Can an Extended Right Lobe be Harvested from a Donor with Gilbert's Syndrome for Living-Donor Liver Transplantation? Case Report

Gilbert's syndrome (GS) is a common cause of inherited benign unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia that occurs in the absence of overt hemolysis, other liver function test abnormalities, and structural liver disease. GS may not affect a patient's selection for living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Between February 2005 and April 2011, 446 LDLT procedures were performed at our institution. Two of the 446 living liver donors were diagnosed with GS. Both donors underwent extended right hepatectomies, and donors and recipients experienced no problem in the postoperative period. Their serum bilirubin levels returned to the normal range within 1-2 weeks postoperatively. In our opinion, extended right hepatectomy can be performed safely in living liver donors with GS if appropriate conditions are met and remnant volume is >30%. Livers with GS can be used successfully as grafts in LDLT recipients.     

Liver transplantation using donors with Gilbert syndrome

Serum bilirubin level is an essential factor included in the first step in evaluating living liver donor candidates. Our evaluation strategy was examined in living donors with possible Gilbert's syndrome (GS). When donor candidates had hyperbilirubinemia (>1.5 mg/dl), but otherwise normal liver function tests, their genomic DNA was isolated from leukocytes. They were diagnosed with GS when they had mutations of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1 typical to GS. The donors and recipients were divided into two groups: GS donors and their recipients (n = 6, each) and non-GS donors and their recipients (n = 65). All GS donors and their recipients had an unremarkable postoperative course. Total bilirubin levels of the recipients of GS donors were higher than those of recipients of non-GS donors. Living donor liver transplantation is safe for both donors with GS and their recipients.     

Outcome of donors with a remnant liver volume of less than 35% after right hepatectomy.

To overcome the barrier of size match, right lobe graft has been widely used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We assessed donor outcome, with a focus on remnant liver volume (RLV) after right hepatectomy based on the experiences of 2 LDLT centers, as a means of guiding the establishment of safe RLV limits for donor right hepatectomy. Between January 2002 and December 2003, a consecutive 146 liver donors who underwent right hepatectomy with at least 12 months of follow-up were enrolled in this study. Donors were grouped into 2 groups according to RLV: group 1 (n = 74), <35% (range, 26.9-34.9) and group 2 (n = 72), > or = 35% (35.0-46.8). No donors died or suffered a life-threatening complication. Mean peak serum postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (IU/L) levels were 219.5 +/- 79.9 and 231.5 +/- 83.3 in group 1 and 210.3 +/- 81.6 and 225.8 +/- 93.0 in group 2 (P = 0.497 and 0.699), respectively. Mean peak serum total bilirubin (TB) (mg/dL) level in group 1 (3.4 +/- 1.6) was higher than in group 2 (2.8 +/- 1.4; P = 0.023). Overall 23 (15.8%) major morbidities, 10 in group 1 (13.5%) and 13 in group 2 (18.1%), occurred according to Clavien's system (P = 0.939). These included bleeding (n = 3 in group 1 and n = 6 in group 2; P = 0.282), ileus (n = 3 and 1; P = 0.324), biliary leakage (n = 4 and 4; P = 0.968), and pneumonia (n = 0 and 2; P = 0.149). Minor morbidities were also comparable in the 2 groups. In conclusion, the outcome of donors with an RLV of <35% was not different from that of donors with an RLV of > or = 35%, with the exception of transient cholestasis. Therefore, a remnant RLV of <35% does not appear to be a contraindication for right liver procurement in living donors.     

Difficulty in sustaining hepatic outflow in left lobe but not right lobe living donor liver transplantation

Shirouzu Y, Ohya Y, Hayashida S, Asonuma K, Inomata Y. Difficulty in sustaining hepatic outflow in left lobe but not right lobe living donor liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 625–632. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Hepatic outflow block is one of the major complications leading to severe graft dysfunction after left lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: Medical records of 46 recipients of a left lobe LDLT were reviewed. The method of outflow reconstruction and post‐transplant morphological changes of hepatic veins were investigated. The subjects were followed up until September 2008, with a median follow‐up period of 2.0 yr (range: 0.5–5.9 yr). Results: There were no multiple outflow tracts to be reconstructed, and the median caliber of the single orifices with or without venoplasty was 32.0 mm. The difference between the angle of hepatic veins to the sagittal plane measured on computed tomography was calculated for pre‐operative donors and post‐operative recipients a month after LDLT. Both left and middle hepatic veins showed a significantly greater change in angle than the right hepatic vein. Both left and middle hepatic veins more frequently showed a nearly flat wave form on Doppler study one month after LDLT. In the 46 recipients of left lobe grafts, three developed outflow block (6.5%). Conclusions: The middle and left hepatic veins tend to distort and stretch during graft regeneration. These characteristics seem to be associated with outflow disturbances.     

Hypophosphatemia in living liver donors

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Some patients who undergo donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation develop hypophosphatemia postoperatively. Since this imbalance appears to be a factor in postoperative complications, some authors advocate routine supratherapeutic phosphorus repletion. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of hypophosphatemia after elective donor lobectomy for liver transplantation and to assess whether phosphorus repletion is necessary in this patient group. METHODS: The cases of 26 patients who donated 19 right lobe and seven left lateral lobe grafts between August 2004 and March 2005 were evaluated. Postoperative phosphorus levels and other relevant data were obtained from our institution's transplant database. Presence/severity of hypophosphatemia was categorized as follows: normal (>2.5 mg/dL), mild (1.5 to 2.5 mg/dL), moderate (1.1 to 1.5 mg/dL), and profound (<1.0 mg/dL). RESULTS: No patients undergoing donor hepatectomy suffered profound or life-threatening hypophosphatemia and no donor required hyperalimentation for phosphate repletion. Twenty one donors (80.7%) did not have postoperative hypophosphatemia. In addition there appears to be no increased morbidity related to hypophosphatemia. A left lateral segment donor (3.8%) had moderate hypophosphatemia that alleviated with oral intake gradually. Four patients (15.5%; three of right lobe donor, one of left lateral segment donor) had mild hypophosphatemia. We also appropriately corrected the hypophosphatemia with encouragement of normal oral intake. By postoperative day 5, essentially all donor phosphorus levels were corrected to normal range. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that hypophosphatemia after donor hepatectomy is not as common as previously reported. We find that appropriate early oral intake postoperatively effectively prevents/minimizes hypophosphatemia in patients who undergo donor hepatectomy.     

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe grafts.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report their experience with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using extended right lobe grafts for adult patients under high-urgency situations. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The efficacy of LDLT in the treatment of children has been established. The major limitation of adult-to-adult LDLT is the adequacy of the graft size. A left lobe graft from a relatively small volunteer donor will not meet the metabolic demand of a larger recipient. METHODS: From May 1996 to November 1996, seven LDLTs, using extended right lobe grafts, were performed under high-urgency situations. All recipients were in intensive care units before transplantation with five having acute renal failure, three on mechanical ventilation, and all with hepatic encephalopathy. The median body weight for the donors and recipients was 58 kg (range, 41-84 kg) and 65 kg (range, 53-90 kg), respectively. The body weights of four donors were less than those of the corresponding recipients, and the lowest donor-to-recipient body weight ratio was 0.62:1. The extended right lobe graft was chosen because the left lobe volume was <40% of the ideal liver mass of the recipient. RESULTS: Median blood loss for the donors was 900 mL (range, 700-1600 mL) and hospital stay was 19 days (range, 8-22 days). Homologous blood transfusion was not required. Two donors had complications (one incisional hernia and one bile duct stricture) requiring reoperation after discharge. All were well with normal liver function 5 to 10 months after surgery. The graft weight ranged from 490 g to 1140 g. All grafts showed immediate function with normalization of prothrombin time and recovery of conscious state of the recipients. There was no vascular complication, but six recipients required reoperation. One recipient died of systemic candidiasis 16 days after transplantation and 6 (86%) were alive with the original graft at a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range, 5-10 months). CONCLUSIONS: When performed by a team with experience in hepatectomy and transplantation, LDLT, using an extended right lobe graft, can achieve superior results. The technique extends the success of LDLT from pediatric recipients to adult recipients and opens a new donor pool for adults to receive a timely graft of adequate function.     

成人——成人间活体右半肝移植

目的 报道对高度紧急的成人终末期肝病患者进行活体右半肝移植的经验。病人及方法 自１９９６年５月到１９９８年８月;对１５例高度紧急的成人终末期肝末期肝病患者进行了活体右半肝移植。１３例术前在重症监护病房,２例因肝病的并发症而住院。     

Liver transplantation for HBsAg‐positive recipients using grafts from HBsAg‐positive deceased donors

This study reports our experience using deceased donor liver grafts from HBsAg‐positive donors. We performed eight cases of liver transplantation (LT) using grafts from deceased HBsAg‐positive donors between November 2005 and October 2010. The median age of donors was 48 years (range: 26–64). HBV DNA in the serum of donors ranged from 44 to 395 IU/ml, but HBeAg in all donors was negative. Preoperative laboratory and liver biopsy samples revealed the absence of definitive cirrhotic features and hepatitis. All recipients showed HBsAg positive preoperatively except one patient with HBsAg(?) status post previous LT for HBV related liver cirrhosis. The median age was 60 years (range: 46–76) at LT. Post‐LT antiviral management consisted of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and antiviral nucleos(t)ide analogues. The median follow‐up period was 25.5 months (range: 14–82). Of eight recipients, two recipients experienced serum HBsAg and HBV DNA disappearance postoperatively. Three recipients died of HBV‐unrelated causes. The remaining five recipients were stable with normal liver function and no marked pathologic changes on follow‐up biopsies. This experience shows that LT using grafts from deceased HBsAg‐positive donors is feasible, and may represent a valuable expansion of the pool of organ donors with appropriate antiviral management and monitoring.     

Right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: For the sake of donor safety in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the left lobe is currently being used most often for the graft. However, size mismatch has been a major obstacle for an expansion of the indication for LDLT to larger-size recipients, because a left lobe graft is not safe enough for them. METHODS: In 1998, LDLT using a right lobe graft was introduced and performed on 26 recipients to overcome the small-for-size problem. The right lobe, which does not include the middle hepatic vein of the donor, was used. Initially, indication for right lobe LDLT was basically defined as an estimated left lobe graft volume/recipient body weight ratio (GRWR) of <0.8%, which was later raised to <1.0%. RESULTS: All the donors recovered from the operation without persistent complications. Two donors with transient bile leakage were successfully treated with a conservative approach. A right lobectomy resulted in more blood loss (337+/-175 ml), and a longer operative time (6.67+/-0.85 hr) than a lateral segmentectomy, but not a left lobectomy. Grafts with a GRWR >0.8% were implanted in all recipients, except for two, who received relatively smaller right lobes (GRWR of 0.68% and 0.66%). In one of these two, the right lobe from the donor was used as the orthotopic auxiliary graft. Postoperative transitory increases in total bilirubin and aspartate transaminoferase for right lobe donors were higher than those for the left lateral segmentectomy. Nineteen recipients (73.1%) were successfully treated with this procedure. The causes of death were not specific for right lobe LDLT, except for one patient with a graft that had multiple hepatic venous orifices. These multiple and separate anastomoses of the hepatic veins caused an outflow block as a result of a positional shift of the graft, which finally led to graft loss. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that right lobe grafting is a safe and effective procedure, resulting in the expansion of the indication for LDLT to large-size recipients. How to deal with the possible variation in the anatomy of the right lobe graft should be given attention throughout the procedure.     

Safety of donor right hepatectomy without abdominal drainage: a prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive liver donors.

Although the role of routine abdominal drainage after liver resection for tumors has been questioned, abdominal drainage after donor right hepatectomy for live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been a routine practice in most transplant centers. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety of the procedure without abdominal drainage. A prospective study was performed on 100 consecutive liver donors who underwent right hepatectomy for LDLT from July 2000 to September 2003. Biliary anatomy was carefully studied with intraoperative cholangiography using fluoroscopy. The middle hepatic vein was included in the graft in all except 1 patient. Parenchymal transection was performed using an ultrasonic dissector. The right hepatic duct was transected at the hilum and the stump was closed with 6-O polydioxanone continuous suture. Absence of bile leakage was confirmed with methylene blue solution instilled through the cystic duct stump. The abdomen was closed after careful hemostasis without drainage in all donors. The median age of the donors was 36 years (range 18-56 years). Median operative blood loss and operating time were 350 mL (range 42-1,400 mL) and 7.5 hours (range 5.2-10.7 hours), respectively. None of the donors required any blood or blood product transfusion. There was no operative mortality. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 5-30 days). Postoperative morbidity occurred in 19 patients (19%), most of which were minor complications. No donor experienced bile leakage, intraabdominal bleeding, or collection. None required surgical, radiologic, or endoscopic intervention for postoperative complications, except for 1 donor who developed late biliary stricture that required endoscopic dilatation. All donors were well with a median follow-up of 32 months (range 11-50 months). In conclusion, with detailed study of the biliary anatomy and meticulous surgical technique, donor right hepatectomy can be safely performed without abdominal drainage. Abdominal drainage is not a mandatory procedure after donor hepatectomy in LDLT.     

��ǻ���������ֲ������ȡ����Ҫ�㼰���ۣ���12�����棩

??The application and surgical technique of laparoscopic hepatectomy in living donor liver transplantation??A report of 12 cases WU Hong, YANG Jia-yin, WEI Yong-gang, et al. Department of Liver Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041,China
Corresponding author: ZENG Yong, E-mail??zengyong@medmail.com.cn
Abstract Objective To evaluate the application and surgical technique of laparoscopic hepatectomy in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods The clinical data of 12 cases of laparoscopic hepatectomy in LDLT performed from September 2015 to October 2016 in Department of Liver Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University were analyzed retrospectively. The surgical outcomes and short-term prognosis of the donors (12 cases) and recipients (12 cases) were analyzed. Results Among the 12 donors, right hemihepatectomy without middle hepatic vein was performed in 6 cases; left lateral lobectomy in 3 cases and left hemihepatectomy without middle hepatic vein in 3 cases. The median intraoperative blood loss was 400 mL (ranging from 100 to 600 mL). The median hospital stay of the donors was 7 days (ranging from 4 to 10 days). All donors had no postoperative complications and deaths. Among the 12 recipients, the median graft-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 0.94% (ranging from 0.54% to 3.70%). The median surgical duration was 625 min (ranging from 405 to 720 min). The median intraoperative blood loss of the recipients was 750 mL (ranging from 200 to 3000 mL). The median hospital stay of the donors was 20 days (ranging from 7 to 40 days). One case had gastrointestinal bleeding in postoperative day 7 and the bleeding stopped after conservative treatment. One case died from respiratory failure in postoperative day 8. The other recipients were discharged smoothly. Conclusion With the improved surgical techniques and advanced laparoscopic instruments, it is believed that laparoscopic LDLT is a feasible technique and has a promising prospect.     

Factors associated with hyperbilirubinemia after living donor hepatectomy

Purpose

Increased serum bilirubin levels are common after living-donor hepatectomy. Little information is available on the characteristics and clinical significance of serum bilirubin levels soon after donor hepatectomy.

Materials and Methods

Since September 2001, we performed 229 living donor hepatectomies for living-donor liver transplantations. The 128 men and 101 women had a mean age of 34.4 ± 8.9 years (range, 19-66). Most donors were parents (n = 110; 48%). We transplanted 110 right lobes, 46 left lobes, and 73 left lateral segments. Donors were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 consisted of 181 donors who showed total bilirubin levels of <3 mg/dL, and group 2, 48 donors with levels of ≥3 mg/dL on postoperative day 3. Preoperative total bilirubin level, ratio of preoperatively estimated remnant liver volume, surgical duration, gender, age, graft type, blood transfusions, and preoperative liver biopsy findings were evaluated as risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia.

Results

The mean postoperative maximum total bilirubin level was 2.26 ± 1.49 mg/dL (range, 0.36-9.9). Remnant liver volume <40%, preoperative bilirubin levels >1 mg/dL, right lobe donor hepatectomy, male donor, and abnormal liver biopsy findings were significant risk factors for postoperative hyperbilirubinemia (P = .015, P = .02, P < .01, P = .008, and P = .023 respectively). Also donor age >50 years showed a slight effect on hyperbilirubinemia (P = .052). Blood transfusions and surgical times were not significant factors.

Conclusion

Donor safety is paramount, requiring thorough donor evaluation. Extensive liver resection may result in transient functional impairment. Several factors are believed to play roles in the development of postoperative hyperbilirubinemia after living-donor hepatectomy.     

Clinical significance of right hepatectomy along the main portal fissure on donors in living donor liver transplantation

There might be discordance between inter‐lobar borders of the main portal fissure (MPF) using the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and of the portal segmentation. Forty‐five living donors who underwent right hepatectomy for the adult recipients from 2007 to 2011 in a tertiary hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The donors were classified into conventional right hepatectomy along the MPF (cRL group, n = 26) and modified right hepatectomy along right‐side shifted transection plane from the MPF (mRL group, n = 19). The cRL donors had higher postoperative peak level of INR (1.84 vs. 1.62; P = 0.022), and bilirubin (3.37 mg/dl vs. 2.74 mg/dl; P = 0.065) than the mRL donors. cRL donors experienced greater depression of platelet count (144 per nL vs. 168 per nL; P = 0.042) and enlargement of splenic volume (52% vs. 37%; P = 0.025) than mRL donors for 7 days after hepatectomy. The regeneration of the left lateral sector was more accelerated in the cRL donors than the mRL donors for postoperative 3 months (148% vs. 84%; P = 0.015). There were no differences in the post‐transplant graft function, incidence of complications, and graft survival rates between the two groups of recipients (P > 0.05). This study suggests that the conventional right hepatectomy along the MHV might increase donor risk by reducing parenchymal liver volume of the segment IV.     

成人间活体肝移植体会：附3例报告

目的总结和分析成人间活体肝移植(LDLT)的临床经验。方法对2007年2月—2007年7月的3例成人间活体肝移植的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果供体为供体右半肝(不带肝中静脉)1例,供体扩大左半肝(带肝中静脉、尾状叶)2例,GV/SLV均≥40%。3对供者及患者术后均恢复良好,无小肝综合征发生,均未出现严重并发症。术后左半肝供者较右半肝供者肝功能恢复更快。结论如左半肝GV/SLV≥40%,可优先选择左半肝作为供肝;胆道重建不必放置胆管引流管;成人间LDLT是治疗终末期肝病的安全有效的手段。     

Simplified Unification Patch Venoplasty for Anomalous Portal Vein Branching in Living Donor Liver Transplantation With Right Lobe Graft

Double portal vein (PV) branches during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with right lobe grafts have been considered challenging both in terms of donor safety and the complexity of vascular reconstruction in the recipient. Herein, we describe our experience with 24 adult LDLT recipients during which we employed unification patch venoplasty to reconstruct right lobe grafts with double PV orifices. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 195 adult LDLT recipients receiving right lobe grafts, including 24 cases of adult LDLT recipients in which unification patch venoplasty was used to treat double PVs from January 2010 to June 2015. The anomalous portal vein branches of the donors were of type II in 7 cases (29.2%), type III in 15 cases (62.5%), and type IV in 2 cases (8.3%). We used propensity score matching analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of these recipients with those of 59 recipients who underwent adult LDLT using right lobe grafts with normal PVs in the same period. Intraoperative PV stenting was necessary in 2 (8.3%) of the 24 recipients undergoing unification patch venoplasty. During the follow-up period, all PVs remained patent until death or censoring. No significant difference in terms of postoperative vascular complications was evident between the 2 groups. Moreover, no major complications requiring reoperation or endoscopic and/or radiologic intervention developed in any of the 24 living donors with double PVs. In conclusion, our simplified unification patch venoplasty could be safe and feasible when used to reconstruct double PV orifices in right lobe LDLT from donors with complex PV anomalies.     

Graft size assessment and analysis of donors for living donor liver transplantation using right lobe

BACKGROUND: Modality of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been expanded to adult cases. However, the safety of right lobectomy from living donors has not yet been proven. METHODS: A total of 62 cases of LDLT, using the right lobe, were reviewed. Study 1: Discrepancy between estimated graft volume and actual graft weight was evaluated. Study 2: Postoperative liver functions were analyzed in relation to residual liver volume (RLV) or age. Residual liver volume of donors was defined using two indices, (RLV = estimated whole liver volume - estimated graft volume and %RLV = RLV/estimated whole liver volumex100). Donors were divided into two groups on the basis of either %RLV (<40%; 40%< or =) or age (<50 years old; 50 years old < or =). Study 3: Right lobe donors were compared with left lobe donors (35 cases) in terms of their postoperative liver functions. RESULTS: Study 1: The relationship between estimated graft volume and actual graft weight was linear (y=159.136+0.735x, R2=0.571, P<0.001). Study 2: %RLV ranged from 23.5% to 55.8% (mean +/- SD: 43.2+/-6.0). Fifteen cases showed %RLV less than 40%. Postoperative bilirubin clearance was delayed in that group (%RLV<40%). Serum total bilirubin values on postoperative day 7 in the older group (age > or =50) were significantly higher than those in the younger group (age<50). Study 3: Postoperative liver functions of right lobe donors were significantly higher than those of left-lobe donors. Eleven donors (17.7%) had surgical complications, all of which were cured with proper treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Right lobectomy from living donors is a safe procedure with acceptable morbidity, but some care should be taken early after the operation for donors with small residual liver and aged donors.     

Intraoperative ‘No Go’ Donor Hepatectomies in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Donor safety is the paramount concern of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Although LDLT is employed worldwide, there is little data on rates and causes of ‘no go’ hepatectomies—patients brought to the operating room for possible donor hepatectomy whose procedure was aborted. We performed a single‐center, retrospective review of all patients brought to the operating room for donor hepatectomy between October 2000 and November 2008. Of 257 right lobe donors, the donor operation was aborted in 12 cases (4.7%). The main reasons for stopping the operation were aberrant ductal or vascular anatomy (seven cases), unsuitable liver quality (three cases) or unexpected intraoperative events (two cases). Over the median period of follow‐up of 23 months, there were no long‐term complications of patients with aborted donor procedures. This report focuses exclusively on an important issue: the frequency and causes of no go decisions at a single large volume North American LDLT center. The rate of no go donor hepatectomies should be as low as possible without compromising donor safety—however, even with rigorous preoperative evaluation the rate of donor abortions will be significant. The default surgical position should always be to abort the donor operation if there is an unexpected finding that places the donor at increased risk.     

Safety of donor in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft

BACKGROUND: The growing gap between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and available organs has continued to be the primary issue facing the transplant community. To overcome the waiting list mortality, living donor liver transplantation has become an option, in which the greatest concern is the safety of the donor, especially in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT) using a right lobe liver graft. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of donors after right lobe liver donation for A-A LDLT performed in our center. METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2006, 26 patients underwent A-A LDLT using right lobe liver grafts in our center. Seven donors were men and 19 were women (range, 19-65 years; median age, 38 years). The right lobe liver grafts were obtained by transecting the liver on the right side of the middle hepatic vein without interrupting the vascular blood flow. The mean follow-up time for these donors was 9 months. RESULTS: These donor residual liver volumes ranged from 30.5% to 60.3%. We did not experience any donor mortality. Two cases (7.69%) experienced major complications: intra-abdominal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in one each and three (11.54%), minor ones: wound steatosis in two, and transient chyle leak in one. All donors were fully recovered and returned to their previous occupations. CONCLUSIONS: A-A LDLT using a right lobe liver graft has become a standard option. The donation of right lobe liver for A-A LDLT was a relatively safe procedure in our center.     

Donor graft does not affect the P450 2C19 genotype expressed in peripheral blood in recipients of living donor liver transplantation

Chiu K‐W, Tai W‐C, Nakano T, Tseng H‐P, Cheng Y‐F, Jawan B, Goto S, Chen C‐L. Donor graft does not affect the P450 2C19 genotype expressed in peripheral blood in recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 830–834. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The function of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is altered in patients with end‐stage liver disease (ESLD) that require liver transplantation (LT). The status of CYP2C19 is of considerable interest because the transplanted healthy donor livers are perfused with the blood of the recipient with ESLD. This study aims to clarify the changes in CYP2C19 in the peripheral blood before and after LT. Thirty pairs of living donors and recipients were enrolled in this study. The CYP2C19 genotype in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was studied immediately before operation in donors, on the day preceding the operation in the unstable recipients, and one month after LT in stable recipients. Limited data suggest that the post‐LT genotype in liver biopsy is the same as donor’s original genotype in most cases (80.0%) and that only 2 patients in the study cohort had the same liver tissue genotype as the respective recipient PBMCs. However, expression of the CYP2C19 genotype after living donor LT (LDLT) was identical to pre‐transplant expression in 100% (30/30) of recipients, i.e., CYP2C19 genotypes in recipient PBMCs did not change after LDLT, suggesting that the donor liver did not render any mutations to the CYP2C19 genotypes after LT.     

活体肝移植治疗HBV相关性急性亚急性肝功能衰竭

目的 探讨活体肝移植(living donor liver transplantation,LDLT)HBV感染导致的急性肝功能衰竭(acute liver failure,ALF)和亚急性肝功能衰竭(subacute liver failure,SALF)患者的可行性,并评价其疗效.方法 回顾性分析2000年11月至2007年10月完成的10例LDLT治疗ALF、SALF患者的临床资料.10例LDLT的供、受者均为成人,切取右半肝为移植物,8例含肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV).10例供者的评估均在确定实施LDLT的24 h内完成,供、受者手术均在确定供者后的12 h内完成.移植物质量与受者体质量比为(1.03±0.17)%(0.86%～1.22%),移植物体积与受者标准肝体积比为(52.2±11.8)%(47.6%～70.1%).结果 10例受者中,2例分别于术后7、28 d时因肺部感染、十二指肠球部溃疡穿孔腹腔感染死亡.1例胆管吻合口胆漏,经十二指肠镜下置入鼻胆管引流治愈.2例术后1周出现轻度急性排斥反应,增强免疫抑制强度后肝功能恢复正常.8例中位随访期9.6个月(2～84个月),生存质量优良.10例供者中,1例出现急性门静脉高压症导致脾脏破裂,行脾脏切除术,其后出现胆管断端胆漏,经鼻胆管引流结合经皮穿刺腹腔引流治愈.其余9例无并发症发生.结论 LDLT适宜治疗HBV感染导致的ALF、SALF,而且能获得较好的中、远期疗效.