"Maximal" drug therapy is not necessarily optimal in chronic angina pectoris

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents, nitrates and calcium channel antagonists are effective in treating angina pectoris, but much remains unknown about how they act in combination. Consequently, treadmill exercise was used to assess the relative efficacy of nifedipine or isosorbide dinitrate, or both, in 19 patients with stable angina receiving propranolol. Propranolol therapy was continued and either placebo, nifedipine (20 mg), isosorbide dinitrate (20 mg) or both drugs were given randomly 1 1/2 hours before exercise in a double-blind trial. In 16 patients who completed the protocol, heart rate at rest during propranolol therapy was 53.7 +/- 1.9 beats/min (mean +/- standard error of the mean); it increased 4.6 +/- 1.2 beats/min with the addition of nifedipine (p less than 0.01), but was unchanged with isosorbide dinitrate or both combined. Compared with values during treatment with propranolol alone, systolic blood pressure at rest decreased with each vasodilator individually and when combined. Rate-pressure product at maximal exercise was the same with all combinations. Exercise duration was 467 +/- 50 seconds with propranolol, increased to 556 +/- 47 seconds with isosorbide dinitrate (p less than 0.05) and to 636 +/- 50 seconds with nifedipine (p less than 0.001). Exercise duration with all three drugs was 597 +/- 47 seconds (p less than 0.01 compared with propranolol alone). The improvement with nifedipine was greater than with isosorbide dinitrate (p less than 0.05) but exercise duration was not significantly different with the combination of these drugs than when either drug was used alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Concomitant calcium antagonist plus isosorbide dinitrate therapy for markedly active variant angina

The present study was performed to assess the efficacy of concomitant calcium antagonist/isosorbide dinitrate therapy in patients with frequent episodes of variant angina and to compare such combination therapy with isosorbide dinitrate alone. We enrolled nine such patients (six men and three women, aged 47 ± 9 [mean ± standard deviation] years) in a long-term comparison of (1) oral isosorbide dinitrate (117 ± 63 mg per day) alone, (2) verapamil (453 ± 75 mg per day) + isosorbide dinitrate (given in the same dose as stated above), and (3) nifedipine (71 ± 14 mg per day) + isosorbide dinitrate (also given in the same dose as stated), each administered for 2 months. During isosorbide dinitrate therapy, these nine patients averaged 23.7 ± 37.3 chest pains per week, consumed 24.4 ± 47.4 sublingual nitroglycerin tablets per week, and demonstrated 46.5 ± 43.2 episodes per week of transient ST segment deviations on calibrated two-channel Holter monitoring. During therapy with verapamil/isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine/isosorbide dinitrate, the frequency of angina and ST segment deviations was dramatically reduced (verapamil/isosorbide dinitrate, 3.9 ± 3.6 chest pains per week and 3.5 ± 2.6 ST segment deviations per week, p < 0.05; nifedipine/isosorbide dinitrate, 3.1 ± 4.0 chest pains per week and 5.5 ± 6.6 ST segment deviations per week, p < 0.05). In all respects, verapamil/isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine/isosorbide dinitrate were similar to one another. Thus, in patients with very frequent episodes of variant angina, a calcium antagonist/isosorbide dinitrate combination is much more effective than isosorbide dinitrate alone in reducing the frequency of angina and ischemic ECG alterations.     

Molsidomine and isosorbide dinitrate:/their comparative effectiveness in patients with exertion-induced stenocardia

The markedness and duration of antianginal effects of 2 mg molsidomine and 10 mg isosorbide dinitrate were compared by means of repeated treadmill tests in 37 coronary patients with stable angina of effort. Peak magnitude of the effect was similar with both drugs, while the duration of the effect of isosorbide dinitrate (4.0 +/- 0.3 hrs) was significantly greater than that of molsidomine (3.4 +/- 0.3 hrs). Molsidomine reached its peak effect significantly earlier, as compared to isosorbide dinitrate. There was a significant correlation between the effectiveness of molsidomine and isosorbide dinitrate in the same patients.     

Nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate alone and in combination for patients with chronic stable angina: a double-blind crossover study

Since not all patients tolerate beta-blockers, the efficacy of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate was evaluated alone and in combination in patients with stable angina pectoris. The study was a randomized double-blind crossover design with patients titrated to maximally tolerated doses of both drugs. Phases included isosorbide dinitrate alone, nifedipine alone, and isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine in combination, with efficacy determined by stress testing. Eleven men and one woman patient with a mean age of 60 years and a mean of five anginal episodes/week completed the study. Patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes I, II, and III. With nifedipine alone compared with isosorbide dinitrate alone, patients had fewer angina attacks/week (p less than 0.02), exercised longer before experiencing angina (p less than 0.03), and had less ST segment depression during (p less than 0.03) or after (p less than 0.05) exercise. When patients received isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine, only time to onset of angina during exercise (p less than 0.05) was significantly different from the response with isosorbide dinitrate alone. Analysis of variance between nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine was not significant. Diastolic blood pressure with isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine (p less than 0.04) was lower than with isosorbide dinitrate alone. No significant differences in systolic blood pressure were noted between the treatment groups. The drugs alone and in combination were relatively well tolerated. Nifedipine alone may be superior to isosorbide dinitrate alone. The combination of isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine demonstrated no advantage over nifedipine alone compared with isosorbide dinitrate alone.     

Oral Isosorbide dinitrate in angina pectoris: Comparison of duration of action and dose-response relation during acute and sustained therapy

The effects of different oral doses of isosorbide dinitrate administered acutely and four times daily during sustained therapy were studied in 12 patients with angina pectoris. After administration of 30, 60 and 120 mg of isosorbide dinitrate, the average plasma concentrations were higher and the area under the plasma concentration time curve was greater during sustained than during acute therapy (p < 0.01). Reduction in standing systolic blood pressure was greater during acute than during sustained therapy (p < 0.001). This reduction in systolic blood pressure was dose-related and persisted for 8 hours during acute therapy, but was not dose-related and was demonstrable for only 4 hours during sustained therapy. Compared with placebo therapy, exercise duration to the onset of angina and to the development of moderate angina increased significantly after each dose of isosorbide dinitrate for 8 hours during acute therapy but for only 2 hours during sustained therapy. During acute therapy, administration of a single dose of 15 or 30 mg of isosorbide dinitrate produced similar improvement in exercise tolerance as did a dose of 60 or 120 mg. During sustained therapy (15 mg four times daily), exercise tolerance increased to the same magnitude as with doses of 30, 60 or 120 mg four times daily. In most patients, near maximal improvement in exercise tolerance occurred after a dose of 15 or 30 mg four times daily.It is concluded that during sustained therapy with isosorbide dinitrate, partial tolerance to the antianginal and circulatory effects develops rapidly.     

Comparative effects of theophylline and isosorbide dinitrate on exercise capacity in stable angina pectoris, and their mechanisms of action

While the role of nitrates in the prevention and treatment of myocardial ischemia is well established, the use of theophylline, proposed almost a century ago, is still controversial. Also controversial is its mechanism of action, initially thought to be coronary dilation. In this randomized, single-blind study, the acute effects on exercise capacity of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate (10 mg) and of intravenous theophylline ethylenediamine (7 mg/kg) were assessed in 10 patients with chronic stable angina and positive exercise test. After the administration of theophylline, the time to onset of angina, the heart rate-blood pressure product at 1-mm ST-segment depression and the exercise duration were similar to that after isosorbide dinitrate administration (9.8 +/- 2.3 vs 9.3 +/- 1.7 minutes, 207 +/- 41 vs 207 +/- 48 beats/min.mm Hg.10(-2) and 10.8 +/- 2 vs 10.4 +/- 2 minutes, respectively). Both drugs significantly (p less than 0.001) improved all these parameters compared to the baseline exercise test. The effect of the 2 drugs on the diameters of angiographically normal segments of large epicardial coronary arteries was then assessed using computerized quantitative angiography in 10 other patients with stable angina. Whereas theophylline failed to increase the coronary diameters compared to that in the baseline angiogram (2.9 +/- 0.6 vs 2.9 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively), the subsequent administration of isosorbide dinitrate resulted in an increase up to 3.2 +/- 0.7 mm (p less than 0.02). Thus, in patients with stable angina, theophylline delays the onset of angina, increases the ischemic threshold and prolongs the exercise duration to the same degree as isosorbide dinitrate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Importance of coronary collateral circulation for increased treadmill exercise capacity by nitrates in patients with stable effort angina pectoris

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the mechanism that induces an improvement in exercise capacity by nitrates in patients with stable effort angina pectoris. The study population was composed of 19 patients: group A, 10 patients with chronic stable effort angina who had a well-developed coronary collateral circulation to the potentially ischemic region; group B, 9 patients with chronic stable effort angina who had no collateral circulation to the jeopardized myocardium. Treadmill exercise was performed according to the standard Bruce protocol with and without pretreatment with orally administered 10 mg isosorbide dinitrate. Percent increases (mean +/- SE) in exercise duration were not significantly different between groups A and B (25 +/- 6 vs. 14 +/- 6%). Percent increases in the maximal rate-pressure product tended to be greater in group A than in group B (27 +/- 6 vs. 10 +/- 6%). Percent increases in the rate-pressure product at the onset of angina pectoris were significantly greater in group A than in group B (37 +/- 7 vs. 7 +/- 6%; p less than 0.01). Percent increases in the rate-pressure product at 0.1 mV S-T segment depression were also significantly greater in group A than in group B (26 +/- 6 vs. 1 +/- 5%; p less than 0.01). These results suggest that isosorbide dinitrate dilates epicardial collateral vessels with smooth muscle layers, but fails to dilate the coronary arteries with significant organic stenoses.     

Selection of therapy with nitrates in patients with stable effort angina: results of comparative study of common isosorbide dinitrate and long acting preparation of isosorbide-5-mononitrate

AIM: To assess efficacy and tolerability of a novel drug form of isosorbide-5-mononitrate in patients with ischemic heart disease and stable effort angina as compared with common isosorbide dinitrate pills. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with stable class II-III effort angina (n=30) were included into a randomized crossover study in which they received isosorbide dinitrate (nitrosorbide, 10-20 mg t.i.d.) and long acting isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ephox-long, 50-100 mg o.d.) for 3 weeks each. Efficacy of treatment was assessed by clinical data and treadmill exercise tests. Questionnaires were used for registration of frequency and intensity of attacks of headache. RESULTS: The use of both isosorbide dinitrate and 5-mononitrate was associated with significant improvements of exercise tolerance however effect of mononitrate lasted longer. Nitroglycerine requirement diminished during first week of use of both drugs and remained on this level by the end of 3-rd week of treatment with mononitrate but substantially rose by the end of treatment with dinitrate. Number of attacks of headache increased during first week of treatment with both drugs, became even higher by the end of use of dinitrate and decreased by the end of use of mononitrate. CONCLUSION: Long acting form of isosorbide-5-mononitrate ephox-long taken once daily provides sufficient antianginal effect throughout a day and is better tolerated than nitrosorbide preparation of isosorbide dinitrate with moderately prolonged activity.     

Assessment of antianginal efficacy of long-acting sustained release isosorbide dinitrate in comparison with short-acting isosorbide dinitrate.

A quadruple blind randomized cross-over study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of twice a day long acting sustained release isosorbide dinitrate (SRISDN) in comparison with 4 times daily of the short acting isosorbide dinitrate in 18 patients with stable angina pectoris (NYHA class II-III) with a positive exercise treadmill test. The antianginal effect of sustained release isosorbide dinitrate (SRISDN) (exercise duration 472.61 +/- 112.49 sec and anginal episodes per week (1.33 +/- 1.18) was not significantly different (p less than 0.05) when compared to conventional isosorbide dinitrate (exercise duration 468.33 +/- 135.28 sec and anginal episodes per week 1.55 +/- 104). Twice a day long acting sustained release isosorbide dinitrate is as effective as four times a day conventional short acting isosorbide dinitrate. Such a regimen is likely to lead to a better patient compliance and ease of antianginal therapy.     

Differences in response to single dose and steady-state therapy with verapamil in stable angina.

Ten patients with stable effort angina were studied in a randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled trial to compare the antianginal efficacy of "acute" and "chronic" (after reaching a steady-state level) treatment with verapamil. Efficacy was assessed by exercise testing after a 120 mg single-dose and at the end of a seven-dose course of 120 mg of verapamil given thrice daily. Three daily exercise tests were performed the first, second and fifth day of the study protocol at 8, 12 and 16 hours. Eight hours after the last dose was given, exercise time increased by 54 +/- 30 sec after a single-dose of verapamil and by 156 +/- 31 sec after seven-doses of verapamil (P less than 0.05 as compared to single-dose verapamil). The time to 1 mm depression of the ST segment increased by 30 +/- 20 sec after a single-dose of verapamil and by 66 +/- 28 sec after seven-doses of verapamil (P less than 0.01 as compared to single dose verapamil). Six of the ten patients became free from angina on treadmill exercise after a seven-dose course of verapamil, but only one patient became free from angina after acute testing with a single-dose of verapamil. It is concluded that several doses of verapamil are required to achieve an optimal anti-ischemic effect, as suggested by the pharmacodynamic properties of this drug. Once steady-state is achieved, the effects of verapamil remain for at least 8 hours, so that an administration schedule of three times daily protects the patient for a 24-hour period.     

Evaluation of a new percutaneous nitroglycerin preparation in effort angina

In 10 subjects with constant threshold effort angina ascertained by two bicycle exercise tests, the efficacy of a new transdermal preparation of nitroglycerin (104 mg) applied once daily was evaluated and compared to that of oral long-acting isosorbide dinitrate (20 mg every 8 hours). The two drugs were administered according to a complete crossover plan. The effectiveness of each drug was evaluated by testing the patients before treatment, on the third and on the twenty-first hour of treatment. In each case the exercise was continued until electrocardiographic signs of ischemia appeared. The total work during treatment with transdermal nitroglycerin was significantly higher (average increase greater than 44%) than without the drug (1311 +/- 545 Kgm before treatment, 2145 +/- 968 Kgm at the third hour, 1899 +/- 657 Kgm at the twenty-first hour of treatment). Similar results were obtained during treatment with isosorbide dinitrate (1332 +/- 581 Kgm before treatment, 1837 +/- 526 at the third hour, 1869 +/- 570 at the twenty-first hour of treatment; average work increase greater than 37%). In conclusion, with this new transdermal preparation of nitroglycerin an increased work-load can be achieved before ischemia appears. Its beneficial action remains constant for 21 hours.     

Comparison of the antianginal efficacy of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) 40 mg and verapamil 120 mg three times daily in the acute trial and following two-week treatment

Fourteen male patients with exertion-related angina pectorisand reproducible ST-segment depression on stress testing wereeach treated with isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) 40 mg three timesdaily, verapamil 120 mg three times daily and placebo threetimes daily for two weeks according to a double-blind cross-overprotocol. The mean improvement of exercise-induced ST-segment depressionamounted to 73% on the first day of ISDN treatment (P < 0.001)and to 54% following acute administration of verapamil (P <0.001). On the last day of continuous treatment, the antianginalefficacy of ISDN was somewhat mitigated (reduction of ST-segmentdepression: 54%; P<0.001), while the effect of verapamilremained unchanged (55%, P<0.001). The double product (heartrate x systolic blood pressure) at the end of stress testingdecreased most pronouncedly on day 1 of ISDN treatment ( - 21%;P<0.01). On chronic testing, both drugs similarly influencedthis parameter: 10–11% (P<0.05). The mean global ejectionfraction (EF) assessed by gated blood pool scintigraphy on day13 showed a stress-induced fall from 49 to 44% (P<0.05) afterthe administration of placebo. The respective values with ISDNwere 53% at rest and 52% on exercise (n.s.), and after givingverapamil 50% and47% (n.s.). Thus, ISDN 40 mg and verapamil 120 mg displayed beneficial anti-ischaemiceffects in patients with stable exertion-related angina pectorisafter acute and chronic administration. The efficacy of ISDNdeclined somewhat in the course of the two-week treatment, whereasthat of verapamil remained unchanged. Beneficial effects ofboth drugs were also demonstrated with regard to the rate pressureproduct. Isosorbide dinitrate 40 mg and verapamil 120 mg administeredthree times daily can be recommended for the acute and chronictherapy of patients with stable angina.     

Randomized double-blind comparison of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate in patients with coronary arterial spasm

The effects of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate on the frequency of angina and consumption of nitroglycerin were studied in 19 patients with coronary arterial spasm. After a lead-in phase, the patients were randomized to treatment with either nifedipine or isosorbide dinitrate. After dose titration (40 to 120 mg/day) and evaluation, they were given the alternate therapy. During the initial segment of the double-blind phase, one patient died suddenly (nifedipine phase), one dropped out of the study (nifedpine phase) and another was unable to tolerate therapy (isosorbide dinitrate phase). In the other 16 patients, the mean frequency of angina was less during therapy with both nifedipine (0.69 episode/day, p < 0.05) and isosorbide dinitrate (0.77 episode/day, p < 0.05) phases than during the lead-in phase (1.71 episodes/day). The mean frequency of angina was similar in the nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate phases. A 50 percent or greater decrease in frequency of angina compared with lead-in phase values occurred in 13 of 18 patients during treatment with nifedipine and in 10 of 16 during treatment with isosorbide dinitrate. Of the 16 patients who completed both double-blind phases, 7 showed greater improvement (that is, a 50 percent or greater decrease in frequency of angina) with nifedipine than with isosorbide dinitrate); 6 others showed greater improvement with isosorbide dinitrate, and the other 3 had a less than 50 percent difference in frequency of angina with the two drugs. These findings in a limited number of patients suggest that both nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate are effective in certain patients with coronary spasm but that neither drug is clearly superior.     

Comparison of the antianginal effectiveness of nifedipine, verapamil, and isosorbide dinitrate in patients receiving propranolol: a double-blind study

Ten men with stable angina not fully relieved by optimal doses of propranolol were given on each of four mornings a single dose of 10 mg nifedipine, 120 mg verapamil, isosorbide dinitrate (5 to 30 mg, previously titrated to lower systolic blood pressure by 15 to 20 mm Hg), or placebo, in double-blind fashion. Bicycle exercise to angina was performed hourly for 8 hr thereafter. All three vasodilators increased exercise time by at least 50% by the first hour (p less than .001), with a gradually diminishing effect persisting for 6 to 8 hr (p less than .01). Although for the group there were no differences in magnitude and duration of effect among the three drugs, in five of the individual patients there were important differences in response favoring one or another vasodilator. We conclude that nifedipine, verapamil, and isosorbide dinitrate are equally effective and reasonably long-acting antianginal supplements to propranolol, although some patients may benefit more from one than another of the three.     

Effects of diltiazem alone or with isosorbide dinitrate or with atenolol both acutely and chronically for stable angina pectoris

To establish the contribution of combination therapy in stable angina, the short- and long-term effects of diltiazem (120 mg and 360 mg/day, respectively), and the additive effects of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate, 10 mg, and atenolol, 100 mg, were studied in 11 patients with chronic stable angina using an open-label sequential design. All patients underwent exercise testing without therapy, and with each drug and their combinations. Exercise time and heart rate-blood pressure product were measured at 1-mm ST-segment depression, or at peak exercise if the test result was negative. Exercise time increased from a control value of 8.0 +/- 2.3 minutes (mean +/- standard deviation) to 11.4 +/- 2.4 minutes (p less than 0.0001) after the administration of isosorbide dinitrate, to 11.3 +/- 1.8 minutes (p less than 0.001) after short-term diltiazem and to 12.4 +/- 1.5 minutes (p less than 0.001) after long-term diltiazem. The rate-pressure product increased from a control value of 19,070 +/- 3,564 to 24,431 +/- 4,795 beats/min X mm Hg (p less than 0.0001) after isosorbide dinitrate, to 22,287 +/- 4,753 beats/min X mm Hg (p less than 0.01) after short-term diltiazem and to 21,812 +/- 3,976 beats/min X mm Hg (p less than 0.007) after long-term diltiazem. The addition of atenolol to long-term diltiazem significantly reduced the rate-pressure product compared with long-term diltiazem alone (21,812 +/- 3,976 vs 13,926 +/- 2,880 beats/min X mm Hg, (p less than 0.002), although there was no further significant increase in exercise time (12.4 +/- 1.5 vs 13.3 +/- 1.6 minutes).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Beneficial effects of high-dose diltiazem in patients with persistent effort angina on beta-blockers and nitrates: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study

The effects of orally administered diltiazem combined with maximally tolerated doses of beta-blockers and nitrates were assessed in 12 patients, who during stress testing exhibited persistent effort angina and continued objective evidence for inducible myocardial ischemia. Patients performed multistage semisupine exercise on a bicycle ergometer during equilibrium-gated radionuclide angiography after consecutive 2 week treatment periods of placebo or diltiazem 90 mg qid (mean dose 340 mg/day) combined with maximally tolerated propranolol (mean dose 178 mg/day) and isosorbide dinitrate (mean dose 137 mg/day). All medications (including diltiazem or placebo) were administered four times daily for the duration of the study. Diltiazem or placebo was administered according to a double-blind design, with randomized cross-over at the end of each 2 week treatment period. The average number of angina attacks decreased during the double-blind cross-over phase of the trial (7 +/- 7 episodes/week at baseline vs 4 +/- 3 on placebo vs 2 +/- 2 on diltiazem; p = .08). Angina pectoris was abolished during peak exercise in eight of 12 patients on diltiazem (p less than .05 vs placebo). Diltiazem increased total exercise duration from 276 +/- 92 to 310 +/- 78 sec (p less than .005 vs baseline). Diltiazem likewise increased the time to onset of angina from 231 +/- 84 sec at baseline to 305 +/- 77 sec (p less than .005), as well as the time to the onset of 1 mm ischemic ST segment depression (p = .01). Diltiazem decreased heart rate at rest, during submaximal workload, and at peak exercise (p less than .05), and decreased systolic blood pressure at peak exercise only (p less than .05). A significant decline in rate-pressure product at submaximal and peak exercise was noted (p less than .05). At any given workload there was significantly less ST segment depression during submaximal (p = .05) and peak exercise (p less than .025).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Regional myocardial dysfunction in patients with angina at rest and response to isosorbide dinitrate assessed by phase analysis of radionuclide ventriculograms

Left and right ventricular synchrony was assessed in 15 patients with angina at rest but no previous infarction by phase analysis of equilibrium radionuclide ventriculograms. Transient thallium-201 perfusion defects were noted in all during angina at rest and coronary vasospasm was documented in nine of the patients. Radionuclide ventriculograms were performed at control, during the ischemic episodes and after intravenous isosorbide dinitrate. Left and right ventricular phase histograms were quantified by the standard deviation from the mean of the peak (SD). Left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 65 +/- 11% (mean +/- standard deviation) at control, decreased in all patients during angina at rest to 49 +/- 14% (p less than 0.01) and increased in all patients after isosorbide dinitrate to 66 +/- 12%. However, ejection fraction during ischemia was abnormal in only nine patients and changed in two by less than 5% from the control value. Regional wall motion abnormalities were noted in all patients during the ischemic episodes but resolved after isosorbide dinitrate administration. Control left ventricular SD was 14.5 +/- 4 degrees, increased in all patients to 22.8 +/- 5 degrees during angina at rest (p less than 0.01) and returned to control values after isosorbide dinitrate administration (14.2 +/- 4 degrees). In contrast, right ventricular SD did not significantly change during ischemia as compared with control and isosorbide dinitrate. It is concluded that in angina at rest, a normal left ventricular ejection fraction does not exclude severe regional dysfunction; separate left and right ventricular SD is a sensitive index in detecting transient left ventricular dysfunction, and relief of ischemia is associated with rapid normalization of regional left ventricular function.     

Effects of the association of Ca-antagonists with nitroderivatives or betablocking drugs in effort angina pectoris (author's transl)]

The effects of the association of calcium antagonists (CAI) with a nitroderivate and a betablocker were studied by means of exercise tests in 8 patients with stable effort angina pectoris. According the statistical model of a latin square 4 x 4, the first 4 patients were tested with the following treatments: placebo, oral; nifedipine (N) 10 mg, oral; N + isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) 10 mg oral; N + propranolol (Pr) 40 mg, oral. In the second square verapamil 80 mg oral represented the CAI treatment. Compared to placebo, all the treatments produced a significant increase of exercise duration and total work performed before angina. In both the squares the improvement observed after CAI + ISDN was significantly higher than after administration of CAI alone. In both the squares the association of CAI + Pr determined a little, non significant improvement of exercise duration in respect to CAI alone. EKG positivity was delayed by Pr more than angina appearance: hpwever, also this effect was not significant when compared with administration of CAI alone. By the analysis of the changes of heart rate, maximal arterial pressure, ejection time and triple product at the same level of work, a relevant inhibition of myocardial contractility with the adopted doses of CAI can be excluded; the effect of these drugs seems to be due mainly to a decrease of arterial pressure, and, when associated to ISDN, to decreases of arterial pressure and ejection time.     

硝酸异山梨酯联合环磷腺苷葡胺治疗老年心绞痛疗效分析

目的：观察硝酸异山梨酯联合环磷腺苷葡胺治疗老年心绞痛的疗效,并与单用硝酸异山梨酯组作对比分析。方法：120例诊断为心绞痛的老年冠心病患者被分为硝酸异山梨酯治疗组和硝酸异山梨酯联合环磷腺苷葡胺治疗组（联合用药组）,各60例,并依据心绞痛类型划分为稳定型心绞痛（SAP）和不稳定型心绞痛（UAP）亚组,用药后分别观察临床症状,心率,血压,心电等指标变化。结果：联合用药组的临床症状缓解率较硝酸异山梨酯组（SAP：92．3％比76．7％,UAP：90．9％比72．6％）更为明显（P〈0．05）;心电图改善率也较硝酸异山梨酯组（SAP：78．3％比62．5％,UAP：76．9％比61．6％）明显升高（P〈0．05）,住院时间明显缩短、再住院率降低（P均〈0．05）,但血压和心率与单用硝酸异山梨酯组无明显差别（P〉0．05）。结论：硝酸异山梨酯和环磷腺苷葡胺联用较单用硝酸异山梨酯组临床起效更快,有效率更高,是值得临床推荐应用的治疗方案。     

Long-term follow-up of verapamil and nitrate treatment for coronary artery spasm

Thirty-seven patients with coronary artery spasm and minor coronary atherosclerosis (34) or normal coronary arteries (3) were followed up long-term. All had angina at rest, 32 had nocturnal angina, and 13 had a positive exercise test with S-T elevation. Three had a previous subendocardial infarction; 10 had had serious arrhythmias, which caused syncope in 7. At last review, 21 months (range 1 to 61) after starting therapy, 27 patients continued on verapamil, 314 (120 to 600) mg/day; 4 who did not respond to verapamil were taking nifedipine, 58 (30 to 80) mg/day; and 16 were also taking isosorbide dinitrate, 41 (20 to 80) mg/day. Of the 31 patients on therapy, 21 were asymptomatic, 9 were improved (1 to 4 attacks/month), and 1 had an average of 8 anginal attacks/month; the remaining 6 had stopped therapy and 5 were asymptomatic a mean of 10 (3 to 18) months after stopping. The exercise test became negative in all 12 patients tested on therapy, although 3 required nitrates in addition to verapamil or nifedipine.In 26 supervised treatment withdrawals in the hospital, a mean of 15 (1 to 55) months on therapy, 10 developed angina in less than 48 hours. Angina recurred in all 6 unsupervised, patient-initiated withdrawals. Failure to stop smoking was positively associated with recurrence of angina on treatment withdrawal (p < 0.02).Long-term treatment of coronary artery spasm with verapamil or nifedipine together with isosorbide dinitrate was well tolerated and effectively relieved angina. No documented serious arrhythmias, syncopal episodes, myocardial infarction, or death occurred during follow-up.