Percutaneous coronary intervention compared with coronary artery bypass graft in coronary artery disease patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous reports of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft outcomes in coronary artery disease patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were inconsistent. We evaluated the optimal revascularization strategy for CKD patients. We searched Pub Med, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and scanned the references of relevant articles and reviews. All studies that compared relevant clinical outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft in CKD patients were selected. We defined short-term and long-term all-cause mortality as primary outcome, and long-term incidences of myocardial infarction and revascularization as secondary outcomes. A total of 2235 citations were retrieved, and 31 studies involving 99,054 patients, with 55,383 receiving percutaneous coronary intervention and 43,671 receiving coronary artery bypass graft, were included. In subgroup analyses of dialysis patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention with stents versus coronary artery bypass graft, CKD patients with multivessel coronary disease, and CKD patients receiving drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass graft, the pooled outcomes revealed that percutaneous coronary intervention possessed lower short-term mortality, but higher late revascularization risk. No significant differences in long-term mortality were observed between the two strategies in these subgroup analyses. In conclusion, in some specific clinical circumstances, CKD patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention possessed lower short-term all-cause mortality, but higher long-term revascularization risk, than coronary artery bypass graft; long-term all-cause mortality was not different between the two strategies.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with end-stage renal disease

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) represent a growing number of patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratories worldwide. This is a consequence of the growing absolute number of ESRD patients in developed countries, better noninvasive diagnostic tools, better catheterization facilities and last-but-not-least better education of referring physicians about the incidence and prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) for patients with ESRD. There is growing evidence of the positive impact of coronary revascularization on long-term outcome of these patients. ESRD patients have a high comorbidity and are therefore better candidates for the less invasive approach using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rather than coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). From the view of the interventional cardiologist, ESRD patients represent one of the most challenging patient cohort concerning technical challenges and potential risk of complication for the patient. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) including debulking techniques and stent implantation is the current standard therapy for patients with symptomatic single-vessel disease (SVD) and the preferred therapy for most patients with focal, polyfocal or even diffuse multi-vessel disease (MVD). Coronary bypass surgery is reserved for a decreasing number of patients with mechanically untreatable coronary lesions and unprotected left main stem stenosis. The problem of restenosis and subsequent target lesion revascularization has been decreased to a minimum by the use of drug-eluting stents (DES), even though prospective randomized trials including ESRD patients are lacking. In case of acute coronary syndromes, the need for immediate coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization by means of PCI should be pointed out.     

Coronary artery lesion distribution in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

PurposeTo determine the location of coronary atherosclerosis distribution observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using the database of cardiovascular medicine data from Saitama Sekishinkai Hospital to clarify the association between renal function and angiographic characteristics of coronary atherosclerosis. In total, 3268 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were included. Propensity score matching revised the total to 1772. The association of renal function with the location and/or distribution of coronary atherosclerosis lesions was then examined.ResultsOverall, coronary lesion was observed in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in 56% patients, whereas 28% and 22% were in the right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX), respectively. LAD was most affected and observed in 57% patients with stage 1 CKD. RCA was second-most affected, at 26% CKD stage 1, but it increased to 31%, 38%, and 59% in CKD 3, 4, and 5, respectively. In CKD 5 patients, the RCA was the most affected artery (59%), with 41% LAD lesions. Logistic regression analysis after propensity score matching showed that the odds ratios for an RCA lesion was 3.658 in CKD 5 (p = .025) compared with CKD 1 after adjusting for traditional risk factors.ConclusionThe prevalence of RCA lesions, but not LAD or LCX lesions, increased with increasing CKD stage. The pathophysiology of coronary atherosclerosis may differ by lesion location. Deterioration of renal function may affect progression of atherosclerosis more in the RCA than in the LAD or LCX.     

Risk of bleeding and restenosis among chronic kidney disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: Bleeding risk is increased in renal failure due to impaired platelet adhesiveness. Patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are given multiple antiplatelet agents that increase that risk. We retrospectively tested the hypothesis that chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who undergo PCI are at higher risk of bleeding and restenosis (due to chronic inflammation) compared to patients with normal renal function. METHODS: Patients who had PCI for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina between July 2001 and June 2003 (1,184 patients) were included in the study. All the patients were given periprocedural clopidogrel, aspirin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor if indicated, and then continued on clopidogrel and aspirin daily for 12 months. The patients were classified into 5 groups according to the CKD stage and followed-up for 12 months for development of major or minor bleeding, restenosis, length of hospital stay and survival. RESULTS: The incidence of major bleeding within the first month (3.4% in normal kidney function patients (Gp 1), 4.8% for CKD Stages 1 and 2 patients (Gp2), 5.2% for CKD Stage 3 patients (Gp3), 6.1% for CKD Stage 4 patients (Gp4) and 9.3% for CKD Stage 5 patients (Gp5), p = 0.001) and for minor bleeding (5.7% in Gp1, 6.5% for Gp2, 7.4% for Gp3, 9.2% for Gp4 and 11.3% for Gp5, p = 0.001) and the incidence of restenosis at one month (4.6% in Gp1, 5.3% for Gp2, 6.8% for Gp3, 7.3% for Gp4 and 9.6% for Gp5, p = 0.001) and 6 months (11.2% in Gp1, 13.5% for Gp2, 15.7% for Gp3, 16.4% for Gp4 and 19.7% for Gp5, p = 0.001) were higher with worsening CKD. Survival at one year was worse with worsening of the kidney function. CONCLUSION: Worsening of CKD is associated with progressively increased risk of minor and major bleeding, restenosis and death during and after PCI.     

Coronary revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease

There is a remarkable lack of randomized trial data on optimal management of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In fact, patients with CKD are often excluded from randomized trials that compare different treatment strategies for CAD. Because the most common cause of death in CKD patients is cardiovascular disease, it is crucial that studies are designed to determine the best therapy for CAD in this high-risk group. This article discusses the available data on coronary revascularization outcomes in CKD patients.     

Clinical features of chinese coronary heart disease patients with chronic kidney disease

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by stage in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and to identify the clinical features and examine control of cardiovascular risk factors. Methods and results: Clinical data of hospitalized patients were collected by investigators in China. CKD stages were classified according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A total of 2509 participants with CHD were included in the final statistical analysis. The overall prevalence of CKD stage 3 and greater (eGFR of less than 60?mL/min/1.73?m(2)) in the CHD patients was 32.5%. As the CKD stage increased, fasting blood glucose (FBG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP) levels all worsened. As the CKD stage became more severe, CHD patients had comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, periphery arterial disease, and ischemic stroke, and more CHD patients had triple vessel disease increased. Even when patients received treatment of CHD and risk factors, control of cardiovascular risk factors such as SBP, DBP, FBG, and low-density lipoprotein was worsened as CKD stage became more severe over a 6-week follow-up. Conclusions: The data suggested a high prevalence of CKD in Chinese patients with CHD. Many conventional risk factors and comorbidities were correlated with high prevalence of CKD in CHD patients. Control of cardiovascular risk factors in those patients was poor.     

维持性血液透析患者冠心病介入治疗

目的探讨维持性血液透析患者合并冠心病心脏介入治疗的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析本院7例血液透析合并冠心病患者在强化透析的基础上应用非离子型低渗造影剂行冠状动脉造影术＋支架植入术的临床资料。结果单支病变3例,多支病变4例,行经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术（PTCA）置放支架1～2个。死亡3例,病情改善4例。此4例术后心绞痛症状改善,肾功能无进一步恶化。结论血液透析患者中合并不稳定心绞痛患者可考虑冠状动脉介入治疗,疗效较好,但对于同时有心肌酶谱升高者预后不良。     

Management of heart failure and coronary artery disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major contributor to the mortality and morbidity of patients who suffer from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Heart failure and ischemic heart disease (IHD) are both highly prevalent in this population. The diagnosis of myocardial dysfunction is usually based on echocardiography. As in the general population, systolic dysfunction is treated with a combination of diuretics, renin-angiotensin system blockade, and beta-receptor antagonists. Diastolic dysfunction is best managed by eliminating the cause. Non-invasive tests for coronary artery disease (CAD) may be less reliable in patients with renal disease compared with nonuremic patients. Medical therapy of IHD in this population is generally similar to that for other patient groups, but surgical revascularization appears to carry a higher risk of complications with poorer clinical outcomes. The choice of revascularization procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) should be based on the specific coronary anatomy of a given patient as well as a consideration of other comorbid factors.     

Beta-blockers for coronary heart disease in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on whether the cardioprotective benefit of beta-blockers is modified by the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the data from the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study was performed. CKD was defined according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The Cox proportional hazard model, including adjustment for propensity score, was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) for the composite endpoint combining acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or sudden cardiac death (SCD). RESULTS: In this cohort of 3075 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, 568 (18.5%) had CKD and 1185 (38.5%) were treated with beta-blockers. A total of 245 (43.1%) CKD patients received beta-blockers at baseline. The mean (+/- SD) estimated GFR in the CKD and non-CKD subgroups was 55 (+/- 4) and 73 (+/- 9) mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, the crude incidence rates of AMI or SCD/1000 person years (PY) were 25.6, 21.9, 34.6 and 27.5 for the beta-blockers-/CKD-, beta-blockers+/CKD-, beta-blockers-/CKD+ and beta-blockers+/CKD+ groups, respectively. Compared to patients with beta-blockers-/CKD-, the adjusted HR of AMI or SCD was 0.87 (90% CI 0.71-1.06) for the beta-blockers+/CKD-, 1.35 (90% CI 1.05-1.73) for the beta-blockers-/CKD+ and 1.06 (90% CI 0.76-1.46) for the beta-blockers+/CKD+. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses suggest that the use of beta-blockers is associated with a reduction in event risk in patients with CHD regardless of the presence or absence of CKD.     

The exclusion of patients with chronic kidney disease from clinical trials in coronary artery disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a high risk of death from coronary artery disease and may modify the response to standard cardiovascular therapies. Treatment of subjects with CKD should ideally be based on evidence from randomized, clinical trials, but how often subjects with CKD have been excluded from these trials is uncertain. We undertook this study in order to quantify how often subjects with moderate to advanced CKD were excluded from large cardiovascular trials. MEDLINE and the reference list of selected articles were searched in order to identify large, randomized, controlled trials of five different coronary artery disease therapies published between 1998 and 2005. Exclusion criteria and reported clinical characteristics of subjects were abstracted. Rates of exclusion and reporting of baseline characteristics of study participants were compared for CKD, diabetes, history of smoking, and hypertension. Eighty-six trials randomizing 411 653 patients were identified. More than 80% of trials excluded subjects with end-stage renal disease and 75.0% excluded patients with CKD. Subjects with diabetes, hypertension, or a history of smoking were excluded less than 4% of the time. Baseline renal function of study participant was reported in only 7% of trials. Patients with CKD are frequently excluded from coronary artery disease trials and renal function of randomized subjects is rarely reported. These findings reinforce the notion that available data on the treatment of coronary artery disease in subjects with CKD have significant limitations and should be generalized to the treatment of subjects with CKD cautiously.     

Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with renal failure. Patients with chronic kidney disease have significant CVD, and carry a high cardiovascular burden by the time they commence renal replacement therapy (RRT). The severity of CVD that has been observed in dialysis patients lead to a growing body of research examining the pathogenesis and progression of CVD during the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (ie, predialysis phase). Multiple factors are involved in the development of CVD in CKD. More importantly, critical and key factors seem to develop early in the course of CKD, and result in preventable worsening of CVD in this patient population. Anemia is common in patients with CKD, and has been shown to have an independent role in the genesis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and subsequent CVD. Unfortunately, it is underdiagnosed and undertreated in patients with CKD. Early intervention, and better correction of anemia, seems to gain a great momentum in the prevention and management of CVD in CKD. Hypertension is another risk factor that has been targeted by the National Kidney Foundation Task Force on CVD in chronic kidney disease. This article reviews the different factors involved in the pathogenesis of CVD in CKD and the evidence supporting early and aggressive intervention.     

Impact of haemoglobin concentration and chronic kidney disease in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: A few recent studies suggested that anaemia has a marked impact on the survival of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, all of these analyses did not take into consideration that chronic kidney disease (CKD) plays an important role in erythropoiesis and anaemia. Therefore, we assessed in this study whether anaemia is an independent predictor of mortality or if its impact was confounded by CKD, which is known to have itself a marked impact on outcomes of patients with CHD. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we analysed 709 patients with symptomatic and significant CHD who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions. Patients were classified as anaemic using the WHO definition; renal function was classified by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS: In comparison with non-anaemic patients, anaemic patients had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (4.9 vs 0.5%, P<0.001). Moreover, 1-year mortality rates of anaemic patients were significantly higher regardless of whether they had a normal eGFR (22 vs 2.8%, P=0.029), an eGFR of 60-89 ml/min (14 vs 4.2%, P<0.001), an eGFR of 30-59 ml/min (21 vs 3.7%, P<0.001) or an eGFR<30 ml/min (26 vs 0%, NS). When cumulative mortality was analysed by haemoglobin concentrations in steps of 1 g/dl from <11.0 g/dl to >16.9 g/dl, 1-year mortality rates were 28, 18, 15, 5.5, 3.8, 5.7, 1.5 and 0%, respectively (P<0.001, log rank). Even after adjustment for comorbidities by multivariable Cox regression models, haemoglobin remained a significant predictor of long-term mortality (hazard rate ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-0.82, P<0.001) while eGFR was not (hazard rate ratio 1.0, 95% CI: 0.99-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Anaemia was found to be a strong and independent predictor of acute and long-term mortality in patients with symptomatic CHD, regardless of the presence of CKD.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with reduced ejection fraction

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate comparative outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with reduced ejection fraction.MethodsAll patients from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2011 to 2018 who had reduced preoperative ejection fraction (<50%) and underwent CABG or PCI for coronary revascularization were included in this study. Patients were risk-adjusted with propensity matching (1:1) and primary outcomes included long-term survival, readmission, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).ResultsA total of 2000 patients were included in the current study, consisting of CABG (n = 1553) and PCI (n = 447) cohorts with a mean ejection fraction of 35% ± 9.53%. Propensity matching yielded a 1:1 match with 324 patients in each cohort, controlling for all baseline characteristics. Thirty-day mortality was similar for PCI versus CABG (6.2% vs 4.9%; P = .49). Overall mortality over the study follow-up period (median, 3.23 years; range, 1.83-4.98 years) was significantly higher for the PCI cohort (37.4% vs 21.3%; P < .001). Total hospital readmissions (24.1% vs 12.9%; P = .001), cardiac readmissions (20.4% vs 11.1%; P = .001), myocardial infarction event (7.7% vs 1.8%; P = .001), MACCE (41.4% vs 23.8%; P < .001), and repeat revascularization (6.5% vs 2.6%; P = .02) occurred more frequently in the PCI cohort. Freedom from MACCE at 1 year (74.4% vs 87.0%; P < .001) and 5 years (54.5% vs 74.0%; P < .001) was significantly lower for the PCI cohort. On multivariable cox regression analysis, CABG (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.73; P < .001) was significantly associated with improved survival. Prior liver disease, dialysis, diabetes, and peripheral artery disease were the most significant predictors of mortality. The cumulative incidence of hospital readmission was lower for the CABG cohort (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.71; P < .001). Multivariable cox regression for MACCE (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.58; P < .001) showed significantly fewer events for the CABG cohort.ConclusionsPatients with reduced ejection fraction who underwent CABG had significantly improved survival, lower MACCE, and fewer repeat revascularization procedures compared with patients who underwent PCI.     

Pseudoexfoliation syndrome in chronic kidney disease patients

Abstract

This study was performed to determine whether chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of pseudoexfoliation (PEX) syndrome. This is an age-matched case control study evaluating frequency of PEX in patients over age 40 with the diagnosis of stage 1–4 CKD and those undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Subjects over age 40 with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) and normal kidney functions were studied as a control group. CKD was diagnosed as decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 60?mL/min/1.73?m² for at least 3 months. Study groups were arranged as group 1 consisting of HD receiving CKD patients, group 2 consisting of CKD patients who do not need HD and group 3 as a control. Demographic properties and the prevalence of PEX were evaluated and compared between groups. Because of the effect of DM on PEX occurrence, it was also evaluated after exclusion of diabetic patients. A total of 101 cases in group 1, 106 cases in group 2 and 117 cases in group 3 were included in the study. Pseudoexfoliation was found in 7 (6.9%) patients in group 1, 5 (4.7%) patients in group 2 and 7 (5.9%) patients in group 3 (p?>?0.05). After exclusion of diabetic patients the prevalence of PEX changed as 4 (5.6%) in group 1, 2 (4.4%) in group 2 and 1 (1.8%) in group 3 (p?>?0.05). In conclusion, CKD was not associated with increased prevalence of PEX in this study.     

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

Background

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have worse adverse cardiovascular outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the adverse cardiovascular outcomes between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) in these patients have been a subject of debate.

Methods

We undertook a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database to identify all relevant studies comparing techniques between OPCAB and ONCAB in CKD patients. We pooled the odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) from individual studies and conducted heterogeneity, quality assessment, and publication bias analyses.

Results

This meta-analysis includes 17 studies with 201,889 patients. In CKD patients, OPCAB was associated with significantly lower early mortality as compared to ONCAB (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82–0.93; p < 0.0001). OPCAB was associated with decreased risk of atrial fibrillation (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.34–0.97; p = 0.04), cerebrovascular accident (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.22–0.95; p = 0.04), blood transfusion (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.08–0.49; p = 0.0005), pneumonia, prolonged ventilation, and shorter hospital stays. No difference was found regarding long-term survival (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.86–1.36; p = 0.51) or myocardial infarction (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.30–1.38; p = 0.26).

Conclusions

Compared with ONCAB, OPCAB is associated with superior postoperative morbidity and the early mortality in CKD patients. Long-term survival is comparable between the two surgical revascularizations.

     

Location of acute coronary artery thromboses in patients with and without chronic kidney disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease have high rates of myocardial infarction and death following an initial attack. Proximal location of coronary atherosclerotic lesions has been linked to the risk of acute myocardial infarction and to infarction-associated mortality. To examine if the spatial distribution of lesions differs in patients with and without chronic kidney disease, we used quantitative coronary angiography to measure this in patients with acute coronary thromboses who were having angiography following acute myocardial infarction. Multivariable linear regression was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Among 82 patients with stage 3 or higher chronic kidney disease, 55.6% of lesions were located within 30 mm and 87.7% were within 50 mm of the coronary ostia. This compared to 34.7 and 71.8%, respectively, among 299 patients without significant kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease was independently and significantly associated with a 7.0 mm decrease in the distance from the coronary ostia to the problem lesion. Our study suggests that a causal link between a more proximal culprit lesion location in patients with chronic kidney disease and their high mortality rates after myocardial infarct is possible and may have important implications for interventions to prevent infarction.