Chronic Daily Headache in Children and Adolescents

SYNOPSIS
Recurrent headache is a relatively frequent problem in children and adolescents, with the majority of the research attention focused on pediatric migraine. This study assessed differences in consequences to headaches, coping with headaches, and associated disability in children and adolescents attending a headache clinic who were diagnosed with migraine, chronic daily headache, or carried both diagnoses. Results, generally indicated higher levels of impairment for patient's with chronic daily headaches. These patients were also more likely to use blaming others and wishful thinking as coping mechanisms. Gender and racial status interacted with headache diagnosis to predict parent response patterns and disability outcomes. The results provide initial support for the applicability of Martin's functional model of chronic headaches to a pediatric population.     

Chronic Daily Headache in Children and Adolescents: A 2-Year Prospective Study

Chronic daily headache in children and adolescents has not been well described. We analyzed data for 37 children and adolescents who presented with chronic daily headache to our Pediatric Headache Clinic over a 2-year period. These youngsters had five distinct headache patterns; 40% of them had the "comorbid" pattern, 35% were classified with new daily persistent headache, 15% with transformed migraine, 5% with chronic tension-type headache, and 5% could not be classified.
There were no significant differences by diagnosis in externalizing and internalizing behaviors, type A behaviors, disability, pain severity, days missed from school, and number of coping skills employed.
Children and adolescents with chronic daily headache have distinct clinical patterns, but for the most part, have similar disability. Differences between adult and childhood chronic daily headache are emphasized.     

Unilateral Chronic Daily Headache in Children

Unilateral chronic daily headache occurs in approximately 2% of adult patients, and often represents a trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia. We now describe the characteristics of 23 children who presented with a persistently unilateral chronic daily headache. The clinical features of our patients' headaches were primarily migrainous; however, the diagnosis of a trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia or a secondary headache disorder was frequently made.     

Chronic Daily Headache in Children and Adolescents:Current Status and Recommendations for the Future

The Pediatric Committee of the American Association for the Study of Headache was created in 1994 to develop a plan for comprehensively addressing global issues of headache in childhood. It was the impression of clinicians and researchers with an interest in childhood headaches that a clearer focus was needed to facilitate progress in the study and management of pediatric headache. It was further felt that approaches to treatment and outcomes, as well as assessment and classification schema for pediatric patients needed to be examined separately. The goal of the committee is to integrate anecdotal, clinical, and research expertise into a plan for addressing headaches in the pediatric population in the future. During the last 5 years, substantial attention has been devoted to chronic daily headache, primarily in adult populations. It is the purpose of this paper to review the literature of chronic daily headache in children, and propose areas for further exploration, given the recent emergence of interest in this diagnostic entity.     

Sleep and Chronic Daily Headache

Disorders of consciousness (DOCs) include coma, vegetative state (VS), and minimally conscious state (MCS). Coma is characterized by impaired wakefulness and consciousness, while VS and MCS are defined by lacking or discontinuous consciousness despite recovered wakefulness. Conversely, locked-in syndrome (LIS) is characterized by quadriplegia and lower cranial nerve paralysis with preserved consciousness. Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is a useful treatment to improve spasticity both in patients with DOCs and LIS. Moreover, it supports the recovery of consciousness in some patients with VS or MCS. The precise mechanism underlying this recovery has not yet been elucidated. It has been hypothesized that ITB may act by reducing the overload of dysfunctional sensory stimuli reaching the injured brain or by stabilizing the imbalanced circadian rhythms. Although the current indication of ITB is the management of severe spasticity, its potential use in speeding the recovery of consciousness merits further investigation.     

Obesity and Chronic Daily Headache

Obesity may be the greatest epidemic of modern times. It leads to diabetes and heart disease and shortens lifespan. Although not a risk factor for migraine, it is associated with an increased frequency and intensity of migraine. Obesity is also comorbid with chronic daily headache and is a major risk factor for chronification of episodic migraine in adults and children. Although obesity is not a factor in the effectiveness of migraine treatment, it does increase the peripheral and central events in migraine, ultimately increasing the neurologic potential for migraine. Although evidence suggests that obesity is a modifiable risk factor for migraine progression, it is unknown if weight loss is related to decrease in headache frequency. Recent surgical results suggest that this is true. We suggest all possible effective techniques aimed at weight loss be undertaken for migraineurs, especially obese migraineurs, and that carefully monitoring weight changes should be routinely done as part of their migraine care.     

Headache Diagnosis in Children and Adolescents

Purpose of Review

Headache phenotypes can differ between adults and children. While most headaches are due to primary headache disorders, in a small population, they can be an indication of a potentially life-threatening neurologic condition. The challenge lies in identifying warning signs that warrant further workup. This article reviews different types of pediatric headaches and headache evaluation in children and teens, and focuses on the approach for diagnosis of secondary headaches.

Recent Findings

Common thought is that increased frequency and severity of headache may reflect secondary pathology; however, headache phenotype may not be fully developed and can evolve in adolescence or adulthood. Headache location, particularly occipital headache alone, does not necessarily signify secondary intracranial pathology. Certain warning signs warrant neuroimaging, but others only warrant imaging in certain clinical contexts. Brain MRI is the neuroimaging modality of choice, though there is a high rate of incidental findings and often does not change headache management.

Summary

A stepwise approach is essential to avoid missing secondary headaches. There are several differences between adults and children in clinical manifestations of headache. Evaluation and diagnosis of pediatric headache starts with a thorough headache and medical history, family and social history, and identification of risk factors. A thorough physical and neurologic exam is important, with close attention to features that could suggest secondary headache pathology. Neuroimaging and other testing should only be performed if there is concern for secondary headache.

     

Chronic Daily Headache in the Elderly

Disabling headache disorders are ubiquitous in all age groups, including the elderly, yet they are under-recognized, underdiagnosed and undertreated worldwide. Surveys and clinic-based research reports on headache disorders in elderly populations are extremely limited in number. Chronic daily headache (CDH) is an important and growing subtype of primary headache disorders, associated with increased burden and disruption to quality of life. CDH can be divided into two forms, based on headache duration. Common forms of primary headache disorders of long duration (>4 hours) were comprehensively defined in the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3 beta). These include chronic migraine, chronic tension-type headache, new daily persistent headache, and hemicrania continua. Rarer short-duration (<4 hours) forms of CDH are chronic cluster headache, chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, SUNCT, and hypnic headache. Accurate diagnosis, management, and relief of the burden of CDH in the elderly population present numerous unique challenges as the “aging world” continues to grow. In order to implement appropriate coping strategies for the elderly, it is essential to establish the correct diagnosis at each step and to exercise caution in differentiating from secondary causes, while always taking into consideration the unique needs and limitations of the aged body.     

Headache and Subacute Sinusiris in Children and Adolescents

SYNOPSIS
The medical records of 150 children and adolescents with chronic headaches seen during 1984 and 1985 were reviewed. Sinus pathology diagnosed radiographically was present in 15 patients. None had prominent respiratory symptoms. All improved with appropriate therapy directed toward the sinus pathology. The importance of including sinusitis in the differential diagnosis when seeing children and adolescents with chronic headache is emphasized.     

Clinical Features of Chronic Daily Headache

Patients with chronic daily headaches are commonly encountered in headache specialty centers but their clinical characteristics have rarely been documented. We studied 100 consecutive patients with chronic daily headache to determine their presenting characteristics and other associated features. Half of the patients described their headache as a steady ache but throbbing pain was reported in about one third. About half estimated the degree of pain as moderate but one third claimed the typical pain was severe. A consistently unilateral site was noted in only 2 percent. Associated features characteristic of migraine were often noted: Including photophobia (37 percent), photophobia (42 percent), and nausea (24 percent). Many also reported aggravating and ameliorating factors commonly associated with migraine. We conclude that the manifestations of chronic daily headache are extremely diverse, probably reflecting the heterogeneous mechanisms which underlie this condition.     

Prevalence and Clinical Features of Chronic Daily Headache in a Headache Clinic

Although chronic daily headache is regarded as a syndrome encountered in headache clinics, clinical characteristics have only rarely been studied and the condition has not been documented in Thailand. To investigate the prevalence as well as clinical features of chronic daily headache in Thai patients, 220 patients visiting Chulalongkorn Headache Clinic were examined. Sixty cases (27.3%) were diagnosed as suffering from chronic daily headache (male to female ratio, 1:5.7).
The average age of these patients was 32.7 ± 9.6 years. Based on the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria, 30% of patients with chronic daily headache could be diagnosed as suffering from migraine end 36.7% from chronic tension-type headache, whereas the remainder had combined features of both headache types and were not classifiable. Diffuse steady pain was the most common headache type reported (65%), however, associated features characteristic of migraine were often noted. These included photophobia (70%), phonophobia (56.7%) and nausea (43%). Thirty-four cases (56.7%) reported that their headache could be aggravated by stress. Daily use of analgesics was reported in 58.3% of cases. We concluded that chronic daily headache is a common problem. Although the mechanism has not been fully clarified, the prevalence of associated psychological factors and analgesic overuse imply their involvement in the pathogenesis of this condition. The criteria of the IHS are not entirely suitable for diagnosis and classification of this disorder, and modification of this classification system is needed.     

Paroxetine in the Treatment of Chronic Daily Headache

SYNOPSIS
Forty-eight patients with chronic daily headache, unresponsive to several combinations of pharmacological treatments, were selected for an open-label study using paroxetine. Patients were given 10 mg to 50 mg of paroxetine for a period of 3 to 9 months. Ninety-two percent of the patients improved significantly, based on the patients' percent of the reduction in number of headache days per month. The common side effects were fatigue, insomnia, and urogenital disturbances. The possible mechanism of action of paroxetine in the treatment of chronic daily headache is discussed. Paroxetine appears to be effective in the treatment of chronic daily headache; however, double blind studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.     

Valproic Acid Treatment of Chronic Daily Headache

The efficacy of valproic acid in the treatment of intractable chronic daily headache, unresponsive to traditional prophylactic medications, was examined prospectively in 16 patients. Dosage of the medication was adjusted to maintain serum valproic acid levels between 50 and 100 μg/mL, provided there were no significant side effects at that level. Valproic acid prophylaxis was of some benefit in only 2 of 16 patients. One of these two patients discontinued therapy due to side effects. Eight of the 16 patients reported side effects which included nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, lethargy, sleepiness, confusion, blurred vision, and decreased libido. In conclusion, valproic acid was not effective in controlling chronic daily headache in the majority of patients in whom conventional therapy had failed, and 50% of patients reported side effects. There is a significant disparity in the reported efficacy of this drug in treating chronic daily headache. This disparity is most likely due to the poorly-defined nature of this variety of headache. It is, therefore, recommended that more stringent definition of this disorder be developed before therapeutic regimens are evaluated.     

Comprehensive Inpatient Treatment of Refractory Chronic Daily Headache

Objective.— (1) To assess outcome at discharge for a consecutive series of admissions to a comprehensive, multidisciplinary inpatient headache unit; (2) To identify outcome predictors. Background.— An evidence‐based assessment (2004) concluded that many refractory headache patients appear to benefit from inpatient treatment, underscoring the need for more research, including outcome predictors. Methods.— The authors completed a retrospective chart review of 283 consecutive admissions over 6 months. The inpatient program (mean length of stay = 13.0 days) included intravenous and oral medication protocols, drug withdrawal when indicated, cognitive‐behavior therapy, and other services when needed, including anesthesiological intervention. Patient‐reported pain levels and consensus of medical staff determined outcome status. Results.— The 267 completers (94%) included 212 women and 55 men (mean age = 40.3 years, range = 13‐74) from 43 states and Canada. The modal diagnosis was intractable, chronic daily headache (85%), predominantly migraine. Most (59%) had medication overuse headache (MOH), involving opioids (48%), triptans (16%), or butalbital‐containing analgesics (10%). Psychiatric diagnoses included stress‐related headache (82%), mood disorders (70%), anxiety disorders (49%), and personality disorders (PD, 26%). More patients with a PD (62%) had opioid‐related MOH than those with no PD (38%), P < .005. Of the completers, 78% had moderate to significant pain reduction, with comparable improvement in mood, function, and behavior. Clinical factors predicting moderate‐significant headache improvement were limited to MOH (84% vs 69%, P < .007) and presence of a PD (68% vs 81%, P < .03). Conclusions.— Most patients (78%) improved following aggressive, comprehensive inpatient treatment. Maintenance of improvement is likely to depend on multiple post‐discharge factors, including continuity of care, compliance, and home or work environment.     

IHS Criteria for Migraine and Tension-Type Headache in Children and Adolescents

We investigated the influence of age on the IHS criteria for migraine and tension-type headache in 437 consecutive children and adolescents and found the following age-associated statistically significant differences: migraine duration, occurrence of migraine aura, and bilateral location of tension-type headache were more often fulfilled by adolescents, whereas aggravation of headache by physical activity (in migrainous disorder) and photophobia (in migraine with aura) were more often fulfilled by children, Accordingly, there are only a few, differences concerning the fulfillment of the IHS criteria for migraine and tension-type headache in children and adolescents. Independent of age, the intensity of headache and the presence or absence of nausea are most important for differentiating the two major types of idiopathic headache. The sensitivity of the IHS criteria for migraine could be increased by reducing the minimum duration of migraine and by allowing the diagnosis of migraine when severe headache is associated with nausea, even though the criteria of location, quality, and aggravation by physical activity are not fulfilled.