Electroejaculation Versus Vibratory Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injured Men: Sperm Quality and Patient Preference

Purpose

We compared semen quality and patient preference between penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in spinal cord injured men.

Materials and Methods

We treated 11 spinal cord injured men with penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in random order. End points examined were semen analysis, sperm functional assessment, and patient pain scores (1 to 10) and preferred procedure. Differences between the procedures were determined with the paired Student t test.

Results

There was no difference in antegrade sperm count but penile vibratory stimulation specimens had greater motility (26.0 versus 10.7%), viability (25.2 versus 9.7%) and motile sperm count (185.0 x 10⁶ versus 97.0 x 10⁶). The retrograde sperm count was greater (but not significant) in electroejaculation patients. The total (antegrade plus retrograde) and motile sperm counts were not different. There was no difference in immunobead test (all negative), cervical mucus penetration or sperm penetration assay, although the percent hamster egg penetration approached significance (53.7% for penile vibratory stimulation versus 22.1% for electroejaculation, p = 0.06). There was no difference in the peak blood pressures and no complications were noted. Pain scores were significantly greater for electroejaculation compared to penile vibratory stimulation (5.2 versus 1.7, respectively). All patients preferred penile vibratory stimulation.

Conclusions

There was a slight advantage in sperm quality and a high patient preference in favor of penile vibratory stimulation. Penile vibratory stimulation should be attempted first to induce ejaculation in spinal cord injured men, with electroejaculation reserved for failures.     

Semen Quality of Spinal Cord Injured Men is Better When Obtained by Vibratory Stimulation Versus Electroejaculation

Purpose

Most spinal cord injured men require assisted ejaculation procedures to obtain semen, and the majority can achieve this result by vibratory stimulation or electroejaculation. We determined if semen obtained by vibratory stimulation differed in quality from that obtained by electroejaculation.

Materials and Methods

Between subjects and within subjects designs were used. Of 77 spinal cord injured men 23 underwent vibratory stimulation only, 44 electroejaculation only and 10 both procedures. Antegrade, retrograde and total ejaculates were analyzed in each subject for total sperm count, percent motile sperm and percent sperm with rapid linear motion.

Results

With vibratory stimulation compared to electroejaculation the percent motile sperm and percent sperm with rapid linear motion were significantly greater, whereas total sperm count was similar, in the antegrade specimens and total ejaculates. This finding was true for different groups of subjects as well as within a group of the same subjects.

Conclusions

Semen obtained by vibratory stimulation is of better quality than that obtained by electroejaculation. In medical practices that include assisted ejaculation of spinal cord injured men, we recommend obtaining a specimen by vibratory stimulation. If that method fails electroejaculation should be performed.     

Canine model of infertility after spinal cord injury: time course of acute changes in semen quality and spermatogenesis

PURPOSE: We established a canine model of subfertility after spinal cord injury and examined the time course of acute changes in semen quality and spermatogenesis after spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven dogs underwent surgical T7 spinal cord injury. Six dogs were used as controls. Electroejaculation and testicular fine needle aspiration were performed at baseline and twice weekly for 3 weeks after spinal cord injury. Semen quality change was examined by standard semen analysis. Spermatogenesis was assessed by flow cytometry of testicular fine needle aspiration in all dogs as well as by testicular histology at study conclusion in 4 controls and 4 spinal cord injured dogs. RESULTS: No significant changes in spinal cord injured dogs were noted before 3 weeks after injury. From baseline to 3 weeks after injury certain changes were evident in spinal cord injured dogs. Mean antegrade sperm motility decreased from 62.9% to 20.1% (p = 0.008), mean total sperm (antegrade plus retrograde total sperm) decreased from 423 to 294 x 106 which was not statistically significant, and the incidence of testicular haploid cells decreased from 75.6% to 48.3% (p = 0.028). No significant change in any parameter was present in control dogs. The mean number of mature spermatids per cross-sectional tubule on final testicular histology was significantly decreased in spinal cord injured dogs compared with controls (13.6 versus 43.9, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In the canine model tested the dogs readily survived spinal cord injury, electroejaculation was effective for obtaining ejaculate and fine needle aspiration allowed serial examination of spermatogenesis. Three weeks after spinal cord injury but not before 3 weeks sperm motility and spermatogenesis were significantly decreased. However, at the same point this decrease in spermatogenesis was not yet reflected in the total ejaculated sperm count.     

Seminal vesicle aspiration in spinal cord injured men: insight into poor sperm quality

PURPOSE: In men with spinal cord injury poor quality semen is seen when performing electroejaculation and penile vibratory stimulation. We determined whether sperm stasis within the seminal vesicles is a potential cause of this problem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seminal vesicle aspiration was performed immediately before electroejaculation or penile vibratory stimulation in men with aspermia secondary to spinal cord injury. Sperm count and quality of seminal vesicle aspiration and subsequent ejaculation were compared with historical ejaculated counts, ultrasound findings and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Mean total number of right plus left seminal vesicle sperm plus or minus standard deviation was 511 +/- 960 x 10(6). Mean total number of sperm obtained by seminal vesicle plus electroejaculation or penile vibratory stimulation was 918 +/- 1,261 x 10(6). Average motility and viability of the seminal vesicle aspirated sperm were 1.3 and 3.2%, respectively. Average motility of the ejaculated sperm was 26.4% after seminal vesicle aspiration versus 16.3% in previous ejaculation induction procedures performed in the same patients. Seminal vesicle aspirated sperm represented 66% of the total number of sperm obtained during the session and was equal to 49% of the sperm obtained at previous electroejaculation or penile vibratory stimulation sessions. The period of abstinence correlated only with ejaculate count (simple regression p = 0.009). No other clinical characteristics had any effect on sperm count or quality. CONCLUSIONS: Large numbers of poor quality sperm are present within the seminal vesicles of spinal cord injured men and these sperm comprise a large portion of the specimens collected by electroejaculation or penile vibratory stimulation. This phenomenon is independent of the period of abstinence, implicating disordered storage of sperm due to spinal cord injury rather than infrequent ejaculation. The large number of senescent sperm within the seminal vesicles appears to be a primary cause of poor sperm quality in spinal cord injured men.     

Electroejaculation with a foley catheter in the bladder

Electroejaculation has been successfully used for sperm procurement in anejaculatory men desiring fertility. The electroejaculation procedure begins with complete catheterization of the bladder and instillation of an insemination medium into the bladder as a buffer. This step can minimize possible detrimental effects of urine on any retrograde ejaculate. The catheter is then removed. After the collection of the antegrade ejaculate, the bladder is catheterized again. Our objective was to evaluate the possibility of performing electroejaculation while the Foley catheter is instilled in the bladder. Eleven men with anejaculation underwent 22 procedures of rectal probe electroejaculation. Each patient underwent electroejaculation twice, once without the catheter instilled in the bladder (standard method) and once with it. The 2 methods, with and without the catheter, showed no significant differences in volume, concentration, motility, count, and total motility of the antegrade ejaculate. In retrograde ejaculate, there were no significant differences in the count, motility, and total motility. In addition, there was no difference in the total count and the total motility of both fractions in the 2 methods. In this study, we show that ejaculation can be achieved while the Foley catheter is instilled in the urethra without any detrimental effect on the sperm. Therefore, we recommend not removing the Foley catheter while performing electroejaculation.     

PREDICTORS OF NECROSPERMIA IN MEN WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY

Purpose

We identify predictors of the lowest yield of dead sperm in ejaculates of men with spinal cord injury.

Materials and Methods

The percentages of dead immotile sperm and dead total sperm were compared in 141 spinal cord injured and 52 normal men. Predictors of necrospermia investigated in spinal cord injured men included specimen collection by vibratory stimulation versus electroejaculation, residence of sperm in antegrade versus retrograde specimens and level of injury.

Results

Spinal cord injured subjects had a significantly higher percentage of dead sperm in the immotile fraction and total specimen than control subjects. The percentage of dead sperm was lower in antegrade versus retrograde specimens and in specimens produced by vibratory stimulation versus electroejaculation. There was no difference in the percentage of dead sperm by level of injury.

Conclusions

Of the parameters evaluated only method and type of specimen collection were predictive of the degree of necrospermia in men with spinal cord injury. Level of injury was not predictive. The ratio of dead-to-live immotile sperm in spinal cord injured men was double that in normal men, indicating a pathological mechanism for sperm cell death.     

Transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts for treating ejaculatory symptoms

OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts (TURED) in infertile men with symptomatic ejaculatory duct obstruction (EDO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Before surgery, all patients complained of a decrease in the volume of their ejaculate, 14 of 15 had a non-projectile ejaculation, nine had a genitourinary infection necessitating antibiotic treatment, and five had pain with orgasm. The mean ejaculate volume and total motile sperm count was 1.1 mL and 8.1 million sperm per ejaculate. After surgery, at a mean follow-up of 2 months, 10 men reported having projectile ejaculation, and eight reported a marked improvement in their sensation of orgasm. Overall, 14 men reported a subjective improvement in their ejaculation. The average postoperative ejaculate volume was 2.3 mL and the total motile sperm count was 38.1 million per ejaculate. CONCLUSIONS: Men with symptomatic EDO who underwent TURED showed improvements in their ejaculation, sensation of orgasm, semen analysis values and fertility.     

Intrauterine insemination with double ejaculate compared with single ejaculate in male factor infertility: a pilot study

The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of using a double ejaculate with the efficiency of using a single ejaculate for intrauterine insemination in male subfertility. Eligibility for the study was a total motile sperm count between 1 x 10(6) and 5 x 10(6) on postwash sperm analysis. Thirty-nine couples were randomized to the study group, while another 50 couples were randomized to serve as the control group. Males in the study group were asked to produce a second semen sample within 2 hours of the first sample on the day of insemination. In the study group, the mean total motile sperm count in the first sample was 3.83 x 10(6) (SD +/- 0.85 x 10(6); range 1.1-4.9) and 3.99 x 10(6) (SD +/- 0.72 x 10(6); range 0.9-4.4) in the control group. The mean total motile sperm count in the second sample was 3.52 x 10(6) (SD +/- 1.46 x 10(6); range 0.9-3.7) in the study group. The mean total motile sperm count in the final inseminate was 7.35 x 10(6) (SD +/- 1.90 x 10(6); range 2.9-10.6) in the study group. The difference in total motile sperm counts between the study and the control group was statistically significant (P < .001). There were 6 pregnancies in the study group, providing a pregnancy rate of 15.3%, whereas there were 5 pregnancies in the control group, representing a pregnancy rate of 10% (P = .44). We concluded that although it does not increase the pregnancy rate significantly, obtaining a second semen sample when the motile sperm yield of the first semen sample is 1 million to 5 million significantly increases the total motile sperm count in the final inseminate.     

Application of 2 vibrators salvages ejaculatory failures to 1 vibrator during penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injuries

PURPOSE: Penile vibratory stimulation is the treatment of first choice for anejaculation in men with spinal cord injury. Nonresponders to penile vibratory stimulation are usually referred for electroejaculation or surgical sperm retrieval. Compared to penile vibratory stimulation these methods are invasive and usually yield lower total motile sperm, potentially limiting options for assisted reproductive technologies. To avoid these less than ideal options a simple method to salvage penile vibratory stimulation failures would be of benefit to spinal cord injured patients. We investigated the recovery rate when 2 vibrators were used to salvage ejaculatory failures to 1 vibrator in men with spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in 297 spinal cord injured men who underwent a total of 965 trials of penile vibratory stimulation at our center between 1991 and 2006. Only trials with high amplitude vibrators were examined. All men underwent 2 or more penile vibratory stimulation trials using 1 vibrator applied to the dorsum or frenulum of the glans penis. Men failing to ejaculate with 1 vibrator received 1 or more trials in which the glans penis was then sandwiched between 2 vibrators. RESULTS: Of all men 49% and 57% of those whose level of injury was T10 or above responded to penile vibratory stimulation with 1 vibrator. Of failures with 1 vibrator 22% responded to penile vibratory stimulation with 2 vibrators. CONCLUSIONS: Application of 2 vibrators salvaged ejaculatory failures to 1 vibrator during penile vibratory stimulation procedures in men with spinal cord injury. This simple penile vibratory stimulation sandwich method is recommended before referring patients for electroejaculation or surgical sperm retrieval.     

上海地区正常生育力男性精液参考值初探

目的:回顾分析上海地区志愿捐精者与正常生育力男性精液分析各项主要参数的分布特征,比较两组男性精液质量的差别,探讨上海地区男性精液参数的正常参考值下限。方法:2010年10月至2011年7月上海市人类精子库招募正常生育力男性41例,健康捐精者100例,按《世界卫生组织人类精液检查与处理实验室手册》(第5版)进行精液常规检测,评估精液体积、精子浓度、前向运动(PR)精子百分率、精子总数和PR精子总数的均值,标准差,并进行t检验。同时统计正常生育力组上述各参数的分布,得出精液特征参数的正常参考值下限。结果:健康捐精组与正常生育力组精液常规各项主要参数(精液体积、精子浓度、PR精子百分率、精子总数、PR精子总数)间差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。上海地区正常生育力男性精液参考值下限(P<0.05)为:浓度≥27.3×106/ml、PR≥8.1%、体积≥0.82 ml、精子总数≥44.73×106/1次射精、PR精子总数≥24.68×106/1次射精。结论:在评估男性生育力时,精子总数和PR精子总数可能是比精子浓度、精液体积和PR精子百分数更具参考价值的评价指标。     

Abdominal electrical stimulation rescues failures to penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury: a report of two cases

Most men with spinal cord injury are anejaculatory. To retrieve their semen for insemination, the procedure of penile vibratory stimulation is recommended over electroejaculation. Some men with spinal cord injury, however, cannot ejaculate with penile vibratory stimulation. We present 2 cases in which a simple, over-the-counter abdominal muscle stimulator rescued failures to penile vibratory stimulation. Use of this safe, easy, and inexpensive method may prevent some patients from undergoing more expensive, more invasive sperm retrieval methods such as electroejaculation or surgical sperm retrieval from the testis or epididymis.     

Anejaculation following spinal cord injury does not induce sperm-agglutinating antibodies

Antisperm antibodies were tested for by the MAR-test and the tray agglutination test in 16 men with spinal cord injury. None of these men could ejaculate without artificial methods. Seven men ejaculated externally by vibrator stimulation or electroejaculation, while seven exhibited retrograde ejaculation; in two cases no semen was obtained. Sperm density in the external ejaculations was high (average = 405 x 10(6)/ml), with 10-45% motility. None of these 16 men had antisperm antibodies. This result indicates that anejaculation and sperm retention in men with spinal cord injury, even of 30 years duration, does not result in antisperm antibody formation.     

Does repeated electro-ejaculation improve sperm quality in spinal cord injured men?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of repeated electro-ejaculation on the sperm quality in spinal cord injured men. SETTING: Regional Spinal Injuries Unit, Southport, UK and Hewitt Center for Reproductive Medicine, Liverpool, UK. METHOD: Retrospective, observational study of men with spinal cord injuries undergoing repeated electro-ejaculation as a part of fertility treatment. RESULT: There was no improvement in the volume, sperm concentration, motility or the total motile count in the successive antegrade and retrograde samples following repeated electro-ejaculations. CONCLUSION: Electro-ejaculation is an invasive procedure and its use should be restricted to obtaining semen sample for carrying out assisted conception procedures only.     

Sperm cryopreservation and assisted reproductive technology outcome in patients with spinal cord injury

This study aimed to describe spinal cord injured patients’ semen characteristics before and after cryopreservation, and assisted reproductive technology cycles outcome compared to the infertile population. Data about sperm analysis and assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles outcomes for 78 men with spinal cord injury referred for sperm cryopreservation between 1998 and 2013 were retrospectively analysed and compared with a reference group consisting of every Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycle performed in our in vitro fertilization unit over the 2009–2014 period. Semen was collected by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS), electroejaculation or via testis biopsies. Fresh and frozen semen parameters and ART outcomes with frozen‐thawed sperm were measured. Patients were divided into three groups according to the sperm retrieval methods: 37 electroejaculations, 37 PVSs and four surgical sperm retrievals. Low ejaculate volume was observed in 33% of the patients, and oligozoospermia in 37% of the patients. Specimens from 77 of the patients contained motile sperm and were therefore frozen for future use. There was no statistical difference for any of the fresh semen parameters between all groups. Twenty of them underwent ICSI leading to five live births, while four underwent intrauterine insemination. ART with frozen‐thawed spermatozoa can provide men with SCI with comparable results as in the infertile population.     

Male sexual dysfunction and infertility associated with neurological disorders

Normal sexual and reproductive functions depend largely on neurological mechanisms. Neurological defects in men can cause infertility through erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory dysfunction and semen abnormalities. Among the major conditions contributing to these symptoms are pelvic and retroperitoneal surgery, diabetes, congenital spinal abnormalities, multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury. Erectile dysfunction can be managed by an increasingly invasive range of treatments including medications, injection therapy and the surgical insertion of a penile implant. Retrograde ejaculation is managed by medications to reverse the condition in mild cases and in bladder harvest of semen after ejaculation in more severe cases. Anejaculation might also be managed by medication in mild cases while assisted ejaculatory techniques including penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation are used in more severe cases. If these measures fail, surgical sperm retrieval can be attempted. Ejaculation with penile vibratory stimulation can be done by some spinal cord injured men and their partners at home, followed by in-home insemination if circumstances and sperm quality are adequate. The other options always require assisted reproductive techniques including intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The method of choice depends largely on the number of motile sperm in the ejaculate.     

Fertility of Spinal Cord Injured Males: Effect of Genitourinary Infection and Bladder Management on Results of Electroejaculation

ABSTRACT

Thirty-eight men undergoing electroejaculation (EEJ) procedures for anejaculatory infertility were examined for the presence or absence of infection in urine and semen. In 29 spinal cord injury patients, a high incidence of infected urine and infected semen (41% and 56%, respectively) was seen, in contrast to patients with normal bladder function (0% and 11 %).

Urinary infection was associated with slightly lower sperm quality and lower pregnancy rates (10% vs 30% in the presence of sterile urine). Semen infection had no effect on sperm counts or pregnancy rates. If intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) was used to empty the neurogenic bladder, slightly better sperm quality was seen, the total failure rate was less, and much better pregnancy rates (44%) resulted than for patients using an alternative bladder management (7%).

Antibiotics did not reduce the incidence of urine or semen infection, but did improve sperm counts slightly. Continuous prophylaxis was associated with bacterial resistance to many oral antibiotics and had no advantage over a short course of antibiotics prior to the procedure.

Despite the above associations, the sperm quality in our patient population was never normal compared with that of men who ejaculate normally. We conclude that the low sperm quality seen in electroejaculation specimens from spinal cord injured males is not due entirely to infection or to the type of bladder management. Short courses of antibiotics, instead of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis, may be beneficial. Intermittent catheterization is superior to other methods of neurogenic bladder management in maintaining the fertility of spinal cord injured men.     

Testis biopsy findings in the spinal cord injured patient

PURPOSE: Azoospermia after electroejaculation in spinal cord injured men may be due to testicular failure or obstruction. These men can initiate pregnancy with assisted reproductive techniques, such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but only if sperm are present in the testis biopsy. We analyzed the histopathology of testis biopsies from spinal cord injured men and assessed whether patient factors were predictive of testis biopsy pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 paraplegic men undergoing testis biopsy were divided into 2 groups based on normal or abnormal testis histopathology. Patient age, post-injury years, level of lesion, hormonal status and semen analysis results were compared. RESULTS: Spermatogenesis was normal in 28 of the 50 patients. Hypospermatogenesis was exhibited in 15, maturation arrest at the spermatid stage in 6 and maturation arrest at the spermatocyte stage in 1 of the 22 abnormal cases. Nevertheless, mature sperm were identified in 43 of 50 biopsies (normal spermatogenesis and hypospermatogenesis). Men with normal spermatogenesis had better forward progression of sperm and a higher testosterone-to-luteinizing hormone ratio. Otherwise, there was no statistically significant correlation between study variables and testis biopsy results. No factors were predictive of testis biopsy histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: The documentation of mature sperm in 43 of 50 biopsies from spinal cord injured patients suggests that a high rate of sperm retrieval is possible using testicular sperm extraction if sperm cannot be retrieved from the ejaculate. With intracytoplasmic sperm injection techniques the majority of spinal cord injured men retain fertility potential, even if azoospermic following electroejaculation.     

Semen features of 596 truly infertile men

Semen examinations were performed on 596 truly infertile men. The results obtained were compared with those of supposedly infertile men. Our findings indicate that the mean sperm count, mean total sperm per ejaculate, mean percentage motility and morphology of truly infertile males were far lower than past reports suggest. The type of male population studied was identified as the possible source of discrepancy. The data obtained further suggest that the realistic cutoff point between fertile and infertile semen should be a sperm concentration of 10 million/ml, a total sperm per ejaculate of 25 million, percentage motile and well-formed sperms of 40 and 60, respectively.     

Penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in the treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction

The purpose of this review is to present the current understanding of penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) and electroejaculation (EEJ) procedures and its clinical use in men with ejaculatory dysfunction. Unfortunately, the record of treating such individuals has been quite poor, but within recent years development and refinement of PVS and EEJ in men with spinal cord injury (SCI) has significantly enhanced the prospects for treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction. The majority of spinal cord injured men are not able to produce antegrade ejaculation by masturbation or sexual stimulation. However, approximately 80% of all spinal cord injured men with an intact ejaculatory reflex arc (above T10) can obtain antegrade ejaculation with PVS. Electroejaculation may be successful in obtaining ejaculate from men with all types of SCI, including men who do not have major components of the ejaculatory reflex arc. Because vibratory stimulation is very simple in use, non-invasive, it does not require anaesthesia and is preferred by the patients when compared with EEJ, PVS is recommended to be the first choice of treatment in spinal cord injured men. Furthermore, EEJ has been successfully used to induce ejaculation in men with multiple sclerosis and diabetic neuropathy. Any other conditions which affect the ejaculatory mechanism of the central and/or peripheral nervous system including surgical nerve injury may be treated successfully with EEJ. Finally, for sperm retrieval and sperm cryopreservation before intensive anticancer therapy in pubertal boys, PVS and EEJ have been successfully performed in patients who failed to obtain ejaculation by masturbation. Nearly all data concerning semen characteristics in men with ejaculatory dysfuntion originate from spinal cord injured men. Semen analyses demonstrate low sperm motility rates in the majority of spinal cord injured men. The data give evidence of a decline in spermatogenesis and motility of ejaculated spermatozoa shortly after (few weeks) an acute SCI. Furthermore, it is suggested that some factors in the seminal plasma and/or disordered storage of spermatozoa in the seminal vesicles are mainly responsible for the impaired semen profiles in men with chronic SCI. Home insemination with semen obtained by penile vibratory and introduced intravaginally in order to achieve successful pregnancies may be an option for some spinal cord injured men and their partners. The majority of men will further enhance their fertility potential when using either penile vibratory or EEJ combined with assisted reproduction techniques such as intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection.     

Kruger strict morphology and post-thaw progressive motility in cryopreserved human spermatozoa

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate Kruger strict morphology and conventional semen analysis in predicting cryosurvival and the progressive motility recovery rate of frozen spermatozoa. Our study included 56 semen samples with >10 million spermatozoa per ejaculate. The main outcome measures were conventional semen analysis, strict morphology analysis by the Kruger method, cryosurvival rate and post-thaw sperm motility. A significant reduction in sperm motility after cryopreservation was demonstrated. The freeze-thawing process caused a 66% reduction in rapid progressive motile spermatozoa, a 45% reduction in slow progressive motile spermatozoa and a 2% reduction in nonprogressive motile spermatozoa. The cryosurvival and progressive motility recovery rates were not correlated with parameters of conventional semen analysis, such as sperm concentration, motility, WHO morphology and total motile count, but the progressive motility recovery rate was significantly correlated with the percentage of spermatozoa exhibiting Kruger normal morphology (P = 0.028). The recovery rate of rapidly progressive motility was profoundly decreased compared with slow progressive motility following the frozen-thaw procedure of semen. Kruger strict morphology assessment was a better predictor of the progressive motility recovery rate following the freezing-thaw procedure than parameters of conventional semen analysis.