy has the disadvantage of extensive trauma and slow recovery. Recently, video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been applied in esophagectomy, and it appears to have better outcome preliminarily. In this study, we compared the short‐term quality of life (QOL) in patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via VATS or open surgery. A total of 56 patients who underwent three‐incision esophagectomy by the same surgical group from January 2007 to February 2008 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Twenty‐seven patients followed VATS (VATS group) and 29 patients followed open surgery (open group). The EORTC core questionnaire (QLQ C‐30) together with esophageal‐specific module (OES‐18) were applied to assess the short‐term QOL of the patients before and 2, 4, 16, 24 weeks after operation. In result, all of the global quality scale, functioning scale, general symptom scales (or items) did not show differences before operation between the two groups. Further, the scores of global quality and physical functioning were higher in VATS group than in open group overall after operation, however, the scores of fatigue, pain, dyspnea were lower inversely. In conclusion, VATS shows an overall benefit on QOL for the patients with esophageal cancer during the follow‐up of six month after esophagectomy, compared with open surgery.     

Trends and outcomes in the use of surgery and radiation for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity score adjusted analysis of the surveillance,epidemiology, and end results registry from 1998 to 2008

We examined outcomes and trends in surgery and radiation use for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, for whom optimal treatment isn't clear. Trends in surgery and radiation for patients with T1‐T3N1M0 squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the mid or distal esophagus in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1998 to 2008 were analyzed using generalized linear models including year as predictor; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results doesn't record chemotherapy data. Local treatment was unimodal if patients had only surgery or radiation and bimodal if they had both. Five‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using propensity‐score adjusted Cox proportional‐hazard models. Overall 5‐year survival for the 3295 patients identified (mean age 65.1 years, standard deviation 11.0) was 18.9% (95% confidence interval: 17.3–20.7). Local treatment was bimodal for 1274 (38.7%) and unimodal for 2021 (61.3%) patients; 1325 (40.2%) had radiation alone and 696 (21.1%) underwent only surgery. The use of bimodal therapy (32.8–42.5%, P = 0.01) and radiation alone (29.3–44.5%, P < 0.001) increased significantly from 1998 to 2008. Bimodal therapy predicted improved CSS (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.68, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.58, P < 0.001) compared with unimodal therapy. For the first 7 months (before survival curve crossing), CSS after radiation therapy alone was similar to surgery alone (HR: 0.86, P = 0.12) while OS was worse for surgery only (HR: 0.70, P = 0.001). However, worse CSS (HR: 1.43, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.46, P < 0.001) after that initial timeframe were found for radiation therapy only. The use of radiation to treat locally advanced mid and distal esophageal cancers increased from 1998 to 2008. Survival was best when both surgery and radiation were used.