Is follow up by specialists routinely needed after elective surgery? A controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit of planned specialist follow up appointments after elective inpatient surgery. DESIGN: This was a controlled trial, using repeated alternate allocation of time periods to the two study groups. Group 1: Planned outpatient follow up 6-12 weeks after surgery. Group 2: No planned follow up: additional written information for patients and general practitioners. SETTING: A district general hospital in the north west of England. PARTICIPANTS: 264 patients listed for one of: transurethral resection of the prostate, varicose vein surgery, cholecystectomy (open or laparoscopic), inguinal herniorraphy (open or laparoscopic). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health status, complications, return to normal activity, patient satisfaction, use and costs of primary and secondary care in the 12 weeks after surgery. MAIN RESULTS: Data were available for 212 (80%) of eligible patients. Thirty eight per cent of patients in the "no planned follow up" group were in fact seen in outpatients after their discharge. Intention to treat analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the groups for health status, complications, or time to return to normal activity. Patients in the "no planned follow up" group had significantly fewer hospital visits and costs (mean difference in visits 0.51, 95% confidence intervals 0.39 to 0.69; mean difference in hospital costs 12.75 Pounds, 9.75 Pounds to 15.50 Pounds). There were fewer primary care staff contacts and costs in the "no planned follow up" group, although this difference was not significant (mean difference = 0.61 visits, -0.13 to 1.33 visits; primary care costs difference 8.37 Pounds, -1.31 Pounds to 18.73 Pounds). Patients in the "no planned follow up group" had significantly reduced patient travel costs (mean difference 4.84 Pounds, 3.44 Pounds to 6.22 Pounds). Eighty nine (42%) patients would prefer to be followed up by both their hospital doctor and GP; 53 (25%) patients would prefer to be followed up by the hospital doctor only. There were no significant differences between the two groups in their preferences for follow up. The majority of GPs agreed with the statement that a policy of no follow up at hospital outpatients for each of the six surgical procedures would increase their workload. CONCLUSIONS: Planned outpatient appointments after uncomplicated surgery seem to be neither necessary nor cost effective. A policy of "no planned follow up" results in no increase in primary care costs, and savings in hospital and patient costs. However, many patients expected and wanted to be seen again by their surgeon and GPs were concerned that a "no follow up" policy would result in an increase in workload.     

Point of care testing in the accident and emergency department: a cost analysis and exploration of financial incentives to use the technology within the hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the costs of current arrangements for testing emergency blood samples from patients attending an accident and emergency (A&E) department in a large teaching hospital in England with point of care testing (POCT). METHODS: Estimates were made of the fixed and variable costs of two options: a supplemental option, in which POCT was introduced to A&E only; and a replacement option, in which POCT was introduced to A&E and the intensive therapy unit (ITU), thereby entirely replacing an existing process. RESULTS: For the supplemental option, current arrangements cost 68,466 Pounds in total per year; average costs per test were 5.53 Pounds (venous in the central laboratory) and 3.60 Pounds (arterial on the ITU). Introducing POCT would increase total hospital costs by 35,929 Pounds, and average costs per test would be 5.32 Pounds (venous) and 4.28 Pounds (arterial). For the replacement option, current arrangements cost 132,630 Pounds in total, and average cost per test (for all tests) was 4.06 Pounds. Introducing POCT would make hospital savings ranging from 8332 Pounds to 20,000 Pounds, and average cost per test would be 3.78 Pounds. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing POCT results in lower average costs per test. The supplemental option will result in significantly increased costs to the hospital. The replacement option can lead to significant savings. The internal cross-charging arrangements between departments that exist in this hospital may mean that supplemental implementation of POCT could be potentially 'profitable' for the A&E department, but would result in higher expenditure for the hospital as a whole.     

The costs of alternative types of routine antenatal care for low-risk women: shared care vs care by general practitioners and community midwives

OBJECTIVES: To compare the costs to the health service, women and their families of routine antenatal care provided by either traditional obstetrician-led shared care or general practitioner (GP)/community midwife care. METHOD: A multicentre randomized controlled trial in 51 general practices linked to nine maternity hospitals in Scotland: 1667 low-risk pregnant women provided information on costs to the health service. 704 of these women provided information on non-health service costs. RESULTS: GP/midwife antenatal care was found to cost statistically significantly less than shared care. This was the case for investigations carried out at routine antenatal visits (GP/midwife = 87.25 Pounds, shared care = 91.15 Pounds, P = 0.05), staffing costs at routine antenatal visits (GP/midwife = 127.76 Pounds, shared care = 131.09 Pounds, P = 0.001), and non-health service costs incurred by women and their companions (GP/midwife = 118.53 Pounds, shared care = 133.49 Pounds, P = 0.001). While non-routine care in the GP/midwife arm of the trial costs less than in the shared care arm, the difference was not statistically significant (GP/midwife = 83.74 Pounds, shared care = 94.43 Pounds, P = 0.46). The total societal cost of antenatal care was 417.28 Pounds per women in the GP/midwife arm of the trial and 450.19 Pounds in the shared care arm of the trial. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The application of sensitivity analysis did not change these results. CONCLUSIONS: GP/midwife antenatal care is a satisfactory option for low-risk pregnant women in Scotland provided that clinical outcomes and women's satisfaction are at least the same as those of women with shared care.     

Cost-effectiveness of home-based stroke rehabilitation across Europe: A modelling study

The aim of this study was to explore the cost-effectiveness of home-based versus centre-based rehabilitation in stroke patients across Europe. A state-transition cohort model was developed to simulate the impact of the intervention in 32 European countries. A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a societal perspective including healthcare, social care and informal care costs, and productivity losses. Health outcomes were expressed as QALYs. Sensitivity analyses were conducted concerning model input values and structural assumptions. Data were obtained from a population-based cohort and previously published studies. Across Europe, over 855,000 patients with stroke would be eligible for rehabilitation in 2017. Europe-wide implementation of home-based rehabilitation was estimated to produce 61,888 additional QALYs (95% CI: 3,609 to 118,679) and cost savings of €237 million (95% CI: -237 to 1,764) and of €352 million (95% CI: -340 to 2,237) in health- and social-care and societal costs, respectively. Under base case assumptions, home-based rehabilitation was found highly likely to be cost-effective (>90%), compared to centre-based rehabilitation, in most European countries (29 out of 32). Evidence from this study suggests that a shift from a centre-based to a home-based approach to stroke rehabilitation is likely to be good value for money in most European countries. Further research should be conducted to assess the generalisability of these findings to local settings.     

Implementation of GINA guidelines in Ho Chi Minh City: a model for Viet Nam

Setting:

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines have not been implemented effectively in primary care settings in Viet Nam.

Objectives:

To estimate the proportion of patients with controlled asthma and the direct health care costs of managing asthma according to GINA guidelines at four out-patient clinics in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Viet Nam.

Methods:

One hundred and six patients with asthma were treated and followed up according to GINA guidelines for 12 months. Clinical and pulmonary function responses and direct health care costs were evaluated every 3 months during the study.

Results:

The proportion of patients with controlled asthma rose from 1.0% at the start of the study to 36.8% by the end of the study (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients who had at least one hospitalisation per year decreased significantly, from 32.1% to 5.7% (P < 0.0001). The annual per patient median direct health care cost was US$169. Using asthma controllers continuously gave better asthma control than using them intermittently (OR 12.9, 95%CI 4.7–35.7).

Conclusions:

The implementation of GINA guidelines at out-patient clinics in HCMC, Viet Nam, improved asthma control with modest direct health care costs.     

Resource Utilization and Costs of Stroke Unit Care in Germany

OBJECTIVES: Stroke imposes a considerable economic burden on the individual and society. Recently, the concept of an integrated stroke unit has been established in several countries to improve the outcome of patients. This study evaluates the costs of acute care of the different cerebrovascular insults in a stroke unit. METHODS: The study population included 340 patients who were consecutively admitted to the Department of Neurology, Philipps University Marburg, with the diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) between January 1 and June 30, 2000. Clinical status and course were evaluated by using the Barthel index and the modified Rankin scale. Employing a "bottom-up" approach, we calculated the costs from the perspective of the hospital and the third-party payer using data from provider departments and other published sources. RESULTS: Inpatient costs were 3020 euros (3290 US dollars) for TIA, 3480 euros (3790 US dollars) for ischemic stroke (IS), and 5080 euros (5540 US dollars) for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and differed significantly among these subgroups (P < .05). Patient subgroups ranked in the same order for average length of stay at 9.4 days for TIA, 10.2 days for IS, and 11.9 days for ICH (P > .05). Approximately 30% of the hospital costs are due to physician charges and care. Imaging amounted to 10% and lab investigations to 14% of total costs, independent of the diagnosis. Postacute treatment, including inpatient rehabilitation, cost 9880 euros per patient. Across all diagnostic groups, a mean clinical improvement was observed at time of discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Care of patients with cerebrovascular events in a stroke unit causes a high demand of resources and has a considerable impact on health-care expenditure. Therefore, investigations comparing the stroke unit concept with other strategies in stroke care are necessary to evaluate the stroke unit concept for a rational use of available resources in patients with cerebrovascular events.     

Quality of care for urinary incontinence in a rehabilitation setting for patients with stroke. Simultaneous monitoring of process and outcome.

OBJECTIVE:To study the quality of care provided for patients with urinary incontinence following a stroke, by monitoring both process and outcome elements of care simultaneously. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up of patients (of all ages and of both sexes) with urinary incontinence that appeared following a stroke who were admitted for rehabilitation during a six 6-month period. SETTING: A ward for stroke rehabilitation in The Loewenstein Hospital-Rehabilitation Centre in Raanana, Israel. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with stroke and urinary incontinence (mean age 61 years, 68% men) were included in the study; 84% of the 37 patients were discharged, although only 25% of them were continent. No lasting complications of urinary incontinence developed and there was no interference with rehabilitation activities. There was a correlation between incontinence and low score of Functional Independence Measure (FIM) on admission, being higher on discharge in those who became continent than in those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Ward staff are aware of the potential problem of incontinence in patients with stroke. The problem is identified on admission and accorded adequate attention and care with satisfactory outcomes. The approach of monitoring process and outcome elements of care simultaneously in conditions that, during inpatient rehabilitation of patients with stroke, may endanger life, interfere with rehabilitation and delay functional recovery, could be a useful way to assess and improve the quality of care.     

Quality of stroke guidelines in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

ObjectiveTo identify gaps in national stroke guidelines that could be bridged to enhance the quality of stroke care services in low- and middle-income countries.MethodsWe systematically searched medical databases and websites of medical societies and contacted international organizations. Country-specific guidelines on care and control of stroke in any language published from 2010 to 2020 were eligible for inclusion. We reviewed each included guideline for coverage of four key components of stroke services (surveillance, prevention, acute care and rehabilitation). We also assessed compliance with the eight Institute of Medicine standards for clinical practice guidelines, the ease of implementation of guidelines and plans for dissemination to target audiences.FindingsWe reviewed 108 eligible guidelines from 47 countries, including four low-income, 24 middle-income and 19 high-income countries. Globally, fewer of the guidelines covered primary stroke prevention compared with other components of care, with none recommending surveillance. Guidelines on stroke in low- and middle-income countries fell short of the required standards for guideline development; breadth of target audience; coverage of the four components of stroke services; and adaptation to socioeconomic context. Fewer low- and middle-income country guidelines demonstrated transparency than those from high-income countries. Less than a quarter of guidelines encompassed detailed implementation plans and socioeconomic considerations.ConclusionGuidelines on stroke in low- and middle-income countries need to be developed in conjunction with a wider category of health-care providers and stakeholders, with a full spectrum of translatable, context-appropriate interventions.     

Thrombolysis and its implications in the management of stroke in the accident and emergency department

OBJECTIVES: Examination of initial management of stroke patients in the emergency setting to assess feasibility of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with a clinical diagnosis of stroke over a two month period. Exclusion criteria for thrombolysis were applied to assess the number of patients that would potentially have been eligible for thrombolysis. RESULTS: Of 94 patients identified with clinical stroke, only 57 (60.6%) had a CT scan; 23 (24.4%) were confirmed as having had an acute ischaemic stroke. Mean delay in scanning was 2.2 days (range 0-15 days). Even if all patients had presented and been scanned within three hours (as required for thrombolysis), only six (6.4%) patients would have been eligible for thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The great majority of patients presenting with clinical stroke do not fulfill the criteria for thrombolysis. Current practice involves significant delays in CT scanning, which has implications for resource structuring should thrombolysis become widely available.     

The optimal outcomes of post-hospital care under medicare

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the differences in functional outcomes attributable to discharge to one of four different venues for post-hospital care for each of five different types of illness associated with post-hospital care: stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hip procedures, and hip fracture, and to estimate the costs and benefits associated with discharge to the type of care that was estimated to produce the greatest improvement. STUDY SETTING/DATA SOURCES: Consecutive patients with any of the target diagnoses were enrolled from 52 hospitals in three cities. Data sources included interviews with patients or their proxies, medical record reviews, and the Medicare Automated Data Retrieval System. ANALYSIS: A two-stage regression model looked first at the factors associated with discharge to each type of post-hospital care and then at the outcomes associated with each location. An instrumental variables technique was used to adjust for selection bias. A predictive model was created for each patient to estimate how that person would have fared had she or he been discharged to each type of care. The optimal discharge location was determined as that which produced the greatest improvement in function after adjusting for patients' baseline characteristics. The costs of discharge to the optimal type of care was based on the differences in mean costs for each location. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were collected from patients or their proxies at discharge from hospital and at three post-discharge follow-up times: six weeks, six months, and one year. In addition, the medical records for each participant were abstracted by trained abstractors, using a modification of the Medisgroups method, and Medicare data were summarized for the years before and after the hospitalization. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In general, patients discharged to nursing homes fared worst and those sent home with home health care or to rehabilitation did best. Because the cost of rehabilitation is high, greater use of home care could result in improved outcomes at modest or no additional cost. CONCLUSIONS: Better decisions about where to discharge patients could improve the course of many patients. It is possible to save money by making wiser discharge planning decisions. Nursing homes are generally associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs than the other post-hospital care modalities.     

An economic evaluation comparing two schedules of antenatal visits

OBJECTIVES: To conduct an economic evaluation comparing a traditional antenatal visiting schedule (traditional care) with a reduced schedule of visits (new style care) for women at low risk of complications. METHODS: Economic evaluation using the results of a randomised controlled trial, the Antenatal Care Project. This took place between 1993 and 1994 in antenatal clinics in South East London and involved 2794 women at low risk of complications. RESULTS: The estimated baseline costs to the UK National Health Service (NHS) for the traditional schedule were 544 Pounds per woman, of which 251 Pounds occurred antenatally, with a range of 327-1203 Pounds per woman. The estimated baseline costs to the NHS for the reduced visit schedule was 563 Pounds per woman, of which 225 Pounds occurred antenatally, with a range of 274-1741 Pounds per woman. Savings from new style care that arose antenatally were offset by the greater numbers of babies in this group who required special or intensive care. Sensitivity analyses based on possible variations in unit costs and resource use and modelled postnatal stay showed considerable variation and substantial overlap in costs. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of antenatal care involving fewer routine visits for women at low risk of complications are unlikely to result in savings to the Health Service. In addition, women who had the reduced schedule of care reported greater dissatisfaction with their care and poorer psychosocial outcomes which argues against reducing numbers of antenatal visits.     

Guidelines for preoperative assessment: impact on clinical practice and costs.

OBJECTIVE: To describe preoperative evaluation in the San Giovanni Battista Hospital in Turin and to forecast the economic impact when preoperative assessment guidelines are implemented. DESIGN: We enrolled, in a month, 702 consecutive patients, excluding cardiac, thoracic, neuro- and vascular surgery, as well as emergency operations. Preoperative assessment data were collected individually, followed by simulating various applications of guidelines based on: (i) preoperative tests relying on full medical history and physical examination to discriminate preoperative risk patients; (ii) organization of a preoperative evaluation unit and tests before patient hospitalization. MAIN MEASURES: Mean number of tests prescribed, preoperative assessment cost per patient. RESULTS: The application of preoperative guidelines would decrease the mean number of tests prescribed from 20 laboratory and 1.9 instrumental to, respectively, 3 and 1.4 per patient. Tests deemed inappropriate by guidelines did not add any relevant clinical information to our study. Economic analysis estimates a reduction of 63% in cost per patient for preoperative tests by introducing guideline criteria (from 69 euros to 26 euros). As regards the cost per patient for preoperative evaluation and hospital stay (115 euros considering only variable costs, 580 euros including all costs), the application of the guidelines would reduce costs by 41-52% according to different cost evaluation approaches for hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Preoperative guidelines fully introduced in practice could notably increase efficiency without affecting the quality of care.     

Future costs of stroke in the Netherlands: the impact of stroke services

OBJECTIVES: In the next decades, the number of stroke patients is expected to increase. Furthermore, organizational changes, such as stroke services, are expected to be implemented on a large scale. The purpose of this study is to estimate the future healthcare costs by taking into account the expected increase of stroke patients and a nationwide implementation of stroke services. METHODS: By means of a dynamic multistate life table, the total number of stroke patients can be projected. The model calculates the annual number of patients by age and gender. The total healthcare costs are calculated by multiplying the average healthcare costs specified by age, gender, and healthcare sector with the total number of stroke patients specified by age and gender. RESULTS: In the year 2000, the healthcare costs for stroke amounted to euro 1.62 billion. This amount is approximately 4.4 percent of the total national healthcare budget. Projections of the total costs of stroke based on current practice result in an increase of 28 percent (euro 2.08 billion) in the year 2020. A nationwide implementation of stroke services in 2020 would result in a substantial reduction of the costs of stroke (euro 1.81 billion: 13 percent cost reduction) compared with the regular care scenario. CONCLUSIONS: A nationwide implementation of stroke services is a strong policy tool for cost containment of health care in an aging population like that in the Netherlands. Policy makers should optimize the organization of stroke care.     

A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective

A randomized controlled trial was carried out to measure the cost-effectiveness of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional outpatient dermatology care for patients from urban and rural areas. One urban and one rural health centre were linked to a regional hospital in Northern Ireland by ISDN at 128 kbit/s. Over two years, 274 patients required a hospital outpatient dermatology referral--126 patients (46%) were randomized to a telemedicine consultation and 148 (54%) to a conventional hospital outpatient consultation. Of those seen by telemedicine, 61% were registered with an urban practice, compared with 71% of those seen conventionally. The clinical outcomes of the two types of consultation were similar--almost half the patients were managed after a single consultation with the dermatologist. The observed marginal cost per patient of the initial realtime teledermatology consultation was 52.85 Pounds for those in urban areas and 59.93 Pounds per patient for those from rural areas. The observed marginal cost of the initial conventional consultation was 47.13 Pounds for urban patients and 48.77 Pounds for rural patients. The total observed costs of teledermatology were higher than the costs of conventional care in both urban and rural areas, mainly because of the fixed equipment costs. Sensitivity analysis using a real-world scenario showed that in urban areas the average costs of the telemedicine and conventional consultations were about equal, while in rural areas the average cost of the telemedicine consultation was less than that of the conventional consultation.     

Systematic review of economic evidence on stroke rehabilitation services

OBJECTIVES: Given the resource-intensive nature of stroke rehabilitation, it is important that services be delivered in an evidence-based and cost-efficient manner. The objective of this review was to assess the evidence on the relative cost or cost-effectiveness of three rehabilitation services after stroke: stroke unit care versus care on another hospital ward, early supported discharge (ESD) services versus "usual care," and community or home-based rehabilitation versus "usual care." METHODS: A systematic literature review of cost analyses or economic evaluations was performed. Study characteristics and results (including mean total cost per patient) were summarized. The level of evidence concerning relative cost or cost-effectiveness for each service type was determined qualitatively. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria: three on stroke unit care, eight on ESD services, and four on community-based rehabilitation. All were classified as cost-consequences analysis or cost analysis. The time horizon was generally short (1 year or less). The comparators and the scope of costs varied between studies. CONCLUSIONS: There was "some" evidence that the mean total cost per patient of rehabilitation in a stroke unit is comparable to care provided in another hospital ward. There is "moderate" evidence that ESD services provide care at modestly lower total costs than usual care for stroke patients with mild or moderate disability. There was "insufficient" evidence concerning the cost of community-based rehabilitation compared with usual care. Several methodological problems were encountered when analyzing the economic evidence.     

Health professionals’ adherence to stroke clinical guidelines: A review of the literature

Background

The process of implementation of clinical guidelines i.e. getting guidelines into practice has been extensively reviewed and meta-reviewed from a generic perspective. However, in relation to stroke care, there has been no review of these studies to date, although implementing stroke clinical guidelines is a topic of great interest within the stroke literature. This review aims to identify stroke studies that have addressed adherence to generic and specific stroke care clinical guidelines.

Method

A computer search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Systematic Reviews databases. Search terms included those relevant to the implementation of stroke clinical guidelines. We assessed all studies retrieved against specific inclusion criteria and collated only those studies that emphasized adherence to stroke clinical guidelines.

Results

Eighty-eight articles were selected for further review from 153 articles retrieved. Of those, 27 were studies on adherence to stroke clinical guidelines and were included in this review – 16 were categorized as generic stroke guidelines and 11 were on specific aspects of stroke care. Each category was further divided into studies that assessed adherence to stroke guidelines only and those that intervened to improve adherence. Adherence was generally greater for studies that included an intervention. Specific stroke care guidelines were poorly adhered to compared to generic stroke guidelines but these studies were better at identifying organizational and team barriers to implementation. Most studies conducted audits of patient medical records and a limited number assessed health professionals’ views or used a behavioural framework to assess adherence.

Discussion

Adherence to stroke guidelines varied in the studies reviewed. Given the evidence that implementation of clinical guidelines in stroke care leads to better quality of care and improved health outcomes for patients, there is a need to increase adherence behaviours of health professionals towards recommended guidelines, in particular for long term stroke care.     

神经内科护理人员对脑卒中康复知识知晓率调查

摘要:目的　通过对神经内科康复护理人员对脑卒中康复知识知晓率进行调查,对问题进行分析及研究,从而采取相应的措施改进,为今后不断提高护理人员康复护理水平奠定基础。方法　选取某院神经内科护理人员44名作为调查对象,采用自行制定的 “神经内科护理人员脑卒中康复护理认知情况调查表”,对调查对象进行不记名自填式问卷调查,调查对象进行集中填写、统一回收。评价调查表得分情况及总分得分情况,并分析护理知识部分各题的知晓率。结果　52.27%的调查对象知识部分得分为40～49分,56.82%的调查对象康复护理态度＜20分。根据总分（100分）来看,调查对象平均得分为（68.9±8.4）分,调查对象中,＜60分者占20.45%,60～79分者占43.18%,80～89分者占27.27%,90分及以上者占9.09%,多数调查对象得分集中于60～89分之间。调查对象对“康复护理与一般护理的区别及联系”知晓率较高,达77.27%,其次为“自我护理理论”,知晓率70.45%,对“康复护理的环境要求”、“肩关节保护法”的知晓率较低,分别为36.36%、40.91%,对“脑卒中康复护理的基本内容”、“脑卒中康复护理的介入时间”、“头部保护体位”的知晓率也较低,知晓率均为43.18%,不足50%。结论　该院神经内科护理人员对脑卒中康复护理知识掌握仍有欠缺,应针对性的开展培训及健康教育,强化护理技能,提高护理人员康复护理水平。     

Home rehabilitation after stroke. Reviewing the scientific evidence on effects and costs

OBJECTIVES: The question addressed here is whether home rehabilitation after stroke is better and/or less expensive than the more conventional alternatives, i.e., rehabilitation during inpatient care, day care, and outpatient visits--alone or in combinations appropriate to disease stage and patient needs. Home rehabilitation is managed by teams of professionals who train patients at home. METHODS: The scientific literature was systematically searched for controlled studies comparing outcomes and costs of home rehabilitation with the more conventional strategies. RESULTS: The abstracts of 204 papers were evaluated, from which 89 were selected for greater scrutiny. From the 89 studies, we found 7 controlled studies involving 1,487 patients (6 of the 7 were randomized, 4 of the 6 assessed costs). No statistically significant differences, or tendencies toward differences, were revealed as regards the outcome of home rehabilitation versus hospital-based alternatives. Thus, home rehabilitation was neither better nor worse at improving patients' ability to manage on their own or resume social activities. Depression and reduced quality of life were common in all groups of patients and caregivers, irrespective of the rehabilitation strategy. In the four randomized studies that reported on costs, home rehabilitation was found to be less expensive than regular day care, but not less expensive than conventional strategies even though hospital stay was reduced. CONCLUSION: The outcomes and costs of home rehabilitation after stroke seem to be comparable to alternative treatment strategies.     

Costs of home care for advanced breast and cervical cancer in relation to cost-effectiveness of screening.

The costs of home care in the Netherlands are estimated for women with advanced breast and cervical cancer. We observe a growing role of intensive home care for the terminally ill patients. The average costs of home care are dfl 8,500 per patient for breast cancer patients and dfl 7,200 for cervical cancer patients. More than half of these costs are incurred in the last month before death. The level of home care in the preceding months is quite modest (dfl 120 per month for both diseases), not taking into account informal care. The costs of home care for patients with advanced cancer are only slightly related to the site of the primary tumor from which the metastases originate. Total average costs per patient during advanced disease, including hospital and nursing home care, amount to dfl 42,700 for breast cancer and dfl 29,000 for cervical cancer. This difference in costs is largely attributable to the longer duration of advanced disease for breast cancer, which substantially affects hospital costs. The high costs of care to patients with advanced cancer contribute to a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio of those screening programmes which reduce mortality and consequently the costs of care to advanced cancer patients.