Patterns of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors among 37,838 first‐degree relatives of 13,896 patients with multiple myeloma in Sweden

There are emerging data to suggest a role for genetic factors in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma (MM). Based on small numbers, certain solid tumors have been reported to occur more frequently among blood relatives of patients with MM. Using population‐based data, we assessed risks for hematologic malignancies, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), and solid tumors among first‐degree relatives of patients with MM. We included 13,896 patients with MM and 54,365 matched controls. Also we identified first‐degree relatives of patients with MM (n = 37,838) and controls (n = 151,068). Using a marginal survival model, we estimated relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for hematologic and solid tumors among family members of patients with MM and controls as measures of familial aggregation. Compared with relatives of controls, relatives of patients with MM had an increased risk of developing MM (RR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.6–2.9), MGUS (2.1; 1.5–3.1), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (2.1; 1.0–4.2), any solid tumor (1.1; 1.0–1.1) and bladder cancer (1.3; 1.0–1.5). No significantly increased risk was found for other hematologic or solid malignancies. Our findings support a role for a shared susceptibility (genetic, environmental or both) that predisposes to MM, MGUS, ALL and bladder cancer. © 2009 UICC     

Risk for smoking-related cancer among relatives of lung cancer patients

Studies of familial aggregation of cancer provide indirect evidence for the role of genetic predisposition to cancer. In an ongoing case-control study, we evaluated whether first-degree relatives of lung cancer cases are at increased risk of lung and other cancers. Smoking-related cancers were defined as cancers of the lung, bladder, head and neck, kidney, and pancreas. The 806 probands included in this analysis were patients referred to The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). We identified 663 controls, matched to the cases on age (+/-5 years), sex, ethnicity, and smoking history, who were recruited from a local multispecialty physician practice in the Houston metropolitan area. Self-reported cancer family history data were available for 6430 first-degree relatives of the cases and 4936 first-degree relatives of the controls. An excess of cancer in relatives was evaluated by comparing the observed cancer cases among relatives of the cases with relatives of the controls. We conducted further analysis after stratifying on age of lung cancer onset (age at study registration for controls) and smoking status (never, former, or current) of the probands. We also conducted Cox regression analysis and compared time to cancer diagnosis among the relatives of the cases and controls adjusted for age and smoking status of proband and family members. Siblings [relative risk (RR) = 1.85; P = 0.003] of cases had a significant excess of lung cancer and an excess of smoking-related cancers (RR = 1.29; P = 0.01). We observed evidence of familial aggregation (RR = 1.71; P < 0.001) of lung cancer among relatives of late-onset lung cancer cases. From the Cox regression, we observed a moderate risk for development of lung (RR = 1.25; P = 0.09) and other smoking-related cancers (RR = 1.23; P = 0.05). After adjustment for smoking behavior of probands and their relatives, the risks of lung cancer (RR = 1.33; P = 0.03) and smoking-related cancers (RR = 1.28; P = 0.02) were statistically significant. We further stratified on age at onset and observed no evidence (P = 0.81) of familial aggregation of lung cancer among young onset (相似文献   

Familial occurrence of hematologic malignancies and other diseases in multiple myeloma: a case-control study

In a population-based case-control study in Sweden on multiple myeloma, the occurrence of different diseases in relatives, particularly hematologic malignancies and different types of cancer, was investigated. Through a questionnaire mailed to all living subjects, i.e. cases and controls, and to the next-of-kin for deceased subjects, information was obtained on malignant and certain other diseases among relatives. All malignant diseases reported among first-degree relatives were verified, if possible, through parochial authorities and the Swedish Cancer Register. In total, data from 239 cases with myeloma and 220 controls were analyzed. An increased risk was found for persons with first-degree relatives with hematologic malignancies (relative risk [RR]=2.36, 90 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.90–6.15), and also with multiple myeloma specifically (RR=5.64, CI=1.16–27.51). An increased risk also was seen if the close relatives had experienced another tumor disease (RR=1.21, CI=0.86–1.71). Particularly, occurrence of prostatic cancer (RR=3.11, CI=1.25–7.71) or brain tumor (RR=6.61, CI=1.42–30.67) in relatives increased the risk for multiple myeloma.Dr Eriksson in with the Department of Oncology, University Hospital, S-901-85 Umeå, Sweden. Dr Hållberg is with the Department of Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Address correspondence to Dr Eriksson. This research was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Fund. (Project 2683-B90-02X.)     

Familial aggregation and heterogeneity of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in population-based samples.

The importance of genetic factors in the etiology of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is suggested by case-control and cohort studies. Most previous studies have been too small to estimate accurately risks of specific categories of lymphoproliferative malignancies in relatives of NHL cases or to quantify the contribution of NHL case characteristics to familial risk. We have overcome sample size limitations and potential recall bias by using large databases from Sweden and Denmark. Diagnoses of lymphoproliferative malignancies were compared in 70,006 first-degree relatives of 26,089 NHL cases (including 7,432 with subtype information) versus 161,352 first-degree relatives of 58,960 matched controls. Relatives of NHL cases were at significantly increased risk for NHL [relative risk (RR), 1.73; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.39-2.15], Hodgkin lymphoma (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.0-1.97), and nonsignificantly for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.93-1.85). No increased risk was found for multiple myeloma among case relatives. Findings with respect to siblings compared with parents and offspring or with respect to age at diagnosis of proband were inconsistent. In both populations, relatives of cases with an aggressive NHL subtype were at substantially increased risk of NHL (combined RR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.80-7.02). We conclude that NHL has an important familial component, which is shared with Hodgkin lymphoma and CLL. We estimate that the absolute lifetime risk for a first-degree relative of an NHL case to develop NHL is 3.6% (compared with a population risk of 2.1%) and higher if the index case had an aggressive subtype of NHL.     

Cancer risk estimates for family members of a population-based family registry for breast and ovarian cancer.

Population-based breast and ovarian cancer family registries can facilitate studies to evaluate genetic and environmental factors in the etiology of these malignancies. The purpose of this study is to describe what is, as far as we know, the first population-based breast and ovarian cancer family registry and to estimate breast and ovarian cancer risk in relatives of breast and ovarian cancer probands. Population-based consecutive incident cases of breast and ovarian cancer were invited to participate in the University of California, Irvine breast and ovarian family registry. In this study, we report data on 1567 breast cancer and 328 ovarian cancer probands. The operational components of this family registry include enrollment of probands, family history interviewing, confidentiality, pathology, verification and review, biospecimen bank, statistical/genetic analysis, and special studies on positional cloning of known genes. All of the components are tracked through the University of California, Irvine Genetic Research Information System. In non-Hispanic-white breast cancer probands, relative risk (RR) of breast cancer in mothers and sisters is significantly elevated [RR = 1.7 and 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.4-2.0 and RR = 2.8 and 95% CI = 2.3-3.3, respectively]. In families of ovarian cancer probands, mothers are at increased risk of ovarian cancer (RR = 4.6; 95% CI, 2.1-8.7). RR of breast cancer in mothers of Hispanic breast cancer probands is significantly elevated (RR = 4.9; 95% CI, 2.6-8.5). No elevation of breast or ovarian cancer risk was observed among relatives of Asian probands. In general, there is a decrease in RR among mothers and sisters with increase in age of onset of probands. In second-degree relatives and first cousins, the breast cancer hazards ratios increase with increase in the number of affected first-degree relatives and decrease with increase in age at onset of the proband.     

Familial risk of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United STATES: Although smoking and age are known risk factors for pancreatic cancer, several case reports and case-control studies have suggested that there is also a familial risk. We evaluated whether a family history of pancreatic cancer increases the risk of pancreatic cancer in first-degree relatives and whether smoking and younger age at cancer diagnosis further increase this risk. METHODS: We conducted in-person interviews with 247 patients ("case probands") with pancreatic cancer and 420 population-based control probands to collect risk factor data and pancreatic cancer family history for 1816 first-degree relatives of the case probands and 3157 first-degree relatives of the control probands. We analyzed the data by unconditional logistic regression models, with adjustment for correlated data by use of generalized estimating equations. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A positive family history of pancreatic cancer (i.e., being related to a case proband) or ever-smoking cigarettes approximately doubled the risk of pancreatic cancer (relative risk [RR] = 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32 to 4.69; RR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.09 to 3.83, respectively). The RR increased to 8.23 (95% CI = 2.18 to 31.07) for relatives who ever smoked and were related to a case proband who was diagnosed before age 60 years. CONCLUSION: Routine questioning of patients about a family history of pancreatic cancer, the age of onset of this cancer in their relatives, and the patient's smoking status may identify individuals at high risk of pancreatic cancer. Future research exploring the genetic and environmental interactions associated with the risk of pancreatic cancer is critically important.     

Multiple myeloma and family history of cancer. A case-control study

A hospital-based case-control study was done to examine the hypothesis that persons with a family history of multiple myeloma (MM) or other cancers are at increased risk of multiple myeloma. Study members were 439 cases of multiple myeloma and 1317 matched controls seen at the Duke University Medical Center. Only 3 cases and 4 controls reported multiple myeloma in their families. The relative risk (RR) was 2.3, but the 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.5-10.1, allowing no firm conclusion about the risk associated with familial MM. A family history of cancer of any type resulted in a relative risk of MM of 1.4 (CI: 1.1-1.8). This association was strongest (RR = 2.5, CI: 1.1-5.3) among young study members (age less than or equal to 49). A family history of hematologic malignancy (ICD 200-208) resulted in a RR of 2.4 (95% CI: 1.4-4.0). The data also suggested that a family history of lung cancer, breast cancer, and genitourinary cancer may be associated with increased risk of myeloma in older persons.     

Familial occurrence of carcinoid tumors and association with other malignant neoplasms.

Carcinoid tumors are generally thought to be sporadic, except for a small proportion that occur as a part of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes. Data regarding the familial occurrence of carcinoid as well as its potential association with other neoplasms are limited. A chart review was conducted on patients indexed for malignant carcinoid tumor of the gastrointestinal tract seen at the Mayo Clinic between 1988 and 1996. A survey of family history of malignancies and personal history of other tumors was mailed to all eligible patients. Data for 245 patients were analyzed. Observed rates of carcinoids and other malignancies were compared with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Estimates of the cumulative probability for first-degree relatives developing a carcinoid tumor were calculated. Nine (3.7%) patients with carcinoid tumor had at least one first-degree relative with the same malignancy. The rate of carcinoid tumor in first-degree relatives of probands was higher (P < 0.0001) than expected based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population data. Cumulative probability in a first-degree relative for developing a carcinoid was calculated to be 1.5% at age 80. There was an increased risk for developing a carcinoid tumor among first-degree relatives of patients with carcinoid. Neither patients with carcinoid nor their first-degree relatives had an increased incidence of other malignancies.     

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and family history of malignant tumors in a case-control study (United States)

Using data froma case-control study in the United States (the Selected Cancers Study), weexamined the relationship between non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and family history of different cancers. Cases were 1,511 men aged 31 to 59 years and diagnosed pathologically with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma during 1984-88. Controls were men, frequency-matched to cases by age range and cancer registry (n = 1,910). All study subjects with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome were excluded from analyses. Our results showed that the risk of NHL is associated with a history of lymphoma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.0, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-5.2) and hematologic cancer (OR = 2.0, CI = 1.2-3.4) in first-degree relatives after adjustment for age, ethnic background, and educational level. Further analyses were performed for the subgroups defined by age at diagnosis (younger than 45 years cf 45 years or older). The association of NHL with a family history of lymphoma and hematologic cancer was found primarily among men aged 45 and older (OR = 4.1, CI = 1.9-8.8 for lymphoma and OR = 2.3, CI = 1.3-4.0 for hematologic cancer). The association among men aged 45 and older did not vary by whether or not there were any familial patients diagnosed at the age of 45 or older. No significant associations could be found for a family history of lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, skin cancer, liver cancer, stomach cancer, brain cancer, thyroid cancer, or myeloma. This study suggests that the familial risk of NHL is influenced primarily by hematolymphoproliferative malignancies rather than other cancers. The familial effects of hema-tolymphoproliferative malignancies may be stronger for men aged 45 to 59, compared with those aged 31 to 44.     

479例肝细胞癌先证者家族聚集性分析

目的通过肝细胞癌（HCC）先证者一级亲属发病调查情况,探讨HCC病例分布的家族聚集性的特点。方法应用临床流行病学横断面研究方法,对2004～2008年广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院HCC先证者家系中一级亲属HCC发病情况进行调查,回顾性采用Poisson（泊松）分布模型拟合,并用频数分布拟合优度的x。检验进行验证。对有家族史的HCC分布用二项分布（p＋q）n模型拟合。HCC分离比采用Li—Mantel—Gart法估算。结果HCC先证者479例,占住院人数16．91％（479／2832）。该家族中实际病例数分布超越了二项分布的概率范围（P=0．028）。HCC的分离比为0．04,分离比方差为0．00001509,标准误为0．003885,95％可信限区间：0．033784～0．046216。结论HCC发病具有家族聚集现象,主要集中在一级亲属,HCC的遗传方式为多基因遗传,HCC先证者家系是HCC发病的危险因素之一。     

Bladder cancer risk as modified by family history and smoking

BACKGROUND: The familial risk of bladder cancer (BC) is not well understood and, to date, little attention has been paid to the joint effect of smoking and family history in modifying the risk of BC. The authors investigated the role of family history in association with the risk of BC. METHODS: Case and control probands were identified as part of an on-going BC case-control study. The relative risk associated with a family history of BC was estimated. RESULTS: In total, 713 cases and 658 controls were included. In a case-control analysis, compared with individuals who never smoked and who had no family history of BC, probands who had smoked and who also had a positive family history were at 5.31-fold increased risk of BC (P for interaction = .04). The 713 case probands and the 658 controls reported 5160 and 4816 first-degree relatives, respectively. Compared with never-smoking relatives who had probands diagnosed with BC at an older age (age >65 years), ever-smoking relatives who had probands diagnosed at a younger age (ages 40-65 years) showed a 6.89-fold (95% confidence interval, from 2.25-fold to 21.12-fold) increased risk. Similar results were obtained for the joint effects of family history of BC and smoking. CONCLUSIONS. The current results indicated that a positive family history of BC may have interacted with smoking habits to increase the risk of BC in the study population.     

Cancer in first-degree relatives and risk of glioma in adults.

Relatively few studies have examined glioma risk in relation to history of cancer in first-degree relatives. We sought to describe such risks in a large hospital-based case-control study. Histologically confirmed incident adult glioma cases (n = 489) were identified at three regional referral hospitals between June 1994 and August 1998. Controls (n = 799) admitted to the same hospitals for nonmalignant conditions were frequency-matched on age, sex, race/ethnicity, hospital, and proximity of residence to hospital. Participants received a personal interview, including questions regarding cancer in family members. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to estimate the risk of glioma associated with a history of cancer in a first-degree relative using conditional logistic regression and compared with standardized incidence ratios among relatives of cases versus relatives of controls. Among participants reporting a family history of a brain cancer or a brain tumor, risk of glioma was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5-5.3; n = 5] and 3.0 (95% CI, 0.9-10.8; n = 7), respectively, in comparison with those without such family histories. Participants who had a family history of stomach (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.0-4.6), colon (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.2), or prostate cancer (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.8) or Hodgkin disease (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.9-6.3) had an increased glioma risk. OR estimates were similar to the ratios of standardized incidence ratios for cancer in relatives of cases versus controls. Shared environmental or genetic factors in families may influence glioma risk. Our findings suggest that individuals with a family history of specific cancers other than glioma may have an increased glioma risk.     

Familial Malignant Melanoma - Overview

Approximately 3-15% of all malignant melanomas (MM) are familial cases. MM is a highly heterogeneous tumour type from a genetic perspective. Pedigrees with disease confined to a single generation of siblings or MM occurring among second- or third-degree relatives suggest multifactorial polygenic inheritance. However, not infrequently, within large families aggregations of MM are consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance, suggesting a hereditary syndrome caused by germline alterations of a single gene. Several different genes are involved in the development of MM. However, even when taken together they are responsible for less than 20% of all MM cases. It is thus necessary to perform association studies focused on genetic markers that could be used in identifying patients with a high risk of MM. Evaluation of aggregations of MM and other malignancies, like breast cancer, could be essential in identifying relatives of MM probands being at high risk of developing malignancies other than MM. The ultimate goal is to apply in these cases prevention recommendations and surveillance protocols to reduce the disease risk.     

Increased risk of breast cancer in relatives of malignant melanoma patients from families with strong cancer familial aggregation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of occurrence of malignancies of different site of origin in patients with malignant melanoma (MM) of the skin and their first-degree relatives from families with cancer familial aggregations with unknown pathogenetic background (CFA). We analysed tumour spectrum and age at diagnosis of malignancies in 51 families with MM/CFA. In addition, we evaluated observed frequency (OF); expected frequency (EF); and relative risk (RR) of occurrence of malignancies in these families. In all cases peripheral blood examination of common Polish founder BRCA1 mutations was performed. In 25 families, we analysed loss of heterozygosity of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. We identified two subgroups of cases: 22 MM/CFA families with MM diagnosed before 55 years (< or =55 MM/CFA) and 29 MM/CFA families with MM diagnosed after 55 (>55 MM/CFA). In these families we observed increased proportion of breast cancers: 17.52% in the first subgroup (mean age of diagnosis 48.5) and 12.15% in the second subgroup. The odds ratio for breast tumours occurring before 50 in < or =55 MM/CFA families was 3.71. We also observed increased numbers of liver cancers, CSU and leukaemias. OF and EF analyses revealed increased risk of occurrence of cancers of breast (OF 10.4%, EF 4.5%) and liver (OF 1.9%, EF 0.8%) in women from MM/CFA families, RR for breast tumours was approximately 3.3 in < or =55 MM/CFA families. Molecular examination of MM/CFA families revealed no alterations within the BRCA2 gene and one germline mutation of the BRCA1 gene. In conclusion, it seems to be justified to consider systematic breast surveillance beginning at the age around 35-40 years as an option in women from < or =55 MM/CFA families.     

Risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and family history of lymphatic, hematologic, and other cancers.

BACKGROUND: An elevated risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has been associated with a family history of NHL and several other malignancies, but the magnitude of risks and mechanisms are uncertain. METHODS: We used self-reported family history data from a recent multicenter U.S.-based case-control studies of NHL to evaluate familial aggregation of NHL with various hematolymphoproliferative and other cancers. Estimates of familial aggregation were obtained as hazard ratios (HR) that compare incidence of different cancers in first-degree relatives of NHL cases with that in the first-degree relatives of NHL controls. Limitations of the study included low participation rates (76% for cases and 52% for controls) and potential differential accuracy of recall. RESULTS: Risk of NHL was elevated in relatives of NHL cases [HR, 2.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.95-8.53]; the aggregation seems to be stronger for siblings (HR, 7.6; 95% CI, 0.98-58.8) and for male relatives (HR, 6.2; 95% CI, 0.77-50.0). Risk of Hodgkin's lymphoma seems to be also elevated among relatives of early-onset (<50 years) NHL cases (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 0.88-11.6). Evaluation of family history of other cancers provided modest evidence for an increased risk of melanoma of the skin (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.08-7.75), pancreatic cancer (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.96-4.43), stomach cancer (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.91-3.63), and prostate cancer (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.87-1.99). CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with previous findings of familial aggregation of NHL, Hodgkin's lymphoma, and a few other cancers. The pattern of male-specific and sibling-specific familial aggregation of NHL we observed, if confirmed, may shed new light on the possible mechanisms that underlie familial aggregation of the disease.     

Familial aggregation of Hodgkin lymphoma and related tumors

BACKGROUND: The importance of genetic factors in the etiology of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has been suggested by family and population studies. However, the spectrum of malignancies associated with common genetic etiology and the effects of gender and age on familial risk have not been established. METHODS: Diagnoses of lymphoproliferative malignancies were compared in 15,799 first-degree relatives of 5047 patients with HL versus 32,117 first-degree relatives of 10,078 control probands from Sweden and in 7185 first-degree relatives of 2429 patients with HL versus 27,434 first-degree relatives of 8,495 control probands from Denmark using marginal survival models. RESULTS: The risk of HL in relatives of patients with HL was increased significantly in both populations, with relative risks of 3.47 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.77-6.80) in Sweden and 2.55 (95% CI, 1.01-6.45) in Denmark and a pooled estimate of 3.11 (95%CI, 1.82-5.29). In Sweden, risks for relatives of patients also were increased significantly for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (in males). Relative risks were higher in males compared with females and in siblings of patients compared with parents and offspring of patients. Relatives of patients with earlier-onset disease were at higher risk for HL. CONCLUSIONS: HL has an important familial component, which is stronger in families of affected individuals age < 40 years, in males, and in siblings, and it is shared with some (but not other) lymphoproliferative malignancies. The cumulative lifetime risks are very small, however, for the development of HL de novo or in first-degree relatives of affected patients.     

Family history of breast cancer as a risk factor for ovarian cancer in a prospective study

BACKGROUND: A family history of breast cancer has been associated with increased ovarian cancer risk. However, few studies have assessed risk according to characteristics that suggest an inherited cancer susceptibility disorder, such as earlier-than-usual age at cancer diagnosis, family members with double primary cancers of different types, multiple relatives with cancer, and cancer in both members of paired organs. METHODS: Ovarian cancer risk was assessed according to a detailed breast cancer family history among 49,975 participants in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project Breast Cancer Defection Demenstration Project (BCDDP) Follow-up Study (1979-1998). In all, 362 incident ovarian cancers were identified during follow-up and rate ratios (RRs) were calculated by Poisson regression. RESULTS.: Breast cancer in a first- or second-degree relative was associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer (RR = 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-1.7). Having 2 or more affected first-degree relatives was associated with increased risk (RR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.1-2.8), especially for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer before age 60 (RR = 4.2; 95% CI = 1.9-9.2) or with a personal history of breast cancer (RR = 3.7; 95% CI 1.8-7.7). Risk was also particularly high for women with 2 or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer and at least 1 affected relative diagnosed before age 50 (RR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.4-4.8) or with bilateral breast cancer (RR = 4.2; 95% CI = 1.7-10). CONCLUSIONS: A detailed breast cancer family history as well as an individual's age and personal history of breast cancer are useful for identifying women at elevated genetic risk of ovarian cancer.     

Familial risks of esophageal cancer among the Turkmen population of the Caspian littoral of Iran

In northeastern Iran, there is an area of high incidence of esophageal cancer, which is populated by residents of Turkmen ancestry. Several environmental risk factors for esophageal cancer have been proposed, but the roles of familial and genetic factors have not been studied extensively in the Turkmen population. We evaluated the importance of familial risk factors for esophageal cancer by performing a case-control study of 167 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and 200 controls of Turkmen ethnicity. Detailed family pedigrees of the cases and controls were constructed, which documented all cancers in first- and second-degree relatives. The actuarial risk of cancer was then estimated in 2,097 first-degree relatives of cases and 2,783 first-degree relatives of the controls. A hazard ratio was constructed, based on a comparison of the 2 cumulative incidence curves. The risk to age 75 of esophageal cancer in the first-degree relatives of Turkmen patients with esophageal cancer was 34% versus 14% for the first-degree relatives of the controls (hazard ratio = 2.3; p = 3 x 10(-8)). Cases (9.6%) reported that their parents were related, versus 2.5% of the controls who reported this. (odds ratio = 4.1; p value = 0.006). Familial factors are important in the etiology of esophageal cancer among the Turkmen residents of Iran. The hazard ratio of 2.3 for cancer among first-degree relatives is consistent with an important contribution of heritable factors. It will be of interest to perform marker studies to establish which genes are responsible.     

Increased risk of incident pancreatic cancer among first-degree relatives of patients with familial pancreatic cancer.

It has been estimated that familial aggregation and genetic susceptibility play a role in as many as 10% of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). The quantified prospective risk of PC among first-degree relatives of PC patients has not been investigated. Families enrolled in the National Familial Pancreas Tumor Registry (NFPTR) prior to September 1, 1998 were followed to estimate the risk and incidence of PC among first-degree relatives of patients with PC. Analyses were performed separately on kindreds with at least two first-degree relatives with PC (familial pancreatic carcinoma (PC); n = 150) at the time the kindred was enrolled in the NFPTR and on kindreds without a pair of affected first-degree relatives (sporadic PC; n = 191). A subanalysis was performed on familial PC kindreds containing three or more affected members at the time of enrollment in the NFPTR (n = 52). Risk was estimated by comparing observed new cases of PC during the observation period with expected numbers based on the United States population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program data. Incidence was estimated using person-years risk analyses. During the observational period, six incident PCs developed in the first-degree relatives: two in the sporadic PC kindreds, and four in the familial PC kindreds. The PC risk in the sporadic PC kindreds was not significantly greater than expected [observed/expected = 6.5 (95% CI = 0.78-23.3)] with an incidence rate of 24.5/10(5)/ year. There was a significantly increased 18-fold risk (95% CI = 4.74-44.5) of PC among first-degree relatives in familial PC kindreds, with an incidence of 76.0/10(5)/year. In the subset of familial PC kindreds with three or more affected family members at the time of enrollment, there was a 57-fold (95% CI = 12.4-175) increased risk of PC and an incidence of 301.4/10(5)/year compared with the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result age-adjusted incidence of PC in the U.S. (8.8/10(5)/year). When stratified by age, the risk was largely confined to relatives over the age of 60. This study is the first analysis of incident PC occurring in familial PC kindreds. The risk and incidence of PC is exceptionally high among at-risk first-degree relatives in familial PC kindreds in which at least three first-degree relatives have already been diagnosed with PC. Familial PC kindreds are a reasonable high-risk group for PC screening and chemoprevention research.     

Familial and environmental interactions in bladder cancer risk

In a population-based study of 2,982 bladder cancer patients and 5,782 controls in 10 geographic areas of the United States which was designed to assess the role of environmental risk factors, information was also obtained on the history of urinary tract cancer in first-degree relatives. A family history of urinary tract cancer significantly elevated the risk of bladder cancer [relative risk (RR) = 1.45], with higher risks observed among patients under age 45. The risks of bladder cancer associated with positive family history were generally higher among persons with suspected environmental exposures, particularly heavy cigarette smoking (RR = 10.7 among those who smoked 3 or more packs per day). Further studies of bladder cancer should incorporate biochemical and genetic probes to assess mechanisms of familial susceptibility and interactions with environmental factors.