Factors associated with response to high-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: The present study attempted to identify characteristics that correlated with clinical response to interleukin (IL)-2 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated laboratory and clinical characteristics of 374 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma treated with high-dose intravenous bolus IL-2 (720,000 IU/kg) from July 1, 1988, to December 31, 1999, at the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate was 15.5%. Pretreatment parameters such as patient demographics, laboratory values, and prior therapy did not correlate with response; however, 53.6% of patients with only subcutaneous and/or cutaneous metastases responded, compared with 12.4% of patients with disease at other sites (P2 =.000001). During therapy, patients who were responders tended to have received more doses during course 1 (16.2 +/- 0.3 doses v 14.5 +/- 0.2 doses; P2 =.0095); however, when limited to patients who were able to complete both cycles of course 1, there was no statistically significant difference (P2 =.27). Responders had a higher maximum lymphocyte count immediately after therapy compared with nonresponders (P2 =.0026). The development of abnormal thyroid function tests and vitiligo after therapy was associated with response (thyroid-stimulating hormone, P2 =.01; free T4, P2 =.0049; vitiligo, P2 < 10(-6)), although thyroid dysfunction may have been related more to the length of IL-2 therapy than to response. CONCLUSION: The presence of metastases only to subcutaneous and/or cutaneous sites, lymphocytosis immediately after treatment, and long-term immunologic side effects, especially vitiligo, were associated with antitumor response to IL-2 therapy.     

High-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma whose disease progressed after biochemotherapy

The objective of this study was to report our experience with 38 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma treated with high-dose (HD) bolus interleukin (IL)-2 after disease progression on or after biochemotherapy as the only earlier treatment for metastatic disease. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with metastatic melanoma treated with HD IL-2 at the Oncology Center of Hospital Sirio-Libanes between October 2000 and December 2009. The treatment consisted of IL-2, of 600,000 U/kg every 8 h for up to 14 doses, followed by 1-week rest and readmission for the second cycle. Responders received up to four additional cycles. Median follow-up was 9 months. The overall response rate was 23.6%, and we found no correlation between earlier response to biochemotherapy and response to HD IL-2. The median survival was 9.5 months for all patients and 36.1 months for the responders. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypotension, diarrhea, and respiratory distress, and one patient died from septic shock. We concluded that HD IL-2 has clinically meaningful antitumor activity in patients with metastatic melanoma whose disease has progressed after biochemotherapy. This is a treatment alternative in patients with no central nervous system involvement and who are fit enough to tolerate it, regardless of the initial response to biochemotherapy.     

Comparison of the efficacy of two different dosage dacarbazine-based regimens and two regimens without dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: a single-centre randomized four-arm study

The aim of this randomized four-arm phase III study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in activity between regimens containing dacarbazine and regimens without dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma, whether there is a dose-effect relationship for dacarbazine, and whether non-dacarbazine-containing aggressive regimens are in any way superior to non-aggressive ones. A total of 219 patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma were included in this study; 196 of them were evaluable for activity. The patients were randomized into four treatment arms: arm A (standard dose dacarbazine arm), vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, carmustine (BCNU) 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and dacarbazine 300 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 2-5; arm B (high-dose dacarbazine arm), vincristine and BCNU as in arm A and dacarbazine 600 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 2-5; arm C ('aggressive' regimen without dacarbazine), vindesine 3 mg/m2 on day 1, bleomycin 7 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 1-4, and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 5-8; arm D ('non-aggressive' regimen without dacarbazine), BCNU 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and procarbazine 90 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 1-10. The four arms were well balanced with regard to patient- and disease-related characteristics. On an intend-to-treat basis, the response rate was 11 out of 49 (22%) in arm A, nine out of 47 (19%) in arm B, 16 out of 63 (25%) in arm C and nine out of 60 (15%) in arm D. There was a large overlap between the 95% confidence intervals and no significant differences in the response rates between the four arms. Median survival in the four treatment arms was 4, 5, 6 and 4 months, respectively, again with no significant differences. Median survival for responders (8, 11, 10 and 13 months, respectively) in all four arms was significantly longer than in non-responders (4, 3, 5 and 4 months, respectively). Arms A, B and C were significantly more toxic compared with arm D, which was for all practical purposes devoid of toxicities. The efficacy of all four regimens thus appeared comparable both in terms of response rate and survival. Responders in all four arms achieved a survival benefit. There does not seem to be a dose-effect relationship for dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma. Chemotherapy from arm D, might be well suited for 'fragile' or elderly patients due to the lack of toxicity.     

A phase II study of high-dose continuous infusion interleukin-2 with lymphokine-activated killer cells in patients with metastatic melanoma

Thirty-three patients with metastatic melanoma were treated in a phase II study with an intravenous continuous infusion (IVCI) of interleukin-2 (IL2) given with lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells. The dose of IL2 was the optimal priming dose for LAK-cell induction, followed by the maximally tolerated LAK-cell dose that could be given by an IVCI schedule as determined by a previous phase I trial. The CI schedule was chosen for evaluation because of a postulated reduction in toxicity with the possibility of administering a more prolonged IL2 infusion and because greater rebound lymphocytosis and LAK-cell generation had been reported using this dose and schedule. The 33 patients were similar in age, performance status, and sites of disease to those treated in previous IL2 trials. All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. One patient (3%) achieved a partial response of 10 months duration. There were no other clinically significant responses. Significant toxicity included hypotension requiring pressors (45%), dyspnea (36%), renal insufficiency (24%), hepatic dysfunction (66%), and cardiac arrhythmias (18%). These toxicities reversed with cessation of the infusion. There were four deaths during the first 30 days of treatment, three from infection (one related to central line, one related to LAK cells, one related to tumor), and one from tumor-related hemorrhage. Toxicity was unexpectedly high and at least comparable to that seen in previous studies using a high-dose IV bolus schedule of IL2. When comparing the IVCI schedule with high-dose bolus IL2 to LAK cells in nonrandomized but sequential studies in patients with advanced melanoma, it appears that CI IL2 is less efficacious.     

Alternative temozolomide dosing regimens and novel combinations for the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma

Over the past 30 years, there has been no significant improvement in treatment outcomes for patients with advanced stage IV metastatic melanoma, and prognosis remains poor. Melanoma is known to be responsive to immunomodulatory agents, to be a highly vascular tumor, and to be fairly resistant to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Ongoing research is attempting to find novel combinations that may have therapeutic synergy. Alternative dose-dense schedules of temozolomide appear promising and are being actively investigated, based on their potential to overcome chemoresistance to alkylating agents and the proven activity of temozolomide in the brain. Outcomes of studies investigating single-agent temozolomide suggest that it has activity similar to single-agent dacarbazine. Other studies combining temozolomide with either interferon-alfa or thalidomide suggest that the addition of these immunomodulatory agents to temozolomide improves response rates and may improve overall survival. The best results have been achieved with the extended, daily, dose-dense temozolomide regimen. Further research is needed to determine the optimal temozolomide regimen and best combination approach for the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma.     

Sequential interferon-alpha2b, interleukin-2 and fotemustine for patients with metastatic melanoma

The aim of this study was the evaluation of both the antitumour activity and toxicity of an immunochemotherapeutic regimen consisting of interferon-alpha2b and interleukin-2 in combination with fotemustine for patients with metastatic melanoma. To improve the penetration of fotemustine into the brain, it was given immediately after immunotherapy, when the blood-brain barrier is still disturbed. Of the 19 patients treated, three complete remissions (CRs) and one partial remission (PR) were induced, giving an objective response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval 6-46%). The durations of the CRs were 9, 19 and 44 months; the PR lasted for 59+ months. The overall survival times for the patients with CR were 21, 25 and 70+ months, and 59+ months for the PR. For nine patients (47%, 95% confidence interval 24-71%) disease was stabilized for a median period of 8 months (range 2-18 months), resulting in a median survival of 18 months (range 10-41+ months). No haematological toxicity of World Health Organization grade 3 or more was observed and in general toxicity was low. In summary, this immunochemotherapy regimen led to long-term survival in occasional patients, and about half of the patients achieved stable disease, with prolonged treatment- and progression-free survival compared with nonresponding patients. The occurrence of brain metastases, however, was not prevented, and in fact was the site of recurrence in those patients achieving a CR. Due to its low toxicity, this protocol can be applied at a community hospital level.     

Alternating chemo-immunotherapy with temozolomide and low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma

Temozolomide is a rapidly absorbed chemotherapeutic agent, achieving significant central nervous system penetration. Previous clinical trials suggested that temozolomide in sequence with low-dose recombinant human interleukin-2 might be an efficacious and relatively non-toxic chemo-immunotherapeutic treatment, which may synergistically eliminate tumours. The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerance of temozolomide administered orally 200 mg/m days 1-5, in sequential combination with subcutaneous injections of 4.5x10 IU recombinant human interleukin-2 on days 8-11, 15-18 and 22-25 in patients with measurable, progressive metastatic malignant melanoma without radiological signs of central nervous system metastases. The secondary objectives were to determine tumour response and time to progression. Twenty-seven patients were included, of which four were non-evaluable for response. Twenty-three patients tolerated the regimen with side effects below grade 3 according to the World Health Organization (WHO) scale. Three patients suspended the treatment because of WHO grade 3 side effects already during the first 3 days of the first course of temozolomide. Seven patients showed no tumour progression during the first four treatment cycles. Two patients had complete responses, three partial responses and two stable disease at the end of the four cycles defined by the protocol and they continued the treatment until signs of relapse or a maximum of 21 courses. Five of these patients are still alive. Thrombocytopenia was significantly more pronounced in patients with objective response and stable disease than in non-responders to therapy. The median time to progression for all patients was 3.1 months and for responding and stable disease patients was 15 months. Five of 23 treated patients (22%) developed brain metastases during follow-up. Temozolomide in combination with recombinant human interleukin-2 is a well-tolerated regimen for outpatient treatment and the bio-chemotherapy combination induced durable clinical responses. Thrombocytopenia might be a positive predictive factor for response to therapy.     

Randomized study of high-dose and low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic renal cancer.

PURPOSE: This three-arm randomized study compares response rates and overall survival of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) receiving high-dose or one of two low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic RCC and a good performance status were randomized to receive either 720,000 U/kg (high-dose [HD]) or 72,000 U/kg (low-dose [LD]), both given by intravenous (IV) bolus every 8 hours. After randomly assigning 117 patients, a third arm of low-dose daily subcutaneous IL-2 was added, and an additional 283 patients were randomly assigned. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were randomly assigned to HD IV IL-2, and 150 patients to LD IV IL-2. Toxicities were less frequent with LD IV IL-2 (especially hypotension), but there were no IL-2-related deaths in any arm. There was a higher response proportion with HD IV IL-2 (21%) versus LD IV IL-2 (13%; P =.048) but no overall survival difference. The response rate of subcutaneous IL-2 (10%, partial response and complete response) was similar to that of LD IV IL-2, differing from HD IV (P =.033). Response durability and survival in completely responding patients was superior with HD IV compared with LD IV therapy (P =.04). CONCLUSION: Major tumor regressions, as well as complete responses, were seen with all regimens tested. IL-2 was more clinically active at maximal doses, although this did not produce an overall survival benefit. The immunological factors which constrain the curative potential of IL-2 to only a small percentage of patients need to be further elucidated.     

Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma with interleukin-2]

Between April 1988 and December 1990, 37 patients with progressive histologically proven metastatic melanoma were treated with interleukin-2 according to three multicentric successive protocols. Eighteen males and 19 females entered the trial. Mean age was 44 years (range 20-66); none of the patients had severe visceral disease or brain metastasis. Superficial and visceral metastatic sites were equally distributed. Interleukin-2 was administered as a 3 to 5 day continuous intravenous infusion, at a dose varying from 16 to 24 million international units/m2/day, as previously described by West. The second course was given after a 9 to 16 day free interval and one to seven courses were administered (mean three courses). A total of 132 courses has been given to the 37 patients. All are evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. Toxicity was tolerable and not different from that presented in recent reports. Only four patients had to definitively stop therapy for toxicity, one of them for cardiotoxicity; a dose modification or a transient suspension of therapy occurred in 18% of treatment cycles. One hypothyroidism with anti-thyroglobulin and anti-microsome antibodies was observed. We observed eight major responses (21.6%), usually of short duration (2-6 months). Most responses occurred in superficial lesions. One patient remains in complete remission, as therapy is stopped for 40 months. Immunological parameters, although demonstrating induced immunostimulation, did not correlate with clinical outcome. With an overall response rate of 21.6%, we confirm the activity of interleukin-2 in melanoma, as previously reported by others.     

Interleukin-2 and high-dose cisplatin in patients with metastatic melanoma: a pilot study.

In this pilot study of metastatic melanoma, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy were combined using an alternating schedule designed to explore potential synergism between these modalities. Bolus IL-2 was given at a dose of 600,000 IU/kg intravenously (IV) every 8 hours, days 1 to 5 and 15 to 19, followed by high-dose CDDP administered by two different regimens: (A) 135 to 150 mg/m2 IV bolus over 30 minutes with the chemoprotectant WR-2721 910 mg/m2 or (B) 50 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours every day for 3 days. The trial design allowed an assessment of response to each phase of therapy. Among 27 assessable patients, there were 10 (37%) overall responses, including three (11%) complete responses (CRs) with durations of 9, 16, and 30+ months. Tumor regression was noted in seven patients (partial response [PR], four; minor response [MR], three; response rate [RR], four of 27 [15%]) after IL-2 administration and in 14 patients (PR, 12; MR, two; RR, 12 of 27 [44%]) after CDDP treatment, demonstrating noncrossresistance between the components of the regimen. Major PRs (greater than 90% reduction of tumor burden) or CRs were only seen in patients responding to IL-2. Toxicity during IL-2 therapy was typical for high-dose IL-2 protocols and was reversible. Among the first 20 patients treated with CDDP regimen A, there were eight episodes of grade IV nephrotoxicity (creatinine level greater than 5.0 mg/dL), including three of six patients treated with an initial CDDP dose of 135 mg/m2. This side effect was more frequent among patients with liver metastasis (P less than .05, Fisher's exact test). No significant nephrotoxicity was noted in seven patients treated on regimen B. Although ototoxicity was frequent, minimal bone marrow and neurologic toxicity was noted. There were no treatment-related deaths. This combination showed at least additive activity against melanoma, and the more protracted CDDP schedule was well tolerated. This regimen may serve as a model for future combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy trials in metastatic melanoma.     

The application of high-dose interleukin-2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) evokes an immune response, which has occasionally resulted in spontaneous and dramatic remissions [1–3]. In an attempt to reproduce or accentuate this response, various immunotherapeutic strategies have been studied. The most consistent anti-tumor activity has been reported with interferon alfa (IFN-α) and interleukin 2 (IL-2). In recent years, randomized trials have suggested that high-dose intravenous bolus IL-2 is superior in terms of response rate and possibly response quality to regimens that involve either low-dose IL-2 and IFN-α, intermediate- or low-dose IL-2 alone, or low-dose IFN-α alone. As this list of effective therapies for RCC grows, improvements in patient selection will be necessary to ensure that the only therapy capable of producing durable remissions will remain available to the patients who should receive it [4–7].     

The application of high-dose interleukin-2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) evokes an immune response, which has occasionally resulted in spontaneous and dramatic remissions [1, 2, 3]. In an attempt to reproduce or accentuate this response, various immunotherapeutic strategies have been studied. The most consistent anti-tumor activity has been reported with interferon alfa (IFN-α) and interleukin 2 (IL-2). In recent years, randomized trials have suggested that high-dose intravenous bolus IL-2 is superior in terms of response rate and possibly response quality to regimens that involve either low-dose IL-2 and IFN-α, intermediate- or low-dose IL-2 alone, or low-dose IFN-α alone. As this list of effective therapies for RCC grows, improvements in patient selection will be necessary to ensure that the only therapy capable of producing durable remissions will remain available to the patients who should receive it [4, 5, 6, 7].     

Comparison of two total body irradiation fractionation regimens with respect to acute and late pulmonary toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Total body irradiation (TBI) is commonly used with autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for treatment of hematologic malignancies. Pulmonary complications of TBI can cause long-term morbidity and mortality. The authors have compared the pulmonary toxicity and efficacy of two different TBI fractionation regimens in otherwise identical autologous BMT protocols. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1997 patients younger than 60 years of age with low-grade lymphoma at high risk of treatment failure were enrolled on one of two sequential protocols for autologous BMT differing only in their TBI regimens. The preoperative chemotherapy regimens were identical and consisted of intravenous etoposide (1500 mg/m(2)) for 1 day, intravenous cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) for 2 days, and mesna (10 mg/kg). The TBI used in protocol A consisted of twice-daily fractions of 1.7 grays (Gy) for 3 days to a total of 10.2 Gy through lateral fields, with no lung shielding. In protocol B, the TBI consisted of 3 Gy once daily for 4 days to a total of 12 Gy through anteroposterior fields, with lung shielding (5 half-value layers) during the third dose. Fifty-eight patients were treated on protocol A and 24 on protocol B. The groups were equivalent with regard to age, performance status (PS) and gender. Lung function was assessed objectively by pulmonary function tests (PFTs) before and at intervals after TBI. The pulmonary function parameters assessed included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF(25-75)), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL(CO)), and total lung capacity (TLC). Each patient's post-TBI PFTs were normalized to the corresponding pre-TBI values and analyzed using a random effects model. Clinical pulmonary function status was scored according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria for acute and late lung toxicity. All clinical pulmonary toxicities such as pneumonitis, pneumonia, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, whether specifically related to TBI or not, were scored. Toxicity was classified as either acute (i.e., occurring within 90 days of TBI) or late (i.e., occurring more than 90 days after TBI). The endpoints of analysis were overall survival (OS), freedom from progression, and chronic pulmonary toxicity. Survival, progression, and complication free survival were computed using the method of Kaplan and Meier. RESULTS: Three-year actuarial OS rates were 66% and 67% for protocols A and B, respectively. Patients 50 years of age or older had a hazard ratio of death 3.5 times higher than younger patients. Freedom from progression was significantly different for the 2 TBI regimens (P < 0.001; log-rank test): 31% at 3 years in the protocol A group compared with 82% in protocol B group. Patients on protocol A had a rate of progression 4.7 times higher than patients on protocol B. The TBI protocols did not differ significantly in their effects on FVC, FEV(1), FEF(25-75), DL(CO), and TLC. Patients 45 years of age or older had lower average posttransplant values of FEV(1), FVC, and DL(CO) than younger patients. There was no significant difference in acute or late toxicity rates between patients on the two protocols. Seven of the 57 patients in the twice-daily TBI (protocol A) group had acute pulmonary events (Grade 3 or greater), compared with 6 of the 24 patients in the once-daily (protocol B) group (P = 0.19). The 3-year freedom from late complications rate was 80% in the protocol A group and 70% in the protocol B group (P = 0.45). Patients with a PS of 1 had a hazard ratio of late complications 3.2 times greater than patients with a PS of 0 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to intensify TBI from a total dose of 10.2 Gy delivered in 6 twice-daily fractions to 12 Gy delivered in 4 once-daily fractions without significantly increasing the risk of pulmonary toxicity. The increased dose may contribute to a decrease in the recurrence rate in these patients. (c) 2001 American Cancer Society.     

Phase I trial of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) has activity in metastatic melanoma when given in high doses by the intravenous (IV) route, but its side effects and effectiveness when given in intermediate to high doses by the subcutaneous (SC) route have not been studied adequately. This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IL-2 administered once daily by the SC route. METHODS: Outpatients with progressive metastatic melanoma after chemotherapy were enrolled in a Phase I trial of IL-2 administered SC daily for 5 days per week for 4 consecutive weeks, repeated at 6-week intervals. Patients were instructed to drink at least 2 L of fluid daily. IL-2 pharmacokinetic studies were performed at the two highest dose levels. Toxicity was recorded weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Response was assessed at 6-week intervals. RESULTS: Three patients, 6 patients, 6 patients, and 4 patients received a median of 2 courses of SC IL-2 at dose levels of 6 MIU/m(2), 9 MIU/m(2), 12 MIU/m(2), and 15 MIU/m(2), respectively. Failure to maintain adequate fluid intake was responsible for 2 episodes of syncope at the 9 MIU/m(2) dose level and for 2 incidents of reversible prerenal azotemia at the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level. IL-2 treatment was resumed in these patients without incident. At the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level, 2 patients had severe headaches, depression, and visual hallucinations requiring discontinuation of treatment. Cough and fluid retention at the end of the third and fourth weeks at the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level approximated the symptoms reported by inpatients treated by continuous IV infusion at 9 MIU/m(2) on the same schedule. There was a partial response and a complete response in subcutaneous disease at the 12 MIU/m(2) and 15 MIU/m(2) dose levels, respectively, each lasting < 2 months. Plasma IL-2 levels after SC injection of 1000-5000 pg/mL reached maximum by 3 hours and were detectable for up to 48 hours after administration. The half-lives for SC IL-2 absorbance and clearance were 1.6 hours and 5.2 hours, respectively, and the calculated area under the curve was 30,584 pg/mL x hour. CONCLUSIONS: SC IL-2 was well tolerated and had high sustained bioavailability at the higher doses studied. The MTD for a daily SC regimen was 12 MIU/m(2) and is recommended for future studies.     

Bolus followed by continuous infusion interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and kidney cancer previously treated with interleukin-2

Six patients with either melanoma (3) or kidney cancer (3) who had experienced disease progression on outpatient interleukin-2 regimens were subsequently treated with inpatient bolus Interleukin-2 (IL-2) 36 MIU/m(2) followed by continuous infusion IL-2 18 MIU/m(2)/day for 3 days. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks up to four times, then every 3-4 weeks if tolerated and in the absence of disease progression. Two patients (one each with kidney cancer and melanoma) have achieved partial responses. One patient with kidney cancer and hepatic metastases has had a minor response. Interleukin-2 given at this dose and schedule shows some evidence of activity in patients who have received prior outpatient IL-2.     

Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The Cytokine Working Group conducted a randomized phase III trial to determine the value of outpatient interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2b (IFN) relative to high-dose (HD) IL-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified for bone and liver metastases, primary tumor in place, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and then randomly assigned to receive either IL-2 (5 MIU/m(2) subcutaneously every 8 hours for three doses on day 1, then daily 5 days/wk for 4 weeks) and IFN (5 MIU/m(2) subcutaneously three times per week for 4 weeks) every 6 weeks or HD IL-2 (600,000 U/kg/dose intravenously every 8 hours on days 1 through 5 and 15 to 19 [maximum 28 doses]) every 12 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled between April 1997 and July 2000. Toxicities were as anticipated for these regimens. The response rate was 23.2% (22 of 95 patients) for HD IL-2 versus 9.9% (nine of 91 patients) for IL-2/IFN (P = .018). Ten patients receiving HD IL-2 were progression-free at 3 years versus three patients receiving IL-2 and IFN (P = .082). The median response durations were 24 and 15 [corrected] months (P = .18) [corrected] and median survivals were 17.5 and 13 months (P = .24). For patients with bone or liver metastases (P = .001) or a primary tumor in place (P = .040), survival was superior with HD IL-2. CONCLUSION: This randomized phase III trial provides additional evidence that HD IL-2 should remain the preferred therapy for selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.     

High-dose tamoxifen added to concurrent biochemotherapy with decrescendo interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: In vitro cell culture data and preclinical models suggest that tamoxifen modulates tumor cell sensitivity to a wide range of therapeutic agents. In the current study, the authors examined whether high-dose tamoxifen (HDT) improved the overall and complete response in patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated with concurrent biochemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were treated with a biochemotherapy regimen of dacarbazine, vinblastine, cisplatin, decrescendo interleukin-2, interferon-alpha-2b, and tamoxifen. The study had a 2-step design, beginning with a tamoxifen dose escalation from 40 mg to 320 mg (17 subjects) to evaluate safety and tolerability, followed by Phase II accrual of 32 patients to HDT (320 mg) to assess clinical efficacy. Efficacy was compared with a similar modified biochemotherapy regimen with low-dose tamoxifen (LDT). Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to determine in vivo tamoxifen levels. RESULTS: Tamoxifen dose escalation was completed without any reported dose-limiting toxicity. The overall response rate in the HDT group was 50% (95% confidence interval, 33.2%-66.8%), with a complete response rate of 6% and a median survival of 9.5 months. The overall response rate was not improved and the complete response and survival appeared inferior compared with that of patients recently treated with concurrent biochemotherapy and LDT. Serum tamoxifen levels were found to correlate with the dose administered, with a mean of 0.9 microM at the 40-mg dose to 4.6 microM at the 320-mg dose. Ultrafiltered protein-free sera demonstrated low (< 0.01 microM) concentrations of tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of HDT to a regimen of concurrent biochemotherapy did not appear to improve response rates or overall survival, despite reaching the targeted plasma concentration. Unknown drug interactions or high protein binding of tamoxifen may account for the lack of clinical effectiveness.     

Phase I trial of high-dose bolus interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic malignancy.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical evidence that the antitumor effects of the combination of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa (IFN alpha) are greater than those of either cytokine alone, we have performed a phase I trial of recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) and recombinant human IFN alpha 2a (rHuIFN alpha 2a) in patients with refractory malignancies. This study was an extension of an earlier trial that identified reversible myelosuppression as the dose-limiting toxicity of this combination. The present trial used modified definitions of unacceptable toxicity to allow exploration of higher doses of rIL-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Both rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 intramuscularly (IM) and rIL-2 were administered three times weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. IL-2 was given by intravenous (IV) bolus injection at doses that were escalated in successive cohorts of four to six patients, provided that toxicity at the preceding dose level was acceptable. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as an elevation of the serum creatinine level to greater than 5 mg/dL, an elevation of the serum bilirubin level to greater than 5 mg/dL, dyspnea at rest, hypotension refractory to pressors, altered mental status, or other toxicities of grade 3 to 4, using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria. The doses of rIL-2 administered were 4.0 x 10(6), 6.0 x 10(6), 8.0 x 10(6), 10.0 x 10(6), 12.0 x 10(6), 14.0 x 10(6), 18.0 x 10(6), 22.0 x 10(6), and 26.0 x 10(6) BRMP (Hoffman-LaRoche) U/m2. At a dose of rIL-2 10.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2, patients were also treated with doses of rHuIFN alpha 2a of 1.0 x 10(6) and 0.1 x 10(6) U/m2. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were treated. Intolerable side effects (hypotension, pulmonary, and CNS toxicity) were produced by rIL-2 26.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2 and rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2. Two of 21 patients with renal cell carcinoma showed objective responses, and five of 17 patients with malignant melanoma responded. Two of these responses in melanoma were complete and continue to be longlasting. CONCLUSIONS: When given with rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 as described above, the maximum-tolerated dose of rIL-2 is 22.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2. This dose of rIL-2 is equivalent to 50 to 60 MIU/m2, depending on the conversion factor used. Based on this experience and other trials, we favor phase II trials in renal cell carcinoma using an alternative dose schedule of this cytokine combination, in which rIL-2 is administered by continuous infusion. We suggest that phase II trials of this combination in patients with melanoma use an rIL-2 dose of 8.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2 by IV bolus injection three times weekly in combination with rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 IM three times weekly.     

Interleukin-2 plus chemotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma

We studied the activity of recombinant interleukin-2 (IL2) in combination with multiagent chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive the same dose of lymphokine by constant 24 h intravenous infusion (CI) or by subcutaneous bolus (SB) injection. Twenty-two patients, 18 males and four females with a median age of 44 years (range 32-73 years) were randomized to receive IL2 5 million units/m2 once daily by SB injection or by CI, 5 days/week for 2 weeks. All patients received a chemotherapy regimen consisting of lomustine (CCNU) 75 mg/m2 on day 14, bleomycin 10 units/day by CI for 5 days (days 14-19) and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 19. Patients were retreated after a 3 week interval. There were four complete responses and one partial response in the CI arm and two partial responses in the SB arm. The median duration of response was 38 weeks (range 26-107 weeks). The median duration of survival was 6.7 months in non-responders and 11.1 months in responders. The overall response rate was 32%. Since responses were brief and all the responding patients progressed after a median of 38 weeks, the study was terminated before accrual goals were met.