Closure devices and vascular complications among percutaneous coronary intervention patients receiving enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and clopidogrel.

The objectives of this study were to explore the rate of vascular complications using closure devices (CDs) vs. manual compression (MC) among percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients receiving enoxaparin, clopidogrel, aspirin, and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The Evaluating Enoxaparin Clotting Times (ELECT) study enrolled patients receiving enoxaparin, clopidogrel, and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors when necessary. Any approved CD or MC was allowed post-PCI, and clinical outcome data were prospectively collected. Four hundred forty-five patients had anti-Xa levels measured by a core laboratory and by a novel point-of-care device that reports ENOX times. All received enoxaparin, aspirin, and clopidogrel, and 75% received a concomitant GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Major and minor bleeding were defined according to TIMI criteria. "Any bleeding" included the occurrence of access site complications including hematoma, significant rebleeding, or bleeding delaying hospital discharge. TIMI major plus minor bleeding occurred in 1.5% of the patients who received CD vs. 1.8% of patients with MC (P = 0.83). Any bleeding occurred in 12.2% of CD vs. 5.7% MC (P = 0.02), and in 9.5% of patients receiving GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor vs. 2.8% (P = 0.01) among those who did not. For patients receiving both a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and CD, any bleeding was observed in 13.7% vs. 3.4% (P = 0.006) among patients who received neither. While minor and major TIMI bleeding remained very low in both groups, CD was associated with a twofold increase in risk of any-bleeding event when compared to MC, especially when using GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

The combination of enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and an early invasive approach among acute coronary syndrome patients

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the feasibility and safety of enoxaparin in combination with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as part of an early invasive strategy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: Trials in patients with ACS have evaluated the utility of enoxaparin, adjuvant GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors with PCI, and an early invasive approach. Information about the combination of all three of these approaches, however, is limited. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with ACS underwent cardiac catheterization, of whom 23 underwent PCI with enoxaparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the study, a composite of death, myocardial infarction or urgent revascularization at 30 days, occurred in 8% of patients undergoing PCI. There were no deaths. One patient received a blood transfusion. No other adverse events occurred. These event rates were comparable to those from the pooled EPILOG/EPISTENT database, in which intravenous unfractionated heparin was used in conjunction with GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. The mean anti-Xa level in patients undergoing PCI was 0.74 0.48 U/ml. The majority of patients who underwent PCI within eight hours of their last dose of enoxaparin had therapeutic anti-Xa levels. CONCLUSION: In patients with ACS, enoxaparin in combination with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and an early invasive approach resulted in comparable clinical complication and bleeding rates versus historical references utilizing unfractionated heparin.     

A propensity analysis of the impact of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy on in-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention

It is unknown whether the benefits of parenteral platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) demonstrated in randomized clinical trials extend to patients treated outside the setting of clinical trials. A contemporary registry of 10,847 consecutive PCI procedures was analyzed to determine the effect of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment on in-hospital major adverse coronary events ([MACEs] composite of death, urgent coronary artery bypass surgery, periprocedural myocardial infarction, abrupt closure, and stent thrombosis). In this registry, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered to 20.1% of patients. These patients were younger, more often men, and less often hypertensive than untreated patients. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor-treated patients were more likely to present with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Stents were placed in 79% of patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. MACEs occurred in 7.8% of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor-treated patients compared with 3.8% of untreated patients (p <0.001). After multivariable adjustment for the propensity of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment as well as other possible confounders and interactions known to influence MACEs, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment was associated with a 57% increase in the risk of a MACE (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.03; p = 0.0004). In a data set consisting of patients with a high degree of acuity predominantly treated with stent placement, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment is associated with an increase in thrombotic complications of PCI.     

Timing of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use and outcomes among patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (results from CRUSADE)

Although glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are recommended for patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines do not specify optimal timing for their initiation. We compared patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in 30,830 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction included in the CRUSADE initiative (January 2001 to December 2004) who underwent PCI with upstream (>1 hour before PCI) or periprocedural use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered upstream in 43% of patients versus periprocedurally in 57%. Time from arrival to PCI was longer for patients who received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors upstream (median 25.6 hours) compared with periprocedurally (18.2 hours). Unadjusted incidence of in-hospital death or reinfarction was lower with upstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (3.8% vs 4.3%, p = 0.046), but after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, this difference was not statistically significant. Treatment with upstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors was associated with a lower incidence of unadjusted death or reinfarction in patients who underwent PCI <12 hours from hospital arrival. In conclusion, in this observational analysis, overall ischemic outcomes were similar between the 2 groups, but clinical trials are needed to solve the controversy over optional timing of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use.     

Bivalirudin in PCI: an overview of the REPLACE-2 trial

The Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial is one of the largest acute randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of two anticoagulant strategies during contemporary urgent or elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin, with provisional use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) inhibitor was compared to low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus planned GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. At 30-day follow-up, the primary quadruple composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent repeat revascularization, or in-hospital major bleeding) occurred in 9.2% of patients in the bivalirudin group versus 10.0% of patients in the UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor group. The secondary triple composite endpoint (death, MI, urgent repeat revascularization) occurred in 7.6% of patients in the bivalirudin group compared with 7.1% of patients in the UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor group. Both endpoints met formal statistical criteria for noninferiority to UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. By imputed comparison from historic GP IIb/IIIa trials between bivalirudin versus UFH alone, REPLACE-2 demonstrated that bivalirudin was superior to UFH alone with respect to the quadruple and triple composite endpoints. Furthermore, bivalirudin plus provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital bleeding (2.4% vs. 4.1%; p < 0.001). At 6 months' follow-up, there was no significant difference in rates of death, MI, or revascularization between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the early, nonsignificant 0.5% excess non-Q-wave MI in the bivalirudin group translated into later mortality. There was a trend toward decreased mortality at 6 months in the bivalirudin arm (0.95% vs. 1.35%; p = 0.148). The relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was similar in several high-risk subgroups, including patients with diabetes mellitus or prior MI, women, the elderly (age > 65 years), and patients undergoing PCI of bypass grafts. Bivalirudin represents an exciting alternative to UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients undergoing urgent and elective PCI with similar suppression of ischemic events, fewer bleeding complications, and the potential for greater cost savings and ease of administration.     

Combining enoxaparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: final results of the National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin-3 (NICE-3) study

Background

In high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), there have been concerns relating to the safety of using low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in combination with a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist, and the continued use of LMWH in patients brought to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

The National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin-3 (NICE-3) study was an open-label observational study of enoxaparin in combination with any 1 of 3 available GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation ACS. The primary end point was the incidence of major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Data were also recorded on the incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent revascularization for repeat ischemia.

Results

A total of 671 patients with validated data were treated with enoxaparin; 628 of these patients also received a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist (tirofiban, n = 229; eptifibatide, n = 272; abciximab, n = 127); 283 of 628 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The 30-day incidence of non-CABG major bleeding was 1.9%, and was not significantly higher than a prespecified historical control rate of 2.0%. Outcome events included death (1.0% at hospital discharge and 1.6% at 30 days), MI (3.5% and 5.1%, respectively), and urgent revascularization (2.7% and 6.8%, respectively).

Conclusions

The safety of enoxaparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist was comparable to that of unfractionated heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist, as reported in other recent major trials. Patients undergoing PCI can be safely managed with enoxaparin and a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist, without supplemental use of unfractionated heparin.     

Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing an invasive strategy: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Objective

This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background

Pharmacotherapy for patients undergoing PCI includes bivalirudin, heparin, and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We sought to compare ischemic and bleeding outcomes with bivalirudin versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing PCI.

Methods

A literature search was conducted to identify fully published randomized trials that compared bivalirudin with heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing PCI.

Results

A total of 19,772 patients in 5 clinical trials were included in the analysis (9785 patients received bivalirudin and 9987 patients received heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors during PCI). Anticoagulation with bivalirudin, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, results in no difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 1.19), death (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.21), or urgent revascularization (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.30). There is a trend towards a higher risk of myocardial infarction (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.28) but a significantly lower risk of TIMI major bleeding with bivalirudin (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.69).

Conclusion

In patients who undergo PCI, anticoagulation with bivalirudin as compared with unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors results in similar ischemic adverse events but a reduction in major bleeding.     

Anticoagulation with bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective analysis of high-risk patients treated with bivalirudin during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) without concomitant glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibition. BACKGROUND: Reperfusion by PCI is the treatment of choice for patients with STEMI. In patients with stable or unstable angina without ST-segment elevation undergoing PCI, bivalirudin was at least as effective as heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in reducing ischemic events and more effective in preventing bleeding. There are no published studies detailing the use of bivalirudin in patients with STEMI. METHODS: From 09/02 to 05/03 at the Heart Care Centers of Illinois, Blue Island, Illinois. Ninety-one consecutive patients with STEMI underwent PCI with or without stent placement. Bivalirudin was administered as a bolus dose (0.75 mg/kg) followed by infusion (1.75 mg/kg/hr) for the duration of the procedure. Outcomes were recorded over a 30-day follow-up period. RESULTS: Patients (n = 91) had several high-risk characteristics (40% female, 30% diabetes mellitus, 21% previous MI and 18% cardiogenic shock). PCI procedures utilized balloons, stents, or a combination of both. Intraaortic balloon pumps were used for 41% and closure devices for 24% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation demonstrates excellent TIMI flow without the addition of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. The low mortality and complication rates suggest anticoagulation with bivalirudin in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI is feasible and warrants further study in larger controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of bivalirudin in this patient population.     

Angiographic and clinical outcomes of bivalirudin versus heparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: Heparin with adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor (GP IIb/IIIa) inhibitors has demonstrated its effectiveness in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has recently been shown to be an effective alternative for patients undergoing elective PCI. OBJECTIVES: To assess the angiographic and clinical outcomes of adjunctive pharmacological strategies in a high-risk population presenting with ACS. METHODS: Of 891 consecutive PCI patients with ACS, 304 received bivalirudin (60.5% male, 68+/-11 years) and were compared with 283 who received heparin (58.7% male, 66+/-12 years). A 30-day major adverse cardiac event was defined as the occurrence of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization or major hemorrhage. RESULTS: Adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 14.1% of the bivalirudin group and in 72.4% of the heparin group (P<0.010). The occurrence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow less than grade 3 was lower and the achievement of angiographic success was higher in the bivalirudin group than in the heparin group (5.2% versus 8.2%, 94.7% versus 89.7%, P=0.039 and P<0.010, respectively). There was no difference between groups in the incidence of bleeding events (bivalirudin 2.0% versus heparin 3.5%, P not significant) and in 30-day major adverse cardiac events (bivalirudin 8.3% versus heparin 5.7%, P=0.223). CONCLUSIONS: In the high-risk cohort undergoing PCI, bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors achieved better angiographic results. Although not powered to show a difference, and while acknowledging that a selection bias could have affected the data, the present study showed that bivalirudin may be as clinically effective and safe as heparin with adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

Debate of adjunctive pharmacology for percutaneous coronary intervention: anticoagulation and clopidogrel are not (always) enough

Substantial controversy exists regarding the optimal pharmacologic cocktail for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The most common approach typically includes aspirin, clopidogrel, unfractionated heparin (or enoxaparin), and (variably) a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Some substitute bivalirudin with "bail-out" GP IIb/IIIa blockade for heparin and planned GP IIb/IIIa integrin blockade, an approach that necessarily includes aspirin and clopidogrel (for their antiplatelet effects). These shifts in adjunctive treatment paradigms should be examined in the context of available data from clinical studies. Several studies have demonstrated the phenomenon of clopidogrel resistance to be fairly prevalent; even in clopidogrel-responsive patients, steady state is achieved only 4-6 hours after a 600-mg loading dose. It would thus be anticipated that clopidogrel-resistant patients would benefit from GP IIb/IIIa blockade, particularly during the period immediately after intervention. Neither REPLACE-2 nor the recent ACUITY trial demonstrated an efficacy advantage for bivalirudin as a substitute for heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa blockade; instead, any advantage appears to be limited to reducing the propensity for bleeding. As bleeding is directly correlated with the degree of anticoagulation and is further augmented by GP IIb/IIIa blockade, an alternative to the bivalirudin strategy is to simply reduce the amount of heparin anticoagulation during PCI. Finally, the benefit-to-risk ratio of aggressive adjunctive antiplatelet/antithrombotic therapy might be further improved via risk stratification, with patients at higher risk for periprocedural events receiving intensive therapy and lower-risk patients being managed with less intensive regimens focused on minimizing the risk of bleeding.     

Use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention and clinical outcomes

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are widely used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies have suggested that they do not offer benefit in saphenous vein graft PCI. Nonetheless, their use remains widespread during vein graft angioplasty. We retrospectively analyzed 1,537 patients who underwent saphenous vein graft PCI. Patients who received a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n = 941) were compared with those who did not receive any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n = 596). The primary end point was myonecrosis after PCI (creatine kinase-MB level >3 times the upper reference limit). The incidence of myonecrosis after PCI was similar between the group that received GP IIb/IIIa and the group that did not (odds ratio for GP IIb/IIIa use 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 2.00, p = 0.07). Propensity-adjusted analysis demonstrated no significant difference in myonecrosis after PCI, in-hospital mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or bleeding (blood transfusion, retroperitoneal bleed, or hematoma) between the 2 groups. In an analysis restricted to patients who were treated with an emboli protection device, GP IIb/IIIa use was not associated with decreased myonecrosis after PCI (this was also the case for patients who were not treated with an emboli protection device). Unadjusted survival (mean follow-up 5.5 +/- 0.1 years) was similar between the group that received GP IIb/IIIa and the group that did not (log-rank test, p = 0.89). There was no difference in survival after adjusting for the propensity to receive a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (adjusted odds ratio for GP IIb/IIIa use 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.23, p = 0.59). In conclusion, adjunctive use of platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in saphenous vein graft PCI does not appear to be associated with less myonecrosis or improved survival.     

The activated clotting time (ACT) can be used to monitor enoxaparin and dalteparin after intravenous administration

BACKGROUND: The use of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been limited by the presumed inability to monitor its anticoagulant effect using bedside assays. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the dose-response of enoxaparin, dalteparin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the activated clotting time (ACT), and to determine whether the ACT or aPTT can be used to monitor intravenous (IV) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). METHODS: A total of 130 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were assigned to intravenous enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg, dalteparin 50 international units/kg or UFH 50 units/kg. Of the 130 patients, 46 (35%) underwent PCI, all of whom received a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. We measured ACT, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and plasma anti-Xa levels after serial sampling. RESULTS: Both enoxaparin and dalteparin induced a significant rise in the ACT and aPTT, with an ACT dose-response approximately one-half the magnitude of that obtained using UFH. The time course of changes in the ACT and aPTT after administration of enoxaparin and dalteparin was virtually identical, with a return to baseline at approximately 2 hours. The enoxaparin and dalteparin-treated patients successfully underwent PCI with no major hemorrhagic complications. CONCLUSIONS: The ACT is equally sensitive to IV enoxaparin and dalteparin. These data support an ACT-guided strategy for intravenously administered LMWH during PCI. Additional studies with larger patient populations may be indicated to determine the ideal target ACT for LMWH in PCI.     

Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: a REPLACE-2 substudy

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess if clopidogrel pretreatment affects the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). BACKGROUND: Although thienopyridine pretreatment may improve clinical outcomes with PCI, it is unknown if bivalirudin's efficacy compared with heparin is dependent upon such pretreatment. METHODS: The Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial was a double-blind, triple-dummy, randomized-controlled trial comparing heparin plus routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade (heparin group) with bivalirudin plus provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade (bivalirudin group) during PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization at 30 days, and major in-hospital bleeding. The secondary end point was a 30-day composite of death, MI, and urgent revascularization. Clopidogrel pretreatment was encouraged (300 mg loading, 75 mg/day). RESULTS: Of 6,010 patients enrolled, 5,893 received clopidogrel, with 85.8% in the bivalirudin and 84.6% in the heparin group receiving clopidogrel pretreatment. Bivalirudin (provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade 7.2%) was noninferior to the heparin group for both primary and secondary end points. Clopidogrel pretreatment did not affect the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with GP IIb/IIIa blockade, irrespective of pretreatment duration. Pretreatment was associated with significantly lower primary end point with bivalirudin (8.7% pretreatment vs. 12.9% no pretreatment, p = 0.007), and nonsignificantly with heparin (9.7% vs. 11.7%, respectively, p = 0.20). Multivariable models showed a trend toward lower primary and secondary end points with clopidogrel pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel pretreatment at the doses and time administered in this trial did not influence the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa blockade for PCI. However, pretreatment was associated with a trend towards lower clinical events after PCI.     

The impact of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients

The use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI) is still a matter of debate. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary PCI and were concomitantly treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors with those who were not treated with these drugs. Between January 1996 and November 2003, a total of 418 consecutive patients underwent PCI in the setting of ST-segment elevation AMI. At the operator's discretion, 287 patients were concomitantly treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and 115 patients were not. Angiographic success and final TIMI 3 flow in the infarct-related artery was achieved more frequently in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (90% vs. 77%; p=0.001). The in-hospital composite endpoint of death, reinfarction and bleeding complications was significantly better in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (4% vs. 12%; p=0.005). Furthermore, the adjusted 12-month survival rate was significantly better in these patients (RR: 2.99, CI: 1.29-6.9; p=0.01). Therefore, adjunctive therapy with GP IIbIIIa inhibitors during primary PCI is associated with improved short-term outcomes and one-year survival without an increased risk of bleeding.     

Antiplatelet Strategies: Evaluating Their Current Role in the Setting of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Numerous clinical trials have established the value of antiplatelet therapies for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aspirin (ASA), thienopyridines (i.e., clopidogrel and ticlopidine) and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists comprise the major classes of antiplatelet therapies demonstrated to be of benefit in the treatment of ACS and for the prevention of thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is beneficial when administered before and after PCI, and is more effective when combined with either ASA or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing post‐PCI complications, coronary subacute stent thrombosis, and thrombotic events in general. It is currently unclear whether a higher loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) is better than the standard loading dose (300 mg), how long therapy should continue, and which maintenance dose is optimal. The role of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in ACS is less clear due to conflicting data from several studies with different patient populations. Currently, it appears that the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might be most beneficial in high‐risk ACS patients scheduled to undergo PCI, who demonstrate non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and elevated troponin levels. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the REPLACE-2 trial

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the cost of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using bivalirudin with provisional platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibition with that of heparin + routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. BACKGROUND: Although GP IIb/IIIa inhibition has been shown to reduce ischemic complications in a broad range of patients undergoing PCI, many patients currently do not receive such therapy because of concerns about bleeding complications or cost. Recently, bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibition has been validated as an alternative to heparin + routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition for patients undergoing PCI. However, the cost-effectiveness of this novel strategy is unknown. METHODS: In the Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial, 4,651 U.S. patients undergoing non-emergent PCI were randomized to receive bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa (n = 2,319) versus heparin + routine GP IIb/IIIa (n = 2,332). Resource utilization data were collected prospectively through 30-day follow-up on all U.S. patients. Medical care costs were estimated using standard methods including bottom-up accounting (for procedural costs), the Medicare fee schedule (for physician services), hospital billing data (for 2,821 of 4,862 admissions), and regression-based approaches for the remaining hospitalizations. RESULTS: Among the bivalirudin group, 7.7% required provisional GP IIb/IIIa. Thirty-day ischemic outcomes including death or myocardial infarction were similar for the bivalirudin and GP IIb/IIIa groups, but bivalirudin resulted in lower rates of major bleeding (2.8% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.002) and minor bleeding (15.1% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001). Compared with routine GP IIb/IIIa, in-hospital and 30-day costs were reduced by $405 (95% confidence interval [CI] $37 to $773) and $374 (95% CI $61 to $688) per patient with bivalirudin (p < 0.001 for both). Regression modeling demonstrated that, in addition to the costs of the anticoagulants themselves, hospital savings were due primarily to reductions in major bleeding (cost savings = $107/patient), minor bleeding ($52/patient), and thrombocytopenia ($47/patient). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with heparin + routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition, bivalirudin + provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibition resulted in similar acute ischemic events and cost savings of $375 to $400/patient depending on the analytic perspective.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been extensively studied in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in the management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. However, the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors is less well established in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). Multiple nonrandomized studies suggest that combination therapy with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombolytic agents leads to increased rates of TIMI 3 flow. However, two clinical trials involving over 22,000 patients demonstrated that combination therapy is associated with only modest reductions in major adverse cardiac events, does not reduce mortality, and is associated with an increase in bleeding. In the setting of primary PCI, four clinical trials involving over 3,000 patients demonstrated that GP IIb/IIIa inhibition results in a significant decrease in the need for urgent target vessel revascularization but not in reductions of death or recurrent MI. Thus, GP IIb/IIIa inhibition may provide only limited benefits in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation MI.     

Combination Enoxaparin and Abciximab During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A New Standard of Care?

Evidence from randomized trials supports the administration of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade both to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those presenting with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Similarly, the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin, has demonstrated superior efficacy when compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of patients with non-ST elevation ACS. Algorithms for seamless integration of pharmacotherpy through the course of hospitalization for patients who present with ACS and who require PCI will likely combine therapy with enoxaparin and platelet GP IIb/IIIa blockade (abciximab). Our preliminary experience with combination enoxaparin and abciximab as adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI suggests that this strategy is safe and effective and may offer advantages over a conventional strategy, which employs UFH.     

Bleeding risk of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in broad-based practice (results from the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Registry)

Randomized trials of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have shown a modest increase in bleeding risk associated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. Because clinical trials often enroll highly selected patient populations and are performed in high-volume experienced centers, these results may not apply to a nonclinical trial population, thus altering the risk-benefit ratio of the drugs. Given the widespread use of these agents, we sought to determine bleeding risks in a broad-based population of patients who underwent PCI. We performed a retrospective cohort study of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and bleeding in 18,821 procedures from June 1, 1996 to December 31, 1998 using the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Registry. The primary outcome was bleeding events, defined as clinically significant hematoma formation or hemorrhage. Bleeding risk was 1.9% in the 2,525 patients who received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors compared with 1.0% in the 16,296 who did not (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35 to 2.59, p <0.001). After adjustment for multiple clinical and procedural variables, the effect was attenuated, with at most a twofold bleeding risk associated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.03, p = 0.083). The small increase in absolute risk of bleeding from GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use in this study is similar to the risk observed in clinical trials. Assuming these agents are as effective as shown in these trials, the risk-benefit ratio of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in broad-based PCI practice should be favorable.     

Antithrombotic therapy in the acute phase of unstable angina

Low molecular weight heparins appear to be a better choice in patients with unstable angina than unfractionated heparin. In addition, the excellent predictable dose-response makes them suitable to prevent ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention. Although direct comparisons between LMWH and UH are limited, substantial evidence exists that patients receiving LMWH can be safely brought to cardiac catheterization. Therefore, previous concern regarding transitioning such therapy from the medical service to the cardiac catheterization laboratory should not impede the upstream use of thèse agents. Although UH remains an option in conjunction with GP IIB/IIIa inhibitors, there is substantial evidence that LMWH and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy can be used safely in combination. Although GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are very potent to prevent ischemic events after percutaneous coronary interventions, their benefit in the medical management of unstable angina is much more modest. ADP receptor antagonists reduce major ischemic events in combination with aspirin in the medical management of unstable angina patients but also when PCI is planned. Their combination with GP IIB/IIIa receptor antagonist does not impair the benefit of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. The development of biologic tools to monitor these antithrombotic regimen is highly warranted especially in high risk patients (chronic renal failure, elderly).