Bacterial infection profile and predictors among patients admitted to a burn care center: A retrospective study

BackgroundInfection is the main cause of mortality and complications in burn patients. The present study was the first to examine the local profile and antecedents of bacterial infections among patients admitted to a Lebanese burn care center.MethodsThe present study was a retrospective analysis of the occurrence and recurrence of infection, its characteristics as well as antimicrobial susceptibility among 475 patients admitted to the Burn Centre at the Lebanese Geitaoui Hospital between January 2014 and December 2018.Results55% of patients contracted at least one infection during their hospitalization. Length of stay (LOS), sepsis, wound dressing under anesthesia, blood transfusion and female sex independently and positively predicted infection in burn patients. Infection was predominately caused by Staphylococcus aureus (48.7%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.6%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (15.7%). Bacterial isolates were predominately multi-drug or extensively drug resistant and showed variable antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Recurrent infections occurred in 44.1% of infected burn patients, and were independently predicted by LOS (p = 0.004), sepsis (p = 0.001), surgery (p = 0.003), burn excision and skin grafting (p = 0.019), and central line insertion (p = 0.004).ConclusionExisting burn management and infection control measures must be revised in order to reduce the incidence and improve the treatment of infections in burn patients.     

A systematic review of intervention studies demonstrates the need to develop a minimum set of indicators to report the presence of burn wound infection

IntroductionBurn wound infections result in delayed healing and increased pain, scarring, sepsis risk and healthcare costs. Clinical decision making about burn wound infection should be supported by evidence syntheses. Validity of evidence from systematic reviews may be reduced if definitions of burn wound infectionvary between trials. This review aimed to determine whether burn wound infectionis defined, and whether there is variation in the indicators used to define burn wound infectionacross studies testing interventions for patients with burns.MethodSearches were carried out in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane Register of Trials) to identify studies evaluating interventions for patients with burns and reporting a burn wound infection outcome. Pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria were systematically applied to select relevant studies. Data were systematically extracted and reported narratively.Results2056 studies were identified, of which 72 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 71 unique datasets. 52.1% of studies were randomised controlled trials. Twenty-eight (38.0%) studies reporting a burn wound infection outcome did not report how they had defined it. In the methods of included studies, 59 studies (83.1%) reported that they planned to measure burn wound infection as an outcome. Of these, 44 studies (74.6%) described how they had defined burn wound infection; 6 studies (13.6%) reported use of a previously developed consensus-informed definition of burn wound infection, and 41 studies (69.5%) described the specific indicators used to define it. Studies used between one (11 studies; 26.8%) and nine indicators (2 studies; 4.9%) to define burn wound infection (median = 3, inter-quartile range = 2). The most commonly used indicator was presence of bacteria in the wound (61.0% of studies). Only 13 studies (31.7%) defined burn wound infection using the same indicators as at least one other study.Discussion and conclusionsWithin intervention studies reporting burn wound infection outcomes, a definition of this outcome is commonly not provided, or it varies between studies. This will prevent evidence synthesis to identify effective treatments for patients with burn injuries. Since there is no objective method for assessing burn wound infection, expert consensus is needed to agree a minimum set of indicators (Core Indicator Set) reported in all trials reporting burn wound infection as an outcome.     

Acetic acid dressings used to treat pseudomonas colonised burn wounds: A UK national survey

IntroductionWound infection following burn injury can be clinically challenging to manage. Its presence in a thermally compromised patient can detrimentally affect the ability of the wound to heal leading not only to wound progression but ultimately contribute to a large part of the economic health burden expenditure in the National Health Service. Despite meticulous wound care and infection control measures the colonisation of burn wounds by bacterial pathogens has and continues to be the case.There has been a growing interest in the use of antimicrobial applications when managing localised burn wound infections due to a constantly increasing number of antibiotic-resistant organisms.AimTo survey which antimicrobial dressings are currently being used across UK burns services when managing localised pseudomonas wound infections.MethodsWe conducted a nationwide telephone survey of UK burns services during October 2019 to determine which topical antimicrobial agent was used to treat local pseudomonas burn wound infections.ResultsSix burns services (31.6%) used acetic acid-soaked dressings, one of which alternates acetic acid with sodium hypochlorite solution. Silver-based dressings were also used by six burns services (31.6%) – again, one department alternates silver-based dressings with sodium hypochlorite solution. Betadine-soaked, gauze-based dressings were used across five burns services (26.3%) and the remaining two burns services (10.5%) used sodium hypochlorite solution and non-medicated dressings respectively.ConclusionWe identified a significant difference in the UK burns services’ approach to pseudomonas burn wound infections.Our literature review demonstrates that a daily dressing regime of 2.5–3% acetic acid is a well-tolerated treatment regime in burn patients and that it is in use in UK burns services. There are no current randomised controlled trials that evaluate the usage of acetic acid. The variation in usage suggests that there is scope for further study in order to develop evidence to generate a UK wide approach based on national standardised guidelines.     

Contribution of bacterial and viral infections to attributable mortality in patients with severe burns: An autopsy series

Bacterial infections are a common cause of mortality in burn patients and viral infections, notably herpes simplex virus (HSV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) have also been associated with mortality. This study is a retrospective review of all autopsy reports from patients with severe thermal burns treated at the US Army Institute of Research (USAISR) burn unit over 12 years. The review focused on those patients with death attributed to a bacterial or viral cause by autopsy report. Of 3751 admissions, 228 patients died with 97 undergoing autopsy. Death was attributed to bacteria for 27 patients and to virus for 5 patients. Bacterial pathogens associated with mortality included Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. This association with mortality was independent of % total body surface area burn, % full-thickness burn, inhalation injury, and day of death post-burn. Bloodstream infection was the most common cause of bacteria related death (50%), followed by pneumonia (44%) and wound infection (6%). Time to death following burn was ≤7 days in 30%, ≤14 days in 59% and ≤21 days in 67%. All of the viral infections associated with mortality involved the lower respiratory tract, HSV for 4 and CMV for 1. Four of these 5 patients had evidence of inhalation injury by bronchoscopy, all had facial and neck burns, and 2 had concomitant Staphylococcus pneumonia. Time to death following burn ranged from 14 to 42 days for the 5 patients. Despite advances in care, gram negative bacterial infections and infection with S. aureus remain the most common cause of bacteria related mortality early in the hospital course. Viral infections are also associated with mortality and numbers have remained stable when compared to data from prior years.     

Infection control in the burn unit

The survival rates for burn patients have improved substantially in the past few decades due to advances in modern medical care in specialized burn centers. Burn wound infections are one of the most important and potentially serious complications that occur in the acute period following injury. In addition to the nature and extent of the thermal injury influencing infections, the type and quantity of microorganisms that colonize the burn wound appear to influence the future risk of invasive wound infection. The focus of medical care needs to be to prevent infection. The value of infection prevention has been acknowledged in organized burn care since its establishment and is of crucial importance. This review focuses on modern aspects of the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention of burn wound infections and sepsis.     

Burn Wound Infections: Current Status

Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Even so, effective topical antimicrobial chemotherapy and early burn wound excision have significantly reduced the overall occurrence of invasive burn wound infections. Individual patients, usually those with extensive burns in whom wound closure is difficult to achieve, may still develop a variety of bacterial and nonbacterial burn wound infections. Consequently, the entirety of the burn wound must be examined on a daily basis by the attending surgeon. Any change in wound appearance, with or without associated clinical changes, should be evaluated by biopsy. Quantitative cultures of the biopsy sample may identify predominant organisms but are not useful for making the diagnosis of invasive burn wound infection. Histologic examination of the biopsy specimen, which permits staging the invasive process, is the only reliable means of differentiating wound colonization from invasive infection. Identification of the histologic changes characteristic of bacterial, fungal, and viral infections facilitates the selection of appropriate therapy. A diagnosis of invasive burn wound infection necessitates change of both local and systemic therapy and, in the case of bacterial and fungal infections, prompt surgical removal of the infected tissue. Even after the wounds of extensively burned patients have healed or been grafted, burn wound impetigo, commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus , may occur in the form of multifocal, small superficial abscesses that require surgical débridement. Current techniques of burn wound care have significantly reduced the incidence of invasive burn wound infection, altered the organisms causing the infections that do occur, increased the interval between injury and the onset of infection, reduced the mortality associated with infection, decreased the overall incidence of infection in burn patients, and increased burn patient survival.     

Experience of outreach in a resource-constrained environment: 10 years of outcomes in burn care

ObjectiveThe objective of this work was to describe an efficient and sustainable outreach model in a resource-constrained environment, with a multifaceted approach focusing on national policy change, telemedicine, injury prevention, education and treatment of burns.Summary background dataBurn injury constitutes a significant portion of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in children, and in low- and middle-income countries.MethodsWe reviewed the impact of ten-years of a burn outreach program. Our focus was on clinical data on burn care within one region of Ukraine. We assessed knowledge of burn prevention/first aid utilizing a large survey, analyzed clinical data from our outreach clinic and telemedicine program, and analyzed data within a newly created burn repository within Ukraine.ResultsA national burn prevention policy has been implemented through our efforts along with a burn prevention program. Educational efforts have led to improvements of major complication rates (wound infection [7% vs. 16%], pneumonia [2.4% vs. 0.3%], sepsis [1.6% vs. 0.6%], UTI [2% vs. 0.6%], and cellulitis [11% vs. 3.4%]), respiratory support of acutely ill patients [1.3% vs. 0.4%], and blood transfusion triggers.ConclusionsBroadly, our model could be an example of building sustainable outreach programs in resource-constrained environments. Through collaboration with local healthcare providers, we have developed and implemented an outreach program in a resource-constrained environment.     

Cost-drivers of medical expenses in burn care management

BackgroundProfound differences exist in the cost of burn care globally, thus we aim to investigate the affected factors and to delineate a strategy to improve the cost-effectiveness of burn management.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 66 patients suffering from acute burns was conducted from 2013 to 2015. The average age was 26.7 years old and TBSA was 42.1% (±25.9%). We compared the relationship between cost and clinical characteristics.ResultsThe estimated cost of acute burn care with the following formula (10,000 TWD) = −19.80 + (2.67 × percentage of TBSA) + (124.29 × status of inhalation injury) + (147.63 × status of bacteremia) + (130.32 × status of respiratory tract infection).ConclusionThe majority of the cost were associated with the use of antibiotics and burns care. Consequently, it is crucial to prevent nosocomial infection in order to promote healthcare quality and reduce in-hospital costs.     

Comparison of the efficacy of silver-based antimicrobial burn dressings in a porcine model of burn wounds

PurposeA variety of silver-based antimicrobial dressings are available on the market and are commonly used to prevent infection. Such prophylaxis is particularly important in treating burns, yet there is a paucity of evidence confirming the efficacy of commercially available dressingsin vivo. We describe here an in vivo porcine model of burns, which we use to test the antimicrobial efficacy of three common wound dressings and a control.ProceduresDomestic Yorkshire-cross pigs were medicated for pain management before inflicting burns with a heated brass rod. The wounds were artificially challenged with a mixture of two pathogens commonly associated with burn wound infection:Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The following dressing materials were sutured in place: gauze, nanocrystalline silver, silver-plated nylon, and polyethylene/polyester coated with high-oxidation silver salts. After 1 and 3 days, the wounds were assessed for erythema, swelling, and re-epithelialization, tissue was biopsied to determine the recovery of the challenge microorganisms, and histology was performed. We also examined the number of microorganisms present on the dressings themselves.ResultsHistology indicated that 30 s was sufficient to produce burns extending into the deep dermal layer. After 3 days, nanocrystalline silver and silver-plated nylon led to slightly reduced swelling relative to simple gauze, although none of the dressings significantly affected erythema or wound re-epithelialization. All the dressings led to decreased recovery of the challenge organisms from the burn tissue, relative to simple gauze. However, the magnitude of the reduction was greatest for nanocrystalline silver (log₁₀ reduction = 4–5); additionally, only nanocrystalline silver gave a statistically significant decrease (P = 0.02). Notably, the antimicrobial effect for all dressings was reduced by Day 3 relative to Day 1. Similar trends were observed for microbial retention on the dressings themselves.ConclusionNanocrystalline silver-based wound dressings generally outperformed silver-plated nylon and high-oxidation silver salts in thisin vivo model of burn wounds. Relative to prophylactic use, it may be advisable to change the dressings more frequently when treating an infected wound.     

Recurrent bacteremia: A 10-year retrospective study in combat-related burn casualties

IntroductionSurviving the first episode of bacteremia predisposes burn casualties to its recurrence. Herein, we investigate the incidence, mortality, bacteriology, and source of infection of recurrent bacteremia in military burn casualties admitted to the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center over a 10 year period.MethodsBacteremia was defined as the growth of Gram-positive or Gram-negative organisms in a blood culture that excluded probable skin contaminants. Recurrent bacteremia was defined as a subsequent episode of bacteremia ≥7 days after the first episode. Polymicrobial bacteremia was the presence of more than one pathogen in the same blood culture. Bacteremia was attributed to UTI, pneumonia, or wound sepsis. All other bacteremias were considered non-attributable bloodstream infections. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined factors predictive of clinical outcome.ResultsOut of 952 combat-related burn casualties screened, 166 cases were identified; 63% (non-recurrent) and 37% (recurrent) with median time to recurrence of 20 days. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the mortality rate was two and nine-fold, respectively, higher with recurrent bacteremia. Univariate analysis found that except for urinary tract infection, large burn size (>20%), 3rd degree burns, increased injuiry severity, perineal burns, and mechanical ventilator days were independent factors predictive of recurrence of bacteremia as well as increased mortality in the recurrent bacteremia cohort. Acinetobacter baumannii complex (63%) was prevalent in the non-recurrent group, while Klebsiella pneumoniae (46% vs. 30%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (35% vs. 26%) were prevalent in recurrent bacteremia. Half of the recurrent bacteremia cases were polymicrobial, compared to 9% in non-recurrent bacteremia. Pneumonia was prevalent in non-recurrent bacteremia (38%) and a combination of pneumonia and wound sepsis (29%) in recurrent bacteremia casualties.ConclusionsRecurrent bacteremia increases mortality in military burn casualties. Additional research is needed to address and mitigate the underlying causes, thereby improving survival.     

A 2000 patient retrospective assessment of a new strategy for burn wound management in view of infection prevention and treatment

Infections in burn patients are still the principal cause of complications in burn injuries. The aim of this study is to assess a new strategy for burn wound management in view of infection prevention and treatment in the experience of the Burn Treatment Center in Siemianowice Śląskie. The applied methodology involved the analysis of patient records describing the hospital''s epidemiological situation between 2014 and 2016. The analysis also included the use and cost of antibiotics, silver‐containing dressings, and other antiseptics relative to the number of sepsis cases, including those caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as the mortality ratio. The total costs of prevention and treatment of infections were reduced, while the use of silver‐containing dressings and antiseptics increased. The number of patients with sepsis decreased, including cases caused by P. aeruginosa, and the mortality ratio was reduced. Introducing a strategy for burn wound‐oriented infection prevention and treatment in burn patients provides a number of benefits. It is also cost‐effective. Using locally applied active dressings and antiseptics can be a welcome choice for often‐unnecessary antibiotic therapy of a suspected or existing burn wound infection.     

Child abuse and neglect in paediatric burns: The majority is caused by neglect and thus preventable

IntroductionIt is complex to distinguish negligent burns from inflicted and non-intentional burns, especially since no deliberate action caused the burn. Its recognition is important to create a safe life without (future) burns for our loved-ones who cannot take care of themselves (yet).Our aim was to investigate the incidence and associated characteristics of negligent burns are among children treated at a burn center.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical files of all children attending a Dutch burn center with an acute burn between January 2013–December 2015. The conclusion of the Child Abuse and Neglect team (CAN) was used to define inflicted, negligent or non-intentional burns. The remaining cases were reviewed by an expert panel using a standardized protocol. Demographic and social data as well as clinical information about the burn were collected.ResultsIn total 330 children were included. Negligent burns accounted for 56%, non-intentional for 42% and inflicted for 2% of the burns. Negligent burns were associated with: hot beverages (OR 4.40, 95%CI 2.75–7.05), a younger age (p < 0.001), occurrence at home (OR 4.87 95%CI 2.80–8.45) and were located at the anterior trunk (OR 2.75, 95%CI 1.73–4.35) and neck (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.12–3.50).ConclusionThis study shows that neglect is a major factor in the occurrence of burns in young children, therefore we conclude that the majority of paediatric burns are preventable. Educational programs creating awareness and focussing on prevention of these burns should be aimed at households, since the majority of negligent as cause of preventable burns occur at home.     

Burn prevention programs for children in developing countries require urgent attention: A targeted literature review

Background

Paediatric burns are a significant international public health problem. Developing and developed countries report similar challenges regarding paediatric burn prevention programs. Paediatric burns requiring healthcare often incur significant health and opportunity costs, death or long-term disability. This paper reviews international burn prevention strategies, and considers implementation of effective prevention strategies in South Africa.

Review question

Are there differences between developed and developing countries regarding causes and prevalence of paediatric burns, prevention strategies, and evidence of effectiveness?

Review framework

Implementing effective burn prevention strategies in South Africa.

Method

This systematic literature review identified, and narratively synthesized information from studies reporting population-based initiatives to prevent paediatric burns. Strategies from developing and developed countries were compared. Common strategies were identified, and evidence of effectiveness described.

Findings

30 studies were included from 16 developed/developing countries, reporting similar prevention strategies. Multi-pronged community-based interventions were most effective. Common elements comprised raising awareness of how burns occur, how burns can be prevented, the speed of sustaining significant injuries, and the short- and long-term effects of burns. Burn prevention strategies relevant to South Africa were provision of education in different formats (written, pictorial and verbal) in places frequented by children and parents, monitoring children more closely in hazardous areas (e.g. kitchens), and better planning of homes to reduce hazards.

Conclusion

More work is required to establish effective, sustainable community-wide prevention programs in developed and developing countries. Effective paediatric burn prevention programs for South Africa should acknowledge parent and child literacy, how and where information is best accessed, the need to adapt effective hazard reduction programs to informal settlements, and the importance of legislated minimum safe housing standards. This requires significant commitment from Government, communities and individuals.     

Institutional review of the implementation and use of a Clostridium difficile infection bundle and probiotics in adult trauma patients

Background

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common cause of healthcare associated infections contributing to morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of a CDI bundle along with probiotic utilization.

Retrospective outcomes analysis of tracheostomy in a paediatric burn population

IntroductionPrevious analyses of tracheostomy in paediatric burns was hindered by a lack of multi-institution or nationwide analysis. This study aims to explore the effects of tracheostomy in paediatric burn patients in such an analysis. De-identified data was obtained from the TriNetX Research Network database.MethodsTwo cohorts were identified using ICD and CPT codes: paediatric burn patients with tracheostomy (cohort 1) and paediatric burn patients without tracheostomy (cohort 2). Cohorts were matched according to age at diagnosis and pulmonary condition, specifically influenza and pneumonia, respiratory failure, acute upper respiratory infection, and pulmonary collapse. Cohorts were also matched for age at burn diagnosis and surface area burned. Several parameters including infection following a procedure, sepsis, volume depletion, respiratory disorders, laryngeal disorders, pneumonia, and other metrics were also compared.ResultsA total of 152 patients were matched according to age and pulmonary condition. Cohort 1 and cohort 2 had a mean age of 4.45 ± 4.06 and 4.39 ± 3.99 years, respectively. Matched patients with tracheostomy had a higher risk for pneumonia, respiratory failure, other respiratory disorders, diseases of the vocal cord and larynx, sepsis, volume depletion, pulmonary edema, and respiratory arrest. The risk ratios for these outcomes were 2.96, 3.5, 3.13, 3.9, 2.5, 2.5, 3.3, and not applicable. Analysis of longitudinal outcomes of paediatric burn patients with tracheostomy vs. those without demonstrated the tracheostomy cohort suffered much worse morbidity and experienced higher health burden across several metrics.ConclusionThe potential benefits of tracheostomy in paediatric burn patients should be weighed against these outcomes.     

Infections in patients with burn injuries receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

IntroductionExtracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) has only recently been described in patients with burn injuries. We report the incidence and type of infections in critically ill burn and non-burn patients receiving ECMO.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed on all patients at Brooke Army Medical Center who received ECMO between September 2012 and May 2018.Results78 patients underwent ECMO. Approximately half were men with a median age of 34 years with a median time on ECMO of 237 h (IQR 121–391). Compared to patients without burns (n = 58), patients with burns (n = 20) had no difference in time on ECMO, but had more overall infections (86 vs. 31 per 1000 days, p = 0.0002), respiratory infections (40 vs. 15 per 1000 days, p = 0.01), skin and soft tissue infections (21 vs. 5 per 1000 days, p = 0.02) and fungal infections (35% vs 10%, p = 0.02). Twenty percent of bacterial burn infections were due to drug resistant organisms.ConclusionThis is the first study to describe the incidence of infection in burn injury patients who are undergoing ECMO. We observed an increase in infections in burn patients on ECMO compared to non-burn patients. ECMO remains a viable option for critically ill patients with burn injuries.     

Amputations secondary to burn injuries in a resource-limited setting

IntroductionAmputations are a devastating consequence of severe burns. Amputations in a resource-limited setting are challenging as rehabilitation services available to these patients are inconsistent and often fragmented. Epileptic patients are a particularly vulnerable group when it comes to burn-injuries and often sustain deeper burns. The aim of this study is to analyse amputations secondary to burn injuries. We seek to identify vulnerable groups as a means for advocacy efforts to reduce the devastation of an amputation secondary to a burn injury. This paper highlights the burden of these injuries on the healthcare system and emphasizes the need for additional trained therapists for the rehabilitation of these patients.MethodsA retrospective database review was conducted. All burns admissions who underwent an amputation between 1 February 2016 and 31 January 2019 were considered.ResultsA total of 1575 patients were admitted during the study period. Fifty-four percent of the admissions were paediatric patients. The amputation rate in the paediatric population was 1.5% (13/850) while in the adult population it was 4.8% (35/724) . Most paediatric amputations were as a result of electrical injuries. Flame burns were most likely to result in amputations in the adult group and convulsions were the leading circumstance leading to the injury. There was no significant difference in sepsis or length of stay between the groups. There were no mortalities in the paediatric group but there was an 11% mortality rate in the adult group.ConclusionThe incidence of amputations in burns is low, however, it remains a devastating morbidity. Epileptics are a vulnerable group and these patients account for the most amputations among adult burns patients. Education interventions are needed regarding their diagnosis, administration of their medication and the importance of compliance. Advocacy efforts to ensure constant supply of anti-epileptic drugs at the clinics and other district level health facilities is also essential. Electrical injuries in children are not as common as hot water scalds, however, they are more likely to result in amputation. Communities need to be informed of the risk associated with illegal electrical connections and initiatives need to drive the safe provision of affordable electricity to these under-privileged, vulnerable communities.     

The relation between positive screening results and MRSA infections in burn patients

IntroductionMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a key pathogen in burn patients. Several factors put them at increased risk of MRSA infection: partial loss of the skin barrier, the immune-compromising effects of burns, prolonged hospital stays, and invasive procedures. This study aims to find the relation between MRSA screening swab cultures taken within 48 h of admission, weekly surveillance cultures, and MRSA infection secondary to colonization.MethodsThe data of all burns patients admitted to the referral centre for burns from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed. MRSA cultures taken at admission and on weekly surveillance screening, including nasal, perianal, and wound swabs, were reviewed. To determine associations between MRSA colonization and infection rates, both MRSA-positive and MRSA-negative swab cultures were included in the analysis. Several risk factors were considered: age, gender, ethnicity, %TBSA, BAUX index, inhalational injury, ICU admission and days, need for ventilator support and days, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, and complications. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to predict correlations between positive swab cultures and risk factors.ResultsData from 396 patients were reviewed. The median age at admission for the burn patients was 46 (IQR: 31–59) years. On admission, 2.5% of patients were MRSA positive, whereas 17.9% were found to be MRSA positive on weekly surveillance screening. At surveillance, 60.6% developed an infection secondary to MRSA colonization. An MRSA infection was not identified for any patient who did not have at least one positive admission or surveillance swab. A statistically significant association was found between any positive swab and MRSA infection (P < 0.001).The median number of complications reported in the MRSA-positive group was 2 (IQR: 1–3) versus 0 (IQR: 0–1) in the MRSA-negative group and the median length of hospital stay in the MRSA-positive group was 34.5 (IQR: 20.25–56.25) days versus 7 (IQR: 3–16) days in the MRSA-negative group (P < 0.001).ConclusionNosocomial MRSA colonization rates are high, and patients incurring infections experience a greater than average LOS in hospital and complications. Over 60% of patients who had a positive swab culture at surveillance developed an infection, whereas, no patient with a negative MRSA swab status developed an infection. Hence, pragmatic prevention strategies have to be implemented.     

Foot burns: A comparative analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic patients

IntroductionFoot burns represent a small part of the body with many challenges. The impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes adds further issues in management that clinicians must consider in their management. These factors have serious implications on morbidity and long term sequelae. Our aim is to analyse epidemiological trends of foot burns and examine the differences between diabetic and non-diabetics at Concord hospital from 2014 to 2019.MethodsA retrospective audit from 2014–19 at Concord General Repatriation Hospital Burns Unit summarised patient demographics, burn injury, diabetic status, operations and length of stay. All foot burn injuries from 2014–19 of all ages and gender that attended Concord burns hospital were included in this study.ResultsWe treated 797 patients who presented with foot burns, of which 16.2% were diabetic. The average age was higher in diabetics (60.72 years) than non-diabetics (39.72 years) and more males suffered burns compared to females in both groups (p < 0.001). There was a larger portion of elderly patients (greater than 65 years old, 15.1% of total) who sustained foot burns in the diabetic group compared to the non-diabetic group (p < 0.001). The most affected season was summer (27.0%), but diabetic patients were 1.7 times more likely to sustain injury in winter than non-diabetics. Diabetics were 3.8 times more likely to have contact burns compared to non-diabetic patients (p < 0.001). In a multivariable linear regression analysis, factors that contributed to increased length of stay included elderly status, place of event, diabetic status, number of operations, ICU admission, wound infection, amputation, and admission [F (16, 757 = 41.149, p < 0.001, R² = 0.465].ConclusionsWith the increase of diabetes, our multidisciplinary approach to diabetic foot care should include nursing, medical and surgical disciplines to identify patients at risk. The data highlights that a focus on prevention and education for diabetes is central to optimize glycaemic control and burn management, whilst providing a multidisciplinary network on discharge.     

An epidemiological profile and trend analysis of wound flora in burned children: 7 years' experience

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 5418 culture and sensitivity reports from 93 paediatric burn patients to determine profiles of wound flora and invasive organisms, trend analysis and patterns of antibiotic resistance. Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus was the predominant burn wound pathogenic isolate and the predominant invasive organism for burns less than 60 per cent BSA. Pseudomonads were the predominant invasive organism for burn wounds greater than or equal to 60 per cent BSA. Only 7 per cent of all pathogenic isolates were fungi. A significant association was demonstrated between increasing burn size and an increasing incidence of Gram-negative and invasive organisms. Silver sulphadiazine remains a very effective topical agent for the control of bacterial and fungal growth in burn wounds after 10 years of intensive use in this burn unit. Pseudomonad isolates were routinely multi-drug resistant. Pseudomonad isolates from wounds treated topically with a silver sulphadiazine-cerium nitrate mixture were frequently resistant to aminoglycosides, colistin and carbenicillin. It is concluded from this review that severe restrictions on antibiotic usage within burn units, and strict internal environmental control within burn units may help to decrease the incidence of nosocomial resistant strains and cross infection. Regular monitoring of burn wound flora, and the protocol for wound care used in treating these patients have been effective in preventing septic episodes and death due to sepsis.