Simultaneous two-level esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with mild and severe esophagitis

Simultaneous ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring was performed in 10 patients (group 1) with normal distal acid exposure and in 40 patients (group 2) with pathological distal reflux. The probes were placed 5 and 10 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter to quantify variations of pH values that can be due to a displacement of pH sensor. In group 1 the median percent time with pH<4 for total and upright monitoring periods and composite score were significantly lower at the proximal than the distal level. In group 2 all pH data were significantly lower at the proximal than the distal level. The patients with pathological reflux were subdivided into two subgroups based on endoscopic findings (mild and severe esophagitis). The patients with severe esophagitis showed a proximal acid reduction higher than in patients with mild esophagitis. Nine patients with mild esophagitis showed normal values at 10 cm, but all patients with severe esophagitis had abnormal proximal acid exposure.     

Ambulatory esophageal pressure and pH monitoring in patients with high-grade reflux esophagitis

Using conventional manometry and 24-hr ambulatory pressure and pH monitoring, we investigated esophageal motility and the esophageal motor response to reflux in 11 patients with reflux esophagitis Savary-Miller grade III and IV, and an age- and sex-matched group of 11 healthy controls. The patients had a significantly increased esophageal acid exposure. Conventional manometry showed a significantly decreased LES pressure and distal peristaltic amplitude in patients. The 24-hr monitoring yielded a significant decrease in peristaltic contraction duration and peristaltic propagation velocity in the patient group. Distal peristaltic amplitude was not decreased. Analysis of the contractions occurring in the 2-min period after each reflux episode showed a reduced number of contractions during the upright period, caused by a significantly decreased number of peristaltic contractions. During the supine period, there was a trend towards an increased number of contractions. It is concluded that esophageal motor activity and the response to reflux are impaired in patients with high-grade reflux esophagitis. However, the abnormalities found are only minor and are unlikely to play an important role in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis.     

pH电极位置对反流性食管炎酸监测的影响

目的探讨pH电极位置对反流性食管炎酸度监测的影响.方法60例反流性食管炎随机分为对照(C)组和试验(T)组.C组30例用测压法将pH电极置于下食管括约肌(LES)上缘5cm处;T组30例用pH梯度法将电极放于胃食管连接处(GEJ)上方5cm处.连续24hpH监测.结果C与T组前鼻孔至GEJ平均距离(46.2±4.1cm与46.5±4.5cm)无明显差异(P=0.8).两组GEJ平均距离(46.3±4.3cm)比C组前鼻孔至LES上缘平均距离(43.3±3.1cm)低3.0cm(P=0.0003).食管酸监测的pH＜4总百分时间和总计分在T组(8.5和45.5)和T组中GEJ＞LES上缘±3cm范围者(10.0和99.3),较C组(4.8和26.3)均有明显增高(P均＜0.01),而T组中GEJ≤LES上缘±3cm范围者(7.1和39.4)则无明显差异(P均＞0.05)结论因GEJ常比LES上缘偏低,故以GEJ安放电极(尤其是GEJ＞LES上缘±3cm范围者)对反流性食管炎行pH监测时,这可能会扩大酸监测结果.     

Declined human esophageal mucin secretion in patients with severe reflux esophagitis

It has been recently demonstrated that human esophageal submucosal mucous glands exhibit the ability to secrete copious amounts of mucin, well known within the gastrointestinal tract for its protective quality against hydrogen ion and pepsin. Since mucin may also play a protective role within the esophageal compartment, we have studied the rate of secretion of esophageal mucin in patients with RE. Mucin was assessed by periodic acid-Schiff methodology in esophageal secretion collected during continuous perfusion with saline (period I) followed by HCl (period II), HCl/pepsin (period III), and final saline (period IV), mimicking the natural gastroesophageal scenario. The basal rate of the luminal release of mucin in patients with grade II RE was 18% lower as compared with controls. During exposure of the esophageal mucosa to an HCl/pepsin solution, esophageal mucin output in the RE group was 52% lower than in the control group (0.154 ± 0.027 vs 0.320 ± 0.049 mg/cm²/min;P=0.025). Furthermore, the rates of esophageal mucin output in patients with grade III RE during esophageal perfusion with saline and HCl/pepsin were 62% (0.090 ± 0.021 vs 0.239 ± 0.036 mg/cm²/min;P=0.016) and 86% (0.048 ± 0.010 vs 0.320 ± 0.049 mg/cm²/min;P=0.001) lower when compared with corresponding values in controls. After endoscopic healing of RE, the overall impairment in the rate of esophageal mucin secretion in patients with grade II improved from 31% to 17% at the end of therapy, whereas in patients with grade III the impairment in mucin secretion improved only marginally from 71% to 69%. Significant impairment in the rate of esophageal mucin output in patients with severe esophagitis (grade III), prevailing despite healing of endoscopic changes, indicates that a low rate of esophageal mucin secretion may be a potential contributing factor in the development of severe mucosal damage in patients with excessive gastroesophageal reflux.This project had been partly supported by AGA Foundation/SmithKline Beecham Clinical Research Award and Jeffress Trust grant J-240.     

24-Hour esophageal pH monitoring before and after medical therapy for reflux esophagitis

Medical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease often results in improvement of symptoms. The purpose of this study was to determine if improvement in symptoms and endoscopic appearance after treatment was associated with a reduction in reflux, as measured with 24-hr pH recordings. Twenty patients with severe chronic reflux esophagitis participated in an eight-week double-blind trial of medical therapy with metoclopramide and cimetidine versus placebo and cimetidine. Significant symptom score improvement was noted in 11 patients. Eleven patients also had improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the esophageal mucosa, and eight of these patients had significant symptom improvement. Initial 24-hr pH recordings were abnormal in all patients, evidenced by an esophageal pH<4 during 20% of the study period. Improvement in 24-hr results was noted in only five patients—three with clinical and endoscopic improvement, and two with no improvement. In conclusion, there was no relationship between clinical improvement and the results of 24-hr pH recordings. Successful symptom relief and endoscopie healing of esophagitis during medical treatment may occur despite persistent reflux of gastric contents.This study was supported by grant RR00334 from the General Clinical Research Center Branch of the Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health.     

Assessment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: comparison of reflux scintigraphy with endoscopy biopsy and esophageal pH monitoring

In a study designed to evaluate reflux scintigraphy in 79 patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease, quantitated reflux scintigraphy was found to have predictive values of 73% in detecting reflux as judged by esophageal pH monitoring, of 63% in detecting esophagitis as judged by esophagoscopy and biopsy, and of 77% in detecting the presence of either esophagitis or reflux. However, its sensitivity was only 48, 58 and 42%, respectively. Gastro-esophageal reflux scanning has little value in the routine clinical diagnosis of mild to moderate gastroesophageal reflux disease, but none of the other tests (biopsy, endoscopic appearances of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring) were sufficiently specific to be taken as a sole diagnostic criterion ("gold standard"). Investigation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease could probably best be limited to endoscopy (especially to detect ulceration or metaplasia and to exclude neoplasia) with 24 hour pH monitoring in addition for those patients with suspected reflux disease but negative endoscopy.     

体质量对反流性食管炎患者下食管括约肌压力和24h食管pH监测结果的影响

目的探讨反流性食管炎（RE）患者中,体质量对下食管括约肌压力（LESP）和24h食管pH监测结果的影响。方法对18例体质量正常RE患者和22例超重肥胖RE患者进行LESP和24h食管pH监测,对结果进行统计分析。结果超重肥胖组RE患者的LESP、pH〈4总反流时问百分比、反流时间〉5min的反流次数、总反流数、DeMeester分与体质量正常组RE患者比较,差异均有统计学意义（P均〈0．05）;而超重肥胖组RE患者与体质量正常组RE患者的下食管括约肌松弛率（LESRR）比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论在RE患者中,超重肥胖可影响食管动力并增加食管的酸暴露,控制体质量对治疗RE可能有一定作用。     

食管运动功能在重度反流性食管炎中的地位

目的　通过对重度反流性食管炎(RE)治愈前后食管体部运动功能的研究,了解食管体部运动功能在重度RE中的地位。方法　对70例胃食管反流病患者进行食管压力测定。从中筛选23例重度RE(内镜诊断为洛杉矶C和D级食管炎);且24h食管内pH监测证实为病理性酸反流;食管压力测定证实有食管体部运动障碍患者。给予兰索拉唑30mg/d治疗3~6个月至内镜下食管炎完全愈合后,再行食管压力测定,观察下食管括约肌静息压(LESP)及食管体部运动功能的变化。以湿咽成功率、食管远端收缩波幅和食管蠕动的传导速度作为食管体部运动功能的指标。结果　食管炎治愈前后,LESP[ (6 00±0 86 )mmHg比(5 10±0 87)mmHg, 1kPa=7 5mmHg, P=0 476],食管远端收缩波幅[ (34 1±4 1)mmHg比(37 2±4 0)mmHg,P=0 593]、湿咽成功率[ (33 5±6 5)%比(38 6±7 1 )%,P=0 592 ]比较差异均无统计学意义,其均值仍显著低于正常对照组。结论　治愈食管炎并不能提高LESP及改善食管体部的运动功能。食管体部运动功能障碍和酸反流是RE的重要发病机制,尤其是重度RE。     

轻度反流性食管炎与非糜烂性反流病远端食管酸暴露和食管动力学变化

目的:探讨轻度反流性食管炎(RE)与非糜烂性反流病(NERD)食管远端酸暴露及食管动力变化特点.方法:符合洛杉矶诊断标准的RE30例(LA-A16例,LA-B14例),NERD16例,健康对照组10例被纳入本研究,所有患者及对照组均接受24h食管pH监测及压力测定,比较食管pH监测及测压结果.结果:LA-A组、LA-B组、NERD组DeMeester评分明显高于对照组,差异显著(P<0.05).LA-A组与NERD组比较DeMeester评分无明显差异,但NERD组的立位反流时间百分比与长反流周期数多于LA-A组,差异显著;LA-B组DeMeester评分比LA-A组和NERD组明显增高,LA-B组与LA-A组比较食管pH监测各项指标均存在明显差异.LA-A组、NERD组及对照组比较下食管括约肌静息压(LESP)、食管体部蠕动波幅度(PA)无显著差异,LA-A组和NERD组食管下段PA有增高趋势;LA-B组与LA-A组、NERD组及对照组比较LESP明显降低(P<0.05),LA-B组食管下段PA明显低于LA-A组(P<0.05).RE组无效食管运动(IEM)明显高于对照组,差异显著.结论:轻度RE(LA-B)与NERD远端食管酸暴露存在差异.DeMeester评分、LES功能不全及食管蠕动功能障碍与RE的严重程度呈正相关.LES功能不全及食管蠕动功能障碍可能不是轻度RE(LA-A)及NERD的主要致病因素.IEM与RE关系密切,且与RE有关的食管动力异常主要为IEM.     

Correlation of esophageal pH and motor abnormalities with endoscopic severity of reflux esophagitis

Motility abnormalities, common in gastroesophageal reflux disease, are likely to be related to endoscopic esophagitis. We studied pH and manometry parameters in relation to the severity of esophagitis. Forty-seven patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease for > 3 months were evaluated by: (i) endoscopy (grading of esophagitis by Savary-Miller classification); (ii) mucosal biopsy; (iii) manometry; and (iv) 24-h pH-metry. We found Savary-Miller's grades of: 0 (9 patients out of 47), I (16/47), II (16/47), III (4/47), IV (2/47). Distal esophageal contraction amplitude was lower in severe (grade II to IV) as compared with mild (grade 0 and I) esophagitis (49 [7-182] versus 83 [27-196] mmHg [P = 0.001]). The length and pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), duration and velocity of contraction in the body, number of episodes of reflux and long-duration reflux, longest reflux, median pH, per cent of time with pH < 4 and DeMeester scores were not significantly different between the two groups. The area under pH 4 showed a negative correlation with LES pressure and amplitude of distal esophageal contractions. We conclude that higher endoscopic grades of esophagitis are associated with lower amplitude of contraction in distal esophagus. Lower LES pressure and distal esophageal contraction amplitude are associated with greater area under curve for pH below 4.     

Postoperative reflux esophagitis with special reference to esophageal manometry and intraluminal pH recording

Journal of Gastroenterology -     

Healing of severe reflux esophagitis with PPI does not improve esophageal dysmotility

Esophageal dysmotility is frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of reflux esophagitis and esophageal dysmotility and evaluate the effect of prolonged treatment with proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole 30 mg/day) on esophageal motility in patients with severe reflux esophagitis associated with esophageal motility disorder. Twelve healthy subjects (HS) and 100 patients with reflux disease were involved in the study consisting of two parts: (i) comparison of esophageal motility in HS and patients with non-eroseive reflux disease (NERD), mild esophagitis and severe esophagitis; (ii) effect of 3-6 months lansoprazole therapy on esophageal motility in 23 patients with severe esophagitis, pathologic acid reflux and esophageal peristaltic dysfunction. Results included the following. (i) Esophageal dysmotility was noted in both patients with NERD and erosive GERD. (ii) Severe esophagitis was associated with severe esophageal dysmotility. (iii) Healing of severe esophagitis did not improve esophageal dysmotility. The resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 3.9 mmHg (range 1.7-20) before treatment and 4.8 mmHg (range 1.2-18.3) after esophagitis healing (P = 0.23, vs. before treatment), the amplitude of distal esophageal contraction was 28.8 mmHg (range 10.9-80.6) before treatment and 33.3 mmHg (range 10.0-72.5) after esophagitis healing (P = 0.59, vs. before treatment) and the frequency of failed peristalsis was 70% (range 0-100%) before treatment and 70% (range 0-100%) after esophagitis healing (P = 0.78, vs. before treatment). Both esophageal motility disorders and acid reflux play important roles in the mechanism of GERD, especially in severe esophagitis. Esophageal dysmotility is not secondary to acid reflux and esophagitis; it should be a primary motility disorder.     

食管通过时间诊断胃食管反流的意义

目的建立坐位食管通过时间（ＥＴＴ）正常参数，并观察反流性食管炎（ＲＥ）患者坐位ＥＴＴ的变化．方法健康志愿者４５例，ＲＥ患者２８例，分别用９９ｍＴｃＤＴＰＡ标记的蒸鸡蛋和牛奶测定坐位固体及液体食物ＥＴＴ．结果健康志愿者固体及液体食物ＥＴＴ分别是６９０ｓ±１７３ｓ及２４７ｓ±０５６ｓ，ＲＥ患者为１１５０ｓ±５７０ｓ及３１６ｓ±１２０ｓ．健康志愿者及ＲＥ患者固体食物ＥＴＴ有差异（Ｐ＜００５）．结论核素显像法测定ＥＴＴ简单准确，对评估食管功能有一定的临床意义．     

Laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis

AIM： To assess the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux （LPR） in patients with reflux esophagitis and disclose factors contributing to the development of LPR.
METHODS： A total of 167 patients who proved to have reflux esophagitis by endoscopy were enrolled. They received laryngoscopy to grade the reflux findings for the diagnosis of LPR. We used validated questionnaires to identify the presence of laryngopharyngeal symptoms, and stringent criteria of inclusion to increase the specificity of laryngoscopic findings. The data of patients were analyzed statistically to find out factors related to LPR.
RESULTS： The prevalence rate of LPR in studied subjects with reflux esophagitis was 23.9%. Age, hoarseness and hiatus hernia were factors significantly associated with LPR. In 23 patients with a hiatus hernia, the group with LPR was found to have a lower trend of esophagitis grading.
CONCLUSION： Laryngopharyngeal reflux is present in patients with reflux esophagitis, and three predicting factors were identified. However, the development of LPR might be different from that of reflux esophagitis. The importance of hiatus hernia deserves further study.