Outcome of renal transplantation in children less than two years of age.

Twenty-two renal transplants were performed in 21 children less than two years of age at Children's Hospital. Fourteen were from living related donors and eight were from cadaveric donors. The five year patient and graft survivals of these recipients were compared to all other pediatric recipients between two and 18 years of age who received renal transplants over the same time period. Five year graft survival for recipients less than two years of age was 86% following living-related donor transplantation and 38% following cadaver donor transplantation. Older pediatric recipients aged between two and 18 years had a five year graft survival of 73% following living-related donor renal transplantation, which was similar to that for recipients less than two years of age. Although older cadaveric recipients had a comparable five year graft survival to younger recipients, at 42%, the patterns of graft loss were different. Graft failures in young recipients occurred within the first seven months post-transplant, whereas the older recipient's grafts failed more gradually. Actuarial five-year patient survival in recipients less than two years of age was 86% following living-related donor renal transplantation and 70% following cadaver-donor renal transplantation. Recipients less than two years of age had a poorer patient survival than older recipients following both living-related donor renal transplantation (P = 0.06) and cadaver-donor renal transplantation (P less than 0.05). These findings suggest that the graft survival of living-related donor renal transplantation in recipients less than two years of age is better than that of cadaver-donor renal transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Renal allograft rupture.

In the present material of 448 consecutive renal transplants the incidence of allograft rupture was 3.6%. Among 389 first transplants there were two ruptures in the living donor group (126 patients, 1.5%) and 12 ruptures in the cadaveric donor group (263 patients, 4.6%). Only one ruptured kidney (living donor) achieved long term function. Four patients with first graft rupture were retransplanted with early loss of the kidney in all, in two because of rupture. Two of these patients received a 3rd cadaveric graft, of which one is functioning well after two years. All ruptures occurred within three weeks after transplantation, 14 kidneys ruptured during the first week. The clinical course and the operative findings suggested that rejection was the cause of rupture in all cases. This was confirmed by light and immunofluorescent microscopy of specimens from 15 kidneys, while one kidney only demonstrated extensive intrarenal vessel thrombosis. It is concluded that renal allograft rupture signals a strong immunological response in the recipient with poor graft prognosis. The chance of a successful retransplantation is small.     

Renal allograft recipient immunomodulation by concomitant immunosuppression and donor-specific transfusions

The induction of immunologic unresponsiveness to improve renal allograft survival was attempted in 151 patients by the pretransplant administration of donor-specific whole blood or buffy coat in conjunction with continuous Aza immunosuppression. All donor-recipient combinations were at least one-haplotype disparate and 21 were two-haplotype disparate. Presensitization was present in ten patients and attempts at desensitization were uniformly unsuccessful. Of the 151 nonpresensitized patients, transient sensitization occurred in 3% and permanent sensitization in 7%. One hundred thirty-five of 140 nonsensitized patients underwent renal transplantation from the specific blood donor and 56% have never experienced a rejection episode. The allograft survival rate at 2 years (93%) and 7 years (87%) is significantly better (P less than .01) than our historical experience with one-haplotype living-related transplants at 2 years (68%) and 7 years (59%). The low rate of sensitization (7%) has permitted almost all patients to undergo eventual renal transplantation from the specific blood donor. This and the low rate of early rejection (2%) argue for a modification of the immunologic response, perhaps by clonal deletion, rather than a selecting-out process as the mechanism for improved allograft survival.     

Immunologic Prognostic Factors of Renal Allograft Survival

IntroductionSuccessful outcome of renal transplantation depends on various factors, of which immunologic is one of the most important. Accumulated experience of a single center, with the same surgical and immunological team contributes significantly to safe conclusions. Purpose of this study was the evaluation of potential factors, in particular immunologic, that influence renal allograft survival.Patients and MethodsDuring the period 1991–2013, 20,784 surgical operations have been performed in our Department of Surgery – Transplant Unit, of which 575 were renal transplantations. We examined donor and recipient demographic factors, immunologic characteristics along with patient and graft survival.ResultsRenal allograft was retrieved from living-related donor in 103 cases and in 472 from cadaveric donor. Donor age was 46.7 ± 18.5 years old and 49.9% (287) were male. Recipient age was 48 ± 12.3 years old and 402 were male. HLA histocompatibility was carefully matched resulting in 85.5% renal transplants with 2–4 HLA mismatches and 93.8% renal transplants with at least one HLA-DR. Renal graft survival the first, fifth and tenth year was 89%, 76%, and 67% and patient survival was respectively 95%, 89% and 83%. Statistical analysis revealed that only donor age influenced renal graft survival (P < .05). HLA mismatches were not correlated with graft survival (log rank P = .495), but identification of panel reactive antibodies (PRA) class I and class II post transplantation had a statistically significant impact on long term renal graft survival (log rank P < .001 and P = .021, accordingly).ConclusionsAnalysis of potential prognostic factor showed that only donor age was correlated with allograft survival. Development of PRA following renal transplantation influenced long term graft survival. Good HLA matching with at least one HLA DR resulted in excellent graft and patient survival.     

Clinical study of 18 pediatric cadaveric renal transplantations: organ sharing in pediatric renal transplantation after enforcement of the organ transplant law in Japan

Renal transplantation is considered to be the optimal replacement therapy for children with end-stage renal disease. However, the number of pediatric renal transplants in Japan is much lower than in the USA and/or Europe. Since October 1997, pediatric(< 15 years) recipients are given priority over adult recipients for organ sharing, only if one or two HLA-DR antigen(s) are matched between the recipient and pediatric(< 15 years) donor. However, the number of pediatric transplants is not increasing. One hundred and twenty-four pediatric renal transplantations were performed in Tokyo Women's Medical University between 1983 and 1999, of which 18(14.5%) were cadaveric transplants and the others (106, 85.5%) were living-related transplants. We examined 18 pediatric cadaveric renal transplantations. Seven patients received their graft from pediatric donors less than 15 years of age and 11 from adult donors. The mean age at transplantation was 13.2 years (range 4.5-18.7 years). Major etiologies of renal disease are hereditary renal disease(38.8%), chronic glomerulonephritis(33.3%), and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis[FSGS] (16.7%). Zero matches in HLA-DR locus were observed in 72.2%. Patient survival rate was 100%. Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years after transplantation were 83% and 64% successively. There was no significant difference between the graft survival of cadaveric and living-related transplantation at 1 and 5 years. All 5 patients who received their graft between 1994 and 1998 have maintained normal graft function. Causes of their graft loss were chronic rejection in 3, recurrence of FSGS in 2, primary non-function in 1, and graft thrombosis in 1. Donor age and HLA-DR mismatching did not affect the outcome. We propose that pediatric renal grafts should be provided to children with priority, regardless of their HLA-A, B and HLA-DR matching.     

The selective use of antilymphocyte serum for cyclosporine treated patients with renal allograft dysfunction.

Eighty-seven adult renal allograft recipients were initially treated with cyclosporine-prednisone immunosuppression. Thirty patients experienced no episode of rejection. Antilymphocyte antibody therapy (ALS) was administered to 21 of the 68 recipients of cadaveric donor allografts for either primary allograft dysfunction or acute rejection, and to 6 of 19 recipients of haploidentical, living-related allografts because of steroid-resistant rejection. The cumulative allograft and patient survival for the entire series (follow-up 9-36 months) was 84% and 95%, respectively. This improvement in the rate of successful transplantation can be attributed to the selective addition of ALS therapy to recipients with specific instances of renal allograft dysfunction. In this report, the indications for the use of ALS preparations following prophylactic CsA immunosuppression are reviewed. Experience with the protocols of the ALS administration is also discussed. In selected cases, the administration of either ATG or OKT3 can significantly benefit CsA recipients who experience either primary allograft nonfunction or an epidose of acute rejection.     

The history and activities of transplantation in Turkey

The cornerstone events of transplantation history in Turkey are summarized herein. In 1975, we performed the first living-related renal transplant in Turkey. This was followed in 1978, by the first deceased donor kidney transplantation, using an organ supplied by Eurotransplant. In 1979 the law on harvesting, storage, grafting, and transplantation of organs and tissues was enacted; later that year, the first local deceased donor kidney transplantation was performed by our team. In 1988, another groundbreaking event in Turkey was successfully achieved; the first cadaveric liver transplantation; and in 1990, the first pediatric living-related segmental liver transplantation in Turkey and in the region by our team. One month later, an adult-to-adult living-related liver transplantation was successfully performed. Until now, we have performed 1506 kidney and since 1988, 121 liver transplantations. During 29 years of solid organ transplantation history in Turkey, 6686 kidney transplants have been performed nationwide in 28 different centers; 696 livers; 13278 corneas; 2883 bone marrow; 132 hearts; and 15 pancreas transplants. In 2001, the health ministry established the National Coordination Center as an umbrella organization to promote transplantation activities, especially for deceased donor organ procurement. Transplantation activities are accelerating day by day all around the country, but deceased donors are still far below the desired rates. Improvements in the fields of education and coordination should increase the quality and the quantity of transplantation activities.     

Successful Renal Transplantation in Children With Posterior Urethral Valves

PurposeThe treatment of children with posterior urethral valve (PUV) and end-stage renal disease can be challenging. Some series have had poor outcomes after renal transplantation with an increased risk of graft dysfunction and urinary tract infections. We present our experience with a pediatric population and compare it to all the other pediatric renal transplants done at our institution.Materials and MethodsWe identified 10 patients with PUV who underwent a total of 13 renal transplants between 1990 and 2000. The comparison group included 120 transplants done in 95 patients during the same period. Cumulative allograft survival and function were recorded.ResultsOverall patient survival in the PUV group was 100%. Mean age at transplant in the PUV group was 10.0 years and mean followup was 3.9 years. Six patients underwent high proximal urinary tract diversion, while the remainder had primary transurethral valve ablation. Three patients had bladder augmentation before transplantation. Cumulative allograft survival in the PUV group at 1 and 5 years was 85% and 64%, respectively. Of the 10 patients 9 currently have functioning living related donor transplants. One patient lost 3 cadaveric donor transplants to chronic rejection. No patients lost grafts due to infection or bladder dysfunction. Mean serum creatinine of the functioning grafts was 1.1 mg/dl.ConclusionsRenal transplantation can be performed safely and effectively in patients with PUV, including those who have undergone previous proximal urinary tract diversion. Preoperative bladder management and continued monitoring of bladder and kidney function postoperatively are paramount in the preservation of allograft function.     

Cholesterol embolization in renal allografts

Renal cholesterol embolization (RCE) in native kidneys has a dismal outcome and frequently leads to irreversible renal failure. RCE may rarely occur in renal allografts as well, particularly if the recipient or the donor has prominent atherosclerosis. The natural history of RCE in renal transplants is unknown. We have reviewed the surgical pathology files of The Johns Hopkins Hospital in the 14-year period between 1984 and early 1999 and found 7 RCE cases among 1500 renal transplant biopsies (0.47%). One of the seven cases had three biopsies showing cholesterol emboli, the first of which was a postreperfusion (immediate posttransplant) biopsy. The probable source of the cholesterol emboli was the recipient in six cases and the donor in one case. Five donors were cadaveric and two were living donors. Six biopsies were taken within the first 4 months posttransplant (four were postreperfusion biopsies). One recent patient had the inciting event of arteriography and stent placement 2 years posttransplant and is currently doing well. One kidney failed due to posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), another kidney failed with complicating opportunistic infections, and the other five were functioning 2 to 6 years posttransplant. A literature review revealed additional 14 RCE cases in renal transplants. Combining our cases with those in the literature (21 cases), reveals that the origin of the RCE was probably the recipient in 11 cases (seven cadaveric, two living-related, and two unknown), and the donor in 10 cases (eight cadaveric and two unknown). Graft failure occurred in two of the 11 cases, where RCE was of probable recipient origin. Seven of the 10 kidneys, where the RCE was probably of donor origin, failed due to allograft dysfunction; one of them also developed superimposed rejection and cytomegalovirus infection. We conclude that if RCE is originating in the recipient, graft survival is usually good. In contrast, if RCE is of donor origin, graft dysfunction and subsequent graft loss are common. The reason for this difference may be the more extensive RCE developing in an atherosclerotic cadaveric donor during organ procurement or severe trauma leading to death.     

Renal transplantation done safely without prior chronic dialysis therapy

The complications, cost, and inconvenience associated with pretransplant hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis would be minimized if transplantation were instituted without prior dialysis. That preuremic transplantation is safe and efficacious in patients with immanent end-stage renal disease has not been established. All 1742 consecutive primary renal transplants performed at the University of Minnesota during the 16.5 year period from January 1968 through July 1984 were reviewed to determine whether graft and patient survival were adversely affected by transplantation prior to dialytic therapy. In the overall group of primary renal transplants, no differences in actuarial graft or patient survival were noted with or without prior dialysis. Likewise, outcome was not affected by the pretransplant dialysis status in recipients of allografts from HLA-identical mismatched living-related donors. However, in cadaveric transplantation graft function appeared to be adversely affected by transplantation prior to dialysis, with 52% vs. 66% two-year graft function for nondialyzed vs. chronically dialyzed recipients, respectively (P = 0.15). Patient survival was significantly (P = .04) decreased in the nondialyzed group, with 66% vs. 80% two-year survival in the chronic dialysis group. However, nearly all of the nondialyzed, cadaveric recipients were diabetic. The outcome of transplantation was found to be identical in these patients, as compared with chronically dialyzed diabetic recipients of cadaveric grafts. Thus, the apparent detrimental effect of predialytic transplantation in the cadaver group was due to the preponderance of diabetics in the nondialyzed group. Since July 1984, a single-armed therapeutic trial of combination therapy with azathioprine, prednisone, antilymphoblast globulin (ALG), and cyclosporine has been undertaken, Since that time, 36 primary graft recipients were transplanted prior to dialysis. Of these 36, 35 currently have a functioning graft. Thus, transplantation prior to chronic dialysis is safe irrespective of donor source, or choice of immunosuppressive agents.     

Outcomes of renal transplantation among patients with end-stage renal disease caused by lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND: Although the outcomes of renal transplantation among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) caused by lupus nephritis have generally been found to be comparable to those of patients with other causes of ESRD, some studies indicate that cadaveric graft failure is more common among these patients. However, most previous studies examined small numbers of patients and did not adjust for important confounding factors. METHODS: Graft failure and patient mortality after the first cadaveric renal transplantation were compared between 772 adults with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis and 32,644 adults with ESRD caused by other causes who received a transplant between 1987 and 1994 and were included in the United States Renal Data System. The median follow-up times were 4.9 and 5.0 years in the two groups, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to adjust the risks of graft failure and mortality for group differences in recipient and donor characteristics. Similar comparisons were performed between 390 adults with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis and 10,512 adults with ESRD caused by other causes after first living-related renal transplantation. RESULTS: In an unadjusted analysis, the risk of graft failure after first cadaveric transplant was slightly but significantly greater among patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis than among those with ESRD caused by other causes [hazard ratio (HR), 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1. 26, P = 0.04]. However, after adjustment for potential confounding factors, the risk of graft failure was not increased in patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.23, P = 0.28). Mortality after the first cadaveric transplantation did not differ between groups. The adjusted risks of graft failure (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.32, P = 0.62) and patient mortality (HR = 0. 69; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.05, P = 0.09) after the first living-related renal transplant were also not significantly higher among patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis. CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival after first cadaveric and first living-related renal transplants are similar in patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis and patients with ESRD from other causes.     

Successful renal allografts in recipients with crossmatch-positive, dithioerythritol-treated negative sera. Race, transplant history, and HLA-DR1 phenotype

Graft survival was examined in 15 renal allograft recipients from a group of 20 patients with IgM autolymphocytotoxic antibody that could be removed in a crossmatch assay using a reducing agent, dithioerythritol (DTE). The significant differences in this group of 20 patients compared with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients lacking autolymphocytotoxic antibodies included an increased frequency of black patients (P = 0.002), a lack of previous transplants (P = 0.003), and an increased frequency of the HLA-DR1 phenotype (P = 0.0001). Sex and the number of transfusions did not appear significant, whereas the cause of ESRD was primarily systemic lupus erythematosus. Fifteen of the 20 patients were transplanted against a positive donor crossmatch. Eleven were recipients of cadaveric kidneys, nine of which are still functioning for periods ranging from 0.5 to 40 months. Two fo the cadaveric recipients died with functional grafts. Four received living-related donor transplants, one of which was lost to acute rejection one month posttransplant, while the remaining three have survived 1.5, 9, and 21 months, respectively. Fourteen patients had immediate allograft function with no hyperacute rejection and only one case of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was found. In summary, a negative crossmatch using DTE-treated, autologous reactive recipient sera may identify a group of patients who can be transplanted with minimal concern for hyperacute rejection or ATN. In addition to cause of ESRD, race, transplant history, and HLA-DR phenotype may further define this group of transplant candidates having IgM autolymphocytotoxic antibody. Extrapolation of these conclusions to transplant candidates lacking autolymphocytotoxic antibodies is not warranted.     

A comparison of 2 protocols for living-related renal transplantation in children: donor-specific transfusions versus cyclosporine

We analyzed the results obtained with protocols for immunosuppression of pediatric recipients of haploidentical living-related renal transplants. In the donor-specific transfusion group transfusion of blood products obtained from the prospective organ donor was performed before transplantation, and at transplantation maintenance immunosuppression of azathioprine and prednisone was begun. In the cyclosporine group donor-specific transfusion was not used, and maintenance immuno-suppression of cyclosporine and azathioprine was begun 1 week before transplantation, with the addition of prednisone at transplantation. Of 24 donor-specific transfusion recipients 3 had circulating cytotoxic antibodies to the prospective donor for an incidence of 12%. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to 1-year actual patient and graft survival (100 and 89 versus 100 and 86%, respectively), 1-year mean serum creatinine level (1.1 versus 1.2 mg./dl.), rejection treatments per patient (2.5 versus 2.6) and total days hospitalized during year 1 after transplantation (27 versus 18), with donor-specific transfusion data presented first. Initial hospitalization was significantly shorter (10 versus 16 days, p less than 0.05) and the incidence of rejection crises within 3 months was significantly less (68 versus 94%, p less than 0.05) in the cyclosporine group. We believe that cyclosporine and azathioprine pre-treatment of pediatric recipients of haploidentical living-related renal transplants with the addition of prednisone at transplantation is preferable to a donor-specific transfusion protocol because there is no risk of recipient sensitization to the prospective donor, and patient and graft survival is not adversely affected.     

Survival of cadaveric renal allografts in Hispanic as compared with Caucasian recipients

Evaluation of allograft survival rates revealed a significantly better overall graft survival in Hispanic (n = 66) as compared with Caucasian (n = 38) recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants. There were no significant differences between the Hispanic and Caucasian cadaveric recipient groups in terms of patient survival, pretransplant transfusion status, immunosuppressive protocols, rejection therapy, mean age, or frequency of diabetes mellitus. Cadaveric donor ethnic origin (i.e., Caucasian or Hispanic) did not significantly alter graft survival rates in either recipient ethnic group. Although Caucasian patients with splenectomies had better cadaveric graft survival than Caucasian graft recipients without splenectomies (P = .02), splenectomy had no significant effect on the renal allograft survival rate in Hispanics. Other factors that were evaluated and found not to correlate significantly with cadaveric graft survival rates were donor recipient HLA matching (A, B, or DR), and panel reactivities of recipient pregraft serum samples. In contrast to the superior cadaveric renal allograft survival in Hispanic as compared with Caucasian recipients, 1-haplotype-matched or 2-haplotype-matched living-related renal allografts had comparable graft survival rates in Caucasian and Hispanic recipients. These results indicate that Hispanics without splenectomy enjoy a cadaveric renal allograft survival rate superior to nonsegregated populations (treated with conventional immunosuppression) reported elsewhere.     

Primary hyperoxaluria: Simultaneous combined liver and kidney transplantation from a living related donor

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare inherited metabolic disorder in which deficiency of the liver enzyme AGT leads to renal failure and systemic oxalosis. Timely, combined cadaveric liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) is recommended for end-stage renal failure (ESRF) caused by PH1; however, the shortage of cadaveric organs has generated enthusiasm for living-related transplantation in years. Recently, successful sequential LKT from the same living donor has been reported in a child with PH1. We present a sister-to-brother simultaneous LKT in a pediatric patient who suffered from PH1 with ESRF. Twelve months after transplantation, his daily urine oxalate excretion was decreased from 160 mg to 19.5 mg with normal liver and renal allograft functions. In addition to the well-known advantages of living organ transplantation, simultaneous LKT may facilitate early postoperative hemodynamic stability and may induce immunotolerance and allow for low-dose immunosuppression. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:433-436.)     

Surgeon Scientist

The origins and development of the renal transplant program at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital (now the Brigham and Women's Hospital) from the late 1940s to the present are reviewed. The program was initiated as a effort to understand hypertension as a cause of renal failure. The initial transplants were unmodified allogeneic grafts placed in the thigh, followed by extensive laboratory experiments on dogs. This research culminated with the first successful human transplant of a kidney between identical twins in 1954. In 1959 the first successful fraternal allogeneic graft was accomplished as part of a protocol utilizing total body irradiation and bone marrow replacement. Finally, with the development of immunosuppressive drugs, we were able to transplant a cadaveric kidney successfully in 1962. This was a major impetus in the study of organ transplantation worldwide, which currently involves kidneys, liver, heart, pancreas, heart/lung, and bone marrow.     

Relationship of B cell alloantibodies to renal allograft survival.

To define the relationship of donor-specific B lymphocyte alloantibodies to renal allograft survival, longitudinal serum samples obtained pre- and post-transplantation were examined for antibodies cytotoxic to donor B lymphocytes. Ten of 17 renal allograft recipients had antibodies to donor B lymphocytes but not T lymphocytes either pre- and/or post-transplantation. Three patients underwent successful transplants despite preformed B cell antibodies; however, seven who developed B cell antibodies only after transplantation are either undergoing chronic rejection (4) or have had severe rejection crisis (3). Seven patients with no B cell antibodies have functioning grafts. In all cases, B cell antibodies were detected before biochemical and clinical evidence of rejection. Similar findings were noted when sera of 38 renal transplant recipients were examined for B cell antibodies cytotoxic to an unrelated panel of B lymphocytes. These results demonstrate that the development of B cell alloantibodies after transplantation is often associated with rejection and that successful renal transplantation can be performed across a positive B cell crossmatch.     

Functional capacity and rehabilitation of recipients with a functioning renal allograft for ten years or more

Forty-nine renal transplant recipients who had a single functioning allograft for ten or more years are reviewed. There were 17 cadaver recipients and 32 living-related recipients. Most patients have enjoyed excellent long-term renal function with stable mean daily dosages of azathioprine and prednisone. Fifty-three percent of patients never experienced a rejection episode, and 24% of patients experienced only one rejection episode. Five recipients (10%) developed malignancy following transplantation. Based on the Karnofsky activity scale, 80% of patients enjoyed unrestricted activity at ten years posttransplant. The two major factors contributing to declining activity were progression of systemic diseases such as atherosclerosis or diabetes, and declining allograft function. Following transplantation, all patients developed renewed interest in sexual activity, all men were potent, and all women experienced regular menses. Nine men achieved fatherhood and five women underwent successful pregnancy. Currently, 46 recipients are alive with a functioning allograft. These data confirm the ability of recipients with a long-term functioning renal allograft to return to the work force, participate in preillness levels of activity, and enjoy sexual activity and parenthood.     

Transplantation Outcomes in Primary Hyperoxaluria

Optimal transplantation strategies are uncertain in primary hyperoxaluria (PH) due to potential for recurrent oxalosis. Outcomes of different transplantation approaches were compared using life‐table methods to determine kidney graft survival among 203 patients in the International Primary Hyperoxaluria Registry. From 1976–2009, 84 kidney alone (K) and combined kidney and liver (K + L) transplants were performed in 58 patients. Among 58 first kidney transplants (32 K, 26 K + L), 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year kidney graft survival was 82%, 68% and 49%. Renal graft loss occurred in 26 first transplants due to oxalosis in ten, chronic allograft nephropathy in six, rejection in five and other causes in five. Delay in PH diagnosis until after transplant favored early graft loss (p = 0.07). K + L had better kidney graft outcomes than K with death‐censored graft survival 95% versus 56% at 3 years (p = 0.011). Among 29 year 2000–09 first transplants (24 K + L), 84% were functioning at 3 years compared to 55% of earlier transplants (p = 0.05). At 6.8 years after transplantation, 46 of 58 patients are living (43 with functioning grafts). Outcomes of transplantation in PH have improved over time, with recent K + L transplantation highly successful. Recurrent oxalosis accounted for a minority of kidney graft losses.     

Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates

An increasing number of cadaveric kidney transplants are now performed with organs from donors who would have been deemed unsuitable in earlier times. Although good allograft outcomes have been obtained with these marginal donor transplants, it is unclear whether recipients of marginal kidney transplants achieve a reduction in long-term mortality as do recipients of "ideal" kidneys. Patients with end-stage renal disease registered on the cadaveric renal transplant waiting list between January 1, 1992, and June 30, 1997, were studied for mortality risks according to three outcomes: wait-listed on dialysis treatment with no transplant (WLD); transplantation with marginal donor kidney (MDK); and "ideal" or optimal donor kidney transplantation (IDK). Thirty-four percent of wait-list registrants had received a cadaveric kidney transplant by June 30, 1998. Of these, 18% received a marginal kidney that had one or more of the following pretransplant factors: donor age >55 yr, non-heartbeating donor, cold ischemia time >36 h, and donor hypertension or diabetes mellitus of > 10 yr duration. Five-year graft and patient survival was 53% and 74% for MDK recipients compared with 67% (P< 0.001) and 80% (P< 0.001) for IDK recipients. Adjusted annual death rate and estimated remaining life time was 6.3%, 4.7%, and 3.3% and 15.3 yr, 20.4 yr, and 28.7 yr for WLD, MDK, and IDK groups, respectively. The average increase in life expectancy for MDK recipients compared with the WLD cohort was 5 yr, although this benefit varied from 3 to 10 yr depending on the recipient's characteristics. It is concluded that transplantation of a marginal kidney is associated with a significant survival benefit when compared with maintenance dialysis.