Prognosis of breast cancer patients treated with sentinel node biopsy in Japan

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy predicts accurate pathological nodal staging. The survival of node-negative breast cancer patients should be evaluated between the patients treated with sentinel node biopsy alone and those treated with axillary lymph node dissection. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with negative axillary nodes underwent sentinel node biopsy immediately followed by axillary lymph node dissection between January 1998 and June 1999 (the ALND group). Since then, if sentinel lymph nodes were negative on the frozen-section diagnosis, 112 patients underwent sentinel node biopsy alone without axillary lymph node dissection between July 1999 and December 2000 (the SNB group). We retrospectively observed the outcome of the two study groups. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52 months in all patients. Relapse-free survival rates at 3 years in the ALND and SNB groups were 94% and 93%, respectively. Five of the 112 patients in the SNB group had overt axillary metastases. Three of them with axillary metastases alone were treated with delayed axillary lymph node dissection. These three patients have been free of other events for 3 years after local salvage treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node biopsy will emerge as a standard method to diagnose axillary nodal staging for clinically node-negative breast cancer patients.     

Breast lymphedema after breast conserving treatment

The authors aimed to evaluate breast lymphedema after breast conserving therapy (BCT) and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) or axillary clearance (AC). Fifty-seven breast cancer patients with BCT underwent SNB only and 103 underwent AC (57 with tumor negative and 46 with positive axillary nodes). Clinical examination and breast ultrasonography (US) were performed one year after surgery. Clinical examination revealed breast edema in 48% of patients in the AC node positive group, in 35% in the AC node negative group, and in 23% in the SNB group (p<0.05 between SNB and AC node positive). US revealed subcutaneous edema in the operated breast in 69-70% of the patients in the AC groups and in 28% in the SNB group (p=0.001-0.0001 between the SNB and the AC groups). Breast lymphedema was less common one year after BCT in patients with SNB only than in those with more extensive axillary treatment.     

Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer has a greater node positivity rate than axillary node sample: Results from a retrospective analysis

Background

Sentinel node biopsy as a surgical method of axillary staging for early breast cancer has been widely accepted as an alternative to traditional four-node axillary node sampling, and is the recommended technique by the Association of Breast Surgery in the United Kingdom. In selected units axillary sampling has been compared with either radioisotope sentinel node or blue dye only techniques with comparable node positivity rates. There are no studies directly comparing combined method sentinel node biopsy (SNB) with conventional axillary (four) node sampling (ANS).

Methods

Data for all patients undergoing axillary staging by axillary node sample or sentinel node biopsy were collected, including those proceeding to axillary clearance as a second procedure, but excluding those undergoing axillary clearance as a first procedure.

Results

From January 2005 to January 2011, 641 axillary staging procedures were performed (SNB n = 231 (36.0%), ANS n = 410 (64.0%)). Baseline tumour characteristics were similar for the two groups except for a higher frequency of breast conservation in the SNB group (95.6 vs. 75.6%; p < 0.0001). The proportion of cases with positive nodes was higher in the SNB group (20.8 vs. 14.4%; p = 0.042). In patients who had presented with symptomatic disease, there was a significantly higher node positivity rate with SNB (30.9%) than with ANS (15.5%; p = 0.002), despite similar baseline characteristics in both groups.

Conclusion

Combined method sentinel node biopsy is more sensitive at detecting low volume axillary disease than traditional four-node sample.     

The role of sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Aim

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an accepted alternative to lymphadenectomy in the case of invasive breast carcinoma, although the sentinel node's role in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed on core needle biopsy has not been well defined nevertheless guidelines recommend this procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of sentinel nodes in female patients with primary DCIS using core needle stereotactic biopsy.

Material and methods

Between the years 2000 and 2005, 261 patients were diagnosed with DCIS by core needle biopsy. In this group, 183 patients underwent SNB to determine lymph node involvement. Those patients with metastases to the sentinel node underwent axillary lymphadenectomy.

Results

In the group of 183 patients that underwent SNB, 10 patients (5.5%) showed metastases to the sentinel lymph node. Histopathological studies of the primary lesions of these 10 patients revealed invasive ductal carcinoma in 6 cases (3.5%) and 1 case (0.5%) of invasive lobular carcinoma. Only 3 of the patients (1.5%) were given a final diagnosis of DCIS with metastases to sentinel lymph nodes, of which 2 cases were DCIS and 1 case was DCIS with microinvasion. Axillary lymphadenectomy performed on patients with abnormal SNB showed involvement of other axillary lymph nodes in 4 patients.

Conclusions

SNB as a diagnostic tool in DCIS remains controversial as the number of cases of axillary lymph node metastases is minuscule. The biggest clinical challenge in this situation is a group of patients with primary diagnosis of DCIS in which invasive components are seen by mammotomic biopsy.     

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy reliable and indicated after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Many studies support the concept and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) for staging patients with breast carcinoma, which can be performed with low morbidity in lymph node negative patients. Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) plays an important role in the treatment of patients with operable breast carcinoma and is another approach with which to reduce radical surgery in patients with more advanced disease. It is of interest whether the sentinel lymph node accurately represents the axillary status after PC and, thus, whether the sentinel node concept can be applied to both groups. METHODS: Thirty-three patients underwent SNB after chemotherapy and prior to axillary lymph node dissection. RESULTS: The average greatest tumor dimension before chemotherapy (33 mm +/- 2 mm) was significantly larger (P = 0.000) than after therapy (20 mm +/- 3 mm). Histopathologic complete remission was seen in only three patients. One or two sentinel lymph nodes (average, 1.7 lymph nodes) were identified with certainty in 29 of 33 procedures and accurately predicted axillary lymph node status in all of these patients. Breast-conserving surgery was possible in 21 patients (64%), and axillary lymph nodes were involved in 22 patients (67%). CONCLUSIONS: Even after patients undergo PC, SNB seems to be a reliable method for accurate staging of the axilla in those more advanced breast carcinoma. Thus, axillary dissection may be avoided in certain patients. Lymph node involvement seems to be likely in women with suspicious axillary findings before chemotherapy who have no visible sentinel lymph nodes on preoperative lymphosintigraphy and in patients without recurrent tumors. Further investigation of the SNB concept in this patient group should be evaluated in larger studies.     

Will early detection of non-axillary sentinel nodes affect treatment decisions?

Axillary lymph node involvement is the best prognostic factor for breast cancer survival. Staging breast cancers by axillary dissection remains standard management and is part of the UK national guidelines for breast cancer treatment. In the presence of involved axillary lymph nodes best treatment has been shown to be axillary clearance (Fentiman and Mansell, 1991), but clearly for women whose nodes are uninvolved avoidance of morbidity is optimal and this will be achieved by minimal dissection of the axilla. Thus, for node-negative women the introduction of the sentinel node biopsy technique may revolutionise the approach to the axilla. These will be women with mammographic screen detected small well and moderately differentiated tumours (Hadjiloucas and Bundred, 2000). The impact of sentinel node biopsy in women who have symptomatic large tumours is unproven, and around half of these women will require a second procedure to clear their axilla or radiotherapy as treatment. Even for those women found to have involved sentinel lymph nodes the ability to use early systemic chemotherapy followed by axillary clearance or radiotherapy may provide long-term survival gains. Sentinel node biopsy should not, however, become routine practice until randomised controlled trials have proven its benefit and safety in reducing morbidity. Several randomised controlled trials (including ALMANAC) are currently underway.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with multifocal breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Multifocal or multicentric breast cancer has been suggested as a contraindication for sentinel node biopsy (SNB). However, recent studies have demonstrated that all quadrants of the breast drain through common afferent channels to a common axillary sentinel node. This should mean that the presence of multifocal tumour should not affect the lymphatic drainage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of SNB in patients with multifocal breast cancer using a peritumoural injection technique for sentinel lymph node (SN) mapping. METHODS: In the ALMANAC multicentre trial validation phase, we took SNB samples from 842 patients with node negative, invasive breast cancer with use of a blue dye and radiolabelled colloid mapping technique at the peritumoural injection site. All patients underwent standard axillary treatment after SNB. Seventy-five of the 842 patients had multifocal lesions on final histopathologic examination. The following analysis is focused on patients with multifocal lesions. RESULTS: A mean number of 2.4 SNs were identified in 71 of 75 patients (identification rate: 94.7%). Thirty-one patients had a positive SN, 40 a negative SN. Standard axillary treatment confirmed the SN to be negative in 37 of 40 patients, whereas three patients revealed positive non-sentinel lymph nodes (false-negative rate: 8.8%). Overall SN biopsy accurately predicted axillary lymph node status in 68 of 71 patients (95.8%). CONCLUSION: SNB accurately staged the axilla in multifocal breast cancer and may become an alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection in node negative patients with multifocal breast cancer.     

Key issues in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer

Whereas the majority of surgeons in Western countries perform sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for early breast cancer, the majority of Japanese surgeons do not. Veronesi very recently reported the results of a clinical trial in which SNB without axillary lymph node dissection for small breast cancer did not increase axillary recurrence. Thus, sentinel node surgery has been accepted as a safe and accurate method of screening the axillary nodes for metastasis in women with small breast cancer. SNB should thus be recommended as standard care for early breast cancer in Japan. SNB for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may be performed according to the decision of doctors or patients in each case, because the indication of SNB for DCIS is controversial. Since preoperative chemotherapy could increase the rate of false-negative sentinel nodes because of the induced lymphatic changes, SNB is thought to be safer before than after preoperative chemotherapy. Current evidence does not allow internal mammary SNB to be recommended as a standard procedure, but as patients with internal mammary node involvement may benefit from adjuvant systemic treatment, internal mammary SNB should be further studied in this context. Preoperative diagnosis of an axillary metastasis using fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) under ultrasonographical imaging or core needle biopsy under MR imaging can cost-effectively decrease the indications of SNB.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer Patients with Palpable Axillary Node

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a reliable method for evaluation of the axillary lymph node status in early stage breast cancer patients with non-palpable lymph nodes. The present study evaluated the status of sentinel and non-sentinel lymph nodes in T1T2 patients with palpable axillary lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: One hundred and two women with early breast cancer were investigated in this study. Patients were selected for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy and then surgery .Then the rates of false negative and true positive, and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph nodes biopsy were evaluated. In addition, the hormone receptors status of the tumor was determined through IHC and data was analyzed in SPSS21. Results: In this study, the mean age of the patients was 49 years, 85% had invasive ductal carcinoma  in their pathology reports, 77% were ER/PR positive, 30% HER2 positive and 9.8% triple negative and 69% had KI67<14%. In frozen pathology, 15.7 and 84.3% were sentinel positive and negative, respectively, and in the final pathology, 41 and 58.8% were sentinel positive and negative, respectively. This difference arises from the false negative rate of the frozen pathology, which was about 31.3%. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the frozen section were 24, 90 and 43%, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion is an important effective factor in the involvement of sentinel and non-sentinel lymph nodes. Statistical analysis showed that the probability of sentinel and non-sentinel lymph nodes involvement was higher in receptor positive patients and those with KI67>14% (p<0.002) whereas the rate of involvement was lower in triple negative patients. Conclusion: Sentinel node biopsy can be used in a significant percentage of breast cancer patients with palpable and reactive axillary lymph nodes.     

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in the patients with breast cancer

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is always standard part for a variety of surgical treatments of breast cancer. Knowledge of the status of axillary nodes presents important information for staging and prognosis, but it remains controversial that ALND provides local control of disease and offer survivalbenefit. Some authors have questioned the wisdom of continuing to do ALND, when the risk of axillary metastasis in the early case is small, and the postoperative complications are usuall…     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结定位和活检

目的：难证乳腺癌前哨淋巴结定位和活检技术的可行性和前哨淋巴结的组织状况能否准确预告腋淋巴结的状况。方法：本研究使用专利蓝,对３３例乳腺癌患者进行了术中及术后前哨淋巴结定位和活检术。结果：３０例（９１％）找到前哨淋巴结,前哨淋巴结预告腋淋巴结的准确率为９６．７％,假阴性１例。结论：本研究结果证实,乳腺癌前哨淋巴结定位和活检技术是可行的,前哨淋巴结的组织学特征能够准确反映腑淋巴结的状况。我们相信在将来     

Computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of axillary nodal status in Breast Cancer

Background  We prospectively evaluated axillary lymph node metastasis by preoperative thin-slice computed tomography (CT) and compared those results with the results of dye-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB). Patients and Methods  Fifty-one breast cancer cases were examined. Preoperative axillary CT, dye-guided SNB and complete axillary lymph node dissection were performed. We prospectively diagnosed lymph node metastasis in the whole axillary region and qualitatively predicted the sentinel lymph node (SN) status with the preoperative CT images. Based on the results of SNB and the pathological nodal status as revealed by complete axillary dissection, we evaluated the usefulness of preoperative axillary CT as a predictor of axillary node metastasis, and we also investigated the qualitative diagnostic value of the SN predicted by CT. Results  For the whole axillary region, the results of CT diagnosis showed an accuracy of 71% and a sensitivity of 60%. The SN predicted by CT correlated with the SN identified by the dye-guided method in 86% of all cases. The SN status predicted by CT had an accuracy of 81%, a sensitivity of 78%, and a negative predictive value of 79%. The dye-guided methods resulted in three false-negative SN cases, however, CT predicted one of those cases as positive. Conclusions  Diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis by CT alone is inadequate. However, CT achieves a comparatively high rate of identification of axillary SN. The combined use of dye-guided SNB and preoperative CT will facilitate identification of the SN and also lower the false-negative rate.     

Sentinel node biopsy is not sensible in breast cancer patients with large primary tumours.

AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the outcome of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer patients with large primary tumours. METHODS: Nine hundred and eighty-four patients with invasive breast cancer and SNB were studied. The histological tumour size was larger than 3 cm in 70 patients. The advantages of SNB like avoiding axillary clearance (AC) or more accurate staging by detecting micrometastases or parasternal sentinel node metastases were evaluated in relation to the tumour size. RESULTS: Axillary metastases were detected in 351/914 patients with a tumour size of 3 cm or smaller and in 50/70 patients with larger tumours (p<0.0001). Micrometastases or isolated tumour cells only, were observed in 134/351 node positive patients with tumours not larger than 3 cm and in 10/50 cases with larger tumours (p=0.022). Parasternal sentinel node metastases were detected in 17/914 patients with a tumour size of 3 cm or smaller and 2/70 patients with larger tumours (p=ns). AC was omitted because of tumour negative sentinel node findings 168 of the 232 patients with stage T1 a-b tumours and 281 of those 489 with T1c tumours. Twenty of the 70 patients with tumours larger than 3 cm avoided AC. CONCLUSIONS: SNB is not sensible in breast cancer patients with tumours larger than 3 cm, because of the small proportion avoiding AC after SNB.     

Combination technique is superior to dye alone in identification of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the combination of dye and radioisotope would improve the detection rate of sentinel nodes (SN) and the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node status over dye alone in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was performed in stages I or II breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes using dye alone (indocyanine green) or a combination of dye and radioisotope (99mTc-radiolabelled tin colloid). RESULTS: SNB guided by dye alone was performed in 93 patients and SNB guided by a combination of dye and radioisotope was performed in 138 patients. The detection rate of SN was significantly (P = 0.006) higher in the combination group (94.9%) than in the dye alone group (83.9%). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of SNB in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node status were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively, for the combination group, and 81.0, 100, and 94.9%, respectively, for the dye alone group. There were no false negatives in the combination group, but four false negatives (19.0%) in the dye alone group. The combination method was significantly superior to the dye alone method for sensitivity (P = 0.011) and accuracy (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a radioisotope to the dye in SNB increases the detection rate of SNs in breast cancer patients, and SNs detected by the combination method predict the axillary lymph node status with greater accuracy than those detected by the dye alone method.     

Minimal access breast surgery – A single breast incision for breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy

Aims

Minimal access breast surgery (MABS) is a procedure that completes breast conservation surgery (BCS) and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) through a single incision. It allows access to axillary sentinel nodes via the breast incision and also provides access to the internal mammary nodes (IMN) as well as other nodal sites when needed. The aims of this study are to describe the MABS approach and to evaluate its safety and efficacy in cases undergoing BCS and SNB (axillary or IMN) for treatment of breast cancer.

Methods

The surgical technique for MABS is described. One hundred and three consecutive clinically lymph node negative patients undergoing BCS and SNB (axillary or IMN) were considered for MABS. Cases were classified according to the location of sentinel nodes dissected (axillary, internal mammary or other), the location of the tumour and whether MABS was used. The success of MABS was calculated based on the number of cases where BCS and SNB were completed through a single breast incision. Number of lymph nodes (LN) retrieved, rate of LN positivity, aesthetics and complications were documented.

Results

Eighty-six percent of cases of BCS with axillary-only SNB were completed with MABS. For cases of BCS with axillary and IMN SNB, MABS was successful for BCS and IMN SNB in 97% of cases and for BCS and SNB from both nodal regions in 63%. There was only one case, a woman with breast prostheses, who required three separate incisions. When axillary-only SNB cases were completed with MABS, an average of 2.9 axillary LN per case with a 29% axillary LN positivity rate was seen. When axillary and IMN SNB were completed with MABS for both regions, an average of 3.0 axillary LN per case were retrieved with an axillary LN positivity rate of 65%. When separate axillary and breast incisions were made, 2.7 LN per case were removed with an axillary LN positivity rate of 30%. Aesthetics were excellent and there were no complications associated with reaching the nodes through the breast incision.

Conclusion

MABS is a feasible option for the majority of women undergoing BCS and SNB and it does not compromise the success of SNB.     

Axillary surgery in breast cancer patients

Surgeons have routinely removed ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes from women with breast cancer for over 100 years. The procedure provides important staging information, enhances regional control of the malignancy and may improve survival. As screening of breast cancer has increased, the mean size of newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancers has steadily decreased and so has the number of women with lymph node metastases. Recognising that the therapeutic benefit of removing normal nodes may be low, alternatives to the routine level I/II axillary lymph node dissection have been sought. A decade ago sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was introduced. Because of its high accuracy and relatively low morbidity, this technique is now widely used to identify women with histologically involved nodes prior to the formal axillary node dissection. Specifically, SLNB has allowed surgeons to avoid a formal axillary lymph node biopsy in women with histologically uninvolved sentinel nodes, while identifying women with involved sentinel nodes who derive the most benefit from a completion axillary node dissection. Despite the increasing use of SLNB for initial management of the axilla in women with breast cancer, important questions remain regarding patient selection criteria and optimal surgical methods for performing the biopsy. This article discusses the evolution of axillary node surgery for women with breast cancer.     

Accuracy of Methylene Blue Test as Single Technique for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stages Breast Cancer

Aim: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) establishes as a gold standard for diagnostic lymph node involvement in early breast cancer. Most of the developed country does not have radiotracer and nuclear medicine facilities. Unless in Indonesia there is Methylene Blue as an alternative agent for SLNB. This study measure accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a single technique using the Methylene Blue test. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 60 female patients with breast cancer stage I-II. We performed SNB using 2-5 cc of 1% Methylene-blue dye (MBD) injected to periareolar tissue and proceeded with axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND). The histopathology results of sentinel nodes (SNs) and axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) analyze for diagnostic value assessments. Results: The identification rate of SN was 97.62 %, and the median number of identified SNs was 4 (2-7). Sentinel node metastasis was found in (19/60) % cases and % of them were macrometastases. The sensitivity and specificity of MBD were 91.67% and 96.67% respectively. The negative predictive value (NPV) of SNs to predict axillary metastasis was 96.67% (95% CI, 81-99%). Conclusion: Injection of 1% MBD as a single technique in breast cancer SNB has a favorable identification rate and predictive value.     

The Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Determining Optimal Therapy for Breast Cancer

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is typically a standard part of the care of patients with breast cancer. It offers the most precise information about prognosis, controls potential metastatic disease in the axilla, and may provide a small survival advantage. Unfortunately, the procedure is expensive, uncomfortable, and associated with potential long term morbidity. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed as a minimally invasive method for axillary staging, with avoidance of full ALND in those cases (the majority) where the sentinel node is histologically negative. When done by experienced surgeons, the sentinel node is identified in at least 95% of cases, with a minimal (<5%) false negative rate. Immunohistochemistry may be performed selectively on the sentinel node, and upstages up to 20% of putative node negative patients. Nevertheless, SNB has a significant learning curve, with inexperienced surgeons identifying a sentinel node less frequently (in 60 to 80% of cases) with more false negatives. Use of SNB by inexperienced surgeons may lead to undertreatment (not using chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy) and possible axillary recurrence. SNB is gradually replacing ALND as the standard of care for patients with the early stage of breast cancer, but the clinician must be aware of local surgeon and institution experience. Until each surgical team has documented their expertise with SNB, full ALND should be considered the local standard of care.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy as an indicator for axillary dissection in early breast cancer

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is a new component of the surgical treatment of breast cancer that accurately predicts axillary status. Although the procedure is still mainly investigational, many patients are requesting SNB to avoid axillary dissection if the sentinel node (SN) is negative. From March 1996 to December 1999, 373 patients with breast carcinoma and clinically negative axillary nodes underwent breast surgery, mainly conservative, and SNB. If the SN was histologically uninvolved no further surgical treatment was given. All patients were informed in detail and signed a consent form. SNB involved injection of labelled albumin particles close to the primary tumour, lymphoscintigraphy and location of the sentinel node with a gamma probe during surgery. 379 SNBs were performed on 373 patients (6 were bilateral). In 94, the SN was positive and complete axillary dissection was performed. In 285 cases (280 patients) the SN was negative and no dissection was performed: these were carefully followed with quarterly clinical examination of the axilla. A total of 343 years at risk were available for evaluation from which seven cases of axillary metastases were expected. No cases of clinically evident axillary node metastasis have occurred. These findings provide further confirmation of the validity of SNB and prompt us to suggest that it should become the method of choice for axillary staging in small-sized breast cancer.     

Towards rational axillary treatment in relation to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer

AimsThe purpose of this study is to analyse nodal staging and axillary response in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to explore venues to safely spare patients axillary clearance whenever it could be avoided.MethodsIn 327 patients we determined the nodal status before NAC by ultrasound-guided cytology and if indicated by sentinel node biopsy (SNB). In patients with proven metastasis we analysed the axillary response after NAC.ResultsBefore NAC, the ultrasound-guided cytology was positive in 252 patients. In the remaining 75 patients SNB was performed prior to NAC. The SNB was negative in 53 patients, thus in these patients axillary clearance could be avoided. All 274 patients with proven axillary metastases at diagnosis underwent axillary clearance after NAC. Twenty percent of the cytology-positive patients (50/252) had an axillary pathological complete remission (pCR) and 68% of the SNB-positive patients (15/22) had no lymph node (LN) metastasis after NAC. Subgroups with a high axillary pCR rate were patients with triple-negative tumours (57%) and human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumours (68%) who had a pCR of the primary tumour.ConclusionsTwenty percent of the patients with proven metastasis by cytology prior to NAC have an axillary pCR. The axillary pCR rate is very high in certain subgroups. Identification of these patients, could result in more axilla-conserving therapies.