Association of four DNA polymorphisms with acute rejection after kidney transplantation

Renal transplant outcomes exhibit large inter-individual variability, possibly on account of genetic variation in immune-response mediators and genes influencing the pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants. We examined 21 polymorphisms from 10 genes in 237 de novo renal transplant recipients participating in an open-label, multicenter study [Cyclosporine Avoidance Eliminates Serious Adverse Renal-toxicity (CAESAR)] investigating renal function and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) with different cyclosporine A regimens and mycophenolate mofetil. Genes were selected for their immune response and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic relevance and were tested for association with BPAR. Four polymorphisms were significantly associated with BPAR. The ABCB1 2677T allele tripled the odds of developing BPAR (OR: 3.16, 95% CI [1.50–6.67]; P  =   0.003), as did the presence of at least one IMPDH2 3757C allele (OR: 3.39, 95% CI [1.42–8.09]; P  =   0.006). BPAR was almost fivefold more likely in patients homozygous for IL-10 -592A (OR: 4.71, 95% CI [1.52–14.55]; P  =   0.007) and twice as likely in patients with at least one A allele of TNF-α G-308A (OR: 2.18, 95% CI [1.08–4.41]; P  =   0.029). There were no statistically significant interactions between polymorphisms, or the different treatment regimens. Variation in genes of immune response and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic relevance may be important in understanding acute rejection after renal transplant.     

Validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients using a large multi-center cohort

There have been numerous reports proposing a statistically significant association between a genetic variant, usually in the form of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and acute rejection (AR). Unfortunately, there are additional publications reporting a lack of association with AR when a different cohort of recipients was analyzed for the same SNP. The objective of this report was to attempt replication of these published finding in our own kidney allograft recipient cohort. We analyzed 23 genetic variants, previously reported to have a significant association with AR, using a cohort of 969 clinically well-defined kidney transplant recipients. Only one SNP, rs6025 (Leiden mutation), within the coagulation factor V gene, showed a significant association with a P-value of 0.011 in a race-adjusted analysis and a P-value of 0.0003 in multiple variable analysis. An additional SNP, rs11706052 in IMPDH2, gave a modest P-value of 0.044 using multiple variable analysis, which is not significant when multiple testing is taken into consideration. Our results suggest that careful validation of previously reported associations with AR is necessary, and different strategies other than candidate gene studies can help to identify causative genetic variants associated with AR.     

The therapeutic challenge of late antibody‐mediated kidney allograft rejection

Late antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) is a cardinal cause of kidney allograft failure, manifesting as a continuous and, in contrast with early rejection, often clinically silent alloimmune process. While significant progress has been made towards an improved understanding of its molecular mechanisms and the definition of diagnostic criteria, there is still no approved effective treatment. In recent small randomized controlled trials, therapeutic strategies with promising results in observational studies, such as proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, anti‐C5 antibody eculizumab, or high dose intravenous immunoglobulin plus rituximab, had no significant impact in late and/or chronic ABMR. Such disappointing results reinforce a need of new innovative treatment strategies. Potential candidates may be the interference with interleukin‐6 to modulate B cell alloimmunity, or innovative compounds that specifically target antibody‐producing plasma cells, such as antibodies against CD38. Given the phenotypic heterogeneity of ABMR, the design of adequate systematic trials to assess the safety and efficiency of such therapies, however, is challenging. Several trials are currently being conducted, and new developments will hopefully provide us with effective ways to counteract the deleterious impact of antibody‐mediated graft injury. Meanwhile, the weight of evidence would suggest that, when approaching using existing treatments for established antibody‐mediated rejection, “less may be more”.     

Genetic association of FOXP3 gene polymorphisms with allograft rejection in renal transplant patients

Aim: FOXP3 gene is known to be important for regulatory T cell development and function, and is associated with the rejection of human kidney transplants. The present study was therefore conducted to determine the effect of FOXP3 polymorphisms on allograft rejection in renal transplant recipients. Methods: A total of 166 adult patients were categorized into either a Rejection group (65 patients) or a No rejection group (101 patients). Rs3761547, rs3761548 and rs2232365 variant alleles in the FOXP3 gene were genotyped using a TaqMan probe technique, and their relationships with rejection were investigated. Results: There was no significant difference in the genotype frequencies of rs3761547 and rs2232365 variants between patients with and without rejection history (P > 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the rs3761548 AA genotype carriers were associated with about a fourfold greater risk for rejection compared with CC genotype (5 years post‐transplant: odds ratio 3.95, 95% confidence interval 1.27–12.29, P = 0.018). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a lower mean time to the first rejection in rs3761548 AA compared with CC genotype patients (Log rank = 4.303, P = 0.038). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that rs3761548 AA genotype carriers have up to about a twofold (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.17–4.80, P = 0.017) higher risk for rejection than CC carriers. Conclusion: Our study suggests an association between FOXP3 rs3761548 polymorphisms and allograft rejection in renal transplantation. This association should be further proven in large prospective studies because of the small sample size and confounding factors in this retrospective study.     

Validation of genetic variants associated with early acute rejection in kidney allograft transplantation

Numerous reports have identified genetic variants associated with kidney transplant outcome, but only a few have been validated in subsequent studies. We analyzed the association of 21 previously reported genetic variants associated with acute rejection (AR), in an effort to validate these associations in our kidney transplant population. All recipients (n = 585) received Ab induction, rapid discontinuation of prednisone, and calcineurin inhibitors with either mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Both univariate analysis and logistic regression were used for determining the association between the genotypes and AR. Univariate analysis detected one significant single-nucleotide polymorphism (p = 0.03), rs1801133, within the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene associated with AR. Logistic regression analysis identified two variants associated with AR, the 32-bp deletion within chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 gene (rs333) and the p.222A/V variant (rs1801133) within the MTHFR gene. Although our analysis utilized a much larger cohort than used in previous reports, we were only able to detect an association with two of these variants. The lack of validation for the other 19 variants may be due to the small effect size, or that, they are not associated with AR. These results stress the need for larger cohorts for both future studies as well as for validation studies.     

Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil can effectively reverse C4d-positive steroid-resistant acute rejection in Chinese renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been suggested to play a critical role in the reversal of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) in renal transplantation, but the efficacy of using only TAC-MMF without immunoadsorption or plasmapheresis has not been investigated. On the other hand, Chinese recipients of renal grafts usually need lower doses of immunosuppressants, and their optimal treatment for acute humoral rejection has not been established. METHODS: Since 1999, we have used TAC-MMF to treat steroid-resistant acute rejection (AR). C4d staining was retrospectively performed in 32 patients with steroid-resistant AR, and the treatments of 19 patients with C4d-positive steroid-resistant AR were investigated. RESULTS: Thirteen of 19 patients received TAC-MMF treatment only; 11 episodes of rejection in them were reversed (7 completely, 4 partially) and only 2 recipients lost their graft. Another 6 patients received immunoadsorption also. One of them failed to respond and lost her graft. Four of 5 patients treated with immunoadsorption and TAC-MMF recovered (3 completely, 1 partially), but 3 of them had severe pneumonia, a complication rate statistically higher than in patients treated with only TAC-MMF (P<0.05). AR occurring during the first two weeks after transplantation had a statistically better outcome than that occurring later (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the combination of TAC and MMF is a potentially safe and economic treatment for most Chinese renal allograft recipients with C4d-positive steroid-resistant AR, especially for rejections developing within the first two weeks after transplantation.     

C1q binding is not an independent risk factor for kidney allograft loss after an acute antibody‐mediated rejection episode: a retrospective cohort study

After kidney transplantation, C4d is an incomplete marker of acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and C1q‐binding donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) have been associated with allograft survival. However, the impact on allograft survival of C1q+ DSA after clinical AMR has not been studied yet. We analysed retrospectively in clinical AMR C4d staining and C1q‐binding impact on allograft survival. We compared clinical, histological and serological features of C4d− and C4d+ AMR, C1q+ and C1q− DSA AMR and analysed C4d and C1q‐binding impact on allograft survival. Among 500 for‐cause kidney allograft biopsies, 48 fulfilled AMR criteria. C4d+ AMR [N = 18 (37.5%)] have significantly higher number class I DSA (P = 0.02), higher microvascular score (P = 0.02) and more transplant glomerulopathy (P = 0.04). C1q+ AMR [N = 20 (44%)] presented with significantly more class I and class II DSA (P = 0.005 and 0.04) and C4d+ staining (P = 0.01). Graft losses were significantly higher in the C4d+ group (P = 0.04) but similar in C1q groups. C4d+ but not C1q+ binding was an independent risk factor for graft loss [HR = 2.65; (1.11–6.34); P = 0.028]. In our cohort of clinical AMR, C4d+ staining but not C1q+ binding is an independent risk factor for graft loss. Allograft loss and patient survival were similar in C1q+ and C1q− AMR.     

肾移植一年后急性排斥反应时移植肾组织中C4d表达阳性的临床研究

目的 观察肾移植1年后发生急性排斥反应时移植肾组织中补体片段C4d的表达情况,分析其对移植肾功能及预后的影响.方法 选择肾移植时间超过1年,临床诊断为急性排斥反应并经病理穿刺活检证实的肾移植受者36例为研究对象.以第1例受者移植肾组织穿刺时间为观察起点(2006年3月),以此项研究结束时间为观察终点(2010年4月).应用C4d多克隆抗体对移植肾穿刺组织行免疫组织化学染色,检测C4d在移植肾组织中的表达情况;根据检测结果,分为C4d阳性组和阴性组,分析和比较两组在观察时间段内移植肾功能的变化及存活时间.结果 在36例受者的移植肾穿刺标本中,C4d阳性16例(44.4%),C4d阴性20例(55.6%);C4d阳性组和阴性组移植肾组织中嗜酸性粒细胞浸润数量分别为(9.4±4.5)个和(2.6±1.8)个,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).在观察时间段内,所有受者血清肌酐均有不同程度上升,但C4d阳性组上升幅度与C4d阴性组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);C4d阳性组和C4d阴性组受者移植肾功能丧失率分别为31.3%(5/16)和30.0%(6/20),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).C4d阳性组和C4d阴性组受者移植肾穿刺后的巾位存活时间分别为(19.3±5.3)个月和(22.5±7.4)个月,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 肾移植1年后发生急性排斥反应时,移植肾组织中C4d表达阳性对其功能及存活时间无明显影响.     

HLA‐G on peripheral blood CD4+ T lymphocytes: a potential predictor for acute renal rejection

HLA‐G Expression in grafts and serum has been shown to improve graft acceptance. However, its expression on peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) during acute rejection (AR) remains unknown. In this study, we serially monitored HLA‐G expression on CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ PBLs of 66 recipients undergoing renal transplantation using flow cytometry at different time points before and after transplantation, as well as during AR episode. In stable recipients, HLA‐G expression on CD4⁺ PBLs declined during the first week after transplantation and increased continuously with immunosuppressive therapy. Then, expression declined gradually after 1 month and remained at a higher level compared with pretransplantation. When AR occurred, HLA‐G expression decreased significantly compared with the stable level. In three recipients suffering from recurrent rejection, it remained at a low level despite impact immunosuppressive treatment. With mix lymphocyte assay, HLA‐G⁺ CD4⁺ T cells showed inhibitory role on proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell. HLA‐G expression on CD8⁺ PBLs was almost undetectable at different time points in the recipients and healthy controls. Our results suggest that HLA‐G on CD4⁺ PBLs might provide a potential marker for the early diagnosis of renal AR and for the immunosuppressive status of recipients.     

Early clinical experience using donor‐derived cell‐free DNA to detect rejection in kidney transplant recipients

Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) became Medicare reimbursable in the United States in October 2017 for the detection of rejection in kidney transplant recipients based on results from its pivotal validation trial, but it has not yet been externally validated. We assessed 63 adult kidney transplant recipients with suspicion of rejection with dd‐cfDNA and allograft biopsy. Of these, 27 (43%) patients had donor–specific antibodies and 34 (54%) were found to have rejection by biopsy. The percentage of dd‐cfDNA was higher among patients with antibody–mediated rejection (ABMR; median 1.35%; interquartile range [IQR]: 1.10%‐1.90%) compared to those with no rejection (median 0.38%, IQR: 0.26%‐1.10%; P < .001) and cell–mediated rejection (CMR; median: 0.27%, IQR: 0.19%‐1.30%; P = .01). The dd‐cfDNA test did not discriminate patients with CMR from those without rejection. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CMR was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.17‐0.66). For ABMR, the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71‐0.93) and a dd‐cfDNA ≥0.74% yielded a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 71.8%, PPV 68.6%, and NPV 100%. The dd‐cfDNA test did not discriminate CMR from no rejection among kidney transplant recipients, although performance characteristics were stronger for the discrimination of ABMR.     

Genetic polymorphisms in IL‐2, IL‐10, TGF‐β1, and IL‐2RB and acute rejection in renal transplant patients

Acute rejection (AR) remains a concern for kidney transplantation. Cytokines are key mediators in the induction and effector phases of all immune and inflammatory responses. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in cytokines and their receptors may relate to AR. We investigated the relation between AR and SNPs in the genes encoding for IL‐2(–330G>T), IL‐10(?592C>A and ?1082G>A), TGF‐β1(915G>C), and IL‐2RB(rs228942 C>A and rs228953 C>T) in 325 renal transplant patients during the first year after transplantation. The overall incidence of AR was 15.4%. In multivariate analysis, only the use of induction therapy was correlated with AR (odds ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.1–3.7; p = 0.04). No statistically significant associations between the SNPs studied and AR were observed. SNPs in the investigated cytokines and their receptors were not associated with the risk of AR. Genotyping patients for these SNPs is unlikely to aid the clinician in adjusting the immunosuppressive therapy for individual patients.     

Association of high anti-donor alloreactivity and low frequency of FoxP3-expressing cells prior to kidney transplantation with acute graft rejection

Acute rejection (AR) is an important factor for the development of chronic allograft dysfunction following kidney Tx. Identification of patients who would benefit from closer clinical surveillance to allow individual tailoring of immunosuppression and hence reducing the rate of AR is highly desired. Aim of this study was to investigate the association of pre-transplant alloreactivity and frequency of regulatory T cells (T(regs) ) with AR following living-donor kidney Tx. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from 40 patients prior to Tx. T-cell alloreactivity against donor and third-party antigen was assessed by proliferative responses in mixed lymphocyte culture and enzyme linked immunospot technique. Pre-transplant frequency of CD4(+) CD25(+) CD127(low) FoxP3(+) T(regs) was determined by flow cytometry. Experimental data were correlated with occurrence of AR. We found that patients with rejection-free (RF) post-Tx courses showed significantly lower pre-transplant alloreactivity to donor antigen compared to individuals with borderline findings (BL) or AR. For RF patients, the proliferative T-cell responses to third-party antigen were significantly higher than for stimulation with donor cells whereas lymphocytes of the AR group showed the inverse pattern. A significantly higher expression of FoxP3 within the CD4(+) CD25(+) CD127(low) subset for RF and BL compared to the AR group was observed. In conclusion, pre-transplant anti-donor alloreactivity and FoxP3 expression within the CD4(+) CD25(+) CD127(low) subpopulation might prove useful to further define the patient's risk for AR.     

Measurement of CD4+ T‐cell function in predicting allograft rejection and recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Hashimoto K, Miller C, Hirose K, Diago T, Aucejo F, Quintini C, Eghtesad B, Corey R, Yerian L, Lopez R, Zein N, Fung J. Measurement of CD4+ T‐cell function in predicting allograft rejection and recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01169.x
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be difficult to distinguish from acute cellular rejection (ACR) following liver transplantation. The Cylex Immune Function Assay (ImmuKnow) provides objective measure of recipient’s immune function. The goal is to assess the ability of this assay to distinguish these similar conditions. A retrospective review was performed in 54 recipients with HCV. ImmuKnow assays were measured with allograft biopsies. Levels of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release from CD4+ T cells (ng/mL) were compared with the following biopsy result classifications: 365 ± 130 with ACR (n = 11), 152 ± 100 with recurrent HCV (n = 26), 240 ± 71 with normal biopsies (n = 12), and 157 ± 130 with overlapping features of ACR and recurrent HCV (n = 5). Recipients with recurrent HCV had lower immune response than those with ACR (p < 0.0001).Using a cutoff level of 220, the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing two conditions were 88.5% and 90.9%, respectively. When recipients with overlapping features had low immune response, three of four recipients’ subsequent biopsies showed recurrent HCV. In conclusion, the ImmuKnow assay can be a sensitive and specific additional test for distinguishing recurrent HCV from ACR and may be useful for predicting which recipients may be most vulnerable to recurrent HCV.     

Isolated v‐lesion represents a benign phenotype of vascular rejection of the kidney allograft – a retrospective study

While the detrimental impact of the humoral acute vascular rejection (AVR) phenotype is recognized, the prognostic significance of isolated v‐lesion (IV) remains unclear. In this retrospective single‐centre study, AVR was found in 98 of 1015 patients (9.7%) who had undergone kidney transplantation in 2010–2014, with donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) evaluated in all of them. The outcome of four AVR phenotypes was evaluated during median follow‐up of 59 months; in 25 patients with IV, 18 with T‐cell‐mediated vascular rejection (TCMVR), 19 with antibody‐mediated vascular rejection (AMVR) and 36 with suspected antibody‐mediated rejection (sAMVR). AVR was diagnosed mainly by for‐cause biopsy (81%) early after transplantation (median 19 POD) and appeared as mild‐grade intimal arteritis. IV occurred in low‐sensitized patients after the first transplantation (96%) in the absence of DSA. IV responded satisfactorily to treatment (88%), showed no persistence of rejection in surveillance biopsy, and had stable graft function, minimal proteinuria and excellent DCGS (96%). Contrary to that, Kaplan–Meier estimate of 3‐year DCGS of AMVR was 66% (log‐rank = 0.0004). Early IV represents a benign phenotype of AVR with a favourable outcome. This study prompts further research to evaluate the nature of IV before considering any change in the classification and management.     

The relationship between adenosine triphosphate within CD4(+) T lymphocytes and acute rejection after liver transplantation

Dong J‐Y, Yin H, Li R‐D, Ding G‐S, Fu Z‐R, Wu Y‐M, Wang Z‐X. The relationship between adenosine triphosphate within CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and acute rejection after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E292–E296. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: There have been increasing interests in the relationship between CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and acute rejection (AR) in transplantation. In this study, we explore the role of CD4⁺ T lymphocytes after liver transplantation. Methods: From February to October 2009, 87 patients underwent liver transplantation. They were divided into the AR group and non‐acute rejection (NAR) group, with 56 healthy individuals in the control group. Blood specimens were collected preoperatively and at one, two, and four wk postoperatively for all groups and also on the day when AR occurred and one wk after intravenous glucocorticoid therapy for the AR group. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels were measured using the ImmuKnow? test kits for immune cell functions. Results: After transplantation, the ATP levels within CD4⁺ T lymphocytes were significantly elevated in the two groups when compared with the preoperative levels. It peaked in the AR group and was significantly higher than that of the NAR group (p < 0.05). By ROC curve analysis, the obvious elevation of the ATP value one wk after transplantation had better sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing the AR. The ATP sensitivity rate for early AR was 85.7% and specificity rate 80.9% when the cutoff value was 407 μg/L. The ATP value collected on the day of AR occurrence has apparently positive correlation with the rejection acting index (RAI) (p < 0.01). After the intravenous glucocorticoid therapy, all the ARs were reversed and the ATP value declined significantly compared with the control group and that on the day when AR occurred (p < 0.01). Conclusions: During the early postoperative period (especially at first week after liver transplantation), the elevation of ATP levels within CD4⁺ T lymphocytes has good sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing the AR at early stage. And the degree of AR has positive relationship with ATP value. After the intravenous glucocorticoid therapy, the obvious declination of AR might be used in evaluating the effectiveness of anti‐rejection treatment.     

Association studies of cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily E,polypeptide 1 (CYP2E1) gene polymorphisms with acute rejection in kidney transplantation recipients

Recent studies have shown that single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are associated with allograft rejection in kidney transplantation recipients. We evaluated the possible association between SNPs of the cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily E, polypeptide 1 (CYP2E1) gene, and acute rejection (AR) among renal transplant patients in a Korean population. We conducted a case–control association study in 63 AR and 284 non‐AR kidney transplant recipients. The SNPs of CYP2E1 were genotyped by direct sequencing. Recipient sex (p = 0.023) and the use of tacrolimus (p = 0.017) were significantly different between the two groups. The use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antibody induction therapy was significantly lower in the AR group. Multiple logistic regression models (codominant, dominant, recessive, and log‐additive models) adjusted by sex and type of immunosuppressive regimens were applied to determine the odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p‐values. The rs2515641 of CYP2E1 showed significant differences between the AR patient group and non‐AR group (p = 0.003, OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.37–4.75 in the codominant 1 model; p = 0.002, OR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.43–4.77 in the dominant model; p = 0.0035, OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.29–3.50 in the log‐additive model). The allele of the rs2515641 SNP also showed a significant association (p = 0.004, OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.24–3.21). This study suggests that the CYP2E1 polymorphism may be related to the development of AR in Korean kidney transplantation recipients.