Learning to pop blisters in epidermolysis bullosa with a simple model

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a genetic disorder with skin fragility resulting in easy blistering of skin and mucous membranes. A plane of cleavage exists even where there is no visible blister, so new blisters should be drained as soon as possible to prevent their expansion. Although, learning how to drain blisters safely and painlessly without introducing infection is essential, it can be a major challenge, especially for new parents and children. To avoid demonstrating the technique directly on patient's skin, we have devised a simple teaching aid simulating a hand and forearm with multiple blisters, created with readily available materials. In our experience, we have found this low-cost model to be extremely useful to teach patients, families, and professional groups, how to drain EB blisters and it provides an effective, low-cost, painless substitute for real-life blisters, empowering parents and engaging children.     

Evaluation of an Avidin-Biotin-Peroxidase Method with a Monoclonal Antibody to Type IV Collagen in the Differential Diagnosis of Bullous Pemphigoid and Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita

There are reports in which an immunohistochemical technique with a monoclonal antibody to type IV collagen has been employed for differentiating between bullous pemphigoid (BP) and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA). The aim of this study was to determine whether this method could be used routinely. Biopsies (paraffin-embedded lesional skin containing a blister) from currently diagnosed patients with clinical features suggesting BP or EBA were examined by an avidin-biotin-peroxidase (ABC) technique. Sera were tested by indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin (IF) and immunoblotting (IB). In all cases which exhibited clear type IV collagen staining, the results of the ABC technique agreed with results of both IF and IB. In one confirmed EBA case, it was impossible to unequivocally localize type IV collagen, because it stained very faintly. Taking into consideration the results of our study, data indicating that the level of blistering might not coincide with the localization of immunoreactants in EBA cases and the possibility of an enzymatic destruction of lamina densa, we conclude that the ABC method is unsuitable for differentiation between BP and EBA.