Infliximab or cyclosporine for acute severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective analysis

Background and Aim: Medical treatment of steroid‐refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) is limited to either cyclosporine or infliximab. Studies comparing cyclosporine with either placebo or intravenous methylprednisone showed promise for cyclosporine, but associated it with significant toxicity. There is conflicting, but increasingly positive evidence for using infliximab. There are no studies directly comparing these two treatments. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of patients with steroid‐refractory UC treated with either intravenous cyclosporine or infliximab. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of inpatients with steroid‐refractory UC, treated with either intravenous cyclosporine or infliximab, at Waitemata District Health Board, between January 2001 and February 2010. The primary end‐points were time to colectomy, and colectomy rates at 3 and 12 months. Secondary end‐points were time to discharge from initiation of treatment, steroid dependence at 12 months, and reported adverse events. Results: The total study population was 38, with 19 in the infliximab group. Follow up to 12 months was complete in all patients. At 3 months, the colectomy rate was 63% for cyclosporine, compared to 21% (P = 0.0094). By 12 months the rate was 68% and 37% for cyclosporine and infliximab, respectively (P = 0.06). Patients in the cyclosporine group required an additional 5 days in hospital (P = 0.0086). Steroid dependence at 12 months was 50% for cyclosporine versus 25% for infliximab (P = 0.36). Cyclosporine caused more adverse events (P = 0.17). Conclusions: Infliximab improved clinical outcomes compared to the previous use of intravenous cyclosporine in patients admitted with steroid‐refractory acute severe UC.     

Infliximab as rescue therapy in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite treatment with corticosteroids, severe to moderately severe attacks of ulcerative colitis have a high colectomy rate. We intended to find a rescue therapy other than cyclosporin A, which imposes a high risk of side effects and cyclosporine-related mortality. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blind trial of infliximab or placebo in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis not responding to conventional treatment. Patients were randomized to infliximab/placebo either on day 4 after the initiation of corticosteroid treatment if they fulfilled the index criteria for fulminant ulcerative colitis on day 3 or on day 6-8 if they fulfilled index criteria on day 5-7 for a severe or moderately severe acute attack of ulcerative colitis. Results were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The primary end point was colectomy or death 3 months after randomization. Secondary end points were clinical and endoscopic remission at that time in patients who did not undergo operation. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included (24 infliximab and 21 placebo). No patient died. Seven patients in the infliximab group and 14 in the placebo group had a colectomy (P = .017; odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-17) within 3 months after randomization. No serious side effects occurred. Three patients in the placebo group required operation for septic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab 4-5 mg/kg is an effective and safe rescue therapy in patients experiencing an acute severe or moderately severe attack of ulcerative colitis not responding to conventional treatment.     

Infliximab in patients with severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: Indian experience

Introduction

The role of infliximab in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis is established. However, all the data available in the literature are from western countries. This is the first report on the use of infliximab in patients with severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis from India.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 28 patients who had received infliximab therapy for induction of remission, with three doses of 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, was performed.

Results

Twenty-four (85.6 %) patients had shown a clinical response by week 8 and, hence, avoided urgent colectomy. In 2 years of follow up, 9/16 (56 %) patients had not required colectomy.

Conclusion

Infliximab averted colectomy in a proportion of patients with severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.     

Infliximab in the treatment of severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a pilot study

We report the experience of 11 patients (of 60 planned patients) enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of infliximab in patients with severe, active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The study was terminated prematurely because of slow enrollment. Patients having active disease for at least 2 weeks and receiving at least 5 days of intravenous corticosteroids were eligible to receive a single intravenous infusion of infliximab at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg body weight. The primary endpoint used in this study was treatment failure at 2 weeks after infusion. Treatment failure was defined as 1) unachieved clinical response as defined by a modified Truelove and Witts severity score, 2) increase in corticosteroid dosage, 3) addition of immunosuppressants, 4) colectomy, or 5) death. Safety evaluations included physical examination, clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory tests, and occurrence of adverse experiences. Four of 8 patients (50%) who received infliximab were considered treatment successes at 2 weeks, compared with none of 3 patients who received placebo. Improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rates and serum concentrations of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 correlated with the clinical response observed in patients receiving infliximab. Infusion with infliximab produced no significant adverse events. Infliximab was well tolerated and may provide clinical benefit for some patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.     

Infliximab for acute, not steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a randomized pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic alternatives for patients with acute ulcerative colitis in whom steroids would usually be contraindicated are rare. The antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha, infliximab, has shown to be effective in the treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis in pilot studies. We therefore evaluated whether infliximab can achieve remission in patients with acute ulcerative pancolitis who were not steroid-refractory. METHODS AND DESIGN: Patients were eligible if they had acute disease with a modified Truelove and Witts activity score of more than 10 for at least 2 weeks and if they were currently not receiving immunomodulators or more than 10 mg/day prednisolone. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either three intravenous infusions of infliximab at 5 mg/kg (group A) or high-dose prednisolone (1.5 mg/kg body weight) daily for 2 weeks, followed by 1 mg/kg for 1 week, followed by a weekly reduction of 5 mg (group B). Therapy success was defined as clinical response in terms of a decrease of more than 5 points from the baseline score and to less than 10 points total after 3 weeks as well as after 13 weeks. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (seven women, six men) were randomized (six for group A and seven for group B). The median baseline activity scores were 13.5 (12-18) in group A and 14.0 (11-18) in group B. Five of six patients in group A and six of seven patients in group B showed therapy success after 3 weeks as well as after 13 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab could be effective in the treatment of acute moderate or severe ulcerative colitis. The obtained data call for larger controlled trials.     

Infliximab salvage therapy after cyclosporine in an acute flare of chronic ulcerative colitis.

Although infliximab (Remicade, Schering Canada Inc, Quebec) therapy has been well studied in steroid refractory Crohn's disease, its use remains controversial in chronic ulcerative colitis. A 24-year-old woman with a 14-year history of well controlled left sided ulcerative colitis presented with an acute flare. Clinical, endoscopic and biopsy evidence of an acute flare of ulcerative pancolitis were present. There was no response to intravenous steroids but improvement was seen after receiving 14 days of intravenous cyclosporine (4 mg/kg/day continuous infusion). The patient was discharged from hospital with azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg/day) and low dose oral cyclosporine (4 mg/kg/day). She presented with worsening symptoms seven days after discharge. Because of the patient's unwillingness for surgery, she instead received two injections of infliximab 5 mg/kg at week 0 and week 2. An initial response occurred, but her clinical improvement was not durable. Colectomy was performed four weeks later. This is the first report of infliximab as a salvage therapy in an acute flare of chronic ulcerative colitis following failure of cyclosporine.     

Antiviral therapy in cytomegalovirus-positive ulcerative colitis:A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM:To evaluate the impact of antiviral treatment on cytomegalovirus(CMV)-positive ulcerative colitis patients.METHODS:We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis(MA)of comparative cohort and casecontrol studies published between January 1966 and March 2013.Studies focusing on colectomy series and studies including only less than 3 patients in the treated or non-treated arm were excluded.The primary outcome was colectomy within 30 d of diagnosis.Secondary outcomes included colectomy during the follow-up period Subgroup analyses by method of detection of CMV,study design,risk of bias and country of origin were performed.Quality of studies was evalu-ated according to modified New-Castle Ottawa Scale.RESULTS:After full-text review,nine studies with a total of 176 patients were included in our MA.All the included studies were of low to moderate quality.Patients who have received antiviral treatment had a higher risk of 30-d colectomy(OR=2.40;95%CI:1.05-5.50;I2=37.2%).A subgroup analysis including only patients in whom CMV diagnosis was based did not demonstrate a significant difference between the groups(OR=3.41;95%CI:0.39-29.83;I2=56.9%).Analysis of long-term colectomy rates was possible for 6 studies including110 patients.No statistically significant difference was found between the treated and untreated groups(OR=1.71;95%CI:0.71-4.13;6 studies,I2=0%).Analysis of mortality rate was not possible due to a very limited number of cases.Stratification of the outcomes by disease severity was not possible.CONCLUSION:No positive association between antiviral treatment and a favorable outcome was demonstrated.These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to primary studies’quality and potential biases.     

Intravenous cyclosporine versus intravenous corticosteroids as single therapy for severe attacks of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cyclosporine has been effective in patients with steroid-refractory attacks of ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated the effects of intravenous (IV) cyclosporine as single IV therapy (without glucocorticosteroids) for severe UC and compared these with the response to glucocorticosteroids. METHODS: Patients with a severe attack of UC were randomized to treatment with IV cyclosporine, 4 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1), or with methylprednisolone, 40 mg/day, in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. After 8 days, patients who had a response received the same medication orally in combination with azathioprine. Patients were followed up clinically, endoscopically, and by scintigraphy. Renal function was assessed using urinary inulin clearances. Endpoints were clinical improvement, discharge from the hospital, and remission up to 12 months after intravenous therapy. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. After 8 days, 8 of 15 patients (53%) who received methylprednisolone had a response to therapy vs. 9 of 14 (64%) receiving cyclosporine. In nonresponders, 3 of 7 methylprednisolone patients and 1 of 3 cyclosporine patients improved when both treatments were combined. No serious drug-related toxicity was observed with either treatment. At 12 months, 7 of 9 patients (78%) initially controlled with cyclosporine maintained their remission vs. 3 of 8 (37%) initially treated with methylprednisolone. No clinically significant decrease of renal function was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine monotherapy is an effective and safe alternative to glucocorticosteroids in patients with severe attacks of UC.     

Moxibustion for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background  

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly used for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Acupuncture-type treatments are among the most popular options. Several studies have reported that moxibustion is effective in ulcerative colitis (UC). The objective of this review was to assess the clinical evidence for or against moxibustion as a treatment for UC.     

Ability of different rescue therapies to save the bowel in acute,severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis

To date, corticosteroids have been the primary therapies for acute, severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients not responding to intravenous steroids assessed at 3–5 days of the treatment are candidates for second-line rescue therapy. Cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus and infliximab (IFX) are also effective therapeutic options in acute, severe UC. In this review we summarized the results of the published studies examining and comparing the efficacy of CsA, tacrolimus and IFX as rescue therapies, and assessing the outcome of switching the drugs in case of therapeutic failure.     

Early colectomy in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis improves operative outcome

Purpose

Up to a third of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) fail to respond to intensive steroid therapy and eventually require a salvage colectomy. We have previously reported that the mortality of emergency colectomy can be decreased by offering it within the first week of intensive medical therapy. We implemented this policy and report the results of our experience.

Methods

The clinical records of all patients with ASUC who underwent emergency colectomy after failure of medical therapy between January 2005 and July 2015 were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. The data were analysed with regard to duration of intensive medical therapy, timing of surgery, in-hospital mortality and post-operative complications.

Results

Eighty-eight patients underwent emergency surgery for ASUC after failed medical therapy. Of these, 75 (85.2%) were operated within 7 days of initiation of intensive medical therapy [n = 51 (58%) were operated < 5 days]. One patient who was operated on day 8 following steroid therapy died postoperatively. The current post-operative mortality of 1.1% (1/88) was significantly lower than the mortality noted in the previously recorded retrospective case series [8/51 (15.6%); p = 0.001]. In addition, the incidence of overall (9/13 vs. 23/75; p = 0.012) and clinically significant (12/75 vs. 6/13; p = 0.022) complications was significantly higher in patients operated after 7 days as compared to those operated within 7 days.

Conclusion

The policy of early colectomy, within 7 days, in patients with ASUC who fail to respond to intensive steroid-based therapy improves perioperative outcomes with significantly low in-hospital mortality and morbidity.