Multicenter international registry of unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluting stents in patients with myocardial infarction

Background: Patients who present with myocardial infarction (MI) and unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease represent an extremely high‐risk subset of patients. ULMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug‐eluting stents (DES) in MI patients has not been extensively studied. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter international registry, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of 62 consecutive patients with MI who underwent ULMCA PCI with DES (23 ST‐elevation MI [STEMI] and 39 non‐ST‐elevation MI [NSTEMI]) from 2002 to 2006. Results: The mean age was 70 ± 12 years. Cardiogenic shock was present in 24%. The mean EuroSCORE was 10 ± 8. Angiographic success was achieved in all patients. Overall in‐hospital major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 10%, mortality was 8%, all due to cardiac deaths from cardiogenic shock, and one patient suffered a periprocedural MI. At 586 ± 431 days, 18 patients (29%) experienced MACE, 12 patients (19%) died (the mortality rate was 47% in patients with cardiogenic shock), and target vessel revascularization was performed in four patients, all of whom had distal bifurcation involvement (two patients underwent repeat PCI and two patients underwent bypass surgery). There was no additional MI. Two patients had probable stent thrombosis and one had possible stent thrombosis. Diabetes [hazard ratio (HR) 4.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.07–17.36), P = 0.04), left ventricular ejection fraction [HR 0.94, 95% CI (0.90–0.98), P = 0.005), and intubation [HR 7.00, 95% CI (1.62–30.21), P = 0.009) were significantly associated with increased mortality. Conclusions: Patients with MI and ULMCA disease represent a very high‐risk subgroup of patients who are critically ill. PCI with DES appears to be technically feasible, associated with acceptable long‐term outcomes, and a reasonable alternative to surgical revascularization for MI patients with ULMCA disease. Randomized trials are needed to determine the ideal revascularization strategy for these patients. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Usefulness of noncoronary vascular disease in predicting adverse events in the year following percutaneous coronary intervention

It is unknown whether noncoronary vascular disease is associated with persistent cardiac risk in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry, the incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization outcomes were compared in patients who had noncoronary vascular disease (n = 554) with patients who did not (n = 4,075). Vascular disease was defined as a history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, claudication, vascular bypass, limb amputation, or aortic aneurysm. Patients who had concomitant noncoronary vascular disease had more significant co-morbidities. Angiographic success rate was lower in patients who had concomitant noncoronary vascular disease (89.5% vs 93.2%, p <0.01), whereas in-hospital adverse events, including death (2.7% vs 1.3%, p <0.05), MI (4.7% vs 2.6%, p <0.01), stroke (1.1% vs 0.2%, p <0.001), major entry site complication (6.7% vs 3.5%, p <0.001), and need for coronary artery bypass grafting (2.2% vs 1.1%, p <0.05) were significantly higher. One-year death rate (10.5% vs 4.5%, p <0.001) and MI rate (9.2% vs 5.2%, p <0.001) were also significantly higher in patients who had vascular disease. After adjustment, vascular disease was independently associated with a higher risk of death or MI (risk ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.8) and death, MI, or coronary artery bypass grafting (risk ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.6) at 1 year. Repeat PCI rates were similar (15.9% vs 13.8%, p = NS). In conclusion, the presence of noncoronary vascular disease is an independent predictor of MI and death or MI 1 year after PCI. Because PCI is often performed before vascular surgery, these data may lend insight to the risk/benefit ratio of such an approach.     

Effect of completeness of revascularization on clinical outcome in patients with multivessel disease presenting with unstable angina who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention

We evaluated the current short- and medium-term outcomes of complete revascularization, compared to culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in patients with multivessel coronary disease presenting with unstable angina. One hundred fifty-one patients with multivessel coronary disease presented to a tertiary cardiothoracic center with unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) between January 2000 and September 2001. In group A (n=71), the intended strategy was complete revascularization by multivessel PCI. In group B (n=80), culprit lesion PCI was intended despite the presence of other lesions amenable to PCI (B1) or due to confounding anatomical factors (B2). Clinical variables and endpoints were collected from patient notes, a dedicated database and telephone follow-up, and included recurrent stable and unstable angina, need for repeat PCI or elective coronary artery bypass graft, incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and death. Baseline characteristics were similar in each group. Procedural success was achieved in over 95% of cases in both groups with high stent implantation rates (>96%). There was no observed difference in mortality or incidence of MI between the groups. Compared to group A, more patients in group B1 had residual angina [22.8% (13/57) versus 9.9% (7/71); p=0.041] and required further PCI [17.5% (10/57) versus 7.0% (5/71); p=0.045]. There was a non-significant trend toward fewer readmissions for UA and less long-term antianginal medication in group A [38.0% (27/71) versus 52.6% (30/57); p=0.043]. Complete and culprit lesion revascularization by PCI are safe methods of treating patients with multivessel coronary disease presenting with UA/NSTEMI. Reductions in residual angina, repeat PCI and need for antianginal therapies suggest that complete revascularization should be the strategy of choice when possible.     

Comparative early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (from the CADILLAC trial)

We determined the outcomes of patients with acute ST-segment elevation (STE) myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The prognosis after primary PCI in STEMI has been extensively studied and defined. Outcomes of patients who undergo primary PCI for NSTEMI are less well established. In total, 2,082 patients with ongoing chest pain for > 30 minutes consistent with acute MI were randomized to balloon angioplasty versus stenting, each with/without abciximab. Of 1,964 patients, STEMI was present in 1,725 (87.8%) and NSTEMI in 239 (12.2%). Compared with STEMI, those with NSTEMI were more likely to have delayed time-to-hospital arrival (2.4 vs 1.8 hours, p = 0.0002) and increased door-to-balloon time (3.2 vs 1.9 hours, p < 0.0001). Patients with NSTEMI were more likely to have Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow at baseline (37.3% vs 19.4%, p < 0.0001) and higher ejection fraction (58.7% vs 55.8%, p = 0.001), but similar rates of postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow. At 1 year, patients with NTEMI had similar mortality (3.4% vs 4.4%, p = 0.40) but higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (24.0% vs 16.6%, p = 0.007) that was driven by more frequent ischemic target vessel revascularization (21.8% vs 11.9%, p <0.0001). In conclusion, patients with acute MI without STE who are treated with primary PCI have marked delays to treatment, similar late mortality, and increased rates of ischemic target vessel revascularization compared with patients with STEMI, despite more favorable angiographic features at presentation and similar reperfusion success. The adverse prognosis of patients with NSTEMI should be recognized and efforts made to decrease reperfusion times.     

老年多支血管病变患者置入药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术后近远期临床结果

目的:本研究旨在比较老年(年龄≥75岁)稳定性冠心病合并多支血管病变患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)置入药物洗脱支架(DES)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的近远期临床结果。方法:本研究于2003年7月至2006年12月,连续入选年龄≥75岁稳定性冠心病合并多支血管病变患者363例,在我院行PCI置入DES(n=269)或CABG(n=94)治疗。主要终点为24个月时主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE),次要终点为24个月时全因死亡及非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、脑血管事件和再次血运重建以及全因死亡、非致死性MI和脑血管事件复合终点事件。结果:住院期间,CABG组的病死率(7.4%vs.1.9%,P=0.023)和非致死性MI的发生率(3.2%vs.0,P=0.023),明显高于DES组,CABG组的MACCE的发生率也明显高于DES组(10.6%vs.1.9%,P=0.001)。多因素回归分析结果显示:24个月时,CABG组和DES组的主要终点事件的风险未见明显差异[22.3%vs.15.2%,风险比(HR)=1.62,95%CI 0.63～3.31,P=0.379],两组的全因死亡、心源性死亡、非致死性MI、脑血管事件和再次血运重建的风险也没有明显差异;CABG组全因死亡、非致死性MI和脑血管事件复合终点事件的风险明显高于DES组(19.1%vs.8.2%,HR 3.87,95%CI:1.24～12.37,P=0.009)。结论:本研究提示,与DES相比,CABG可能会增加75岁以上多支血管病变患者的远期全因死亡、非致死性MI和脑血管事件复合终点事件的风险,而未降低再次血运重建和MACCE。     

Effect of prior revascularization on outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention; NHLBI Dynamic Registry.

AIMS: An increasing number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have experienced previous revascularization procedures. Their outcome after PCI has seldom been compared to that of patients without prior procedures. This study investigates which elements of prior revascularization affect in-hospital and long-term outcome after PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline characteristics as well as in-hospital and 1-year outcomes were compared in 4010 consecutive patients undergoing PCI in the NHLBI Dynamic Registry, categorized by type of prior procedure. In-hospital mortality was lowest and procedural success highest among patients with prior PCI only. Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) had higher rates for the combined endpoint of death and myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year compared to patients with no prior procedures. However, in multivariate regression analysis adjusting for potential confounders, neither prior PCI nor prior CABG were independent predictors of death or death/MI at 1 year. Patients with prior procedure had higher rates for repeat PCI and patients with prior PCI had higher rates for CABG during the year following the index procedures. These associations persisted after adjustment for potential confounders. Finally, patients with prior procedures had a higher prevalence of angina at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Due to adverse baseline characteristics, patients with prior CABG have higher rates for death/MI during the first year after PCI and both groups of patients with prior procedures have higher revascularization rates. However, only the associations with repeat revascularization persist after adjustment for baseline and procedural factors.     

非ST段抬高急性心肌梗死患者的临床特点及不良事件发生率分析

目的探讨非ST段抬高急性心肌梗死的临床特点及住院不良事件发生率。方法回顾性分析我院急性心肌梗死患者105例,分为ST段抬高组（n=68）和非ST段抬高组（n=37）,分析比较两组患者的冠状动脉造影特点及住院不良事件发生率。结果冠状动脉造影示病变血管数差异无显著性意义（P〉0．05）;非ST段抬高组以老年人多见（71％）,其中〉60岁的女性患者占41％,相关血管不完全闭塞比例较高、累及非主支血管较多,且梗死相关血管周围多有侧支循环形成。非ST段抬高组总住院不良事件（包括心力衰竭、再次心肌梗死、再次冠脉介入治疗和脑卒中等）的发生率明显较低,差异有显著性意义（P〈0．01）,但住院病死率和消化道出血发生率差异无显著性意义（P〉0．05）。结论非ST段抬高者以老年、女性患者居多,临床表现和冠状动脉造影的结果不典型,但有较好的近期预后。     

Renal insufficiency is an independent predictor of mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention

The present study was designed to evaluate whether the presence of renal disease during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with worse outcomes at 1 year in a multicenter study. The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, repeat PCI, and repeat revascularization were prospectively collected on 4,602 patients (6,542 lesions) in 2 waves of patients who underwent PCI in 17 centers between July 1997 and June 1999. Renal disease was defined as the presence of an increased creatinine level in a patient with a history or presence of renal failure treated with low protein diet or dialysis. Patients with renal disease (n = 192) were older and more likely to have diabetes, heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, known coronary disease, and multivessel disease than patients without renal disease (n = 4,410). Rates of stenting were equivalent (68.2% vs 73.0%, p = NS). Patients with renal disease had lower angiographic success (84.9% vs 92.8%, p <0.001) and higher mortality, both in-hospital (5.7% vs 1.2%, p <0.001) and at 1 year (19.7% vs 4.4%, p <0.0001). After adjusting for clinical, demographic, and angiographic differences, renal disease remained an independent predictor of in-hospital (odds ratio 3.81, 95% confidence interval 1.70 to 8.58) and 1-year (risk ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval 1.64 to 3.68) mortality. Renal disease conferred additional mortality risk in established high-risk clinical subgroups. In conclusion, after adjusting for a higher frequency of co-morbidities, renal disease remains a strong and independent predictor of increased in-hospital and 1-year mortality after PCI and is additive to other clinical markers of worse outcome.     

Initial culprit-only versus initial multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study registry

We investigated clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) treated for initial culprit-only or by initial simultaneous treatment of nonculprit lesion with culprit lesion. Optimal management of multivessel disease in STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still unclear in the drug-eluting stent era. We compared clinical outcomes of 274 STEMI patients (69.3 ± 11.8 years, 77 % men) in the Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study registry who underwent initial culprit-only (OCL, n = 220) or initial multivessel PCI of nonculprit lesion with culprit lesion (NCL, n = 54) from April 2007 to August 2010. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) included all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-vessel revascularization (TVR), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Patients in the NCL group were older and had higher Killip class and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate than those in the OCL group. MI, TVR, CVA, and stent thrombosis were not significantly different between the two groups. Incidences of all-cause death and MACCE were lower in the OCL than in the NCL group (all-cause death: 10.9 % vs 31.5 %, P < 0.05; MACCE: 27.7 % vs 46.2 %, P < 0.05). After adjusting for patient characteristics, NCL remained at significantly higher risk compared with OCL for in-hospital and all-cause death (P = 0.001, respectively), and MACCE were not significantly different (odds ratio 1.95, 95 % confidence interval 0.94–4.08; P = 0.07) between groups. Initial multivessel PCI was associated with significantly increased risk of in-hospital death, all-cause death, and MACCE, which was somewhat attenuated in a multivariable model, but the numerically excessive risk with NCL still persisted.     

Temporal trends, safety, and efficacy of bivalirudin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin based therapy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease in a large multicenter registry. BACKGROUND: The REPLACE I trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of a strategy of bivalirudin compared with heparin and glycoprotein (GP) IIbIIIa inhibition in patients undergoing PCI. There is a paucity of outcome data with bivalirudin use in the setting of real-world PCI practice. METHODS: We evaluated the outcome of 11,719 patients who underwent elective PCI for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) from 2002 to 2004 in a large regional consortium, and who were treated with bivalirudin (n = 2051) or with heparin and GP IIbIIIa inhibitors (n = 9,668). The primary endpoints were transfusion and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of death, MI, stroke, and any coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Compared with patients who received heparin plus GP IIbIIIa inhibitors, patients who received bivalirudin had a similar incidence of post-procedural MI, stroke, in-hospital death, MACE (2.88 vs. 2.48, P = 0.30), or transfusion (2.83% vs. 2.41%, P = 0.27). Patients at greater risk of bleeding were more likely to be treated with bivalirudin. After adjusting for the propensity to receive bivalirudin and for baseline co-morbidities, there was no difference in the odds of MACE or the need for transfusion between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with heparin plus GP IIbIIIa inhibition, use of bivalirudin in patients undergoing PCI for stable CAD is associated with similar ischemic and bleeding complications. Given the ease of administration and lower cost, bivalirudin provides an attractive treatment option in this patient population.     

Outcome in high risk patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective : We examined mortality, risk of myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) in high‐risk patients with unprotected left main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Western Denmark. Background : PCI of left main coronary artery lesions may be an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in high‐risk surgical patients. Methods : From January 2005 to May 2007, all patients who had unprotected LM PCI with stent implantation were identified in the Western Denmark Heart Registry. The indications for PCI were: (1) ST segment elevation MI (STEMI), (2) non‐STEMI (NSTEMI) or unstable angina, and (3) stable angina. All patients were followed up for 18 months. Results : A total of 344 patients were treated with LM PCI (STEMI: 71, NSTEMI/unstable angina: 157, and stable angina: 116). In STEMI patients, the median logistic EuroSCORE was 22.5 (interquartile range 12.5–39.5), in non‐STEMI (NSTEMI)/unstable angina patients 13.8 (4.8–23.9), and in stable angina patients 4.8 (2.2–10.4). Mortality after 18 months 38.0, 18.5, and 11.2% (P < 0.001) in patients with STEMI, NSTEMI/unstable angina, and stable angina, respectively. MI after 18 months was 9.9, 6.4, and 6.0% (P = ns), respectively. Four subacute and one late definite stent thrombosis were seen. TLR occurred in 5.6, 4.5, and 6.9% (P = ns) of patients, respectively. Conclusion : After PCI, patients with STEMI and LM culprit lesion have a high‐mortality risk, whereas long‐term outcome for patients with NSTEMI and stable angina pectoris is comparable with other high surgical risk patients with unprotected left main lesion. Further, TLR rates and risk of stent thrombosis were low. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Early angio-guided complete revascularization versus culprit vessel PCI followed by ischemia-guided staged PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease

Background: Optimal management of multivessel disease (MVD) in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still unclear. Objectives: To compare short‐ and long‐term clinical outcomes of early‐staged, angio‐guided approach and delayed, ischemia‐guided treatment of non‐infarct‐related arteries (IRAs). Methods: Consecutive patients with STEMI and MVD treated with primary PCI in 6 tertiary care centers were retrospectively selected and analyzed. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as the composite end‐point of death, MI, and repeat revascularization. All the events were adjudicated according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definitions. Results: In the time period 2004–2008, 800 primary PCIs in STEMI patients with MVD were performed. Four hundred and seventeen were addressed to early‐staged, angio‐guided PCI of non‐IRAs (CR group) and 383 to an incomplete revascularization (IncR group). During the hospital stay, no difference in terms of death and repeat revascularization was found between groups but the incidence of periprocedural MI/reinfarction and MACE was significantly higher in the CR group (13.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.01 and 14.1% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.017, respectively). At a mean follow‐up of 642 ± 545 days, no difference in terms of death and MI was found between the CR and IncR group. The MACE‐free survival was significantly higher in the IncR group (73.8% vs. 57%, log rank 0.05), mainly driven by the lower incidence of re‐PCI. Conclusions: Early complete revascularization based only on angiographic findings in patients with STEMI and MVD is associated with an excess of periprocedural/re‐MI and with a significantly higher incidence of MACE at follow‐up. (J Interven Cardiol 2011;24:535–541)     

Differences in Revascularization Strategy and Outcomes by Clinical Presentations in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

BackgroundSpontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of myocardial infarction (MI). However, the role of revascularization for SCAD according to presentation remains unclear.MethodsWe analyzed patients with SCAD who presented acutely and were participating in the Canadian SCAD Cohort Study. We compared revascularization strategy and clinical outcomes (in-hospital major adverse events and major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE] including recurrent MI at 1-year) in patients with SCAD presenting with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) vs unstable angina or non-STEMI (UA-NSTEMI).ResultsAmong 750 patients with SCAD (mean 51.7 ± 10.5years; 88.5% were women; median follow-up was 373 days), 234 (31.2%) presented with STEMI. More patients with SCAD-STEMI (27.8%) were treated with revascularization (98.5% percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) compared with 8.7% of patients with UA-NSTEMI (93.3% PCI). For patients with SCAD and STEMI, 93.9% were planned procedures vs 71.1% for UA-NSTEMI. Successful or partially successful PCI was 65.5% for STEMI and 76.9% for UA-NSTEMI (P < 0.001). In revascularized patients, 1-year MACE was not different between STEMI and UA-NSTEMI. Revascularization was associated with higher in-hospital major adverse events and its association was more prominent in UA-NSTEMI (STEMI: 26.2% vs 10.7%, P < 0.001; UA-NSTEMI: 37.8% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001). The difference in adverse events according to revascularization diminished over time and was not evident at 1 year.ConclusionsDespite higher in-hospital events with revascularization in patients with SCAD, and higher revascularization with SCAD-STEMI, 1-year MACE was not different compared with UA-NSTEMI. This is reassuring, as revascularization may be required for ongoing ischemia at the time of initial presentation in STEMI-SCAD, and emphasizes the need for careful patient selection for revascularization in UA-NSTEMI.     

Current characteristics and management of ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the Tokyo metropolitan area: from the Tokyo CCU network registered cohort

Limited data exists on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) managed by a well-organized cardiac care network in a metropolitan area. We analyzed the Tokyo CCU network database in 2009–2010. Of 4329 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients including STEMI (n = 3202) and NSTEMI (n = 1127), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 88.8 % of STEMI and 70.4 % of NSTEMI patients. Mean onset-to-door and door-to-balloon times in STEMI patients were shorter than those in NSTEMI patients (167 vs 233 and 60 vs 145 min, respectively, p < 0.001). Coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 4.2 % of STEMI and 11.4 % of NSTEMI patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in STEMI patients than NSTEMI patients (7.7 vs 5.1 %, p < 0.007). Independent correlates of in-hospital mortality were advanced age, low blood pressure, and high Killip classification, statin-treated dyslipidemia and PCI within 24 h were favorable predictors for STEMI. High Killip classification, high heart rate, and hemodialysis were significant predictors of in-hospital mortality, whereas statin-treated dyslipidemia was the only favorable predictor for NSTEMI. In conclusion, patients with MI received PCI frequently (83.5 %) and promptly (door-to-balloon time; 66 min), and had favorable in-hospital prognosis (in-hospital mortality; 7.0 %). In addition to traditional predictors of in-hospital death, statin-treated dyslipidemia was a favorable predictor of in-hospital mortality for STEMI and NSTEMI patients, whereas hemodialysis was the strongest predictor for NSTEMI patients.     

ST-deviation patterns in recurrent myocardial infarctions

Myocardial infarction (MI) may be classified as ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI). We used the term "recurrent MI" (RMI) to denote repeat MI episodes in a particular patient in which a different coronary site is responsible for each episode. We investigated whether the type of RMI is more likely to be of the same type as the index MI or whether patients may have the 2 types of MI at random. The analysis included 305 patients who had >or=2 MI episodes. Acute MIs were classified as STEMI or NSTEMI. We attempted to include only MIs of native vessels, without the presence of extracardiac conditions that intensify myocardial ischemia. Most patients (76%) had repeat episodes of the same MI type, i.e., STEMI or NSTEMI. Recurrent STEMI occurred in 44% of patients, recurrent NSTEMI in 32%, and STEMI and NSTEMI in 24%. Thus, most patients with RMI episodes will have STEMIs or NSTEMIs but not the 2 types, suggesting a predilection of some patients to repeat episodes of occlusive thrombi and others to repeat episodes of nonocclusive thrombi.     

Marked improvements in outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus

We sought to determine if advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with better outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with DM enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) early PTCA Registry (1985-1986) were compared to those in the subsequent contemporary Dynamic Registry (1999-2002) for in-hospital and one-year cardiovascular outcomes. The study population included 945 adults with DM, 325 from the PTCA Registry and 620 from the Dynamic Registry. Multivariable Cox regression models were built to estimate the risk of clinical events. Dynamic Registry patients were older, had more noncardiac comorbidities, and a lower mean ejection fraction (50.5% vs 57.8%, P < or = 0.001) compared to the PTCA Registry patients. The incidence of in-hospital mortality (1.9% vs 4.3%, P < or = 0.05), myocardial infarction (MI) (1.0% vs 7.4%, P 相似文献   

Diabetes mellitus, myocardial reperfusion, and outcome in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty (from HORIZONS AMI)

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases mortality in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but the responsible mechanism is not fully elucidated. We compared the rate of successful myocardial reperfusion measured by tissue myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) and outcomes in patients with and without DM undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. Patients enrolled in the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS AMI) trial were analyzed according to presence of DM with respect to TMPG after PCI and outcomes at 30 days and 3 years. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the independent contribution to mortality of DM and TMPG and the interaction between the 2 was assessed. Complete data were available for 3,265 patients, of whom 533 (16.3%) had DM. Diabetic patients were significantly older and heavier and had more risk factors for coronary disease and more previous MI, revascularization, and heart failure. There were no differences in rates of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow after PCI in the infarct artery or TMPG 2/3 between patients with and without DM. Compared to nondiabetics, mortality was significantly higher at 30 days and at 3 years in the DM group (1.8% vs 4.5%, p = 0.0002 and 5.4% vs 11.0%, p <0.0001, respectively). DM and TMPG were significantly associated with 3-year mortality, but there was no statistical interaction between DM and TMPG (p = 0.70). In conclusion, DM is associated with a significantly higher risk of death but this association is not mediated by impaired epicardial or myocardial reperfusion.     

The Association of Previous Revascularization With In-Hospital Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or no previous revascularization undergoing primary PCI.BackgroundLimited data exist regarding door-to-balloon times and clinical outcomes of STEMI patients with a history of CABG or PCI undergoing primary PCI.MethodsWe examined 15,628 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI at 297 sites in the United States. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to compare door-to-balloon time delays >90 min and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE).ResultsPatients with previous CABG were significantly older and more likely to have multiple comorbidities (p < 0.0001). Previous CABG was associated with a lower likelihood of a door-to-balloon time ≤90 min compared with patients with no previous revascularization. However, no significant differences in door-to-balloon times were noted between patients with previous PCI and those without previous revascularization. The unadjusted MACCE risk was significantly higher in patients with a history of CABG compared with patients without previous revascularization (odds ratio: 1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.23 to 2.31). However, after multivariable risk adjustment, there were no significant differences in MACCE risk between the 2 groups. No significant differences in in-hospital outcomes were seen in patients with a previous PCI and those without previous revascularization.ConclusionsIn a large cohort of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, patients with previous CABG were more likely to have reperfusion delays, yet risk-adjusted, in-hospital outcomes were similar to those without previous revascularization. No significant differences in reperfusion timeliness and in-hospital outcomes were seen in patients with a history of PCI compared with patients without previous revascularization.     

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Disease in New Zealand: National Linkage Study of Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes (ANZACS-QI 38)

BackgroundApproximately 5% of coronary angiographies detect LMS disease >50%. Recent randomized trials showed PCI has comparable outcomes to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in low or intermediate risk candidates. In clinical practice, PCI is frequently utilized in those with prohibitive surgical risk. We reviewed contemporary national results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary disease (LMS) disease in New Zealand.MethodsAll patients undergoing PCI for LMS disease from 01/09/2014–24/09/2017 were extracted from the All New Zealand Acute Coronary Syndrome–Quality Improvement registry with national dataset linkage, analyzing characteristics and in-hospital outcomes.ResultsThe cohort included 469 patients, mean age 70.8 ± 10.7 years, male 331 (71%), and the majority 339 (72%) were unprotected LMS. Indications include ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) 83 (18%) and NSTEMI or unstable angina 229 (49%). Compared with protected LMS, unprotected LMS were more likely to present with an acute coronary syndrome (73% versus 48%, P < 0.001), and to die in-hospital (9.4% versus 3.9%, P = 0.045). In those with unprotected LMS, in-hospital mortality after acute STEMI PCI was higher than for other indications (21.1% versus 6.1%, P < 0.001). Independent predictors of in-hospital death and major adverse cardiovascular events included STEMI, femoral access and worse renal function.ConclusionOur LMS PCI cohort had high mortality rates, especially those presenting with STEMI and an unprotected LMS. This reflects the contemporary real-world practice of LMS PCI being predominantly performed in high risk patients which differs from randomized trial populations, and this should be considered before comparing with CABG outcomes.     

ST-segment elevation versus non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in current smokers after newer-generation drug-eluting stent implantation

We compared the 2-year major clinical outcomes between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) in patients who are current smokers who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). The availability of data in this regard is limited.A total of 8357 AMI patients were included and divided into 2 groups: the STEMI group (n = 5124) and NSTEMI group (n = 3233). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), or coronary repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of the individual components of MACE and stent thrombosis (definite or probable).After propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, 2 PSM groups (2250 pairs, C-statistics = 0.795) were generated. In the PSM patients, both for 1 month and at 2 years, the cumulative incidence of MACE (P = .183 and P = .655, respectively), all-cause death, cardiac death, re-MI, all-cause death or MI, any repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis (P = .998 and P = .341, respectively) was not significantly different between the STEMI and NSTEMI groups. In addition, these results were confirmed using multivariate analysis.In the era of contemporary newer-generation DESs, both during 1 month and at 2 years after index PCI, the major clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the STEMI and NSTEMI groups confined to the patients who are current smokers. However, further research is needed to confirm these results.