Absence of evidence of infection with divergent primate T-lymphotropic viruses in United States blood donors who have seroindeterminate HTLV test results

BACKGROUND: Recent identification of divergent simian or primate T-lymphotropic viruses (STLVs; PTLVs) in bonobos (formerly called pygmy chimpanzees; Pan paniscus; viruses: STLVpan-p and STLVpp1664) and a baboon (Papio hamadryas; viruses: STLVph969 or PTLV-L) have raised the possibility of human infection with these viruses. Divergent PTLV-infected primate sera show p24 bands on HTLV-I Western blots (WBs). It was investigated whether infection by divergent PTLV-like viruses could explain a subset of United States blood donors who reacted on HTLV-I EIAs and had indeterminate HTLV-I WBs with p24 bands. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Epidemiologic characteristics of 1889 donors with HTLV-I-indeterminate WBs were compared to those of donors with confirmed retrovirus infections (393 with HIV, 201 with HTLV-I, 513 with HTLV-II) and 1.6 million donors with nonreactive screening tests. To directly probe for infection with divergent PTLVs, 2 HTLV-I-indeterminate donors born in Africa and 269 representative non-African-born donors with p24 bands on HTLV-I WBs (previously shown to be negative for HTLV-I and -II DNA by PCR) were selected for PTLV PCR analysis. DNA from peripheral blood MNC samples was tested for a proviral tax sequence by PCR using generic primers that amplify HTLV-I, HTLV-II, and the divergent PTLVs. Amplified tax sequences were detected by Southern blot hybridization to a (32)P-labeled generic PTLV probe. PCR-positive samples could then be typed by hybridization with virus-specific internal probes that differentiate HTLV-I, HTLV-II, PTLV-L, and STLVpan-p. RESULTS: In the epidemiologic analysis, HTLV-indeterminate status was independently associated with age of at least 25 years (OR = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.93-2.49), black (OR = 3.27; 95% CI, 2.90-3.67) or Hispanic (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.52-2.16) race or ethnicity, and donation at one blood center (Baltimore) (OR = 1. 30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.53). None of the 271 HTLV-I WB-indeterminate samples tested positive by generic PTLV PCR analysis. CONCLUSION: Although the epidemiologic data suggest the possibility of undiagnosed HTLV-I, HTLV-II, or a cross-reactive virus such as PTLV among older, black, and Hispanic blood donors, the PCR data do not support the presence of divergent PTLV infection among US blood donors with HTLV-I-indeterminate results.     

Human T-lymphotropic virus type I among blood donors from Guadeloupe: donation, demographic, and biologic characteristics

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data on human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) in Guadeloupe (French West Indies) are scant. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From January 1989 to December 1996, 59,426 blood donors were screened by enzyme immunoassay for antibodies to HTLV-I. All repeatedly reactive samples were confirmed by Western blot. Temporal trends in HTLV-I seropositivity rates were examined during the study period. A multivariate analysis of donation, demographic, and biologic characteristics was performed. RESULTS: Of the screened blood donors, 195 were confirmed as seropositive, for an overall prevalence of 0.33 percent (95% CI 0.28-0.38). A marked decrease in overall HTLV-I prevalence with time (from 0.47% in 1989 to 0.13% in 1996) was observed, which can be explained mainly by the decreasing percentage of recruited new donors during the study period. Four independent risk factors for HTLV-I were identified: new donor status (odds ratio [OR] 12.5), female sex (OR 1.7), increasing age (30-39 years: OR, 2.4; 40-49 years: OR, 3.7; >50 years: OR 6.6), and positive antibodies to hepatitis B virus core antigen (OR, 1.7). Selection of specific locations for blood collection was inversely associated with HTLV-I (OR 0.5). CONCLUSION: New donor status, advancing age, female sex, and positivity for hepatitis B virus core antibodies were the major factors associated with HTLV-I infection in Guadeloupe.     

Sensitivity and specificity of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) types I and II polymerase chain reaction and several serologic assays in screening a population with a high prevalence of HTLV-II

BACKGROUND: Since 1988, all blood donations in the United States have been screened for antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I). However, the sensitivity of current serologic tests for the detection of HTLV type II (HTLV-II) antibodies and the diagnostic utility of direct tests for HTLV-I and -II using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are poorly defined.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-nine HTLV-I- or -II-seropositive and 687 age- and sex-matched seronegative samples from a high-risk population at an inner-city emergency department were selected. All samples were tested with four HTLV enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), one Western blot assay and one type-specific Western blot assay, one HTLV type-specific EIA, and a research HTLV-I/II PCR kit.
RESULTS: Sensitivity of the various EIAs ranged from 95.1 to 99.5 percent, and specificity ranged from 97.2 to 99.4 percent. PCR performed in duplicate without selective retesting had lower sensitivity (85.1%) and specificity (88.0%). However, PCR detected 20 (3.2%) HTLV-I-positive and 47 (7.5%) HTLV-II-positive samples among the 627 samples that were negative in all EIAs. The type-specific EIA and PCR assay had the highest rate of concordance in classifying samples as either HTLV-I or -II, with the type-specific EIA and type-specific Western blot having the next highest rates of concordance.
CONCLUSION: In this sample set from a population at high risk for HTLV-II, screening with HTLV-I/II PCR had lower sensitivity and specificity than that with EIAs. However, 4.1 to 10.8 percent of samples were PCR positive but seronegative for HTLV-I or –II, and their true infection status remains undetermined.     

Sensitivity and specificity of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) types I and II polymerase chain reaction and several serologic assays in screening a population with a high prevalence of HTLV-II

BACKGROUND: Since 1988, all blood donations in the United States have been screened for antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I). However, the sensitivity of current serologic tests for the detection of HTLV type II (HTLV-II) antibodies and the diagnostic utility of direct tests for HTLV-I and -II using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are poorly defined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-nine HTLV-I- or -II-seropositive and 687 age- and sex-matched seronegative samples from a high-risk population at an inner-city emergency department were selected. All samples were tested with four HTLV enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), one Western blot assay and one type-specific Western blot assay, one HTLV type-specific EIA, and a research HTLV-I/II PCR kit. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the various EIAs ranged from 95.1 to 99.5 percent, and specificity ranged from 97.2 to 99.4 percent. PCR performed in duplicate without selective retesting had lower sensitivity (85.1 %) and specificity (88.0%). However, PCR detected 20 (3.2%) HTLV-I-positive and 47 (7.5%) HTLV-II-positive samples among the 627 samples that were negative in all EIAs. The type-specific EIA and PCR assay had the highest rate of concordance in classifying samples as either HTLV-I or II, with the type-specific EIA and type-specific Western blot having the next highest rates of concordance. CONCLUSION: In this sample set from a population at high risk for HTLV-II, screening with HTLV-I/II PCR had lower sensitivity and specificity than that with EIAs. However, 4.1 to 10.8 percent of samples were PCR positive but seronegative for HTLV-I or -II, and their true infection status remains undetermined.     

Comparative evaluation of 14 immunoassays for detection of antibodies to the human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II using panels of sera from Sweden and West Africa

BACKGROUND: A new generation of assays for the detection of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I/II) antibodies has been released. These assays incorporate HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-specific antigens, and some are based on new assay principles. Comparative evaluation data that include these new as well as previous assays are limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen HTLV antibody assays were evaluated by using well-characterized panels of sera from Guinea-Bissau, West Africa, and Sweden. The sera included 127 HTLV-I-positive and 62 HTLV-II-positive specimens, as well as 919 consecutive negative samples. RESULTS: The sensitivity for HTLV-I was 100 percent for all assays, except one, which repeatedly missed one sample. The sensitivity for HTLV-II varied between 86 percent and 100 percent. In general, new-generation assays incorporating HTLV-II-specific antigens, and some of which are based on new assay principles, had a higher sensitivity for HTLV-II than previous assays, which mainly are based on HTLV-I antigens. The specificity was generally higher for new assays than for the previous versions. Testing of Swedish blood donor sera gave higher specificities (94-100%) than did that of African specimens (90-99.7%). Most assays had low delta values (DVs), although there was a tendency toward increased DVs for the new generation of assays. Only two of the new generation of assays came close to a combination of high sensitivity for both HTLV-I and HTLV-II, high specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and high DVs. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity for HTLV-I was generally high and appears to have improved for HTLV-II with the introduction of a new generation of assays incorporating HTLV-II-specific antigens. However, some assays still give false-negative results on HTLV-II-positive specimens. The specificities and the DVs were generally higher for the new assays than for the previous versions.     

Multicenter evaluation of PCR methods for detecting CMV DNA in blood donors

BACKGROUND: CMV DNA screening may be a useful adjunct to serologic tests in distinguishing potentially infectious blood donations from those that are "CMV-safe." However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal assay method for accurate detection of CMV DNA in donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A blinded multicenter evaluation of seven CMV PCR assays was performed by five laboratories by using coded sets of analytical controls and donor blood samples. RESULTS: Five assays displayed sufficient sensitivity for donor screening, as judged by consistent detection of a minimum of 25 CMV genome equivalents (geq) in analytical controls constructed to contain from 1 to 100 CMV geq in background DNA from 250,000 cells, while the other two assays displayed inadequate sensitivity. Three sensitive assays, two based on nested PCR directed at the UL93 and UL32 regions of the CMV genome and another test (Monitor Assay, Roche), did not detect CMV DNA in samples from any of 20 pedigreed CMV-seronegative, Western blot-negative (S-/WB-) donors. Two other assays based on nested PCR occasionally detected CMV DNA in S-WB- samples, and one sensitive nested PCR assay directed at UL123 detected CMV DNA in a large proportion (85%) of S-WB- samples. CONCLUSION: Seven CMV PCR assays currently used for research and/or diagnostic applications displayed marked variations in sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility when applied to coded analytical and clinical control samples containing cellular DNA from the equivalent of 250,000 WBCs. These results will be useful in the selection of assays with performance characteristics appropriate to donor screening objectives. They may also help explain discrepant findings from previous studies that used PCR to determine CMV DNA prevalence in seronegative and seropositive blood donors.     

Comparative performances of an HTLV-I/II EIA and other serologic and PCR assays on samples from persons at risk for HTLV-II infection

BACKGROUND: HTLV-I and HTLV-II are related exogenous pathogenic human retroviruses. Until recently, ELISAs based on HTLV-I antigens have been used to screen for the presence of HTLV-I or -II antibodies. The HTLV-I-based assays have not been as sensitive in detecting antibodies to HTLV-II as in detecting antibodies to HTLV-I. The Abbott HTLV-I/HTLV-II ELISA uses a combination of HTLV-I and HTLV-II antigens to detect antibodies to the whole HTLV group. The performance of this ELISA was compared to that of several HTLV-I-based serologic assays and an HTLV-II PCR assay in cohorts of South American Indians and New York City IV drug users (IVDUs) in whom HTLV-II is endemic. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera from 429 South American Indians and New York City IVDUs were evaluated for HTLV antibodies by the use of three ELISAs (rgp21-enhanced HTLV-I/II, Cambridge Biotech; Vironostika HTLV-I/II, Organon Teknika; and HTLV-I/HTLV-II, Abbott), and a Western blot (WB) assay. Peripheral blood leukocyte DNA from each person was analyzed for HTLV-I and HTLV-II pol DNA via PCR. The HTLV-II PCR-positive samples were further subtyped via cloning and sequencing and/or oligomer restriction. RESULTS: Two hundred four samples (48%) were positive for HTLV-II by serologic and/or PCR assays. All of the positive samples from the Indians and approximately one-third of the positive samples from the IVDUs were of the HTLV-IIB subtype. Comparative analyses indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of the various assays were: PCR, 98 and 100 percent; Abbott HTLV-I/HTLV-II, 78 and 95 percent; Cambridge Biotech HTLV-I/II, 76 and 96 percent; Vironostika HTLV-I/II, 71 and 98 percent; and WB, 73 and 100 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences among the sensitivities and specificities of the HTLV-I/II ELISAs (p values, 0.056-0.438). The WB and PCR assays were much more specific than the other serologic assays (p相似文献   

Seroprevalence of human herpes virus 8 antibody in populations at high or low risk of transfusion, graft, or sexual transmission of viruses

BACKGROUND: The routes of transmission of human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8) remain unclear. In particular, HHV-8 transmission by blood components and organ transplantation is still debated and raises public health issues. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of anti-HHV-8 in selected populations of persons or patients with or without risk factors for the transmission of viral infections, in order to determine the routes of HHV-8 transmission. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1431 persons or patients at low or high risk of sexually, blood-, or graft-transmitted viral infections were tested by means of a standardized immunofluorescence serologic assay detecting anti-HHV-8. RESULTS: The persons or patients could be classified into three distinct groups according to anti-HHV-8 prevalence: a low prevalence group (0.0% to 5.0%), including healthy blood donors, healthy pregnant women, multiply transfused patients with thalassemia major, and IV drug users; an intermediate prevalence group (5.0% to 20.0%), including organ donors, kidney transplant recipients, and multiply transfused patients with sickle cell disease; a high prevalence group (>20.0%), including HIV-negative persons at high risk of sexually-transmitted viral infections, and HIV-infected homosexual men and heterosexuals. CONCLUSION: The sexual route appears to be the main route of HHV-8 transmission; bloodborne transmission of HHV-8, if it exists, is rare. In contrast, organ transplantation recipients might be exposed to HHV-8 transmission by the transplanted organ, which raises the issue of systematic screening of organ donors.     

Prevalence of the newly described human circovirus, TTV, in United States blood donors

BACKGROUND: A novel nonenveloped single-stranded circular DNA virus (TTV) was recently identified. The prevalence of TTV in blood donors in the United States is, however, still unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Viral DNA was detected in US blood donors from five cities by using two sets of TTV primers: NG059/NG061/NG063 primers, which amplified the conserved region of strains 1 and 2, and T801/T935 primers, which amplified the 5' end region of the TTV sequence. A TTV antibody assay system was based on the detection of the truncated open reading frame (ORF)-1 (amino acids 1-411) from type 1b. The truncated ORF-1 was expressed as a fusion protein in Escherichia coli, and the fusion protein was used as the antigen in the antibody assay system. RESULTS: Viremia was detected in 21 (8. 4%) of 250 donors by use of NG059/NG061/NG063 primers and 104 (41. 6%) of 250 by use of T801/T935 primers. There was little correlation among the assays, which suggests the preferential detection of different strains with the different primers. TTV antibody was detected in 38 of 100 donors: 32 (84%) of 38 with concurrent TTV viremia and 6 (16%) of 38 without TTV viremia. TTV viremia and/or TTV antibody-positive samples were detected in 52 (52%) of 100 of US blood donors. CONCLUSION: Evidence of infection or exposure to TTV appears to be common among blood donors in United States.     

Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae antigenin PBMNCs of healthy blood donors

BACKGROUND: Because it has been increasingly recognized that Chlamydia pneumoniae may be linked to some chronic inflammatory diseases, including atherosclerosis, detection of this pathogen in blood from patients may be valuable in the diagnosis of such diseases. However, the prevalence of chlamydia in the blood of healthy donors has not yet been extensively studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The presence of C. pneumoniae in PBMNCs obtained from healthy persons who donated blood for blood transfusion was assessed by a PCR that was specific for the C. pneumoniae 16S rRNA gene and by the use of staining with FITC-conjugated chlamydia MoAb. RESULTS: Twenty-one (8.9%) of 237 blood samples tested showed the presence of C. pneumoniae DNA and antigen in the PBMNCs. There was no significant difference in the presence of chlamydia in blood according to sex or to age between 20 and 59 years of age. However, a possible seasonal variation in the presence of chlamydia in blood from healthy donors was suggested by the results obtained. CONCLUSION: A significant percentage of healthy donors carry C. pneumoniae, which may be a risk factor for some chronic diseases.     

Seroindeterminate patterns and seroconversions to human T-lymphotropic virus type I positivity in blood donors from Martinique, French West Indies

BACKGROUND: Screening for human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) antibodies in volunteer blood donors has been systematic in the French West Indies since 1989. Western blot-indeterminate results are commonly obtained. The significance of these indeterminate serologic patterns in HTLV-I-endemic areas is still unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: During a 2-year period, 9759 blood donors were tested for HTLV-I antibodies. The epidemiologic features of HTLV-I-seropositive, -seroindeterminate, and -seronegative donors were compared. A lookback investigation was performed for the HTLV-I-seropositive donors, and the HTLV-I-seroindeterminate individuals were followed up. RESULTS: Thirty-nine donors (0.4%) were HTLV-I seropositive and 49 (0.5%) were seroindeterminate. The age and sex ratio characteristics of the seroindeterminate donors are divergent from those of the HTLV-I-seropositive group and are more like those of the seronegative population. However, during the study period, three cases of seroconversion after an initial seroindeterminate profile were reported. Two cases were detected through follow-up of 38 HTLV-I-seroindeterminate donors over a mean of 8 months (2-24 months). The third seroconverter belonged to the HTLV-I-seropositive group and was identified through lookback investigation. This case is atypical, with p19 reactivity for several months before HTLV-I seropositivity. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that, although HTLV-I-seroindeterminate donors mainly are HTLV-I-noninfected, the rate of seroconversion in a repeat blood donor population from an endemic region must be taken into consideration. Moreover, the case of delayed seroconversion observed in this study suggests the difficulty of counseling seroindeterminate blood donors in endemic regions.     

Infectious disease markers in young blood donors. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether the active recruitment of young donors of high school and college age could affect the safety of the blood supply, prevalence and incidence rates of infectious disease markers among donors aged 17 to 18 and 19 to 22 were compared to those in donors 23 years of age and older. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Over 15 percent of 4.97 million whole blood donations were collected from donors aged 17 to 18 and 19 to 22. Prevalence (per 100,000 first-time donors) and incidence (per 100,000 person-years) rates for confirmed infectious diseases were compared between age groups. RESULTS: The prevalence estimates for HIV, HCV, HTLV-I and -II, and serologic tests for syphilis (STS) were significantly lower among first-time donors aged 17 to 18 and 19 to 22 than among those 23 to 44 years of age. HBsAg prevalence was higher in the first-time donors in the younger groups than in first-time donors in the older group because of higher prevalences among Asians and blacks. The incidence rates of HIV, HCV, and HTLV were similar in the younger groups and the older group. Donors 19 to 22 years of age had a higher incidence rate of estimated HBV than did donors aged 23 to 44 and 45+ (p<0.001), but the incidence rate of STS was lower in donors aged 17 to 18 and 19 to 22 than in donors 23 to 44 and 45+ years of age (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Aggressive recruitment of school-age donors should not result in an increased risk of transmission-transmitted infections, with the possible exception of HBV.     

Detection of microchimerism by PCR is a function of amplification strategy

BACKGROUND: Suitable detection methods are needed to support larger studies of microchimerism and the allogeneic exposures that may be etiologically related to it. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A twotier PCR strategy for microchimerism detection was developed on the basis of the observation that assay sensitivity for the detection of microchimerism depends on the specificity with which primer pairs recognize sequences unique to the minor population. First, specimens are tested to determine the host HLA class II genotype by using a locus-specific PCR strategy with low sensitivity for microchimerism. Then, a sequence-specific PCR analysis having high sensitivity for detection of microchimerism is applied to detect and quantitate the minor population. Locus-specific, group-specific, and sequence-specific amplification strategies for the detection of distinct minor WBC populations prepared ex vivo were compared. In addition, 39 clinical samples from patients with known transfusion-associated microchimerism and 20 umbilical cord blood (CB) specimens containing maternal WBCs were studied. RESULTS: Locus-specific amplification detected 17 (94%) of 18 cases in which microchimerism was present at 10 percent, but only 1 of 51 cases with microchimerism < or = 1 percent. Group-specific amplification detected all 63 cases with minor populations present at > or = 0.10 percent, but only 16 of 21 cases at the 0.01 percent level. Sequence-specific amplification detected 100 percent of cases down to the 0.01 percent level. When applied to clinical samples, locus-specific amplification reliably identified the major population but proved insensitive to low-level minor populations. CONCLUSIONS: For the detection of microchimerism, assay sensitivity is a function of amplification strategy. These results suggest a simple approach to population screening for microchimerism: the background population of WBCs is typed by a locus-specific method, while minor population(s) can then be sought by using one or several sequence-specific amplifications.     

The expression of NA antigens in people with unusual Fcgamma receptor III genotypes

BACKGROUND: The Fcgamma receptor IIIb (FcgammaRIIIB) genes that encode neutrophil-specific antigens NA1 and NA2 differ at 5 nucleotides (nts); in 4, the result is an amino acid (AA) difference between the two alleles. The role of each of these differences in antigen expression is not known. Persons with FcgammaRIIIB genes that differ from NA1-FcgammaRIIIB and NA2-FcgammaRIIIB by 1 nt have been described. This study compared NA1 and NA2 expression on granulocytes in persons with variant FcgammaRIIIB genes and in healthy blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Reactions of NA1- and NA2-specific MoAbs and alloantibodies with granulocytes were assessed by flow cytometry in 74 healthy blood donors and 6 persons with known variant FcgammaRIIIB genes. The granulocytes were tested with 1 NA1-specific MoAb, 1 NA2-specific MoAb, 4 NA1-specific alloantibodies, and 4 NA2-specific alloantibodies. RESULTS: Analysis of granulocytes from persons with variant NA genotypes found that single-base substitutions in FcgammaRIIIB at 141 and at 349 are important in NA1 expression and those at 227 and 277 are important in NA2 expression. Among blood donors, neither age, sex, nor race affected the expression of NA1 or NA2. The NA2-specific MoAb reacted more intensely with granulocytes from NA2-double-dose cells than with those from NA-single-dose cells, but this was not true for the NA2-specific alloantibodies. There was no difference in the reactions of the NA1-specific MoAbs and alloantibodies with donor samples of known NA1-double-dose or NA-single-dose cells. The intensity of reactions of both the NA1- and NA2-specific MoAbs and alloantibodies were strongly correlated on double-dose cells but not on single-dose cells. In fact, granulocytes from 7 healthy blood donors, phenotyped as NA-single-dose with the MoAbs, were phenotyped as NA2-double-dose with the alloantibodies. Variations in FcgammaRIIIB are common in blacks, but 5 of the 6 donors were white. These results suggest that FcgammaRIIIB variations may be common in both whites and blacks. CONCLUSIONS: NA2 expression is affected by polymorphisms in FcgammaRIIIB 227 and FcgammaRIIIB 277, both of which are involved in an FcgammaRIIIb N-glycosylation site. Polymorphisms in FcgammaRIIIB at 141 and 349 appear more important to NA1 expression.     

Laboratory performance in HTLV-I/II analysis

BACKGROUND: Since 1989, the CDC's Model Performance Evaluation Program has shipped samples to voluntary participant laboratories that test for HTLV antibodies. Each laboratory tests the well-characterized samples, reports the results, and provides information about its testing practices. The data from 15 performance survey periods are reported here. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze all data from 15 survey periods from 1989 through 1996. RESULTS: The mean analytic sensitivity for EIA was 99.2 percent per survey period (range, 96-100%), the mean analytic specificity was 97.8 percent (75.6-100%), and the overall accuracy was 88.8 percent (63.8-100%). The mean analytic sensitivity for Western blot was 88.8 percent (75.6-100%); the mean analytic specificity was 95.7 percent (86.7-100%), and the overall accuracy was 91.1 percent (78.1-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Statistical analyses suggested associations between performance and both the retroviral serologic status of the sample and the analytical testing method. Western blot accuracy was associated with weekly testing volume. In early survey periods, performance problems were noted in the analysis of samples from donors with concomitant HTLV and HIV infections and those from donors who were positive for HTLV-II. Technological developments in test methods, such as the addition of recombinant antigens, appeared to have improved the laboratory performance of specific testing methods.     

Routine HCV PCR screening of blood donations to identify early HCV infection in blood donors lacking antibodies to HCV

BACKGROUND: Detection of early hepatitis C infection of blood donors is still a major problem for blood transfusion. Common anti-HCV screening assays show differences in sensitivity and specificity. The often mild symptoms of acute hepatitis C also cause difficulties in the identification of early HCV infection. The feasibility and efficacy of routine screening of blood donations for HCV RNA were investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood donations (n = 251,737) were screened for HCV RNA over 4 years. RNA extraction, amplification, and detection were done by two commercial HCV PCR kits (HCV Cobas Amplicor and HCV Cobas Amplicor 2.0, Roche Diagnostics). Screening was done by pool testing with a maximum pool size of 40 serum samples. RESULTS: Three donations out of 251,737 were HCV RNA positive and anti-HCV negative. ALT levels of these donations were 271, 32, and 10 U per L. The HCV infection of a fourth HCV RNA-positive donor could not be identified by routine, second-generation HCV EIA (Abbott Diagnostika). In this case, two previous donations were also HCV RNA positive, and three second-generation test systems (Abbott) could not detect anti-HCV, whereas third-generation anti-HCV screening assays detected antibody with different sensitivity. The first HCV RNA-positive donation was identified only by the HCV ELISA 3.0 (Ortho Diagnostic Systems). The results of confirmatory assays like RIBA HCV 3.0 (Ortho) and Matrix (Abbott) indicate a restricted immune response to NS3 only. CONCLUSION: HCV RNA detection by PCR can be carried out routinely in blood donor screening without significant delay of release of the components. The residual risk of transmission can be reduced by identification of early infection, which can lead to an improved safety of blood components. RNA screening can also be advantageous in cases of incomplete or lack of antibody response to HCV.     

Differentiation of autologous ABO, RHD, RHCE, KEL, JK, and FY blood group genotypes by analysis of peripheral blood samples of patients who have recently received multiple transfusions

BACKGROUND: After multiple transfusions, the serologic typing of autologous blood group phenotypes is difficult, because of mixed RBC populations. The genotyping of ABO, Rh, Kell, Kidd, and Duffy systems could be used to determine autologous blood group antigen status. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood samples from patients and donors were analyzed before and after 26 multiple-transfusion events. An average of 6.9 non-WBC-reduced RBC units with an average age of 5.9 days were administered per transfusion event. The average period of blood sampling after transfusions was 5.3 days. All samples were serologically phenotyped for ABO, Rh, Kell, Kidd, and Duffy. Pretransfusion, posttransfusion, and buccal samples from patients were genotyped for the corresponding alleles by a uniform PCR sequence-specific primer protocol that allowed their simultaneous determination within 3 hours. RESULTS: All posttransfusion samples exhibited mixed-cell populations of various blood group systems on serologic testing. Genotyping from peripheral blood produced results identical to the autologous blood group phenotypes, regardless of the amount of blood transfused or of the length of the sampling period after transfusion. CONCLUSION: A fast and reliable PCR-sequence-specific primer DNA genotyping assay for simultaneous determination of autologous ABO, Rh, Kell, Kidd, and Duffy blood groups can be performed on peripheral blood samples, even though the patients have recently received multiple transfusions.     

Transfusion transmission of human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) from an asymptomatic blood donor: conservation of LTR U3, env, and tax nucleotide sequences in a recipient with HTLV-I-associated myelopathy

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) contaminated blood is sometimes linked with the rapid onset of HTLV-I- associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) in immunocompromised recipients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study addressed the question of whether HTLV-I variants could emerge in an immunocompromised patient who developed HAM/ TSP after the transfusion of blood from an asymptomatic HTLV-I carrier. Base pairs (n = 2327) of the HTLV-I genome located in the LTR U3 region and parts of the env and tax genes were sequenced and compared to the isolated identified in the asymptomatic blood donor and to well-known ATK-1 and H5 strains. The same analysis was performed on another set of samples from an asymptomatic HTLV-I-positive blood donor and a similar blood recipient. RESULTS: No critical changes in nucleotide sequences were identified in the immunosuppressed HAM/TSP patient when compared with the nucleotide sequences of the corresponding blood donor, the other asymptomatic blood donor and recipient or the ATK-1 and H5 strains. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppression does not seem to favor the emergence of particular nucleotide sequences in the genome located in the LTR U3 region or in parts of the env and tax genes in transfused patients who develop HAM/TSP.     

Frequent presence of HBV in the sera of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive blood donors

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have revealed that HBV may not be cleared even after the disappearance of serum HBsAg. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the replication of HBV persists in HBsAg-negative blood donors who lack apparent liver disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum HBV was examined by using PCR coupled with Southern blotting in 50 blood donors who were identified to be HBsAg negative but anti-HBc positive. RESULTS: HBV DNA was detected in the sera from 19 (38%) of 50 donors. In 11 of the 19, HBV existed exclusively as immune complexes, while HBV presumably did not exist as immune complexes in the remaining eight. The levels of HBV DNA were similar to those in patients who had recovered from acute HBV. Some nucleotide substitutions, which did not confer amino acid changes in the major epitope of HBsAg, were found in the preS-S regions. CONCLUSION: The replication of HBV is ongoing in a substantial proportion of healthy blood donors who have anti-HBc. Blood from such donors may contain very low levels of HBV free of immune complex formation and should be excluded for transfusion. The fact that such blood donors apparently lacked liver disease suggests no pathogenicity of such "occult" HBV.     

Surveillance of HIV-1 genetic subtypesand diversity in the US blood supply

BACKGROUND: Recent reports of variant (non-subtype B) HIV infections in US populations have raised concerns about the sensitivity of subtype B virus-based donor screening and diagnostic assays. This study was designed to determine the prevalence and genetic diversity of HIV subtypes in US blood donors over the last two decades. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Three groups were studied: hemophiliacs infected by clotting factor concentrates in the early 1980s (n = 49), blood donors retrospectively identified as being seropositive in 1985 (n = 97), and blood donors identified as seropositive between 1993 and 1996 (n = 405). Subtype assignment was based primarily on heteroduplex mobility analysis (HMA) of HIV-1 env, with DNA sequence confirmation of selected specimens. HIV peptide-based EIA serotyping was used to rule out HIV-2 and group O infections and to serotype HMA-refractory specimens. RESULTS: Of 551 specimens, 535 (97%) were assigned subtypes; 532 (99%) of these were subtype B. Three postscreening donations (1%) were assigned non-B subtypes (2 A, 1 C). Two of these three donors were born in Africa; the third was born in the United States and reported no risk factors other than heterosexual activity. HMA distribution plots showed an increase in env diversity among HIV-1 group B strains over time. CONCLUSION: The results support the need for continued surveillance of HIV subtype diversity and ongoing validation of the sensitivity of HIV diagnostic assays to non-B subtype infections.