Early findings of prospective anti‐HLA donor specific antibodies monitoring study in pancreas transplantation: Indiana University Health Experience

The significance of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) is not well known in the setting of pancreas transplantation. Since December 2009, we prospectively followed pancreas transplant patients with single‐antigen‐luminex‐bead testing at one, two, three, six, and then every six months for the first two yr. Thirty‐five of the 92 patients that underwent pancreas transplantation (13 pancreas‐alone [PTA], 20 with a kidney [SPK], and two after a kidney [PAK]) agreed to participate in study. Median age at transplant was 45 yr and follow‐up was 23 months. Majority were Caucasian (n = 33) and male (n = 18). Rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin induction was used. Median HLA‐mismatch was 4.2 ± 1.1. Eight patients (7SPK, 1PAK) developed post‐transplant DSA at median follow‐up of 76 d (26–119), 1 SPK had pre‐formed DSA. Seven patients had both class I and class II DSA, one with class I and one with class II only. Mean peak class I DSA‐MFI was 3529 (±1456); class II DSA‐MFI was 5734 (±3204) whereas cumulative DSA MFI (CI + CII) was 9264 (±4233). No difference was observed in the patient and donor demographics among patients with and without DSA. One patient in non‐DSA group developed acute cellular rejection of pancreas. From our data it appears that post‐transplant DSA in pancreas allograft recipients may not impact the early‐pancreatic allograft outcomes. The utility of prospective DSA monitoring in pancreatic transplant patients needs further evaluation and long‐term follow‐up.     

Profiling non‐HLA antibody responses in antibody‐mediated rejection following heart transplantation

Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) driven by the development of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) directed against mismatched donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a major risk factor for graft loss in cardiac transplantation. Recently, the relevance of non‐HLA antibodies has become more prominent as AMR can be diagnosed in the absence of circulating DSA. Here, we assessed a single‐center cohort of 64 orthotopic heart transplant recipients transplanted between 1994 and 2014. Serum collected from patients with ≥ pAMR1 (n = 43) and non‐AMR (n = 21) were tested for reactivity against a panel of 44 non‐HLA autoantigens. The AMR group had a significantly greater percentage of patients with elevated reactivity to autoantigens compared to non‐AMR (P = .002) and healthy controls (n = 94, P < .0001). DSA‐positive AMR patients exhibited greater reactivity to autoantigens compared to DSA‐negative (P < .0001) and AMR patients with DSA and PRA > 10% were identified as the subgroup with significantly elevated responses. Reactivity to 4 antigens, vimentin, beta‐tubulin, lamin A/C, and apolipoprotein L2, was significantly different between AMR and non‐AMR patients. Moreover, increased reactivity to these antigens was associated with graft failure. These results suggest that antibodies to non‐HLA are associated with DSA‐positive AMR although their specific role in mediating allograft injury is not yet understood.     

Liver transplantation arrests and reverses muscle wasting

Muscle wasting, sarcopenia, is common in advanced cirrhosis and predicts adverse outcomes while awaiting and following liver transplantation. Frequent post‐transplant worsening of sarcopenia has attracted recent interest. It is unknown whether this serious problem is an expected metabolic consequence of transplantation or results from confounding conditions such as recurrent allograft liver disease or avoidable post‐transplant complications. To clarify this question, we studied pre‐ and post‐transplant muscle mass in a retrospective cohort of 40 patients transplanted for three diseases – alcoholic cirrhosis, non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis cirrhosis – in whom allograft disease recurrence was monitored and excluded, and who lacked common post‐transplant muscle wasting complications such as sepsis, renal failure, ischemia, and cholestasis. We measured skeletal muscle index (SMI) using computed tomography before and 12–48 months after transplant. SMI as a categorical variable significantly improved, from 18 patients above the normal cutoff pre‐transplant to 28 post‐transplant (p = 0.008). SMI increases were greatest in patients with the lowest pre‐transplant SMI (p < 0.01). As a continuous variable, mean SMI remained stable, with a non‐significant trend toward improvement. We conclude that after liver transplantation sarcopenia does not progress but is arrested and frequently improves in the absence of confounding conditions.     

Pre‐existing donor‐specific antibodies are detrimental to kidney allograft only when persistent after transplantation

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) increase the risk of allograft rejection and graft failure. They may be present before transplant or develop de novo after transplantation. Here, we studied the evolution of preformed DSA and their impact on graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients. Using the Luminex Single Antigen assay, we analyzed the sera on the day of transplantation of 239 patients who received a kidney transplant. Thirty‐seven patients (15.5%) had pre‐existing DSA detected the day of transplantation. After 5 years, the pre‐existing DSA disappeared in 22 patients whereas they persisted in 12. Variables associated with DSA persistence were age <50 years (P = 0.009), a history of previous transplantation (P = 0.039), the presence of class II DSA (P = 0.009), an MFI of preformed DSA >3500 (P < 0.001), and the presence of two or more DSA (P < 0.001). DSA persistence was associated with a higher risk of graft loss and antibody‐mediated rejection. Previously undetected preformed DSA are deleterious to graft survival only when they persist after transplantation.     

Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in patients with delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplantation affects adverse outcomes. It remains unclear whether the post‐transplant dialysis modality alters perioperative or long‐term graft outcomes. We performed a retrospective observational quality initiative at two Canadian renal transplant centers, in which DGF occurred in the recipient, necessitating one of peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD). There was no difference in baseline factors between patients with post‐transplant PD (n = 14) or HD (n = 63). The use of PD was associated with an increased risk of wound infection/leakage (PD 5/14 vs. HD 6/63, p = 0.024), shorter length of hospitalization (13.7 vs. 18.7 d, p = 0.009) and time requiring dialysis post‐operatively (6.5 vs 11.0 d, p = 0.043). There were no differences in readmission to hospital within 6 months (4/14 vs. 23/63, p = 0.759), graft loss (0/14 vs. 2/63, p = 1.000) or acute rejection episodes (1/14 vs. 4/63, p = 1.000) at one yr, and GFR did not differ between the PD or HD groups at 30 d (35.7 vs. 33.8 mL/min/m², p = 0.731), six months (46.9 vs. 45.5 mL/min/m², p = 0.835) or one yr (46.6 vs. 44.5 mL/min/m², p = 0.746). Further research is needed to determine which transplant patients are most appropriate to undergo PD catheter removal at the time of transplantation.     

Negative outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease beyond the fifth post‐transplant year

Although up to 50% of patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) resume alcohol consumption after liver transplantation (LT), numerous studies indicate that long‐term results are not compromised. This study focused on evaluating the impact of ALD on outcomes up to and beyond the fifth year after LT. Among the 432 primary LT recipients included in this study, 97 underwent transplantation for ALD. Alcohol relapse rate at 10 yr was 33.5%, with younger recipient age being the only independent predictor (p = 0.019). Survival of patients with ALD (77.0%) was similar to those without (79.0%) up to the fifth post‐transplant year (p = 0.655) but worse during the five subsequent years among the five‐yr survivors (70.6% vs. 92.9%; p = 0.002). ALD was an independent risk factor for poorer survival beyond the fifth post‐transplant year (p = 0.049), but not earlier (p = 0.717). Conversely, alcohol relapse increased the risk of death only during the first five post‐transplant years (p = 0.039). There were no significant differences regarding graft failure incidence between ALD and non‐ALD recipients up to the fifth post‐transplant year (7.3% vs. 11.6%; p = 0.255) and beyond (12.9% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.126). In conclusion, pre‐transplant diagnosis of ALD yields negative effects on post‐transplant outcomes beyond the fifth post‐transplant year, not attributable to recidivism.     

Discovery of non‐HLA antibodies associated with cardiac allograft rejection and development and validation of a non‐HLA antigen multiplex panel: From bench to bedside

We analyzed humoral immune responses to nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) after cardiac transplantation to identify antibodies associated with allograft rejection. Protein microarray identified 366 non‐HLA antibodies (>1.5 fold, P < .5) from a discovery cohort of HLA antibody–negative, endothelial cell crossmatch–positive sera obtained from 12 cardiac allograft recipients at the time of biopsy‐proven rejection. From these, 19 plasma membrane proteins and 10 autoantigens identified from gene ontology analysis were combined with 48 proteins identified through literature search to generate a multiplex bead array. Longitudinal sera from a multicenter cohort of adult cardiac allograft recipients (samples: n = 477 no rejection; n = 69 rejection) identified 18 non‐HLA antibodies associated with rejection (P < .1) including 4 newly identified non‐HLA antigenic targets (DEXI, EMCN, LPHN1, and SSB). CART analysis showed 5/18 non‐HLA antibodies distinguished rejection vs nonrejection. Antibodies to 4/18 non‐HLA antigens synergize with HLA donor‐specific antibodies and significantly increase the odds of rejection (P < .1). The non‐HLA panel was validated using an independent adult cardiac transplant cohort (n = 21 no rejection; n = 42 rejection, >1R) with an area under the curve of 0.87 (P < .05) with 92.86% sensitivity and 66.67% specificity. We conclude that multiplex bead array assessment of non‐HLA antibodies identifies cardiac transplant recipients at risk of rejection.     

Pre‐transplant immune state defined by serum markers and alloreactivity predicts acute rejection after living donor kidney transplantation

Acute rejection (AR) remains a major cause for long‐term kidney allograft failure. Reliable immunological parameters suitable to define the pre‐transplant immune state and hence the individual risk of graft rejection are highly desired to preferably adapt the immunosuppressive regimen in advance. Donor and third party alloreactivities were determined by mixed lymphocyte cultures. Soluble forms of CD25, CD30, and CD44 were detected in patients' serum by ELISA. Various lymphocyte subpopulations were measured using flow cytometry. All patients received triple immunosuppression (tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids) and were grouped according to biopsy results within the first year: rejection‐free (RF, n = 13), borderline (BL, n = 5), or acute rejection (AR, n = 7). Patients with AR showed the highest pre‐transplant alloreactivities and serum levels (sCD25/sCD30/sCD44) according to the pattern RF < BL < AR. Relying on serum analysis only, multivariate logistic regression (logit link function) yielded a prognostic score for prediction of rejection with 75.0% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity. Patients with rejection showed markedly higher pre‐transplant frequencies of CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T cells lacking CD28, but lower numbers of CD8⁺CD161^bright T cells and NK cells than RF individuals. Pre‐transplant immune state defined by alloreactivity, serum markers, and particular lymphocyte subsets seems to correlate with occurrence of graft rejection after kidney transplantation. A prognostic score based on pre‐transplant serum levels has shown great potential for prediction of rejection episodes and should be further evaluated.     

Impaired exercise capacity after lung transplantation is related to delayed recovery of muscle strength

Lung transplant recipients report reduced exercise capacity despite satisfactory graft function. We analysed changes in lung function, six‐min walk distance (6MWD), and quadriceps strength in the first 26‐wk post‐transplant and examined what factors predict 6MWD recovery. All lung transplant recipients at a single institution between June 2007 and January 2011 were considered for inclusion. Lung function, 6MWD, and quadriceps strength corrected for body weight (QS%) were recorded pre‐ and two‐, six‐, 13‐, and 26‐wk post‐transplant. Fifty recipients, of mean (±SD) age 42 (±13) yr, were studied. Mean FEV₁% and 6MWD improved from 26.4% to 88.9% and from 397 to 549 m at 26 wk, respectively (both p < 0.001). QS% declined in the first two wk but had improved to above pre‐transplant levels by 26 wk (p = 0.027). On multivariate analysis (n = 35), lower pre‐transplant exercise capacity and greater recovery in muscle strength explained most of the improvement in exercise capacity. Delayed recovery of exercise capacity after lung transplantation is unrelated to delay in improvement in graft function, but occurs secondary to the slow recovery of muscle strength. Our findings show that additional controlled trials are needed to better understand the influence of exercise rehabilitation on improvement in exercise capacity post‐transplantation.     

Early changes in scores of chronic damage on transplant kidney protocol biopsies reflect donor characteristics,but not future graft function

The amount of irreversible injury on renal allograft biopsy predicts function, but little is known about the early evolution of this damage. In a single‐center cohort, we examined the relationship between donor‐, recipient‐, and transplantation‐associated factors and change in a morphometric index of chronic damage (ICD) between protocol biopsies performed at implantation and at 2–3 months. We then investigated whether early delta ICD predicted subsequent biochemical outcomes. We found little evidence to support differences between the study group, who had undergone serial biopsies, and a contemporaneous control group, who had not. In allografts with serial biopsies (n = 162), there was an increase in ICD between implantation (median: 2%, IQR:0–8) and 2–3 months post‐transplant (median 8% IQR:4–15; p < 0.0001). Donation from younger or live donors was independently associated with smaller early post‐transplant increases in ICD. There was no evidence for a difference in delta ICD between donation after cardiac death vs. donation after brain death, nor association with length of cold ischemia. After adjustment for GFR at the time of the second biopsy, delta ICD after three months did not predict allograft function at one yr. These findings suggest that graft damage develops shortly after transplantation and reflects donor factors, but does not predict future biochemical outcomes.     

Renal outcomes of simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation compared to liver transplant alone for candidates with renal dysfunction

It is unclear whether a concomitant kidney transplant grants survival benefit to liver transplant (LT) candidates with renal dysfunction (RD). We retrospectively studied LT candidates without RD (n = 714) and LT candidates with RD who underwent either liver transplant alone (RD‐LTA; n = 103) or simultaneous liver–kidney transplant (RD‐SLKT; n = 68). RD was defined as renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement or modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD)–glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <25 mL/min/1.73 m². RD‐LTAs had worse one‐yr post‐transplant survival compared to RD‐SLKTs (79.6% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.05). However, RD‐LTA recipients more often had hepatitis C (60.2% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.004) and more severe liver disease (MELD 37.9 ± 8.1 vs. 32.7 ± 9.1, p = 0.0001). Twenty RD‐LTA recipients died in the first post‐transplant year. Evaluation of the cause and timing of death relative to native renal recovery revealed that only four RD‐LTA recipients might have derived survival benefit from RD‐SLKT. Overall, 87% of RD‐LTA patients recovered renal function within one month of transplant. One yr after RD‐LTA or RD‐SLKT, serum creatinine (1.5 ± 1.2 mg/dL vs. 1.4 ± 0.5 mg/dL, p = 0.63) and prevalence of stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD; 5.9% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.11) were comparable. Our series provides little evidence that RD‐SLKT would have yielded substantial short‐term survival benefit to RD‐LTA recipients.     

Cardiogenic shock and coronary endothelial dysfunction predict cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains one of the major causes of death post‐heart transplantation. Its etiology is multifactorial and prevention is challenging. The aim of this study was to prospectively determine factors related to cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation. This research was planned on 179 patients submitted to heart transplant. Performance of an early coronary angiography with endothelial function evaluation was scheduled at three‐month post‐transplant. Patients underwent a second coronary angiography after five‐yr follow‐up. At the 5‐ ± 2‐yr follow‐up, 43% of the patients had developed cardiac allograft vasculopathy (severe in 26% of them). Three independent predictors of cardiac allograft vasculopathy were identified: cardiogenic shock at the time of the transplant operation (OR: 6.49; 95% CI: 1.86–22.7, p = 0.003); early coronary endothelial dysfunction (OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.49–10.2, p = 0.006), and older donor age (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00–1.10, p = 0.044). Besides early endothelial coronary dysfunction and older donor age, a new predictor for development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy was identified: cardiogenic shock at the time of transplantation. In these high‐risk patient subgroups, preventive measures (treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, use of novel immunosuppressive agents such as mTOR inhibitors) should be earlier and much more aggressive.     

Comparison of alemtuzumab vs. antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in primary non‐sensitized renal transplant patients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal

Alemtuzumab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) are commonly used for induction therapy in renal transplantation. This retrospective, single‐center, cohort study evaluated cumulative incidence of one‐yr biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) among 200 consecutive primary non‐sensitized kidney transplant recipients who received either alemtuzumab (n = 100) or rATG (n = 100) induction followed by rapid steroid taper, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Protocol biopsies, plasma and urine BK virus PCR, serum creatinine and iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), were obtained at 1, 4, and 12 months from transplantation. The one‐yr BPAR rates were similar between the alemtuzumab and rATG groups; however, rejection Banff IA and higher was more common in the alemtuzumab arm (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.047). After adjusting for confounding variables, alemtuzumab was still associated with Banff IA and higher rejection (adjusted OR: 3.7, CI: 1.2–10.5, p = 0.02). Despite similar rates of BK viremia, more patients in the alemtuzumab arm developed BK nephropathy (16% vs. 3%, p = 0.046). One‐year iGFR (53.4 ± 20.2 vs. 71.9 ± 27.2 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.002) and three‐yr graft survival (89.5% vs. 95%, p = 0.05) were lower in the alemtuzumab group. In low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients on steroid‐free immunosuppression, alemtuzumab was associated with more severe rejection and BK nephropathy compared to rATG.     

Peri-operative third party red blood cell transfusion in renal transplantation and the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss

Historic red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) may induce anti-HLA antibody which, if donor specific (DSA), is associated with increased antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Whether post-operative RBCT influences this risk is unknown.We examined the RBCT history in 258 renal transplant recipients stratified according to prevalent recipient HLA antibody (DSA, Non-DSA or No Antibody).AMR occurred more frequently in patients who received RBCT both pre and post transplant compared with all other groups (Pre + Post-RBCT 21%, Pre-RBCT 4%, Post-RBCT 6%, No-RBCT 6%, HR 4.1 p = 0.004). In the 63 patients who received Pre + Post-RBCT, 65% (13/20) with DSA developed AMR compared with 0/6 in the Non-DSA group and 2/37 (5%) in the No-Antibody group (HR 13.9 p < 0.001). In patients who received No-RBCT, Pre-RBCT or Post-RBCT there was no difference in AMR between patients with DSA, Non-DSA or No-Antibody. Graft loss was independently associated with Pre + Post-RBCT (HR 6.5, p = 0.001) AMR (HR 23.9 p < 0.001) and Non-AMR (6.0 p = 0.003) after adjusting for DSA and delayed graft function.Re-exposure to RBCT at the time of transplant is associated with increased AMR only in patients with preformed DSA, suggesting that RBCT provides additional allostimulation. Patients receiving Pre + Post-RBCT also had an increased risk of graft loss independently of AMR or DSA. Both pre and post procedural RBCT in renal transplantation is associated with modification of immunological risk and warrants additional study.     

Association of cytomegalovirus infections with recurrence of humoral and cellular autoimmunity to islet autoantigens and of type 1 diabetes in a pancreas transplanted patient

Association of type 1 diabetes and cytomegalovirus (CMV) is suspected and CMV infections have also been linked to increased risk of new onset post‐transplantation diabetes. We monitored response to islet autoantigens, pancreatic endocrine function, and CMV infections in one type 1 diabetic patient receiving pancreas allograft. Time course analyses of levels of islet autoantibodies (Abs), IFN‐γ ELISPOT response, analysis of T cell function, levels of C peptide together with CMV pp65 antigenaemia and viraemia and graft biopsy histopathology were performed in comparison with a cohort of diabetic recipients. Evidence of autoimmune activation to GAD and IA2, modification of CD4⁺ CD25hi T cells, loss of pancreatic function, concomitantly with multiple CMV infections and allograft rejection with peri‐insulitis is provided. The parallel between metabolic outcome, initiation and progression of autoreactivity to islet autoantigens and early CMV infections after transplantation, suggests that persistent CMV infections may be relevant to the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes.     

Donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies are not associated with nonanastomotic biliary strictures but both are independent risk factors for graft loss after liver transplantation

Donor‐specific alloantibodies (DSA) have been associated with rejection and shorter graft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We examined the role of DSA in nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) after OLT. Patients receiving first OLT who developed NAS (n = 68) and a control group without NAS (n = 83), with pre‐OLT and 12 months post‐OLT serum samples, were included. DSA were specified using the Luminex single antigen test. Risk factors for NAS and graft survival were analyzed. The presence of preformed DSA was not significantly different between patients with NAS and controls (P = .89). After 12 months, 26.5% of NAS patients and 16.9% of controls had generated de novo DSA (P = .15). Neither de novo class I DSA nor de novo class II DSA were associated with NAS. De novo DSA generally developed after the diagnosis of NAS. Time‐dependent regression analysis identified both NAS (aHR 8.05, CI 3.28 – 19.77, P < .01) and de novo class II DSA (aHR 2.84, CI 1.38 – 5.82, P < .01) as independent risk factors for graft loss. Preformed or de novo DSA were not associated with the development of NAS. However, NAS as well as de novo class II DSA were independent risk factors for graft loss after OLT.     

Organ allocation in pediatric renal transplants: is there an optimal donor?

The 2005 revised allocation scheme for pediatric renal transplantation made the decision of whether to transplant an available living‐donor (LD) kidney or use a deceased‐donor (DD) kidney controversial. The aim of this study was to examine kidney allograft utilization, sensitization, and outcomes of pediatric transplant recipients. Between January 2000 and December 2009, 91 consecutive pediatric kidney recipients (<20 yr) were transplanted. The LD (n = 38) and DD (n = 53) groups were similar in age, gender, dialysis status at transplant, warm ischemia time, and overall patient survival. LD recipients were more likely to be Caucasian (92 vs. 69%), receive older allografts (39 ± 10 vs. 23 ± 9 yr), and have fewer human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (3.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.4 ± 1.5, p < 0.01 for all). Graft survival at one, three, and five yr post‐transplant was longer for LD recipients (97%, 91%, 87% vs. DD 89%, 79%, 58%, respectively, p < 0.05). At the time of transplant, 17 (33%) DD recipients had an available LD (mean age 40 yr). A greater proportion of all patients were moderately (PRA 21–79%) sensitized post‐transplant (p < 0.05). A multivariable analysis of graft survival indicated that the advantage in LD organs was likely due to fewer HLA mismatched in this group. Nonetheless, LD organs appear to provide optimal outcomes in pediatric renal transplants when considering the risk of becoming sensitized post‐transplant complicating later use of the LD kidney.     

Tumor biology and pre‐transplant locoregional treatments determine outcomes in patients with T3 hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis. This study was conducted to determine the impact of pre‐transplant locoregional therapy (LRT) on HCC and our institution's experience with expansion to United Network of Organ Sharing Region 4 T3 (R4T3) criteria. Two hundred and twenty‐five patients with HCC (176 meeting Milan and 49 meeting R4T3 criteria) underwent liver transplantation from 2002 to 2008. Compared with the Milan criteria, HCCs in R4T3 criteria displayed less favorable biological features such as higher median alpha‐fetoprotein level (21.9 vs. 8.5 ng/mL, p = 0.01), larger tumor size, larger tumor number, and higher incidence of microvascular invasion (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.002). As a result, patients meeting Milan criteria had better five‐yr survival (79% vs. 69%, p = 0.03) and a trend toward lower HCC recurrence rates (5% vs. 13%, p = 0.05). Pre‐transplant LRT did not affect post‐transplant outcomes in patients meeting Milan criteria but did result in lower three‐yr HCC recurrence (7% vs. 75%, p < 0.001) and better three‐yr survival (p = 0.02) in patients meeting R4T3 criteria. Tumor biology and pre‐transplant LRT are important factors that determine the post‐transplant outcomes in patients with HCC who meet R4T3 criteria.