Single dose levofloxacin prophylaxis for prostate biopsy in patients at low risk

PURPOSE: We determine if a single 500 mg. oral tablet of levofloxacin represents adequate prophylaxis for patients at low risk who undergo transrectal prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2000 to May 2001 we prospectively evaluated 400 consecutive men who underwent transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate after a single 500 mg. oral dose of levofloxacin. Under an institutional review board approved protocol the drug was issued under a standing order by a clinic nurse 30 to 60 minutes before the procedure. Patients were issued 2 additional daily doses of levofloxacin if they were deemed at increased risk for infectious complications, that is if they had a large prostate more than 75 cc, diabetes mellitus, recent steroid use, severe voiding dysfunction or immune compromise. No patient received a cleansing enema before the procedure. Complications, the number of biopsy cores, prostate size and cancer detection rates were assessed. RESULTS: Only 1 of the 377 patients at low risk in whom biopsy was completed experienced a symptomatic urinary tract infection (0.27%). None of the 23 men at high risk who received additional doses of levofloxacin experienced a complication. Thus, the overall infection rate was 1 of 400 cases (0.25%) in this series. A mean of 7 biopsy cores (range 2 to 16) was obtained per patient and mean prostate volume was 49.75 cc (range 12 to 150). Prostate cancer was present in 93 patients (23%). CONCLUSIONS: A single 500 mg. dose of levofloxacin before transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate is effective and safe in patients at low risk. The administration of prophylaxis by a clinic nurse under a standing order optimizes patient compliance and physician efficiency. In patients at higher risk for infection additional antibiotic administration appears to provide adequate prophylaxis.     

Prospective assessment of the efficacy of single dose versus traditional 3‐day antimicrobial prophylaxis in 12‐core transrectal prostate biopsy

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in 12‐core transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. Methods: A total of 400 patients who underwent prostate biopsy with TRUS guidance were included. The patients were prospectively randomized in three groups regarding antibiotic prophylaxis. The first group (139 patients) received a single gram of intramuscular ceftriaxone, while the second group (131 patients) had a 3‐day course of oral ciprofloxacin. The third group (130 patients) had single oral 500 mg of ciprofloxacin. All patients had urine cultures prior to biopsy and on the second day after biopsy. Results: The study groups were compared in terms of the results of urine cultures and clinical parameters. Overall, only seven patients (1.8% of the cases) had positive urine cultures with no difference between these three groups. Additionally, no significant difference was observed regarding morbidity rates in all groups. Only eight patients (2%) developed major complications requiring hospitalization. There was no increase in the rate of infectious complications when the biopsy core numbers were increased up to 12. Conclusions: The current study suggests that a single oral dose of antimicrobial prophylaxis is reasonable in TRUS prostate biopsy even in the case of 12‐core sampling.     

Safety and side effects of transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis

Study aimsTo investigate safety and side effects of transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis. Secondary aim was to identify whether the number of cores influenced the occurrence of complications.Patients and methodsA cohort of 184 patients undergoing perineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis from 2015 to 2017 was analyzed retrospectively. On average, 41 cores were taken via two perineal skin punctures. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from patients´ electronic medical records. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for complications with the following covariates: age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, history of prostatitis, therapeutic anticoagulation, risk factors for urinary tract infection, surgery duration, and the number of biopsy cores. Furthermore, we calculated chi-squared tests with post hoc analyses for differences in the occurrence of complications between quartiles of the above-mentioned parameters.ResultsThe overall complication rate was 10.8% (20/185). Out of 20, 19 (95 %) complications were ≤ grade 2 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. There were two cases of afebrile urinary tract infection, and no patient developed fever or sepsis. Acute urinary retention was reported in 10 patients (5.4 %). The total number of cores was not associated to infectious complications or acute urinary retention rates.ConclusionsTransperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis is a safe procedure. Neither postoperative fever nor sepsis occurred. An increased number of cores through two skin punctures was not associated with more complications.     

Systematic Review of Complications of Prostate Biopsy

Context

Prostate biopsy is commonly performed for cancer detection and management. The benefits and risks of prostate biopsy are germane to ongoing debates about prostate cancer screening and treatment.

Objective

To perform a systematic review of complications from prostate biopsy.

Evidence acquisition

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase, supplemented with additional references. Articles were reviewed for data on the following complications: hematuria, rectal bleeding, hematospermia, infection, pain, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), urinary retention, erectile dysfunction, and mortality.

Evidence synthesis

After biopsy, hematuria and hematospermia are common but typically mild and self-limiting. Severe rectal bleeding is uncommon. Despite antimicrobial prophylaxis, infectious complications are increasing over time and are the most common reason for hospitalization after biopsy. Pain may occur at several stages of prostate biopsy and can be mitigated by anesthetic agents and anxiety-reduction techniques. Up to 25% of men have transient LUTS after biopsy, and <2% have frank urinary retention, with slightly higher rates reported after transperineal template biopsy. Biopsy-related mortality is rare.

Conclusions

Preparation for biopsy should include antimicrobial prophylaxis and pain management. Prostate biopsy is frequently associated with minor bleeding and urinary symptoms that usually do not require intervention. Infectious complications can be serious, requiring prompt management and continued work into preventative strategies.     

Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND: There are two established techniques of prostate biopsy: the more widely used transrectal technique, and the transperineal technique. Although the transrectal technique is faster, it is reported to have an increased risk of septic complications, which may be life threatening. The present study compares complication rates of both techniques at Nambour General Hospital. METHODS: The present retrospective study was performed by reviewing all available medical charts of men who underwent prostate biopsy during the years 1996-2001. The following data were recorded in a database: date of birth; digital rectal examination findings; serum prostate specific antigen (PSA); biopsy technique; number of cores taken; number of positive cores; Gleason grade and score; complications. Results were tabulated and simple statistical analysis performed to compare both groups. RESULTS: A total of 197 biopsies was included in the study, with 81 transperineal biopsies in 75 men, and 116 transrectal biopsies in 103 men. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, including sepsis, between transrectal biopsy and transperineal biopsy. The rate of sepsis was 1.2% for the transperineal technique, and 0% for the transrectal technique (P = 0.411, Fisher exact test). Overall complication rates were 22.2% for transperineal technique and 19.8% for transrectal technique (P = 0.773, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: Although the present study was limited by retrospective design and size it suggests that both techniques are equally safe. A review of medical literature supports a tranperineal approach to patients who will tolerate sepsis poorly, or who have a suspected inflammatory cause of their raised PSA.     

The role of targeted prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before transrectal ultrasonography‐guided prostate biopsy in reducing infection rates: a systematic review

To compare the incidence of infective complications after transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)‐guided biopsy with either empirical fluoroquinolone or culture‐based targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis, and the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance (FQ‐R) in men undergoing prostate biopsy. A systematic review of the literature was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included studies of patients undergoing TRUS‐guided biopsy that compared infective outcomes of those who received targeted antimicrobial therapy based on the results of pre‐procedural rectal swab cultures, with those receiving empiric fluoroquinolone antimicrobial prophylaxis. The prevalence of FQ‐R was recorded as a secondary outcome measure. Studies with no control group were excluded. From 125 studies screened, nine studies (4 571 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All studies were of cohort design, and included a combination of retrospective and prospective data. Six studies included were undertaken in North America. The remaining studies were undertaken in Spain, Turkey and Columbia. Within these studies, 2 484 (54.3%) patients received empirical fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, whilst 2 087 (45.7%) patients had pre‐biopsy rectal swabs and targeted antibiotics. The mean FQ‐R was 22.8%. Post‐biopsy infection and sepsis rates were significantly higher in groups given empirical prophylaxis (4.55% and 2.21%) compared with groups receiving targeted antibiotics (0.72% and 0.48%). Based on these results 27 men would need to receive targeted antibiotics to prevent one infective complication. Our systematic review suggests that targeted prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before TRUS‐guided prostate biopsy is associated with lower rates of sepsis. We therefore recommend changing current pathways to adopt this measure.     

Selective transperineal prostate biopsy for fluoroquinolone-resistance patients reduces sepsis and cost

Background:Urosepsis is a recognized complication of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx). Pre-biopsy rectal swabs have been used to identify patients with microorganisms in the rectal flora resistant to the conventionally used empirical prophylaxis. The transperineal route of biopsy (TP-Bx) has a lower complication risk but comes at an increased cost.Materials and methods:Retrospective cohort study including patients undergoing prostate biopsies between October/2015 and April/2018. The intervention cohort, a rectal swab was performed, the result of which dictated the biopsy route; TRUS-Bx against TP-Bx. TP-Bx for patients with fluoroquinolone resistance or extended-spectrum β-lactamase. The control cohort underwent TRUS without a rectal swab receiving empirical antibiotics—oral ciprofloxacin and intravenous gentamicin.Results:Total 1000 patients were included in which 500 underwent a swab, 14 (2.8%) developed post-TRUS biopsy infective complications with 3 having positive bacteremia (0.6%); 500 had no swab, 47 (9.4%) developed post-TRUS biopsy infective complications with 22 (4.4%, p < 0.05) having positive bacteremia. Three patients (0.6%) of patients who underwent swab developed urinary tract infection symptoms whilst 12 (2.4%) had urinary tract infection in the control group. In those patients that underwent a swab, 14 required hospitalization with mean length of stay of 2.5 days versus 43 patients of the control with 3.6 days. Cost analysis concluded savings of this strategy was £18,711.Conclusions:We have demonstrated a protocol that reserves template biopsies for higher risk patients and can significantly reduce sepsis and other infectious complication rates whilst also proving to be a cost-efficient strategy. We recommend that units not utilizing rectal swabs to uncover the fluoroquinolone resistance rate by introducing them. We advocate units that already utilize rectal swabs, to introduce transperineal biopsy for their higher risk patients.     

Meningitis caused by multiresistant E. coli after an echo-directed transrectal biopsy

Transrectal prostate biopsy is the most accurate method for prostate cancer diagnosis. Although an antimicrobial prophylaxis is employed in most cases, infectious complications are among the most severe. We present a case of E. coli multirresistant meningitis after transrectal prostate biopsy despite quinolone prophylaxis.     

Prevalence of fluoroquinolone‐resistant rectal flora in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate needle biopsy: A prospective multicenter study

Objectives

To estimate the prevalence of fluoroquinolone‐resistant rectal flora in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate needle biopsy and to identify the high‐risk groups.

Methods

From January 2015 to March 2016, rectal swabs of 557 men who underwent transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate needle biopsy were obtained from five institutions. Clinical variables, including demographics, rectal swab culture results and infectious complications, were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify the risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance of rectal flora and infectious complications.

Results

The incidence of fluoroquinolone‐resistant and extended‐spectrum beta‐lactamase production was 48.1 and 11.8%, respectively. The most common fluoroquinolone‐resistant bacteria was Escherichia coli (81% of total fluoroquinolone‐resistant bacteria, 39% of total rectal flora), and 16 (2.9%) patients had infectious complications. Univariable and multivariable analysis of clinical parameters affecting fluoroquinolone resistance showed no factor associated with fluoroquinolone resistance of rectal flora. The clinical parameter related to infectious complications after prostate biopsy was a history of operation within 6 months (relative risk 6.60; 95% confidence interval 1.99–21.8, P = 0.002).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that a risk‐based approach by history taking cannot predict antibiotic resistance of rectal flora, and physicians should consider targeted antibiotic prophylaxis or extended antibiotic prophylaxis for Korean patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate biopsy because of high antibiotic resistance of rectal flora.     

Transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal 14-core systematic biopsy detects apico-anterior cancer foci of T1c prostate cancer

AIM: The optimal biopsy strategy for prostate cancer detection, especially in men with isolated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation, remains to be defined. We evaluated diagnostic yield and safety of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided transperineal systematic 14-core biopsy and compared the spatial distribution of cancer foci detected with this technique in men with and without abnormality on digital rectal examination (DRE). METHODS: In a prospective study, 289 men aged between 50 and 87 years (median age, 70 years) underwent TRUS-guided transperineal systematic 14-core prostate biopsy because of elevated PSA and/or abnormal DRE findings. Using the fan technique, 12 cores from the peripheral zone and two cores from the transition zone were obtained systematically. To characterize the spatial distribution of cancer positive cores, site-specific overall and unique cancer detection rates were compared between stage T1c and T2 cancers. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 105 of the 289 patients (36%). Major complications requiring prolonged hospital stay or re-hospitalization during a 4-week postbiopsy period were rare (1.4%). Sixty-seven stage T1c cancers were identified. These cancers were associated with significantly lower PSA and a smaller number of cancer positive cores when compared with stage T2 cancers (n= 38). The overall cancer detection rate was highest at the anterior peripheral zone and the posterior peripheral zone in stage T1c and stage T2 cancers, respectively. The unique cancer detection rate at the anterior peripheral zone was significantly higher in stage T1c cancers than in stage T2 cancers. Therefore, when the prostate is extensively biopsied using the transperineal approach, cancer positive cores are characteristically distributed anteriorly in stage T1c cancers and posteriorly in stage T2 cancers. CONCLUSIONS: TRUS-guided transperineal systematic 14-core biopsy showed an apico-anterior distribution of cancer foci in stage T1c prostate cancers.     

Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in core prostate biopsy: Impact of timing and identification of risk factors

OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of infectious complications and the impact of timing of a single, prophylactic, oral dose of ciprofloxacin 750 mg given either 2 hours before or in conjunction with ultrasound-guided core biopsy of the prostate in men without recognised risk factors and to analyse potential risk factors. METHODS: All men undergoing prostate biopsy for elevated prostate specific antigen or clinical suspected prostate cancer were enrolled in an open, comparative prospective study. Excluded were men with recognised risk factors for infective complications. Two end points were chosen: febrile genitourinary infection and the results of postbiopsy urine culture. RESULTS: A total of 1322 prostate biopsy occasions were made in 1157 men. Twelve (0.9%) cases of febrile genitourinary infections were recorded, two of which had proven sepsis. Administrating the drug 2 hours before or at the time of biopsy (p > 0.5) showed no statistical difference. Eight of 12 patients were shown to have prebiopsy undisclosed risk factors. Four percent developed postbiopsy, asymptomatic, significant bacteriuria. In addition, three (27%) men with prebiopsy unrecognised bacteriuria, who were accidentally enrolled, developed febrile genitourinary infection; one had proven sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: A single high-dose of oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg can be administered in direct conjunction with prostate biopsy to men without recognised risk factors, keeping the infection rate at approximately 1%. Bacteriuria before biopsy is a major risk factor for infective complications. Attention given to recognising individual risk factors would reduce the risk of infection further.     

Prophylactic use of isepamicin and levofloxacin for transrectal prostate biopsy: A retrospective single center study

Objectives:   To evaluate the combination of isepamicin and levofloxacin in the prophylaxis of infectious complications associated with prostate biopsy (PBX).
Methods:   A total of 586 patients who underwent transrectal PBX in a single center were included in this retrospective analysis. They received 400 mg isepamicin once just before PBX plus 300 mg oral levofloxacin each day for three days as a rule. Clinical and laboratory data were evaluated.
Results:   A total of three (0.51%) patients presented a febrile complication after PBX. All of them were diagnosed as acute prostatitis. Serum white blood cell count and C-reactive protein in the 131 patients whose laboratory data were available for statistical analyses did not rise significantly after PBX.
Conclusions:   Isepamicin plus fluoroquinolone can be considered a valuable regimen for antibiotic prophylaxis of PBX.     

Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy

OBJECTIVES: To explore an optimal combination of sampling sites to detect prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting. METHODS: A transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic three-dimensional 26-core biopsy (3D26PBx), a combination of transrectal 12 and transperineal 14 core biopsies, was performed in 235 Japanese men with prior negative biopsy. Using recursive partitioning, we evaluated cancer detection of all possible combinations of sampling sites and selected the combination that provides the highest cancer detection rate at a given number of biopsy cores. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 87 of the 235 (37%) men. The 3D26PBx improved cancer detection by 89% relative to the conventional transrectal sextant biopsy. Neither Gleason score nor percentage of Gleason 4/5 cancers differed between cancers with and without positive cores within the transrectal sextant-sampling sites. A three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal approaches outperformed either transrectal or transperineal approach alone. Recursive partitioning revealed that a three-dimensional 16-core (transrectal eight cores plus transperineal eight cores) biopsy could detect all the cancers with the minimum number of cores. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a three-dimensional combination of transrectal eight cores taken from the far lateral peripheral zone and the parasagittal base, and transperineal eight cores taken from the anterior and posterior apex and the transition zone as an optimal set of sampling sites for repeat biopsy.     

Comparisons of efficacy and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy with or without antibiotic prophylaxis

Background and purposeWe aimed to determine the cancer detection rate and complications of transrectal prostate biopsy (TRBx) and transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) in the hospital. However, given the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in TPBx remains controversial according to the current guidelines, we also investigated the safety and side effects of TPBx with and without antibiotic prophylaxis.Materials and methodsA total of 777 patients who underwent prostate biopsy were enrolled in this study in accordance with the criteria. The primary outcome was pooled infectious complications (sepsis, fever, symptomatic urinary tract infection and urinary retention), and the secondary outcome was prostate cancer detection rate.ResultsFindings showed that TPBx and TRBx were equivalent in terms of prostate cancer detection rate (TPBx: 50.4% vs. TRBx: 47.3%; P = 0.424) and urinary retention (TPBx: 5% vs. TRBx: 6.3%; P = 0.451). However, TRBx had significantly higher incidences of sepsis (risk ratios, RR: 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21–11.03; P = 0.014) and symptomatic urinary tract infection (RR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.07–8.66; P = 0.029) than TPBx. Notably, for TPBx, patients who received a single dose of cephazolin prophylaxis were not associated with the risk of sepsis (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.13–4.63; P = 0.783) and symptomatic urinary tract infection (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.24–5.74; P = 0.848) in contrast to patients who did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. Meanwhile, no effects on prostate cancer detection rate and urinary retention were observed in the TPBx group.ConclusionsOur findings indicated that TPBx significantly reduced infectious complications compared with TRBx and should therefore be preferred. Importantly, we need to re-examine whether the antibiotic prophylaxis should be routinely applied before TPBx in consideration of increasing antibiotic resistance. This result complements the current national guidelines. Nevertheless, future studies on this topic with improved quality and increased sample size are still needed to minimise bacterial resistance.     

The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy

OBJECTIVES: We compared the detection rates of different transperineal prostate biopsy protocols with the aim to optimize the number of cores to sample according to prostate volume. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 2002 to October 2004 we evaluated 480 consecutive patients with PSA between 2.5 and 20 ng/ml undergoing the first set of prostate biopsy. All patients underwent a 14-core TRUS-guided transperineal prostate biopsy, including 12 cores in the peripheral and two in the transitional zone. The detection rate of the 14-core scheme was compared to the one of the other biopsy schemes obtained through the exclusion of pairs of cores. Data were stratified according to the different TRUS estimated prostate volumes. RESULTS: The detection rate of the standard sextant was 35.2%, while those of the 8-core schemes ranged from 37.1 to 38.8%. The 10-core schemes yielded detection rates of 39.6-40.8% and the protocol with 12 biopsies in the peripheral zone diagnosed prostate cancer in 42.1% of the patients. In patients with <30 cc prostate volume, the detection rate of the 14-core scheme was 43.8% and resulted statistically overlapping to the 8-peripheral cores protocol. In patients with 30.1-50 cc prostate volume a 12-peripheral core biopsy reproduced the results of the 14-core sampling. In prostates larger than 50 cc, an even more extensive procedure was mandatory, considering the low detection rate of the 14-core scheme (24.2%). CONCLUSION: Transperineal prostate biopsy is a safe procedure with a very low complication rate and high cancer detection rate. Prostate volume is the most relevant variable in the planning of the optimal number of cores in the extensive first biopsy set. A protocol with more than 8 peripheral cores) is recommended only in patients with prostate volume larger than 30 cc.     

The role of a standardized 36 core template-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy technique in patients with previously negative transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Template assisted transperineal biopsy of the prostate has become increasingly popular over the past decade. Several studies have demonstrated that transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) is associated with an increased rate of cancer detection, increased histological concordance with final prostatectomy samples and an increase in anterior and apical prostate cancers than standard TRUS biopsy. However, interpretation of the literature is difficult due to considerable variation between studies in terms of technique and equipment. We examined a small cohort (n= 40) of patients using a standardized 36 core template assisted TPB technique. We show that utilising this technique is associated with high cancer (68%) detection rate in patients with two previous negative TRUS biopsies. Of patients were found to have anterior gland tumours which would not have been detected by standard TRUS guided biopsy.

OBJECTIVE

? To determine the efficacy and safety of a standardized 36 core template‐assisted transperineal biopsy technique for detecting prostate cancer in patients with previously negative transrectal ultrasonography‐guided prostate biopsies and elevated prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

? Between April 2008 to September 2010, a total of 40 patients with a mean (range) age of 63 (49–73) years, a mean (range) elevated PSA level of 21.9 (4.7–87) ng/mL and two previous sets of negative TRUS‐guided prostate biopsies underwent standardized 36 core template‐assisted transperineal prostate biopsies under general anaesthetic as a day case procedure. ? The cancer detection rate and complications for all cases were evaluated.

RESULTS

? In total, 27 of 40 (68%) patients were found to have adenocarcinoma of the prostate, two patients (5.0%) had atypical small acinar proliferation, one had high‐grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (2.5%), four (10%) had chronic active inflammation and six (15%) had benign histology. ? Gleason scores were in the range 6–9, with a median Gleason score of 7. ? There were no cases of urosepsis, urinary tract infections or haematuria. A single patient experienced acute urinary retention, with a subsequent succesful trial without a catheter, and haematospermia was common, although minor.

CONCLUSIONS

? Our standardized 36 core template‐assisted transperineal prostate biopsy technique is safe and associated with a high detection rate of prostate cancer. ? This technique should be considered in patients with elevated PSA levels and previously negative TRUS‐guided prostate biopsies.     

9+X法直肠超声引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺活检420例分析

目的:探讨9+X法经直肠超声引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺活检术诊断前列腺癌的临床价值及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2004年1月至2008年12月行9+X法经直肠超声引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺活检术的可疑前列腺癌患者420例临床资料。结果:穿刺确诊前列腺癌160例(阳性率38.1%)。PSA<4μg/L、4～10μg/L、>10μg/L、直肠指检(DRE)异常、经直肠或经腹部超声检查有异常者阳性率分别为7.4%、17.8%、65.4%、25.0%、22.2%。穿刺术后79例出现血尿(18.8%),急性尿潴留13例(3.1%),发热9例(2.1%),无其他严重并发症。结论:9+X法经直肠超声引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺阳性率高,并发症少,是诊断前列腺癌的理想方法。     

经会阴前列腺24针饱和穿刺活检与14针活检在PSA＜20μg/L患者中筛检前列腺癌的对比性研究

目的:探讨超声引导下经会阴前列腺24针饱和穿刺活检与14针穿刺活检方案对PSA<20μg/L可疑前列腺癌患者的筛检阳性率及其相关并发症。方法:选取116例可疑前列腺癌患者行经会阴超声引导下14针穿刺活检(14针组),另136例患者,行经会阴24针饱和前列腺穿刺活检(24针饱和组),比较两组前列腺癌筛检阳性率、标本阳性率及穿刺后肉眼血尿、泌尿系感染、尿潴留等并发症的发生率。结果:两组患者平均年龄、穿刺前PSA水平、平均前列腺体积等指标均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。24针饱和组及14针组前列腺癌筛检总体阳性率分别为48.53%和17.24%,存在显著性差异(P<0.001),标本阳性率分别为8.09%和2.83%(P=0.012);其中24针饱和组前列腺尖部肿瘤的检出率(11.76%)显著高于14针组(1.72%,P<0.05)。两组穿刺后尿潴留、泌尿系感染和肉眼血尿等发生率均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:24针经会阴前列腺饱和穿刺活检方法显著提高PSA<20μg/L患者中前列腺癌的筛检阳性率,尤其是增加了前列腺尖部区域的肿瘤筛检阳性率,而并未增加相关并发症。     

Efficacy of periprostatic nerve blockade during ultrasound-guided transrectal 10-core biopsy of the prostate

PURPOSE: We examined the efficacy and safety of periprostatic nerve blockade during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transrectal ultrasound guided 10 core biopsy of the prostate was performed in 116 consecutive men. From March 2002 to July 2003, 58 men underwent biopsy of the prostate without local anesthesia (control group). From August 2003 to March 2004, 58 men received periprostatic nerve blockade before prostate biopsies (anesthesia group). A 4-ml dose of 1% lidocaine was injected at 2 or 3 locations on each side of the prostate via a 23 gauge needle. Pain during biopsy was questioned using a 5-point Face scale and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: The average pain score during biopsy was 1.9 in the anesthesia group versus 3.1 in the control group (p<0.001). In the anesthesia group 20.7% of patients had a pain score 3 or greater than 3 versus 69% in the control group. The complication rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Periprostatic nerve blockade is a safe and effective method of anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy.     

Does needle calibre affect pain and complication rates in patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy？ A prospective,randomized trial

Transperineal prostate biopsy is a procedure that can be used to obtain histological samples from the prostate. To improve both the quality of the biopsy core samples and prostate cancer detection, we are currently performing a prospective, randomized trial comparing prostate biopsy samples obtained using an 18 G-needle to those obtained using a 16 G-needle. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate pain and complication rates in both groups in order to assess whether performing a prostate biopsy with a larger calibre needle is a feasible procedure. One hundred and eighty-seven patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy were prospectively evaluated and divided into two groups. The first group （94 patients, Group A） received a transperineal prostate biopsy using a 16 G-needle and the second group （93 patients, Group B） underwent transperineal prostate biopsy with an 18 G-needle. Anaesthesia was obtained with a single perineal injection at the prostatic apex in all subjects. A visual analogue scale （VAS） and facial expression scale （FES） were used to assess pain during multiple steps of the procedure in each group. A detailed questionnaire was used to obtain information about drug use because it could potentially influence the pain and complications that patients experienced. Two weeks after the procedure, early and late complications were evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using non-parametric tests. Prostate Specific Antigen （PSA） and drug use were similar at baseline between the two groups. Pain during prostate biopsy, which was measured with both the VAS and FES instruments, did not differ significantly between the 18- and 16 G-needle groups, and no significant differences were found in early or late complication rates between the groups. Transperineal prostate biopsy with a 16 G-needle is a feasible Further studies with larger patient populations are required to prostate cancer detection rates. procedure in terms of pain and complication rates. assess whether or not this procedure can improve